DOCSLIB.ORG

This Table Was Generated on 3/21/21. Amount PAC Independent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This table was generated on 3/21/21. Independent Expenditure Table 1** Independent Expenditure Totals by Committee and Filer Type January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020 Independent Expenditure (IE) Totals by Committee and Filer Type Amount PAC Independent Expenditures* $86,515,604 Party Independent Expenditures $393,499,533 Independent Expenditure-Only Political Committees (Super PACs) $2,019,535,095 Political Committees with Non-Contribution Accounts (Hybrid PACs) $552,212,295 Independent Expenditures Reported by Persons other than Political Committees $91,981,441 Total Independent Expenditures (IE) $3,143,743,967 ID # IEs by Political Action Committee (PAC)* Amount C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND -$10,932 C00739904 21ST CENTURY LEADERSHIP $11,872 C00589507 AAPI VICTORY FUND, INC. $283,909 C00740845 ACTION TOGETHER PAC $14,084 C00746677 ALABAMA SWAMP DRAINERS PAC $6,391 C00032995 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE $28,585 C00648899 AMERICA'S CONSTITUTION PAC $8,996 C00196246 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC POLITICAL COMMITTEE (OPHTHPAC) $18,389 C00173153 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (CR $479,320 C00364158 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OB-GYNS PAC (OB-GYN PAC) $400,017 C00343459 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $169,030 C00279562 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AFL-CIO PAC $21,253 C00011114 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $10,233,371 C00520312 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS GUILD, LOCAL 1931 SAN DIEGO AND GROSSMON $3,089 C00106146 AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC $1,659,685 C00000422 AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $344,800 C00753673 AMERICAN VETERANS FOR THE HOME FRONT $6,646 C00346239 ARAB AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $9,467 C00755116 ARTISTS FOR A MORE PEACEFUL AMERICA $5,159 C00564401 ASHEVILLE TEA PAC $138 C00010421 ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ABC $5,736 C00659490 BALDWIN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE $11,269 C00733261 BOOKER FOR THE PEOPLE, LTD $75,000 C00365536 CHC BOLD PAC $1,969,760 C00758698 CHINESE AMERICAN REPUBLICANS INC $13,735 C00757393 CITIZENS FOR VOTING EQUITY $29,730 C00295527 CITIZENS UNITED POLITICAL VICTORY FUND $435,500 C00432260 CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC $577,760 C00746867 COMMITTEE FOR ADVANCING FREEDOM $50,685 C00743146 COMMITTEE TO ELECT ROBERT J. LOVERO $61,683 C00503870 COMMONWEALTH VALUES PAC $98,752 C00002089 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA-COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITT $55,708 C00147512 CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS PAC $1,069,078 C00513176 CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC $1,086,331 C00495010 CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $5,308 C00010363 CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $566,734 C00524454 CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY FUND $100,000 C00756510 CONSERVATIVE VOICES OF ARIZONA $8,390 This table was generated on 3/21/21. C00007880 CULAC THE PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION $1,850,176 C00032979 D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF T $66,043 C00491050 DAVIS DEMOCRATIC CLUB $939 C00419978 DEFEAT BAD LEADERS 2020 $16,106 C00699041 DEFEAT I.O. PAC $472 C00370007 DEMOCRACY FOR AMERICA $28,919 C00407866 DEMOCRATIC ACTION CLUB OF CHICO $8,125 C00407262 DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE FOR ACTION $24,808 C00743138 DEMOCRATIC CITIZENS OF BERWYN $6,352 C00563254 DEMOCRATIC JEWISH OUTREACH PA $27,467 C00399444 DEMOCRATIC WOMEN OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY $350 C00419283 DEMOCRATS OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY $2,136 C00427575 EASTERN WASHINGTON VOTERS $1,058 C00483412 EL DORADO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $65 C00607374 ELBERT GUILLORY'S AMERICA $1,991,117 C00094573 ELECT - THE PAC OF THE ALABAMA FARMERS FEDERATION $20,748 C00426122 EMPOWERING EACH COMMUNITY PAC $14,800 C00573261 END CITIZENS UNITED $14,205,955 C00442897 EQUALITY CINCINNATI POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $18 C00550970 EQUALITY PAC $512,244 C00757500 ERNIE AND DEBBIE $8,373 C00753632 FACTPAC $5,525 C00307777 FREEDOM CLUB FEDERAL PAC $47,580 C00401786 FREEDOM'S DEFENSE FUND $31,025 C00694943 FRIENDS OF MIA LOVE PAC $65,305 C00100289 GEORGIA MINING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,800 C00750927 GOTV PINELLAS $1,650 C00354605 GRASS ROOTS NORTH CAROLINA/FORUM FOR FIREARMS EDUC POL VICTORY FUND $11,789 C00692715 HELP ELECT REPUBLICANS NOW $16,252 C00536615 HINDU AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,150 C00704593 HOLD THE HOUSE PAC $36,529 C00390526 HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION ACTION PAC $2,000 C00552851 HOUSE FREEDOM FUND $3,765,274 C00740001 HUMANITY FIRST FOR ILLINOIS PAC $93 C00193441 ILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ACTIVATOR POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT FUND (FE $55,124 C00430280 IMMIGRANTS' LIST $15,140 C00692020 IMPEACH $9,566 C00757716 INDIANA FOR A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT $5,350 C00003632 INT'L UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS $37,182 C00632562 INTEGRITY FIRST PAC $384,904 C00029447 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND E $324,052 C00007542 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WOR $65,000 C00162818 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 COMMITTEE ON $92,344 C00176214 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION -- POLITICAL ACTION FUND $53,326 C00000885 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHE $48,267 C00320432 IRISH AMERICAN DEMOCRATS $4,250 C00299396 ITALIAN AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP COUNCIL $6,072 C00536540 JOBS, FREEDOM, AND SECURITY PAC $109,788 C00175521 KANSANS FOR LIFE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $86,241 C00285783 KANSAS FARM BUREAU VOTERS ORG/ELECT FARM BUREAU FRIENDS FUND (KS FARM B $4,293 This table was generated on 3/21/21. C00737197 KEEP FLORIDA RED $4,000 C00689356 KEEPING AMERICA GREAT PAC $59,100 C00236489 KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (KOCHPAC) $231 C00007922 LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC $534,019 C00499863 LEADERSHIP CONNECTICUT PAC $7,402 C00632398 LET AMERICA VOTE PAC $137,320 C00747980 LET'S GET COLORADO BACK TO BUSINESS $33,605 C00692327 LETS GET TO WORK PAC $315,960 C00625079 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF ARKANSAS $651 C00480822 LIFE ISSUES FAMILY ETHICS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,039 C00002469 MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION $12,785 C00663211 MAD DOG PAC $173,982 C00247783 MARYLAND RIGHT TO LIFE INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,800 C00753814 MEME PAC $1,759 C00745265 MICHIGAN CHINESE CONSERVATIVE ALLIANCE $15,170 C00300236 MID-ATLANTIC PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE $440 C00129171 MINNESOTA CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE, INC. FEDERAL PAC $69,437 C00613489 MISSOURI FARM BUREAU FEDERATION FEDERAL PAC $19,859 C00157958 MISSOURI RIGHT TO LIFE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10,824 C00290866 MISSOURI SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (MO SOYPAC) $200 C00586255 MONUMENT STRATEGIES PAC $1,000 C00504233 NAPA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $75 C00481200 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC PAC $32,010 C00023580 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS OF U.S.A. POLITICAL FUND (LETTER CAR $21,432 C00030718 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,992,302 C00172296 NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO PRESERVE SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE PAC $28,426 C00140061 NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE / AMERICAN COLLEG $30,000 C00101105 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COM $180,000 C00358051 NATIONAL PRO-LIFE ALLIANCE PAC $17,819 C00053553 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND $8,977,849 C00111278 NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $74,413 C00461418 NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS FEDERAL COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDU $187,031 C00738906 NEVADA CONSERVATIVE 2020 PAC $21,000 C00260331 NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE FEDERAL PAC $5,780 C00722835 NEW MISSION LEADERSHIP FUND INC $61,555 C00117200 NORTH CAROLINA RIGHT TO LIFE INC - PAC $632 C00481986 NORTH DAKOTA FARM BUREAU POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7 C00083857 OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $86 C00691725 OHIO CD-04 WATCH $23,362 C00382283 OHLONE AREA UNITED DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN $3,668 C00756031 OUR PRESIDENT $36 C00738542 OWLS FEDERAL PAC $1,562 C00754481 PART THE RED SEA $53 C00172361 PENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION PAC $36,945 C00757047 PENNSYLVANIA VETERANS CONSORTIUM $14,800 C00755579 PINELLAS CITIZENS FOR POSITIVE CHANGE $1,907 C00433318 PLACER COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $969 C00653030 POLICE ACTION FUND $4,389 C00343137 POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOPAEDIC SU $90,000 C00757492 PRO PATRIA $494 This table was generated on 3/21/21. C00202804 PROCHOICE VOTER $7,930 C00440032 PROMOTING OUR REPUBLICAN TEAM PAC $60,000 C00749077 PUBLIC LANDS ACCESS FOR RECREATION PAC $1,505 C00724559 RED WINE AND BLUE PAC $70,656 C00429464 REDWOOD COAST DEMOCRATS $340 C00566059 REMEDY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10,357 C00427849 REPLACEMENTS LTD PAC $11,330 C00296640 REPUBLICAN MAJORITY FUND $32,500 C00753046 REPUBLICAN VOTERS OF TEXAS-PAC $12,810 C00751016 RESTORE OUR REPUBLIC PAC $34,802 C00426528 RHODE ISLAND STATE RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC FEDERAL PAC $652 C00101212 RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,500 C00141572 RIGHT TO LIFE/OREGON PAC $43,087 C00105791 ROCHESTER AREA RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $230 C00686410 ROSEDALE HUDDLE $10,725 C00122101 SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL PAC (SCI-PAC) $190,000 C00716803 SAN FRANCISCO YOUNG DEMOCRATS $400 C00429456 SANTA BARBARA
Recommended publications
  • Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide

    Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide

    Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide The following is a step-by-step guide for caucus night. An additional guide will be printed for caucus chairs, which will provide a further in-depth discussion of all procedures and reporting of caucus activities. If you have questions concerning the procedures contained in this caucus guide, please contact the Iowa Democratic Party at 515-244-7292. Paid for by the Iowa Democratic Party www.iowademocrats.org and not authorized by any federal candidate or candidate’s committee . Produced in-house Monday, February 1, 2016 – 7:00PM Doors open 6:30PM Who Can Participate in the Caucuses? In order to participate in the Iowa Democratic Party’s First-in-the-Nation Caucuses, you must meet the following qualifications: • Be a resident of Iowa and of the precinct in which you wish to participate • Be a U.S. citizen and otherwise eligible voter (18 years old by November 8, 2016) • Register as a Democrat* (you can register at the caucus) • Be in the registration line or signed in by 7:00pm Those who do not meet the above qualifications are allowed to remain at the caucus as an observer. *Iowans who will be 18 years old by Election Day, November 8, 2016, can participate in the caucuses; however, one cannot register to vote in Iowa until he/she is at least 17 ½ years old. Because the caucuses are held February 1, 2016, it is possible an eligible 2016 voter won’t be able to register as a Democrat by February 1, in which case the eligible voter must declare himself/herself a Democrat by signing a form with the Iowa Democratic Party.
  • Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions

    Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 1986 Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions Helen A. Moore University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Hugh P. Whitt University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Sociology Commons Moore, Helen A. and Whitt, Hugh P., "Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions" (1986). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 105. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/105 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in The Sociological Quarterly 27:3 (1986), pp. 423-439. Copyright 1986 by JAI Press, Inc. Published by Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Midwest Sociological Society. Used by permission. Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions Helen A. Moore Hugh P. Whitt University of Nebraska–Lincoln Corresponding author — Helen A . Moore, Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln Nebraska 68588-0324 Abstract The issues raised by the New Political Right and the Moral Majority have over- lapped in recent political history. Researchers have assumed that a single additive scale across conservative issues can identify the base of support for the Moral Majority as an organization. We examine general support for the Moral Majority separately from sup- port for six specific issues: teaching creationism, voluntary public school prayer, mil- itary defense spending, gun control, pornography and abortion.
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's

    Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's

    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
  • The New Right

    The New Right

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration

    The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration

    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
  • Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction

    Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction

    PROTECT CHILDREN NOT GUNS 2019 Mission Statement he Children’s Defense Fund Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a T Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. For over 40 years, CDF has provided a strong, effective and independent voice for all the children of America who cannot vote, lobby or speak for themselves. We pay particular attention to the needs of poor and minority children and those with disabilities. CDF educates the nation about the needs of children and encourages preventive investments before they get sick, drop out of school, get into trouble or suffer family breakdown. © 2019 Children’s Defense Fund. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................... 2 Overview .............................................................. 5 Select Shootings Involving Children in the Past 12 Months. 7 Child and Teen Gun Deaths ..........................................11 Child and Teen Gun Injuries .........................................19 International Gun Death Comparisons ..............................23 Progress Since Parkland .............................................29 We Can Do Better: We Must Strengthen Laws to Save Lives. .33 Stand Up and Take Action ...........................................39 Appendices .......................................................... 41 Endnotes ............................................................50 Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction On April 20, 1999, Americans witnessed a once unthinkable and now unforgettable tragedy at Columbine High School. We watched in horror as frightened children fled with their hands up, frantic parents tried to reunite with their children, and traumatized survivors told reporters about the violence they witnessed. It was the first time many of us saw these terrifying scenes. But it was far from the last.
  • Candidates Prepare for Final Showdown

    Candidates Prepare for Final Showdown

    Matawan holds onto lead in Register Top Ten, 1B MONMOUTH COUNTY'S HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER SINCE 1878 ister )AY. NOV 8. 1988 VOL. 111 NO. .13 25 i Lawyer: Hunt Meet Candidates prepare not legal for final showdown By VIRGINIA KEMTDORRI8 bid to topple incumbent U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg. THE REGISTER BySEAMUSMcORAW The latest Eagleton poll, however, gives Lautenberg a THE REGISTER solid 12-point lead over the one-time Heisman Tro- phy winner and Rhodes scholar. MIDDLETOWN — The state On the congressional level, the race to fill How- Attorney General's Office will Politicians and campaign workers spent much of ard's seat — in which Libertarian Laura Stewart it look into whether the annual Hunt yesterday in a last-minute push before today's general also a candidate — has drawn national attention, in Race Meet operates legally be- election. pan because it is one of the few seats nationwide with cause of inquiries made by local "We've been out all weekend," said Wendy Do- no incumbent. attorney Larry S. Loigman. nath, a spokesman for 3rd Congressional District The picture is further complicated by the fact that Loigman, who has vowed to hopeful Joseph Azzolina. with Howard's death and the resignation of Demo- "make sure that this year's hunt is Azzolina is hoping to top Democratic state Sen. cratic Rep. Peter Rodino of Newark, the state's pres- the last one," last month contacted Frank Pallone in the race to fill the seat left vacant by tige level in Congress is reported to be on the decline.
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement

    Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement

    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
  • Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R

    Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R

    The original documents are located in Box D37, folder “Ford Broadcasts, 1967-1968” of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. ~ REPUBliCAN GONGRES.SIONAl NEWS BUREAU 312 CONGRESSIONAL HOTEL • WASHINGTON, D. C. 20003 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE LINCOLN 4-301 0 Monday, F\!bruary 27, 1967 Acting on the heels of a House Special Committee racommcndation of censure and other penaltbs for Rep. Adem Clayton Powell (D. of N.Y.), some 30 freshmen House Re- publicans today proposed legislation to set up permanent House machinery to deal with unethical conduct of tvbmbers, officers and employees. Led by Rep. George Bush of Taxes, the R,3publican Congressmen sponsored Hous3 Resolutions to establish o Select Committee on Standards and Conduct and to provide, among other things, 11 full disclosura of assets, liabilities, honorariums, etc., by Members, their spouses and staff members whose salaries exceed $15,000 gross annually ..
  • The Christian Coalition in the Life Cycle of the Religious Right

    The Christian Coalition in the Life Cycle of the Religious Right

    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1997 Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right Kathleen S Espin University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Espin, Kathleen S, "Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right" (1997). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 3321. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/CQHQ-ABU5 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text direct^ from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiic^ udnle others may be fix>m any type o f computer printer. The qnalityr of this reproduction is dependent npon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversety afikct reproduction.
  • Issue Background Over the Past Several Years, Gun Violence

    Issue Background Over the Past Several Years, Gun Violence

    Gun Violence Prevention Background NFTY Mechina 2015 Issue Background Over the past several years, gun violence prevention has once again been at the forefront of North American political discourse, spurred in large part by the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the Navy Yard shooting in Washington, D.C., and the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, among others. The costs of gun violence in the United States are staggering: Consider these numbers: 8: Each day, eight young Americans under age 19 die from gun violence. 12: The rate of gun deaths among America’s children is 12 times higher than those of the 25 other wealthiest nations combined. 30,000: Over 30,000 Americans die each year from gun violence. $100 Billion: The estimated medical and social cost of gun violence in America, every single year. Nearly 80% of this cost is borne by taxpayers. The vast majority of Americans, even gun owners, support common sense gun safety measures. According to the National Opinion Research Center, 75% of gun owners support mandatory registration of handguns, as does 85% of the general public. 66% of gun owners and 80% of the general public favor mandatory background checks in private handgun sales, such as gun shows. However, some Americans believe that such gun control measures are unnecessary, ineffective, and contrary to the wording and spirit of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states, “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) argue that law-abiding citizens, like hunters and sportsmen, will suffer the most under restrictive gun control laws, while criminals will always be able to access guns no matter what restrictions or gun control measures are enacted.
  • INTERSPECIES SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Intersectional Empathetic Approaches to Food and Climate Justice

    INTERSPECIES SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Intersectional Empathetic Approaches to Food and Climate Justice

    1 INTERSPECIES SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: intersectional empathetic approaches to food and climate justice A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Policy and Governance at the University of Canterbury Éilis Rose Espiner i “He aroha whakatō, he aroha puta mai” (where kindness is sown, kindness will be received) ii Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. v Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 0 What is Sustainable Development? .................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................ 2 Theory ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter one: environmental impacts of current food system ............................................................. 11 Inefficient consumption patterns ..................................................................................................... 11 Resource-intensive ...........................................................................................................................