Mermithid Parasitism of Black Flies (Diptera: Simuliidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mermithid Parasitism of Black Flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) Mermithid Peresitism of Bleck Flies (Diptere: Simuliidee) ~ Daniel P. Molloy 2 Abstract: Mermithid nematodes are common parasites of black flies and play a significant role in the natural regulation of these medically important insects. Infection levels tend to he moderate and perennial, with epizootics rare and highly localized. Mermithid parasitism almost invariably results in the death of the black fly, and thus considerable attention has focused on the potential of these nematodes as biocontrol agents. Early instar black fly larvae appear most susceptible to infection, and integumental penetration hy mermithid preparasites is the only known mode of entry. Postparasitic nematodes typically emerge before host pupation. However, carryover of parasitism into adult simuliids is an important mechanism for local dispersal and recolonization of upstream areas. Folhtwing emergence, the mermithids molt to the adult stage. Copulation ensues, the females then laying eggs which eventually give rise to the next generation of infective preparasites. The number of described species is conservatively estimated at 35-40, with most species within the genera Mesomermis, Gastromermis, and Isomermis. The taxonomy of this group of mermithids is a challenging and little explored area. Host-specificity statements, therefore, must be made cautiously because of these systematic problems and others within the Simuliidae. In most instances, temporal and spatial factors limit the host range of these mermithids among simuliid species. Differential susceptibilities anmng larvae concurrently present within the same microhabitat probably reflect varying degrees of host attractiveness and behavioral-physiological resistance. Effects of parasitism on the host may include prevention of metamorphosis, sterility, intersexual development, and behavior modification. Evaluation of the technical feasibility of mermithid control of black flies has been stymied by the limitations of current inoculum-production technology. Continued advances in in vivo and in vitro culture methods are required to accelerate the research process. Key words: Mermithidae, bionotnics, systematics, host specificity, host-parasite relationship, biological control, Mesomermis, Gastromer- mis, Isomermis. "On coming downstairs on Aug. 16th, I natural regulation (4,38,59). Infection levels saw a small Dipteron (Simulium ornatum) tend to be moderate (3-15%) and peren- on the windowpane, and this insect seemed nial, with epizootics rare and highly lo- to enjoy its usual activity until a drop of calized (12,26,28,53,56). Nevertheless, mer- benzine proved fatal. I then mounted it on mithids have occasionally been reported to a slip of cardboard, when what seemed a cause drastic population reductions (38,60). huge cabbage-green snake-like creature sud- Although recorded from black fly popu- denly crept forth from its abdomen." (55). lations throughout the world, mermithid The above is one of the earliest and most parasites appear to have sporadic local dis- colorful descriptions of mermithid para- tributions--a condition due in part to their sitism of black flies. The Mermithidae para- limited dispersal capabilities. For example, sitize a wide variety of invertebrates. In the surveys conducted in Newfoundland (15) class Insecta at least 17 orders, including and Wisconsin (3) found that only 30 and more than 100 families, have been recorded 23% of the streams, respectively, contained as hosts (39). Welch (59) cited at least 153 mermithid-parasitized black flies. reports of mermithid parasitism of black Because infection almost invariably re- flies; at least another 50 have appeared since sults in host death, considerable attention his 1964 review. has been focused on these parasites as po- Mermithids are common parasites of tential black fly biocontrol agents (23,48). simuliids and play a significant role in their In Central America and Africa, black flies are intermediate hosts and vectors of Onchocerca volvulus, a filarioid nematode Received for publication 12 December 1980, which causes human onchocerciasis--a vision XSymposium paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Nematologists, New Orleans, Louisiana, Au- impairing disease estimated to afflict more gust 1980. Published by permission of the Director, New than 20 million people. Since present con- York State Museum, State Education Department, Journal Series No. 321. trol efforts rely solely on chemical larvicides, 2Senior Scientist. Biological Survey, New York State the development of biological agents for Museum, State Education Department, Albany, NY 12230. Continuing financial support from the National Institutes incorporation into an integrated control of Health (AI-15605) is gratefully acknowledged. The program is needed. Mermithids are leading author thanks J. R. Finney and R. R. Gaugler for critical review of the manuscript. candidates for such a role. 250 Mermithids and Black Flies: Molloy 251 BIONOMICS However, per os entry (ingestion of either an egg or juvenile) should not be ruled out, The infective stage is the newly hatched, since it has been reported for mermithids preparasitic nematode, and all evidence in- parasitic in other insects (11,41). Others dicates that early instar black flies are most (38,54,60) have suggested that some black susceptible to invasion (9,17,31,60). Mer- fly mermithids enter their hosts by penetra- mithid life cycles are synchronized with tion of the gut wall, but conclusive evidence those of their hosts, preparasite hatch oc- curring during periods when susceptible of this mode of entry has not been offered. The juvenile derives its nourishment larval instars are present (12,16,60). from the host's hemolymph. Transcuticular The mode of penetration is unknown nutrient uptake through the nematode's for almost all mermithid species parasitic in body wall has been demonstrated for mer- black flies. The two exceptions are Iso- mithid parasites of grasshoppers (49,50), and mermis lairdi (33) and Mesomermis (= a recent uhrastructural study of the black Neomesornermis) flurnenalis sensu lato (2, fly parasite Gastromermis boophthorae has 31). Preparasites of I. lairdi are captured by provided evidence that transcuticular up- the cephalic fans of feeding black flies and penetrate the larval cuticle in the cephalic take also occurs in this mermithid (7). region. Preparasites of M. flumenalis s. l. When the nematode has completed its crawl on the streambed in search of hosts development within the abdomen o£ the (31). In a successful attack, a M. flumenalis black fly, it emerges to resume a free-living preparasite typically attaches itself to the existence. Postparasitic emergence typically thoracic region of the black fly larva, out of occurs during the larval stage of the black reach of the larva's mandibles, and coils fly, usually at the time uninfected flies in tightly around the larva. The black fly the population are pupating. The peak moves in quick jerking motions, opening emergence of male mermithids often pre- and closing its mandibles in a vain attempt ceeds that of the females (5). Emergence to grasp the nematode. The integument is generally occurs through the intersegmental soon pierced by the stylet, and within a few areas of the larval abdomen, but penetration minutes the preparasite uncoils and passes of the gut wall and exit through natural into the larva's hemocoel. During this pe- openings have also been observed. The riod and for several minutes thereafter, the length of a postparasite is 1-4 times that of its host, the length varying inversely with black fly appears to be paralyzed, with the number of mermithids per host. its body often in a contorted position. Al- though normal movement and feeding Although development of some mer- gradually resume within an hour after pene- mithids appears to occur solely within larval tration, this temporary paralysis eliminates simuliids (30), pupation and emergence of further defensive tactics by a larva and infected black flies has frequently been re- ensures successful penetration by the pre- ported (12,29,37,47,51). Parasitism of adult parasite. In laboratory trials (Molloy, un- simuliids is advantageous to mermithid published data) such defenseless, paralyzed populations, since it provides a mechanism larvae were observed to be easily attacked for dispersal of these nematodes to neigh- and penetrated by other preparasites in the boring streams and allows recolonization of vicinity. Wiilker (63) reported a similar upstream areas (black flies migrate upstream "paralysis" in chironomid larvae attacked to oviposit) (59). by Gastromermis rosea and suggested that After host emergence, the postparasites the paralysis was induced by injection of a molt to adults, mate, and lay eggs to pro- substance into the host's hemocoel by the duce a new generation of preparasites; these preparasite. Wiilker's hypothesis is plausi- free-living stages in the life cycle occur ble, and it is here suggested that the pre- within the streambed. Immediately after parasite's penetration glands might be the emergence, many postparasites lose their source of such a muscle-paralyzing fluid. hold on substrates and are carried down- It is likely that preparasite penetration stream. Infection loci, however, are likely of the integument is a common mode of maintained in upstream areas by those post- entry for mermithids parasitic in black flies. parasites which are capable of crawling di- 252 Journal o I Nematology, Volume 13, No. 3, July 1981 rectly down into the
Recommended publications
  • The Black Flies of Maine
    THE BLACK FLIES OF MAINE L.S. Bauer and J. Granett Department of Entomology University of Maine at Orono, Orono, ME 04469 Maine Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 95 May 1979 LS-\ F.\PFRi\ii-Nr Si \IION TK HNK \I BUI I HIN 9? ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank Dr. Ivan McDaniel for his involvement in the USDA-funding of this project. We thank him for his assistance at the beginning of this project in loaning us literature, equipment, and giving us pointers on taxonomy. He also aided the second author on a number of collection trips and identified a number of collection specimens. We thank Edward R. Bauer, Lt. Lewis R. Boobar, Mr. Thomas Haskins. Ms. Leslie Schimmel, Mr. James Eckler, and Mr. Jan Nyrop for assistance in field collections, sorting, and identifications. Mr. Ber- nie May made the electrophoretic identifications. This project was supported by grant funds from the United States Department of Agriculture under CSRS agreement No. 616-15-94 and Regional Project NE 118, Hatch funds, and the Maine Towns of Brad­ ford, Brownville. East Millinocket, Enfield, Lincoln, Millinocket. Milo, Old Town. Orono. and Maine counties of Penobscot and Piscataquis, and the State of Maine. The electrophoretic work was supported in part by a faculty research grant from the University of Maine at Orono. INTRODUCTION Black flies have been long-time residents of Maine and cause exten­ sive nuisance problems for people, domestic animals, and wildlife. The black fly problem has no simple solution because of the multitude of species present, the diverse and ecologically sensitive habitats in which they are found, and the problems inherent in measuring the extent of the damage they cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae) Parasite–Host Association
    2006. The Journal of Arachnology 34:273–278 SHORT COMMUNICATION FIRST UNEQUIVOCAL MERMITHID–LINYPHIID (ARANEAE) PARASITE–HOST ASSOCIATION David Penney: Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Susan P. Bennett: Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK. ABSTRACT. The first description of a Mermithidae–Linyphiidae parasite–host association is presented. The nematode is preserved exiting the abdomen of the host, which is a juvenile Tenuiphantes species (Araneae, Linyphiidae), collected from the Isle of Mull, UK. An updated taxonomic list of known mer- mithid spider hosts is provided. The ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the direct and indirect life cycles of mermithid worms suggests that both occur in spiders. Keywords: Aranimermis, Isle of Mull, Linyphiidae, Mermithidae, Nematoda Nematode parasites of spiders are restricted to an updated and taxonomically correct list in Table the family Mermithidae but are not uncommon 1. Here we describe the first Mermithidae–Liny- (Poinar 1985, 1987) and were first reported almost phiidae parasite–host association and discuss the two and a half centuries ago (Roesel 1761). How- ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the ever, given the difficulty of identifying and rearing life cycles of mermithid worms. post-parasitic juvenile mermithids, they have re- This paper concerns three spider specimens, one ceived inadequate systematic treatment (Poinar with a worm in situ and two that are presumed to 1985). In addition, the complete life history is have been parasitized, but from which the worms known for only one species of these spider parasites have emerged and are lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Helminth Eggs from Early Cretaceous Faeces Sandra Barrios‑De Pedro1*, Antonio Osuna2,3 & Ángela D
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Helminth eggs from early cretaceous faeces Sandra Barrios‑de Pedro1*, Antonio Osuna2,3 & Ángela D. Buscalioni1 The exceptional fossil site of Las Hoyas (upper Barremian, Cuenca, Spain) yields abundant small to medium vertebrate coprolites, hindering the search for parasites. We studied the contents of 29 coprolites that were previously classifed into distinct morphotypes. Several parasitic eggs were retrieved from two of these coprolites, confrming the second record of digenea trematode eggs and nematode (ascaridid) eggs from an Early Cretaceous locality. The cylindrical coprolite containing anisakid eggs was likely produced by a crocodylomorph as the parasite host, whereas the bump‑headed lace coprolite indicates the role of a fsh as an intermediary or defnitive host of the trematodes and ascaridids. These trace and body fossils show that the Las Hoyas 126–129 Ma lacustrine ecosystem documents the early connection between basal Gonorynchiformes fsh and digenetic trematodes. Te identifcation of parasitic material in coprolites (fossil faeces) remains a challenge, but can provide sub- stantial information on the habitat of parasitic hosts and the feeding habits of infected animals. However, the identifcation of parasites in fossil faeces is complex since such parasites must be accurately located to avoid their destruction. Furthermore, these parasites need to be preserved and they must be recognized according to their modern analogues. Fossil parasites are mostly in eggs and cysts whose preservation depends on the presence of layers that degrade slowly and conditions that favour the integrity of the faecal mass. For example, preserva- tion of coprolites bearing parasite remains would have been aided by quick drying to prevent the dispersion of parasitic elements, occurring in an anaerobic environment to slow the destruction of the faecal mass by bacteria and fungi, and quick covering by microbial bioflms and mats1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographia Trichopterorum
    Entry numbers checked/adjusted: 23/10/12 Bibliographia Trichopterorum Volume 4 1991-2000 (Preliminary) ©Andrew P.Nimmo 106-29 Ave NW, EDMONTON, Alberta, Canada T6J 4H6 e-mail: [email protected] [As at 25/3/14] 2 LITERATURE CITATIONS [*indicates that I have a copy of the paper in question] 0001 Anon. 1993. Studies on the structure and function of river ecosystems of the Far East, 2. Rep. on work supported by Japan Soc. Promot. Sci. 1992. 82 pp. TN. 0002 * . 1994. Gunter Brückerman. 19.12.1960 12.2.1994. Braueria 21:7. [Photo only]. 0003 . 1994. New kind of fly discovered in Man.[itoba]. Eco Briefs, Edmonton Journal. Sept. 4. 0004 . 1997. Caddis biodiversity. Weta 20:40-41. ZRan 134-03000625 & 00002404. 0005 . 1997. Rote Liste gefahrdeter Tiere und Pflanzen des Burgenlandes. BFB-Ber. 87: 1-33. ZRan 135-02001470. 0006 1998. Floods have their benefits. Current Sci., Weekly Reader Corp. 84(1):12. 0007 . 1999. Short reports. Taxa new to Finland, new provincial records and deletions from the fauna of Finland. Ent. Fenn. 10:1-5. ZRan 136-02000496. 0008 . 2000. Entomology report. Sandnats 22(3):10-12, 20. ZRan 137-09000211. 0009 . 2000. Short reports. Ent. Fenn. 11:1-4. ZRan 136-03000823. 0010 * . 2000. Nattsländor - Trichoptera. pp 285-296. In: Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2000. The 2000 Red List of Swedish species. ed. U.Gärdenfors. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala. ISBN 91 88506 23 1 0011 Aagaard, K., J.O.Solem, T.Nost, & O.Hanssen. 1997. The macrobenthos of the pristine stre- am, Skiftesaa, Haeylandet, Norway. Hydrobiologia 348:81-94.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 New Fossil Nematodes in Dominican and Baltic Amber George O
    New fossil nematodes in Dominican and Baltic amber George O POINAR JR Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Received: 2011: revised: 2011 Accepted for publication: 2011 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Summary- Four new species of fossil mermithids (Nematoda: Mermithidae) are described from amber: Heydenius arachnius n. sp. from a spider (Arachnida: Araneae) in Dominican amber, Heydenius phasmatophilus n. sp., from a walking stick (Phasmatodea: Phasmatidae) in Baltic amber, Heydenius podenasae n. sp. from a moth (Lepidoptera) in Baltic amber and Heydenius trichorosus n. sp. from a caddis fly (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) in Baltic amber. With previous descriptions of fossil mermithids from Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera and Hemiptera, there are now representatives of seven insect orders as hosts of fossil mermithids. With these additional four fossils, the total number of described nematode fossils is now 90 with 70 occurring in amber. Keywords – Heydenius arachnius, Heydenius phasmatophilus, Heydenius podenasae, Heydenius trichorosus, Lepidoptera, Trichoptera, Phasmatodea. 2 After publication of The evolutionary history of nematodes (Poinar, 2011), several new nematode fossils were made available to the author. These specimens, which are described in the present work, include mermithids infecting a spider in Dominican amber and a moth, caddis fly and walking stick in Baltic amber. Materials and methods The piece of amber containing the fossil spider originated from mines in the Cordillera Septentrional mountain range in the northern portion of the Dominican Republic. Dating of Dominican amber is controversial with the latest proposed age of 20-15 mya based on foraminifera (Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1996) and the earliest of 45-30 mya based on coccoliths (Cêpek in Schlee, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Cucumber Beetle, Diabrotica Balteata Leconte (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)1 John L
    EENY-093 Banded Cucumber Beetle, Diabrotica balteata LeConte (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Introduction and Distribution Larva The banded cucumber beetle is basically a tropical insect, The three instars have mean head capsule widths measuring and until the early 1900s, its distribution in the United about 0.24, 0.35, and 0.51 mm, respectively. The body States was limited to southern Arizona and Texas (Saba length during these instars is reported to be about 2.3, 4.5, 1970), and south through Mexico and Central America and 8.9 mm. Larval color is somewhat variable; initially it is (Krysan 1986). It has since expanded its range throughout white, but may also take on a pale yellow color depending the southern United States from North Carolina to on the food source. Development time is temperature southern California, though its intolerance to freezing dependent, but the range is about 4–8, 3–11, and 4–15 days temperatures probably limits its northward distribution for instars 1 to 3, respectively. Total larval development to its current status. Within Florida it is most abundant in time is usually 11–17 days. the organic soils near Lake Okeechobee, though it occurs throughout the state, where it is known as a vegetable pest. Life Cycle and Description The banded cucumber beetle does not enter diapause (Saba 1970). It remains active as long as the weather remains favorable, with up to six to seven generations per year reported in Louisiana (Pitre and Kantack 1962) and Texas. Under optimal conditions, a life cycle can be completed in 45 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling the 99%: Can We Begin to Understand the Paleoecology of the Small and Soft-Bodied Animal Majority?
    TACKLING THE 99%: CAN WE BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND THE PALEOECOLOGY OF THE SMALL AND SOFT-BODIED ANIMAL MAJORITY? ERIK A. SPERLING Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA <[email protected]> ABSTRACT.—Not all organisms have an equal chance of entering the fossil record. Previo—us attempts to quantify this percentage suggest that for megascopic marine organisms (megafauna), ~30% would be predicted to leave no identifiable fossils. Here, that exercise is repeated for marine macrofauna, for which ~80% are predicted to leave no identifiable fossils. The percentage will be far higher for meiofauna, the numerically most dominant marine animals. The organisms which are often most abundant in marine sediments, such as small polychaetes and nematodes, have essentially no fossil record. Yet such organisms are ecologically important in the modern oceans, and almost certainly were in ancient environments as well, so it is useful to consider the roles they play in different ecosystems. Insight into the evolution and paleoecology of these groups can be gained by using molecular divergence estimates to infer temporal origins combined with modern distributional and ecological data. As a case study, this approach is applied to the small and soft-bodied early animal fauna living under low levels of atmospheric oxygen that likely characterized the Precambrian. INTRODUCTION circumstances. In a seminal study of the megascopic intertidal fauna at Friday Harbor, “Here we have a fossil: what went wrong?” Washington, Schopf (1978) predicted that ~30% of species would leave many identifiable fossils, —Adolf Seilacher (2006, Extraordinary Glimpses regardless of whether they lived on mud, sand, or of Past Life course, Yale University) rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects: Holometabola – Diptera, Suborder Nematocera
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Aquatic Insects: Holometabola – Diptera, Suborder Nematocera. Chapt. 11-13b. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 11-13b-1 Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 15 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 11-13b AQUATIC INSECTS: HOLOMETABOLA – DIPTERA, SUBORDER NEMATOCERA TABLE OF CONTENTS Suborder Nematocera, continued ........................................................................................................... 11-13b-2 Chironomidae – Midges .................................................................................................................. 11-13b-2 Emergence ............................................................................................................................... 11-13b-4 Seasons .................................................................................................................................... 11-13b-5 Cold-water Species .................................................................................................................. 11-13b-6 Overwintering .......................................................................................................................... 11-13b-7 Current Velocity ...................................................................................................................... 11-13b-7 Diversity .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poinar, G . O ., Jr . 1985 . Mermithid (Nematoda) Parasites of Spiders
    Poinar, G . O ., Jr. 1985 . Mermithid (Nematoda) parasites of spiders and harvestmen . J. Arachnol ., 13 :121-128 . MERMITHID (NEMATODA) PARASITE S OF SPIDERS AND HARVESTME N George O. Poinar, Jr. Division of Entomology and Parasitology University of Californi a Berkeley, California 9472 0 ABSTRACT Nematode parasites of spiders and harvestmen are restricted to members of the family Mermithi- dae. A literature review shows that nematode parasitism of arachnids is worldwide and at least 5 1 species of spiders and harvestmen have been recorded as hosts of mermithid nematodes . Infected spiders have varied habits and it is postulated that two types of parasite life cycles probably exist and that the indirect life cycle (involving a paratenic host which falls prey to the arachnid) is probably th e common type . INTRODUCTION Representatives of the family Mermithidae are the only nematodes known to parasitize spiders. Their effect on spiders is similar to that on other arthropod hosts, namely hos t mortality at the time of parasite emergence . The difficulty in rearing adult mermithids from postparasitic juveniles that have emerged from parasitized spiders has prevented a systematic assessment of spider mer- mithids . However, it is apparent that mermithid parasitism of spiders is widespread an d occurs in various habitats . The present work tabulates previous instances of these associa- tions, adds some, and discusses the host parasite relationship . Reports of spider parasitism by horsehair worms are not discussed here . The latter, commonly referred to as Gordius, are not nematodes and belong to a separate phylum, the Nematomorpha . Early reports o f spiders parasitized by the horsehair worms may actually have involved mermithid nema- todes and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Preliminary Studies on the Pathology Caused by Mermis nigrescens Duj. in Orthoptera Melvin W. Denner Department of Life Sciences Indiana State University Evansville, Evansville, Indiana 47712 Abstract Parasitic Mermis nigrescens Duj. juveniles may cause tissue damage during migra- tion within the host. As these juveniles develop, they may cause tissue distortion, under- development of structures, and mechanical damage to tissue. Mechanical damage by the parasite may act to reduce the number of eggs laid by the host grasshopper. Introduction The importance of mermithids as a possible means of biological control of insect pests has been recognized by a number of investigators (1, 6, 10, 11). The Uuited States Bureau of Plant Industry has used Agamermis decaudata and Mermis subnigrescens in an effort to control grasshopper populations. The government has also used members of the Mermithidae to control mosquito populations in the Arctic (2). Japansese investigators have reported that mermithids, parasitic in the rice borer, help to keep this pest within bounds (7, 12). The purpose of this paper is to present some of the initial observa- tions on the damage that M. nigrescens causes to the internal tissues of several host species of Orthoptera. These observations will be used to determine the extent of damage caused by the parasite and how this damage may play a role in the biological control of economically impor- tant Orthoptera. Methods All grasshoppers in this study were sacrificed using ethyl ether, then fixed in Bouin's fixative, washed in several changes of 50% ethyl alcohol, one change of 70% alcohol containing one per cent potassium acetate, and dehydrated according to the Martignoni (9) methyl benzoate method.
    [Show full text]
  • Burmese Amber Taxa
    Burmese (Myanmar) amber taxa, on-line checklist v.2018.1 Andrew J. Ross 15/05/2018 Principal Curator of Palaeobiology Department of Natural Sciences National Museums Scotland Chambers St. Edinburgh EH1 1JF E-mail: [email protected] http://www.nms.ac.uk/collections-research/collections-departments/natural-sciences/palaeobiology/dr- andrew-ross/ This taxonomic list is based on Ross et al (2010) plus non-arthropod taxa and published papers up to the end of April 2018. It does not contain unpublished records or records from papers in press (including on- line proofs) or unsubstantiated on-line records. Often the final versions of papers were published on-line the year before they appeared in print, so the on-line published year is accepted and referred to accordingly. Note, the authorship of species does not necessarily correspond to the full authorship of papers where they were described. The latest high level classification is used where possible though in some cases conflicts were encountered, usually due to cladistic studies, so in these cases an older classification was adopted for convenience. The classification for Hexapoda follows Nicholson et al. (2015), plus subsequent papers. † denotes extinct orders and families. New additions or taxonomic changes to the previous list (v.2017.4) are marked in blue, corrections are marked in red. The list comprises 37 classes (or similar rank), 99 orders (or similar rank), 510 families, 713 genera and 916 species. This includes 8 classes, 64 orders, 467 families, 656 genera and 849 species of arthropods. 1 Some previously recorded families have since been synonymised or relegated to subfamily level- these are included in parentheses in the main list below.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Natural Enemies of Beetles in the Subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Implications for Sustainable Pest Management S
    This article was downloaded by: [USDA National Agricultural Library] On: 13 May 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 908592637] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biocontrol Science and Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713409232 A review of the natural enemies of beetles in the subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): implications for sustainable pest management S. Toepfer a; T. Haye a; M. Erlandson b; M. Goettel c; J. G. Lundgren d; R. G. Kleespies e; D. C. Weber f; G. Cabrera Walsh g; A. Peters h; R. -U. Ehlers i; H. Strasser j; D. Moore k; S. Keller l; S. Vidal m; U. Kuhlmann a a CABI Europe-Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland b Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada c Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada d NCARL, USDA-ARS, Brookings, SD, USA e Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Biological Control, Darmstadt, Germany f IIBBL, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA g South American USDA-ARS, Buenos Aires, Argentina h e-nema, Schwentinental, Germany i Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany j University of Innsbruck, Austria k CABI, Egham, UK l Agroscope ART, Reckenholz, Switzerland m University of Goettingen, Germany Online Publication Date: 01 January 2009 To cite this Article Toepfer, S., Haye, T., Erlandson, M., Goettel, M., Lundgren, J. G., Kleespies, R. G., Weber, D. C., Walsh, G. Cabrera, Peters, A., Ehlers, R. -U., Strasser, H., Moore, D., Keller, S., Vidal, S.
    [Show full text]