NCAA Fencing Championships (1941 to 2019)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NCAA Fencing Championships (1941 to 2019) NCAA Fencing Championships (1941 to 2019) In 1939, several schools submitted a request to the NCAA that they hold a national championship for men’s fencing. The NCAA approved this request in December of 1940. The NCAA has held championships in fencing every year since 1941 except for the four years 1943‐46 during World War II and its reconstruction. The first championships were held on one day, March 29, on five pistes at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. Seventy‐six men from 19 schools fenced from 9am to 11pm to determine the three individual champions. Participation was somewhat weakened by the fact that the schools in the northeast were participating in the Intercollegiate Fencing Association championships (which had been the de facto national championships for fencing) at Princeton on the same day. From 1941 through 1981, the championships were limited to men’s fencing events and four championships were contested: men’s epee individual, men’s foil individual, men’s sabre individual, and team (i.e., men’s three‐weapon). For these early championships, there were no qualifying competitions. From 1941 to 1947, each school could enter two fencers in each weapon, from 1948 to 1983 one fencer, and from 1984 to present two fencers. Until 1976 each school paid the entire expenses of their fencers attending the championships. Then the NCAA started paying some of the expenses of the fencers attending but also implemented restrictions on the total number of entries, first to 40 in each weapon and then down to 24. Since fencers now had to qualify for the Championships, many schools found out that they could no longer satisfy the qualification standards to send fencers. In the early Championships, a fencer was allowed to compete in more than one weapon. Andre Deladrier of St. John’s (NY) won the sabre championship in 1942 and also fenced in the epee and foil events that year finishing second in both. (He fenced 41 bouts in one day winning 28 of them.) Abraham Balk of NYU won both the epee and the foil championships in 1947. Two years after that, fencers were restricted to compete in only one weapon during one Championship. Since then, the only fencers to win the individual championship in more than one weapon have been Ben Atkins of Columbia/Barnard who won the foil in 1991 and the epee in 1993 and Felicia Zimmerman of Stanford who won the foil in 1998 and the epee in 1999. There have been cases of fencers transferring schools and representing different schools at different championships. Two recent examples are Daniel Cohen who represented Duke in men’s foil in 2009 finishing 6th and then represented Air Force in the same weapon in 2011 finishing 3rd. Brent Kelly represented Columbia in men’s epee in 2008 finishing 21st and then represented Notre Dame in the same weapon in 2011 finishing 16th. During most years, the championships were run as a complete round robin in each weapon with the champion decided by whoever had the most number of victories at the end of the round robin. If two or more fencers had the same number of victories, first place was decided by a fence‐off while all Prepared by George Masin 3/24/2019 remaining places were recorded as ties or by using touch indicators to resolve ties. In most years, the team championship was decided by adding to total number of victories a school had in all three weapons, not counting any fence‐off victories, though some years (e.g., 1966, 1990‐1997) other scoring systems were used and, since 2013, touch indicators are used to break all ties. For the 1954‐5 collegiate fencing season including the 1955 NCAA Championships, the NCAA coaches adopted a “no‐foul” rule that had been successfully used by the Big Ten fencing schools for the previous four years. At that point, both foil and sabre were being fenced non‐electrical with side judges used to determine whether touches had landed and whether they were on‐target or off‐target (i.e., foul). The “no‐foul” rule ignored off‐target touches. They neither caused the fencing action to be halted nor did they prevent a valid touch in a subsequent action from being scored. At the end of the 1955 Championships, a survey was made to determine its success. The coaches and fencers were strongly in favor of continuing to use the “no‐foul” rule for the following season or even permanently. The fencing officials were mostly opposed to the rule, mainly because they had trouble adjusting between using it during collegiate competitions while not using it during non‐collegiate competitions. They did, however, think that the rule made it easier for spectators to follow the action and easier for the referees to agree on the validity of awarding touches. By this time, the electrical scoring machines had been improved to eliminate early problems and the FIE announced that they would not be adopting a “no‐foul” rule. US Fencing therefore decided that they would also not adopt a “no‐foul” rule. Since this would mean that the schools would have to buy special fencing machines that did not register off‐target touches and because the fencing officials did not want to officiate at different competitions using such radically different rules, the experiment with the “no‐ foul” rule was ended. Ironically, when sabre was finally electrified in 1988, it was found difficult to show off‐target sabre hits on the fencing machines and so sabre fencing then adopted the “no‐foul” rule, some thirty years after collegiate fencing had proved that it was feasible. In 1966, the Ivy League schools boycotted the NCAA championships in all sports because of a dispute about academic standards. The NCAA fencing championships that year used a format not used in any of the other championships. The team championship was determined on the last day among the 27 schools that had brought a fencer in each of the 3 weapons. First the schools were seeded into four groups of six or seven schools. The schools fenced the other schools in their group and the four highest finishing schools in each group advanced to a double‐elimination direct elimination. Schools that did not promote out of the first round or did not bring 3 fencers were not included in the NCAA’s official team championship standings. For schools in the NCAA’s official team standings, I show their record in the preliminary groups and then their record in the double direct elimination. For the schools that did not promote, I show them as tied for 17th place with their records in the preliminary groups. For schools that participated in the individual events but not in the team event, I show them as “NP” (not participating) in the team results. In 1977, New York University and Notre Dame finished in a tie for first place with 114 victories each. Under the rules then in place, the two schools should have been declared co‐champions. Hugo Castello, Prepared by George Masin 3/24/2019 the NYU coach, and Mike DeCicco, the Notre Dame coach, went together to the bout committee and said that they didn’t want a co‐championship. Instead they proposed that their sabre, foil, and epee fencers fence each other in that order and whichever school won two of the three bouts would be the champion and the other school would be second. Since the coaches were in agreement, the bout committee waived the rules and allowed the fence‐off. Notre Dame won the first two bouts (making the third bout unnecessary) and was declared the sole team champion. Beginning in 1982, two women’s NCAA championships were contested: women’s foil individual and women’s team. The first two women’s NCAA championships were held at a different venue than the men’s championships in those years. Starting in 1984, the two championships were hosted by the same school. The inclusion of women’s fencing meant that there were two overall team championships: a men’s team which was based on the combined results in the 3 weapons and a women’s team which was based on just foil results. In 1990, the single men’s 3‐weapon team championship was changed into three team championships, one for each weapon, and one combined team championships was awarded for the best combined men’s and women’s results. In addition to these team championships, individual championships were also held. For schools that participated in the individual events but not in the team event, I show them as “NP” (not participating) in the team results. In 1995, women’s epee was added to the championships and the four weapon‐specific team championships were dropped leaving only the combined team championship which now included the women’s epee results. The format returned to individual events with the team championship determined by the individual results. Beginning in 2000 a women’s sabre individual championship was added and those results were included in the combined team championship. The NCAA fencing championships has thus consisted in its current format of six individual championships and one combined team championship since 2000. Of the twelve different types of national championships that the NCAA has awarded in fencing, 34 schools have won at least one of them. The greatest number of NCAA fencing championships have been won by Columbia/Barnard with 60, followed by Penn State with 52, and Notre Dame with 48. The top three schools that have won the most of each type of championship are: Men’s Epee Individual (75 championships) – New York University (10), Columbia/Barnard, St.
Recommended publications
  • 2020-21 MANUAL NCAA General Administrative Guidelines
    2020-21 MANUAL NCAA General Administrative Guidelines Contents Section 1 • Introduction 2 Section 1•1 Definitions 2 Section 2 • Championship Core Statement 2 Section 3 • Concussion Management 3 Section 4 • Conduct 3 Section 4•1 Certification of Eligibility/Availability 3 Section 4•2 Drug Testing 4 Section 4•3 Honesty and Sportsmanship 4 Section 4•4 Misconduct/Failure to Adhere to Policies 4 Section 4•5 Sports Wagering Policy 4 Section 4•6 Student-Athlete Experience Survey 5 ™ Section 5 • Elite 90 Award 5 Section 6 • Fan Travel 5 Section 7 • Logo Policy 5 Section 8 • Research 6 Section 9 • Division I 6 Section 9•1 Religious Conflicts 6 THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 6222 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6222 317-917-6222 ncaa.org November 2020 NCAA, NCAA logo, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Elite 90 are registered marks of the Association and use in any manner is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Association. NCAA PRE-CHAMPIONSHIPS MANUAL 1 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES Section 1 • Introduction The Pre-Championship Manual will serve as a resource for institutions to prepare for the championship. This manual is divided into three sections: General Administrative Guidelines, Sport-Specific Information, and Appendixes. Sections one through eight apply to policies applicable to all 90 championships, while the remaining sections are sport specific. Section 1•1 Definitions Pre-championship Manual. Resource for institutions to prepare for the championship. Administrative Meeting. Pre-championship meeting for coaches and/or administrators. Appendixes. Any supplemental documents to be provided and distributed through the various resources. Championship Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Swordsmanship and Sabre in Fribourg
    Acta Periodica Duellatorum, Hands-on section, articles 103 Hands-on section, articles Sweat and Blood: Swordsmanship and sabre in Fribourg Mathijs Roelofsen, PhD Student, University of Bern [email protected], and Dimitri Zufferey, Independant Researcher, GAFSchola Fribourg, [email protected] Abstract – Following a long mercenary tradition, Switzerland had to build in the 19th century its own military tradition. In Cantons that have provided many officers and soldiers in the European Foreign Service, the French military influence remained strong. This article aims to analyze the development of sabre fencing in the canton of Fribourg (and its French influence) through the manuals of a former mercenary (Joseph Bonivini), a fencing master in the federal troops (Joseph Tinguely), and an officer who became later a gymnastics teacher (Léon Galley). These fencing manuals all address the recourse to fencing as physical training and gymnastic exercise, and not just as a combat system in a warlike context. Keywords – Sabre, Fribourg, Valais, Switzerland, fencing, contre-pointe, bayonet I. INTRODUCTION In military history, the Swiss are known for having offered military service as mercenaries over a long time period. In the 19th century, this system was however progressively abandoned, while the country was creating its own national army from the local militias. The history of 19th century martial practices in Switzerland did not yet get much attention from historians and other researchers. This short essay is thus a first attempt to set some elements about fencing in Switzerland at that time, focusing on some fencing masters from one Swiss Canton (Fribourg) through biographical elements and fencing manuals.
    [Show full text]
  • NCAA Fencing Championship Zachary Moss Concordia University, Saint Paul
    Concordia University St. Paul DigitalCommons@CSP Master of Arts in Sport Management 2015 NCAA Fencing Championship Zachary Moss Concordia University, Saint Paul Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/sport-management_masters Part of the Sports Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Moss, Zachary, "NCAA Fencing Championship" (2015). Master of Arts in Sport Management. 3. https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/sport-management_masters/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Arts in Sport Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@CSP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY, ST. PAUL: ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA: DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND HEALTH SCIENCE NCAA Fencing Championship A GRADUATE PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree in Sport Management by Zachary Moss St. Paul, Minnesota June 2015 ii © Zachary Moss iii Dedications This project is dedicated to everyone who helped me accomplish my dream of working in college athletics – to my parents, my friends, my coaches, my mentors, and my girlfriend. I couldn’t have accomplished anything without all of your support. iv Abstract This paper examined the many aspects of planning, organizing, and managing a sporting event. Specifically, it focused on the management of the 2019 NCAA Fencing Championships utilizing Welsh-Ryan Arena at Northwestern University as the host site. Every aspect of the event is examined beginning with the organization responsible for it, going through the structure of the event itself, outlining a marketing plan for the event, analyzing the management of employees and volunteers, discussing of potential risks associated with the facility for this event, analyzing ethical concerns of the event itself, and concluding with personal reflection from the paper’s author.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Lives Through Fencing for Over Two Decades
    THE PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION Transforming Lives Through Fencing For Over Two Decades 2012 ANNUAL REPORT PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION Table of Contents Executive Letter Page 3 The Peter Westbrook Foundation, Program Goals Page 3 Inc. is a not for profit organization that utilizes the sport of fencing as a vehicle to PWF Programs Page 4 develop life skills in young people from underserved communities. Success Stories Page 6 Community Corner Page 7 Endowment Fund Page 9 Summary Statement & Activities Page 11 Family of Sponsors & Board Members Page 12 On the cover: Olympic Silver Medalist, Erinn Smart teaches the next generation of Olympians. Right: President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden congratulate Nzingha Prescod and Team USA on their performance at the 2012 Olympics Games. 2 Executive Letter Now that the 20th Anniversary celebrations “And when you are and London Olympics have past, parents, colleagues and others often ask me what I striving to be the envision for the next 20 years of the Peter Westbrook Foundation's existence. best youth On the one hand this question is easy to enrichment answer; at a high level what the PWF wants program in the to do for the next 20 years and beyond is to stay true to our mission of improving the lives country, having a of children through our combined athletic, mentoring and educational programs. In detailed plan for order to do so, our organization will continue to draw from our core strengths namely: an sustainability and inspired and selfless leadership team, a devoted volunteer staff, an active and growth is vital.” engaged board of directors, and of course, our PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION dedicated parents and students.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Columbia Fencing Record Book.Indd
    COLUMBIA FENCING RECORD BOOK COLUMBIA FENCING PROGRAM HONORS THE NATIONAL STAGE NCAA TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS - 16 Chris Reohr Sabre 1986 Steve Trevor Épée 1993 Ben Atkins Épée 1987 Bob Cottingham Sabre 1951 (M) 1965 (M) 1989 (M) 1988 Bob Cottingham Sabre 1952 (M) 1968 (M) 1992 (C) NCAA SQUAD CHAMPIONS - 6 Ivan Fernandez-Madrid Foil 1954 (M) 1971 (M) (tie) 1993 (C) 1989 Jon Normile Épée 1955 (M) 1987 (M) 2015 (C) 1990 Men’s Foil 1990 Mike Feldschuh Épée 1963 (M) 1988 (M) 2016 (C) 1991 Men’s Épée 1991 Mike Feldschuch Épée 2019 (C) 1991 Men’s Foil Steve Kovacs Sabre 1992 Men’s Épée 1992 Ben Atkins Épée NCAA INDIVIDUAL CHAMPIONS - 38 1993 Men’s Épée Steve Kovacs Sabre 1993 Men’s Sabre 1993 Steve Kovacs Sabre 1950 Robert Nielsen Foil 1994 Steve Kovacs Sabre 1951 Robert Nielsen Foil IFA TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS - 16 1996 Jennifer Curtis Foil Daniel Chafetz Épée 1997 Noah Zucker Épée 1954 Stephen Sobel Sabre 1934 1965 1988 Susan Jennings Foil 1955 Barry Pariser Sabre 1951 1972 1992 Dan Kellner Foil 1956 Ralph DeMarco Foil 1954 1984 1996 1998 Dan Kellner Foil Gerald Kaufman Sabre 1958 1986 2003 Erinn Smart Foil 1957 James Margolis Épée 1962 1987 2008 2001 Jed Dupree Foil 1962 Barton Nisonson Sabre 1963 Erinn Smart Foil 1963 Jay Lustig Foil 2004 Jeremy Sinkin Foil 1965 Joseph Nalven Foil IFA INDIVIDUAL CHAMPIONS - 62 Alex Krul Sabre 1969 Tony Kestler Foil 1894 Chas. Townsend Foil Christian Robinson Sabre 1970 Bruce Soriano Sabre 1896 Chas. Townsend Foil 2007 Kurt Getz Foil 1971 Bruce Soriano Sabre 1902 Frederic Clark Foil Dara Schneider Sabre 1972 Bruce Soriano Sabre 1903 Frederic Clark Foil 2008 Jeff Spear Sabre 1976 Brian Smith Sabre 1905 Frederico Lage Foil 2009 Neely Brandfi eld-Harvard Épée 1985 Katy Bilodeau Foil 1914 Steddiford Pitt Foil Nicole Ross Foil 1987 Bill Mindel Foil Waldo Shumway Sabre Jeff Spear Sabre Katy Bilodeau Foil 1916 Louis Mouquin Foil 1988 Jon Normile Épée 1918 Horcasitas Foil IVY LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIPS -53 Marc Kent Foil 1919 Millard Bloomer Foil Bob Cottingham Sabre 1924 H.
    [Show full text]
  • National Collegiate Men's and Women's Fencing
    NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MEN’S AND WOMEN’S FENCING CHAMPIONSHIPS RECORDS BOOK 2016 Championship 2 History 4 All-Time Team Results 8 2016 CHAMPIONSHIP HIGHLIGHTS Columbia takes home second straight title: The final day of action at the 2016 NCAA National Collegiate Fencing Championships, held at Brandeis, saw three repeat winners. Two individuals achieved the feat, while Columbia was crowned the team champions for the second year running. The Lions took a 13-point lead into the day, and though it closed to double digits at certain points throughout the day, the repeat was not really in question. Columbia finished with a seven-point victory, 174-167, over Ohio State, thanks to a balanced attack that saw them score 30 points in three of the six weapons and not less than 24 in any of them. “To come out ahead shows what a great group of individuals we have on our team,” Columbia coach Michael Aufrichtig said. “Other than all the practices and workouts and all the preparation, one of the main things it came down to is their heart, their love for each other. So when they’re out there on the strip, they’re fencing for not just themselves but for their entire team.” Columbia is the first repeat NCAA Fencing champion since Penn State in 2009 and 2010. It’s the Lions’ fourth overall combined title since the championship went to this format in 1990. They also won back-to-back titles in 1992 and 1993. Ohio State finished in second place despite qualifying one less than the maximum 12 qualifiers for the championship.
    [Show full text]
  • Swordplay Through the Ages Daniel David Harty Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI Interactive Qualifying Projects (All Years) Interactive Qualifying Projects April 2008 Swordplay Through The Ages Daniel David Harty Worcester Polytechnic Institute Drew Sansevero Worcester Polytechnic Institute Jordan H. Bentley Worcester Polytechnic Institute Timothy J. Mulhern Worcester Polytechnic Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all Repository Citation Harty, D. D., Sansevero, D., Bentley, J. H., & Mulhern, T. J. (2008). Swordplay Through The Ages. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/3117 This Unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Interactive Qualifying Projects at Digital WPI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Interactive Qualifying Projects (All Years) by an authorized administrator of Digital WPI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IQP 48-JLS-0059 SWORDPLAY THROUGH THE AGES Interactive Qualifying Project Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation by __ __________ ______ _ _________ Jordan Bentley Daniel Harty _____ ________ ____ ________ Timothy Mulhern Drew Sansevero Date: 5/2/2008 _______________________________ Professor Jeffrey L. Forgeng. Major Advisor Keywords: 1. Swordplay 2. Historical Documentary Video 3. Higgins Armory 1 Contents _______________________________ ........................................................................................0 Abstract: .....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Schedule Sunday, April 18Th 6:42 Pm Et - Midnight Et Monday, April 19Th 10:00 Am Et - 2:00 Pm Et 6:42 Pm Et - Midnight Et
    BROADCAST SCHEDULE SUNDAY, APRIL 18TH 6:42 PM ET - MIDNIGHT ET MONDAY, APRIL 19TH 10:00 AM ET - 2:00 PM ET 6:42 PM ET - MIDNIGHT ET WATCH IT ALL LIVE AT: NOTREDAMEDAY.ND.EDU SUNDAY, APRIL 18TH, 2021 6:42 PM ET HOUR » 6:46 PM ET REV. JOHN I. JENKINS, C.S.C. — President, University of Notre Dame » 6:53 PM ET SHEA AQUILANO ‘23 — Student who competes in Ultra Marathons » 6:57 PM ET JOHN SEXTON ‘23 — Student who invented solution for his “Domer” Dad with ALS » 7:02 PM ET NOTRE DAME ORCHESTRA — Performance » 7:07 PM ET ALLAN NJOMO ‘22 — Student body president » 7:11 PM ET DREW BREES — NFL’s all-time leader in total passing yards / NBC Game Analyst for Notre Dame Football » 7:20 PM ET ELLIOTT THOMAZIN ‘23 — Student magician will perform on set » 7:25 PM ET PAUL CASSIDY ‘23 — Student with a unique coffee service » 7:28 PM ET ANTHONY ESPLIN ’21 MS — Student who created the Sleep Easy Oxygen Pillow » 7:33 PM ET J.J. WRIGHT ’14 MSM, ’17 DMA — Director, University of Notre Dame Folk Choir » 7:36 PM ET MARIEL ZAGUNIS — Two-time Olympic Fencing Champion, 2012 US Olympic Team Flagbearer » 7:43 PM ET VERONICA MANSOUR ’21 — Student who composed her own musical 8:00 PM ET HOUR » 8:06 PM ET KEVIN MURRAY ’21 — Student who leads Sports Analytics Club » 8:10 PM ET MATT VERDESHI ’23 — Student who led St. Ed’s “Mullets for Malaria” event » 8:14 PM ET AARON BANKS ‘21 — Former Notre Dame offensive lineman » 8:23 PM ET MICKI KIDDER ’19 MBA — Vice President for University Enterprises & Events » 8:33 PM ET OWEN KRANSZ ’22 — Student engineer for IrishSat, a student
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Fencing Champ Record.Pdf
    NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MEN’S AND WOMEN’S Fencing NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MEN’S AND WOMEN’S History Results Year Champion Coach Points Runner-Up Points Host or Site 1990........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 36 Columbia-Barnard 35 Notre Dame 1991........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 4,700 Columbia-Barnard 4,200 Penn St. 1992........................ Columbia-Barnard George Kolombatovich/Aladar Kogler 4,150 Penn St. 3,646 Notre Dame 1993........................ Columbia-Barnard George Kolombatovich/Aladar Kogler 4,525 Penn St. 4,500 Wayne St. (Mich.) 1994........................ Notre Dame Michael DeCicco/Yves Auriol 4,350 Penn St. 4,075 Brandeis 1995........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 440 St. John’s (N.Y.) 413 Notre Dame 1996........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 1,500 Notre Dame 1,190 Yale 1997........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 1,530 Notre Dame 1,470 Air Force 1998........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 149 Notre Dame 147 Notre Dame 1999........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 171 Notre Dame 139 Brandeis 2000........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 175 Notre Dame 171 Stanford St. John’s (N.Y.) 171 2001........................ St. John’s (N.Y.) Yury Gelman 180 Penn St. 172 Wis.-Parkside 2002........................ Penn St. Emmanuil Kaidanov 195 St. John’s (N.Y.) 190 Drew 2003........................ Notre Dame Janusz Bednarski 182 Penn St. 179 Air Force 2004........................ Ohio St. Vladimir Nazlymov 194 Penn St. 160 Brandeis 2005........................ Notre Dame Janusz Bednarski 173 Ohio St. 171 Houston 2006........................ Harvard Peter Brand 165 Penn St. 159 Rice Note: In 1990, team scoring was based on standings in weapon team events. In 1991, the scoring system was expanded to allow fencers not qualifying as part of a team to con- tribute points to team standings through their individual performances.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier De Presse
    DOSSIER DE PRESSE CHALLENGE INTERNATIONAL DE PARIS 2016 1 Sommaire Présentation de l’événement ……………………………………………………………………………..p.3 Le CIP en quelques mots …………………………………………………………………………………….p.4 Programme de l’édition 2016……………………………………………………………………………..p.5 Les chiffres clef du CIP …………………………………………………………………………………….....p.6 Les Français engagés ....…..………………………………………………………………………………….p.7 Les délégations étrangères ……………………………………………………………………………......p.9 Les favoris en individuel ..…………………………………………………………………………….….p.15 Les favoris par équipes …………………………………………………………………………………....p.17 Le palmarès du CIP …………………………………………………………………………………………..p.18 Couverture de l’événement ……………………………………………………………………...………p.19 Les partenaires du CIP 2016……………………………………………………………………….....…p.20 Informations medias …………………………………………………………………………….…….……p.21 2 Présentation de l’événement Les 16 et 17 janvier 2016, les meilleurs fleurettistes de la planète se donneront rendez-vous au stade Coubertin pour la plus prestigieuse épreuve de coupe du monde de l’année! Créé en 1953 sous l’appellation « Challenge Martini » avant de devenir de 1991 à 1998 le « Challenge Brut de Fabergé », le Challenge International de Paris est vite devenu une référence dans le calendrier international. Qui remportera l’épreuve individuelle samedi 16 janvier et soulèvera le fameux trophée Christian d’Oriola, du nom de son premier vainqueur? Les prétendants sont nombreux: Race Imboden (USA) vainqueur l’an passé, le champion du monde Yuki Ota (JPN), l’armada italienne (Cassara, Garozzo, Luperi…), sans oublier nos français Enzo Lefort (vainqueur en 2014), Erwann Le Péchoux (vainqueur en 2011) ou Jérémy Cadot (finaliste en 2013). Le lendemain fera place à une compétition par équipes, cruciale dans la qualification aux Jeux olympiques 2016! La voie vers Rio est ouverte pour l’équipe de France actuellement 1ère au classement olympique provisoire. Nos tricolores devront confirmer leur statut de favoris pour valider définitivement leur ticket pour le Brésil.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Fencing Coaches in the United States and Their Contribution to the Development of American Fencing After 1989
    MACIEJ ŁUCZAK Department of History and Organization of Physical Culture Chair of Humanistic Foundations of Physical Culture University School of Physical Education, Poznań [email protected] TOMASZ SKIRECKI Department of Polish-AngloSaxon Cultural Relations School of English Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań [email protected] POLISH FENCING COACHES IN THE UNITED STATES AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN FENCING AFTER 1989 In the first decade of the 21st century the United States has joined the historical leading European fencing powers: France, Italy, Russia, Germany, Hungary and Poland. At the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens the American fencers won the gold and bronze medals in women’s individual saber – an event debuting in the Olympic program. Four years later at the Olympics in Beijing the US fenc- ers swept all three medals in women’s individual saber, bronze in women’s team saber, silver in women’s team foil and silver in men’s team saber. Olym- pic fencing, especially women’s saber fencing, is currently in its heyday in the United States.1 It is an important part of collegiate athletics and the number of fencing clubs in the USA is probably the largest in the world. 1 E. Korfanty, Preface, [in:] Z. Borysiuk, Modern Saber Fencing, SKA SwordPlay Books, Staten Is- land, NY 2009, p. 17. 172 MACIEJ ŁUCZAK AND TOMASZ SKIRECKI The author of the mentioned successes of the American women’s saber in the two consecutive Olympics is a Polish fencing master Edward Korfanty, who is regarded as one of the most renowned fencing coaches in the present- day United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Defence on Foot with the Broad Sword and Sabre
    THE ART OF DEFENCE ON FOOT WITH THE BROAD SWORD AND SABRE FOURTH EDITION BY CHARLES ROWORTH 1824 TRANSCRIBED. RESTORED AND INTRODUCED BY NICK THOMAS INSTRUCTOR AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE ACADEMY OF HISTORICAL FENCING (UK) Presented below is a complete reconstruction of the fourth edition of Charles Roworth's 'Art of Defence', or AOD as it is sometimes now known. The AOD is one of the most important references on British swordsmanship on foot in the Napoleonic period, The British army did not adopt an official infantry sword system until after war's end. However, when they did, it was based on this style depicted by Charles Roworth, as well as Henry Angelo Senior, whose son created the official system in 1817, based firmly on his father’s methods. Despite not being an official system, these 'broadsword' methods were widespread throughout the 18th century. In the case of Roworth's AOD manual, it was recommended for purchase and use by British officers in many publications of the time. They are also well referenced to have been taught in many military units. Roworth's manuals give the most in-depth insight into infantry sword combat in this period, and likely served as the basis of sword training for many in the army and militia of the day. As well as a method for those elsewhere, such as in America, where this edition was published. The Art of Defence was first published in 1798. This second edition was also published in the same year, and though very similar, it features a number of changes to both text and illustration.
    [Show full text]