DOCSLIB.ORG

ROAD SAFETY PLAN 05/06 to 07/08 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ROAD SAFETY PLAN 05/06 to 07/08 Contents Draft ROAD SAFETY PLAN 05/06 to 07/08 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................2 2. CASUALTY TARGETS ........................................................................................................4 3. PERFOMANCE AGAINST CASUALTY TARGETS TO DATE ............................................6 4. POLICIES .............................................................................................................................9 5. EDUCATION, ENGINEERING AND ENFORCEMENT ......................................................12 6. MONITORING ....................................................................................................................32 7. PARTNERSHIP ..................................................................................................................33 1. INTRODUCTION Statutory Framework 1.1 The Road Traffic Act 1988, Section 39, gave local authorities responsibility for all roads outside the motorway and trunk road system. This was superseded by the Greater London Authority Act 1999, which transferred responsibility for the Greater London Authority roads to Transport for London but left local authorities responsible for road safety on remaining roads within the local authority. 1.2 Local authorities are required by statute to: • Carry out a programme of measures designed to promote road safety on existing roads and in the construction of new roads. • Undertake studies of accidents. • Take measures to prevent such accidents. • Provide road safety education, training and publicity for all ages and types of road user, from pre-school children to the elderly. 1.3 The Council has a statutory duty to maintain the safe, convenient and free flow of pedestrian and vehicle traffic except where lawful restriction of speed direction or movement of traffic is imposed by a legal order. The Council has powers as a highway authority under the Highways Act 1980 to construct, manage, maintain and improve highways. It also has powers under the Road Traffic Act 1991 to enforce parking restrictions in order to promote safety. 1.4 The Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 places a duty on local authorities to secure the expeditious, convenient and safe movement of vehicular and other traffic, including pedestrians and cyclists, and the provision of suitable and adequate parking facilities on and off the highway and to have particular regard to: • Reasonable access to premises • The effect on amenities and • Passage of public service vehicles and the safety of passengers. Policy Background 1.5 In “Tomorrow’s Roads: Safer for Everyone”, published in March 2000, the Government has set new national targets for road casualty reduction (see Section 2 below for details). The Mayor of London’s Transport Strategy and Road Safety Plan require all London boroughs to prepare a local road safety plan. The plan should set out how boroughs intend to meet the Government’s national road safety targets, as well as the Mayor’s road safety targets and priorities for London. Overview of Casualty Reduction in Harrow 1.6 Harrow has a strong tradition of promoting and prioritising road safety. This is reflected in accident records, which consistently show that the number of casualties in Harrow each year is amongst the lowest of all London Boroughs. Harrow has the lowest accident rate per head of population of all the London boroughs. 1.7 Road accident casualties are a major cause of suffering and it is important that where possible, additional effort is made to eliminate the principal causes of this suffering. 2 1.8 This Road Safety Plan is a response to out ways in which the Council intends to contribute towards the reduction of road accident casualties. The Plan sets out t 1.9 The Councilenforcement can only programmes, achieve a limited which amount seek toon en its own and anyone involved in safely as possible and in accordanc transport has a responsibility for safety. T manufacturers and all road user 1.10 The Council’sbenefit efforts of the incommunity. recent years In haveaddition, technol the general enforcement of accident reduction target for both killed and serious 1.11 The mainplan factor puts in forward most accidents Harrow’s is plans the in in ensuring t to be reduced and shows the Council’s resolve in achieving road safety targets. the aforementioned poli he education, training, engineering and casualties make up for 66% of e to the statutor borough has one on the highest number of househo sure that roads are laid out and managed as the highest of households that own 2 or more ca traffic regulations.s have a role in creating a rates in London. 1400 he Government, the Council, the Police, car 1200 y requirements. cy documents and sets 1000 A djacent Boroughs ogy plays an increasingly important part in 800 Table XX: Casualties per 100,000 population for already resulted in achieving the 2010 national 600 all casualties. However, 400 Outer London Boroughs safer environment for the 200 hat casualty reduction in Harrow continues ly injured and for slight injuries. This volvement of the car. In Harrow, car occupant 0 Harro w Brent Barnet rs, yet ldsstill who has ownone aof car/van, the lowest and casualty is among Data 2001 census populationHillingdon it should be Ealing Bexley Kingston upon Thames noted that the Sutton each Borou Bromley Merton Richmond upon Thames g Croydon h, 2003 Barking and Dagenham Waltham Forest Havering Redbridge Enfield Greenwich Hounslow Wandsworth Newham Kensington and Chelsea Tower Hamlets Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Hackney Lewisham Islington Lambeth Southwark Westminster 3 2. CASUALTY TARGETS NATIONAL 2.1 The Government published the national road safety strategy and casualty targets for 2010 in the document “Tomorrow’s Roads – Safe for Everyone”. The new targets set the challenge to achieve by 2010: • 40% reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured (KSI) in road accidents • 50% reduction in the number of children killed or seriously injured • 10% reduction in the slight casualty rate, expressed as the number of people slightly injured per 100 million vehicle kilometres • 40% reduction in pedestrian, cyclist and powered two wheeler rider killed and seriously injured Comparisons are to the average for 1994-98. 2.2 This indicates the following targets for Harrow: 1994-1998 (baseline) 2010 Target 40% reduction in KSIs 122 73 50% reduction in children KSIs 20 10 10% reduction in slight casualties 728 655 LONDON 2.3 In London there are particular problems with high numbers of pedestrian casualties and pedal cyclists and the increase in the use of powered two wheelers since the introduction of congestion charging. The Mayor of London’s Transport Strategy is intended to promote and increase walking and cycling. The increase in walking, cycling and powered two wheelers use make it even more challenging to achieve the targets. In recognition of the particular circumstances in London, the Mayor’s Transport Strategy indicates that the 40% reduction target is to be applied to each of the categories of pedestrians, cyclists and riders of powered two wheelers and a 50% reduction for children from the 1994-1998 baseline. There is also a 10% reduction target for all casualties (including slights). 2.4 This indicates the following targets for Harrow: Target of 40% KSI reduction 1994-1998 (baseline) 2010 Target Pedestrians 34 21 Cyclists 7 4 Power two wheelers 12 7 HARROW 2.5 For many years, Harrow has achieved lower accidents than nearly all other London Boroughs. For this reason achieving even further reductions is considerably more challenging. As a result of achievements in accident savings in 2003, Harrow now has the 3rd lowest number of casualties of all the outer London boroughs and 4th lowest number of casualties in the whole of London. 4 2.6 Harrow Council is determined to give road safety the high priority required and have therefore set local targets in excess of both the national and the London targets. In the Harrow Local Public Service Agreement, a target in excess of the national casualty reduction target has been agreed for reducing deaths and serious injuries on the roads in Harrow. The stretched performance target is to reduce the number of people killed or seriously injured to 90 per year (annual average for 3 years ending 31 December 2005). For 1999-2001 the average was 110 per year. An Urban Safety Zones Initiative is underway to enhance the normal safety and accident remedial work. This identifies four areas with poor accident records, 3 town centres (Stanmore, Hatch End and Rayners Lane) plus one principal road route (Marsh Lane, Honeypot Lane) and will investigate and implement safety improvements. Table 1: Summary of road safety targets for Harrow Source Target National 40% reduction in KSI 2010 73 50% reduction in children 2010 10 KSIs 10% reduction in slight 2010 655 casualties London Target of 40% KSI reduction Pedestrians 2010 21 Cyclists 2010 4 Power two wheelers 2010 7 Harrow LPSA Total KSIs per year 2005 90 5 3. PERFOMANCE AGAINST CA Figures X1to X? show Harrow’s KSIs and casualti Tables Y1 to Y? summarises Harrow’s progress in achieving the targets. Figure X1 - Killed and seriously injured casualties against 2010 target 200 180 160 KSIs 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1990 30 25 Figure XX - Children killed1 and991 seriously injured against 2010 target 20 KSIs 15 1992 10 SUALTY TARGETS TO DATE 5 1993 0 19 1994 90 1991 1995 1992 1996 es rate performance against
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Cycling Campaign 15 March 2016 Paddington to Wood Lane Via
    London Cycling Campaign 15 March 2016 Paddington to Wood Lane via Westway overall The London Cycling Campaign is the capital’s leading cycling organisation with more than 12,000 members and 40,000 supporters. We welcome the opportunity to comment on these plans and our response was developed with input from the co-chairs of our Infrastructure Review Group and our local groups the Westminster Cycling Campaign, Kensington & Chelsea Cycling Campaign, Ealing Cycling Campaign, HF Cyclists, and in support of their consultation responses. On balance, we support this scheme. We have serious reservations about the choice to use the Westway. A route that took in surface streets would likely be superior – with more opportunities for cyclists to enter and exit the Cycle Superhighway where they chose (possibly the planned CS9?). But we recognise that due to the intransigence of some London councils, such a scheme is currently unlikely to move forward, unfortunately. The London Cycling Campaign would also like to see all schemes given a CLoS rating (as well as adhering to the latest London Cycle Design Standards) that demonstrates significant improvement from the current layout will be achieved for cycling, and that eliminates all “critical fails” in any proposed design before being funded for construction, let alone public consultation. Section 1 - Westbourne Terrace We have serious concerns about hook risks at the junctions here. Particularly designs such as the Cleveland Terrace junction look set to put cyclists and left-turning traffic in direct conflict. This is not acceptable – and a redesign of these junctions to favour safety over motor vehicle capacity has to be a priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Traffic Signals Copyright
    Economic impact of traffic signals copyright Greater London Authority November 2009 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4000 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN: 978-1-84781-310-7 Cover photograph © istock Paper Printed on 9Lives 80 silk – 80 per cent recycled fibre, 20 per cent from sustainable forest management, totally chlorine free fibre. For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics telephone 020 7983 4922 email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. The unit is funded by the Greater London Authority, Transport for London and the London Development Agency. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. GLA Economics, the GLA, LDA and TfL will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. Greater London Authority Economic Impact of Traffic Signals Report colinbuchanan.com Economic Impact of Traffic Signals Report Project No: 16365 10 Eastbourne Terrace, London, W2 6LG Telephone: 020 7053 1300 Fax: 020 7053 1301 Email : [email protected] Prepared by: Approved by: ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Ashish Chandra John Siraut Status: Final (C) Copyright Colin Buchanan and Partners Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • 149 – 157 Harrow Road & Adjacent Highway / Open Space Paddington
    & adjacenthighway/openspace 149 –157HarrowRoad adopted planningbrief Paddington London, W2 Version; Adopted version Date: 28 October 2004 Status: Includes responses to consultation representations Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................ 3 1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 5 Target audience for this document ..................................................................... 6 2 Context of the site .............................................................................................. 7 Site attributes ..................................................................................................... 10 Site constraints................................................................................................... 10 3 Reasons for producing this Brief ........................................................................ 11 4 Planning Policy and Guidance Context .............................................................. 11 Mayor’s Spatial Development Strategy............................................................... 11 City of Westminster’s Unitary Development Plan ............................................... 12 Civic Renewal..................................................................................................... 13 The City Plan.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wembley Commercial Centre
    AVAILABLE TO LET Wembley Commercial Centre Ground Floor, Unit C, Building B, Wembley Commercial Centre, East Lane, Wembley HA9 7XX A Collection of Ground & Lower Ground Floor Warehousing in Wembley Commercial Centre Wembley Commercial Centre A Collection of Ground & Lower Rent £12.00 psf Ground Floor Warehousing in S/C Details Included in the rent Wembley Commercial Centre Rates detail Tenants to make their Open plan warehouse spaces with natural light on the own enquiries with the ground floor and good ceiling heights throughout, London Borough of located within a secure gated Commercial Centre. Brent. Access is provided via a roller shutter loading door and a ramp down to the lower ground floor. Building type Industrial The property is versatile and could be suitable for a Planning class B8 number of various usages. Secondary classes B1 Sizes 1,491 to 2,386 Sq ft VAT charges Plus VAT. Lease details A new lease for a term by arrangement. EPC certificate Available on request Marketed by: Dutch & Dutch For more information please visit: http://example.org/m/39973-wembley-commercial- centre-ground-floor-unit-c-building-b Wembley Commercial Centre Close Proximity to A40/A406 Secure gated estate with 24-hour access and security Established industrial location Shutter access 3-phase power & gas supply Estate parking available W/C's Competitive rent of £12 psf including Service Charge Wembley Commercial Centre Wembley Commercial Centre Wembley Commercial Centre, Ground Floor, Unit C, Building B, Wembley Commercial Centre, East Lane, Wembley
    [Show full text]
  • A1/A2/A3 Opportunity to Let
    A1/A2/A3 OPPORTUNITY TO LET Former Neeld Arms 362 Harrow Road Maida Vale W9 DESCRIPTION G M r aida Vale o v e Following completion REGENT’Sof the residential MAIDA E n PARK VALE d extension above, the premises will Ro a LOCATION d comprise Ground and Lower Ground ve A gin dFloors. NB Subject to verificationP on site l oa a E R rk Road d oo The property is situated in a W s Ground Floor Sales c 1,400 Sq Ft Lower Ground Storage c 1, 600 Sq Ft e ’s r hn C t Jo very prominent corner position e n S o t Av g L n i 1 isso r 5 on the busy Harrow Road at the r erland a M n h Gr i W Sut n 5 s o junction with Maryland Road. 362 ve Gr M i n eat Western E H s W arr WARWICK dgew LONDON With Maida Vale and Warwick ow R arwi oad AVENUE MARYLEBONE ck a Av re Avenue tube stations nearby, e R o a d average house prices in Maida Ro a EDGEWARE oad d R one Vale W9 for 3 bed properties ROAD ryleb W Ma now exceed £1Million. The estw a y Porchester Road A40 Westway BBC Maida Vale Studios, ROYAL OAK Westbourne Park Villas t home of the BBC Symphony ee PADDINGTON tr ge Road S id ed ’s Br a ns Orchestra are also nearby. Pr e rd Bishop ex Ga Suss Indicative floor plan. Not to scale.
    [Show full text]
  • North West London Development / Refurbishment Opportunity for Sale Suitable for Alternative Uses (STPP)
    North West London Development / Refurbishment Opportunity For Sale Suitable for Alternative Uses (STPP) FORMER KODAK OFFICE BUILDING, HEADSTONE DRIVE, HARROW, HA1 4TY NORTH WEST LONDON DEVELOPMENT/REFURBISHMENT OPPORTUNITY Former Kodak Office Building, Headstone Drive, Harrow, HA1 4TY Summary – North West London Development/ Refurbishment Opportunity For Sale – Long Leasehold interest from 18th June 2018 (998 years unexpired) at a peppercorn ground rent with option to purchase the Freehold interest – Available with full vacant possession – Site extends to 1.20 acre (0.468 hectare) – Three storey, 36,951 sq ft (NIA) office building with 45 car parking spaces – Planning permission granted to add two floors, and to provided Grade A offices – Suitable for alternative uses (STPP) – Price upon application FORMER KODAK OFFICE BUILDING HARROW DEVELOPMENT / REFURBISHMENT OPPORTUNITY 2 Location D OA T R KE M1 OC L MOTORWAY Harrow is a major commercial retail centre in the affluent north west London Borough of Harrow. Rail communications into Central London are provided via KODAK Harrow-on-the-Hill railway station, which BUILDING A provides a regular service to London 4 DRIV E 0 E 9 STON Marylebone every 30 minutes. London HEAD Underground services to Baker Street via Harrow & the Metropolitan Line are also available Wealdstone with a journey time of 18 minutes. Heathrow 3mins 10mins H Airport is 11 miles to the south west. M4 A R ILL H R H MOTORWAY G O U W O R The town centre has excellent shopping, W O B A L amenity and recreational facilities. There Y R M A are two shopping centres, St George’s and St Ann’s, with retailers including Primark, 8 mins to Harrow H&M and a Vue Cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety: Written Submissions Page 1) Tfl Submission on Pedestrian Safety Page
    London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety: Written Submissions Page 1) TfL submission on Pedestrian Safety Page 15) Appendix A RSSG Membership Page 17) Appendix B - List of sites where pedestrian green man time has been reduced Page 39) Appendix C - List of Sites without audible or tactile 12-12-13 v2 Page 59) Appendix D - List of pedestrian crossings which have been removed since 2010 v2 Page 65) Appendix E - 2012 Business Plan Road Safety Funding.pdf Page 66) Appendix F - Key Walking Routes Page 67) TfL letter March 2014 Page 73) Metropolitan Police March 2014 Page 77) City of Westminster letter February 2014 Page 85) RoadPeace submission February 2014 Page 91) Living Streets submission Page 93) KOVE submission January 2014 Page 96) KOVE Road Crossings report findings June 2008 Page 110) Southwark Living Streets December 2013 Page 114) Wandsworth Living Streets December 2013 Page 117) Hammersmith and Fulham Disability Forum Page 118) Road Peace: Causing death by driving in London in 2012 Page 121) Road Peace: Criminal convictions and pedestrian and cyclist deaths in London July 2013 London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety 9 January 2014 1. Introduction TfL welcomes the opportunity to provide the London Assembly Transport Committee with an overview of the steps being taken to improve pedestrian safety in London. The Committee has requested information ahead of the meeting on 9 January, which is included in this report and the accompanying appendices where appropriate. Summary of Key Points: • The safety of London’s roads has been improving steadily since 2000; • In June 2013, Safe Streets for London: The Road Safety Action Plan for London 2020 was published.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow Transport Local Implementation Plan 2019/20
    Harrow Transport Local Implementation Plan 2019/20 - 2021/22 Page 2 CONTENT Foreword .......................................................................................................................... 7 Executive summary ........................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction and preparing a LIP ............................................................................. 9 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................9 1.2 Local approval process .............................................................................................................9 1.3 Statutory consultation ........................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Statutory duties ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.5 LIP approval ........................................................................................................................... 13 2. Borough Transport Objectives ................................................................................ 13 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 TfL City planner tool .............................................................................................................. 14
    [Show full text]
  • 3252606 Harrow Road WESTMINSTER
    Appeal Decision Site visit made on 20 October 2020 by M Cryan BA(Hons) DipTP MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 24 February 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/X5990/W/20/3252606 525 Harrow Road, London W10 4RH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mendoza Limited against the decision of City of Westminster Council. • The application Ref 19/06213/FUL, dated 30 July 2019, was refused by notice dated 15 November 2019. • The development proposed is continued use as public house (Use Class A4) at basement and ground floors and conversion of upper floors into six residential units together with roof extension to existing building. Erection of four storey mixed-use building over beer garden restating Class A4 use at ground floor level and provision of three residential units on upper floors. Demolition of pub garden outbuildings and boundary wall to Harrow Road. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of (i) the proposed alterations to the Flora Hotel, and (ii) the proposed new building on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to whether or not they would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Queen’s Park Estate Conservation Area. Reasons 3. The appeal site consists of the Flora Hotel and its associated garden and outbuildings, which are set on a narrow and tapering site between Harrow Road and the Paddington Arm of the Grand Union Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Oldfield Lane North Greenford Ub6 0Az
    OLDFIELD LANE NORTH GREENFORD UB6 0AZ 7,000 SQ FT (650 SQ M) TO LET A GREAT BUSINESS LOCATION - WELL SERVED WITH RETAIL AND DINING AMENITIES. WESTWAY CROSS RETAIL PARK IS A SHORT WALK AWAY. Retailers on the Park include: M&S Foodhall Pets at Home TK Maxx JD Sports Boots TUI New Look Carphone Warehouse Next Poundland Hobby Craft McDonald’s Sports Direct Costa WH Smith Subway A GREAT PLACE TO WORK - Description Specification Located on the first floor, the office - Efficient fitted office accommodation HIGH QUALITY ACCOMMODATION WITH accommodation is configured as a mix of - Staffed reception area EXCELLENT NATURAL LIGHT AND open plan and private offices with meeting - 2x10 person passenger lifts rooms, kitchen and break out areas. The - 10 car parking spaces AN ON-SITE CAFÉ. floor benefits from excellent natural light. - Demised kitchens - Raised floors throughout - Excellent natural light - Perimeter fan coil air conditioning Accommodation Approx net internal areas. Floor sq ft sq m First 7,000 650 Total 7,000 650 Typical floor plan A COMMUNICATIONS HUB - TRAVEL DISTANCES BY ROAD ADJACENT TO GREENFORD STATION WITH FAST LINKS M40 3 miles TO CENTRAL LONDON AND SURROUNDING AREAS M4 6 miles BY RAIL & ROAD. M25 8.5 miles Heathrow Airport 9.5 miles Central London 11 miles Source: Google Maps. SUDBURY HILL NTON ROAD HARROW B KE HARROW UR WATFORD / Y ST WE W HARROW RO THE NORTH (M1) A A D T F O R SUDBURY HILL D D ST A M40 R 16 1 O E A ND SUDBURY & D AR RO ST E HARROW ROAD UL W E W A40 RC W VENU HIT O WE I HITTON A T B XF STERN C ON SUDBURY R
    [Show full text]
  • CAL 139 London Roads Carrying Over 10000 Vpd Ranked by Volume of Traffic and Searchable
    CLEAN AIR IN LONDON Roads carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day Received from Transport for London on 060411 DfT Annual Road Traffic Census Counts Major road links within Greater London with an Annual average daily flow estimate of Greater than 10,000 vehicles 2009 Annual Average Daily Traffic Flows Estimates by link Number of All Motor Vehicles -------------Annual Average Daily Flow Estimates--------------- Easting Northing of count of count Road Road Name From…. ….to site site All Motor Vehicles 1 M25 N/A 14 LA Boundary 504031 176656 213,127 2 M4 N/A LA Boundary 4 506000 178400 170,726 3 A13 Newham Way A117 A13 543000 182214 148,977 4 A13 Newham Way A112 A117 542000 182120 140,175 5 A40 Western Avenue A312 A4127 514000 183445 136,071 6 A406 North Circular Road LA Boundary A124 543450 185670 135,043 7 A406 N/A A118 LA Boundary 543400 186000 135,043 8 M25 N/A LA Boundary 25 536250 200000 134,423 9 A4 Great West Road LA Boundary A4 522005 178312 133,364 Southend Road (North 10 A406 Southend Road LA Boundary Cicular Road) 540000 190450 130,196 Southend Road (North 11 A406 Circular Road) A104 LA Boundary 539445 190430 130,196 12 M4 N/A LA Boundary A312 510401 178265 125,029 13 M4 N/A 4 3 508900 178400 125,029 14 A1261 Aspen Way A1206 Aspen Way Tunnel 538620 180750 123,339 15 M25 N/A LA Boundary 29 558360 185100 122,011 16 M25 N/A 28 LA Boundary 555000 194030 117,523 17 A40 Western Avenue A4127 A406(T) 515000 183145 117,405 18 A13 Newham Way A1011 A112 540000 181700 114,549 19 M25 N/A 29 LA Boundary 557400 190260 114,392 20 M25 N/A LA Boundary
    [Show full text]
  • East-West Cycle Superhighway Paddington to Wood Lane
    East-West Cycle Superhighway Paddington to Wood Lane Consultation report August 2017 Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................... 3 1. About the proposals ................................................................................................... 5 2. About the consultation ................................................................................................. 9 3. About the respondents .............................................................................................. 15 4. Summary of all consultation responses ..................................................................... 21 5. Conclusion and next steps ........................................................................................ 34 Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments ................................................................... 36 Appendix B: TfL response to issues commonly raised (overall proposals) ..................... 58 Appendix C: Consultation letters .................................................................................... 69 Appendix D: Email to Oyster users on the TfL database ................................................ 74 Appendix E: Summary of stakeholder responses ........................................................... 75 2 Executive summary Between 8 February and 20 March 2016, we consulted on proposals to extend the East-West Cycle Superhighway from Paddington to Wood Lane. The aim is to provide a clearer
    [Show full text]