DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1401.4118V2 [Quant-Ph] 28 Jul 2016 Π1/4 the Same Amplitude

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1401.4118V2 [Quant-Ph] 28 Jul 2016 Π1/4 the Same Amplitude Squeezed light A. I. Lvovsky Institute for Quantum Information Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, T2N 1N4 and Russian Quantum Center, 100 Novaya St., Skolkovo, Moscow region, 143025, Russia∗ (Dated: July 29, 2016) The squeezed state of the electromagnetic field can be generated in many nonlinear optical pro- cesses and finds a wide range of applications in quantum information processing and quantum metrology. This article reviews the basic properties of single-and dual-mode squeezed light states, methods of their preparation and detection, as well as their quantum technology applications. I. WHAT IS SQUEEZED LIGHT? If R > 1, the position variance is below that of the vac- uum state, so jsqRi is position-squeezed; for R < 1 the A. Single-mode squeezed light state is momentum-squeezed. In other words, if we pre- pare multiple copies of jsqRi, and perform a measure- In squeezed states of light, the noise of the electric field ment of the squeezed observable on each copy, our mea- at certain phases falls below that of the vacuum state. surement results will exhibit less variance than if we per- This means that, when we turn on the squeezed light, formed the same set of measurements on multiple copies we see less noise than no light at all. This apparently of the vacuum state. paradoxical feature is a direct consequence of quantum More generally, we say that a state of a single harmonic oscillator exhibits (quadrature) squeezing if the variance nature of light and cannot be explained within the clas- 2 sical framework. of the position, momentum, or any other quadrature The basic idea of squeezing can be understood by con- in which the state exhibits variance below 1=2. In ac- sidering the quantum harmonic oscillator, familiar from cordance with the uncertainty principle, both position undergraduate quantum mechanics. Its vacuum state and momentum observables, or any two quadratures as- wavefunction in the dimensionless position basis is given sociated with orthogonal angles, cannot be squeezed at by1 the same time. For example, in state (3) the product ∆X2 ∆P 2 = 1=4 is the same as that for the vacuum 1 2 (X) = e−X =2; (1) state (1). 0 π1=4 Squeezing is best visualized by means of the Wigner which in the momentum basis corresponds to function | the quantum analogue of the phase-space probability density. Figure 1(c,d) display the Wigner Z +1 1 −iP X 1 −P 2=2 functions of the position- and momentum-squeezed vac- ~ (P ) = p e (X)dX = e 0 0 1=4 2π −∞ π uum states, respectively. The squeezing feature becomes (2) apparent when these Wigner functions are compared (so the vacuum state wavefunction is the same in the with that of the vacuum state [Fig. 1(a)]. Figure 1(e,f) position and momentum bases). The variance of the po- shows squeezed coherent states, which are analogous to sition and momentum observables in the vacuum state the squeezed vacuum except that their Wigner function equals h0j ∆X2 j0i = h0j ∆P 2 j0i = 1=2. is displaced from the phase space origin akin to the co- The wavefunction of the squeezed-vacuum state jsqRi herent state [Fig. 1(b)]. with the squeezing factor R > 0 is obtained from that of The state shown in Fig. 1(f) is particularly interest- the vacuum state by means of scaling transformation: ing because it exhibits, as a consequence of momentum p squeezing, phase squeezing | reduction of the uncer- R −(RX)2=2 tainty in the phase with respect to a coherent state of R(X) = e ; (3) arXiv:1401.4118v2 [quant-ph] 28 Jul 2016 π1=4 the same amplitude. Because the Schr¨odingerevolution and under the standard harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian cor- responds to clockwise rotation of the phase space around ~ 1 −(P=R)2=2 R(P ) = p e (4) the origin point, the phase squeezing property is pre- 1=4 π R served under this evolution. In the same context, the in the position and momentum bases, respectively. In state in Fig. 1(e) is sometimes called amplitude squeezed. this state, the variances of the two canonical observables According to the quantum theory of light, the Hilbert are space associated with a mode of the electromagnetic field is isomorphic to that of the mechanical harmonic oscil- ∆X2 = 1=(2R2) and ∆P 2 = R2=2: (5) ∗ 2 ^ ^ ^ [email protected] The field quadrature is observable Xθ = X cos θ + P sin θ, where 1 We use convention [X;^ P^] = i for the quadrature observables. θ is a real number known as quadrature angle. 2 p lator. The role of the position and momentum observ- the position operator X^ = (^a +a ^y)= 2 in this state is ables in this context is played by the electric field magni- zero while its variance equals tudes measured at specific phases. For example, the field (^a +a ^y)2 1 at phase zero (with respect to a certain reference) cor- h∆X2i = h j j i = − s; (7) responds to the position observable, that at phase π=2 2 2 to the momentum observable, and so on. Accordingly, so state j i is position squeezed for positive s. phase-sensitive measurements of the field in an electro- a) b) magnetic wave are affected by quantum uncertainties. For the coherent and vacuum states, this uncertainty is pump pump phase-independent and equals p !=2" V (the standard photon ~ 0 crystal crystal pair quantum limit, or SQL), where ! is the optical frequency photon pair and V is the quantization volume [1]. But squeezed op- tical states exhibit uncertainties below SQL at certain FIG. 2. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. a) De- phases. generate configuration, leading to single-mode squeezed vac- Dependent on whether the mean coherent amplitude of uum. b) Non-degenerate configuration, leading to two-mode the state is zero, squeezed optical states are classified into squeezed vacuum. squeezed vacuum and (bright) squeezed light. Squeezed coherent states form a subset of bright squeezed light This result illustrates one of the primary methods states. of producing squeezing. Spontaneous parametric down- a) b) conversion (SPDC) is a nonlinear optical process in which a photon of a powerful laser field propagating through a P XP P XPsecond-order nonlinear optical medium may split into two 2 -200 24 6 -2 2 2 -200 24 6 -2 2 photons of lower energy. The frequencies, wavevectors X Dj X -2 246 -2 246 and polarizations of the generated photons are governed by phase-matching conditions. Single-mode squeezing, -2 -2 such as that in the above example, is obtained when SPDC is degenerate: the two generated photons are in- c) d) distinguishable in all their parameters: frequency, direc- P XP P XPtion, and polarization. The quantum state of the optical 2 -200 24 6 -2 2 2 -200 24 6 -2 2 mode into which the photon pairs are emitted exhibits X X squeezing [Fig. 2(a)]. -2 246 -2 246 Aside from being an interesting physical entity by it- -2 -2 self, squeezed light has a variety of applications. One of the primary applications of single-mode squeezed light e) f) is in precision measurements of distances. Such mea- P P surements are typically done by means of interferometry. 2 XP 2 XPQuantum phase noise poses an ultimate limit to inter- -200 24 6 -2 2 -200 24 6 -2 2 ferometry, and the application of squeezing (in particu- X Dj X -2 246 -2 246 lar, the phase squeezed state discussed above) permits -2 -2 expanding this limit beyond the fundamental boundary defined by the SQL. For example, squeezing is employed in the new generation of gravitational wave detectors | FIG. 1. Wigner functions of certain single-oscillator states. GEO 600 in Europe and LIGO in the United States. a) Vacuum state. b) coherent state. c,d) Position- and momentum-squeezed vacuum states. e,f) Position- and momentum-squeezed coherent states with real amplitudes. B. Two-mode squeezed light Panels (b) and (f) show the phase uncertainties of the respec- tive states to emphasize the phase squeezing of state (f). In- sets show wavefunctions in the position and momentum bases. A state that is closely related to the single-oscillator squeezed vacuum in its theoretical description and ex- perimental procedures, but quite different in properties How can one generate optical squeezed states in exper- is the two-mode squeezed vacuum (TMSV), also known iment? Consider the state as the twin-beam state. As the name suggests, this is a state of not one, but two mechanical or electromagnetic s j i = j0i − p j2i ; (6) oscillators. We introduce this state by first analyzing the 2 tensor product j0i⊗j0i of vacuum states of the two oscil- where j0i and j2i are photon number (Fock) states and lators. In the position basis, its wavefunction [Fig. 3(a)], s is a real positive number. We assume s to be small, so 1 −X2=2 −X2=2 Ψ (X ;X ) = p e a e b (8) the norm of state (6) is close to one. The mean value of 00 a b π 3 can be rewritten as both Alice's and Bob's observables: 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 ~ −(Pa−Pb) =(4R ) −R (Pa+Pb) =4 Ψ (X ;X ) = p e−(Xa−Xb) =4e−(Xa+Xb) =4: (9) ΨR(Pa;Pb) = p e e : (11) 00 a b π π We see that for R > 1 Alice's and Bob's momenta are Here, X and X are the position observables of the p a b anticorrelated, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enhancing the Sensitivity of the LIGO Gravitational Wave Detector by Using Squeezed States of Light
    , Enhancing the sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light J. Aasi1, J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott9 M. R. Abernathy1, C. Adams3, T. Adams36, P. Addesso55, R. X. Adhikari1, C. Affeldt4;11, O. D. Aguiar75, P. Ajith1, B. Allen4;5;11, E. Amador Ceron5, D. Amariutei8, S. B. Anderson1, W. G. Anderson5, K. Arai1, M. C. Araya1, C. Arceneaux29, S. Ast4;11, S. M. Aston3, D. Atkinson7, P. Aufmuth4;11, C. Aulbert4;11, L. Austin1, B. E. Aylott10, S. Babak12, P. T. Baker13, S. Ballmer25, Y. Bao8, J. C. Barayoga1, D. Barker7, B. Barr2, L. Barsotti15, M. A. Barton7, I. Bartos17, R. Bassiri2;6, J. Batch7, J. Bauchrowitz4;11, B. Behnke12, A. S. Bell2, C. Bell2, G. Bergmann4;11, J. M. Berliner7, A. Bertolini4;11, J. Betzwieser3, N. Beveridge2, P. T. Beyersdorf19, T. Bhadbhade6, I. A. Bilenko20, G. Billingsley1, J. Birch3, S. Biscans15, E. Black1, J. K. Blackburn1, L. Blackburn30, D. Blair16, B. Bland7, O. Bock4;11, T. P. Bodiya15, C. Bogan4;11, C. Bond10, R. Bork1, M. Born4;11, S. Bose22, J. Bowers9, P. R. Brady5, V. B. Braginsky20, J. E. Brau24, J. Breyer4;11, D. O. Bridges3, M. Brinkmann4;11, M. Britzger4;11, A. F. Brooks1, D. A. Brown25, D. D. Brown10, K. Buckland1, F. Br¨uckner10, B. C. Buchler34, A. Buonanno27, J. Burguet-Castell49, R. L. Byer6, L. Cadonati28, J. B. Camp30, P. Campsie2, K. Cannon63, J. Cao31, C. D. Capano27, L. Carbone10, S. Caride32, A. D. Castiglia61, S. Caudill5, M. Cavagli`a29, C. Cepeda1, T. Chalermsongsak1, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coherent State Path Integral for the Harmonic Oscillator 11
    COHERENT STATE PATH INTEGRAL FOR THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR AND A SPIN PARTICLE IN A CONSTANT MAGNETIC FLELD By MARIO BERGERON B. Sc. (Physique) Universite Laval, 1987 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1989 © MARIO BERGERON, 1989 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis . for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) Abstract The definition and formulas for the harmonic oscillator coherent states and spin coherent states are reviewed in detail. The path integral formalism is also reviewed with its relation and the partition function of a sytem is also reviewed. The harmonic oscillator coherent state path integral is evaluated exactly at the discrete level, and its relation with various regularizations is established. The use of harmonic oscillator coherent states and spin coherent states for the computation of the path integral for a particle of spin s put in a magnetic field is caried out in several ways, and a careful analysis of infinitesimal terms (in 1/N where TV is the number of time slices) is done explicitly.
    [Show full text]
  • Coherent and Squeezed States on Physical Basis
    PRAMANA © Printed in India Vol. 48, No. 3, __ journal of March 1997 physics pp. 787-797 Coherent and squeezed states on physical basis R R PURI Theoretical Physics Division, Central Complex, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay 400 085, India MS received 6 April 1996; revised 24 December 1996 Abstract. A definition of coherent states is proposed as the minimum uncertainty states with equal variance in two hermitian non-commuting generators of the Lie algebra of the hamil- tonian. That approach classifies the coherent states into distinct classes. The coherent states of a harmonic oscillator, according to the proposed approach, are shown to fall in two classes. One is the familiar class of Glauber states whereas the other is a new class. The coherent states of spin constitute only one class. The squeezed states are similarly defined on the physical basis as the states that give better precision than the coherent states in a process of measurement of a force coupled to the given system. The condition of squeezing based on that criterion is derived for a system of spins. Keywords. Coherent state; squeezed state; Lie algebra; SU(m, n). PACS Nos 03.65; 02-90 1. Introduction The hamiltonian of a quantum system is generally a linear combination of a set of operators closed under the operation of commutation i.e. they constitute a Lie algebra. Since their introduction for a hamiltonian linear in harmonic oscillator (HO) oper- ators, the notion of coherent states [1] has been extended to other hamiltonians (see [2-9] and references therein). Physically, the HO coherent states are the minimum uncertainty states of the two quadratures of the bosonic operator with equal variance in the two.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Coherent States and Path Integral Quantiza- Tion. 1.1 Coherent States Let Q and P Be the Coordinate and Momentum Operators
    1 Coherent states and path integral quantiza- tion. 1.1 Coherent States Let q and p be the coordinate and momentum operators. They satisfy the Heisenberg algebra, [q,p] = i~. Let us introduce the creation and annihilation operators a† and a, by their standard relations ~ q = a† + a (1) r2mω m~ω p = i a† a (2) r 2 − Let us consider a Hilbert space spanned by a complete set of harmonic os- cillator states n , with n =0,..., . Leta ˆ† anda ˆ be a pair of creation and annihilation operators{| i} acting on that∞ Hilbert space, and satisfying the commu- tation relations a,ˆ aˆ† =1 , aˆ†, aˆ† =0 , [ˆa, aˆ] = 0 (3) These operators generate the harmonic oscillators states n in the usual way, {| i} 1 n n = aˆ† 0 (4) | i √n! | i aˆ 0 = 0 (5) | i where 0 is the vacuum state of the oscillator. Let| usi denote by z the coherent state | i † z = ezaˆ 0 (6) | i | i z = 0 ez¯aˆ (7) h | h | where z is an arbitrary complex number andz ¯ is the complex conjugate. The coherent state z has the defining property of being a wave packet with opti- mal spread, i.e.,| ithe Heisenberg uncertainty inequality is an equality for these coherent states. How doesa ˆ act on the coherent state z ? | i ∞ n z n aˆ z = aˆ aˆ† 0 (8) | i n! | i n=0 X Since n n−1 a,ˆ aˆ† = n aˆ† (9) we get h i ∞ n z n n aˆ z = a,ˆ aˆ† + aˆ† aˆ 0 (10) | i n! | i n=0 X h i 1 Thus, we find ∞ n z n−1 aˆ z = n aˆ† 0 z z (11) | i n! | i≡ | i n=0 X Therefore z is a right eigenvector ofa ˆ and z is the (right) eigenvalue.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailing Coherent, Minimum Uncertainty States of Gravitons, As
    Journal of Modern Physics, 2011, 2, 730-751 doi:10.4236/jmp.2011.27086 Published Online July 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jmp) Detailing Coherent, Minimum Uncertainty States of Gravitons, as Semi Classical Components of Gravity Waves, and How Squeezed States Affect Upper Limits to Graviton Mass Andrew Beckwith1 Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China E-mail: [email protected] Received April 12, 2011; revised June 1, 2011; accepted June 13, 2011 Abstract We present what is relevant to squeezed states of initial space time and how that affects both the composition of relic GW, and also gravitons. A side issue to consider is if gravitons can be configured as semi classical “particles”, which is akin to the Pilot model of Quantum Mechanics as embedded in a larger non linear “de- terministic” background. Keywords: Squeezed State, Graviton, GW, Pilot Model 1. Introduction condensed matter application. The string theory metho- dology is merely extending much the same thinking up to Gravitons may be de composed via an instanton-anti higher than four dimensional situations. instanton structure. i.e. that the structure of SO(4) gauge 1) Modeling of entropy, generally, as kink-anti-kinks theory is initially broken due to the introduction of pairs with N the number of the kink-anti-kink pairs. vacuum energy [1], so after a second-order phase tran- This number, N is, initially in tandem with entropy sition, the instanton-anti-instanton structure of relic production, as will be explained later, gravitons is reconstituted. This will be crucial to link 2) The tie in with entropy and gravitons is this: the two graviton production with entropy, provided we have structures are related to each other in terms of kinks and sufficiently HFGW at the origin of the big bang.
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 604, Lecture 39
    ECE 604, Lecture 39 Fri, April 26, 2019 Contents 1 Quantum Coherent State of Light 2 1.1 Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Revisited . 2 2 Some Words on Quantum Randomness and Quantum Observ- ables 4 3 Derivation of the Coherent States 5 3.1 Time Evolution of a Quantum State . 7 3.1.1 Time Evolution of the Coherent State . 7 4 More on the Creation and Annihilation Operator 8 4.1 Connecting Quantum Pendulum to Electromagnetic Oscillator . 10 Printed on April 26, 2019 at 23 : 35: W.C. Chew and D. Jiao. 1 ECE 604, Lecture 39 Fri, April 26, 2019 1 Quantum Coherent State of Light We have seen that a photon number state1 of a quantum pendulum do not have a classical correspondence as the average or expectation values of the position and momentum of the pendulum are always zero for all time for this state. Therefore, we have to seek a time-dependent quantum state that has the classical equivalence of a pendulum. This is the coherent state, which is the contribution of many researchers, most notably, George Sudarshan (1931{2018) and Roy Glauber (born 1925) in 1963. Glauber was awarded the Nobel prize in 2005. We like to emphasize again that the mode of an electromagnetic oscillation is homomorphic to the oscillation of classical pendulum. Hence, we first con- nect the oscillation of a quantum pendulum to a classical pendulum. Then we can connect the oscillation of a quantum electromagnetic mode to the classical electromagnetic mode and then to the quantum pendulum. 1.1 Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Revisited To this end, we revisit the quantum harmonic oscillator or the quantum pen- dulum with more mathematical depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Coherent States and Path Integrals with Auxiliary Variables
    J. Php A: Math. Gen. 26 (1993) 1697-1715. Printed in the UK Extended coherent states and path integrals with auxiliary variables John R Klauderi and Bernard F Whiting$ Department of Phyirx, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3261 1, USA Received 7 July 1992 in final form 11 December 1992 AbslracL The usual construction of mherent slates allows a wider interpretation in which the number of distinguishing slate labels is no longer minimal; the label measure determining the required mlution of unity is then no longer unique and may even be concentrated on manifolds with positive mdimension. Paying particular attention to the residual restrictions on the measure, we choose to capitalize on this inherent freedom and in formally distinct ways, systematically mnslruct suitable sets of mended mherent states which, in a minimal sense, are characterized by auxilialy labels. Inlemtingly, we find these states lead to path integral constructions containing auxilialy (asentially unconstrained) pathapace variabla The impact of both standard and mended coherent state formulations on the content of classical theories is briefly aamined. the latter showing lhe sistence of new, and generally constrained, clwical variables. Some implications for the handling of mnstrained classical systems are given, with a complete analysis awaiting further study. 1. Intduction 'Ifaditionally, coherent-state path integrals have been constructed using a minimum number of quantum operators and classical variables. But many problems in classical physics are often described in terms of more variables than a minimal formulation would entail. In particular, we have in mind constraint variables and gauge degrees of freedom. Although such additional variables are frequently convenient in a classical description, they invariably become a nuisance in quantization.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2003.13443V1 [Astro-Ph.IM] 26 Mar 2020 Minimum in the Phase Quadrature, Thus Reducing Shot Broadband Improvement in Sensitivity
    Frequency-Dependent Squeezing for Advanced LIGO L. McCuller,1, ∗ C. Whittle,1, y D. Ganapathy,1 K. Komori,1 M. Tse,1 A. Fernandez-Galiana,1 L. Barsotti,1 P. Fritschel,1 M. MacInnis,1 F. Matichard,1 K. Mason,1 N. Mavalvala,1 R. Mittleman,1 Haocun Yu,1 M. E. Zucker,1, 2 and M. Evans1 1LIGO, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2LIGO, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA (Dated: March 31, 2020) The first detection of gravitational waves by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) in 2015 launched the era of gravitational wave astronomy. The quest for gravitational wave signals from objects that are fainter or farther away impels technological advances to realize ever more sensitive detectors. Since 2019, one advanced technique, the injection of squeezed states of light is being used to improve the shot noise limit to the sensitivity of the Advanced LIGO detectors, at frequencies above 50 Hz. Below this frequency, quantum back action, in the form of radiation pressure induced motion∼ of the mirrors, degrades the sensitivity. To simultaneously reduce shot noise at high frequencies and quantum radiation pressure noise at low frequencies requires a quantum noise filter cavity with low optical losses to rotate the squeezed quadrature as a function of frequency. We report on the observation of frequency-dependent squeezed quadrature rotation with rotation frequency of 30 Hz, using a 16 m long filter cavity. A novel control scheme is developed for this frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum source, and the results presented here demonstrate that a low-loss filter cavity can achieve the squeezed quadrature rotation necessary for the next planned upgrade to Advanced LIGO, known as \A+." I.
    [Show full text]
  • `Nonclassical' States in Quantum Optics: a `Squeezed' Review of the First 75 Years
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience `Nonclassical' states in quantum optics: a `squeezed' review of the first 75 years This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 2002 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 4 R1 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1464-4266/4/1/201) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 132.206.92.227 The article was downloaded on 27/08/2013 at 15:04 Please note that terms and conditions apply. INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF OPTICS B: QUANTUM AND SEMICLASSICAL OPTICS J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 4 (2002) R1–R33 PII: S1464-4266(02)31042-5 REVIEW ARTICLE ‘Nonclassical’ states in quantum optics: a ‘squeezed’ review of the first 75 years V V Dodonov1 Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal de Sao˜ Carlos, Via Washington Luiz km 235, 13565-905 Sao˜ Carlos, SP, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Received 21 November 2001 Published 8 January 2002 Online at stacks.iop.org/JOptB/4/R1 Abstract Seventy five years ago, three remarkable papers by Schrodinger,¨ Kennard and Darwin were published. They were devoted to the evolution of Gaussian wave packets for an oscillator, a free particle and a particle moving in uniform constant electric and magnetic fields. From the contemporary point of view, these packets can be considered as prototypes of the coherent and squeezed states, which are, in a sense, the cornerstones of modern quantum optics. Moreover, these states are frequently used in many other areas, from solid state physics to cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2002.04674V1 [Physics.Optics] 11 Feb 2020 in SRS, the Sensitivity and the Imaging Speed Are Fun- Be Reduced by Using a Laser Beam in a Squeezed State
    Quantum-Enhanced continuous-wave stimulated Raman spectroscopy R. B. Andrade,1 H. Kerdoncuff,2 K. Berg-Srensen,1 T. Gehring,1 M. Lassen,2 and U. L. Andersen1 1Center for Macroscopic Quantum States bigQ, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej 307, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby. 2Danish Fundamental Metrology, Kogle Alle 5, DK-2970, Denmark. Stimulated Raman spectroscopy has become a powerful tool to study the spatiodynamics of molecular bonds with high sensitivity, resolution and speed. However, sensitivity and speed of state- of-the-art stimulated Raman spectroscopy are currently limited by the shot-noise of the light beam probing the Raman process. Here, we demonstrate an enhancement of the sensitivity of continuous- wave stimulated Raman spectroscopy by reducing the quantum noise of the probing light below the shot-noise limit by means of amplitude squeezed states of light. Probing polymer samples with Raman shifts around 2950 cm−1 with squeezed states, we demonstrate a quantum-enhancement of the stimulated Raman signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 3:60 dB relative to the shot-noise limited SNR. Our proof-of-concept demonstration of quantum-enhanced Raman spectroscopy paves the way for a new generation of Raman microscopes, where weak Raman transitions can be imaged without the use of markers or an increase in the total optical power. I. INTRODUCTION In this article, we demonstrate the quantum enhance- ment of continuous-wave (cw) SRS using amplitude Optical quantum sensing exploits the unique quantum squeezed light. We demonstrate its functionality and correlations of non-classical light to enhance the detec- superiority by spectroscopically measuring the carbon- tion of physical parameters beyond classical means [1{ hydrogen (C-H) vibrations of polymethylmethacrylate 5].
    [Show full text]
  • Squeezed Light for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
    Squeezed Light for Gravitational Wave Astronomy Von der Fakultät für Mathematik und Physik der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften – Dr. rer. nat. – genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl.-Phys. Henning Vahlbruch geboren am 29. Juli 1976 in Frankfurt am Main 2008 Referent: Prof. Dr. Roman Schnabel Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Karsten Danzmann Tag der Promotion: 28.11.2008 Abstract During the recent years an international network of interferometric gravitational wave (GW) detectors has been commissioned and searches for various classes of GW- signals are ongoing. Although the observatories are beginning to reach astrophysically interesting sensitivity levels, extensive upgrades are aimed for the next decade bringing us into the era of gravitational wave astronomy. One approach to enhance the detector sensitivity is the injection of squeezed vacuum states of light replacing the vacuum fluctuations entering the detector through its antisymmetric port. In this thesis the unprecedented generation of squeezed vacuum states with a noise power 6.5 dB below vacuum noise within the entire detection bandwidth of ground-based GW-detectors (10 Hz - 10 kHz) was experimentally demonstrated at a wavelength of 1064 nm. For the first time a coherent control scheme was employed for comprehensive phase control of the experimental setup. This scheme is directly applicable to future GW-detector topologies. In addition, parasitic interference in- duced by scattered light was found to be a dominant noise source degrading squeezed states in the audio band. The compatibility of squeezed field injection into a detuned operated dual-recycled Michelson interferometer was demonstrated in a table top experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Coherent State Path Integral Quantization of Quantum Field Theory
    8 Coherent State Path Integral Quantization of Quantum Field Theory 8.1 Coherent states and path integral quantization. The path integral that we have used so far is a powerful tool butitcan only be used in theories based on canonical quantization. Forexample,it cannot be used in theories of fermions (relativistic or not),amongothers. In this chapter we discuss a more general approach based on theconcept of coherent states. Coherent states, and their application to path integrals, have been widely discussed. Excellent references include the 1975 lectures by Faddeev (Faddeev, 1976), and the books by Perelomov (Perelomov, 1986), Klauder (Klauder and Skagerstam, 1985), and Schulman (Schulman, 1981). The related concept of geometric quantization is insightfully presented in the work by Wiegmann (Wiegmann, 1989). 8.2 Coherent states Let us consider a Hilbert space spanned by a complete set of harmonic oscillator states n ,withn = 0,...,∞.Letˆa† anda ˆ be a pair of creation and annihilation operators acting on this Hilbert space, andsatisfyingthe commutation relations{∣ ⟩} † † † a,ˆ aˆ = 1 , aˆ , aˆ = 0 , a,ˆ aˆ = 0(8.1) These operators generate# $ the harmonic# $ oscillators[ states] n in the usual way, {∣ ⟩} 1 † n n = aˆ 0 , aˆ 0 = 0(8.2) n! where 0 is the vacuum∣ ⟩ state% of& the' oscillator.∣ ⟩ ∣ ⟩ ∣ ⟩ 8.2 Coherent states 215 Let us denote by z the coherent state zaˆ† z¯aˆ ∣ ⟩z = e 0 , z = 0 e (8.3) where z is an arbitrary complex number andz ¯ is the complex conjugate. ∣ ⟩ ∣ ⟩ ⟨ ∣ ⟨ ∣ The coherent state z has the defining property of being a wave packet with optimal spread, i.e.
    [Show full text]