Understanding Intervals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Naming a Chord Once You Know the Common Names of the Intervals, the Naming of Chords Is a Little Less Daunting
Naming a Chord Once you know the common names of the intervals, the naming of chords is a little less daunting. Still, there are a few conventions and short-hand terms that many musicians use, that may be confusing at times. A few terms are used throughout the maze of chord names, and it is good to know what they refer to: Major / Minor – a “minor” note is one half step below the “major.” When naming intervals, all but the “perfect” intervals (1,4, 5, 8) are either major or minor. Generally if neither word is used, major is assumed, unless the situation is obvious. However, when used in naming extended chords, the word “minor” usually is reserved to indicate that the third of the triad is flatted. The word “major” is reserved to designate the major seventh interval as opposed to the minor or dominant seventh. It is assumed that the third is major, unless the word “minor” is said, right after the letter name of the chord. Similarly, in a seventh chord, the seventh interval is assumed to be a minor seventh (aka “dominant seventh), unless the word “major” comes right before the word “seventh.” Thus a common “C7” would mean a C major triad with a dominant seventh (CEGBb) While a “Cmaj7” (or CM7) would mean a C major triad with the major seventh interval added (CEGB), And a “Cmin7” (or Cm7) would mean a C minor triad with a dominant seventh interval added (CEbGBb) The dissonant “Cm(M7)” – “C minor major seventh” is fairly uncommon outside of modern jazz: it would mean a C minor triad with the major seventh interval added (CEbGB) Suspended – To suspend a note would mean to raise it up a half step. -
MUSIC THEORY UNIT 5: TRIADS Intervallic Structure of Triads
MUSIC THEORY UNIT 5: TRIADS Intervallic structure of Triads Another name of an interval is a “dyad” (two pitches). If two successive intervals (3 notes) happen simultaneously, we now have what is referred to as a chord or a “triad” (three pitches) Major and Minor Triads A Major triad consists of a M3 and a P5 interval from the root. A minor triad consists of a m3 and a P5 interval from the root. Diminished and Augmented Triads A diminished triad consists of a m3 and a dim 5th interval from the root. An augmented triad consists of a M3 and an Aug 5th interval from the root. The augmented triad has a major third interval and an augmented fifth interval from the root. An augmented triad differs from a major triad because the “5th” interval is a half-step higher than it is in the major triad. The diminished triad differs from minor triad because the “5th” interval is a half-step lower than it is in the minor triad. Recommended process: 1. Memorize your Perfect 5th intervals from most root pitches (ex. A-E, B-F#, C-G, D-A, etc…) 2. Know that a Major 3rd interval is two whole steps from a root pitch If you can identify a M3 and P5 from a root, you will be able to correctly spell your Major Triads. 3. If you need to know a minor triad, adjust the 3rd of the major triad down a half step to make it minor. 4. If you need to know an Augmented triad, adjust the 5th of the chord up a half step from the MAJOR triad. -
The 17-Tone Puzzle — and the Neo-Medieval Key That Unlocks It
The 17-tone Puzzle — And the Neo-medieval Key That Unlocks It by George Secor A Grave Misunderstanding The 17 division of the octave has to be one of the most misunderstood alternative tuning systems available to the microtonal experimenter. In comparison with divisions such as 19, 22, and 31, it has two major advantages: not only are its fifths better in tune, but it is also more manageable, considering its very reasonable number of tones per octave. A third advantage becomes apparent immediately upon hearing diatonic melodies played in it, one note at a time: 17 is wonderful for melody, outshining both the twelve-tone equal temperament (12-ET) and the Pythagorean tuning in this respect. The most serious problem becomes apparent when we discover that diatonic harmony in this system sounds highly dissonant, considerably more so than is the case with either 12-ET or the Pythagorean tuning, on which we were hoping to improve. Without any further thought, most experimenters thus consign the 17-tone system to the discard pile, confident in the knowledge that there are, after all, much better alternatives available. My own thinking about 17 started in exactly this way. In 1976, having been a microtonal experimenter for thirteen years, I went on record, dismissing 17-ET in only a couple of sentences: The 17-tone equal temperament is of questionable harmonic utility. If you try it, I doubt you’ll stay with it for long.1 Since that time I have become aware of some things which have caused me to change my opinion completely. -
Shifting Exercises with Double Stops to Test Intonation
VERY ROUGH AND PRELIMINARY DRAFT!!! Shifting Exercises with Double Stops to Test Intonation These exercises were inspired by lessons I had from 1968 to 1970 with David Smiley of the San Francisco Symphony. I don’t have the book he used, but I believe it was one those written by Dounis on the scientific or artist's technique of violin playing. The exercises were difficult and frustrating, and involved shifting and double stops. Smiley also emphasized routine testing notes against other strings, and I also found some of his tasks frustrating because I couldn’t hear intervals that apparently seemed so familiar to a professional musician. When I found myself giving violin lessons in 2011, I had a mathematical understanding of why it was so difficult to hear certain musical intervals, and decided not to focus on them in my teaching. By then I had also developed some exercises to develop my own intonation. These exercises focus entirely on what is called the just scale. Pianos use the equal tempered scale, which is the predominate choice of intonation in orchestras and symphonies (I NEED VERIFICATION THAT THIS IS TRUE). It takes many years and many types of exercises and activities to become a good violinist. But I contend that everyone should start by mastering the following double stops in “just” intonation: 1. Practice the intervals shown above for all possible pairs of strings on your violin or viola. Learn the first two first, then add one interval at a time. They get harder to hear as you go down the list for reasons having to do with the fractions: 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 3/5, 4/5, 5/6. -
Generalized Interval System and Its Applications
Generalized Interval System and Its Applications Minseon Song May 17, 2014 Abstract Transformational theory is a modern branch of music theory developed by David Lewin. This theory focuses on the transformation of musical objects rather than the objects them- selves to find meaningful patterns in both tonal and atonal music. A generalized interval system is an integral part of transformational theory. It takes the concept of an interval, most commonly used with pitches, and through the application of group theory, generalizes beyond pitches. In this paper we examine generalized interval systems, beginning with the definition, then exploring the ways they can be transformed, and finally explaining com- monly used musical transformation techniques with ideas from group theory. We then apply the the tools given to both tonal and atonal music. A basic understanding of group theory and post tonal music theory will be useful in fully understanding this paper. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 A Crash Course in Music Theory 2 3 Introduction to the Generalized Interval System 8 4 Transforming GISs 11 5 Developmental Techniques in GIS 13 5.1 Transpositions . 14 5.2 Interval Preserving Functions . 16 5.3 Inversion Functions . 18 5.4 Interval Reversing Functions . 23 6 Rhythmic GIS 24 7 Application of GIS 28 7.1 Analysis of Atonal Music . 28 7.1.1 Luigi Dallapiccola: Quaderno Musicale di Annalibera, No. 3 . 29 7.1.2 Karlheinz Stockhausen: Kreuzspiel, Part 1 . 34 7.2 Analysis of Tonal Music: Der Spiegel Duet . 38 8 Conclusion 41 A Just Intonation 44 1 1 Introduction David Lewin(1933 - 2003) is an American music theorist. -
Frequency Ratios and the Perception of Tone Patterns
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1 (2), 191-201 Frequency ratios and the perception of tone patterns E. GLENN SCHELLENBERG University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada and SANDRA E. TREHUB University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada We quantified the relative simplicity of frequency ratios and reanalyzed data from several studies on the perception of simultaneous and sequential tones. Simplicity offrequency ratios accounted for judgments of consonance and dissonance and for judgments of similarity across a wide range of tasks and listeners. It also accounted for the relative ease of discriminating tone patterns by musically experienced and inexperienced listeners. These findings confirm the generality ofpre vious suggestions of perceptual processing advantages for pairs of tones related by simple fre quency ratios. Since the time of Pythagoras, the relative simplicity of monics of a single complex tone. Currently, the degree the frequency relations between tones has been consid of perceived consonance is believed to result from both ered fundamental to consonance (pleasantness) and dis sensory and experiential factors. Whereas sensory con sonance (unpleasantness) in music. Most naturally OCCUf sonance is constant across musical styles and cultures, mu ring tones (e.g., the sounds of speech or music) are sical consonance presumably results from learning what complex, consisting of multiple pure-tone (sine wave) sounds pleasant in a particular musical style. components. Terhardt (1974, 1978, 1984) has suggested Helmholtz (1885/1954) proposed that the consonance that relations between different tones may be influenced of two simultaneous complex tones is a function of the by relations between components of a single complex tone. ratio between their fundamental frequencies-the simpler For single complex tones, ineluding those of speech and the ratio, the more harmonics the tones have in common. -
Vocal Similarity Predicts the Relative Attraction of Musical Chords
Vocal similarity predicts the relative attraction of musical chords Daniel L. Bowlinga,1, Dale Purvesb,1, and Kamraan Z. Gillc aDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria; bDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; and cDepartment of Pathology, CBLPath, Rye Brook, NY 10573 Contributed by D. Purves, November 21, 2017 (sent for review July 27, 2017; reviewed by Aniruddh D. Patel and Laurel J. Trainor) Musical chords are combinations of two or more tones played to conspecific vocalization. Accordingly, we here ask whether the together. While many different chords are used in music, some are consonance of tone combinations in music can be rationalized on heard as more attractive (consonant) than others. We have pre- this basis: that is, whether our attraction to specific chords is pre- viously suggested that, for reasons of biological advantage, human dicted by their relative similarity to human vocalization. tonal preferences can be understood in terms of the spectral Answering this question requires perceptual data that docu- similarity of tone combinations to harmonic human vocalizations. ment the relative consonance of chords. Previous evaluations have Using the chromatic scale, we tested this theory further by focused on the two-tone combinations (“dyads”) that define the assessing the perceived consonance of all possible dyads, triads, chromatic scale, a set of 12 tones over an octave used in much and tetrads within a single octave. Our results show that the music worldwide (Table S1). Studies of dyadic consonance have consonance of chords is predicted by their relative similarity to been repeated many times over the last century and, despite some voiced speech sounds. -
Musical Techniques
Musical Techniques Musical Techniques Frequencies and Harmony Dominique Paret Serge Sibony First published 2017 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address: ISTE Ltd John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 27-37 St George’s Road 111 River Street London SW19 4EU Hoboken, NJ 07030 UK USA www.iste.co.uk www.wiley.com © ISTE Ltd 2017 The rights of Dominique Paret and Serge Sibony to be identified as the authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Library of Congress Control Number: 2016960997 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-78630-058-4 Contents Preface ........................................... xiii Introduction ........................................ xv Part 1. Laying the Foundations ............................ 1 Introduction to Part 1 .................................. 3 Chapter 1. Sounds, Creation and Generation of Notes ................................... 5 1.1. Physical and physiological notions of a sound .................. 5 1.1.1. Auditory apparatus ............................... 5 1.1.2. Physical concepts of a sound .......................... 7 1.1.3. -
A LIGHTWEIGHT NOTATION for PLAYING PIANO for FUN by R.J.A
A LIGHTWEIGHT NOTATION FOR PLAYING PIANO FOR FUN by R.J.A. Buhr 1. INTRODUCTION Music notation gets in the way of the joy of making music on the piano that can be had without first spending thousands of hours at the keyboard to develop piano “wizardry,” meaning a combination of keyboard skill and mastery of music notation. The message of this document is the joy can be had, without any loss of musical substance, with no more wizardry than is required to read and play single melody lines. The vehicle is a lightweight notation I call PKP (for Picturing Keyboard Patterns) for annotating the core flow of harmony in interval terms above the staff. I developed the notation as an adult beginner with no training in music theory after becoming frustrated with the way music notation obscures the keyboard simplicity of harmony. That the notation has substance in spite of this humble origin is indicated by the following opinion of PKP provided by a music theorist specializing in improvisational music (see supplementary pages): “The hook ... , at least in my opinion, is that it's possible to attain a deep understanding of chords (and their constituent intervals) without recourse to Western notation. This has direct consequences for physical patterning, fingerings, etc. Essentially, your method combines the utility of a play-by-ear approach with the depth of a mathematically-informed theory of music.” PKP follows from two observations that anyone can make. One is the piano keyboard supplies only 12 piano keys to play all the notes of an octave that music notation describes in many more than 12 ways by key signatures and accidentals (sharps, flats, naturals). -
Part-Writing Rules.FH9
Important Rules for 4-Part Progressions In general, some theorists (including Ottman and myself) try to spend most of our time telling you what to do rather than what not to do. If you internalize all of our little procedures then you should be able to churn out progressions quickly and easily without really worrying about making mistakes. However, there are times when you really have to be familiar with the rules. Ottman sprinkles many of these around the later chapters of the text, and he tries to summarize everything you need to know in his Appendix A. Ive produced my own summary because I have a few slightly different ideas of what needs emphasis or de-emphasis. Please compare what I say here to what Ottman says. Making each triad Doubling the root. For triads in root position, try to cover all three chord tones in your upper voices. That means you will end up doubling the root. all three tones present doubled root Doubling any other tone in a root-position Ottman (p. 95) teaches that sometimes at triad will happen occasionally, but it is cadences you will end up tripling the root (and considered less good. I will sometimes subtract leaving out the fifth.) Use this for cadences a point for these bad doublings. only. (If you do it in the middle of a progression it will probably cause bad parallels afterwards.) LESS GOOD doubled doubled 3rd 5th tripled root IVI ©2004 Dave Smey. Reproduction and classroom use freely permitted. Using proper spacing (open position) Adjacent upper voices are not allowed to be more than an octave apart. -
Concise Manual of Harmony, Intended for the Reading of Spiritual Music in Russia (1874)
Gamut: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 3 May 2014 Concise Manual of Harmony, Intended for the Reading of Spiritual Music in Russia (1874) Piotr Illyich Tchaikovsky Liliya Shamazov (ed. and trans.) Stuyvesant High School, NYC, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/gamut Part of the Composition Commons, Music Pedagogy Commons, Music Theory Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Tchaikovsky, Piotr Illyich and Shamazov, Liliya (ed. and trans.) (2014) "Concise Manual of Harmony, Intended for the Reading of Spiritual Music in Russia (1874)," Gamut: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/gamut/vol7/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Gamut: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/gamut. CONCISE MANUAL OF HARMONY, INTENDED FOR THE READING OF SPIRITUAL MUSIC IN RUSSIA (1874) PIOTR ILLYICH TCHAIKOVSKY he presented study is nothing more than a reduction of my Textbook of Harmony T written for the theoretical course at the Moscow Conservatory. While constructing it, I was led by the desire to facilitate the conscious attitude of choir teachers and Church choir directors towards our Church music, while not interfering by any means into the critical rating of the works of our spiritual music composers. -
11 – Music Temperament and Pitch
11 – Music temperament and pitch Music sounds Every music instrument, including the voice, uses a more or less well defined sequence of music sounds, the notes, to produce music. The notes have particular frequencies that are called „pitch“ by musicians. The frequencies or pitches of the notes stand in a particular relation to each other. There are and were different ways to build a system of music sounds in different geographical regions during different historical periods. We will consider only the currently dominating system (used in classical and pop music) that was originated in ancient Greece and further developed in Europe. Pitch vs interval Only a small part of the people with normal hearing are able to percieve the absolute frequency of a sound. These people, who are said to have the „absolute pitch“, can tell what key has been hit on a piano without looking at it. The human ear and brain is much more sensitive to the relations between the frequencies of two or more sounds, the music intervals. The intervals carry emotional content that makes music an art. For instance, the major third sounds joyful and affirmative whereas the minor third sounds sad. The system of frequency relations between the sounds used in music production is called music temperament . 1 Music intervals and overtone series Perfect music intervals (that cannot be fully achieved practically, see below) are based on the overtone series studied before in this course. A typical music sound (except of a pure sinusiodal one) consists of a fundamental frequency f1 and its overtones: = = fn nf 1, n 3,2,1 ,..