Whose Resources? Whose Common Good?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whose Resources? Whose Common Good? Whose Resources? Whose Common Good? Towards a New Paradigm of Environmental Justice and the National Interest in Indonesia Center for International Environment Law (CIEL) In collaboration with HuMa Perkumpulan untuk Pembaruan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis (Association for Community and Ecologically-Based Law Reform) Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM) (Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy), Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (ICEL), and International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) January 2002 Copyright page CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................... vii Map of Case Study Locations ............................................ xiii Preface ...................................................................................xv List of Acronyms ................................................................ xix Glossary ............................................................................. xxiii Introduction: Natural Resources and Indonesia’s Budding Democracy .......................................................................... xxv Old States, Old Assumptions................................................ xxvii Summary of the Report .........................................................xxix Notes.......................................................................................xxxi I. Community-Based Property Rights: A Conceptual Note ..................................................................................... 1 Defining Community-Based Property Rights ............................ 3 Decentralization and Community-Based Property Rights ........ 6 Legal Recognition of Community-Based Property Rights ......... 7 Rethinking Property Rights......................................................... 8 Private Community-Based Property Rights ............................. 10 CBPR Tenure Instruments and Legal Personalities ................. 13 Promoting Enterprise Development ........................................ 14 Summary.................................................................................... 15 Notes.......................................................................................... 16 II. Unity in Diversity? Colonial and Post-Colonial Legal Legacies ............................................................................ 19 Village Governance under the Dutch State ............................. 20 iii WHOSE RESOURCES? WHOSE COMMON GOOD? Colonial Usurpation and Local Responses .............................. 21 Domain Declarations and the Agrarian Law of 1870 .............. 23 Redefining Territory and Resource Rights ............................... 25 Redefining the Village and Increasing State Intervention Following Independence ......................................................... 26 Independence, Adat, and the Constitution ............................. 31 Legal Recognition of Adat CBPRs Under Existing Laws ......... 32 New Order Resource Management and the New Domain Declarations .............................................................................. 35 Forest Resources (Including Estate Crops and Protected Areas) ........................................................................................ 36 Mining and Mineral Resources ................................................. 38 Fisheries and Coastal and Marine Resources .......................... 39 Perceptions and Uses of Natural Resources ............................ 42 Notes.......................................................................................... 44 III. In the Shadow of the State: National Law and Community-Based Institutions ....................................... 49 Factors Influencing Local Community/State Interactions ....... 50 Landscapes: Livelihoods and Markets ............................... 51 Mobility and Relations with Neighbors ............................. 52 Local Leadership ................................................................. 58 Types of Conflict....................................................................... 59 Timber and Plantations ...................................................... 59 Conservation and Tourism Development ......................... 64 Mining ................................................................................. 65 Marine and Coastal Resources ........................................... 67 Adverse Impacts of State-Controlled Resource Management .............................................................................. 71 Local Community-Based Management Capacities .................. 73 Notes.......................................................................................... 77 IV. Local Initiatives as Precedents for Recognition of Community Rights ........................................................... 83 Local Government Recognition of CBPRs and Local Management Practices .............................................................. 84 Recognition of Community Land-Use Systems in Spatial Plans .................................................................................... 85 Incorporation of Village Maps into Sub-Districts.............. 86 iv CONTENTS Recognition of Rattan Gardens Management Systems ..... 91 Declaration of Protected Area Community-Managed Zones ......................................................................................... 91 Lorentz National Park, West Papua ................................... 91 Tangkoko Nature Reserve, North Sulawesi ...................... 93 Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi...................... 94 Meru-Betiri National Park, East Java ................................. 95 Conflicts with Extraction: Recognition of Community Conflicts with Extraction: Recognition of Community Management Agreements ....................................................... 100 Tanggerang, Ketapang District, West Kalimantan .......... 100 Balai Semandang, Ketapang District, West Kalimantan ........................................................................ 101 Resak Balai and Tapang Sambas-Tapang Kemayau, Sanggau District, West Kalimantan .................................. 101 Empetai, Sanggau District, West Kalimantan .................. 102 Kotup, West Kalimantan .................................................. 102 Menjalin, West Kalimantan............................................... 102 Nain, North Sulawesi........................................................ 103 Building for the Future ........................................................... 104 Notes........................................................................................ 104 V. New States…New Assumptions? ................................... 107 Decentralization and Community Rights in the Post- Suharto Era .............................................................................. 111 The Forestry Bureaucracy ...................................................... 116 State Forests or Community Forests? ..................................... 118 Harbingers of Substantive Reform? ........................................ 120 Revised Basic Forestry Law .................................................... 123 Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples ................................ 124 Negotiating Options for Local Communities within “State Forests” .................................................................................... 127 Community Territorial Enclaves within State Forests ........... 128 Summary: The Past Not Yet Passed ....................................... 129 Notes........................................................................................ 129 VI. Towards a New Paradigm of Environmental Justice and the National Interest .............................................. 137 Whose Development? Whose Common Good? .................... 138 v WHOSE RESOURCES? WHOSE COMMON GOOD? Towards a New Paradigm of Environmental Justice ............ 139 Reinterpreting the Indonesian Constitution: Articles 18 and 33 ...................................................................................... 141 On-the-Ground Delineation of State Lands ........................... 145 Not by Adat Alone .................................................................. 148 Innovative Opportunities to Link CBPRs and Conservation ........................................................................... 150 Notes........................................................................................ 152 Conclusion ........................................................................... 155 About the Authors ............................................................... 159 Literature Cited .................................................................... 161 Appendix 1. Possible Forest Tenure Arrangements ........ 183 Appendix 2. Possible Arrangements for Community Rights in Natural Resource Management ............... 187 Appendix 3. Challenges of Adat Recognition: Notes from the Field ........................................................ 189 List of Boxes Box 1. Yosepha Alomang and Freeport McMoRan ...................... 39 Box 2. Treasures of the Forest, Bought with Blood (and How Manhattan Became English) .............................................. 54 Box 3: Rio Tinto: Global Operator and Global Compact Violator................................................................................ 67 Box 4. Community Mapping: Protecting CBPRs and Local Cultures ..............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Concise Ancient History of Indonesia.Pdf
    CONCISE ANCIENT HISTORY OF INDONESIA CONCISE ANCIENT HISTORY O F INDONESIA BY SATYAWATI SULEIMAN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION JAKARTA Copyright by The Archaeological Foundation ]or The National Archaeological Institute 1974 Sponsored by The Ford Foundation Printed by Djambatan — Jakarta Percetakan Endang CONTENTS Preface • • VI I. The Prehistory of Indonesia 1 Early man ; The Foodgathering Stage or Palaeolithic ; The Developed Stage of Foodgathering or Epi-Palaeo- lithic ; The Foodproducing Stage or Neolithic ; The Stage of Craftsmanship or The Early Metal Stage. II. The first contacts with Hinduism and Buddhism 10 III. The first inscriptions 14 IV. Sumatra — The rise of Srivijaya 16 V. Sanjayas and Shailendras 19 VI. Shailendras in Sumatra • •.. 23 VII. Java from 860 A.D. to the 12th century • • 27 VIII. Singhasari • • 30 IX. Majapahit 33 X. The Nusantara : The other islands 38 West Java ; Bali ; Sumatra ; Kalimantan. Bibliography 52 V PREFACE This book is intended to serve as a framework for the ancient history of Indonesia in a concise form. Published for the first time more than a decade ago as a booklet in a modest cyclostyled shape by the Cultural Department of the Indonesian Embassy in India, it has been revised several times in Jakarta in the same form to keep up to date with new discoveries and current theories. Since it seemed to have filled a need felt by foreigners as well as Indonesians to obtain an elementary knowledge of Indonesia's past, it has been thought wise to publish it now in a printed form with the aim to reach a larger public than before.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE and the REMEDIATION of LAND Emma Lees* Keywords: Contamination, Environmental Liability, Polluter Pa
    THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE AND THE REMEDIATION OF LAND Emma Lees* Keywords: contamination, environmental liability, polluter pays principle Abstract The Environmental Liability Directive attempts to provide a harmonising framework for liability for environmental damage within the European Union on the basis of the polluter pays principle. This article considers legislation in place in the Member States which sit alongside provisions based on the ELD. It shows that such regimes rely on different models for liability, which require, in turn, fundamentally different understandings as to how the polluter pays principle can work as a principle of liability. It considers provisions in place in Denmark, the United Kingdom, the Walloon Region, the Netherlands, and Germany. The differences between these systems are not differences of degree, nor are they mere technicalities, rather they represent a significant challenge not only to the goals of the ELD, but to the principles underpinning it. By undertaking a comparative analysis of these systems, it becomes clear not only that the ELD sits uncomfortably with these “parallel” provisions, but also that this discomfort is not only one of overlapping and complex legislative provisions, but rather one of underlying justification for liability. ‘The purpose of the Environmental Liability Directive (“ELD”) is to establish a framework of environmental liability, based on the ‘polluter-pays’ principle, to prevent and remedy environmental damage’ (European Commission, 2006, p. 1; A. Waite, 2006, p. 67). This goal is threatened by the variation in Member State liability for remediation of land which sits alongside the ELD in the Member States. When the legislation in Member States relating to contaminated land is examined, it becomes clear that the Member States prefer to extend liability beyond the liability of the polluter.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of ATTORNEYS the U.S. Embassy Jakarta, Indonesia
    Page 1 of 12 LIST OF ATTORNEYS The U.S. Embassy Jakarta, Indonesia assumes no responsibility or liability for the professional ability or reputation of, or the quality of services provided by, the following persons or firms. Inclusion on this list is in no way an endorsement by the Department of State or the U.S. Embassy/Consulate. Names are listed alphabetically, and the order in which they appear has no other significance. The information in the list on professional credentials, areas of expertise and language ability are provided directly by the lawyers. AFDHAL & DEDY LAW FIRM Address: Jl. KS Tubun III No. 20, Slipi, Jakarta Barat 11410 Telephone: (62-21) 5306885, Afdhal Muhammad +62 81381530266 or +62 87877823300; Fax: +62 21 53652210. E-mail: [email protected] ANDRYAWAL SIMANJUNTAK & PARTNERS Address: Komplek. Kejaksaan Agung, Blok : A1 No. 23, JL. Cipunagara I, Ciputat 15411. Telephone: (62-21) 99560888, (62)81399960888; Web site: www.andryawal.blogspot.com E-mail : [email protected] Expertise: This law firm’s area practice include litigation, non litigation, bankruptcy, corporate, commercial, labour, capital & finance, banking, criminal law, family law, administration law, immigration, foreign investment, land matter. ARMILA & RAKO Address: Suite 12-C, 12th Floor, Lippo Kuningan, Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav.12, Jakarta 12920 Telephone: +62 21 2911 0015; Mobile +62 811 935503; Fax: +62 21 2911 0016 Contact person: Michel A. Rako, e-maill: [email protected] List of membership: - Co-Chairman Commercial Law Commission of International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Indonesia - Vice Secretary General of the Indonesian Academy of Independent Mediators and Arbitrators (MedArbId) - Member of Indonesian BAR Association (PERADI) Expertise: Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Mining and Energy,Corporate and Commercial, Merger and Acquisition, Foreign Investment, Employment, Intellectual Property Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-Revolutionary Transformation of the Indonesian Army
    THE POST-REVOLUTIONARY TRANSFORMATION OF THE INDONESIAN ARMY Part II* Ruth McVey The rebellion of 1958 marked a turning point in the development of the Indonesian army, for it provided the central military leader­ ship with the means to establish its ascendancy over the officer corps. Had there been a compromise in the settlement of the insurrection, General Nasution might have continued for some time to inch his way toward control, in the manner in which we saw him progress during 1955-1956,* 1 and the relations between the army center and the power­ ful territorial commanders would have continued for some time to be roughtly equal. But the central military command moved with great success against the rebel forces, whose failure was apparent within six months of their revolt. This victory both eliminated Nasution’s principal rivals for army leadership and gave him great military prestige,with which he consolidated his personal position and re­ shaped the army's structure. Of even greater significance for the army’s ultimate role in Indonesia, the rebellion--or, to be more exact, the State of Emergency proclaimed in April 1957 in response to the regional crisis--allowed the military to expand its activities into the economic and political spheres. This expansion provided the army leadership with vital sources of finance and patronage, strengthening its position over the officer corps and enhancing the army's status in the society as a whole. The proliferation of the army's functions and of its members' contacts with civilian elements that resulted from this development increased the chances for extra-military alliances and civilian influence over individual officers, but in another and ultimately more important sense, it diminished army disunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Disaster Prepared School (Ssb) in West Pasaman District West Sumatera Province
    Proceedings of 4th UNP International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training November 09-11, 2017, Padang, Indonesia IMPLEMENTATION OF DISASTER PREPARED SCHOOL (SSB) IN WEST PASAMAN DISTRICT WEST SUMATERA PROVINCE Yuwalitas Gusmareta 1, Nurhasan Shah 2, Laras Andreas Oktavia 3, Rizki 4, Indra Utama Muvi Yandra 5 Department of Civil Engineering, Fakulty of Engineering, University of Padang e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Be some a region in West Sumatra prone disaster flood and soil landslide. Wrong only are the districts of West Pasaman which is disaster subscription area annually. One district in this district is a vulnerable area, especially landslide disaster. B aik landslides and flooding have the same potential cause casualties. Flood and landslide in West Pasaman regency can not be separated from the human influence that is not good in managing the environment at around their settlement. Awareness of environmental management should continue next with various programs. The program is called SSB (Disaster Alert School). SSB is a new program and still needs to be developed, especially in Pasaman West District. Some of Elementary School (SD) located in disaster-prone areas need sosialisation to achieve the goals discussed earlier. The whole district is a region that has many hills with houses and places of study in the form of elementary school in slope - the slope The hill is very necessary to prepare the next generation of the current-generation pre-disaster and post-disaster occur. This is done to anticipate the number casualties. Results research obtained is 12,8% of 49 respondents not yet understand about preparedness to disaster-related problem prevention to disaster flood and landslide.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemi Kingi by Brian Sheppard 9 Workshop Reflections by Brian Sheppard 11
    WORLD HERITAGE MANAGERS WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD HERITAGE MANAGERS WORKSHOP Tongariro National Park, New Zealand 26–30 October 2000 Contents/Introduction 1 WORLD HERITAGE MANAGERS WORKSHOP Cover: Ngatoroirangi, a tohunga and navigator of the Arawa canoe, depicted rising from the crater to tower over the three sacred mountains of Tongariro National Park—Tongariro (foreground), Ngauruhoe, and Ruapehu (background). Photo montage: Department of Conservation, Turangi This report was prepared for publication by DOC Science Publishing, Science & Research Unit, Science Technology and Information Services, Department of Conservation, Wellington; design and layout by Ian Mackenzie. © Copyright October 2001, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 0–478–22125–8 Published by: DOC Science Publishing, Science & Research Unit Science and Technical Centre Department of Conservation PO Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand Email: [email protected] Search our catalogue at http://www.doc.govt.nz 2 World Heritage Managers Workshop—Tongariro, 26–30 October 2000 WORLD HERITAGE MANAGERS WORKSHOP CONTENTS He Kupu Whakataki—Foreword by Tumu Te Heuheu 7 Hemi Kingi by Brian Sheppard 9 Workshop reflections by Brian Sheppard 11 EVALUATING WORLD HERITAGE MANAGEMENT 13 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Performance management and evaluation 15 Terry Bailey, Projects Manager, Kakadu National Park, NT, Australia Managing our World Heritage 25 Hugh Logan, Director General, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand Tracking the fate of New Zealand’s natural
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Egan, Michael. "Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: a Historiographic Review." Environment and History 8, No
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Egan, Michael. "Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: A Historiographic Review." Environment and History 8, no. 1 (February 2002): 21–41. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3107. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2002. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: A Historiographic Review MICHAEL EGAN1 Department of History Washington State University Pullman WA 99164-4030, USA Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT When a group of people is faced with both social and environmental subordina- tion, they are the victims of environmental injustice. This subordination is manifest in the disproportionate siting of environmental hazards in poor or minority communities and also in the inequitable distribution of ecological resources, both of which perpetuate the marginalisation of subaltern groups. At the heart of the environmental justice movement is a fight for the empowerment of subaltern groups, heretofore excluded from environmental decision-making. In recognising that the environmental health of their living spaces and families is critical to exacting any kind of improvement of their socioeconomic condi- tions, subaltern groups have added a dynamic new dimension to their social struggles. This counter-hegemonic struggle for ecological democracy is one of the fastest growing social movements in contemporary society, and requires the attention of environmental historians to situate it within the broader context of the history of environmentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of John Stuart Mill Chris Daly
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Honors Theses University Honors Program 5-2002 The Boundaries of Liberalism in a Global Era: A Critique of John Stuart Mill Chris Daly Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/uhp_theses Recommended Citation Daly, Chris, "The Boundaries of Liberalism in a Global Era: A Critique of John Stuart Mill" (2002). Honors Theses. Paper 131. This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. r The Boundaries of Liberalism in a Global Era: A Critique of John Stuart Mill Chris Daly May 8, 2002 r ABSTRACT The following study exanunes three works of John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Three Essays on Religion, and their subsequent effects on liberalism. Comparing the notion on individual freedom espoused in On Liberty to the notion of the social welfare in Utilitarianism, this analysis posits that it is impossible for a political philosophy to have two ultimate ends. Thus, Mill's liberalism is inherently flawed. As this philosophy was the foundation of Mill's progressive vision for humanity that he discusses in his Three Essays on Religion, this vision becomes paradoxical as well. Contending that the neo-liberalist global economic order is the contemporary parallel for Mill's religion of humanity, this work further demonstrates how these philosophical flaws have spread to infect the core of globalization in the 21 st century as well as their implications for future international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Higher Education to Public and Common Good(S), East and West
    Tsinghua University Institute of Education Seminar 1 on 21 June 2019 The contribution of higher education to public and common good(s), East and West Simon Marginson Department of Education, University of Oxford ESRC/HEFCE Centre for Global Higher Education Higher School of Economics, Moscow The problem of ‘public’ or ‘social’ goods in higher education We can think we can measure private goods associated with higher education, such as augmented earnings … (though the extent to which they are really caused by the higher education? that’s another story …) … but public good, or public goods, or ’social goods’, are more elusive, especially goods collectively consumed. These public goods tend to be under-recognised, and hence are probably under-funded and under-provided The contribution of higher education to public and common good(s), East and West • Contributions of higher education – individual and collective • Higher education as a public sphere • Higher education as public good(s) - Economic definition - Political definition - Combining the two definitions • Higher education as common good(s) • Global public and common good(s) in higher education • Concepts of ‘public’ and ‘common’ in China Mapping the contributions of higher education: Individualised and collective Individualised 1 Individualised national goods 2 Individualised global goods Greater agency freedom Cross-border mobility and Better social position employability Augmented earnings and Communications facility employment rates Knowledge of diverse Lifetime health and financial languages and cultures outcomes, etc Access to global science national global 3 Collective national goods 4 Collective global goods Ongoing development of Universal global science professions/occupations Diverse knowledge fields Shared social literacy, Common zone of free critical opportunity structure inquiry Inputs to government Systems for exchange, Stronger regions, cities collaboration, mobility collective 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Citizen's Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure
    A Citizen’s Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure Environmental Justice Copyright © 2002 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. ISBN No. 1-58576-033-1. ELI Project No. 981624. An electronically retrievable copy (PDF file) of this report may be obtained for no cost from the Environmental Law Institute web site <www.eli.org>, click on “Publications” then “2002 Research Reports” to locate the file. [Note: ELI Terms of Use will apply and are available on site.] (Environmental Law Institute®, The Environmental Forum®, and ELR® – The Environmental Law Reporter® are registered trademarks of the Environmental Law Institute.) acknowledgement This project was supported by the Office of Environmental Justice of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CR82675501. The views expressed herein should not be attributed to EPA nor should any official endorsement be inferred. table of contents Chapter 1. Introduction to Environmental Laws and Available Resources ...............................35 Environmental Justice Funding and Other Assistance for Public Participation. ..35 Other Grants . ......................... ......36 Introduction to Environmental Justice Issues.............1 Program Funding ..............................36 How Environmental Laws Can Help You to Protect Your Community ...............................3 How This Handbook Can Help You to Use Appendix A - Summary Descriptions of Selected Environmental Laws to Your Advantage...............4 Environmental Statutes..........................39 How This Handbook Is Organized, and What It Covers . 5 What This Handbook Does Not Cover.................6 Appendix B - Overview of Additional U.S. EPA Community Grant Programs .....................83 Chapter 2. Understanding the Players and the Laws Appendix C - Selected Other Environmental Justice Resources ...............................87 Identifying the Players..............................9 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]