Locomotive Fuel on the Boston and Providence Rail Road

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Locomotive Fuel on the Boston and Providence Rail Road Locomotive fuel on the Boston and Providence Rail Road Harry Chase 2012 1. Introduction The Boston and Providence Rail Road opened its 42-mile main line between the capital cities of Massachusetts and Rhode Island in 1835. The railroad operated as an independent corporation until 1888, when it was leased by the Old Colony Railroad. During its 53-year history the Boston and Providence burned first wood and then bituminous (“soft”) coal in its approximately 124 steam locomotives and experimented with coke, anthracite (“hard”) coal and oil. This monograph contains a brief account of each of the fuels used in the railroad’s locomotives during its corporate history and the rationale for converting from one fuel to another. 2. Wood In Europe, wood had been tried for its cheapness as locomotive fuel but was given up in favor of coal and coke largely because of the greater availability of fossil fuel, and also because of the annoying and even dangerous sparks that issued from the smokestacks of wood-burning engines. In the United States, wood was much more easily available and generally cheaper than other fuels, and for many years was commonly burned in locomotives; while sparks were less of a problem in the thinly settled countryside through which American railroads ran. Ingenious spark-catching devices were invented, including the popular “diamond stack” devised by Boston and Providence master mechanic George S. Griggs. [1] Spark arresters were not always effective. British travelers, who at home were accustomed to engines that burned fossil fuel, were entranced by the sparks thrown by American wood-burners. Charles Dickens, on a visit to the United States in 1842, rode the Boston and Lowell Railroad and wrote of the “mad dragon of an engine with its train of cars; scattering in all directions a shower of burning sparks from its wood fire,” and later in the day on the same railroad, “I found entertainment for the rest of the ride in watching the effects of the wood fire, which had been invisible in the morning, but were now brought out in full relief by the darkness, for we were travelling in a whirlwind of bright sparks, which showered around us like a storm of fiery snow.” [2] The geologist Charles Lyell, riding a North Carolina train after dark in January 1842, describes a wood-burning engine as “resembling a large rocket fired horizontally, with a brilliant stream of revolving sparks extending behind the engine for several hundred yards, each spark being a minute particle of wood, which, after issuing from the chimney of the furnace, remains ignited for several seconds in the air. Now and then these fiery particles, which are invisible by day, instead of lagging in the rear, find entrance by favour of the wind through the open windows of the car, and, while some burn holes in the traveller's cloak, others make their way into his eyes, causing them to smart most painfully.” [3] These sparks sometimes set serious fires, as when on 13 April 1836 a Boston and Providence engine set its own baggage car ablaze, destroying the newspaper mail for New York City and half the baggage, [4] and an instance on 29 October 1836 when a mile-long swath of woods in Mansfield, Mass., was ignited by a Boston and Providence locomotive. [5] The Boston and Providence Rail Road’s first steam locomotive was Whistler, built by Robert Stephenson in England in 1832 [6] for another New England railway and sold by that company to the Providence road in 1833. Its mechanical specifications conform to published descriptions of Stephenson's prototype Planet, completed for the Liverpool and Manchester Railway in 1830. The Planet type was designed to burn coke, [7] but I’ve seen no evidence that reveals whether Whistler in the beginning burned coal, coke or wood. At first I assumed the former, as Boston and Providence is reported to have purchased three anthracite-burning engines in the 1830s, [8] but a record of steaming tests conducted in 1835 indicates that Whistler then used pine wood for fuel. [9] At first, the dry pitch pine burned in Boston and Providence locomotives was purchased at $6.00 a cord plus $1.00 a cord for sawing and splitting. The engine Boston, built in 1835 by Edward Bury in England [10] and equipped with Bury’s dome-shaped “haystack” firebox, in making a run between Boston and Providence burned 1-1/8 cords of wood. [11] Pitch pine (Pinus rigida), though it burns hot and has been used for fuel, seems unsuitable as the resin would coat the tubes with creosote, reducing heating capacity. Perhaps, however, the fires were maintained at a high enough heat that the creosote was continually burned off. Though pitch pine grew locally but not abundantly along the line of the Boston and Providence, and is common on Cape Cod and in sandy soils farther inland, most of it was brought by schooner from the South. [12] During 1837, each of the 11 locomotives in service typically made one round trip per day between Boston and Providence, totaling 84 miles. On the average an engine burned a cord of wood on each 42-mile leg, sufficient to turn 700 gallons of water to steam. [13] By 1838 the locomotives were burning spruce. Spruce was not found locally in any quantity and had to be shipped from Canada, northern and western New England, and the South. Wood fuel remained a significant expense. The railroad's 10 engines, in running a total of 119,574 miles, consumed 3200 cords costing $18,618, an average of $5.82 per cord, including 75 cents for sawing it into suitable lengths. The locomotives averaged 37-1/3 miles on a cord at a cost of 15.9 cents per mile. [14] Another report states that Boston and Providence engines in 1838 got 36 miles on a cord of wood for 16 cents per mile. [15] Stops on route for wood and water were necessary, and Mansfield, 24 miles from Boston and 18 miles from Providence and (beginning in 1836) the junction of the Taunton Branch Rail Road, was the principal place where engines were given a drink and refueled from a large wood yard situated beside the track At the Roxbury shop of master mechanic George Griggs, 2 miles from Boston, locomotive tenders were filled from a water tank at the shed, then the engines were run up a spur track to the woodhouse, where a circular saw driven by a horse walking on a treadmill cut the cordwood to a length that fit in the tenders (on most railroads this was 16 to 24 inches). [16] The European railroad expert Gerstner, who visited in 1839, makes no mention of coaling facilities for the one anthracite-burning locomotive supposedly still on the roster, therefore it must be assumed that the engine had been redrafted to burn wood or had been retired from service. In 1844, 15-year-old Frederick Paine went to work for Boston and Providence at Mansfield sawing cordwood into stove lengths for heating the passenger station. He was paid 25 and 50 cents a cord. [17] In a few more years, the enterprising Paine went into the business of buying wood, hiring sawyers to cut it into lengths to fit the locomotive fireboxes and selling it to the railroad company. Some Mansfield farmers hauled their own wood, cut in standard cordwood lengths of 4 feet, to the station’s wood pile. A three-man crew worked on the pile sawing the sticks in half, one cut per stick, at 60 cents a cord. While the trains paused for water, the men tossed the billets of wood into the tenders. Not until later did the railroad company, to save money by cutting out Paine and other local middle men, manage their own fuel transactions and wood yards. [18] The problem, however, was that in New England wood was used in enormous quantities for home heating, building (including ship building at New Bedford and other seaports) and many other purposes. For miles around major cities the landscape was laid bare, and what cordwood that was cut elsewhere had escalated in price. The days when farmers along the railroad line could add to their incomes by supplying large quantities of wood for stacking beside way stations like Mansfield had all but disappeared as southeastern New England became increasingly denuded, [19] and a greater quantity of wood had to be imported from the South. A.M. Levitt, in 2002, acquired a large number of Boston and Providence invoices dating from 1846. Many of the September and October invoices are "peppered" with charges for cordwood, much of which came by ships apparently belonging to the railroad from company- owned woodlands in Virginia; although no cordwood invoices were printed during the third quarter of 1846. Both pitch pine and white pine (Pinus strobus) are mentioned. The wood was received on the schooners Achsah Parker, Jeroleman (113 cords at $6.00 per cord), Pokomoke (70 cords also at $6.00) and Sarah Francis and the sloop Eunice. The Sarah Francis is represented by two trips, having been unloaded on 14 September (28 cords) and 7 October; her loads were billed at $5.20 per cord, as was the wood from the Eunice. The Achsah Parker was unloaded 21 September (28 cords), 13 October (30 cords) and 22 October (29 cords), these loads also billed at $5.20 per cord. The two different prices suggest two separate sources in Virginia some distance apart by land or sea or both.
Recommended publications
  • The Carrying Trade and the First Railways in England, C1750-C1850
    The Carrying Trade and the First Railways in England, c1750-c1850 Carolyn Dougherty PhD University of York Railway Studies November 2018 Abstract Transport and economic historians generally consider the change from moving goods principally on roads, inland waterways and coastal ships to moving them principally on railways as inevitable, unproblematic, and the result of technological improvements. While the benefits of rail travel were so clear that most other modes of passenger transport disappeared once rail service was introduced, railway goods transport did not offer as obvious an improvement over the existing goods transport network, known as the carrying trade. Initially most railways were open to the carrying trade, but by the 1840s railway companies began to provide goods carriage and exclude carriers from their lines. The resulting conflict over how, and by whom, goods would be transported on railways, known as the carrying question, lasted more than a decade, and railway companies did not come to dominate domestic goods carriage until the 1850s. In this study I develop a fuller picture of the carrying trade than currently exists, highlighting its multimodal collaborative structure and setting it within the ‘sociable economy’ of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century England. I contrast this economy with the business model of joint-stock companies, including railway companies, and investigate responses to the business practices of these companies. I analyse the debate over railway company goods carriage, and identify changes in goods transport resulting from its introduction. Finally, I describe the development and outcome of the carrying question, showing that railway companies faced resistance to their attempts to control goods carriage on rail lines not only from the carrying trade but also from customers of goods transport, the government and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • General Notice Letter (Gnl) Response
    RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP COUNSELLORS AT LAW 50 ROWES WHARF • BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3319 TELEPHONE: (6i7)330-7000 • FACSIMILE: (617)4-39-9556 • EMAIL: [email protected] Margaret Van Deusen Direct Dial: (617) 330-7154 E-mail: [email protected] June 26, 2000 BY MESSENGER Richard Haworth United States Environmental Protection Agency Site Evaluation and Response Section II 1 Congress Street Suite 1100 Mail Code HBR Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023 Re: EPA Notice Letter, Old Colony Railroad Site, East Bridgewater, MA Dear Mr. Haworth: This firm is counsel to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority ("MBTA") with respect to the above matter. By letter dated June 5, 2000, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") notified the MBTA of its potential liability regarding the Old Colony Railroad Site in East Bridgewater, MA ("Site") pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). The letter also informed the MBTA that EPA plans to conduct immediate removal activities involving installation of a perimeter fence, elimination of direct contact with contaminated soils and prevention of off-site migration via soil transport. EPA is asking the MBTA to perform or to finance these activities. Pursuant to conversations with Marcia Lamel, Senior Enforcement Counsel, EPA, the MBTA was given until today to respond to EPA's letter. As discussed below, even though the MBTA does not believe that it is a responsible party at this Site, it is willing to participate in fencing the perimeter of the Site and posting signage. The MBTA is also willing to discuss with EPA covering "hot spots" of contaminated soil on the Site with some sort of synthetic cover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Steam Locomotive, 1803 to 1898 (1899)
    > g s J> ° "^ Q as : F7 lA-dh-**^) THE EVOLUTION OF THE STEAM LOCOMOTIVE (1803 to 1898.) BY Q. A. SEKON, Editor of the "Railway Magazine" and "Hallway Year Book, Author of "A History of the Great Western Railway," *•., 4*. SECOND EDITION (Enlarged). £on&on THE RAILWAY PUBLISHING CO., Ltd., 79 and 80, Temple Chambers, Temple Avenue, E.C. 1899. T3 in PKEFACE TO SECOND EDITION. When, ten days ago, the first copy of the " Evolution of the Steam Locomotive" was ready for sale, I did not expect to be called upon to write a preface for a new edition before 240 hours had expired. The author cannot but be gratified to know that the whole of the extremely large first edition was exhausted practically upon publication, and since many would-be readers are still unsupplied, the demand for another edition is pressing. Under these circumstances but slight modifications have been made in the original text, although additional particulars and illustrations have been inserted in the new edition. The new matter relates to the locomotives of the North Staffordshire, London., Tilbury, and Southend, Great Western, and London and North Western Railways. I sincerely thank the many correspondents who, in the few days that have elapsed since the publication: of the "Evolution of the , Steam Locomotive," have so readily assured me of - their hearty appreciation of the book. rj .;! G. A. SEKON. -! January, 1899. PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION. In connection with the marvellous growth of our railway system there is nothing of so paramount importance and interest as the evolution of the locomotive steam engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsborough Hall & Hillsborough Park
    HILLSBOROUGH HALL & HILLSBOROUGH PARK The Steades Thomas Steade was the builder of Hillsborough Hall. He was the son of Nicholas Steade and Anne Micklethwaite and was born on 16 March 1728 at Ecclesfield. He married Millicent (Meliscent) Pegge, who was the daughter of Strelley Pegge of Beauchief and Mary Broughton from Lowdham, on 30 April 1768. He was a magistrate and he died in 1793. Hillsborough House was built in 1779 as a dwelling for Thomas and his wife Meliscent who had been living in nearby Burrowlee House, which is situated just 250 metres to the east. The Steades were a family of local of landowners whose history went back to the 14th century. At the time of construction the house stood in rural countryside well outside the Sheffield boundary. Steade named his new residence in honour of Wills Hill who at the time was known as the Earl of Hillsborough (later Lord Downside of Hillsborough, County Down), an eminent politician of the period and a patron of the Steades. Steade acquired more land and the grounds eventually had an area of 103 acres (0.42 km2). They were much more extensive than the present Hillsborough Park, stretching north to the current junction of Leppings Lane and Penistone Road and included the site on which Hillsborough Stadium now stands. It extended further south encompassing the site now occupied by the Hillsborough arena. The grounds had areas given over to agriculture but there was also extensive parkland featuring a lake, two lodges and a tree lined avenue. There was also a walled garden, which still exists today, which provided fresh produce for the house’s kitchens.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Concord, MA
    Technical Memorandum Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Concord, MA Cultural Resources Survey January 10, 2008 Submitted to: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 530 Broadway Providence, Rhode Island 02909 Introduction The Town of Concord, Massachusetts has contracted with Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) for professional design and engineering services for a non-motorized multi-use recreational path/rail trail over the 3.5 mile section of the proposed Bruce Freeman Rail Trail from the southerly side of Route 2 south to the Sudbury town line (Figure 1). The design and engineering services include a survey and documentation of the historic resources along the proposed trail alignment. PAL entered into a Subconsultant Contract with VHB for the historic resources survey and documentation. The survey’s purpose is to identify historic railroad-related resources along the rail corridor, to document these resources in writing and with photographs, and to provide recommendations for incorporating existing railroad infrastructure in and creating educational opportunities along the rail corridor. This technical memorandum describes the field and research methodologies employed by PAL in conducting fieldwork and archival research, presents the results of the field survey, and provides recommendations for the integration of railroad-related resources into the landscape design and interpretive programming elements of the finished rail trail. Methodology PAL employees John Daly (industrial historian) and Quinn Stuart (architectural assistant) completed a site walk of the 3.5-mile proposed rail trail corridor on August 23, 2007. Prior to the site walk, PAL employees met representatives of the Town of Concord to discuss priorities for the survey. Valarie Kinkade of the Concord Historical Commission, Ashley Galvin of the Concord Historic District Commission, and Henry T.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearce Higgins, Selwyn Archive List
    NATIONAL RAILWAY MUSEUM INVENTORY NUMBER 1997-7923 SELWYN PEARCE HIGGINS ARCHIVE CONTENTS PERSONAL PAPERS 3 RAILWAY NOTES AND DIARIES 4 Main Series 4 Rough Notes 7 RESEARCH AND WORKING PAPERS 11 Research Papers 11 Working Papers 13 SOCIETIES AND PRESERVATION 16 Clubs and Societies 16 RAILWAY AND TRAMWAY PAPERS 23 Light Railways and Tramways 23 Railway Companies 24 British Railways PSH/5/2/ 24 Cheshire Lines Railway PSH/5/3/ 24 Furness Railway PSH/5/4/ 25 Great Northern Railway PSH/5/7/ 25 Great Western Railway PSH/5/8/ 25 Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway PSH/5/9/ 26 London Midland and Scottish Railway PSH/5/10/ 26 London & North Eastern Railway PSH/5/11/ 27 London & North Western Railway PSH/5/12/ 27 London and South Western Railway PSH/5/13/ 28 Midland Railway PSH/5/14/ 28 Midland & Great Northern Joint Railway PSH/5/15/ 28 Midland and South Western Junction Railway PSH/5/16 28 North Eastern Railway PSH/5/17 29 North London Railway PSH/5/18 29 North Staffordshire Railway PSH/5/19 29 Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway PSH/5/20 29 Stratford-upon-Avon and Midland Junction Railway PSH/5/21 30 Railway and General Papers 30 EARLY LOCOMOTIVES AND LOCOMOTIVES BUILDING 51 Locomotives 51 Locomotive Builders 52 Individual firms 54 Rolling Stock Builders 67 SIGNALLING AND PERMANENT WAY 68 MISCELLANEOUS NOTEBOOKS AND PAPERS 69 Notebooks 69 Papers, Files and Volumes 85 CORRESPONDENCE 87 PAPERS OF J F BRUTON, J H WALKER AND W H WRIGHT 93 EPHEMERA 96 MAPS AND PLANS 114 POSTCARDS 118 POSTERS AND NOTICES 120 TIMETABLES 123 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 134 INDEX 137 Original catalogue prepared by Richard Durack, Curator Archive Collections, National Railway Museum 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Invests$'Jlom Into Restoring Railroadservice
    Paga46 • August2015 26, • www.oonotructlonoquipmenlgUlcle.com • CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMEriTGUIIE � Invests$'JlOM Into Restoring Railroad Service ByJay Adams problems. While the Commonwealth of CEO CORRESPONDENT Cardi Corp. crews work 011 rat/over Massachusetts provided an emergency sub­ PresidentAve1n1e tn FaU Rive,: sidy to continue service to tl1e Soud1 Coast in A long-dead mode of transportation is 1958, it was not enough. Passenger service coming back to life in several cities in on the Old Colony line was abandooed in Massachusetts.. 1959, with the exception of the main line Months of summer work have begun to between Boston and Providence,R.l. repair vital rail bridgesin the FallRiver area, The currentone-year phase of lhe project partof the 120-month South Coast Rail proj­ is seeingrailways shoredup forthe firsttime ect d1at is restoring52 mi. (83.6 km)of com­ in 56 years. muter rail service between Boston and lhe With the first year design phase complete. Massachusetts South Coast. The entirecost involving state discussions with communi­ of die decade-long plan is estimated to be tiesfrom Stoughton to FallRiver. tons of soil $2l0million. samples are being taken over many months "We are thrilled about the three Fall River to discerntoxic conte111 and other vital infor­ bridges and the Warnsutta Bridge in New mation. When the design phase is complete Bedford. These are solid investments that and the samples in hand, MassDOT will will provide immediate benefit to the begin replacing four bridges - New expanding freightrail sector. along the same Bedford's Wan�utta Bridge. Fall River's route as lhe future South Coast Rail com­ Golf Club Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The Descendants of John Pease 1
    The Descendants of John Pease 1 John Pease John married someone. He had three children: Edward, Richard and John. Edward Pease, son of John Pease, was born in 1515. Basic notes: He lived at Great Stambridge, Essex. From the records of Great Stambridge. 1494/5 Essex Record office, Biography Pease. The Pease Family, Essex, York, Durham, 10 Henry VII - 35 Victoria. 1872. Joseph Forbe and Charles Pease. John Pease. Defendant in a plea touching lands in the County of Essex 10 Henry VII, 1494/5. Issue:- Edward Pease of Fishlake, Yorkshire. Richard Pease of Mash, Stanbridge Essex. John Pease married Juliana, seized of divers lands etc. Essex. Temp Henry VIII & Elizabeth. He lived at Fishlake, Yorkshire. Edward married someone. He had six children: William, Thomas, Richard, Robert, George and Arthur. William Pease was born in 1530 in Fishlake, Yorkshire and died on 10 Mar 1597 in Fishlake, Yorkshire. William married Margaret in 1561. Margaret was buried on 25 Oct 1565 in Fishlake, Yorkshire. They had two children: Sibilla and William. Sibilla Pease was born on 4 Sep 1562 in Fishlake, Yorkshire. Basic notes: She was baptised on 12 Oct 1562. Sibilla married Edward Eccles. William Pease was buried on 25 Apr 1586. Basic notes: He was baptised on 29 May 1565. William next married Alicia Clyff on 25 Nov 1565 in Fishlake, Yorkshire. Alicia was buried on 19 May 1601. They had one daughter: Maria. Maria Pease Thomas Pease Richard Pease Richard married Elizabeth Pearson. Robert Pease George Pease George married Susanna ?. They had six children: Robert, Nicholas, Elizabeth, Alicia, Francis and Thomas.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor New York to Philadelphia
    Northeast Corridor New York to Philadelphia 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................2 2 A HISTORY..............................................................................................3 3 ROLLING STOCK......................................................................................4 3.1 EMD AEM-7 Electric Locomotive .......................................................................................4 3.2 Amtrak Amfleet Coaches .................................................................................................5 4 SCENARIOS.............................................................................................6 4.1 Go Newark....................................................................................................................6 4.2 New Jersey Trenton .......................................................................................................6 4.3 Spirit or Transportation ..................................................................................................6 4.4 The Big Apple................................................................................................................6 4.5 Early Clocker.................................................................................................................7 4.6 Evening Clocker.............................................................................................................7 4.7 Northeast Regional ........................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Metal for LOCOMOTIVE WEARING PARTS
    AUGUST, 1909 .~;, Railroad - Dep~rtm(n-l ,. .: ~:- .· , . y. JV\. (. A. , .. BUILDERS' HARDWARE ABSOLUTELY EUROPEAN FIREF;tOOF TH£ PLAN ~o't'EL Ess~~ For every need and of the highest BOSTON quality in every class New Britain, Conn. DIRECTLY OPPOSITE THE SOUTH STATION CONVENIENT TO BUSINESSCENTii:RB AND RUBLIC INSTITUTIONS ACCOMMODATIONS, CATERING AND OUR HOME DOOR CHECK SERVICE UNSURPASSED is the only appliance of its kind that with­ WRITE FOR BOOKLET. stands the hard use of railway service. 1-- ~ - ' . PINT~Cn LltiHT (LfCTRIC LltiHT Car Lighting by the PINT~cn Axle Driven Dqnomo~y~tem ~ \'~ Tf)1 with perfected -;iO­ of electric lighting. l:quip­ gle mantle lamp~. ment~ either ~old or oper­ Co~t-Ooe cent per hour. ated under contract. , ~T(A~ HfAT Car Heating by controllable direct steam and water circulating systems, steam tight couplers, traps, train pipe valves and other appliances. Thermo- Jet System where pressure is not desired. , SAF.ETY CAR HEATING & LIGHTING COMPANY,.. 2 RECTOR STREET, NEW YORK ,- Chicago Philadelphia St. Louis Boston Berkeley, Cal. Atlanta Montreal I T - ' 1Rew lJlorlit 1Rew lba"en anb lbartforb 1Railroab 1Rews. VoL. XII NEW HAVEN, CONN., AUGUST, 1909 No. 10 Train Service To_ The Boats. Brockton) anrl :\liddleboro to the "new road" (just completed under title of Dighton & "Old Colony Passenger Station. Fall River Line to New York" was the way the big signs Somerset) through Randolph and Taunton. used to read which hung for years on either The following in regard to the steamboat train over the "new road" and a description side of the Old Colony Depot at the corner of the towns through which it passed is taken of South and Kneeland streets in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • 50UTHAM Director of the Midland Counties Railway
    8- Edward Bury & Co. Lark for the London & Southampton Railway. This drawing first appeared in 7lhe Locomof/.ve Magazine and Railway Carriage and Wagon Review, Vol.8, locomotive building market. It planned to build pl 20,14th February 1903, and has been reproduced many times since. The accompanying text states "The first engine three locomotives of a 2-2-2 `Stephenson' type, shown on the Company's books was a small one built by E. speculatingitcouldsellthemontheopenmarket. Bury & Co. in 1835, numbered 24 on the makers' list, and The letter books indicate they took a long while named the 'Lark'." It was a four-wheeled passenger engine to be disposed of and in the meantime the firm with single driving wheels 5ft 6in diameter and a small had the opportunity to build locomotives for leading pair 3ft 6in diameter." It is not Lack as that had 4ft specific companies. The first order was for three diameter leading wheels. (Author's Collection) enginesfortheLondon&SouthamptonRailway a,&SR, soon to become the London & South Western Railway, I.SWR). Many of the shares of the L&SR had been taken up by people living in the Manchester and Liverpool areas and in Angust 1834 at the Royal Hotel in Manchester they formed a committee to represent their interests, with Thomas Cooke as chairman.7 Initially they were agreeable to the financesofthecompanyandtheworkofFrancis Giles (the L&SR engineers). By December 1836, however, the Iidncashire proprietors were very concerned with the slow progress and Giles's methods of wondng and Thomas Cooke, Robert Garnett[° and William Hill came down to meet the directors from London & Southampton and survey the line.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation in Bridgewater, 1900-1910 Benjamin A
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bridgewater, Massachusetts: A oT wn in Transition Local History 2009 Transportation in Bridgewater, 1900-1910 Benjamin A. Spence Recommended Citation Spence, Benjamin A. (2009). Transportation in Bridgewater, 1900-1910. In Bridgewater, Massachusetts: A oT wn in Transition. Monograph 2. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/spence/2 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Bridgewater, Massachusetts A Town in Transition Transportation 1900-1910 (Including Extensive Historical Background) Dr. Benjamin A. Spence © 2009 An Explanation For several years I have had the pleasure of delving into the history of Bridgewater, Massachusetts, concentrating on the first quarter of the twentieth century and providing, when appropriate, historical background to make my discussions clearer. Although my research and writing are ongoing, I have decided to make available drafts of a number of topics which I have explored at length, with the hope that the material presented will prove helpful to many readers. I would request that credit be given if my findings are used by other writers or those making oral presentations. As my study has proceeded, many people have been helpful and, hopefully, I will be able to thank all of them during the course of my writing. At this point, let me mention just a few who have been especially supportive. Many thanks to the Trustees of Bridgewater’s Public Library for allowing me free access to the sources in the town’s library, made easier by the aid given to me by the research librarians under the competent direction of Mary O’Connell.
    [Show full text]