DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridge Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bridge Inventory OFFICE OF BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT BRIDGE INVENTORY BRIDGE NO. 0207000 THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY BRIDGE MARYLAND 450 OVER THE SEVERN RIVER ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY 1996 BIENNIAL AWARD - EXCELLENCE IN HIGHWAY DESIGN - USDOT - FHWA MARYLAND SECTION - AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS - OUTSTANDING CIVIL ENGINEERING ACHIEVEMENT 1995 NATIONAL STEEL BRIDGE ALLIANCE AWARD /AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION - MEDIUM SPAN CATEGORY 1996 AMERICAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS COUNCIL AWARD PRESIDENTIAL DESIGN AWARD - FEDERAL DESIGN ACHIEVEMENT AWARD NATIONAL QUALITY INITIATIVE ACHIEVEMENT AWARD - 1997 NATIONAL FINALIST Maryland Department of Transportation CONSULTING ENGINEERS COUNCIL OF MARYLAND - AWARD OF MERIT STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION REV. 7/99 NOTES AND DEHNITIONS mtmm DEnNmON FO« A BHDGE: ANY STRUCTUU (BIUDGC , lOX CULVERT, BATTERY OF PIPES) THAT HAS A LENGTH CREATES THAN 20 FEET MEASURfD ALONG THE CENTERUNE OF HIGHWAY. ACCMT Aipttah Coatmi Corrugcriml M^ol Pip* AC AJuminwm Gird«f DEFINTnON OF SINGLE SINGLE STRUCTURE: ANY BRIDGE WHICH CARRIES A SINGLE ROADWAY OR DUAL ROADWAY ON WHICH •A Bride Arrh AND DUAL STRUCTURES: THE MEDIAN AREA IS CLOSED, SHALL BE CONSIDERED A SINGLE BRIDGE. A LONCTTUDINAL JOINT (2" OR LESS) IN THE MEDIAN BARRIER, OR MEDIAN AREA K vOX Cunwrt DOCS NOT CONSTITUTE A LARGE ENOUGH OPENING TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURE AS DUAL BRIDGES. •G iox Gtrd«- DUAL STRUCTURES: ANY STRUCTURE NOT MEETING THE CRTTERIA FOR A SINGLE BRIDGE IS TO BE (C) Qo9*d Strvctur^ CONSIDERED A DUAL STRUCTURE AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED TWO BRIDGES. CA Coocrvto ATQI ca CoocFsto B#oin CHART DEFINITION: A CONTRACT HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE AND PLACED IN THE INVENTORY SYSTEM WHEN C3G CM KJ ••• Box Gird*r INFORMATION FOR THE DESIGN LOAD, YEAR BUILT, TYPE AND SPAN, AND ROADWAY HAVE BEEN LEFT BLANK. CG CcMMJ'vfa On o*i' WHENEVER APPEARS IN A COLUMN, IT INDICATES THAT THERE IS NO INFORMATION CorrvQatad Metal rip# AVAILABLE FOR THAT COLUMN. Concr»N Slab DoubU LMf Bcncul* WHENEVER THE WORD 'STANDARD' APPEARS IN A DESIGN LOAD COLUMN, IT INDICATES THAT THE STRUCTURE IS OLD AND WAS BUILT USING THE STANDARD DESIGN FOR THAT YEAR. DT Dock Tnns Encosod Stool Boom WHEREVER THE LETTERS "%', 'C, OR "HLL' APPEAR. S DENOTES SIMPLE TYPE SPAN, C DENOTES Muhipkrto MotalArch CONTINUOUS TYPE SPAN, AND HLL DENOTES DEPTH OF COVER ON BOX CULVERT OR PIPES. m Posiod Strvctur* SK DENOTES THAT THE BRIDGE IS ON A SKEWED ANGLE. M Kpo Arch rioAlionod Concrota nc WHEREVER YES APPEARS IN THE NHS COLUMN, IT DENOTES A BRIDGE ON THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM. rsr Pony Stool Tniss UCCP Roinforcoa Comont Concroto Ptpo •F RIQIO Frafno SA Stan* Arch NOTE: S«**iBax Gird*r NUMBERS I THRU 23 ARE ASSIGNED TO THE 23 COUNTIES OF THE STATE. NUMBER 24 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO BALTIMORE CITY. NUMBER 24 IS NOT SHOWN IN THIS INVENTORY BOOK. NUMBERS 25 THRU 30 HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED TO DIFFERENT ROUTES OF THE MD. TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. SG St**IGird*r su Singi* Laaf Boicul* SPfA Strndural Plot* Pip* Arch STA SlMlAnh SW Swing T Timb*f TSC Thru St**IGinl*r TST Thru St**i Trim VM TimD*f Whorf VS VokM Slab STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION-OFFICE OF BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REV. STATE OF MARYLAND 7/99 STATE ROUTES WITH BRIDGE WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS SM6UUMI 0—— SNCUUMT COMMMWN C10S3NG WDii NO. nun NO. OKSSWG ma NO. (OUTENO. VBKlf VHOE vnoi VMOI *1UC«HT CO. HMKMS CO. 0117400 MO. 633 WESTERN MO. SCENIC RAILROAD 30.0OO 3O.O0O 01016 00 M0. 935 GEORGES CREEK 8.000 8,000 0102100 OLD MO. 36 A8AN0ONE0 MINE RAILROAD CLOSED 0106400 SCENIC U.S. 40 SIDELING HILL CREEK 30.0O0 30.000 0107900 OP 347 JENNWCS RUN 20.000 20.000 i-C-02 US 40 ALT CSX TRANS 48.000 8O.O00 HOWMD CO. am co. ANNE MUNMl CO. 0205200 MD. 179 MILL CREEK 60.000 • 50.000 MOMrsoMtr co. 1S006X0 MO. 97 BR. OF HAWLINCS RIVER 60.0O0* SO.OOO 1501900 MO. IIS CSX TRANS 30. OOO 80.000 1503500 MO. 196 PAINT BRANCH CLOSED 1507000 MO. 109 BR. LITTLE MONOCACY 58.000 • 80.000 1509900 MO. 103 LITTLE BENNETT CREEK 58.000 • 66. OOO •ALTMOa CO. 0306900 MO. 128 MCGILL RUN SO.OOO • 62.0O0 03O7100 MO. 128 WESTERN MO. RAILWAY S5.0OO 5S.000 naNCE ccoicfs co. 0317400 PUTTY «.!. TO. 1-695 52.0OO SO. 000 1601700 MO. 450 PENN CENTRAL R.R. 30.000 30.000 SO.OOO 032280O P1T4PSC0 STATE PARK 1-70 60.000 SO. 000 1604800 MO. 978 COLLINCTON BRANCH 56. OOO • 03344X0 MO. a SLACK ROCK RUN 52.0O0 SO. 000 16109OO MO. 717 WESTERN BRANCH 58.000 * 68.000 0336500 PENMSULA EXPRESSHAT BEAR CREEK 46.000 SO.OOO OaVBTT CO. QUON ANNFS CO. 0401100 MO. 261 FISHING CREEK 50.000 • 6O.O00 1703400 MO. 405 GERMAN BRANCH 58. OOO • 80.000 04019X0 MO. 262 CHEW CREEK 58.0OO » 80.000 STMATTS CO. 1802000 MO. 242 ST. CLEMENTS CREEK 52.000 • SO.OOO CMOUNI CO. 0501300 ADJACENT TO MO 331 HUNTING CREEK CLOSED 0503OO0 MO. 315 MARSHYMOPE CREEK 20.0OO 20.000 SOMBBET CO. OUKXi CO. 0601600 MO. 84 MEADOW BRANCH 58.000 • 70.000 0601800 MO. 86 BR. OF GUNPOWDER FALLS 56.000 • so.ooo TAUOT CO. 62.000 • 80.000 0601900 MD. 86 GUNPOWDER FALLS 56.000 • so.ooo 20020X0 MO. 303 BR. OF TUCKAHOE CREEK 0602500 MO. 832 BIG PIPE CREEK 62.000 • SO.OOO WASMNCTON CO. 2102300 MO. 56 LITTLE CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK 24. OOO 24.000 2103800 MD. 68 ANTIETAM CREEK 27. OOO 27.000 27. OOO CKll CO. 2103900 MO. 68 BEAVER CREEK 27. OOO 0705700 MO. 591 OCTARARO CREEK CLOSED CHAHfS CO. WKOMKO CO. 60. OOO • 30.000 0801500 MD. 6 NANJEMOY CREEK 62.000 » so. ooo 2200400 U.S. BUS. 13 EAST BRANCH OF W1C0MIC0 RIVER 62. OOO • 80.000 0801900 MO. 224 BR. OF THOMAS CUT 58.000 » so.ooo 2201900 MD. 354 AOKINS POND 52.000 • SO.OOO 0802000 MO. 224 THOMAS CUT 58.000 • SO.OOO 2202000 MD. 354 AOKINS POND 22029X0 MD. 54 MOCKINGBIRD CREEK 58. OOO » SO.OOO DOKHBnt CO. SO.OOO • 60.000 0900800 MO. 795 CAMBRIDGE CREEK 58.000 » SO. 000 2300400 MO. 675 POCOMOKE RIVER 2301300 MO. 367 BUNTINGS BRANCH 60. OOO • 80.000 immcK co. 1003804 MD. 144 WB MONOCACY RIVER CLOSED 1004800 MO. 76 WESTERN MD. R.R. 20.000 20.000 10053X0 MO. 75 BEAVER DAM CREEK 56.0OO • 80.000 1005700 MD. 351 BALLENGER CREEK 54.000 • 80.000 1016200 0U1NN RO. LONG BRANCH 48.000 • 80.000 1017600 MO. 17 CATOCTIN CREEK 52.000 • 68.000 GMnOTTCO. 1100800 LITTLE SAVAGE RD. SAVAGE RIVER 30.000 30. OOO • MHOTB rrrt 3 vmoi • » THIS a NOTOASSmO ASA MKMi (IBS THAN M FBT M UN8TH) STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION-OFFICE OF BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REV. 7/99 • STATE OF MARYLAND TABULATION OF BRIDGES ON STATE ROUTES WITH VERTICAL CLEARANCES LESS THAN 14 FEET 6 INCHES MMOMM VBTKU (OUTI NO. tXXM* mod no. OiAMNQ Muaurr co. 0I0470Q Ud 5. Town CreeK 14--0- 0:04000 US 220 Md !35 i Potomac River at Keyser l^-O" Ud 36 CSX TRANS, over at Frostburg 10'-4- MO 831A WMSRR over at Narrows M'-J" Md 51 CSX TRANS, over ot Paw Paw 13--4- 0200100 1-695 Pataosco River i Hcmmonas Ferry Road I3--6- 0202001/0202002 MC 295 Hanover Roca under 14--01 ULvmom. co. 0306401/0306402 1-83 nmonlum Road under I4--4- 0313100 1-695 R4MP 'H- 1-695 RAMP 'J' 14'-41 0313500 SECURITY BLVD. 1-695 RAMP •?• I4--4- 0314000 1-695 Miiford Mill Road unaer 14--0- 0314900 1-695 Greensorinq Avenue under I4--I- Ud 700 SB AMTRAK over i3--ir Ud 140 western Mc. Rwy. over 13'-I0- oat co. Ud 7 AMTRAK over 13--0- Ud 7 CSX TRANS, over 13'-0- Ud 7 AMTRAK over I2--0- Ud 269 Conrait (abandoned) over il'-O' FKOetKX CO. 1008500 Ud 355 Monocacy River •H'-O* Ud 75 CSX TRANS, over ir-s- HOWMD CO. 303400 US 40 Forest Rood under \y-o- 1303500 US l Race TracK Road under I3--6- MONTCOMBrr CO. 1504300 1-270 Great Seneca Cr i Come Preserve Rood \y-o- 150T800 US 29 CSX TRANS, over \A--0- 1509000 Md 191 CSX TRANS, over • I4--3- 1510400 1-495 UacArthur Blvd & GWMP under M'-O1 1510900 1-495 RdmD K over Cabin Jonn Parkway NB ir-y '514300 1-495 NW Ramo over MacArthur 81 vG M'-O4 Md 117 CSX TRANS, over at Boyds 12'-0- Md 117 CSX TRANS, over at BucKlodge 13--0- Ud 109 CSX TRANS, over ot Bornesvllle 13--0' rtma cfoxcts co. 1510801/1610802 Md 4 Rdce Track Rood under I4--0- Tuat co. 2000100 Md 33 Knaoos Narrows • 10--8- Ud 303 MDDE Railroad over ir-e- WASHINGTON CO. 2109403 1-70 EB Licking Creek 1 Md 907 under I3--6- mcowco co. 2202600 US 50 US 13 over l4'-4' 2202700 US 50 Pennsylvania Railroad over 14--V 2302200 Md 90 Ocean Parkway 10--o- • Clearance at Kneebrace - Full width of rooaway restricted Note I: For exoct location of structure see pertinent county map. Note 2: Harper Tunnel Clearonce-14' Maximum Allowable Heigtit of Venicle and Load 13'. Note 3: The vertical clearance limitations shown on this sheet are not guoronteed. Due to resurfocing of highways etc. these are subject to change and may be greater of certain positions under a structure. If dimensions ore to be used to determine routes for exact movement, field measurements will be necessary. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION-OFFSCE OF BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REV. 7/99 PlF^WimPdi ®/hT/h BRIDGE ROUTE TYPE OF PHONE CLEARANCE OPENINGS NAME OVER DRAWSPAN NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No-Discharge Zones for Vessel Sewage in Maryland and Virginia
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/11/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-09957, and on govinfo.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL 10021-74-Region 3] Clean Water Act: No-Discharge Zones for Vessel Sewage in Maryland and Virginia AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice–final determination. SUMMARY: On behalf of the State of Maryland, the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources requested that the Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3 approve a no-discharge zone for thirteen water bodies in Anne Arundel County, Maryland pursuant to the Clean Water Act. After review of Maryland’s application, EPA determined that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonable available for all thirteen waterbodies within Anne Arundel County. The application is available upon request from EPA (at the email address below). DATES: This approval is effective upon the date of publication in the Federal Register on [INSTERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ferry Akbar Buchanan, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region III. Telephone: (215) 814-2570; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Clean Water Act section 312(f)(3), if any state determines that the protection and enhancement of the quality of some or all of the state’s waters require greater environmental protection, the state may designate the waters as a vessel sewage no-discharge zone. However, the state may not establish the no-discharge zone until EPA has determined that adequate pumpout facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably available for the proposed waters.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Dickerson Biking Trail
    THE DICKERSON BIKING TRAIL 摰摦 周畲獤慹Ⱐ乯癥浢敲′〬′〰㠠㌺ㄸ㨴㠠偍 THE DICKERSON BIKING TRAIL Bicycling through the Farmer’s World of 1895 This cycle tour recaptures some of the daily practices and customs of a farming community at the end of the 19th century. It visits farmsteads and the sites of social and commercial establishments that were part of the farm family’s life in and around Dickerson in 185. While the urban centers of this period were enjoying such technological innovations as electric lights and indoor plumbing, the farmer’s personal lifestyle had changed little since the mid-century. Not until electric power reached farther into the rural areas, arriving in Dickerson in 1928, did indoor plumbing facilities for farm homes become prevalent; the cast iron water pump and the now-legendary outhouse were still common rural fixtures. The farmer’s house, illuminated by gas or oil lamps, glowed much the same as homes half a century earlier. The major changes in the community had been in farming practices and transportation. While the farmer’s personal habits and manners had changed little from those of his immediate ancestors, reapers, threshers and self-propelled steam engines, along with better systems of fertilization and crop rotation, had allowed him to realize harvests unimaginable to his father. And the new railroad, the Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, which came through in 1873, gave him a quick, efficient way to get them to market. Running 41 miles from Washington to its junction with the old Main Line at Point of Rocks, the railroad had provided construction jobs for local day laborers and handymen and then maintenance work along the right- of-way, and white-collar jobs on the trains and in the many stationhouses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chesapeake Bay Trust
    The Chesapeake Bay Trust Working to promote public awareness and participation in the restoration and protection of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries Annual Report 2003 From the Chairman Dear Friends of the Chesapeake Bay, With the help of many partners, volunteers, and donors, 2003 has been a terrific year for the Chesapeake Bay Trust. In 2003, the Trust was pleased to award more than $1.8 million in grants to nonprofit organizations, community groups, schools, and public agencies—an increase of nearly 50 percent from the previous year. This marks the highest level of annual grantmaking in the Trust’s 18-year history. Through this ambitious year of grantmaking, the Trust has supported hundreds of projects that benefit the Bay and involve the citizens of Maryland in the process. Trust grants helped plant stream- side forests to reduce water pollution and create important wildlife habitat. They supported innovative streambank stabilization projects—called “living shorelines”—that absorb polluted run-off and reestablish fish and crab habitat. And Trust grants gave thousands of Maryland students a greater appreciation for the Bay through hands-on experiences like skipjack trips and schoolyard habitat projects. The following pages detail these and other projects supported by the Trust at locations throughout the state. This report also summarizes other notable Trust activities in 2003, including a new scholarship, an urban watershed grant program, and a new design for the popular Treasure the Chesapeake license plate. In 2003, the Trust made significant strides in advancing its mission to promote public awareness and participation in the restoration and protection of the Chesapeake Bay and its rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Jones Falls Sewershed
    GREEN TOWSON ALLIANCE WHITE PAPER ON SEWERS AUGUST 31, 2017 IS RAW SEWAGE CONTAMINATING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD STREAMS? ANALYISIS OF THE JONES FALLS SEWERSHED ADEQUATE PUBLIC SEWER TASK FORCE OF THE GREEN TOWSON ALLIANCE: Larry Fogelson, Retired MD State Planner, Rogers Forge Resident Tom McCord, Former CFO, and MD Industry CPA, Ruxton Resident Roger Gookin, Retired Sewer Contractor, Towsongate Resident JONES FALLS SEWER SYSTEM INVESTIGATION AND REPORT It is shocking that in the year 2017, human waste is discharged into open waters. The Green Towson Alliance (GTA) believes the public has a right to know that continuing problems with the Baltimore County sanitary sewer system are probably contributing to dangerous bacteria in Lake Roland and the streams and waterways that flow into it. This paper is the result of 15 months of inquiries and analysis of information provided by the County and direct observations by individuals with expertise in various professional disciplines related to this topic. GTA welcomes additional information that might alter our analysis and disprove our findings. To date, the generalized types of responses GTA has received to questions generated by our analysis do not constitute proof, or provide assurance, that all is well. 1. The Adequate Public Sewer Task Force of the Green Towson Alliance: The purpose of this task force is to protect water quality and public health by promoting the integrity and adequacy of the sanitary sewer systems that serve the Towson area. It seeks transparency by regulators and responsible officials to assure that the sewerage systems are properly planned, maintained, and operated in a manner that meets the requirements of governing laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • May 8–11, 2017
    EDUCATION INSPIRATION CELEBRATION May 8–11, 2017 GRAND RAPIDS, educationRALL•inspiration •celebrYation MICHIGAN AGENDA WELCOME TO RIVER RALLY 2017! MONDAY, MAY 8TH 6:00pm–8:00pm River Rally 2017 Welcome & Opening Reception Ambassador Ballroom Welcome to River Rally 2017 in fabulous Grand Rapids, Michigan! Your job is to get as much from this event as possible—new knowledge, new friends, new ideas, and new TH TUESDAY, MAY 9 energy to bring back to your work to safeguard the health of our nation’s rivers and the 7:30am–9:00am Breakfast & Keynote Speaker Ambassador Ballroom promise of affordable clean water for all. 9:30am–11:00am Workshops River Rally 2017 arrives at a time when the social and political context of water is 11:30am–12:45pm Lunch & Plenary Panel Ambassador Ballroom changing. We have seen clearly that not only are the benefits of water not shared 1:00pm–2:30pm Workshops equitably, but the harm caused by floods, droughts, water contamination, and climate 3:00pm–4:30pm Workshops change are disproportionately experienced by low income communities, people of color, NICOLE SILK 6:30pm–8:00pm Dinner On-Your-Own and indigenous and tribal communities. 8:00pm–10:30pm Talent Show & Open Mic Pantlind Ballroom Rather than turning a blind eye to this reality, we are intentionally bringing full focus to this changing context through our program this year. We believe that a different path forward is possible by working together across WEDNESDAY, MAY 10TH political, economic, social, and other divisions, though only if we fully understand where we stand today.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Investigations 71 (Pdf, 4.8
    Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Emery T. Cleaves, Director REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 71 A STRATEGY FOR A STREAM-GAGING NETWORK IN MARYLAND by Emery T. Cleaves, State Geologist and Director, Maryland Geological Survey and Edward J. Doheny, Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey Prepared for the Maryland Water Monitoring Council in cooperation with the Stream-Gage Committee 2000 Parris N. Glendening Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend Lieutenant Governor Sarah Taylor-Rogers Secretary Stanley K. Arthur Deputy Secretary MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 General DNR Public Information Number: 1-877-620-8DNR http://www.dnr.state.md.us MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2300 St. Paul Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 (410) 554-5500 http://mgs.dnr.md.gov The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or physical or mental disability. COMMISSION OF THE MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. GORDON WOLMAN, CHAIRMAN F. PIERCE LINAWEAVER ROBERT W. RIDKY JAMES B. STRIBLING CONTENTS Page Executive summary.........................................................................................................................................................1 Why stream gages?.........................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Msa S1879 000004.Pdf
    I * t I t / ^ t J r i t I t i * t 8 i I8 s B roin 9 ro b 0 D z zi B m • o o X 8 X 9 m m o n o x 71 m 3 m o m o o c z I. Iz B s a D o 8 D ft M ft s CO a CO 3. o ^• • n O o c ft 3 4 < I c j z "11 ri 51 u > o l:! s n k !:i v Tl B -i en I o 03 S. 8 X in in m a U |'J f o < (i:) z 1 1 i> i o <: < T n n 71 it rr in g 8 o 8 M Q 5 Q q 3 O n CD (D -%O (Q <D «)' • o O o C 3 i ro i tlLlMiiMl lil.t > r w o O O c 10 H SL a o o o c 3 ofo 1996 OFFICE OF BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT BRIDGE INVE NTO BRIDGE NO. 21038 MD ROUTE 68 OVER ANTIETAM CREEK WASHINGTON COUNTY AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE - MO CHAPTER EXCELLENCE IN CONCRETE AWARD 1995 - 1996 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS - MD CHAPTER OUTSTANDING CIVIL ENGINEERING ACHIEVEMENT 1995 - 1996 Mary/and Department of Transportation STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION NOTES AND DEBNmOMS LEGEND DEHNFTION FOR A BRIDGE ANY STSUCTURE (BRIDGE , BOX CULVERT, BATTERT Of PIPES) THAT HAS A LENGTH GREATER THAN 20 FEET MEASURED ALONG THE CENTERUNE OF HIGHWAY. ACCMP AsphoHCeatod Comigatad MvtatPip* AG Aiuminum Gira«r DEFINrtlON OF SINGLE SINGLE STRUCTURE: ANY BRIDE WHICH CARRIES A SINGLE ROADWAY OR DUAL ROADWAY ON WHICH AND DUAL STRUCTURES: THE MEDIAN AREA IS CLOSED, SHALL BE CONSIDERED A SINGLE BRIDGE.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716
    City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: City Transportation Priority List for 2021-2022 DATE: July 29, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ I. Background Each year, the City Council conducts an overview of the State’s Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP) and County Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the purposes of establishing the City’s Transportation Priority Listing. The City’s priorities are communicated to State and County officials as early input to the next year’s budget cycle. A typical project in the CTP will go through four distinct stages, as noted below. Not all activities for each project may be funded at the same time. Some projects are funded for the first activity, but then left dormant for various reasons. The levels of activity, or stages, a typical project goes through are: • Project Planning, which is a two-step process. The first part of Project Planning is the delineation of a project’s limits and identification of those agencies whose participation will be necessary in the project. The second step is to determine necessary improvements which may be required for construction of a project, such as identifying various activities like right- of-way acquisition or wetlands mitigation which must be carried out, and determining such design aspects of a project as the required number of lanes or whether noise barriers will be required; • Design and Engineering, which is where the actual details of such factors as how much fill may be needed, where the various utilities will be located (i.e., underground versus overhead), etc., are determined; • Right-of-Way Acquisition, which is where SHA actually negotiates with land owners to obtain whatever land is needed to construct the project; and • Construction, which is the final activity where the road or improvement is actually constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Water Resources 2009 CITY OF WESTMINSTER Water Resources 2009 What is the Water Resources Element? Community Vision for During its 2008 General Session, the Maryland General Water Assembly, as part of section 1.03 (iii) of Article 66B of the Annotated Code of Maryland, mandated that all Maryland The City’s ability to provide water to counties and municipalities exercising planning and residents and businesses has become an zoning authority prepare and adopt a Water Resources issue of great importance in recent years. Element in their Comprehensive Plans. According to the 2008 Community Survey, 65% of residents are satisfied with Requirements: the quality of water in Westminster, while Identify drinking water and other water resources others were concerned with the quality of that will be adequate for the needs of existing and their water service. future development Residents would like to improved water Identify suitable receiving waters and land areas to service in terms of improved meet the storm water management and wastewater communication. For example, residents treatment and disposal needs of existing and future development would like the City give proper notification when performing sewer or Purpose: water system repairs, as those repairs affect water pressure or the color of water. To ensure the Comprehensive Plan integrates water resources issues and potential solutions Residents also suggested that the City create incentives for residents to conserve To outline how management of water, wastewater and stormwater will support planned growth, given water in order to ensure reliable water water resource limitations service can continue into the future. Water Resources Priorities: State Planning Visions found in this Element: Water supply availability Infrastructure: Growth areas have the water resources and infrastructure to accommodate Reclaimed water use population and business expansion in an orderly, efficient, and environmentally sound manner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway
    THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the Patapsco Regional Greenway Concept Plan and Implementation Matrix is largely a community effort, the following individuals should be recognized for their input and contribution. Mary Catherine Cochran, Patapsco Heritage Greenway Dan Hudson, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Rob Dyke, Maryland Park Service Joe Vogelpohl, Maryland Park Service Eric Crawford, Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park and Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ed Dixon, MORE Chris Eatough, Howard County Office of Transportation Tim Schneid, Baltimore Gas & Electric Pat McDougall, Baltimore County Recreation & Parks Molly Gallant, Baltimore City Recreation & Parks Nokomis Ford, Carroll County Department of Planning The Patapsco Regional Greenway 2 THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................4 2 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ...............14 3 EXISTING PLANS ...............................................18 4 TREATMENTS TOOLKIT .......................................22 5 GREENWAY MAPS .............................................26 6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .................................88 7 FUNDING SOURCES ...........................................148 8 CONCLUSION ....................................................152 APPENDICES ........................................................154 Appendix A: Community Feedback .......................................155 Appendix B: Survey
    [Show full text]