DOCSLIB.ORG

Power Generating Facilities : Nuclear Power

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Power Generating Facilities : Nuclear Power Power Generating Facilities : Nuclear Power Targets a well-balanced nuclear power generation among various energy sources, taking into account energy security, cost and environmental concerns. Nuclear Power Stations (as of Mar. 31, 2016) Genkai NPS Maximum output Operation Station Unit commenceme Type (MW) nt year #2 559 1981 PWR Genkai #3 1,180 1994 PWR #4 1,180 1997 PWR #1 890 1984 PWR Sendai #2 890 1985 PWR Maximum output : Total 4,699MW Sendai NPS Genkai Nuclear Power Station Sendai Nuclear Power Station Power Generating Facilities : Thermal Power Pursues an optimal use of diverse energy sources by shifting high dependency on oil onto combined use of natural gas and coal, by applying high-tech power generating technologies including PFBC and combined-cycle system. Thermal Power Stations (as of Mar. 31, 2016) Operation Maximum output Station commencement Main fuel (MW) year Shin 1,800 1978 LNG Kokura (600×3) Karita 735 1972 Oil/Coal (375×1) (360×1) Buzen 1,000 1977 Oil (500×2) Shin Oita Thermel Power Station Matsuura 700 1989 Coal Shin Oita 2,295 1991 LNG (115×6) (217.5×4) (245×3) Ainoura 875 1973 Oil (375×1) (500×1) Reihoku 1,400 1995 Coal (700×2) Sendai 1,000 1974 Oil (500×2) Maximum output : Total 9,805MW Reihoku Thermal Power Station Power Generating Facilities : Hydro Power 143 hydro-power stations are currently in operation, thus accumulating veteran operation experience in construction and maintenance in various forms of hydro-power, from 50kW mini-hydro to 180MW reservoir type and 1,200MW pumped storage. ～ Major Hydro Power Stations (50MW ) (as of Mar. 31, 2016) Operation Maximum output Station commencement System (MW) year Omarugawa 1,200 2007 Pumped storage Tenzan 600 1986 Pumped storage Ohira 500 1975 Pumped storage Hitotsuse 180 1963 Reservoir Kamishiiba 93.2 1955 Reservoir Hitotsuse Hydroelectric Power Station Oyodogawa No.2 71.3 1932 Reservoir Yanagimata 63.8 1973 Reservoir Tsukabaru 63.1 1938 Reservoir Oyodogawa No.1 55.5 1926 Reservoir Iwayado 51.1 1942 Reservoir Matsubara 50.6 1971 Reservoir Morozuka 50 1961 Reservoir Maximum output : Total 3,584MW (Total 143 Hydro power stations) Omarugawa Hydroelectric Power Station Geothermal Power KEPCO is making proactive use of Kyushu’s abundant , valuable geothermal resources, with an installed capacity that accounts for more than 40%of the total for japan. KEPCO’s Hatchoubaru Power Plant (112,000kW) is the largest geothermal power plant in Japan. Geothermal power generation Kyushu EPCO geothermal power plants installed capacity (FY2012) Installed Start of Power plant capacity Location Kyushu EPCO accounts operation for more than 40% (kW) Takigami 27,500 Nov 1996 Hatchoubaru 110,000 Jun 1977 Kokonoe-machi, Hatchoubaru Other electric 2,000 Apr 2006 Kusu-gun, Oita Prefecture Kyushu Binary* power utilities EPCO in Japan Otake 12,500 Aug 1967 44% Makizono-cho, Kirishima Ogiri 30,000 Mar 1996 56% (212,000kW) City, Kagoshima Prefecture (267,000kW) Yamagawa, Ibusuki City, Yamagawa 25,960 Mar 1995 Kagoshima Prefecture Total 207,960 *Binary power generation is a power generation method in which geothermal fluid Source: Based on Agency for Natural Resources and (steam, hot water) is used as a heat source to heat/vaporize a low-boiling-point Energy “Power Survey Statistics” medium, that is then used to drive a turbine. Geothermal Power Hatchoubaru Geothermal PS Kyushu Otake PS Takigami PS Hatchoubaru PS Ogiri PS Yamagawa PS Binary Unit Unit No. 1 No. 2 Binary Output (MW) 55.0 55.0 2.0 Start of operation 1977 1990 2006 Power Generating Facilities : Internal Combustion Power There are many remote islands in the Kyushu region, with more than 60% of remote-island power generation installed capacity for the whole of Japan (excl. Okinawa) being accounted for by Kyushu EPCO facilities. Kyushu EPCO accounts for more than 60% of installed capacity on remote islands in Japan (excl. Okinawa). *Nearly 50% incl. Okinawa Other electric power utilities 38% Kyushu (193.000kW) EPCO 62% (315.000kW) (Output 10,000kW or more) (Output less than 10,000kW) 40 power stations on remote-island in Kyushu region Overview of Renewable Energy Power Station Fukuoka Clean Energy ★ Otake PS (12.5MW) (29.2MW) ★ Washiodake Wind PS Takigami PS (27.5MW) (12MW) Sasebo Photovoltaic PS ★ Hatchoubaru PS (110MW) (10MW) Hatchoubaru Binary (2MW) Omura Photovoltaic PS ★ (13.5MW) Miyazaki Biomass Recycle PS★ Omuta Photovoltaic PS (11.35MW) (3MW) Nagashima Wind PS★ Ogiri PS (30MW) (50.4 MW) Koshiki-jima Wind PS Yamagawa PS (30MW) (0.25MW) Photovoltaic Cape Noma Wind PS (large-scale) (3MW) Wind Amami Oshima Wind PS ★ Geothermal (1.99MW) Biomass ★：Development by group companies PV (Photovoltaic) Power Our Group companies are promoting Megasolar developments that make use of land previously used for our power stations. There are three power stations (3,000kW～）: Omuta , Omura and Sasebo. (all stations are located at former site of Power Station) Sasebo PS Omuta PS ～ ～ 10,000kW (2014 ) 3,000kW(2010 ) [Omura Megasolar Power Plant] 1st power generating plant Kyushu (3,000 kW) Omura PS 13,500kW (2013～) 2nd power generating plant (10,500 kW) Wind Power We are promoting wind power development in cooperation with group companies. Installed capacity Start of Power station (kW) operation 250 Koshiki-jima 1990～ <250×1 unit> Cape Noma 3,000 - 1,500 1998～ (#1,2) (#1～#5) <300×5 units> 1999～(#3,4,5) 1,500 (#6～#10) 2003～ <300×5 units> Nagashima Wind Power Station (50,400kW) 50,400 Nagashima★ 2008～ <2,400×21 units> 1,990 Amami Oshima★ 2009～ <1,990×1unit> 12,000 Washiodake★ 2011～ <2,000×6 units> ★：Development by group companies Cape Noma Wind Power Station (3,000kW) Biomass Power Miyazaki Biomass Recycle PS Kyushu Miyazaki Biomass Recycle PS Output 11,350kW Fuel Broiler chicken litter Fuel consumption 440 t/day Start of operation May 2005 LNG Terminal Facilities Tobata Terminal LNG Tank Tobata ✓ Operator : Kitakyushu LNG №５ Hibiki Oita ✓ Foundation : Feb. 1974 №３ №６ １ ✓ № №７ CoD : Sep.1977 №４ １ ✓ ２ №２ №８ Shareholder : ３ ４ 75% Kyushu Electric Power company ５ 25% Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Loading arm ✓ LNG Tank: 480,000 kl ✓ Gasification capacity：880t/h LNG Vaporizer ✓ LNG volume : 2.1Mt（FY2016） ✓ Off-taker : Kyushu Electric Power company, Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation and Others Oita Terminal LNG tank LNG ✓ Operator : Oita LNG vaporizer ✓ Foundation : July 1986 Oita Terminal ✓ CoD : Oct.1990 No.3 No.1 ✓ Shareholder : 98% Kyushu Electric Power company 2% Oita Gas No.5 No.4 No.2 ✓ LNG Tank: 460,000 kl ✓ Gasification capacity：665t/h ✓ LNG volume : 2.6Mt（FY2016） ✓Off-taker : Kyushu Electric Power company, Oita Gas and Others ✓ Additional Capacity Expansion of Gasification system: 95t/h was installed in 2015 LNG Terminal Facilities Hibiki Terminal ✓ Operator : Hibiki LNG ✓ Foundation : April 2010 Hibiki Terminal ✓ CoD : Nov. 2014 ✓ Shareholder : Tanker Vaporizer LNG Tank 90% Saibu Gas 10% Kyushu Electric Power company ✓ LNG Tank: 360,000 kl LPG Berth ： ✓ Gasification capacity 265t/h LNG Berth ✓ LNG volume : 0.6Mt (FY2016) ✓ Off-taker : Saibu Gas Caloric Adjustment Control Center LPG Tank Service LNG Lorry Building Loading Facility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electrical Modeling of a Thermal Power Station
    Electrical Modeling of a Thermal Power Station Reinhard Kaisinger Degree project in Electric Power Systems Second Level Stockholm, Sweden 2011 XR-EE-ES 2011:010 ELECTRICAL MODELING OF A THERMAL POWER STATION Reinhard Kaisinger Masters’ Degree Project Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden 2011 XR-EE-ES 2011:010 Table of Contents Page ABSTRACT V SAMMANFATTNING VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENT VII ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT VIII 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BACKGROUND 3 2.1 Facilities in a Thermal Power Plant 3 2.2 Thermal Power Plant Operation 4 2.2.1 Fuel and Combustion 4 2.2.2 Rankine Cycle 4 2.3 Thermal Power Plant Control 6 2.3.1 Turbine Governor 7 2.4 Amagerværket Block 1 7 2.5 Frequency Control 9 2.5.1 Frequency Control in the ENTSO-E RG Continental Europe Power System 9 2.5.2 Frequency Control in the ENTSO-E RG Nordic Power System 10 2.5.3 Decentralized Frequency Control Action 11 2.5.4 Centralized Frequency Control Action 12 3 MODELING 14 3.1 Modeling and Simulation Software 14 3.1.1 Acausality 14 3.1.2 Differential-Algebraic Equations 15 3.1.3 The ObjectStab Library 15 3.1.4 The ThermoPower Library 16 3.2 Connectors 16 3.3 Synchronous Generator 17 3.4 Steam Turbine 22 3.5 Control Valves 23 3.6 Boiler, Re-heater and Condenser 23 3.7 Overall Steam Cycle 23 3.8 Excitation System and Power System Stabilizer 24 3.9 Turbine Governor 25 3.10 Turbine-Generator Shaft 26 3.11 Overall Model 26 3.12 Boundary Conditions 27 3.13 Simplifications within the Model 28 3.13.1 Steam Cycle 28 3.13.2 Governor 28 3.13.3 Valves and Valve Characteristics 29 3.13.4
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT-1 THERMAL POWER STATIONS Introduction
    UNIT-1 THERMAL POWER STATIONS Introduction ➢ Thermal energy is the major source of power generation in India. More than 60% of electric power is produced by steam plants in India. India has large deposit of coal (about 170 billion tonnes), 5th largest in world. Indian coals are classified as A-G grade coals. ➢ In Steam power plants, the heat of combustion of fossil fuels is utilized by the boilers to raise steam at high pressure and temperature. The steam so produced is used in driving the steam turbines or sometimes steam engines couples to generators and thus in generating electrical energy. ➢ Steam turbines or steam engines used in steam power plants not only act as prime movers but also as drives for auxiliary equipment, such as pumps, stokers fans etc. ➢ Steam power plants may be installed either to generate electrical energy only or generate electrical energy along with generation of steam for industrial purposes such as in paper mills, textile mills, sugar mills and refineries, chemical works, plastic manufacture, food manufacture etc. ➢ The steam for process purposes is extracted from a certain section of turbine and the remaining steam is allowed to expand in the turbine. Alternatively the exhaust steam may be used for process purposes. ➢ Thermal stations can be private industrial plants and central station. Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Thermal Power Plant Advantages: ▪ Less initial cost as compared to other generating stations. ▪ It requires less land as compared to hydro power plant. ▪ The fuel (i.e. coal) is cheaper. ▪ The cost of generation is lesser than that of diesel power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • EHS Guidelines for Themal Power Plants
    Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines THERMAL POWER PLANTS DRAFT FOR SECOND PUBLIC CONSULTATION—MAY/JUNE 2017 WORLD BANK GROUP Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants Introduction 1. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are technical reference documents with general and industry-specific examples of Good International Industry Practice (GIIP).1 When one or more members of the World Bank Group are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as required by their respective policies and standards. These industry sector EHS guidelines are designed to be used together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of multiple industry-sector guidelines may be necessary. A complete list of industry-sector guidelines can be found at: www.ifc.org/ehsguidelines. 2. The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs. Application of the EHS Guidelines to existing facilities may involve the establishment of site-specific targets, based on environmental assessments and/or environmental audits as appropriate, with an appropriate timetable for achieving them. 3. The applicability of the EHS Guidelines should be tailored to the hazards and risks established for each project on the basis of the results of an environmental assessment (EA) in which site-specific variables, such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors, are taken into account. The applicability of specific technical recommendations should be based on the professional opinion of qualified and experienced persons.
    [Show full text]
  • JERA's Challenge for the Future of H2 Business
    JERA’s Challenge for the Future of H2 Business Satoshi Onoda President, Representative Director JERA Co., Inc. 14th October, 2020 © 2020 JERA Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved. JERA’s Profile ✓ JERA was founded in April 2015 by merging the fuel and thermal power generation sectors of TEPCO and CHUBU Electric Power. We now boast deep expertise in this field through its vertically integrated functions from upstream to downstream. Domestic Power Generation Upstream Overseas Power Generation Development （including Renewables and Batteries） and Fuel Procurement Gas liquefaction Base Fuel Transportation LNG Receiving and Trading and Storage Terminals Page 1 © 2020 JERA Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved. JERA Zero CO2 Emissions 2050 Taking on the challenge of zero CO2 emissions in JERA’s business both in Japan and overseas JERA Zero CO2 Emissions 2050 ➢ JERA’s mission is to provide cutting-edge solutions to the world’s energy issues. ➢ In order to help achieve a sustainable society, JERA, in the course of carrying out its mission, is taking on the challenge of achieving zero CO2 emissions* from its business both in Japan and overseas. The Three Approaches of JERA Zero CO2 Emissions 2050 1. Complementarity between Renewable Energy and Zero CO2 Emission Thermal Power Generation JERA will achieve Zero CO2 emissions through a combination of renewable energy and zero CO2 emission thermal power generation. The adoption of renewable energy is supported by thermal power generation capable of generating electricity regardless of natural conditions. JERA will promote the adoption of greener fuels and pursue thermal power that does not emit CO2 during power generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooling Water Treatment in a Thermal Power Station
    Cooling Water Treatment in a Thermal Power Station A case Study Ozonia – keeping abreast with time Treatment of Power Station Cooling Water In addition to being one of the strongest oxidant known, ozone provides an environmentally favourable disinfectant system producing no undesirable by- products. The stand-alone type plant consists of one of Ozonia’s larger standard OZAT ozone generator type CFL complete with an integrated power supply system; a feedgas preparation unit with compressor and dryer; an ozone contacting system made-up from motive pumps, high efficiency injectors and special in-line diffusers installed in the make-up lines; an Ozonia Switzerland and a water biocide dosing program being independent cooling system treatment company have used in the cooling system at and control system. The plant, successfully installed and the moment. which is designed for automatic commissioned a turnkey, fully service, has been fitted with a assembled, containerised The ozone, in conjunction with modem link system for remote ozone system in a large the biocide will represent one of monitoring and analytic work. Thermal Power Station. the most powerful controllable disinfection systems ever used In addition to the container The ozone produced by the on a cooling system and will plant, Ozonia have also plant will be used to treat the provide protection against supplied vent ozone destruct raw make-up water being fed to legionella and similar systems and ozone analysers the cooling towers and to undesirable micro-organisms to be installed
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Monitoring in Cooling Water Case Study
    Flow Monitoring in Cooling Water Timelkam, Austria Expertise in Flow Case Study Thermal power stations need cooling water for operation. The ADFM Pro20 Benefits of ADFM Pro20: Pulsed Doppler flow meter from Teledyne Isco is ideal for high accuracy flow 1-2% flow rate measure- monitoring in such large channel applications when sufficient particle con- ment accuracy centrations are present. In Timelkam, Austria, the ADFM Pro20 sensor is top ● Accurate velocity mounted in a cooling water channel coming from a river. This gives a great measurement in difficult advantage since the power station is in full operation during installation and hydraulic conditions maintenance, saving time and cost. ● Turbulence ● Near zero/ zero velocity ● Peak velocity shifting from side to side in channel ● High velocity (±9m/s) ● Large flow measuring span (0.2 - 6m level) ● 4 Pulsed Doppler velocity sensors in multiple points (bins) and pointing in different directions of the flow ● Measures velocity even if 1 or 2 sensors are covered ● Generates a true flow profile ● Calibration-free technology with zero drift of ultrasonic level ADFM Pro20 sensor top mounted in a cooling water channel (red arrow) ADFM Pro20 Sensor Power station site challenges A thermal power station uses fuel combustion to convert thermal energy into rotational energy, which produces mechanical power. Water is rapidly heated to a boil, vaporizing and spinning a large turbine, which in turn propels an electrical generator. After exiting the turbine, the steam is cooled in a condenser and reused. This process requires large quantities of cooling water. The biomass thermal power “The Future of Flow!” station Energie AG Oberösterreich, Timelkam uses a nearby river for cooling water.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Power Station Engineering Subject Code: BEE1504
    VEER SURENDRA SAI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY BURLA, ODISHA, INDIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Lecture Notes on Power Station Engineering Subject Code: BEE1504 5th Semester B.Tech. (Electrical Engineering) Lecture Notes Power Station Engineering Disclaimer This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. The information presented here is merely a collection by the committee members for their respective teaching assignments. Various sources as mentioned at the end of the document as well as freely available material from internet were consulted for preparing this document. The ownership of the information lies with the respective authors or institutions. Further, this document is not intended to be used for commercial purpose and the committee members are not accountable for any issues, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of this document. The committee members make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The committee members shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Department of Electrical Engineering, Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology Burla Page 2 Lecture Notes Power Station Engineering Syllabus MODULE-I (10 HOURS) Introduction to different sources of energy and general discussion on their application to generation. Hydrology: Catchments area of a reservoir and estimation of amount of water collected due to annual rainfall, flow curve and flow duration curve of a river and estimation of amount stored in a reservoir formed by a dam across the river, elementary idea about Earthen and Concrete dam, Turbines: Operational principle of Kaplan, Francis and Pelton wheel, specific speed, work done and efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • POWER STATION SITING and URBAN GROWTH by M. HER TAN* and G.E
    PAPER 11 " POWER STATION SITING AND URBAN GROWTH by M. HER TAN* and G.E. SMITH o 1. SUMMARY The future growth of urban development in Australia, together with a continued search for a higher stand- ard of living and a better quality of life, would depend to a large extent on an increased supply of electricity. It is estimated that by the end of the century, the installed generating capacity in Australia would range between 80,000 and 120,000 MW which would be accommodated on some 50 to 80 large power station sites. The location of future power stations, however, is becoming increasingly more difficult. As the generating capacity installed at one site increases, the siting requirements, safety criteria and environmental considerations are becoming more complex. Furthermore, as the growth in urban development continues, the availability of suitable sites for large power stations with their associated works and various easments is becoming limited. ,- Co-ordinated planning in the use of available resources, together with a better understanding of our environment and technological advances in generation and transmission of electricity, should reduce some of the problems in future power station siting. .. 2. INTRODUCTION The locations of early power plants in Australia and many overseas countries were generally close to the community centres, supplying the energy needs of the small but developing populations. The power plants were small and,widely scattered about the newly formed cities, while the countryside had no electricity at all. With the growth of urban development, continuing rise in energy demand and rapid technological advances in transmission of electricity, the locations of major power stations shifted in increasing numbers from the load centres to the fuel sources.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER- INEFFICIENT POWER Implementing Water Norms and Zero Discharge in India’S Coal-Power Fleet Research Director: Nivit Kumar Yadav
    WATER- INEFFICIENT POWER Implementing Water Norms and Zero Discharge in India’s Coal-Power Fleet Research director: Nivit Kumar Yadav Author: Sugandha Arora Research support: Shweta Sharma Editor: Archana Shankar Design and cover: Ajit Bajaj Production: Rakesh Shrivastava and Gundhar Das © 2021 Centre for Science and Environment Material from this publication can be used, but with acknowledgement. Citation: Nivit Kumar Yadav and Sugandha Arora 2021, Water-Inefficient Power: Implementing Water Norms and Zero Discharge in India’s Coal-Power Fleet, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi. Published by Centre for Science and Environment 41, Tughlakabad Institutional Area New Delhi 110 062 Phones: 91-11-40616000 Fax: 91-11-29955879 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cseindia.org Contents 1. Background 4 2015 water norms for coal-based power plants 6 Deadline ignored 7 2. Water compliance status of Indian power plants 10 Compliance status 10 Status of conversion of once-through cooling plants to closed-loop plants 16 Compliance to zero liquid discharge (ZLD) norm 18 Flaws identified in self-reported data and reporting format 20 3. State-wise profile and water compliance of surveyed states 24 4. Achieving zero liquid discharge in power plants 44 Identifying major water-consuming sections and wastewater streams 45 Strategies to achieve zero liquid discharge in power plants 51 5. The way forward to compliance and better reporting of data 58 References 65 1. BACKGROUND Water stress is an urgent reality in India. With increasing water stress in many parts of India, conflicts between industries and local communities have intensified. Increasing industrial production, especially in water-intensive industries like coal power plants, puts pressure on India’s limited freshwater resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Ammonia Co-Firing Analysis
    25 March 2021 JERA and Japan seek costly and dirty alternative to RE: Lengthening the lifeline of coal power in Japan Executive Summary ● Japan’s Green Growth Strategy released December 2020 set the pathway for Japan to test co-firing ammonia in coal power plants in 2021 and increase its use from 2030. Jera, a joint venture between Chubu electric and TEPCO, plans to start a pilot programme to use ammonia as a fuel with coal in mixed combustion at its Hekinan thermal power station in central Japan by 2030 and hopes to achieve 20% use of ammonia at all its coal-fired power plants by 2035. ● Ammonia co-firing is in its infancy currently with 20% fuel mix (calorific value) only recently reached. Several issues regarding ammonia combustion exist, including its low flammability, high NOx emission, and low radiation intensity. 100% ammonia-firing is currently unproven on commercial scale. ● This analysis suggests green ammonia will not be able to compete on cost with fossil based ammonia by 2050 without significant policy and regulatory changes. Fossil based ammonia with CCS/CCU, marketed as “blue”ammonia cannot be considered carbon neutral as EOR technology only furthers the use of fossil fuels and the life-cycle of carbon used via utilisation can not be adequately assessed. ● We find that mid-level fuel costs will increase Jera’s thermal coal power plants fuel bill to $2,680 billion per year without CCS (brown ammonia) and $3,034 billion per year with CCS (blue ammonia). An absolute increase of $1,207 billion and $1,561 billion per year respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation of Cooling Tower in Thermal Power Plant - a Case Study of RTPS, Karnataka
    International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-4 Issue-2, December 2014 Performance Evaluation of Cooling Tower in Thermal Power Plant - A Case Study of RTPS, Karnataka Pushpa B. S, Vasant Vaze, P. T. Nimbalkar Abstract: An evaporative cooling tower is a heat exchanger The water requirement for the close-loop system is hardly where transformation of heat takes place from circulating 10% as compared to once-through cooling water system. water to the atmosphere. The warm water from the Cooling towers are considered to be effective while condenser is taken as an inlet water to the cooling tower adopting the close-loop system. The merit of cooling tower and it is allowed to flow through the nozzles. As it falls is that it reuses the cooling water in the system and makes down across baffles or louvers, the water is broken into the system economical as well as environmental friendly. small droplets. Simultaneously air is drawn in through the Close loop system with cooling tower is used when the air inlet louvers provided at the base of the tower and then water resource is limited. If the condenser cooling system is this air travels upward through the tower in the opposite performing well, then it adds to the overall efficiency of direction of water flow. In this process a small portion of power plant. In a cooling tower, the condensate coming out water gets evaporated which removes the heat from the from the condenser is cooled by evaporation. Therefore, an remaining water causing it to cool down.
    [Show full text]
  • 07. Research Applying Dry Cooling in AP1000 Nuclear Power
    RESEARCH ON APPLYING DRY COOLING TECHNOLOGY IN CONVENTIONAL ISLAND OF AP1000 NUCLEAR POWER IN CHINA 3 Chai Jingyu1,c Li Wuquan2 Zheng Jingwei 1,2,3Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute, Beijing, China cChai Jingyu: Tel. :86+10+58388531; Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: In inland nuclear power plant adopted re-recycle water cooling system in conventional island，the water consuming is approximately double of the thermal power plant with the same capacity. When dry cooling technology is adopted, the water consuming is same with the coastal nuclear power plant, and the fuel do not increase which is always happed in the thermal power plant cause of the backpressure. The research of the applying dry cooling technology in inland nuclear power plant is urgent with good prospects. This paper focuses on the construction of AP1000 nuclear power in water lacking district inland, analyses the using of indirect dry cooling system, proposes some suggestions for the engineering practice. Keywords: Indirect dry cooling system; Lack of water region; Conventional island; Application. 0 INTRODUCTION According to “Development plan of nuclear power in medium and long term (2005-2020)” approved by the state council, China will adhere to the basic principle of "promote the construction of nuclear power actively" for electric power development, and enhance the construction of 1000MW pressurized water reactor nuclear power generation units. In 2008, national development and reform committee held a meeting on the development of inland nuclear power, and proposed that the third generation (AP1000) of nuclear power technology will be used in inland nuclear plants. The water consumption of inland nuclear power generation units is double of thermal power generation units with re-recycle water cooling system.
    [Show full text]