DOCSLIB.ORG

Brucellosis in Humans and Animals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brucellosis in Humans and Animals Brucellosis in humans and animals Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Brucellosis in humans and animals Brucellosis in humans and animals Brucellosis in humans and animals 92 4 154713 8 Brucellosis in humans and animals Brucellosis in humans and animals World Organisation for Animal Health i WHO/CDS/EPR/2006.7 Brucellosis in humans and animals Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Organisation for Animal Health Brucellosis in humans and animals ii WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Brucellosis in humans and animals. Produced by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Organisation for Animal Health Principal author: M.J. Corbel. 1.Brucellosis - prevention and control. 2.Brucellosis - epidemiology. 3.Brucellosis - complications. 4.Guidelines. I.Corbel, M.J. II.World Health Organization. III.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. IV.World Organisation for Animal Health. ISBN 92 4 154713 8 (NLM classification: WC 310) ISBN 978 92 4 154713 0 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication. iii Contents Principal author, list of contributors .......................................................................................................... vii Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................................................. ix 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. CLINICAL MANIFESTATION .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The disease in humans ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Osteoarticular complications .................................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Gastrointestinal complications ............................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Hepatobiliary complications .................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Respiratory tract complications .............................................................................. 7 2.1.5 Genitourinary complications .................................................................................... 7 2.1.6 Pregnancy and breastfeeding .................................................................................. 7 2.1.7 Cardiovascular complications ................................................................................. 8 2.1.8 Neurological complications ..................................................................................... 8 2.1.9 Cutaneous complications ........................................................................................ 8 2.1.10 Opthalmic complications......................................................................................... 9 2.1.11 Chronic brucellosis .................................................................................................. 9 2.1.12 Childhood brucellosis ............................................................................................ 10 Î Key points on the disease in humans ...................................................................... 10 2.2 The disease in animals..................................................................................................... 10 Î Key points on the disease in animals ...................................................................... 12 3. EPIDEMIOLOGY ............................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Epidemiology of brucellosis in humans.......................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Reservoirs of infection .......................................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Transmission of brucellosis to humans ................................................................ 14 3.1.3 Seasonal factors ................................................................................................... 17 3.1.4 Age and sex distribution ........................................................................................ 17 3.1.5 Travel-acquired brucellosis ................................................................................... 17 3.1.6 Bio-terrorism ......................................................................................................... 18 Î Key points on the epidemiology of brucellosis in humans ..................................... 19 3.2 Epidemiology of brucellosis in animals .......................................................................... 19 Î Key points on the epidemiology of brucellosis in animals ..................................... 21 Brucellosis in humans and animals iv 4. DIAGNOSIS ............................................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Diagnosis in humans........................................................................................................ 22 4.1.1 Bacteriological diagnosis ...................................................................................... 22 4.1.2 Serological diagnosis ............................................................................................ 24 4.1.3 Diagnostics of Brucella meningitis and meningoencephalitis .............................. 27 4.1.4 Intradermal tests ................................................................................................... 27 4.1.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 27 Î Key points on the diagnosis in humans ................................................................... 28 4.2 Diagnosis in animals ........................................................................................................ 28 4.2.1 Bacteriological methods........................................................................................ 29 4.2.2 Serological methods.............................................................................................. 30 4.2.3 Supplementary tests ............................................................................................. 32 4.3 Remarks on the diagnosis of brucellosis in other species than cattle ........................ 33 4.3.1 Sheep and goats .................................................................................................... 33 4.3.2 Pigs ........................................................................................................................ 34 4.3.3 Camels, buffalo, reindeer, yaks ............................................................................. 34 4.3.4 Dogs ....................................................................................................................... 35 Î Key points on the diagnosis in animals ................................................................... 35 5. TREATMENT OF BRUCELLOSIS IN HUMANS .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Francisella Spp. Infections in Farmed and Wild Fish. ICES CM 2008/D:07
    ICES CM 2008/D:07 Francisella spp. infections in farmed and wild fish Duncan J. Colquhoun1, Adam Zerihun2 and Jarle Mikalsen3 National Veterinary Institute, Section for Fish Health, Ullevaalsveien 68, 0454 Oslo, Norway 1 tel: +47 23 21 61 41; fax: +47 23 21 61 01; e-mail: [email protected] 2 tel: +47 23 21 61 08; fax: +47 23 21 61 01; e-mail: [email protected] 3 tel: +47 23 21 61 55; fax: +47 23 21 61 01; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Bacteria within the genus Francisella are non-motile, Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, facultatively intracellular cocco-bacilli. While the genus includes pathogens of warm-blooded animals including humans, and potential bioterror agents, there is also increasing evidence of a number of as yet unrecognised environmental species. Due to their nutritionally fastidious nature, bacteria of the genus Francisella are generally difficult to culture, and growth is also commonly inhibited by the presence of other bacteria within sample material. For these reasons, Francisella-related fish disease may be under-diagnosed. Following the discovery in 2004/2005 that a granulomatous disease in farmed and wild Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) is caused by a previously undescribed member of this genus (Francisella philomiragia subsp. noatunensis), similar diseases have been identified in fish in at least seven countries around the world. These infections affect both freshwater and marine fish species and involve bacteria more or less closely related to F. philomiragia subsp. philomiragia, an opportunistic human pathogen. Recent work relating to characterisation of the disease/s, classification of fish pathogenic Francisella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable Diseases and Conditions
    KINGS COUNTY DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC HEALTH 330 CAMPUS DRIVE, HANFORD, CA 93230 REPORTABLE DISEASES AND CONDITIONS Title 17, California Code of Regulations, §2500, requires that known or suspected cases of any of the diseases or conditions listed below are to be reported to the local health jurisdiction within the specified time frame: REPORT IMMEDIATELY BY PHONE During Business Hours: (559) 852-2579 After Hours: (559) 852-2720 for Immediate Reportable Disease and Conditions Anthrax Escherichia coli: Shiga Toxin producing (STEC), Rabies (Specify Human or Animal) Botulism (Specify Infant, Foodborne, Wound, Other) including E. coli O157:H7 Scrombroid Fish Poisoning Brucellosis, Human Flavivirus Infection of Undetermined Species Shiga Toxin (Detected in Feces) Cholera Foodborne Disease (2 or More Cases) Smallpox (Variola) Ciguatera Fish Poisoning Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Tularemia, human Dengue Virus Infection Influenza, Novel Strains, Human Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (Crimean-Congo, Ebola, Diphtheria Measles (Rubeola) Lassa, and Marburg Viruses) Domonic Acid Poisoning (Amnesic Shellfish Meningococcal Infections Yellow Fever Poisoning) Novel Virus Infection with Pandemic Potential Zika Virus Infection Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning Plague (Specify Human or Animal) Immediately report the occurrence of any unusual disease OR outbreaks of any disease. REPORT BY PHONE, FAX, MAIL WITHIN ONE (1) WORKING DAY Phone: (559) 852-2579 Fax: (559) 589-0482 Mail: 330 Campus Drive, Hanford 93230 Conditions may also be reported electronically via the California
    [Show full text]
  • Illness Reporting Log for Temporary Events and Volunteers
    1020 6th Street SE Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 PH: 319-892-6000 www.linncounty.org/603/Food-Safety REPORTING OF ILLNESS FORM Worker Sign-in Sheet The purpose of this form is to inform food workers of their responsibility to notify the person in charge when they experience any of the health conditions listed below. The person in charge must take appropriate steps to prevent the transmission of foodborne illness. I AGREE TO REPORT TO THE PERSON IN CHARGE: Any onset of the following symptoms, either while at work or outside of work, including the onset date: 1. Diarrhea 2. Vomiting 3. Jaundice 4. Sore throat with fever 5. Infected cuts or wounds, or lesions containing pus on the hand, wrist , an exposed body part, or other body part and the cuts, wounds, or lesions are not properly covered (such as boils and infected wounds, however small) Medical Diagnosis: Whenever diagnosed as being ill with Norovirus, typhoid fever (Salmonella Typhi), non-typhoidal Salmonella, shigellosis (Shigella spp. infection), Escherichia coil 0157:H7 or other Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) or Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection or Hepatitis A (hepatitis A virus infection) Exposure to Foodborne Pathogens: 1. Exposure to or suspicion of causing any confirmed disease outbreak of Norovirus, typhoid fever, shigellosis, E. coli 0157:H7 or other Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) or Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection, or Hepatitis A. 2. A household member diagnosed with Norovirus, typhoid fever, shigellosis, E. coli 0157:H7 or other Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) or Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection, or Hepatitis A. 3. A household member attending or working in a setting experiencing a confirmed disease outbreak of Norovirus, typhoid fever, shigellosis, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Veterinary Standard Precautions for Zoonotic Disease Prevention in Veterinary Personnel
    Compendium of Veterinary Standard Precautions for Zoonotic Disease Prevention in Veterinary Personnel National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians Veterinary Infection Control Committee 2010 Preface.............................................................................................................................................................. 1405 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 1405 A. OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................................... 1405 B. BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 1405 C. CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................................................... 1405 II. ZOONOTIC DISEASE TRANSMISSION................................................................................................ 1406 A. SOURCE ............................................................................................................................................ 1406 B. HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY.................................................................................................................... 1406 C. ROUTES OF TRANSMISSION........................................................................................................... 1406 1. CONTACT TRANSMISSION.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herd Health Protocols for Dromedary Camels (Camelus Dromedarius) at Mpala Ranch and Research Centre, Laikipia County, Kenya
    Herd Health Protocols for Dromedary Camels (Camelus dromedarius) at Mpala Ranch and Research Centre, Laikipia County, Kenya September 23rd, 2012 Andrew Springer Browne, MVB Veterinary Public Health Program University of Missouri – Columbia, USA Sharon Deem, DVM, PhD, DACZM Institute for Conservation Medicine Saint Louis Zoo, St. Louis, MO, USA This guide was made to solidify husbandry and record protocols as well as give feasible advice for common health problems in camels at the Mpala Ranch and Research Centre. For thorough reviews of camel diseases and health, see “A Field Manual of Camel Diseases” by Kohler-­­Rollefson and “Medicine and Surgery of Camelids” by Fowler. Acknowledgments Many thanks to Margaret Kinnaird and Mike Littlewood for their patience and support during our visit. Thank you to Laura Budd and Sina Mahs for their incredible help and time dedicated to the project. Finally, a special thanks to S. Moso, Eputh, Abduraman, Adow, Abdulai, Ekomoel, and Ewoi for working and living with the camels every day. Asante sana. -­­ Springer and Sharon ii Table of Contents Page Key Management Goals 1 Record Keeping 2 Electronic and Paper Records 3 Entering Data into Excel Database 4 Excel Database Legend 5 Husbandry 6 Calf Care 7 Maternal Rejection 8 Dam Care 9 Branding and Identification 10 Weight Estimates/Body Condition Scoring 11 Milking Schedule and Boma Rotation 12 Veterinary Care 13 Preventive Veterinary Health Care 14 Diagnostics 15 Abortion 16 Skin Wounds 17 Abscess Treatment 18 Mastitis 19 Eye Problems 20 Diseases of Special
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of REPORTABLE COMMUNICABLE DISEASES in BC July 2009
    LIST OF REPORTABLE COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN BC July 2009 Schedule A: Reportable by all sources, including Laboratories Meningococcal Disease, All Invasive including “Primary Meningococcal Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Pneumonia” and “Primary Meningococcal Anthrax Conjunctivitis” Botulism Mumps Brucellosis Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Infection Chancroid Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) Cholera Pertussis (Whooping Cough) Congenital Infections: Plague Toxoplasmosis Poliomyelitis Rubella Rabies Cytomegalovirus Reye Syndrome Herpes Simplex Rubella Varicella-Zoster Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Hepatitis B Virus Smallpox Listeriosis and any other congenital infection Streptococcus pneumoniae Infection, Invasive Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease Syphilis Cryptococcal infection Tetanus Cryptosporidiosis Transfusion Transmitted Infection Cyclospora infection Tuberculosis Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis Tularemia Diphtheria: Typhoid Fever and Paratyphoid Fever Cases Waterborne Illness Carriers All causes Encephalitis: West Nile Virus Infection Post-infectious Yellow Fever Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis Vaccine-related Viral Schedule B: Reportable by Laboratories only Foodborne illness: All causes All specific bacterial and viral stool pathogens: Gastroenteritis epidemic: (i) Bacterial: Bacterial Campylobacter Parasitic Salmonella Viral Shigella Genital Chlamydia Infection Yersinia Giardiasis (ii) Viral Gonorrhea – all sites Amoebiasis Group A Streptococcal Disease, Invasive Borrelia burgdorferi infection H5 and H7 strains of the
    [Show full text]
  • Genital Brucella Suis Biovar 2 Infection of Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa) Hunted in Tuscany (Italy)
    microorganisms Article Genital Brucella suis Biovar 2 Infection of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Hunted in Tuscany (Italy) Giovanni Cilia * , Filippo Fratini , Barbara Turchi, Marta Angelini, Domenico Cerri and Fabrizio Bertelloni Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy; fi[email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (B.T.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (F.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Brucellosis is a zoonosis caused by different Brucella species. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) could be infected by some species and represents an important reservoir, especially for B. suis biovar 2. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Brucella spp. by serological and molecular assays in wild boar hunted in Tuscany (Italy) during two hunting seasons. From 287 animals, sera, lymph nodes, livers, spleens, and reproductive system organs were collected. Within sera, 16 (5.74%) were positive to both rose bengal test (RBT) and complement fixation test (CFT), with titres ranging from 1:4 to 1:16 (corresponding to 20 and 80 ICFTU/mL, respectively). Brucella spp. DNA was detected in four lymph nodes (1.40%), five epididymides (1.74%), and one fetus pool (2.22%). All positive PCR samples belonged to Brucella suis biovar 2. The results of this investigation confirmed that wild boar represents a host for B. suis biovar. 2 and plays an important role in the epidemiology of brucellosis in central Italy. Additionally, epididymis localization confirms the possible venereal transmission. Citation: Cilia, G.; Fratini, F.; Turchi, B.; Angelini, M.; Cerri, D.; Bertelloni, Keywords: Brucella suis biovar 2; wild boar; surveillance; epidemiology; reproductive system F.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Services Newsletter August 2017
    August 2017 Veterinary Services Newsletter August 2017 Wildlife Health Laboratory Veterinary Services Staff NALHN Certification: The Wildlife Health Laboratory has been working towards joining the National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NALHN) in order to have ac- cess to all CWD testing kits. The commercial test kits for CWD are now restricted, and Branch Supervisor/Wildlife only NALHN approved laboratories have access to all the kits that are currently availa- Veterinarian: Dr. Mary ble. To be considered for the program, our laboratory must meet the ISO 17025 stand- Wood ards of quality control that assure our laboratory is consistently and reliably producing Laboratory Supervisor: accurate results. In addition, our laboratory will be regularly inspected by APHIS Veter- Hank Edwards inary Services, and we will be required to complete annual competency tests. Although we have been meeting most of the ISO standards for several years, applying to the Senior Lab Scientist: NAHLN has encouraged us to tighten many of our procedures and quality control moni- Hally Killion toring. We hope to have the application submitted by the middle of August and we have our first APHIS inspection in September. Senior Lab Scientist: Jessica Jennings-Gaines Brucellosis Lab Assistant: New CWD area for elk: The Wildlife Health Laboratory confirmed the first case of Kylie Sinclair CWD in an elk from hunt area 48. This animal was captured in elk hunt area 33 as part of the elk movement study in the Bighorns to study Brucellosis. She was found dead in Wildlife Disease Specialist: hunt area 48, near the very southeastern corner of Washakie County.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Relatedness of Brucella Spp. and Ochrobactrum Anthropi and Description of Ochrobactrum Intermedium Sp
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Dadun, University of Navarra International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology (1 998), 48, 759-768 Printed in Great Britain Evaluation of the relatedness of Brucella spp. and Ochrobactrum anthropi and description of Ochrobactrum intermedium sp. nov., a new species with a closer relationship to Brucella SPP. Julian Velasco,’ Conchi Romero,’ lgnacio Lopez-Got%,’ Jose Leiva,2 Ramon Diaz1f2and lgnacio Moriydn’ Author for correspondence : Ignacio Moriyon. Tel : + 34 48 425600. Fax : + 34 48 425649. e-mail : [email protected] Departamento de The relatedness of Brucella spp. and Ochrobactrum anthropi was studied by M icrob io I og ia, Un ive rs id ad protein profiling, Western blot, immunoelectrophoresis and 16s rRNA analysis. de Navarra, Aptdo 1771 and Servicio de Microbiologia, Whole-cell and soluble proteins of brucellae and 0. anthropi showed Clinica Universitaria de serological cross-reactivities quantitatively and qualitatively more intense Navarraz, Pamplona, Spain than those existing with similar extracts of Agrobacterium spp. Numerical analysis of Western blot profiles of whole-cell extracts showed that 0. anthropi LMG 3301 was closer to Brucella spp. than to 0. anthropi LMG 3331T, a result not obtained by protein profiling. These differences were not observed by Western blot with soluble fractions, and immunoelectrophoretic analyses suggested that this was due to destruction of conformational epitopes in Western blot procedures with the subsequent simplification of antigenic profile. Analysis of the 165 rRNA sequences of strains previously used in the species definition confirmed that strain LMG 3301, and also LMG 3306, were closer to the brucellae, and that LMG 3331Twas in a separate cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioinformatics Resource Centers Systems Biology (Brcs) Centers
    Fondation Merieux – J Craig Venter Institute Bioinformatics Workshop December 5 – 8, 2017 Module 3: Genomic Data & Sequence Annotations in Public Databases NIH/NIAID Genomics and Bioinformatics Program SlideSource:A.S.Fauci SlideSource:A.S.Fauci Conducts and supports basic and applied research to better understand, treat, and ultimately prevent infectious, immunologic, and allergic diseases. NIAIDGenomicsProgram Proteomics Systems Sequencing Functional Structural Biology Genomics Genomics Genomic Clinical Functional Systems Sequencing Proteomics Structural Genomic Biology Centers Centers Genomics Research Centers Centers Centers Bioinformatics BioinformaticsResource Centers GenomicResearchResources Genomic/OmicsDataSets,Databases,BioinformaticsTools,Biomarkers,3DStructures,ProteinClones,PredictiveModels Toaddresskeyquestionsin microbiologyandinfectious disease NIAID Genome Sequencing Center Influenza Genome Sequencing Project at JCVI • 2004: 80 influenza genomes in GenBank • 3OCT2017: ~20,000 influenza genomes sequenced at JCVI • 75% complete influenza genomes in GenBank by JCVI Slide source: Maria Giovanni * Genome Sequencing Centers Bioinformatics Resource Centers Systems Biology (BRCs) Centers Structure Genomics Centers Clinical Proteomics Centers Courtesy of Alison Yao, DMID *Bioinformatics Resource Centers (BRCs) Goal: Provide integrated bioinformatics resources in support of basic and applied infectious diseases research • Data and metadata management and integration solutions • Computational analysis and visualization tools • Work
    [Show full text]
  • Francisella Tularensis Subspecies Holarctica and Tularemia in Germany
    microorganisms Review Francisella tularensis Subspecies holarctica and Tularemia in Germany 1, 2, 3 1 1 Sandra Appelt y, Mirko Faber y , Kristin Köppen , Daniela Jacob , Roland Grunow and Klaus Heuner 3,* 1 Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens (ZBS 2), Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (R.G.) 2 Gastrointestinal Infections, Zoonoses and Tropical Infections (Division 35), Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] 3 Cellular Interactions of Bacterial Pathogens, ZBS 2, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-301-8754-2226 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 18 September 2020; Published: 22 September 2020 Abstract: Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by Francisella tularensis a small, pleomorphic, facultative intracellular bacterium. In Europe, infections in animals and humans are caused mainly by Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica. Humans can be exposed to the pathogen directly and indirectly through contact with sick animals, carcasses, mosquitoes and ticks, environmental sources such as contaminated water or soil, and food. So far, F. tularensis subsp. holarctica is the only Francisella species known to cause tularemia in Germany. On the basis of surveillance data, outbreak investigations, and literature, we review herein the epidemiological situation—noteworthy clinical cases next to genetic diversity of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains isolated from patients. In the last 15 years, the yearly number of notified cases of tularemia has increased steadily in Germany, suggesting that the disease is re-emerging.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Borne Diseases in the Pacific Region
    ExamplesExamples ofof DiseasesDiseases AAssociatedssociated withwith WaterborneWaterborne TransmissionTransmission inin thethe PacificPacific IslandIsland RegionRegion Second Seminar on Water Management in Islands Coastal and Isolated Areas Noumea, New Caledonia, 26-28 May 2008 François FAO Public Health Surveillance and Communicable Disease Control Section Secretariat of the Pacific Community OutbreaksOutbreaks ofof communicablecommunicable diseasesdiseases withwith waterwater playingplaying aa potentialpotential oror majormajor rolerole inin thethe transmissiontransmission CholeraCholera TyphoidTyphoid feverfever LeptospirosisLeptospirosis MinistersMinisters ofof HealthHealth CommitmentCommitment ¾¾ YanucaYanuca (1995):(1995): ConceptConcept ofof ““healthyhealthy islandsislands”” == ecologicalecological modelmodel ofof healthhealth promotion.promotion. ““ HealthyHealthy islandsislands shouldshould bebe placesplaces where:where: z ChildrenChildren areare nurturednurtured inin bodybody andand mindmind z EnvironmentsEnvironments inviteinvite learninglearning andand leisureleisure z PeoplePeople workwork andand ageage withwith dignitydignity z EcologicalEcological balancebalance isis sourcesource ofof pridepride”” WhatWhat isis thethe PPHSN?PPHSN? ¾ PPHSNPPHSN isis aa voluntaryvoluntary networknetwork ofof countries/territoriescountries/territories andand institutions/institutions/ organisationsorganisations ¾ DedicatedDedicated toto thethe promotionpromotion ofof publicpublic healthhealth surveillancesurveillance && responseresponse ¾
    [Show full text]