The Baum-Taft House: a Historiography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Baum-Taft House: a Historiography Spring 1988 The Baum-Taft House The Baum-Taft House: A Historiography Jaync Merkel The Taft Museum seems to be a perfectly exist, and early documentary evidence is fragmentary. The restored residence from the beginning of the nineteenth first statements made about the house in print, from the century, but it is, in fact, a building that has been enlarged, 183 o's, mention the building itself only in passing. Not until altered, restored, and redefined over a period of 150 years to the beginning of the twentieth century did historians men- serve a series of residential and institutional purposes. Simi- tion its architecture. Soon after that interest centered on the larly the history of the Baum-Taft house—or any version of architect who designed it, even though today it appears it—seems to describe something fixed and certain, but the likely that the original house was the work of a carpenter- study of its history reveals a series of assertions, assumptions, builder and that a number of architects, decorators, crafts- stories, and myths uncovered or invented to explain the men, and other professionals were involved in its design, building that the authors saw or thought they saw. The remodeling, additions, and renovation over the years. historiography of the Baum-Taft residence reveals as much The entry on the Baum-Taft house in G.E. about the writing of architectural history and commentary Kidder Smith's The Architecture of the United States, one of the in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as the fabric of the most reputable guides to American architecture, typifies the house does about the building practices during that time.1 commentary made during most of this century: No original drawings or plans of the house The Taft Museum was built as the residence of Martin Baum, Jayne Merkel is an art historian Front (west) elevation of the who works as architecture Baum-Taft house (Taft critic of the Cincinnati Enquirer Museum), Cincinnati, Ohio. and WGUC. She also writes Photo by Jeff Friedman, Cin- regularly for Art in America, cinnati, Ohio. The Baum-Taft Inland Architect, and Artforum. house is one of the finest exam- ples of Federal architecture in the state of Ohio. 34 Queen City Heritage with James Hoban of Washington fame thought by some to be its inhabitants and consists almost entirely of literary evidence: architect or at least a consultant. The house also recalls Jeffersonianletters, deeds, articles, papers, and word of mouth. Hardly principles of proportion. (Some attribute the house to Latrobe butanyone actually looked at the building or studied old maps, this is not borne out by Hamlin.)... Its architectural ambitions drawings, and photographs. Most of the researchers were attain elegance, with two-story central block and lower wings atnot art or architectural historians by training, but even those either side, and an unusual play of oval lights in the central section. who were did not conduct a thorough visual analysis—research A positively scaled, well-projected Tuscan portico marks the entry,with a crow bar, literally digging into the walls and under the giving a Greek Revival touch to the Federal Style building. The floors — that Richard Cote, Curator of the White House of entire house is of white-painted wood.2 the Confederacy, and other scholars have been doing recent- Like most of the people who studied and ly on historic houses in Virginia. wrote about the house, Kidder Smith did not base his attri- Also, most of the people who worked on the bution on visual evidence or connect it with his own descrip- Baum-Taft house in the past did not list their sources. Some tion. When the facade of the Taft Museum is compared to did not even include footnotes or bibliographies so their Hoban's most famous work, the White House in Washing- statements, dates, and attributions cannot be substantiated. ton, it is obvious that the two buildings could not have been When the same date appears again and again, it is impossible designed by the same architect. They are both white houses to determine whether it was repeated because the author with flanking wings and classical colonnades but the resem- found it in a book or article or if he came to the same blance stops there. The roof lines, the window frames, the conclusion on his own. Although much of the existing materials, the scale, the degree of detail—the whole approach research has limited usefulness for further inquiry, it shows to the classical vocabulary—is radically different. But those what the house has meant to previous generations, enriches differences were not noted in the literature on the house the lore of local history, and demonstrates the complexity which showed little interest in the building fabric of the involved in gathering information about even a well-preserved, house, what it looked like, how it was made, how it worked, existing structure. and how it evolved over time. The first document that pertains, even periph- The research on the house that has been done erally, to the Baum-Taft house is the earliest map of the city over the years concentrates mainly on the builders as well as in the collection of The Cincinnati Historical Society: Israel Illustration of the front (west) ing and the 1857 lithograph on elevation of the Baum-Taft page two of this publication. house (TaftMuseum) published in Harper's Weekly, July, 1858. Please note the architectural differences between this draw- Spring 1988 The Baum-Taft House 3 5 Ludlow's Plan of the Town of Cincinnati in 1802, which is Society for the Promotion of Agriculture, Manufacturing, hand-drawn in ink. Since it does not take in the area where and the Domestic Economy he served as a trustee of the the house is located, it provides only a kind of negative Select Council of the corporation of the city but declined an evidence. It suggests that the area east of the public landing offer to represent the district in the United States Congress.7 and Fort Washington had not yet been platted and developed. Visual evidence exists to support Baum's acqui- On September 1, 1812, Martin Baum pur- sition of the land where the Taft Museum is located. It chased the site of the Taft Museum from Daniel Symmes, suggests that if not by 1812, then by 181 5, the city had and the transfer of the land is on file in the Hamilton County grown to encompass the site. A Plan of Cincinnati, Including Courthouse.3 Baum had come to Cincinnati during the All the Later Additions and Subdivisions Engraved for Daniel mid-1790's. Marilyn Ott, a former Taft Museum docent, Drake's Statistical View of 1 815, in the collection of The found his name in the church records of the First Presbyteri- Cincinnati Historical Society, extends about five blocks east an Church of Cincinnati as early as June 11, 1794, and in the of Broadway along the river. The land in the newly incorpo- birth and baptismal registry of the Salem Reformed Church rated eastern area is subdivided, and a big green space appears (now the United Church of Christ) in Hagerstown, Mary- on the side of the eventual site of the Baum-Taft house, land, where Baum was born on June 15, 1765.4 Other located between Symmes and Congress (later Fourth and sources, such as H.A. Ratterman's Der Deutsche Pionier ofThird) streets east of Pike Street. And, in the memoirs of 1 878s and a 1954 Literary Club paper, "Benjamin Latrobe, John Hough James, who lived in Cincinnati from 181 3 to Was he the Architect (?) of the Taft Museum," by librarian 1826, there is a reference to a garden planted for Baum on Carl Vitz6 maintain that Baum was born in Hagenau, Alsace, the west side of Deer Creek by a gardener named Schnetz Germany. The City Directory of 182 5 lists his place of birth assome time around i8i6or 1817.8 Pennsylvania. On another map of Cincinnati which is next When Baum arrived, Cincinnati was a village in a chronological sequence, the Plan of Cincinnati, Including of 500 with ninety-four cabins and ten frame houses. He All the late Additions & Subdivisions Engraved for Oliver Earnsworth built a two-story frame structure across the street from in 1 819, the green space is not shown. There are no lot lines Yeatman's Tavern (the center of the city's social, political, around the Baum property. But there is a house in the and economic life at the time) on the northwest corner of vicinity, one of the five large and imposing ones in the city Front and Sycamore streets, opened a general store, and that were illustrated on the map. It is probably the William soon became one of the city's wealthiest citizens. In 1804 he Lytle house which stood in what is now Lytle Park. married Ann Sommerville Wallace and eventually became Documents from the next year indicate that a the brother-in-law of several prominent early citizens such as house was under construction on the Baum property. There Judge Jacob Burnet, Nehemiah Wade, Samuel Perry, and was a financial "panic" in 1820 when the Cincinnati Branch Matthew Wallace, the pastor of the First Presbyterian Church. of the U.S. Bank sent some notes to Washington that had After his marriage, he built a brick residence next to the store been issued against land and other collateral, and the central at Front and Sycamore streets. He expanded his business U.S. Bank sent them back.
Recommended publications
  • WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT HOME Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT HOME Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: William Howard Taft Home (Updated Documentation and Name Change) Other Name/Site Number: Alphonso Taft Home William Howard Taft National Historic Site 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 2038 Auburn Avenue Not for publication: City/Town: Cincinnati Vicinity: State: OH County: Hamilton Code: 061 Zip Code: 45219-3025 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): _X_ Public-Local: District: ___ Public-State: ___ Site: ___ Public-Federal: _X_ Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 1 buildings 1 0 sites 0 0 structures 0 objects 2 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related MultipleDRAFT Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT HOME Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Colony Hill Historic District Nomination
    2 Name and telephone of author of application EHT Traceries, Inc. (202) 393-1199 Date received ___________ H.P.O. staff ___________ NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Colony Hill Historic District Other names/site number: N/A Name of related multiple property listing: N/A ___________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: 1700-1731 Hoban Road, N.W., 1800-1821 Hoban Road, N.W., 4501-4520 Hoban Road, N.W., 1801-1820 Forty-Fifth Street, N.W., 4407-4444 Hadfield Road, N.W., 1701-1717 Foxhall Road, NW. City or town: Washington State: District of Columbia County: ____________ Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing the White House: 1792 – 1830
    Classroom Resource Packet Designing the White House: 1792 – 1830 INTRODUCTION As the president’s office and home, the White House stands as a symbol of American leadership. President George Washington selected the site and approved the final design, but he never had an opportunity to live in the building once known as the “President’s Palace.” When the initial construction was finished in 1800, John Adams became the first president to occupy this famous home. Explore the design and creation of the building from its inception, to the burning by the British in 1814, and the completion of the porticoes by 1830 that resulted in the White House’s iconic appearance. CONTEXTUAL ESSAY In 1790, Congress passed the Residence Act, which established a permanent national capital to be built on the Potomac River. President George Washington had the authority to pick the specific site of the capital city, and he selected engineer and architect Pierre Charles L’Enfant to begin planning the city streets inside a 10-mile square section of farmland (Image 1). Washington chose the spot for the President’s House, and L’Enfant set aside this space for what he called a “palace” for the president (Image 2). L’Enfant’s original plan for the President’s House was five times the size of the house which would be built, so “palace” seemed appropriate at the time. But for a new republic whose leaders would be ordinary citizens—not kings— the building was scaled back, and so was its name. It became known Image 2 as simply “The President’s House.” After George Washington dismissed L'Enfant for insubordination in early 1792, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson organized a design contest and announced a prize of five hundred dollars or a medal of that value for the best design of the President’s House.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography Of
    A Catalog of the Book and Archival Materials Held by the William Howard Taft National Historic Site, Cincinnati, Ohio Cataloged by the Staff of the Cataloging Services Department Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Edited by Roger M. Miller Cataloging Services Department Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County September 2008 The Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County 800 Vine Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202‐2071 513‐369‐6900 www.cincinnatilibrary.org Located in Cincinnati’s historic Mount Auburn neighborhood, the William Howard Taft National Historic Site is comprised of the Taft family home and the Taft Education Center. William Howard Taft, who was 27th President and 10th Chief Justice of The United States, lived in this home from the time of his birth in 1857 until he was 25 years of age. The William Howard Taft National Historic Site was established in 1969 and is administered by the National Parks Service. In addition to having many pieces of furniture and interior decoration that belonged to the Taft family, the Site has over 400 book volumes located on shelves in the Taft home or in storage in the Taft Education Center. While these volumes were previously cataloged within an internal database, they were not available to searchers over the Internet. In 2007, the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County agreed to catalog the Taft collection and thereby make it accessible to searchers through its own catalog, available over the Internet at http://catalog.cincinnatilibrary.org. Of the 305 titles cataloged in the fall of 2007, approximately 65 were duplicates of titles already held by the Public Library, and approximately 239 were new to the Public Library’s catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Catholic Architects Built a Legacy in Georgia and Elsewhere
    Thursday, May 22, 2008 FEATURE Southern Cross, Page 3 Irish Catholic architects built a legacy in Georgia and elsewhere n e-mail from Joan B. Altmeyer, an employee of the Catholic Diocese of Savannah, started it all. architectural efforts, to name a few, included the AHaving heard about him from a friend, Altmeyer became interested in Jeremiah O’Rourke, a pro- Georgia Female College at Macon and a chapel at lific designer of Catholic churches in the Northeast, and the architect of the notable federal court- the University of Georgia in Athens. In 1839, house on Savannah’s Wright Square. “It (O’Rourke’s involvement with the Savannah building) has Charles Cluskey returned to Savannah where pol- nothing to do with our diocese (except that his influence stretched to this geographic area),” itics and shipping claimed his attention along Altmeyer wrote, “but it is still interesting.” with designing Greek-Revival style mansions for wealthy Savannah clients. In 1842, another Jeremiah O’Rourke eral architect”—fine-tuned the “White House”, Cluskey daughter, Johanna Elizabeth, was bap- Altmeyer’s information about O’Rourke turned as it was later called, well into his old age. In tized at the Cathedral. out to be not only “interesting,” but also tangen- addition to his architectural obligations, Hoban Pushing his career forward, Cluskey moved to tially related to the Savannah Diocese. Architect expanded his activities over time, becoming a “greener pastures” in Washington in 1847, hoping Jeremiah O’Rourke, born in Dublin and graduated militia leader, a census taker and a member of his proposed designs for renovation of the from the Government School of Design in 1850, the Washington City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • In America's Short but Tenuous History, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Had Always Been the Capital
    The White House Reading Comprehension Name_____________________ In America's short but tenuous history, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, had always been the capital. In 1790, however, as a result of a secret deal between Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, the new nation's capital would be moved from the northeast to a more southern location. George Washington would decide the exact location of the capital. He chose a small, swampy area on the Potomac River between Maryland and Virginia near his home at Mount Vernon. This region would soon become known as the District of Columbia. While in the District of Columbia, Washington and Pierre L'Enfant, a city planner, helped find a location that would house the president of the United States. After a suitable location was found, a competition was held to build the house. Irish architect James Hoban won the contract to design and build the house. He designed the house after a model in the Book of Architecture called the Gibbs House. The house was completed in 1800. John Adams, not George Washington, became the first president to live in it. It was located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Despite the many changes that the house has been through in the past 200 years, its location has remained the same. In 1814, as part of the War of 1812, the British occupied Washington and burned the house to the ground. Two years later James Hoban successfully restored it to its original form and added a south portico. The house was known as the Executive Mansion or President's Palace for much of the 1800's.
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston County News Release
    Charleston County News Release Release Number: 2987 Date: March 9, 2009 Kilkenny County, Ireland Representatives Visit Charleston to Promote Exhibit at Historic County Courthouse March 16 event to honor Irish-born architect James Hoban, whose work in Charleston led to his selection as designer for the White House The public is invited to attend a unique event on Monday, March 16, honoring and opening an exhibit for Irish-born architect James Hoban, designer of the White House, The event, “Kilkenny to Carolina: The Emigrant Experience of a Single Area of Ireland and its Charleston Connections”, will include a series of lectures held on March 16 at the Mills House Hotel (115 Meeting Street, Charleston) followed by the opening of the James Hoban exhibit at 5 p.m. at the Charleston County Historic Courthouse (84 Broad Street, Charleston). Distinguished guests from Charleston County and Kilkenny County, Ireland will be in Charleston to participate in the opening of the exhibit. The guests from Ireland are Tomas Breathnach, Chairman of Kilkenny County Council, and Joseph Crockett, Kilkenny City and County Manager. In 1787, Kilkenny-born James Hoban arrived in Charleston, having spent two years in Philadelphia, where he made the acquaintance of many of the prominent South Carolinians who were attending sessions of the Constitutional Convention. Although still in an unfinished state, the Charleston County Courthouse was visited by President George Washington as he searched for architectural examples he could use as a pattern for the White House. While in Charleston, Washington met James Hoban, who worked as a local builder. Hoban would become the architect of the original White House, built in 1792.
    [Show full text]
  • Significance of the Revival of Greece As a Factor in War Brain Surgery Reaches a High Mark As Result of War Work %Y CHAKLES M
    Rambler Writes of James Who Lived on F Street The wrnif Thorn¬ Man, Architect, by a« for time past ha* lately tikm up BN the sketch of Dr. William auch delicacy that he will not hold intercourse ton last Sunday the Rambler men¬ with or Submit . the Superiority of Mr. Hohnn, the Principal. On explanation we have parted, tioned James Hoban as having he was on n liberal appointment hut refuses t» among the early residents of give up the Plans and Kssays of Plans as you'll been aee by the inclosed. From llallette's disposition, . P street. The home of Dr. Thornton as disclosed in this transaction we expect )>. stood on the site now occupied by No. will run out all proeeas before he'll jive out tha 1331 F, and Mr. Hoban owned two of papers. of Philip Barton Key. to whom the eorh- the original lots on the north side missioners applird for aid against Hal- F between 14th and 15th streets. It lette, was an uncle of Francis Scott is necessary to say "original lots" be¬ Key. Kverybody in the District is are much smaller familiar with the name. "Wooflley cause the present lots lane." and it takes its name from than the lots laid off in the first sur¬ Philip Barton Key's home, which h<» vey of the city. The following is taken called Woodley. It was a tract of 2T»0 written in 1794: acres which Mr. Key s<>cured ih 1704 from a narrative out of the larger tract called "Rose- now into 1.236 lot* owned The city is apportioned lot dale," by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Unions Attacked the Single Transferable Vote in Cincinnati∗
    Bad for Party Discipline: Why Unions Attacked the Single Transferable Vote in Cincinnati∗ Jack Santucci [email protected] This version: June 28, 2017 Original: July 22, 2015 The years around World War I brought major political changes to advanced industrial democracies. New demands led to rapid extensions of voting rights, mass defections to labor- based parties, and the adoption of proportional representation (PR) voting schemes.1 The last of these is the most important cause of a multi-party system.2 Roughly speaking, if a party gets ten percent of votes, it gets ten percent of legislative seats. Political scientists have long observed that social democracy thrives under PR.3 Oftentimes, as in Australia, Germany, and Switzerland, local PR experiments predated a national adoption.4 The United States was not immune to the global changes in party systems. Women won the vote in 1920, officially doubling electorates in states that had not yet granted voting rights.5 Third-party presidential runs in 1912 and 1924 shook the Republican Party in the Mountain States and American Midwest. This intra-party fighting continued in cities where reformers rewrote voting rules to eject the old-style parties from power.6 From 1915-48, in fact, the chosen reform in 24 cities was proportional representation. ∗Jasmine Underwood provided research assistance. Bill Collins, Jack Lucas, Colin Moore, Hans Noel, Rob Richie, and Kent Weaver gave helpful feedback on earlier drafts. Bill Gradison gave important insight into local history. 1 Compared to PR systems in
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Judiciary Square Historic District
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation _X_ Amendment of a previous designation __ Please summarize any amendment(s) Property name Judiciary Square Historic District If any part of the interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. Address Roughly bounded by Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues, N.W. and C Street, N.W. to the south, 6th Street to the west, G Street to the north, and 3rd and 4th Streets N.W to the east. See Boundary Description section for details. Square and lot number(s) Various Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2C Date of construction 1791-1968 Date of major alteration(s) Various Architect(s) Pierre Charles L’Enfant, George Hadield, Montgomery C. Meigs, Elliott Woods, Nathan C. Wyeth, Gilbert S. Underwood, Louis Justement Architectural style(s) Various Original use Various Property owner Various Legal address of property owner Various NAME OF APPLICANT(S) DC Preservation League If the applicant is an organization, it must submit evidence that among its purposes is the promotion of historic preservation in the District of Columbia. A copy of its charter, articles of incorporation, or by-laws, setting forth such purpose, will satisfy this requirement. Address/Telephone of applicant(s) 1221 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036 Name and title of authorized representative Rebecca Miller, Executive Director Signature of representative _______ _____ Date ____10/25/2018______ Name and telephone of author of application DC Preservation League, 202.783.5144 Office of Planning, 801 North Capitol Street, NE, Suite 3000, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Taft Family Gathering. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Taft Family, At
    929.2 T1256t 1710190 REYNOLDS HISTORICAL GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 01393 8052 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center http://www.archive.org/details/taftfamilygatherOOuxbr '1 M:di £m\nb fetlmiiisj. .f?Wm | PROCEEDINGS AT THE MEETING OF THE II AT IJXBRIDGE, MASS., August 12, 1874 UXBRIDGE: SPENCER BROTHERS, BOOK AND JOB PRINT Compendium Oi kk e. ;M TAFT FAMILY GATHERING . PROCEEDINGS AT THE MEETING OF THE Hi « « c AT UXBRIDGK, MASS. August 12, 1874 ; I UXBRIDGE: 1* KIN TED BY S PENCE It BttOTHJSttS. COMPENDIUM OFFICE. 1874. El 1710190 Xyr K; THE HON. ALPHONSO TAFT, SECRETARY OF WAR. [Photoqrapuei> by J. Landy, 209 Focrtu Stueet, Cinoinsatl] : : PRELIMINARY REMARKS. Nearly all the "Tafts" in the United States are the descendants of Robert Taft, who settled in the town of Mendon, Mass., in the year 1680. It being desirable that a correct genealogical record of the descendants of this man be obtained, a meeting of gentlemen bearing the name of Taft was held in New York on the 30th day of December last, as requested by the following circular : To the Members of the Taft Family in the United States WHEREAS, There have been collected, to a large extent, the statistics of our family comprising the descendants of our ancestor, Robert Taft,who, in Mendon, with five sons, emigrated about the year 1660, and settled record completed Mass., and it is deemed by us desirable to have the by a and put in book form, and thinking it can be done more thoroughly concert of action.
    [Show full text]