DOCSLIB.ORG

Evidence for Evolution 15 21 SHU 31905 Ch15 346 367.Indd 346 21 SHU 31905 Ch15 346 367.Indd 347

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evidence for Evolution 15 21 SHU 31905 Ch15 346 367.Indd 346 21 SHU 31905 Ch15 346 367.Indd 347 15 Evidence for Evolution DRIVING QUESTIONS 1. How does the fossil record reveal information about evolutionary changes? 2. What features make Tiktaalik a transitional fossil, and what role do these types of fossil play in the fossil record? 3. What can anatomy and DNA reveal about evolution? Copyright ©2018 W.H. Freeman Publishers. Distributed by W.H. Freeman Publishers. Not for redistribution. 21_SHU_31905_ch15_346_367.indd 346 13/07/17 11:28 AM A Fish with Fingers? A transitional fossil fills a gap in our knowledge of evolution OR 5 YEARS, BIOLOGISTS NEIL SHUBIN AND TED DAESCHLER spent their summers trekking through one of the most desolate regions on Earth. FThey were fossil hunting on remote Ellesmere Island, in the Canadian Arctic, about 600 miles from the north pole. Even in summer, Ellesmere is a forbidding place: a windswept, frozen desert where sparse vegetation grows no more than a few inches tall, where sleet and snow fall in the middle of July, and where the sun never sets. Only a handful of wild animals survive here, but those that do make for dangerous working conditions: hungry polar bears and charging herds of muskoxen are known hazards of working in the Arctic, says Daeschler, who carried a shotgun for protection. Photo used with permission from Tangled Bank Studios, LLC. Copyright 2014. All rights reserved. Tangled Photo used with permission from 347 Copyright ©2018 W.H. Freeman Publishers. Distributed by W.H. Freeman Publishers. Not for redistribution. 21_SHU_31905_ch15_346_367.indd 347 13/07/17 11:29 AM 348 15 UNIT 3 • HOW DOES LIFE CHANGE OVER TIME? EVOLUTION AND DIVERSITY Ted Daeschler/Academy of Natural Sciences/VIREO Ted Fossil hunting in the vast wilderness of Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic. When not looking over their shoulders, of four-legged, land-dwelling vertebrates— the researchers drilled, chiseled, and ham- including humans. mered their way through rocks looking for Tiktaalik “splits the difference between fossils. Not just any rocks and fossils, but ones something we think of as a fish and something dating from 375 million years ago, when ani- we think of as a limbed animal,” says Daeschler, mals were taking their first tentative steps on a curator of vertebrate zoology at the Acad- land. For three summers, they scoured the emy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia. “In site of what was once an active streambed that sense, it is a wonderful transitional fossil but found little of interest. Then, in 2004, between two major groups of vertebrates.” the team made a tantalizing discovery: the Today, of course, four-legged animals snout of a curious-looking creature protrud- roam far and wide over land. But 400 mil- ing from a slab of pink rock. Further excava- lion years ago it was a different story. Life was tion revealed the well-preserved remains of mostly aquatic then, restricted to oceans and several flat-headed animals between 4 and 9 fresh water streams. How life made the jump feet long. In some ways, the animals resem- from water to land is a question that has long bled giant fish—they had fins and scales. But intrigued evolutionary biologists. In fact, sci- they also had traits that resembled those of entists have been searching for evidence of land-dwelling amphibians—notably, a neck, this milestone ever since Charles Darwin first wrists, and fingerlike bones. The research- proposed that all life on the planet is related ers named the new species Tiktaalik roseae; by a tree of common descent. According to tiktaalik (pronounced tic-TAH-lick) is a native Shubin, a professor of biology at the Univer- VERTEBRATE word meaning “large freshwater fish.” This sity of Chicago and the Field Museum of Nat- An animal with a bony or ancient hybrid animal no longer exists, but ural History, Tiktaalik is the most compelling cartilaginous backbone. it represents a critical phase in the evolution example yet of an animal that lived at the cusp Copyright ©2018 W.H. Freeman Publishers. Distributed by W.H. Freeman Publishers. Not for redistribution. 21_SHU_31905_ch15_346_367.indd 348 13/07/17 11:29 AM 349 of this important transition. Not only does it Because not all organisms are preserved, DESCENT WITH 15 fill a gap in our knowledge, the discovery also the fossil record is not a complete record MODIFICATION EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION provides persuasive evidence in support of of past life. Nevertheless, the existing fossil Darwin’s term for evolution, Darwin’s theory. record is remarkably rich and offers a revealing combining the ideas that all living things are related and window into the past. Paleontologists, scien- that organisms have changed tists who study ancient life, have uncovered over time. Reading the Fossil hundreds of thousands of fossils throughout FOSSILS Record the world, from many evolutionary time peri- The preserved remains or ods. When fossils are arranged in order of impressions of once-living The theory of evolution—what Darwin called age, they provide a tangible history of life on organisms. descent with modification—draws two Earth. The fossil record also allows biologists FOSSIL RECORD main conclusions about life on Earth: that all to test certain tenets of Darwin’s theory. An assemblage of fossils living things are related, and that the differ- arranged in order of age, For example, if all organisms have de- ent species we see today have emerged over providing evidence of scended from a single common ancestor that time as a result of natural selection operat- changes in species over time. lived billions of years ago, as the theory of ing over millions of years. Many lines of evi- PALEONTOLOGIST evolution concludes they did, then we would A scientist who studies dence support this theory (remember that in expect the fossil record to show an ordered ancient life by examining the science a “theory” is an idea supported by a fossil record. succession of evolutionary stages as organisms tremendous amount of evidence and which evolved and diversified. And, indeed, that is has never been disproved; see Chapter 1). exactly what we see: prokaryotes appear be- One of the most compelling lines of evidence fore eukaryotes, for evolution comes from fossils, the pre- single-celled organisms before served remains or impressions of once-living multicellular ones, water-dwelling organisms organisms. Fossils are like snapshots of past before land- dwelling ones, fish before amphibi- life, capturing what life was like at particular ans, reptiles before birds, and so on. moments in time. Moreover, we would expect to see changes Fossils are formed in a number of ways: over time within a family of organisms, and an animal or plant may be frozen in ice, we do. One exceptionally well studied exam- trapped in amber (hardened tree sap), or ple is horses. Comparisons of modern-day buried in a thick layer of mud. The entombed horse bones with fossils of horse ancestors organism is thereby protected from being eaten by scavengers or rapidly decomposed Ted Daeschler/Academy of Natural Sciences/VIREO by bacteria. Over time, if conditions are right— for example, if the mud encasing the speci- men remains undisturbed long enough for hardening to occur—the organism’s shape is preserved. Not all organisms are equally likely to form fossils, however: animals with bones or shells are more likely to be preserved than animals without such hard parts (think earthworms or jel- lyfish) that decay quickly. And conditions per- mitting fossilization are rare: the organ- ism has to be in just the right place at just the right time A Tiktaalik roseae fossil. (INFOGRAPHIC 15.1). Copyright ©2018 W.H. Freeman Publishers. Distributed by W.H. Freeman Publishers. Not for redistribution. 21_SHU_31905_ch15_346_367.indd 349 13/07/17 11:29 AM 350 15 INFOGRAPHIC 15.1 Fossils Form Only in Certain Circumstances UNIT 3 • Not every organism that dies forms a fossil. Organisms are more likely to fossilize if they have bony skeletons or hard shells. In addition, the organism must be preserved quickly and kept undisturbed while mineralization or mud hardening occurs. Therefore, the fossil record is not a complete record of past life, but it has supplied an impressive body of evidence for evolution. HOW DOES LIFE CHANGE OVER TIME? EVOLUTION AND DIVERSITY Organism dies. choicegraphx/iStockphoto Is the dead organism No Fossil Forms No Organism is eaten preserved quickly? or broken down by aerobic microbes. Yes Organism is preserved by rapid Organism is preserved by rapid burial freezing, desiccation, or burial in in sediment layers. amber (hardened tree sap). In these cases, Quick burial in sediment organisms are (for example, by a preserved largely mudslide or volcanic in their original eruption) protects the state. body from rapid decay. Colin Keates/Getty Images Spider in amber Are the conditions right for fossilization of this No Fossil Forms buried organism? No Organism is slowly broken down by Yes bacteria, and water contributes to erosion. Organism is fossilized by mineralization. Organism is fossilized by imprint or mold. Hard parts of the body The soft mud in which a such as teeth and bones dead organism is buried do not decay rapidly. hardens into rock around Over time minerals in the organism. Over time the water are deposited in the organism decays, leaving a spaces within bones or space in the surrounding Arpad Benedek/Getty Images replace the bone as it rock. The space has the breaks down. The result Ralf Hettler/iStockphoto same shape as the exterior is a mineralized fossil. of the organism. ? Why are flies in amber more common than fossilized flies? reveal how, in the course of evolution, horses There are several branches and lineages of have lost most of their toes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution: Pattern, Pro Cess, and the Evidence
    Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution: Pattern, Pro cess, and the Evidence Jonathan B. Losos Evolutionary biology is unusual: unlike any other science, evolution- ary biologists study a phenomenon that some people do not think exists. Consider chemistry, for example; it is unlikely that anyone does not believe in the existence of chemical reactions. Ditto for the laws of physics. Even within biology, no one believes that cells do not exist nor that DNA is a fraud. But public opinion polls consistently show that a majority of the American public is either unsure about or does not believe that life has evolved through time. For example, a Gallup poll taken repeatedly over the past twenty years indicates that as much as 40 percent of the population believes that the Bible is liter- ally correct. When I teach evolutionary biology, I focus on the ideas about how evolution works, rather than on the empirical record of how species have changed through time. However, for one lecture period I make an exception, and in some respects I consider this the most important lecture of the semester. Sad as I fi nd it to be, most of my students will not go on to become evolutionary biologists. Rather, they will become leaders in many diverse aspects of society: doctors, lawyers, business- people, clergy, and artists; people to whom others will look for guid- ance on matters of knowledge and science. For this reason, although I devote my course to a detailed understanding of the evolutionary pro cess, I consider it vitally important that my students understand why it is that almost all biologists fi nd the evidence that evolution has occurred— and continues to occur— to be overwhelming.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiktaalik: Reconstructed at Left Tetrapod Testimony
    Fa m i liar Fossils Tiktaalik fossil at right and Fossil site Tiktaalik: reconstructed at left Tetrapod Testimony IMAGINE a creature that looks like a crocodile with a neck but which also has gills like a fish! The stuff of nightmares, did you say? But it is just Tiktaalik roseae – a fish-like fossil that was introduced to the year old rocks. world on April 2006 by a team of researchers led by Neil They had a pretty Shubin, Edward Daeschler and Farish Jenkins, who clear idea about uncovered this bizarre specimen. It has been hailed as what sort of being the species that blurs the boundary between fish animal they were and the four-legged tetrapods. looking for. Tiktaalik was found on Ellesmere Island, Canada, However, success not too far from the North Pole in the Arctic Circle. It has was not been described as, “a cross between a fish and a crocodile.” immediate. It took It lived in the Devonian era lasting from 417m to 354m them five separate years ago. The name Tiktaalik is the Inuktitut word for expeditions to the freshwater fish burbot (Lota lota). The name was Canada before they suggested by Inuit elders of the area where the fossil was raised the discovered. The specific name roseae holds the clue to Tiktaalik. the name of an anonymous donor and is a tribute to the Tiktaalik was dubbed a “fishapod” by Daeschler. The person. media called it a “missing link” between fish and the Tiktaalik was a fish no doubt but a special one. Its four-legged tetrapods.
    [Show full text]
  • AMS112 1978-1979 Lowres Web
    --~--------~--------------------------------------------~~~~----------~-------------- - ~------------------------------ COVER: Paul Webber, technical officer in the Herpetology department searchers for reptiles and amphibians on a field trip for the Colo River Survey. Photo: John Fields!The Australian Museum. REPORT of THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM TRUST for the YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE , 1979 ST GOVERNMENT PRINTER, NEW SOUTH WALES-1980 D. WE ' G 70708K-1 CONTENTS Page Page Acknowledgements 4 Department of Palaeontology 36 The Australian Museum Trust 5 Department of Terrestrial Invertebrate Ecology 38 Lizard Island Research Station 5 Department of Vertebrate Ecology 38 Research Associates 6 Camden Haven Wildlife Refuge Study 39 Associates 6 Functional Anatomy Unit.. 40 National Photographic Index of Australian Director's Research Laboratory 40 Wildlife . 7 Materials Conservation Section 41 The Australian Museum Society 7 Education Section .. 47 Letter to the Premier 9 Exhibitions Department 52 Library 54 SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENTS Photographic and Visual Aid Section 54 Department of Anthropology 13 PublicityJ Pu bl ications 55 Department of Arachnology 18 National Photographic Index of Australian Colo River Survey .. 19 Wildlife . 57 Lizard Island Research Station 59 Department of Entomology 20 The Australian Museum Society 61 Department of Herpetology 23 Appendix 1- Staff .. 62 Department of Ichthyology 24 Appendix 2-Donations 65 Department of Malacology 25 Appendix 3-Acknowledgements of Co- Department of Mammalogy 27 operation. 67 Department of Marine
    [Show full text]
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish That Crawled out of the Water
    Published online 5 April 2006 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news060403-7 News The fish that crawled out of the water A newly found fossil links fish to land-lubbers. Rex Dalton A crucial fossil that shows how animals crawled out from the water, evolving from fish into land-loving animals, has been found in Canada. The creature, described today in Nature1,2, lived some 375 million years ago. Palaeontologists are calling the specimen from the Devonian a true 'missing link', as it helps to fill in a gap in our understanding of how fish developed legs for land mobility, before eventually evolving into modern animals including mankind. Several samples of the fish-like tetrapod, named Tiktaalik roseae, were “Tetrapods did not so much discovered by Edward Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Neil Shubin of the University of Chicago in conquer the land, The fossilized remains of as escape from the Illinois, Farish Jenkins of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts Tiktaalik show a crocodile-like water.” and colleagues. creature with joints in its front arms. The crew found the samples in a river delta on Ellesmere Island in Arctic credit Ted Daeschler Canada; these included a near-complete front half of a fossilized skeleton of a crocodile-like creature, whose skull is some 20 centimetres long. The beast has bony scales and fins, but the front fins are on their way to becoming limbs; they have the internal skeletal structure of an arm, including elbows and wrists, but with fins instead of clear fingers. The team is still looking for more complete specimens to get a better picture of hind part of the animal.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Living Earth Evidence for Evolution Lessons Name: School: Teacher
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=CA-B High School Living Earth Evidence for Evolution Lessons Name: School: Teacher: The Unit should take approximately 4 days complete. Read each section and complete the tasks. DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=CA-B FIGURE 1: This creosote ring in the Mojave Desert is estimated to be 11 700 years old . This makes it one of the oldest living organisms on Earth . The creosote bush is thought to be the most drought-tolerant plant in North America. It has a variety of adaptations to its desert environment, including its reproductive tendency to clone outward in rings rather than rely solely on seed production. The plant’s leaves are coated in a foul-tasting resin that protects it from water loss through evaporation and from grazing. It only opens its stomata in the morning to pull in carbon dioxide for photosynthesis from the more humid air and closes them as the day’s temperature increases. It also has a root system that consists of both an exceptionally long tap root and a vast network of shallow feeder roots. Creosote bushes exhibit two different shapes to fit different microclimates. In drier areas, the plant has a cone shape in which stems funnel rainwater into the taproot. In wetter areas, the bush has a more rounded shape that provides shade to its shallow feeder roots. PREDICT How do species change over time to adjust to varying conditions? DRIVING QUESTIONS As you move through the unit, gather evidence to help you answer the following questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Range National Park
    Cape Range National Park Management Plan No 65 2010 R N V E M E O N G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T CAPE RANGE NATIONAL PARK Management Plan 2010 Department of Environment and Conservation Conservation Commission of Western Australia VISION By 2020, the park and the Ningaloo Marine Park will be formally recognised amongst the world’s most valuable conservation and nature based tourism icons. The conservation values of the park will be in better condition than at present. This will have been achieved by reducing stress on ecosystems to promote their natural resilience, and facilitating sustainable visitor use. In particular, those values that are not found or are uncommon elsewhere will have been conserved, and their special conservation significance will be recognised by the local community and visitors. The park will continue to support a wide range of nature-based recreational activities with a focus on preserving the remote and natural character of the region. Visitors will continue to enjoy the park, either as day visitors from Exmouth or by camping in the park itself at one of the high quality camping areas. The local community will identify with the park and the adjacent Ningaloo Marine Park, and recognise that its values are of international significance. An increasing number of community members will support and want to be involved in its ongoing management. The Indigenous heritage of the park will be preserved by the ongoing involvement of the traditional custodians, who will have a critical and active role in jointly managing the cultural and conservation values of the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • <Article-Title>Your Inner Fish
    ELIZABETHCOWLES, DEPARTMENT EDITOR We are happy to welcomeABM new Book ReviewsEditor, ElizabethCowles. ANIMAL EVOLUTION describeshis evolutionfrom "wetbehind the ears"novice to world famous,verte- R brate variousfield YourInner Fish: A Into the 3.5- paleontologist.Noting Journey he shares lessons Billion-Year of the Human experiences, important History Body. he has learned the He details Neil Shubin. 2008. Pantheon Books. along way. By from the to find- 240 Hardcover. everystep, planning trip (ISBN0375424474). pp. fossils to the $24.00. ing requiredpost-expedi- tion lab work. Of course, Shubin'smost In April2006, an above-the-foldstory impressive,logistically difficult expedition B on the front page of TheNew YorkTimes to date involvedfinding, unearthing, and introducedthe world to the fossilTiktaalik. extractingTiktaalik and thatreceives early, Composed of featuresthat are part fish prominenttreatment. Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/70/5/308/54744/30163281.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 and Tiktaalikwas held part amphibian, But the real of this book is as an link"in ter- triumph up important"missing the ease with which Shubin the restrialvertebrate evolution. The fossiland plucks same in different its Dr. Neil were thus string many ways-name- discoverer, Shubin, that whatever thrust into the currentdebate ly, through organ system headlong or scientific lens it is on the of evolutionin the biol- analyzed viewed, teaching clearthat within fish areantecedents to all classroom.Shubin has on ogy capitalized limbed vertebrates.In discrete the fame the of chapters, accompanying discovery the evolution of terres- Tiktaalikto his firstbook YourInner Shubin explores pen trial ears,teeth, limbs, and chemore- Fish: A Journey Into the 3.5-Billion-Year eyes, ceptors from structureswithin fish (and History of the HumanBody.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Systematic Biology & Evolution
    CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY & EVOLUTION 2008 ACTIVITY REPORT BY THE NUMBERS Research Visitors ....................... 253 Student Visitors.......................... 230 Other Visitors.......................... 1,596 TOTAL....................... 2,079 Outgoing Loans.......................... 535 Specimens/Lots Loaned........... 6,851 Information Requests .............. 1,294 FIELD WORK Botany - Uruguay Diatoms – Russia (Commander Islands, Kamchatka, Magdan) Entomology – Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Lesotho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Mongolia, Namibia, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Africa, Tennessee LMSE – Zambia Ornithology – Alaska, England Vertebrate Paleontology – Canada (Nunavut Territory), Pennsylvania PROPOSALS BOTANY . Digitization of Latin American, African and other type specimens of plants at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Global Plants Initiative (GPI), Mellon Foundation Award. DIATOMS . Algal Research and Ecologival Synthesis for the USGS National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program Cooperative Agreement 3. Co-PI with Don Charles (Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Phycology). Collaborative Research on Ecosystem Monitoring in the Russian Northern Far-East, Trust for Mutual Understanding Grant. CSBE Activity Report - 2008 . Diatoms of the Northcentral Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Wild Rescue Conservation Grant. Renovation and Computerization of the Diatom Herbarium at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, National
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Basal Tetrapoda
    Stuart S. Sumida Biology 342 Phylogeny of Basal Tetrapoda The group of bony fishes that gave rise to land-dwelling vertebrates and their descendants (Tetrapoda, or colloquially, “tetrapods”) was the lobe-finned fishes, or Sarcopterygii. Sarcoptrygii includes coelacanths (which retain one living form, Latimeria), lungfish, and crossopterygians. The transition from sarcopterygian fishes to stem tetrapods proceeded through a series of groups – not all of which are included here. There was no sharp and distinct transition, rather it was a continuum from very tetrapod-like fishes to very fish-like tetrapods. SARCOPTERYGII – THE LOBE-FINNED FISHES Includes •Actinista (including Coelacanths) •Dipnoi (lungfishes) •Crossopterygii Crossopterygians include “tetrapods” – 4- legged land-dwelling vertebrates. The Actinista date back to the Devonian. They have very well developed lobed-fins. There remains one livnig representative of the group, the coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. A lungfish The Crossopterygii include numerous representatives, the best known of which include Eusthenopteron (pictured here) and Panderichthyes. Panderichthyids were the most tetrapod-like of the sarcopterygian fishes. Panderichthyes – note the lack of dorsal fine, but retention of tail fin. Coelacanths Lungfish Rhizodontids Eusthenopteron Panderichthyes Tiktaalik Ventastega Acanthostega Ichthyostega Tulerpeton Whatcheeria Pederpes More advanced amphibians Tiktaalik roseae – a lobe-finned fish intermediate between typical sarcopterygians and basal tetrapods. Mid to Late Devonian; 375 million years old. The back end of Tiktaalik’s skull is intermediate between fishes and tetrapods. Tiktaalik is a fish with wrist bones, yet still retaining fin rays. The posture of Tiktaalik’s fin/limb is intermediate between that of fishes an tetrapods. Coelacanths Lungfish Rhizodontids Eusthenopteron Panderichthyes Tiktaalik Ventastega Acanthostega Ichthyostega Tulerpeton Whatcheeria Pederpes More advanced amphibians Reconstructions of the basal tetrapod Ventastega.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide: Tiktaalik: a Fish out of Water
    Teacher’s Guide: Tiktaalik: A Fish Out of Water Recommended Grade Level: 5–8 (also applicable to grades 9–12 for students requiring significant support in learning) Suggested Time: About 50–60 minutes spread over one or more class periods, plus additional time to complete a writing assignment Goals Vocabulary Following are the big ideas that students • fossil should take away after completing this lesson: • characteristic • Transitional fossils help scientists establish • transition how living things are related • tetrapod • Physical features and behaviors may • species change over time to help living things sur- vive where they live • amphibian • evolution Key Literacy Strategies Following are the primary literacy strategies students will use to complete this activity: • Categorizing basic facts and ideas (screen 10) • Making inferences (screens 4 and 7, writing assignment 2) • Identifying and using text features (screens 4, 6, and 9) • Determining important information (screen 7, writing assignment 1) • Sequencing events (screen 9) Note: In addition to using the key literacy strategies listed above, students will use each of the strategies below to complete this lesson: • Monitoring comprehension • Synthesizing • Making predictions • Developing vocabulary • Connecting prior knowledge to new learning • Developing a topic in writing • Identifying and using text features (photographs, captions, diagrams, and/or maps) Overview Tiktaalik: A Fish Out of Water is a student-directed learning experience. However, while students are expected to work through the lesson on their own, teachers should be available to keep the lesson on track, organize groupings, facilitate discussions, answer questions, and ensure that all learning goals are met. Teacher’s Guide: Tiktaalik: A Fish Out of Water 1 The following is a summary of the lesson screens: Screen 1: Students learn that they will explore evolutionary relationships between animal groups that do not appear to be related.
    [Show full text]