DOCSLIB.ORG

Police National Computer Names Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Police National Computer Names Group RESTRICTED POLICE NATIONAL COMPUTER NAMES GROUP Minutes of the one hundred and forty second meeting held on Thursday 5th June 2014. At 09:30 at The Met Hotel, Leeds Persons Present Tina Watson TW Northumbria Police (Chair) Shaun Beresford SB ACRO (Secretary) Scott Gunn SG Leicestershire Police Vivien Jaymes VJ Merseyside Police Wendy Davies WD PNC Business Development Partner John Rice JR Home Office JOA SIS II Gavin Ireland GI Home Office Corporate Services Peter Smith PS PNC Services (SEG) Dave Low DL Metropolitan Police James Smart JS Police Scotland ************S40 BD PSNI Jess Maltby JM ACRO (Minute Taker) Apologies for absence David Senior DS HMIC Joanne Cawood JC College of Policing (ICTLP) Carolyn Leonard CL Avon & Somerset Police Raymond McIntyre RM Police Scotland Graham Parkes GO College of Policing (ICTLP) 1. Introduction TW welcomed all attendees and acknowledged apologies from DS, JC, CL, RM and GP. JS is representing Police Scotland in the absence of RM. TW advised that CL will no longer be attending PNG meetings due to her new role and that a new SW Region Representative will be identified in due course. On behalf of the group, TW thanked CL for her support to the PNG over years and the assistance she had provided in dealing with complex national issues. 2. Minutes of the previous meeting Minor spelling amendments were brought to attention. Page 4 – ‘met’ not ‘meet. Page 5 – should be ‘NPAs’ not ‘suppliers’ Page 7 – ‘e-borders’ not ‘e-boarders; Subject to amendment the minutes were agreed by the group and will be published on POLKA. Secretary’s Note: Minutes published on POLKA on 14th June 2014. RESTRICTED 1 RESTRICTED 3. Actions 133 5.1 - Not guilty by reason of insanity with guilty disposal DL confirmed that although all the disposal codes are available on the PNC there are some adjudication values that have not been assigned. DL to liaise with PS to address the deficiencies and to circulate a PNC LOL. Action: DL to liaise with PS and circulate PNC LOL. 137 5a - Update PNC processes for gender reassigned DL has completed the work required in respect to this action. The views of the PNG were fed back to the (old) National Policing Lead (NPL) for LGBT and to Everett Henry (College of Policing). Subject to approval of the new NPL for LGBT, the new guidelines will be circulated by LOL for use by forces. Updates for GR markers will be carried out by the Home Office Reconciliations Team. Action: Closed. 139 4a(2)(c) - CRQs which relate solely to third parties and PNG involvement This action relates to the group being unclear on whether the PNG were being asked to review and prioritise the work of PNCS/SEG in relation to decisions made in other PNC Working Groups (WG). DL has spoken with ************S40 and TW has sought clarity from ************S40 , Head of PNCS. The PNG is not being asked to prioritise CRQs raised by other PNC WG e.g. PIAP. Information about CRQs submitted by these groups is being shared by PNCS with the PNG for information purposes. Action: Closed. 139 4b(6) - Use of disposal code 2053 This will be addressed in agenda item 8e. 139 6c - Use of Disposal Code 3069 DL advised that the DBS has challenged some forces on the recording of text relating to the DBS in a PNC court disposal. This was also raised at the P4G by ************S40 This has been a long standing debate between the PNG and the MoJ Results Sub Group. SB stated that it is about how such information is recorded on PNC i.e. it’s not part of a sentence. If it’s recorded as part of the ‘sentence’ then it will appear on the criminal record certificates produced by the DBS. This matter has been discussed at a previous PNG meeting. JM to check the previous minutes from Meeting 139, August 2013 (see note below). Secretary’s Note: Extract from Minutes from meeting 139: The Courts under paragraph 25 of Schedule 3 to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act (SVGA) 2006 must inform the defendant upon their conviction for a relevant offence under the SVGA, that the person will or (as the case may be), may, be included in a Disclosure and Barring Service’s (DBS) list of people barred from working in regulated activity with children and/or list of people barred from working in regulated activity with adults. Consequently, as of 17th June 2013, Disqualification Orders (DOs) are no longer being issued by the courts. The court practice of adding text to the result “DBS adult barring may apply” was not deemed to be a result by the Results Sub Group. DL to raise the risk of not recording such text at the P4G. TW stated this is not a decision for the PNG and the DBS should take legal advice. Action: TW to write to ACC David Pryde. RESTRICTED 2 RESTRICTED 140 4a2(e) - Secure Dial WD advised that the PNC LOL has been circulated. Action: Closed. 140 4a7(b) - Additional offence added at court to go on DH page or generated via AS page This was discussed at a previous meeting (140). SG and DL briefly outlined the issue again. The B7 Solution currently adds additional offences via the DH page where it can and the asterix (*) is displayed. The solution will only be able to do this when the original offence(s) is still impending. The B7 Solution can not add an additional offence when it has been added following a previous hearing where an interim result was added to the original offence(s) as there is no longer an impending prosecution. Manual intervention is required to de-link and re-link accordingly in order to display the asterix. To prevent the lengthy manual intervention process of de-linking and re-linking on the DH page, additional offences can be added via the AS page however this does not display the asterix. If this method was adopted it would mean there would be a two tier approach in relation to recording additional offences on the PNC. Guidance was sought from the group regarding the necessity of displaying an (*) which indicates that there are additional offences on the DH page. VJ advised that she had raised this issue with her Region and they were in favour of displaying the (*) as this indicates there is court information. TW had an opposite response from her Region which was that displaying the (*) was deemed unnecessary. TW outlined the feedback and it was clear there was confusion towards the process. SG confirmed the NW Region’s understanding of the issue was incorrect. SB asked whether this was a conflict in guidance between the functional specification and the PNC Manual. SG advised that he adopts the approach from the PNC Manual but it is time consuming. TW asked what the benefits of displaying the (*) were. Who would know that the (*) indicates that the offence(s) was added at court. TW could not see any advantage in this. DL advised that it was a quick way of highlighting that additional offences had been added. SG stated that some change needs to happen to avoid inconsistency. The B7 consensus was that the (*) should be displayed as it shows the information came from court. DL suggested that a PNC LOL should be created by the B7 Group outlining that displaying the (*) offers small tangible benefits and there is a small issue with the data quality. The PNG are happy for forces to manage the process either way depending on available resources. TW said that she cannot see the tangible benefits and asked about the time and resources needed to make this happen. It’s not something that we can dictate and there is such a small difference in the quality of data. PS advised that complicated changes would need to be made to the B7/PNC interface. DL stated that this was a lot of work for little change. SB agreed but said that we should not discourage suggestions on how to bring about improvements that benefit the users of our systems. The group agreed that it was a ‘nice to have’. If a CRQ were to be submitted to PNC Customer Support it would attract a ‘Low’ priority meaning that work would only be done if the opportunity arises. Until then, it should be business as usual. Action: Closed. RESTRICTED 3 RESTRICTED 140 4a8 – PoFA DL provided the group with an update. The ‘Single Search’ guidance was published under PNC LOL 2014/017. Additional changes will take effect in September 2014. TW said there was a lack of guidance in relation to what was expected from forces. The PNC LOL from May 2014 advised that implementation into ‘Live’ was postponed until June 2014. However, timings have still not been confirmed by PNC Customer Support which prevents forces allocating resources to manage the change requirements. WD advised that the ‘Go Live’ was on Sunday 15th June. GI added that there maybe a valid reason why a time had not yet been confirmed. TW said that implanting the change on a Sunday had resource implications insofar as staff would have to come in to work on their day off? DL input that any updates on a record will be lost unless the work required is carried out. GI made a call and confirmed times to the group. It was agreed that these should be adjusted and the new date/time notified to forces. Action: WD to circulate revised dates and times via a PNC LOL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Serious and Organised Crime Strategy
    Serious and Organised Crime Strategy Cm 8715 Serious and Organised Crime Strategy Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty October 2013 Cm 8715 £21.25 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www. nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us [email protected] You can download this publication from our website at https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications ISBN: 9780101871525 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2593608 10/13 33233 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents Home Secretary Foreword 5 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 13 Our Strategic Response 25 PURSUE: Prosecuting and disrupting serious and 27 organised crime PREVENT: Preventing people from engaging 45 in serious and organised crime PROTECT: Increasing protection against 53 serious and organised crime PREPARE: Reducing the impact of serious and 65 organised crime Annex A: Accountability, governance and funding 71 Annex B: Departmental roles and responsibilities for 73 tackling serious and organised crime 4 Serious and Organised Crime Strategy Home Secretary Foreword 5 Home Secretary Foreword The Relentless Disruption of Organised Criminals Serious and organised crime is a threat to our national security and costs the UK more than £24 billion a year.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales
    User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales April 2017 Office for National Statistics About us Copyright and reproduction The Office for National Statistics © Crown copyright 2017 The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the executive You may re-use this information (not including logos) office of the UK Statistics Authority, a non-ministerial free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms department which reports directly to Parliament. ONS of the Open Government Licence. is the UK government’s single largest statistical producer. It compiles information about the UK’s To view this licence, go to: society and economy, and provides the evidence-base http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- for policy and decision-making, the allocation of government-licence resources, and public accountability. The Director- or write to the Information Policy Team, The National General of ONS reports directly to the National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU Statistician who is the Authority's Chief Executive and the Head of the Government Statistical Service. email: [email protected] The Government Statistical Service Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent The Government Statistical Service (GSS) is a network to: [email protected] of professional statisticians and their staff operating both within the Office for National Statistics and across This publication is available for download at: more than 30 other government departments and www.ons.gov.uk agencies. Contacts This publication For information
    [Show full text]
  • St 9617 2004 Dcl 1
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 November 2020 (OR. en) 9617/04 DCL 1 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 DECLASSIFICATION of document: 9617/04 RESTREINT UE dated: 17 May 2004 new status: LIMITE Subject: Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 9617/04 DCL 1 KAL SMART 2.C.S1 LIMITE EN RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 17 May 2004 THE EUROPEAN UNION 9617/04 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 NOTE from : UK delegation to : Schengen Evaluation Working Party No. prev. doc. : 9227/04 SCH-EVAL 25 COMIX 308 + ADD 1 Subject : Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK The United Kingdom has asked the Schengen Evaluation Group to undertake an evaluation of the data protection arrangements which it has in place to support the introduction of the Schengen Information System to the UK. As the UK’s technical solution to the SIS has not yet been finalised, the questions relate only to data protection arrangements. Questions relating to the management and handling of the data will be answered in the context of the full SIS evaluation which will take place once the UK’s national solution has been fully implemented. 1. Provide the list of services with access to SIS data See Annex A and Annex B 9617/04 WvdR/kve 1 DG H RESTREINT UE EN RESTREINT UE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Recovery Action Plan (
    GOV.UK 1. Home (https://www.gov.uk/) 2. Asset recovery action plan (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asset-recovery-action-plan) 1. Home Office (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office) Policy paper Asset Recovery Action Plan, accessible Updated 13 September 2019 Contents Ministerial Foreword Introduction Section 1: Legal Powers Section 2: Strengthening our Operational Response Section 3: Continuously Review and Embed Best Practice Section 4: Fostering Innovation and Collaboration Appendix A: table of actions © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3) or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asset-recovery-action- plan/asset-recovery-action-plan Ministerial Foreword Serious and organised crime is a threat to our national security. Money is the common thread that runs through almost all offending, as criminals use the proceeds of their crime to fund their lifestyle and conduct further crime. As set out in the Serious & Organised Crime Strategy (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/752850/SOC-2018- web.pdf) we are committed to working collaboratively with our partners and stakeholders to leave no safe space for those seeking to move, hide or use the proceeds of crime and corruption or to evade sanctions.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Annual Report of the MPS/MPA 2004-05
    Metropolitan Police Service and Metropolitan Police Authority Annual Report 2004/05 Contents Joint foreword by the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service and the Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority 3 Introduction 4 The priorities 5 Priority: Protecting the capital against terrorism 6 Objective: To minimise the risk to life and property from terrorist activity in London 6 Objective: To maintain an effective response to suspected and actual terrorist incidents 6 Priority: Reducing serious crime 10 Objective: To reduce the level of gun-enabled crime 10 Objective: To disrupt organised criminal activity of persons identified as Class A drugs suppliers 12 Objective: To dismantle organised criminal networks and seize their assets 13 Objective: To safeguard children and young persons from physical and sexual abuse 15 Priority: Promoting reassurance 16 Objective: To improve neighbourhood safety 16 Objective: To reduce the level of robbery compared with 2003/04 24 Objective: To improve our contribution to the criminal justice system 26 Objective: To recognise and respond appropriately to the differential impact of crime on people, taking into account their race, gender, sexual orientation, faith, age or disability 28 Supporting the priorities 34 Supporting the priorities 34 Managing our resources – the Directorate of Resources 37 Supporting our people – the Human Resources Directorate 41 Communicating our message – the Directorate of Public Affairs (DPA) 45 MPS financial performance 2004/05 45 The MPS response to the tsunami crisis 48 MPA review of performance 2004/05 50 MPA review of performance 2004/05 50 Performance indicators 2004/05 55 Performance tables 56 Objectives, measures and targets for 2005/06 61 Threatened/civil actions and damages paid 63 Police officers and police staff punished as a result of misconduct proceedings during 2004/05 64 Deaths following police contact during 2004/05 65 Alternative languages 66 Front cover: photo BRD Associates The assistance of the staff and students of Welling School, Bexley is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Records Review
    CRR Phase 2 Report A Common Sense Approach A review of the criminal records regime in England and Wales by Sunita Mason Independent Advisor for Criminality Information Management Report on Phase 2 1 Please note: All photographs used in this document are for illustrative purposes only. All persons depicted in the photographs are models. No connection is implied between those depicted and the actual roles and situations shown. Photo acknowledgment: iStockphoto LP Contents Preface 5 Executive Summary 6 Section 1: Definition & Recording 9 History of criminal records 10 Justification for keeping criminal records 11 Types of criminality information 11 Existing arrangements 15 A proposed working definition 15 Police information records 16 The concept of ‘recordable’ offences 16 Volumes of criminal offence convictions 17 Reconsidering the threshold for recordability 17 The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 19 Section 2: Management 22 The role and functions of the PNC 22 Data quality of PNC records 22 Is the PNC the only place to store records? 23 Options for the longer term 25 Strengthening the criminal records database 25 Microfiche records 25 Non-Police Prosecuting Agencies’ (NPPAs) records 26 Scotland’s and Northern Ireland’s criminal records 26 Storing police information records 27 Should criminal records ever be deleted? 27 Conviction records 27 Records of ‘out-of-court’ disposals - cautions, reprimands and warnings 29 Police information records 29 Could the administration of criminal records be made more straightforward, efficient and
    [Show full text]
  • Download Police Records: a Guide for Professionals
    Police Records: October A Guide for Professionals 2018 A guide to the organisations, guidance and laws that govern the keeping, sharing and use of police records held about an individual in England and Wales. By Alex Temple October 2018 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Glossary of Terms.................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 What this document covers .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 What this document does not cover ............................................................................................ 6 1.3 The meaning of “police records” .................................................................................................. 7 1.4 The meaning of “management” ................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Places where police records are kept ........................................................................................... 9 1.6 Spent and Unspent Convictions .................................................................................................. 12 1.7 Exemptions to the Rehabilitation
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Management, Gaming and Police Practice
    PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, GAMING AND POLICE PRACTICE A study of changing police behaviour in England and Wales during the era of New Public Management. By Rodger Patrick MSc. BA (Hons) A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Local Government Studies (INLOGOV) University of Birmingham January 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT: This thesis examines the nature of ‘gaming’ in the police service and the extent to which it distorts policing priorities and performance measures. Performance Management, which formed an integral part of New Public Management, was introduced gradually to the police service in England and Wales during the 1990s. The Police and Magistrates Court Act 1994 gave Chief Officers of Police greater freedom on how they spent their budget allocation but there was an expectation that this would result in increased efficiency and improved performance. The Police Reform Act 2002 continued this trend by empowering the Home Secretary to set annual performance targets which the Police Service was expected to deliver. Performance management systems provided the means by which efficiency could be measured thus enabling central government to exert pressure on police forces to improve performance in the areas prioritised.
    [Show full text]
  • HMIC Inspection Report
    South Wales Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 HMIC Inspection Report South Wales Police Major Crime July 2008 1 South Wales Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 ISBN: 978-1-84726-735-1 CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST PUBLISHED 2008 2 South Wales Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 Contents Introduction to HMIC Inspections HMIC Business Plan for 2008/09 Programmed Frameworks Major Crime Future Programmed Inspections The Grading Process Developing Practice Force Overview and Context Findings Major Crime Recommendations Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 3 South Wales Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 Introduction to HMIC Inspections For a century and a half, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) has been charged with examining and improving the efficiency of the police service in England and Wales, with the first HM Inspectors (HMIs) being appointed under the provisions of the County and Borough Police Act 1856. In 1962, the Royal Commission on the Police formally acknowledged HMIC’s contribution to policing. HMIs are appointed by the Crown on the recommendation of the Home Secretary and report to HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary, who is the Home Secretary’s principal professional policing adviser and is independent of both the Home Office and the police service. HMIC’s principal statutory duties are set out in the Police Act 1996. For more information, please visit HMIC’s website at http://inspectorates.homeoffice.gov.uk/hmic/. In 2006, HMIC conducted a broad assessment of all 43 Home Office police forces in England and Wales, examining 23 areas of activity. This baseline assessment had followed a similar process in 2005, and thus created a rich evidence base of strengths and weaknesses across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Police – HMIC Inspection Report
    Surrey Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 HMIC Inspection Report Surrey Police Major Crime July 2008 Surrey Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 ISBN: 978-1-84726-740-5 CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST PUBLISHED 2008 Surrey Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 Contents Introduction to HMIC Inspections HMIC Business Plan for 2008/09 Programmed Frameworks Major Crime Future Programmed Inspections The Grading Process Developing Practice Force Overview and Context Major Crime Recommendations Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Appendix 2: Developing Practice Surrey Police – HMIC Inspection Report July 2008 Introduction to HMIC Inspections For a century and a half, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) has been charged with examining and improving the efficiency of the police service in England and Wales, with the first HM Inspectors (HMIs) being appointed under the provisions of the County and Borough Police Act 1856. In 1962, the Royal Commission on the Police formally acknowledged HMIC’s contribution to policing. HMIs are appointed by the Crown on the recommendation of the Home Secretary and report to HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary, who is the Home Secretary’s principal professional policing adviser and is independent of both the Home Office and the police service. HMIC’s principal statutory duties are set out in the Police Act 1996. For more information, please visit HMIC’s website at http://inspectorates.homeoffice.gov.uk/hmic/. In 2006, HMIC conducted a broad assessment of all 43 Home Office police forces in England and Wales, examining 23 areas of activity. This baseline assessment had followed a similar process in 2005, and thus created a rich evidence base of strengths and weaknesses across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • By Nacro Nacro Briefing on Military Convictions and Criminal Records
    Military convictions and criminal records January 2013 1 Introduction Nacro is the largest crime reduction charity in England and Wales. We help over 70,000 people each year, reducing crime and the impact of crime in over 200 communities up and down the country. Nacro’s mission to reduce crime and change lives is predicated on the belief that we must reduce the devastating effects crime has on individual victims and on communities, using evidence-based practice to do what works to reduce crime and reoffending. Victims of crime have to live with the experience forever, whilst those who commit crime can find it hard to break the destructive cycle of offending. At Nacro our work focuses on: intervening early with people at risk of becoming involved in crime and antisocial behaviour to prevent crime happening in the first place working with people in prison or on a community sentence so they change their behaviour, take steps to repair the damage they have caused individual victims and communities, and move on from crime and offending resettling offenders after custody helping them to find a home, a job, develop new skills, rebuild relationships and reintegrate into their community. Our Resettlement Advice Service offers the UK’s only dedicated confidential helpline and online service providing free expert advice, support and advocacy to serving prisoners and ex-offenders who have put their offending behaviour behind them but face severe barriers to moving their lives on as a result of the stigma attached to their former behaviour. We work very closely with the Disclosure and Barring Service who put employers and members of the public in touch with us for advice on matters relating to standard and enhanced criminal record checks and risk assessments.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (1987) Code of Practice for Police Computer Systems, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (1995) Code of Practice for Data Protection, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2000) General Rules for Criminal Record Weeding on Police Systems Version 5, November, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2002) Code of Practice for Data Protection, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2004)Driving Down Crime: Denying Criminals the Use of the Road, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2010) Criminal Use of Firearms: Briefing Paper – Anonymity in Investigations, Investigation Anonymity Orders, Coroners and Justice Act 2009, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2013)The Police Use of Automatic Number Plate Recognition, January, London. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2014) National Policing Position Statement: The Use of the Polygraph in Investigations, May, London (available at: http://library.college.police.uk/docs/APPREF/National-Policing-Position- Statement-use-of-Polygraph-May-2014.pdf accessed 23 March 2017). ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers)/Centrex (2006) Guidance on the Management of Police Information. © The Author(s) 2017 269 D. Marshall, T. Thomas, Privacy and Criminal Justice, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64912-2 270 Bibliography Addley E and Topping A (2017) Council Admits Racially Discriminating Against Two Boys over Prevent Toy Gun Referral. The Guardian, 27 January. Al Jnidi D (2009) Life with a Control Order: A Wife’s Story, The Independent, 2 July. Alford S (2012) The Watchers: A Secret History of the Reign of Elizabeth ,I London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.
    [Show full text]