DOCSLIB.ORG

SALW Survey of Moldova

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SALW Survey of Moldova SALW Survey of Moldova Briceni M o l d o v a Edinți Balți Ribnița Falesti Dubasari CHIȘINAU Bender ROMANIA Tiraspol Leova UKRAINE Chaul South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons ISBN 86-7728-015-4 9 7 8 8 6 7 7 2 8 0 1 5 4 SEESAC Internacionalnih Brigada 56, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse Tel. (+381) (11) 344 6353 / Fax. (+381) (11) 344 6356 for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons URL: www.seesac.org / Email: [email protected] SALW Survey of Moldova (2006-07-01) The South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC) has a mandate from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe (SCSP) to further support all international and national stakeholders by strengthening national and regional capacity to control and reduce the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons, and thus contribute to enhanced stability, security and development in South Eastern and Eastern Europe. For further information contact: Head, SEESAC Internacionalnih Brigada 56 11000 Belgrade Serbia Tel: (+381) (11) 344 6353 Fax: (+381) (11) 344 6356 www.seesac.org SALW Survey of Moldova, SEESAC 2006 Acknowledgements The report was researched jointly by Zachary Taylor and David Wood of Saferworld and by Viorel Cibotaru, Iurie Pintea and Ana Rudico of the Chişinău based Institute for Public Policy (IPP). The report was written by David Wood and was edited and project managed by Simon Rynn and Henry Smith of Saferworld, with additional editorial support provided by Anna Richards of Saferworld. The Household Survey and Focus Groups were conducted by Chişinău-based CBS-AXA and support organising civil society interviews was provided by the NGO Contact Centre. The contents of the SALW Survey were discussed with the contributing ministries and agencies of the Government of the Republic of Moldova during December 2005 and disseminated for final feedback and consultation in March 2006. The report was researched between September 2005 and January 2006. Oversight, copy editing and project management were provided by Adrian Wilkinson and Anya Hart-Dyke of SEESAC. Extensive factual and editorial contributions were provided by the OSCE Mission in Chişinău and UNDP Moldova. Graphic design and layout was conducted by Katarina Stankovic Bjegovic. SEESAC 2006 – All rights reserved ISBN: 86-7728-014-6 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Union, the United Nations Development Programme or the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of the European Union, the United Nations Development Programme or the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe concerning 1) the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities or armed groups; or 2) concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. SALW Survey of Moldova (2006-07-01) Acronyms and abbreviations ADGT Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies ATT Arms Trade Treaty BAFA Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (Germany) BGS Border Guard Service BGT Border Guard Troops BUMAD Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova Anti-Drugs Programme CAA Civil Aviation Authority CDPP Christian Democratic People’s Party CFE Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CPM Communist Party of Moldova CSBM Confidence and Security Building Measures CSO Civil Society Organisation DCOC Department for Combating Organised Crime DoPO Department of Public Order DMR Dniestrian Moldovan Republic EC European Commission ENP European Neighbourhood Policy EU European Union EU CoC EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports EUSR European Special Representative FDI Foreign Direct Investment FGD Focus Group Discussion FSU Former Soviet Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GUAM Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova (political organisation) HFAM Hunting and Fishing Association of Moldova HHS Household Survey ICC Interdepartmental Control Commission ICD International Classification of Diseases ICG International Crisis Group IDP Internally Displaced Person(s) IOM International Organisation for Migration ISD Internal Security Division IPP Institute for Public Policy IPAP Individual Partnership Action Plan IWPR Institute of War and Peace Reporting JCC Joint Control Commission JMC Joint Military Command JPKF Joint Peace Keeping Forces KII Key Informant Interview MANPADS Man-Portable Air Defence System i SALW Survey of Moldova (2006-07-01) MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration MIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MoD Ministry of Defence MoE Ministry of Economy and Commerce MoH Ministry of Health MoJ Ministry of Justice MoR Ministry of Reintegration MoU Memorandum of Understanding NAMSA NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NCB National Control Bureau (INTERPOL liaison office) NFP National Focal Point NGO Non-Governmental Organisation OGRF Operational Group of Russian Forces OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PCA EU Partnership and Co-operation Agreement PDGC Private Detective and Guard Companies PfP Partnership for Peace PMC OSCE Voluntary Fund Programme Management Cell PMR Pridnestrovskaya Moldovskaya Respublika PoAUN Programme of Action to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects RPG Rocket Propelled Grenade launcher RPK Ruchnoi Pulemet Kalashnikova/ Kalashnikov light machine gun PSC Private Security Company RAAS Rocket and Artillery Armament Section RACVIAC Regional Arms Control and Verification Implementation Assistance Centre RF Russian Federation RMDS/G Regional Micro-Disarmament Standards/Guidelines SAA Small Arms Ammunition SALW Small Arms and Light Weapons SECI Southeast European Cooperative Initiative SEE Southeast Europe SEESAC South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of SALW SGS State Guard Service SIS Information and Security Service SKS Samozaradny Karabin Symonova (self-loading carbine system) SSR Security Sector Reform SSRM Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldova UN United Nations UNDDA United Nations Department for Disarmament Affairs UNDP United Nations Development Programme UXO Unexploded Ordnance USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics WTO World Trade Organisation ii SALW Survey of Moldova (2006-07-01) Executive Summary Background The SALW Survey of Moldova is a report on Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) and human security issues in Moldova, researched by the non-governmental organisations Saferworld (UK) and the Institute for Public Policy (Moldova) between September 2005 and January 2006. The report is comprehensive in scope, considering not only the distribution of SALW in the country, but also its impact on individuals, communities and the state, public attitudes and perceptions towards arms and security, and the capacity of state institutions to control the proliferation and misuse of SALW. In order to aid policy-makers in developing effective responses to the SALW control challenges facing Moldova at this time, periodic consultation meetings were organised in late 2005 by the Survey team as part of the research process so that officials from the Moldovan Government, the Transdniestrian authorities and international organisations might review preliminary research findings and comment on them. The views expressed during these consultations are reflected in the final research report. They have also informed the recommendations offered to the Moldovan Government by the Survey team in a separate document. In the same way that the research methods for this study were chosen to reflect the situation as it presently exists, the format of the final report also reflects the constitutional and conflict realities of contemporary Moldova. The Survey is divided into three sections, with the situations in the Gagauz Yeri autonomous region, Transdniestria and the Security Zone (a jointly-administered demilitarised area along the internal border) and the remaining territory controlled by the internationally recognised Government of Moldova, each presented separately. This format and the research that has been undertaken by the Survey team does not in any way support or contest the legality of the administration in Transdniestria, but simply reflects the SALW control realities on the ground. Introduction Moldova has undergone one of the more difficult and uneven transition processes of all post-soviet republics. In part, this has been due to the country’s uncertain political direction, positioned as it is between an expanding European Union to the west and Russia and the Ukraine to the east. It is, however, the internal conflicts that took place in the early 1990s in the Gagauz and Transdniestrian regions of the country that have impeded transition and reform to the greatest degree. Indeed, while a political agreement has since been reached on the autonomy of Gagauz Yeri, settlement of the conflict in Transdniestria has proved elusive. As a result, a politically separate entity, the ‘Dniestrian Moldovan Republic’ (DMR), endowed with its own armed forces and a functioning government administration has now been established within Moldova’s internationally recognised borders for most of the post-soviet period. Failure to resolve the Transdniestrian conflict has meant that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chechnya (1999-2006)
    chechnya (1999-2006) RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND CHECHEN REPUBLIC OF ICHKERIA ARMY WEAPONS TABLE Range Close Normal Long Extreme Rate of Type Characteristics 20cm 40cm 60cm 80cm Fire Tokarev TT Pistol +1d6 NE NE NE 2 melee GSh-18 (9mm) Pistol +1d6 NE NE NE 2 melee AK-74M Assault Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 - 3 assault weapon AKS-74U Assault Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 - 3 assault weapon, short weapon AK102 or AK105 Assault +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 - 3 assault weapon, short weapon Rifle assault weapon, packs a punch, AK104 Assault Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 3 short weapon assault weapon, packs a punch, OC-14 Assault Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 3 short weapon, silent weapon assault weapon, packs a punch, SR-3M Assault Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 3 short weapon Dragunov SVD Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 2 packs a punch, unlimited range packs a punch, silent weapon, VSS .9x39 Rifle +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 2 unlimited range RPK-47 Light Machine ammunition belt, packs a punch, +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 4 gun support weapon RPKM-74 Light Machine +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 4 ammunition belt, support weapon gun PK Medium Machine ammunition belt, packs a punch, +2d6 +1d6 +1d6 +1d6 7 gun support weapon, unlimited range ammunition belt, cumbersome, DShk 12.7mm Heavy +2d6 +2d6 +2d6 +1d6 7 packs a punch, support weapon, Machine gun unlimited range ammunition belt, cumbersome, NSV 12.7mm Heavy +2d6 +2d6 +2d6 +1d6 7 packs a punch, support weapon, Machine gun unlimited range devastating, indirect fire, minimum RGD-5 Grenades +1d6 NE NE NE 1 (A5) range 10, single shot devastating, indirect fire, minimum GP-25
    [Show full text]
  • WCC Moldova Partnership Program Report on Activities for 2003-2004
    WCC Moldova Partnership Program Report on activities for 2003-2004 Chisinau, 2005 Content I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 3 1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION ........................................................................................................... 3 2. POPULATION ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. CHURCHES REPRESENTED ........................................................................................................ 4 II. MOLDOVA PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME ............................................................................. 7 1. BRIEF HISTORY OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................... 7 2. MOLDOVAN PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM INITIATIVES 2003-2004. ..................................... 10 III. SUMMARY OF PROJECT REPORTS ..................................................................................... 17 1. SOCIAL PROTECTION HUB ...................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 17 PARTNERS’ INITIATIVES IMPLEMENTED: ............................................................................................. 18 MO/002 -Soup Kitchen for elderly people ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • E-Journal, Year IX, Issue 176, October 1-31, 2011
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Policy Documentation Center Governance and democracy in Moldova e-journal, year IX, issue 176, October 1-31, 2011 "Governance and Democracy in Moldova" is a bi-weekly journal produced by the Association for Participatory Democracy ADEPT, which tackles the quality of governance and reflects the evolution of political and democratic processes in the Republic of Moldova. The publication is issued with financial support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, in framework of the project "Promoting Good Governance through Monitoring". Opinions expressed in the published articles do not necessarily represent also the point of view of the sponsor. The responsibility for the veracity of statements rests solely with the articles' authors. CONTENTS I. ACTIVITY OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS........................................................................................................ 3 GOVERNMENT ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Events of major importance ...................................................................................................................... 3 Premier’s report regarding assaults on share stocks of some banks ........................................................ 3 2. Nominations. Dismissals ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Norvinsk Region, a Special Economic Zone That Served As Both
    In the Norvinsk Region, a special economic zone that served as both a bridge between Russia and Europe as well as an excellent location for international companies to do business, a Britain-based corporation called Terra Group began conducting illegal experiments under the guise of creating “new, cutting edge technologies.” When the Russian government began to investigate Terra Group hired a PMC known as USEC (United Security) to act as their proxy private army to disrupt any investigations on their activities. With traditional methods exhausted and their hands legally tied the Russian government took a new approach and secretly created a PMC of their own, known as BEAR, who could successfully combat USEC while keeping their hands clean. It was soon discovered that some elements of the local government also had a hand in Terra Group’s activities by hiding their facilities and officially slating the new USEC forces as being used for “agricultural and mining security”. The Russian government began to believe that these activities were a genuine threat to national security and therefore invested a great deal of resources into BEAR. USEC and BEAR soon came to blows all across the region, the fighting intensifying to the point where a six month political scandal resulted in the involvement of the UN, who soon proved to be ineffective against either side. Eventually, the Norvinsk Region was evacuated by the majority of the civilians who had made their homes there due to the incredible danger that resulted from these battles. Yes, just most of them. Some were ​ ​ unable to leave in time, but some willingly stayed behind in the now mostly lawless area.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Military Presence in Moldova – a Sensitive Issue for the Future of Relations Between Chișinău and Moscow
    RUSSIAN MILITARY PRESENCE IN MOLDOVA – A SENSITIVE ISSUE FOR THE FUTURE OF RELATIONS BETWEEN CHIȘINĂU AND MOSCOW Ion TĂBÂRȚĂ The presidential elections in the Republic of Moldova are barely over, and the first divergences between the future President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu – on one hand, and the Kremlin administration – on the other hand, are already foreshadowed. Some statements by Sandu regarding the presence of Russian military troops, illegally stationed on the left bank of the Dniester, and which statements in fact reiterated Chisinău's official stance on this matter, as it was known before the Ion Chicu government, disturbed Moscow and provoked its negative reaction. The statements of the president-elect Maia Sandu Shortly after winning the presidential term on November 15, 2020, Maia Sandu, stated in an interview with the Ukrainian daily Evropeiskaya Pravda, that resolving the Transnistrian conflict presupposes the complete withdrawal of Russian troops from Moldova. These statements by Sandu have immediately provoked negative reactions in Moscow. Russian officials have labeled the scenario proposed by the future president of the Republic of Moldova as a return to the year 1992, and as something to which those in Tiraspol will never agree. The outgoing president of the Republic of Moldova, Igor Dodon, also reacted to Maia Sandu's statements, which he stated were a serious mistake1. Later, on November 30, 2020, at a press conference, Maia Sandu came with clarifications of her position on the Russian military presence on the left bank of the Dniester. Asked by the NTV Moldova correspondent whether, as a president, she will opt for the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers, Sandu specified that the Russian army, deployed on the left bank of the Dniester, is divided into the Operational Group of Russian Forces in Transnistria (OGRF), whose presence on the territory of the Republic of Moldova has no legal status, and the peacekeeping mission, stationed in the Transnistrian region in accordance with the Moldovan-Russian agreement of July 21, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • S/2003/223 Security Council
    United Nations S/2003/223 Security Council Distr.: General 25 March 2003 Original: English Letter dated 25 March 2003 from the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia addressed to the President of the Security Council On behalf of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia, and in accordance with paragraph 11 of Security Council resolution 1425 (2002), I have the honour to transmit herewith the report of the Panel of Experts mandated to collect independent information on violations of the arms embargo on Somalia and to provide recommendations on possible practical steps and measures for implementing it. In this connection, the Committee would appreciate it if this letter together with its enclosure were brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Stefan Tafrov Chairman Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia 03-25925 (E) 210303 *0325925* S/2003/223 Letter dated 24 February 2003 from the Panel of Experts to the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia We have the honour to enclose the report of the Panel of Experts on Somalia, in accordance with paragraph 11 of Security Council resolution 1425 (2002). (Signed) Ernst Jan Hogendoorn (Signed) Mohamed Abdoulaye M’Backe (Signed) Brynjulf Mugaas 2 S/2003/223 Report of the Panel of Experts on Somalia pursuant to Security Council resolution 1425 (2002) Contents Paragraphs Page Abbreviations ................................................................. 5 Summary ..................................................................... 6 Introduction ......................................................... 1–13 11 Background to the current instability in Somalia ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Guarantee Options for a Settlement of the Conflict Over Transnistria
    Guarantee Options for a Settlement of the Conflict over Transnistria Stefan Wolff ECMI WORKING PAPER #51 November 2011 ECMI- Working Paper The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI’s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of interethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethnopolitical tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Tove H. Malloy © ECMI 2011 2 | P a g e ECMI- Working Paper Guarantee Options for a Settlement of the Conflict over Transnistria Any meaningful consideration of guarantee options requires some assumptions about the nature of the underlying settlement. With this in mind, the following discussion draws on comparative experience in two ways. First, it considers the nature of the conflict over Transnistria in a broader context of similar conflicts elsewhere in order to establish the likely dimensions of a settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Transnistria UNISCI Discussion Papers, Núm
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España Popescu, Nico The EU and Transnistria UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 10, enero, 2006, pp. 247-254 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76701015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI DISCUSSION PAPERS Nº 10 (Enero / January 2006) THE EU AND TRANSNISTRIA AUTHOR:1 NICO POPESCU Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels Introduction EU thinking, assessments and policies towards the conflict in Transnistria have evolved quickly. The turning point towards a more active role occurred in late 2002. Since then, the EU has stepped up its attention and actions. The EU now raises constantly the Transnistria issue in relations with Russia and Ukraine. The Union has also used an array of CFSP instruments to support the conflict resolution process – these have included appointing a EU Special Representative, introducing a travel ban against the Transnistrian leadership, as well as envisaging common actions under its ENP Action Plans with Moldova and Ukraine on conflict resolution in Transnistria. 1. Why More EU Engagement? First, because of enlargement. A 2002 Commission paper on EU approaches to Moldova stated: ‘Moldova’s stability clearly matters to the EU. Within a few years, Moldova will be on the borders of an enlarged EU. It has been destabilised by weak government, armed conflict and secession, near economic collapse, organised crime and emigration […] The EU needs to help Moldova address these problems’2.
    [Show full text]
  • A 3D Tour Handgun History Dan Lovy
    A 3D Tour Handgun History Dan Lovy I have a new toy, a 3D printer. I am amazed at the level of quality compared to its price. I'm printing out robots, cartoon characters and as many Star Trek ship models as I can find. The darn thing is running almost 24/7 and all my shelving is filling up with little plastic objects. First let me state that I am not a gun enthusiast. I own no fire arms and have been to a firing range once in my life. I believe that we have too many and they are too accessible, especially in the U.S. That having been said, I also have a fascination with the technological change that occurred during the industrial revolution. In some ways we are still advancing the technology that was developed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Fire arms, especially handguns, offer a unique window into all this. Advancement did not happen through increased complexity. A modern Glock is not much more complex than a Colt 1911. The number of parts in a pistol has been in the same range for nearly 200 years. Cars on the other hand gained complexity and added system after system. Advancement did not happen through orders of magnitude in performance. A 747 is vastly more capable than the Wright Flyer. One of the basic measures of a pistol is how fast can it shoot a bullet, that parameter has not really changed much, certainly not as much as the top speed of a car.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT BITCHES and THIEVES: GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, and PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS in the BITCHES' WAR by Adam Richard
    ABSTRACT BITCHES AND THIEVES: GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS IN THE BITCHES’ WAR by Adam Richard Rodger Amongst the professional criminals imprisoned in the Soviet Gulag, a split developed between those who kept to the Thieves’ Law and those who broke the Law and collaborated with the State. This violent schism, the Bitches’ War, raged across the entire Gulag system, becoming most heated between 1948 and 1953, and implicated the camps’ guards and administrators as much as the prisoners themselves. This research examines primary and secondary sources, heavily incorporating Gulag survivor memoirs, to investigate the culture of the Thieves-in-Law, these professional criminals, and also to uncover the involvement, intentions, and guilt of the camp administration. This study argues that the Bitches’ War sheds light on the real purpose and function of the Gulag; that it was not primarily about ideological re-education, nor was it primarily about economics and production, but that the Gulag served as a model for social control through use of power, persuasion, and violence. BITCHES AND THIEVES: GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS IN THE BITCHES’ WAR Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of Master’s Degree by Adam Richard Rodger Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2017 Advisor: Dr. Stephen Norris Reader: Dr. Dan Prior Reader: Dr. Scott Kenworthy ©2017 Adam Richard Rodger This thesis titled BITCHES AND THIEVES GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS IN THE BITCHES’ WAR by Adam Richard Rodger has been approved for publication by The College of Arts and Sciences and The Department of History ____________________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRAȚIA PUBLICĂ: Prin Reformare Spre Modernizare
    U N I V E R S I T A T E A D E S T A T D I N M O L D O V A Facultatea de Relații Internaționale, Științe Politice și Administrative Catedra Științe Administrative Aurel SÎMBOTEANU ADMINISTRAȚIA PUBLICĂ: prin reformare spre modernizare Culegere de studii Chișinău, 2013 CEP USM CZU Recomandată spre editare de Catedra Ştiinţe Administrative și de Comisia de Asigurare a Calității din cadrul Facultăţii de Relaţii Internaţionale, Ştiinţe Politice şi Administrative a Universităţii de Stat din Moldova Recenzenți: Constantin Solomon, doctor habilitat în științe politice, profesor universitar Igor Bucataru, doctor în științe politice, conferențiar universitar Sîmboteanu, Aurel. Administraţia publică: prin reformare spre modernizare: Culeg. de studii / Aurel Sîmboteanu; Univ. de Stat din Moldova, Fac. de Relaţii Intern., Ştiinţe Politice şi Administrative, Catedra Ştiinţe Administrative. – Ch.: CEP USM. – 348 p. Bibliogr.: p. 346. – 50 ex. ISBN 978-9975-71-349-8. 351/354(075) S 56 © Aurel Sîmboteanu, 2013 © USM, 2013 CUPRINS Prefață ................................................................................................................. 5 Preface .................................................................................................................. 6 Предисловие ...................................................................................................... 7 Reforma administrației publice și rolul personalului în desfășurarea ei ............. 9 Principiile autoadministrării în contextul democrației locale ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • SALW Survey of Moldova
    SALW Survey of Moldova Briceni M o l d o v a Edinți Balți Ribnița Falesti Dubasari CHIȘINAU Bender ROMANIA Tiraspol Leova UKRAINE Chaul South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons ISBN 86-7728-015-4 9 7 8 8 6 7 7 2 8 0 1 5 4 SEESAC Internacionalnih Brigada 56, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse Tel. (+381) (11) 344 6353 / Fax. (+381) (11) 344 6356 for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons URL: www.seesac.org / Email: [email protected] SALW Survey of Moldova (2006-07-01) The South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC) has a mandate from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe (SCSP) to further support all international and national stakeholders by strengthening national and regional capacity to control and reduce the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons, and thus contribute to enhanced stability, security and development in South Eastern and Eastern Europe. For further information contact: Head, SEESAC Internacionalnih Brigada 56 11000 Belgrade Serbia Tel: (+381) (11) 344 6353 Fax: (+381) (11) 344 6356 www.seesac.org SALW Survey of Moldova, SEESAC 2006 Acknowledgements The report was researched jointly by Zachary Taylor and David Wood of Saferworld and by Viorel Cibotaru, Iurie Pintea and Ana Rudico of the Chişinău based Institute for Public Policy (IPP). The report was written by David Wood and was edited and project managed by Simon Rynn and Henry Smith of Saferworld, with additional editorial support provided by Anna Richards of Saferworld.
    [Show full text]