DOCSLIB.ORG

Vuosaari Channel (11.0 M) 14.11.2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vuosaari Channel (11.0 M) 14.11.2011 FAIRWAY CARD 26.3.2010 VUOSAARI CHANNEL (11.0 M) 14.11.2011 FAIRWAY DATA Channel alignment and marking: The Vuosaari channel (11.0 m) starts E of Helsinki Lighthouse and continues northwards past Eestiluoto to Vuosaari harbour. Length approx. 31.8 km/17.2 nm. Three lines marked with boards. Lateral marking. Lit. Fairway dimensions: Design ship: l = 230 m, b = 33 m, t = 11.0 m. Maximum authorised draught 11.0 m. Safe clearance depths: in the approach -13.0 m, in the entrance 12.5 m. Minimum width 199 m. Design speed from Östra Rödhällen to the harbour 10 knots. Anchorage and special areas: In the approach there is an anchorage area NW of Helsinki Lighthouse. When anchoring the instructions given by the pilot or the VTS centre must be followed. Areas where the channel has been widened South of Eesti- luoto and west of Musta Hevonen. There is a permanent meeting and overtaking prohibition in the northern part of the Vuosaari channel, between latitudes 60º11.1’N and 60º12.5’N. This prohibition does not apply to meeting and overtaking situations in which one of the vessels is a tug. The organization of vessel traffic departing from Vuosaari Harbour includes a procedure for issuing clearance for departure. FAIRWAY NAVIGABILITY Navigation conditions: The approach is at open sea and is unsheltered against E-S-W winds. From Eestiluoto to the harbour the channel is protected by islands and skerries. Ice conditions: Ice usually causes problems only in the harbour basins, where slush may make manoeuvring difficult. Occa- sional ice ridging in the areas S and N of Eestiluoto. TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS (channel and harbour) Speed limits and recommendations: In the Vuosaari channel there is a speed limit of 30 km/h in force between Östra Rödhällen and Krokholmshället and the speed limit in force between Krokholmshället and the Vuosaari harbour area is 17 km/h. During the winter season (1 November - 31 March) a speed limit of 24/h will be in force (in the channel) between Krokholmshället and Vuosaari Harbour. Wind recommendations: The maximum wind speed is 15 m/s for vessels over 200 m in length. Visibility: Minimum visibility for all vessels 300 m. Minimum visibility for vessels of more than 200 m in length, 1.0 nautical mile. VESSEL TRAFFIC SERVICES Pilot order: E-mail: pilotorder.south(at)finnpilot.fi. Order form www.pilotorder.fi. Telephone: +358 20754 6151, fax: +358 20754 6161. Pilot boarding position 60°04,96' N / 25°09,79' E. Pilotage distance 9 nm. VTS: Helsinki VTS, VHF channel 71. Tel.: +358 204 48 5391 fax: +358 204 48 5380. Tug boats: Privately owned tugs available. HARBOUR Quays: Quay A: length 222 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m, ramp; Extension of quay A (towards the breakwater): 128 m; Quay B: length 243 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m, four ramps; Quay BP: 250 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m, From the corner of the quays FC to the ramp edge: 86 m, safe clearance depth 10.5 m, double ramp; Quay CP (pier at Quay C): length 250 m, from the ramp to the horizon 110 m, safe clearance depth 10.5 m, double ramp and ramp; Quay D: length 711 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m; Quay E: length 749 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m; Quay F: length 497 m, safe clearance depth 10.5 m; Quay G: length 162 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m, ramp; Quay G (alongside berth): 189 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m; G-GP1 (pier): length 85 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m, two ramps; Quay GP1(pier): 204 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m; GP1(pier)-GP2 (pier): length 86 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m, two ramps; Quay GP2(pier): length 204 m, safe clearance depth 12.5 m; GP2 pier edge: length 29 m, ramp. Cargo handling: Quay D: container crane, lifting capacity 40/50 t, outreach 30 m; 2 container cranes, lifting capacity 40/50 t, outreach 27 m; 2 container cranes, lifting capacity 50/60 t, outreach 38 m. Quay E: 4 container cranes, lifting capacity 65/90 t, outreach 46 m. Quay F: container crane, lifting capacity 40/50 t, outreach 34 m. CONTACT INFORMATION Port of Helsinki, Helsinki Telephone +358 9 310 1621 Fax +358 9 310 33802 E-mail address: [email protected] Granö Vuosaari Harbour Harbour area limit HELSINKI Pikku Niinisaari Krokholmen 1 99 m 17 km/h South Krokholmshället Harbour Musta Hevonen ) Laajasalo (6.1 West Harbour Kuiva ( Hevonen 9) Santa- 30 km/h hamina Östra Rödhällen VUOSAARI 5 m Eestiluoto 5 ) , (9 2 1 - ) = 0 , c 1 S 1 Southern Finland's VUOSAARI 3 ( PENINKARI winter navigation route ITÄTOUKKI ) m 1 5 1 HARMAJA , ( 2 ) 1 6 - . Isosaari 9 = ( c S LÄNSITOUKKI m 0 , Pilot 3 1 - = c S VUOSAARI 1 r u o ) 9 b ( r a H T h o t HRAMTSOW u t h o e S W e e h s t ( t 1 o 1 ) H T a r b o u r VUOSAARI CHANNEL (11.0 M) m ) 0 0 , , 3 1 1 1 - ( = 0 1 2 3 4 5 km c S ) .6 (9 ) Not for navigational use 1 1 ( Sc = safe clearance depth HELSINKI LIGHTHOUSE 14.11.2011 Granö C y a u Q Vuosaari harbour Q u a y Sc-10.5m Mölandet F Q u G a y S a c y u - E 1 Q S 2 c . - 5 1 m 2 .5 Q m u a y D Sc-12.5m A Sc-10.5m y Sc-12.5m ua Q Sc-12.5m Sc-4.5m Harbour area limit (1 1 S , c 0 = ) -1 2 ,5 m Pikku Niinisaari 17 km/h VUOSAARI HARBOUR 0 500 m Not for navigational use Sc = safe clearance depth 7.11.2011.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Porslahdentie Rastböle
    Rastila (M) - Vuosaari (M) - 11.8.2014-14.6.2015 96 Porslahdentie Rastböle (M) - Nordsjö (M) - Porslaxvägen Rastila (M) Porslahdentie Rastböle (M) Porslaxvägen Ma-pe / Må-fr Ma-pe / Må-fr Rastila(M) Vuosaari(M), lait.11 Porslahdentie Vuosaari(M), lait.14 Rastböle(M) > Nordsjö(M), pf.11 Porslaxvägen > Nordsjö(M), pf.14 5.11 5.21 5.14 5.23 5.27 5.37 5.29 5.38 5.43 5.53 5.45 5.54 5.59 6.09 6.01 6.10 6.15 6.25 6.09 6.17 6.23 6.33 6.17 6.25 6.31 6.41 6.25 6.33 6.39 6.49 6.33 6.41 6.47 6.57 6.41 6.49 6.55 7.05 6.49 6.57 7.03 7.13 6.57 7.05 7.11 7.21 7.05 7.13 7.19 7.29 7.13 7.21 7.27 7.37 7.21 7.29 7.35 7.45 7.29 7.37 7.43 7.53 7.37 7.45 80-98A 7.51 8.01 7.45 7.53 80-98A 7.59 8.09 7.53 8.01 8.07 8.17 8.01 8.09 8.15 8.25 8.09 8.17 8.23 8.33 8.17 8.25 8.31 8.41 8.25 8.33 8.39 8.49 8.33 8.41 8.47 8.57 8.41 8.49 8.55 9.05 8.49 8.57 9.03 9.13 8.59 9.09 9.11 9.21 9.09 9.17 9.19 9.29 9.19 9.27 9.35 9.47 9.29 9.37 9.51 10.03 9.39 9.47 9.59 10.11 9.59 10.07 10.16 10.28 10.19 10.27 10.36 10.48 10.39 10.47 10.56 11.08 10.59 11.07 11.16 11.28 11.19 11.27 11.36 11.48 11.39 11.47 11.56 12.08 11.59 12.07 12.16 12.28 12.19 12.27 12.36 12.48 12.39 12.47 12.56 13.08 12.59 13.07 13.16 13.28 13.19 13.27 13.36 13.48 13.39 13.47 13.56 14.08 13.59 14.07 351 96 11.8.2014-14.6.2015 Rastila (M) Porslahdentie Rastböle (M) Porslaxvägen Ma-pe / Må-fr Ma-pe / Må-fr Rastila(M) Vuosaari(M), lait.11 Porslahdentie Vuosaari(M), lait.14 Rastböle(M) > Nordsjö(M), pf.11 Porslaxvägen > Nordsjö(M), pf.14 14.16 14.28 14.19 14.26 14.36 14.46 14.38 14.46 14.44 14.54 14.54 15.02 14.52
    [Show full text]
  • Vuoli Tunnels Finland
    PROJECT SHEET Vuoli Tunnels Finland Construction SKANSKA TEKRA OY/ SKANSKA BS/SIEMENS FINLAND/FINNISH ROAD ENTERPRISE Consulting Engineer KALLIOSUUNNUITTELY ROCPLAN OY LTD. Owner VUOSAARI HARBOUR COMPANY & FINNISH ROAD ADMINISTRATION Products ADMIX C-1000 NF Project Type HARBOR TUNNELS Xypex Admix C-1000 NF played critical role in shotcrete waterproofing of Vuosaari Harbor tunnels. When city planners and engineers began The exposed rock interiors of the road and rail drawing up designs for a new harbor that tunnels were reinforced with deep anchor could relieve the pressure on the Port of Hel- bolts and coated with a base layer of standard sinki, the need for easy access via roads and shotcrete to a thickness of 60 - 80 mm. On rails was a critical requirement. The new USD top of this base layer, a 40 - 60 mm layer of $757 million Vuosaari Harbor, located about shotcrete mixed with Xypex Admix C-1000 NF 15 km northeast of central Helsinki, was built crystalline waterproofing was applied to pro- on 150 hectares (370 acres), which includes vide a permanent seal against moisture intru- 90 hectares that had to be filled in. sion. Finally, a 25 mm layer of standard shot- crete was applied to the innermost surface. The critical port of Helsinki, Finland, could no The new harbor, completed in 2009, can han- longer handle all of the trade that was flowing in dle more than 12 million tons of unitized cargo More than 28,000 kg (61,700 lb) of Xypex Ad- and out of its docks. The decision was made to (e.g., containers, trucks, trailers, etc.) annu- mix was needed to treat the waterproofing build a new, larger port 15 km east of the city in ally.
    [Show full text]
  • BT Vuosaari AP Project Sheet EN OK.Indd
    PROJECT SHEET VUOSAARI HARBOUR CENTRE, HELSINKI, FINLAND AP JETTY 180 M, SIX DOLPHINS AND TWO RAMPS A FEATURES QUANTITIES Client Port of Helsinki Jetty, total length 180 m Location Vuosaari Harbour Centre, Steel bridges 6 steel bridges, Helsinki, Finland each 3 x 24 m Period September 2011 – May 2012 Dolphins 6 concrete dolphins Contractor Terramare Oy Tubular steel piling works D762/610 SCOPE 738 m / 42 piles Construction of a 180 metre long AP jetty, six dolphins and Concrete ramps 2 ramps, each 30 m two ramps. Steel structures 200 tonnes Concrete structures 1,390 m3 MAIN PLANT Floating crane Kahmari 2 Drill barge Pora-Eero Self propelled barge David Piling unit Junttan PM25 B Tugs Koli, Hevi A View of the AP jetty. B View of the Vuosaari Harbour Centre. Work pontoons Paalu, Upi Other plant Grove 635, Volvo L90 Terramare Oy Laurinmäenkuja 3 A INTRODUCTION > PO Box 14, FI–00441 HELSINKI, FINLAND P +358 9 613 621 | F +358 9 6136 2700 www.terramare.fi PAGE 1/2 VUOSAARI HARBOUR CENTRE, HELSINKI, FINLAND AP JETTY 180 M, SIX DOLPHINS AND TWO RAMPS INTRODUCTION The 180 metre long AP jetty, built 180 METRE LONG AP JETTY at Helsinki’s Vuosaari Harbour, Dolphins (6) was implemented on the basis of Terramare’s alternative plan. The A Ramp 30 m jetty increased the harbour’s ca- 12 m pacity with two berths for Ro-Ro cargo vessels. The contract also A Ramp 30 m included two 30 metre wide concrete ramps, built on both sides of the jetty. 24 metre long steel service bridges (6) C CONSTRUCTION OF THE AP JETTY Terramare began the AP jetty contract in September 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Slightly Slummier Area? Negotiations of Place-Bound
    A slightly slummier area? Negotiations of place-bound identities through social spatialisations and unofficial toponyms1 Jani Vuolteenaho, Hanna Lappalainen & Terhi Ainiala University of Helsinki ABSTRACT: In the article, spatialisations (discourses of ideal or stereotyped spaces) are conceptualised as powerful discourses of the surrounding society, providing resources for place-bound identity construction in interaction. We combine a sociolinguistic analysis with Bakhtinian dialogism to understand how such ‘third’ voices in dialogue empower and pluralise self- and other- positionings embedded in the evocations of unofficial place names. Empirically, the focus is on toponyms that divide the socially mixed Vuosaari suburb in Helsinki into ‘older’ and ‘newer’ territories. The results show that when the stereotypes of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ neighbourhoods or other spatialisations interpenetrate the uses of ‘Old’ and ‘New Vuosaari’, they open room for the (re-)voicing of the meanings of these toponyms for highly differentiated social ends. With the Bakhtinian framework bridging between socio-spatial theory and sociolinguistics, the article develops a spatially sensitised approach to analyse the entanglements of the micro-level contexts of interaction with the macro-level discourses of meaning-giving. KEY WORDS: unofficial place names, social spatialisations, self- and other-positioning, place-bound identities 1 ABSTRACT IN FINNISH: Sosiaaliset spatialisaatiot ovat yhteiskunnassa vaikuttavia tilaa koskevia ideologisia diskursseja. Tässä artikkelissa
    [Show full text]
  • FP7-285556 Safecity Project Deliverable D2.5 Helsinki Public Safety Scenario
    FP7‐285556 SafeCity Project Deliverable D2.5 Helsinki Public Safety Scenario Deliverable Type: CO Nature of the Deliverable: R Date: 30.09.2011 Distribution: WP2 Editors: VTT Contributors: VTT, ISDEFE *Deliverable Type: PU= Public, RE= Restricted to a group specified by the Consortium, PP= Restricted to other program participants (including the Commission services), CO= Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission services) ** Nature of the Deliverable: P= Prototype, R= Report, S= Specification, T= Tool, O= Other Abstract: This document is an analysis of Helsinki’s public safety characters. It describes the critical infrastructure of Helsinki, discuss its current limitations, and give ideas for the future. D2.5 – HELSINKI PUBLIC SAFETY SCENARIO PROJECT Nº FP7‐ 285556 DISCLAIMER The work associated with this report has been carried out in accordance with the highest technical standards and SafeCity partners have endeavored to achieve the degree of accuracy and reliability appropriate to the work in question. However since the partners have no control over the use to which the information contained within the report is to be put by any other party, any other such party shall be deemed to have satisfied itself as to the suitability and reliability of the information in relation to any particular use, purpose or application. Under no circumstances will any of the partners, their servants, employees or agents accept any liability whatsoever arising out of any error or inaccuracy contained in this report (or any further consolidation, summary, publication or dissemination of the information contained within this report) and/or the connected work and disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, expenses, claims or infringement of third party rights.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 29 April 2004 REPORT1 ◄ on the Fact-finding mission to Finland, March 24 - 26, 2004. Petition 873/2002 by Niemelä and Sario Oy, on behalf of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation. To investigate the impact of the development of the Vuosaari Cargo Port, and related projects, on the Mustavuori/Östersundom area, specially protected under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC & the Birds Directive 79/409/EEC. Committee on Petitions Members of the delegation: Richard Balfe MEP Patsy Sörensen MEP David Lowe Secretariat, Committee on Petitions. Ex-officio members: Astrid Thors MEP Uma Aaltonen MEP Matti Wuori MEP and: Kjell Sevon, Adviser, Green Group secretariat, Linda Lindholm Ulriikka Aarnio Hannariikka Nieminen 1 presented to the Committee on April 26 & 27 2004. PR\528730EN.doc PE 343.922 EN EN Introduction The construction of the Vuosaari Port and hinterland has been discussed by the Helsinki authorities and planned by them for over twenty-five years. Long before their membership of the European Union, the Finnish Government and Helsinki Municipal Council agreed that an alternative cargo port was required in order to relieve pressure on the three existing ports of Helsinki and their urban environment. The economy of the Helsinki region has always been linked to the functioning of the port facilities and competitive development of the Turku port, further to the west, imposed sharper economic considerations on the decision-making process in Helsinki. Construction work finally began at the beginning of 2003 and it is the intention of the Helsinki authorities to complete the Vuosaari harbour and the related Vuoli traffic connections by 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Rostock 12 Th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference, 31 May – 2 June 2012
    Rostock 12 th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference, 31 May – 2 June 2012 MASS STABILISATION IN CONSTRUCTION OF SOFT SUBSOILS AND IN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS AT CITY OF HELSINKI Juha Forsman / Ramboll Finland Oy, Osmo Korhonen / City of Helsinki, Jorma Havukainen / Ramboll Finland Oy, Kata Kreft-Burman / Ramboll Finland Oy ABSTRACT The city of Helsinki is under a continual process of constructing the new districts and improving the already existing ones. The examples of typical ground construction and preconstruction problems faced in Helsinki include the following issues: construction has to be performed in an area with very soft postglacial clay or peat as the areas considered more suitable from the geotechnical point of view have already been constructed, shortage of fill and embankment materials, and shortage of landfill areas for surplus soils. The mass stabilisation technology proves to be a cost effective solution to these challenges. This article presents some examples of how mass stabilisation has been applied to solve challenges in various construction sites in the city of Helsinki during the last 20 years. 1. INTRODUCTION Mass stabilisation is a ground improvement method where binder is mixed into peat, mud or soft clay. The procedure is carried out with the help of a mixing tool installed on an excavator machine (Figure 1). The mixing tool has been invented in Finland in the beginning of 1990’s. The technology was initially developed for the purpose of stabilising soft peat and clay. As the mass stabilisation technology has evolved new fields of application have been introduced, for instance the treatment of dredged mud and contaminated soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Guide
    15.1.2019 MASTER'S GUIDE Vessel Traffic Services The provisions on vessel traffic services are laid down in the Vessel Traffic Service Act 623/2005 and in the Government Decrees on Vessel Traffic Service 763/2005, 1798/2009, 1304/2011 and 1216/2018. PARTICIPATION IN VESSEL TRAFFIC SERVICES Vessels of 24 metres in length overall or more are obliged to participate in the vessel traffic services. When navigating in the VTS area, vessels are required to maintain a continuous listening watch on the working channel used in the area. Furthermore, vessels are obliged to obey the rules relevant to the traffic in the VTS area. More detailed instructions about the required reports and working channels can be found in the regional VTS guides. Vessels navigating in the VTS area, which are not obliged to participate in the vessel traffic services, are recommended to maintain a listening watch on the working channel in the VTS area or sector in question. OPERATIONAL HOURS AND LOCATION OF VTS CENTRES In Finland the vessel traffic services (VTS services) are operated by Vessel Traffic Services Finland Ltd (VTS Finland). The sea areas at the Finnish coast are divided into six VTS areas. These are Bothnia VTS, West Coast VTS, Archipelago VTS, Hanko VTS, Helsinki VTS and Kotka VTS. In addition, Saimaa VTS operates in the Saimaa deep water fairway. Along the coast VTS services are provided 24 h/day throughout the year. There may be operational interruptions due to technical problems or an unexpected shortage of personnel. Information about the interruptions is given as navigational or local warnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Helsinki Development Programme 2022
    SERIE B 2012:10 Port of Helsinki Development programme 2022 PORT OF HELSINKI PUBLICATION 13.11.2012 1(15) Development programme for the parts of the Port of Helsinki 2022 Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Prognosis of market and demand development 3 2.1 Passenger and vehicle traffic 3 2.1.1 Tallinn traffic 3 2.1.2 Stockholm traffic 4 2.1.3 St. Petersburg traffic 4 2.1.4 Cruise traffic 5 2.2 Cargo traffic 5 2.2.1 Tallinn traffic 6 2.2.2 Stockholm traffic 6 2.2.3 St. Petersburg traffic 6 2.2.4 Other cargo traffic 6 2.3 The development of demand and competition based on ship type 2.3.1 Passenger ferry traffic 2.3.2 RoRo ferry traffic 2.3.3 Train ferry traffic 2.3.4 Container ship traffic 3 Port-specific examination 3.1 Katajanokka harbour 3.2 West Harbour 3.3 Vuosaari Harbour 3.4 South Harbour 4. Use of parts of the port until the year 2022 12 4.1 Katajanokka Harbour 13 4.2 South Harbour 13 4.3 West Harbour 14 4.4 Vuosaari Harbour 14 5. Operational development 15 2(15) 1. Introduction The development of traffic connections and port traffic is important for the business life and well-being of the Helsinki area. The Port of Helsinki supports this development by offering its customers – shipping companies, operators, exporters, importers and passengers – a functional and sufficient framework to manage foreign trade transport. The Port of Helsinki and the Helsinki area have developed in interaction with each other, which has resulted in industrial and commercial activity being centred around import, export and logistics, more than on average.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciudad Y Territorio Virtual
    LOS MODELOS EN REALIDAD VIRTUAL EN LA TOMA DE DECISIONES Y EL TRABAJO DE EQUIPOS MULTIDISCIPLINARES JARKKO SIREENI Bussiness Manager Visualization ViaSys Oy Espoo – Finlandia www.viasys.com VICENTE CUÉLLAR MORO Director General ViaNova Systems Spain Madrid – España www.vianova.es En los países nórdicos es ya común apoyarse en modelos en RV a la hora de tomar decisiones urbanísticas. Las posibilidades de interacción con los modelos, y de representación de la realidad futura, nos permiten "caminar" por la ciudad que proyectamos para evaluar la conveniencia de nuestros proyectos. Creemos que es importante resaltar las diferencias entre las herramientas de presentación (animaciones o vídeos 3D) y herramientas que permiten interactuar con los modelos (RV). Las primeras permiten un mejor texturado e iluminación (los cálculos no se realizan en tiempo real, sino que está precalculado), pero está mejor calidad se realiza a costa de no permitir al usuario "ver" lo que le interesa, y necesitan unos elevados tiempo de cálculos de renderizado, haciéndolos menos ágiles que los modelos en RV. El resultado es que estas herramientas dejan de ser herramientas de "presentación" para integrase totalmente en el proceso de trabajo, incluso desde la etapas más tempranas. Se demuestran fundamentales a la hora de permitir el trabajo de equipos multidisciplinares, cuyas discusiones, ideas y propuestas se realizan en torno al modelo de Realidad Virtual, convirtiéndose el modelo en una herramienta clave para la toma de decisiones durante el proyecto. Como ejemplos prácticos se mostraran dos proyectos realizados por ViaSys Oy, la compañía Finlandesa de ViaNova, desarrolladora de nuestro módulo de realidad virtual Novapoint Virtual Map: El primer proyecto se realizó en el año 2000, en la ciudad de Lohja.
    [Show full text]
  • Vuosikertomus 2020
    UMO Helsinki Jazz Orchestra VUOSIKERTOMUS 2020 Electronically signed / Sähköisesti allekirjoitettu / Elektroniskt signerats / Elektronisk signert / Elektronisk underskrevet umohelsinki.fi • 1 https://sign.visma.net/fi/document-check/bfbe1003-212f-455d-a557-deacdf30848b www.vismasign.com UMO Helsinki Jazz Orchestra / UMO-säätiö sr Tallberginkatu 1 / 139, FI-00180 Helsinki umohelsinki.fi Kannessa: China Moses säihkyi UMO Helsingin solistina 5.11.2020. Kuva: Heikki Kynsijärvi Visuaalinen ilme ja taitto: Luova toimisto Pilke Electronically signed / Sähköisesti allekirjoitettu / Elektroniskt signerats / Elektronisk signert / Elektronisk underskrevet https://sign.visma.net/fi/document-check/bfbe1003-212f-455d-a557-deacdf30848b www.vismasign.com umohelsinki.fi Sisällys Toiminnanjohtajan katsaus: Mahdollisuuksien vuosi 4 UMO otti digiloikan 6 Tapahtumien ja kävijöiden määrä 8 Saavutettavuus tärkeää 10 Kansainvälinen muutos 13 Asiakas keskiössä 14 Uutta musiikkia 16 Kantaesitykset 19 Yleisötyötä livenä & verkossa 21 Katsaus tulevaan 24 Rahoittajat ja tukijat 26 Konserttikalenteri 2020 27 Hallitus ja hallinto 32 Muusikot 34 Talous 36 Electronically signed / Sähköisesti allekirjoitettu / Elektroniskt signerats / Elektronisk signert / Elektronisk underskrevet umohelsinki.fi • 3 https://sign.visma.net/fi/document-check/bfbe1003-212f-455d-a557-deacdf30848b www.vismasign.com TOIMINNANJOHTAJAN KATSAUS: MAHDOLLISUUKSIEN VUOSI Koronan leviämisen estäminen on piinannut erityi- kuussa. Uskolliset asiakkaamme lähtivät varovaisesti sesti kulttuurialaa. Kun
    [Show full text]
  • Vuosaari-Seura Ry Toimintakertomus 2017
    1 Vuosaari-Seura ry Toimintakertomus 2017 2 Sisällys 1. Vuosaari-Seuran vuosi 2017 pähkinänkuoressa ...................................................................................... 3 2. Hallinto ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Hallitus .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Yhteistyökumppanit .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Jäsenistö ja talous ................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Toiminta .................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Erityishankkeet 2017 .............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1.1 Vuoden Kaupunginosa -palkinto...................................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Nuorten kesätyöhanke ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.3 Suomi 100 -juhlavuosi .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]