DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C Regionally Occurring Special- Status Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C Regionally Occurring Special- Status Species Appendix C Regionally Occurring Special- Status Species Regulatory Status (Federal/State/ Identification/ Special-Status Species Local/S) Habitat Requirements Survey Period Potential for Occurrence Fish Hypomesus transpacificus FT/CT/-- Found in estuarine waters. Majority of life span is Consult Agency No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Delta smelt spent within the freshwater outskirts of the mixing species. zone (saltwater-freshwater interface) within the Delta. Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus FT/--/-- Spawning occurs in heads of riffles or tails of pools Consult Agency No. The project site does not provide habitat for this pop. 8 with beds of loose gravel (< 15 centimeters average species. Central California Coast diameter) and deep pools, undercut banks, or logs steelhead nearby. Spirinchus thaleichthys --/CT/-- Found close to shore, in bays and estuaries and ascends Consult Agency No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Longfin smelt coastal streams to spawn. species. Invertebrates Branchinecta conservatio FE/--/-- Found in ephemeral wetland habitats and vernal pools Wet season: November No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Conservancy fairy shrimp that fill by winter and hold water until June on clay, to April (adults) species. volcanic, and alluvial soils within grassland communities from 5 to 145 meters. Dry season: May to October (cysts) Branchinecta lynchi FT /--/-- Found commonly in a small swale earth slump or Wet season: December No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Vernal pool fairy shrimp basalt-flow depression basin with grassy or muddy to May (adults) species. bottom in unplowed grassland from 10 to 290 meters in the Central Valley and up to 1,159 meters in the Dry season: June to South Coast Mountains Region. November (cysts) Callophrys mossii bayensis FE/--/-- Found in the fogbelt of steep north facing slopes that February-April No. The project site does not provide habitat for this San Bruno elfin butterfly receive little direct sunlight. Larval food plant is (mating flight) species. stonecrop (Sedum spathulifolium), which occurs on Wet Season mainly north-facing slopes at elevations from 61 to (larvae) 1,524 meters. Euphydryas editha bayensis FT/--/-- Found on shallow, serpentine-derived or similar soils. February-May No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Bay checkerspot butterfly Larval host plant is dwarf plantain (Plantago erecta). (mating flight) species. If dwarf plantain is unavailable, larvae may also use Wet Season purple owl’s clover (Castilleja densiflora or Castilleja (larvae) exserta). Lepidurus packardi FE/--/-- Found in a variety of natural and artificial, seasonally Wet season: November No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Vernal pool tadpole shrimp ponded habitat types including: vernal pools, swales, to April (adults) species. ephemeral drainages, stock ponds, reservoirs, ditches, backhoe pits, and ruts caused by vehicular activities. Dry season: May to Wetland habitats vary in size from 2 square meters to October (cysts) 356,253 square meters and vary in depth from 2 to 15 centimeters. 1 Regulatory Status (Federal/State/ Identification/ Special-Status Species Local/S) Habitat Requirements Survey Period Potential for Occurrence Amphibians Ambystoma californiense FT/CT/-- Ponded water required for breeding. Adults spend Drift fence studies Yes. The area surrounding the project site could provide California tiger salamander summer in small mammal burrows. during fall and winter upland habitat for this species, and the species could for upland habitats. enter the site through openings in the exclusion fencing Aquatic larval surveys installed for the reclamation project, if the fencing were from January-June not maintained. Rana boylii --/Candidate T, Found in shallow flowing streams with some cobble in March-June No. While Alameda Creek occurs in the vicinity of the Foothill yellow-legged frog CSC/ a variety of habitats including woodlands, riparian project site; this species is not known to occur outside of -- forest, coastal scrub, chaparral, and wet meadows from permanent water sources. Therefore, this species in 0 to 1,830 meters. Rarely encountered far from unlikely to utilize the project site as overland movement. permanent water sources. Rana draytonii FT/--/-- Typically found in or within 300 feet of aquatic Aquatic surveys of Yes. The area surrounding the project site could provide California red-legged frog habitat. Breed in quiet, slow moving streams, ponds, or breeding sites between upland habitat for this species, and the species could marsh communities with emergent vegetation or dense January and September. enter the site through openings in the exclusion fencing riparian vegetation. May disperse up to two miles Optimally after April installed for the reclamation project, if the fencing were between suitable aquatic habitat. 15. not maintained. Reptiles Anniella pulchra pulchra --/CSC/-- Found in sparsely vegetated areas of beach dunes, Dawn and dusk No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Silvery legless lizard chaparral, pine-oak woodlands, desert scrub, sandy species. washes, and stream terraces with sycamores, cottonwoods, or oaks. Lives mostly underground, burrowing in loose sandy soil. Sometimes found on the surface at dusk and at night. Emys marmorata --/CSC/-- Found in permanent ponds, lakes, streams, irrigation Year round Yes. The area surrounding the project site could provide Western pond turtle ditches, permanent pools, and along intermittent upland habitat for this species, and the species could streams. Requires aquatic habitats with suitable enter the site through openings in the exclusion fencing basking sites. Nest sites most often characterized as installed for the reclamation project, if the fencing were having gentle slopes less than 15 percent with little not maintained. vegetation or sandy banks. Found from 0 to 1,430 meters. Masticophis lateralis FT/CT/-- Found in canyons, rocky hillsides, chaparral, Year round Yes. The area surrounding the project site could provide euryxanthus scrublands, open woodlands, pond edges, and stream upland habitat for this species, and the species could Alameda whipsnake courses. enter the site through openings in the exclusion fencing installed for the reclamation project, if the fencing were not maintained. 2 Regulatory Status (Federal/State/ Identification/ Special-Status Species Local/S) Habitat Requirements Survey Period Potential for Occurrence Mammals Antrozous pallidus --/CSC/-- Found in grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and Year round No. The project site does not provide roosting habitat for Pallid bat forests from sea level up through mixed conifer forests this species. from 0 to 2,000 meters. The species is most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts also include cliffs, abandoned buildings, bird boxes, and under bridges. Corynorhinus townsendii --/CSC/-- Uses caves, buildings, and tree cavities for night Year round No. The project site does not provide roosting habitat for Townsend’s big-eared bat roosts. Maternity and hibernation colonies typically are this species. in caves and mine tunnels. Eumops perotis californicus --/CSC/-- Found in rugged, rocky areas where suitable crevices Year round No. The project site does not provide roosting habitat for Western mastiff bat are available for day-roosts. Characteristically, day- this species. roosts are located in large cracks in exfoliating slabs of granite or sandstone. Neotoma fuscipes annectens --/CSC/-- Found in riparian areas along streams and rivers. Year round Yes. Potential nests have been identified near the project San Francisco dusky-footed Requires areas with a mix of brush and trees. site boundaries.1 The species could enter the site through woodrat openings in the exclusion fencing installed for the reclamation project, if the fencing were not maintained. Taxidea taxus --/CSC/-- Found in the drier open stages of most shrub, forest, Year round No. The project site does not provide habitat for this American badger and herbaceous habitats with friable soils. Badgers are species. generally associated with treeless regions, prairies, parklands, and cold desert areas. Cultivated lands have been reported to provide little usable habitat for this species. Reithrodontomys raviventris FE/CE/-- Requires dense cover including pickleweed (Salicornia Year round No. The project site does not provide habitat for this virginica). Seldom found in cordgrass or alkali species. Salt marsh harvest mouse bulrush. Found in marshes with an upper zone of peripheral halophytes (salt-tolerant plants). Sorex vagrans halicoetes --/CSC/-- Found in marsh and swamp and wetland. Year round No. The project site does not provide habitat for this Salt-marsh wandering shrew species. Vulpes macrotis mutica FE/CT/-- Found in alkali sink, valley grassland, and foothill Year round No. While marginally suitable habitat occurs within the San Joaquin kit fox woodland. Hunts in areas with low sparse vegetation nonnative grassland given the lack of friable soils, no that allows good visibility and mobility. Pupping dens denning habitat occurs within the project site. are built in loosely textured soils from 110 to 900 meters. 3 Regulatory Status (Federal/State/ Identification/ Special-Status Species Local/S) Habitat Requirements Survey Period Potential for Occurrence Birds Agelaius tricolor --/CT/-- Nests in dense blackberry, cattail, tules, bulrushes,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Department of the Interior MAR 2 7 2019
    U,S. FISH & WILDLIFE S1:!;RVICE United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ' .' Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office �-,.111,'"!il'f; In Reply Refer to: 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-2605 0SESMF00- Sacramento, California 95825-1846 2018-F-3331-1 MAR 2 7 2019 Mr. Alessandro Amaglio RegionalEnvironmental Officer, Region IX Federal Emergency Management Agency 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 Oakland, California 94607 Subject: Programmatic Formal Section 7 Consultationon Federal Emergency Management Agency's Disaster, Mitigation, and Preparedness Programs within the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office'sJurisdiction, California Dear Mr. Amaglio: This letter is in response to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) request to initiate formalsection 7 consultationunder the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act), and provides the U.S. Fish and WildlifeServic e's (Service) programmatic biological opinion on FEMA's Disaster, Mitigation, and Preparedness Programs (proposed project) in Californiaas described in FEMA's June 20, 2018 Programmatic Biological Assessmentfor Disaster, Mitigation, and PreparednessPrograms in California (programmatic biological assessment). We received your June 20, 2018, letter requestinginitiation of consultation in our Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (SFWO) on June 20, 2018. On September 14, 2018, we received a letter fromFEMA changing effectsdeterminations for 20 species. At issue are the effects of FEMA's proposed action on 35 federally-listed species and their designated or proposed criticalhabitats which the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office has lead responsibility and seven federally-listed species and their critical habitat which occur within the jurisdiction of the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office but for which other Service field officeshave lead responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • An Addendum to the FY 2016/2017 Gravity Sewer Improvements Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), State Clearinghouse No
    June 12, 2019 ADDENDUM TO THE FY 2016/2017 GRAVITY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION INTRODUCTION This environmental document is an addendum to the FY 2016/2017 Gravity Sewer Improvements Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), State Clearinghouse No. 2017122069, by the Ross Valley Sanitary District (the District). Amendments to the Final IS/MND1 for the project include: 1) addressing a change of construction methods, and 2) fulfilling requirements for submittal of a State Revolving Fund (SRF) application. These changes and additions to the project have necessitated further environmental review. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the IS/MND continues to serve as the appropriate document addressing the environmental impacts of these improvements pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Background The IS/MND was prepared to address construction-level impacts to the existing deficient gravity sewer mains owned by the District in two areas: the Butterfield/Meadowcroft alignment (Butterfield alignment) and the Nokomis alignment (see Figures 2 and 3 in the IS/MND). The IS/MND evaluated potential environmental effects on aesthetics, agriculture and forestry, air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation,
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Butterfly Habitat Restorations
    Planning Butterfly Habitat Restorations Kim R. Mason Introduction Ecologists and entomologists in Britain and the United States have participated in numerous projects aimed at restoring, expanding, and mitigating losses of habitat for native butterflies. Some of these butterflies have been listed as threatened or endangered; others have been lost or are in decline in certain portions of their former ranges. The experiences and observations of these scientists illustrate potential needs and concerns when planning to restore or improve existing butterfly habitat. This paper will relate several cases in which complex biotic and abiotic interactions played important roles in the success or failure of butterfly habitat restoration and the reestablishment of butterfly populations. Although each butterfly species has its own unique combination of habitat requirements and life history, some fundamental principles concerning butterfly biology (New 1991) are significant in planning habitat restorations. Most caterpillars are herbivores, and many are specialists which feed on only one kind or a few related kinds of plants. Therefore, the presence of appropriate larval host plants is the primary requirement of habitat restoration. In addition, many butterfly species require that the larval food plant be in a particular growth stage, of a certain height, exposed to the proper amount of sunlight, or in close proximity to another resource. Adults typically utilize a wider range of plants or other resources as food, and flight gives them expanded mobility. However, adult dispersal ability varies from species to species. For some, physical features such as a few meters of open space, a stream, a hedge, or a change in gradient create intrinsic barriers to dispersal; other species routinely migrate long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California the Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database
    State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database STATE & FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED & THREATENED ANIMALS OF CALIFORNIA January 2010 This is a list of animals found within California or off the coast of the State that have been classified as Endangered or Threatened by the California Fish & Game Commission (state list) or by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior or the U.S. Secretary of Commerce (federal list). The official California listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 670.5. The official federal listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is published in the Federal Register, 50 CFR 17.11. The California Endangered Species Act of 1970 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Rare”. The California Endangered Species Act of 1984 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Threatened”. On January 1, 1985, all animal species designated as “Rare” were reclassified as “Threatened”. Animals that are candidates for state listing and animals proposed for federal listing are also included on this list. A state candidate species is one that the Fish and Game commission had formally noticed as being under review by the Department for addition to the State list. A federal proposed species is one for which a proposed regulation has been published in the Federal Register. Code Designation: Totals as of January 2010 SE = State-listed as Endangered 45 ST = State listed as Threatened 34 SR = State listed as Rare – old designation, all animals reclassified to Threatened on 1/1/85 0 FE = Federally listed as Endangered (21.5% of all U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • And Mission Blue Butterfly Populations Found at Milagra Ridge and the Mission Blue Butterfly Population at Marin Headlands Are Managed by the GGNRA
    San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Patrick Kobernus: Adult male mission blue butterfly. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento, California February 2010 5-YEAR REVIEW San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Grossberg
    Patrick Kobernus Principal EDUCATION M.S. Ecology California State University, East Bay TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & EXPERIENCE Patrick Kobernus is the owner of Coast Ridge Ecology, and has over 18 years of experience as a professional wildlife biologist. He currently manages a staff of six biologists and environmental specialists. He is experienced in supervising biological monitoring crews, conducting endangered species monitoring and rare plant mapping, and overseeing habitat management and restoration projects including invasive species control, grazing, controlled burning, and replanting projects. Since 2010, Mr. Kobernus has served as the Lead Biologist for the Crystal Springs /San Andreas Transmission System Upgrade Project, Crystal Springs Pipeline No. 2 Project, Lower Crystal Springs Dam Improvement Project, Harry Tracy Water Treatment Long Term Improvement Project and the SFPUC Bioregional Habitat Restoration Program. Mr. Kobernus conducted extensive surveys and consulted on mitigation efforts for California red-legged frog, San Francisco garter snake, western pond turtle, steelhead, San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat, nesting birds and roosting bats. Mr. Kobernus has extensive experience with rare animal and plant species in northern and central California, including San Bruno elfin butterfly, Callippe silverspot butterfly, Smith’s blue butterfly, Myrtle’s silverspot butterfly, California tiger salamander, northern spotted owl, burrowing owl, several local bat species, and several local serpentine endemic plant species. Mr. Kobernus served as the Habitat Manager for the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan in San Mateo County for 13 years (1995-2007). He has worked extensively within the San Francisco Bay Area, conducting biological assessments and USFWS protocol surveys for protected species within San Francisco, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Benito Counties, and electrofishing and trapping surveys for steelhead in San Mateo, Alameda, and Santa Clara Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXONOMY Plant Family Crassulaceae Species Scientific
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Sedum spathulifolium ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/SESP.pdf TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Crassulaceae Common Name Stonecrop Family Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Sedum spathulifolium Hook. Varieties Sedum spathulifolium Hook var. spathulifolium Sub-species Sedum spathufolium ssp. pruinosum Sedum spathufolium ssp. purdyi Sedum spathufolium ssp. spathulifolium Sedum spathulifoliym ssp. yosemitense Cultivar ‘Cape Blanco’ ‘Rubra’ Common Synonym(s) Sedum spathulifolium Hook ssp. spathulifolium Common Name(s) Broadleaf stonecrop, Pacific sedum Species Code (as per USDA SESP Plants database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range USDA – NRCS – NGCE, 2017 WTU Herbarium, Burke Museum, 2017 Ecological distribution Southern half of coastal and interior British Columbia to California. Common on Vancouver Island, Gulf Islands, San Juan Islands, and west of the Cascades in Washington. Also, found east through the Coast Ranges in Oregon and California, and in the Columbia River Gorge.6 Climate and elevation range Low to middle elevations; abundance decreases with increasing precipitation; found in dry, sunny areas5 Local habitat and abundance Dry coarse, sandy to gravelly, nitrogen-poor soils; coastal cliffs, rock outcroppings, and ravines2,5 Plant strategy type / Climax species on dry, non-forested sites5 successional stage Plant characteristics Perennial, succulent herb grows from a stout rhizome and rootstock; stems ascending to erect, numerous, branched above, 5-20 cm tall; glabrous and glausous.3 Leaves sage green to reddish in full sun;4 spatulate to oblong, overlapping, flattened but very succulent; stem leaves alternate, basal leaves in rosette.2 Inflorescence terminal, flat-topped, paniculate cymes; flower 5- parted, bright yellow; petals narrowly oblong-lanceolate 7-10 mm long, stamens 10, 5 attached to base of petals.2,3 Flowering time: June - July Fruit ripening time: July - August PROPAGATION DETAILS Ecotype No information found.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant in the Spotlight
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety March / April 2010 Beautiful, Durable Baptisias Coniferous Groundcovers DynamicDynamic DuetsDuets Agaves for Small Spaces forfor ShadeShade contents Volume 89, Number 2 . March / April 2010 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM AHS Allan Armitage to host AHS webinar, River Farm Spring Garden Market in April, AHS National Children & Youth Garden Symposium goes to California, AHS to participate in 4th annual Washington, D.C.-area Garden Fest, 2010 AHS President’s Council Members Trip to Florida. 14 AHS NEWS SPECIAL 2010 Great American Gardeners National Award winners and 2010 Book Award winners. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… page 36 Steven Still: Herbaceous perennial expert. 44 HOMEGROWN HARVEST A bumper crop of broccoli. 18 DYNAMIC DUETS FOR SHADE BY KRIS WETHERBEE Light up shady areas of the garden by using plant combinations 46 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK that offer complementary textures and colors. Mt. Cuba Center releases coneflower evaluation results, AMERICAN BEAUTIES: study shows bumble bee 24 page 24 populations declining, BAPTISIAS BY RICHARD HAWKE GreatPlants® and Perennial The release of new cultivars of Plant Association name 2010 false indigo has renewed garden- Plants of the Year, Berry ers’ interest in the genus Baptisia. Botanic Garden to close, Jane Pepper retires as president of page 46 GROUND-COVERING Pennsylvania Horticultural 30 Society. CONIFERS BY PENELOPE O’SULLIVAN 50 GREEN GARAGE® Reduce maintenance and add Garden gloves. vibrant color and texture to the garden by using low-growing 52 BOOK REVIEWS conifers as groundcovers. What’s Wrong with My Plant? (And How Do I Fix It?); Homegrown Vegetables, Fruits, and Herbs; The Vegetable Gardener’s Bible; and 36 AGAVES FOR SMALL GARDENS BY MARY IRISH The Encyclopedia of Herbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile for San Bruno Elfin, Callophrys Mossii Bayensis
    Black, S. H., and D. M. Vaughan. 2005. Species Profile: Callophrys mossii bayensis. In Shepherd, M. D., D. M. Vaughan, and S. H. Black (Eds). Red List of Pollinator Insects of North America. CD-ROM Version 1 (May 2005). Portland, OR: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. ________________________________________________________________________ Callophrys mossii bayensis (R. M. Brown), 1969 San Bruno Elfin (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini) Photo by Larry Orsak. Please contact the Xerces Society for permission to use. ________________________________________________________________________ Profile prepared by Scott Hoffman Black and Mace Vaughan The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The San Bruno Elfin inhabits rocky outcrops and cliffs in coastal scrub on the San Francisco peninsula. The San Bruno Elfin is restricted to a few small populations, the largest of which occurs on San Bruno Mountain. Its habitat has been diminished by quarrying, off-road recreation, and urban development. Development pressures on the San Francisco peninsula continue to grow, and the major threats to the butterfly— increased urbanization in the area, and loss of habitat by road construction and rock and sand quarrying—reflect this. Grazing may have encouraged the growth of exotic plants in the area. In the early 1980s, a habitat conservation plan was developed to allow development on San Bruno Mountain while minimizing the adverse effects on the San Bruno Elfin
    [Show full text]