Quantum-Enhanced continuous-wave stimulated Raman spectroscopy

R. B. Andrade,1 H. Kerdoncuff,2 K. Berg-Srensen,1 T. Gehring,1 M. Lassen,2 and U. L. Andersen1 1Center for Macroscopic Quantum States bigQ, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej 307, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby. 2Danish Fundamental Metrology, Kogle Alle 5, DK-2970, Denmark. Stimulated Raman spectroscopy has become a powerful tool to study the spatiodynamics of molecular bonds with high sensitivity, resolution and speed. However, sensitivity and speed of state- of-the-art stimulated Raman spectroscopy are currently limited by the shot-noise of the light beam probing the Raman process. Here, we demonstrate an enhancement of the sensitivity of continuous- wave stimulated Raman spectroscopy by reducing the quantum noise of the probing light below the shot-noise limit by means of amplitude squeezed states of light. Probing polymer samples with Raman shifts around 2950 cm−1 with squeezed states, we demonstrate a quantum-enhancement of the stimulated Raman signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 3.60 dB relative to the shot-noise limited SNR. Our proof-of-concept demonstration of quantum-enhanced Raman spectroscopy paves the way for a new generation of Raman microscopes, where weak Raman transitions can be imaged without the use of markers or an increase in the total optical power.

I. INTRODUCTION In this article, we demonstrate the quantum enhance- ment of continuous-wave (cw) SRS using amplitude Optical quantum sensing exploits the unique quantum squeezed light. We demonstrate its functionality and correlations of non-classical light to enhance the detec- superiority by spectroscopically measuring the carbon- tion of physical parameters beyond classical means [1– hydrogen (C-H) vibrations of polymethylmethacrylate 5]. While several different quantum states of light can, (PMMA) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with a in principle, be used to provide such a quantum advan- sensitivity-improvement of approximately 56% relative to tage, so far, it is only the ubiquitous squeezed states of shot-noise limited Raman spectrometer. Our measure- light that have demonstrably shown to provide a real ment method has the potential to enable new measure- practical advantage [6–8]. Squeezed states of light have ment regimes of Raman bio-imaging that are inaccessible for example enabled quantum-enhanced measurements of by the conventional shot-noise limited Raman spectrom- mechanical displacements [5, 9], magnetic fields [10, 11], eter. viscous-elasticity of cells [12] and, most prominently, gravitational waves [13]. Another field that could signifi- cantly benefit from quantum-enhanced sensing by means II. BASIC CONCEPT of squeezed light – but yet not demonstrated – is Stimu- lated Raman Spectroscopy (SRS). SRS employs two laser beams – known as the pump SRS is a very powerful technique to perform real-time and the probe (Stokes) laser beams – to coherently ex- vibrational imaging of living cells and organisms and it cite a selected molecular vibration of the system under has therefore provided a deeper understanding of prop- investigation. If the vibrational frequency of the chem- erties of biological systems [14–17]. It is based on the ical bond matches the frequency difference of the pump stimulated excitation of a Raman transition of the sam- and probe laser, the Raman interaction is stimulated and ple under interrogation, thereby resulting in a measur- as a result significantly amplified by orders of magni- able stimulated Raman loss and gain of the two input tude. In the stimulated Raman effect, a photon is anni- beams, respectively. It allows for non-invasive and in- hilated from the pump beam and simultaneously a Ra- vivo measurements with short acquisition times [18] and man shifted photon is created in the background noise has enabled the structural and dynamical imaging of of the probe beam. This background noise is fundamen- lipids [19, 20] as well as the characterization of healthy tally limited by shot-noise when using a probe beam in and tumorous brain tissues [21, 22]. a from a conventional laser, but it can arXiv:2002.04674v1 [physics.optics] 11 Feb 2020 In SRS, the sensitivity and the imaging speed are fun- be reduced by using a laser beam in a squeezed state. damentally limited by the noise level (often shot-noise) of By using a bright amplitude squeezed beam (squeezed the probing laser [23, 24] but can in principle be arbitrar- state with a large coherent excitation), the quantum- ily improved simply by increasing the power of the input enhanced sensitivity is directly proportional to the stan- beams. However, in biological system, especially in living dard deviation of√ the squeezed amplitude quadrature, systems, the power must be kept low to avoid changing ∆X: δ ∝ ∆X/ ISRS. Here ISRS is the intensity of the biological dynamics of the specimens or even dam- the SRS signal which changes linearly with the inten- aging it due to excessive heating. Leaving the optical sity of the probe (Is) and pump (Ip) as ISRS = KIpIs, power at a constant level, the sensitivity and bandwidth where K is a constant related to the number of probed of the SRS can be boosted by reducing the shot-noise molecules and their Raman cross section [25]. It is thus level using squeezed states of light. clear that the sensitivity can be improved without chang- 2 ing the power by reducing the noise of the amplitude trance of the microscope we estimated an overall opti- quadrature. cal efficiency of around ηpath = 85 %, while each of the two microscope objectives had a transmission efficiency of 97 %. The visibility between the coherent and the III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP squeezed beam was 95 %. Thus, the total efficiency trans- mission of the 1064 nm path including also the detection The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. It consists losses was estimated to ηtotal=67 %. of two modules: the bright squeezed light module and In this work we use two different solid samples to the SRS module as will now be discussed in detail. characterize the SRS process, PMMA and PDMS. Both samples have Raman transitions in the region between Bright Squeezed Light Module: The laser source was an −1 Innolight GmbH Diabolo operating at 1064 nm with an 2800–3100 cm corresponding to vibration modes of C- internal module for second harmonic generation (SHG) H bonds [27, 28]. We start by classically characterizing at 532 nm. The squeezed state was generated in a lin- the Raman transition of a PMMA sample of 2 mm thick- ear optical parametric oscillator (OPO) cavity consisting ness and a pump laser with a power at the sample of 38 mW and tuned to the wavelength of 810.241 nm to of a periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate (PP- −1 KTP) crystal and a hemispheric coupling mirror. When hit the Raman transition at 2948.32 cm . The SRS sig- pumping with a power of 80 mW at 532 nm, setting the nal was measured on the probe beam (due to the stimu- phase of the pump beam to deamplification and inject- lated gain) at the modulation frequency of the pump at 10.45 MHz, and we acquired a power spectrum around ing a seed beam with a power of 600 µW at 1064 nm, the OPO produced 7 dB of amplitude squeezed light. this frequency. In absence of the SRS signal only mea- More details about the squeezed light source can be surement noise was detected. The data presented have found in [26]. The amplitude squeezed light and a co- all been measured using a resolution bandwidth of 30 Hz herent beam at 1064 nm were combined on an asymmet- and a video bandwidth of 1 Hz, each data point was av- ric (99/1) beam splitter to produce a bright amplitude eraged 30 times and the electronic noise was subtracted squeezed beam. The phase between these beams was ac- in all the measurements. The probe power was changed tively stabilized by feeding a phase shifter in the coher- from 250 µW to 2.0 mW, as shown in Fig. 2a) and we ent beam path with an error signal that was generated clearly observe the expected linear dependency between by electronically demodulating the photo detected beat SRS signal and probe power. The polarization behavior of the bright coherent beam and the 37.22 MHz phase between pump and probe beams are shown in Fig. 2b) modulation side-bands accompanying the squeezed field. where the red trace represents the signal when the pump The output of the 99 % port of the BS was sent to the and probe beams were parallel polarized while the blue SRS module serving as the probe beam for Raman spec- trace corresponds to the signal when the beams were or- troscopy. thogonal polarized. It is clear that the Raman signal dis- appears in the latter case, thus further corroborating the Stimulated Raman Module: The pump beam for SRS presence of real Raman signal in the former case [29, 30]. was a tunable Ti:Sapph laser (MSquare SolsTiS) scanned Both traces were normalized by the shot-noise. from 800 nm to 830 nm. It delivered a maximum output power of 200 mW which could be adjusted at the en- Having verified the C-H Raman transition, in the trance to the microscope. The pump beam intensity was following we present the demonstration of quantum- modulated at 10.45 MHz with a sinusoidal function us- enhanced SRS. To clearly demonstrate quantum- ing a resonant electro-optical amplitude modulator. The improved performance beyond the conventional ap- beam size of the pump beam was adjusted with a set of proach, we conducted the experiment both with the lenses (MM lenses) in order to optimize the overlap with probe beam in a coherent state (limited by shot-noise the probe beam. A fine adjustment in the polarization and representing the conventional approach) and in the between the pump and the probe beams was made using squeezed state. The experimental scheme could easily a HWP (half-wave plate) in the probe path. After com- be swapped between the two modes of operation simply bining the probe and the pump beams at a dichroic mir- by blocking and unblocking the squeezed vacuum state which will have no effect on the probe or pump input ror, both beams were focused to a spot size of 2.5 µm on the sample with a 20x microscope objective. The beams powers. were collected and collimated by a second microscope ob- jective after which the pump beam was filtered using a long-pass filter and the probe beam was detected using IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS a photodiode with a quantum efficiency of more than 99 % (Fermionics InGaAs FD500). The stimulated Ra- Figure 3 presents our experimental results for man gain was deduced from the power spectrum which quantum-enhanced SRS. We present the spectra for the was recorded using an electrical spectrum analyzer. Raman shift of PMMA using both a coherent state (for An important factor when using squeezed light are comparison) and a squeezed state with optical powers of the optical losses in the optical pathway of the squeezed 1.3 mW while the pump power was set to 24 mW (Fig. 3a) beam. From the output of the OPO cavity to the en- and 11 mW(Fig. 3b). It is clear from the spectra that the 3

a) 10.45 MHz b) Coherent HWP HWP PBS Ti:Sapph Beam EOM Laser MM lenses PBS Amplitude QWP Optical Modulator power control 37.22 MHz HWP PBS Coherent Probe DM FO FO Squeezed probe 2 BS PD SQZ Beam PD Optical filter spectrum OPO +37.22 MHz 99/1 sample power control analyzer

Bright SQZ Beam module Bright SQZ Beam Stimulated Raman Setup HWP

FIG. 1: Experimental setup to measure the SRS signal enhanced by squeezed light. a) Bright squeezed beam preparation at 1064 nm. The squeezed state is combined with the coherent beam in a 99/1 beam splitter (BS) to generate a bright squeezed state at one output serving as the probe for the SRS setup while the other output is used to phase lock the relative phase of the two beams (using a phase modulation at 37.22 MHz). b) SRS setup. A wavelength-tunable Ti:Sapph laser is intensity modulated at the frequency of 10.45 MHz and serve as the pump beam. The pump and probe beams are overlapped in a dichroic mirror (DM) and focused into the sample using a microscope objective (FO). The SRS signal is collected using a second objective, the pump beam is filtered off and the probe beam is measured using a high quantum efficiency (HQE) photodiode. The results are acquired by an electronic spectrum analyzer (ESA) by which a power spectrum of the signal is attained. HWP: half wave plate, PBS: polarizing beam splitter, PD: photodiode, BS: beam splitter, QWP: quarter wave plate, DM: dichroic mirror, FO: focal objective, EOM: electro-optical modulator , MM lenses: mode matching lenses.

usage of squeezed light significantly improves the signal- plying an average pump power of 28 mW and a probe to-noise ratio and therefore the sensitivity of the Raman power of 1.3 mW, the pump laser wavelength is set up to spectrometer. We see in particular that for pump powers 810.213 nm corresponding to a Raman shift 2948.75 cm−1 lower than around 11 mW, the Raman signal is almost and the PMMA content in the sample was detected. embedded in shot-noise and only becomes pronounced Fig. 5 a) shows the result. Afterwards, to detect the when using squeezed states of light. It is therefore clear PDMS content in the sample, the pump wavelength was that by using the quantum-enhanced operation mode, it changed to 813.111 nm corresponding to the vibrational is possible to attain Raman signals even for low pump mode 2904.76 cm−1. The result is shown in Fig. 5 b). powers. This is of importance when studying fragile bio- The remaining area comprising polystyrene exhibits no logical systems where excessive powers might change the signals as it has no vibrational modes in the interro- dynamics of the system. gated frequency region. We clearly see from the fig- The SRS process provides a Raman spectrum simi- ure that PMMA and PDMS can be distinguished with lar to the spectrum generated using Spontaneous Ra- the method, and we also find that squeezed light out- man Spectroscopy techniques. Using a PDMS sample performs coherent light operation in the entire imag- and sweeping the pump laser, manually, from 803.36 nm ing plane. These proof-of-concept imaging measurements to 816.36 nm, the Raman spectrum of C-H stretching demonstrate the usefulness of the quantum-enhanced Ra- modes in the region between 2850-3100 cm−1 was ac- man method for microscopy. quired and it is depicted in Fig. 4. The probe and the pump optical powers were 1.3 mW and 28 mW, respec- tively. While scanning the wavelength of the pump laser, the optical pump power was continuously measured and V. CONCLUSION used to normalize the acquired Raman spectrum at every wavelength. In Fig. 4 the spectra are shown for coherent In summary, we demonstrated a sensitivity enhance- (red trace) and squeezed states (blue trace). Lorentzian ment of the stimulated Raman process using squeezed multi-peak fits were used to obtain the two Raman shifts states of light. The quantum enhancement was measured in table I. to be more than 50% in comparison to the conventional To demonstrate the potential of using the quantum- approach with coherent states. Our technique was used enhanced Raman spectrometer as a microscope, we per- to visualize spectroscopically the Raman bands within formed a rough raster scan of a sample consisting of three the C-H stretching region of polymer samples (PMMA different polymers; PMMA, PDMS and polystyrene. A and PDMS) and to perform chemically specific imaging 3-axes translational stage with differential micrometer measurements. The sensitivity of our quantum spectrom- screws was used to move, manually, the sample position eter can be further improved by minimizing the optical in steps of 1 mm in a square region of 7x7 mm2. The losses of the system and by employing states with a higher SRS signal was acquired using coherent and squeezed degrees of squeezing. Moreover, to realize real and high- states of light alternately for each displacement. Ap- resolution SRS imaging, the sample should be scanned 4

−1 −1 Probe Beam Assignment νP eakA (cm ) SNRA(dB) νP eakB (cm ) SNRB (dB) Coherent light C-H sym 2905.17 (0.15) 6.49 (0.08) 2965.46 (1.17) 0.95 (0.18) Ampl. squeezed light C-H sym 2905.07 (0.14) 10.05 (0.07) 2966.74 (0.80) 2.01 (0.18)

TABLE I: Raman resonances of PDMS: Peak A and Peak B. The Raman shifts are represented as νP eakA and νP eakB .

a) a)

b) b)

FIG. 2: Characterization of the SRS signal using an average pump power of 38 mW. a) Intensity of the SRS signal as FIG. 3: Demonstration of quantum enhanced SRS using a function of the probe power. b) Polarization behavior of probe powers of 1.3 mW and pump powers of: a) 24 mW and the SRS signal using 1.35 mW of power in the probe beam. b) 11 mW. The red SRS traces correspond to the realizations The red trace represents the signal when the probe and pump where the probe beams are in a coherent state while the blue beams are parallel polarized while the blue trace is associated traces correspond to the beams being in a squeezed state with to orthogonal polarized beams. All traces are normalized to -3.60 dB noise suppression below the shot-noise. In both cases the shot-noise level. the signals are normalized to the shot-noise level.

access to detailed information and the rich dynamics of with high spatial resolution and the objectives replaced different biological samples. with ones with higher numerical apertures. We believe that our demonstration opens the door to new possibilities for Raman spectroscopy and mi- croscopy. Using squeezed light to enhance the sensitivity Funding of the stimulated Raman signal enables studies of biologi- cal samples with a lower risk of damage due to high beam The work was partly supported by the Danish National powers. This might enable the studies of bio-physical ef- Research Foundation through the Center for Macroscopic fects that may not be visible using the standard classical Quantum States (bigQ, DNRF412), partly by the In- approaches. The presented method is not limited to the novation Foundation Denmark (Qubiz). Hugo Kerdon- wavenumber range investigated in this work but can be cuff and Mikael Lassen acknowledge financial support extended to the fingerprint region (500–1800 cm−1) by from the Danish Agency for Institutions and Educa- appropriate choice of laser wavelengths, thereby giving tional Grants and EMPIR project 17FUN01-BeCOMe. 5

Peak A The EMPIR initiative is funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and co- financed by the EMPIR participating states.

Peak B

FIG. 4: SRS spectrum of PDMS. The pump beam is scanned Disclosures around the C-H stretching region with pump and probe pow- ers of 28 mW and 1.3 mW, respectively. The traces are nor- malized to the shot-noise level. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser. Optica, 5(7):850–856, Jul 2018. Quantum Sensing with Squeezed Light. ACS Photonics, [12] Michael A. Taylor, Jiri Janousek, Vincent Daria, Joachim 6(6):1307–1318, 6 2019. Knittel, Boris Hage, Hans A. Bachor, and Warwick P. [2] S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, Bowen. Biological measurement beyond the quantum and S. Lloyd. Advances in photonic quantum sensing. limit. Nature Photonics, 7(3):229–233, 3 2013. Nature Photonics, 12(12):724–733, 2018. [13] The LIGO Scientific Collaboration. Enhanced sensitivity [3] K. Marshall, C. S. Jacobsen, C. Sch¨afermeier, of the detector by using squeezed T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and U. L. Andersen. states of light. Nature Photonics, 7(8):613 – 619, 2013. Continuous-variable quantum computing on encrypted [14] Christian W. Freudiger, Wenlong Yang, Gary R. Holtom, data. Nature Communications, 7, 12 2016. Nasser Peyghambarian, X. Sunney Xie, and Khanh Q. [4] Michael A. Taylor and Warwick P. Bowen. Quantum Kieu. Stimulated Raman scattering microscopy with a metrology and its application in biology. Physics Reports, robust fibre laser source. Nature Photonics, 8(2):153– 615:1–59, 2 2016. 159, 2 2014. [5] Ulrich B. Hoff, Glen I. Harris, Lars S. Madsen, Hugo [15] Charles H. Camp and Marcus T. Cicerone. Chemically Kerdoncuff, Mikael Lassen, Bo M. Nielsen, Warwick P. sensitive bioimaging with coherent Raman scattering. Bowen, and Ulrik L. Andersen. Quantum-enhanced mi- Nature Photonics, 9(5):295–305, 5 2015. cromechanical displacement sensitivity. Optics Letters, [16] J. X. Cheng and X. S. Xie. Coherent Raman scattering 38(9):1413, 5 2013. microscopy. CRC Press, 1st edition edition, 1 2016. [6] A. I. Lvovsky. Squeezed Light. In David L. Andrews, [17] Robin R. Jones, David C. Hooper, Liwu Zhang, Daniel editor, Photonics, chapter 5, pages 121–163. John Wiley Wolverson, and Ventsislav K. Valev. Raman Techniques: and Sons, Ltd, 2015. Fundamentals and Frontiers. Nanoscale Research Letters, [7] Ulrik L Andersen, Tobias Gehring, Christoph Marquardt, 14(1), 12 2019. and Gerd Leuchs. 30 years of squeezed light generation. [18] Hyeon Jeong Lee and Ji-Xin Cheng. Imaging chemistry Physica Scripta, 91(5):053001, 4 2016. inside living cells by stimulated raman scattering mi- [8] Roman Schnabel. Squeezed states of light and their ap- croscopy. Methods, 128:119 – 128, 2017. plications in laser interferometers. Physics Reports, 684, [19] Wei Dou, Delong Zhang, Yookyung Jung, Ji Xin Cheng, 11 2016. and David M. Umulis. Label-free imaging of lipid-droplet [9] Raphael C. Pooser and Benjamin Lawrie. Ultrasensitive intracellular motion in early Drosophila embryos using measurement of microcantilever displacement below the femtosecond-stimulated Raman loss microscopy. Bio- shot-noise limit. Optica, 2(5):393–399, 5 2015. physical Journal, 102(7):1666–1675, 4 2012. [10] Florian Wolfgramm, Alessandro Cer`e, Federica A. [20] Meng C. Wang, Wei Min, Christian W. Freudiger, Gary Beduini, Ana Predojevi´c,Marco Koschorreck, and Mor- Ruvkun, and X. Sunney Xie. RNAi screening for fat gan W. Mitchell. Squeezed-light optical magnetometry. regulatory genes with SRS microscopy. Nature Methods, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:053601, 7 2010. 8(2):135–138, 2 2011. [11] Bei-Bei Li, Jan B´ılek, Ulrich B. Hoff, Lars S. Madsen, [21] Minbiao Ji, Daniel A. Orringer, Christian W. Freudi- Stefan Forstner, Varun Prakash, Clemens Sch¨afermeier, ger, Shakti Ramkissoon, Xiaohui Liu, Darryl Lau, Tobias Gehring, Warwick P. Bowen, and Ulrik L. Ander- Alexandra J. Golby, Isaiah Norton, Marika Hayashi, sen. Quantum enhanced optomechanical magnetometry. Nathalie Y.R. Agar, Geoffrey S. Young, Cathie Spino, 6

a) PMMA imaging b) PDMS imaging FIG. 5: SRS imaging of different polymers in a sample comprising PDMS, PMMA and polystyrene. a) Imaging of SRS resonances attained when the pump laser frequency was set to reach the PMMA vibrational mode 2948.75 cm−1. b) Imaging the vibrational mode 2904.76 cm−1 of PDMS. The remaining area (polystyrene) does not produce an SRS signal.

Sandro Santagata, Sandra Camelo-Piragua, Keith L. Tobias Gehring, and Ulrik L. Andersen. Determinis- Ligon, Oren Sagher, and X. Sunney Xie. Rapid, label-free tic phase measurements exhibiting super-sensitivity and detection of brain tumors with stimulated raman scatter- super-resolution. Optica, 5(1):60, 1 2018. ing microscopy. Science Translational Medicine, 5(201), [27] Stoil Dirlikov and Jack L. Koenig. Carbonhydrogen 9 2013. stretching and bending vibrations in the Raman spectra [22] Fa Ke Lu, David Calligaris, Olutayo I. Olubiyi, Isa- of poly (methylmethacrylate). Journal of Raman Spec- iah Norton, Wenlong Yang, Sandro Santagata, X. Sun- troscopy, 9(3):150–154, 6 1980. ney Xie, Alexandra J. Golby, and Nathalie Y.R. Agar. [28] A. Lee Smith and Dennis R. Anderson. VIBRATIONAL Label-free neurosurgical pathology with stimulated Ra- SPECTRA OF Me2SiCl2, Me3SiCl, Me3SiOSiMe3, man imaging. Cancer Research, 76(12):3451–3462, 6 (Me2SiO)3, (Me2SiO)4, (Me2SiO)x, AND THEIR 2016. DEUTERATED ANALOGS. Applied Spectroscopy, [23] M. J. Moester, F. Ariese, and J. F. De Boer. Optimized 38(6):822–834, 1984. signal-to-noise ratio with limited detection in [29] M. Tanaka and R. J. Young. Review Polarised Raman stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Journal of the spectroscopy for the study of molecular orientation dis- European Optical Society, 10, 2015. tributions in polymers. Journal of Materials Science, [24] Hugo Kerdoncuff, Mikael Lassen, and Jan C. Petersen. 41(3):963–991, 2 2006. Continuous-wave coherent Raman spectroscopy for im- [30] Hugo Kerdoncuff, Mark R. Pollard, Philip G. Wester- proving the accuracy of Raman shifts. Optics Letters, gaard, Jan C. Petersen, and Mikael Lassen. Compact 44(20):5057, 10 2019. and versatile laser system for polarization-sensitive stim- [25] Robert W. Boyd. Nonlinear Optics. Academic Press, ulated Raman spectroscopy. Optics Express, 25(5):5618, 2008. 3 2017. [26] Clemens Sch¨afermeier,Miroslav Jeˇzek,Lars S. Madsen,