Harperocallis Is Congeneric with Isidrogalvia (Tofieldiaceae, Alismatales): Evidence from Comparative Floral Morphology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harperocallis Is Congeneric with Isidrogalvia (Tofieldiaceae, Alismatales): Evidence from Comparative Floral Morphology TAXON 19 July 2011: 19 pp. Remizowa & al. • Classification of Tofieldiaceae MORPHOLOGY Harperocallis is congeneric with Isidrogalvia (Tofieldiaceae, Alismatales): Evidence from comparative floral morphology Margarita V. Remizowa,1 Dmitry D. Sokoloff,1 Lisa M. Campbell,2 Dennis W. Stevenson2 & Paula J. Rudall3 1 Department of Higher Plants, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458, U.S.A. 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, U.K. Author for correspondence: Margarita Remizowa, [email protected] Abstract Flowers of most Tofieldiaceae are inserted laterally in the axils of well-developed flower-subtending bracts in a racemose inflorescence, each flower possessing a characteristic calyculus. The monospecific genus Harperocallis, which is endemic to north-western Florida, represents the only member of Tofieldiaceae with a consistently solitary terminal flower. We compare flowers of H. flava with those of Isidrogalvia, a putative close relative of Harperocallis from South America. We analyse the resulting data in an extended morphological analysis for the entire family. Both Harperocallis and Isidrogalvia lack septal nectaries, which are functionally replaced by tuberculate glands on the ovary walls; in both genera the carpels are united with congenital carpel fusion at the gynoecium base. Flowers of both genera are relatively large and highly vas- cularized; the calycular phyllomes and tepals each possess several veins and the carpels contain (in addition to dorsal and ventral bundles) both lateral bundles and separate placental bundles that support massive intrusive placentae. The presence of a synascidiate zone with congenital intercarpellary fusion in both genera is correlated with the formation of heterocar- pellary ventral bundles. Harperocallis is unusual in that the stamens are often supplied by three veins. Our morphological cladistic analysis supports earlier molecular data indicating a close relationship between Harperocallis and Isidrogalvia, and several morphological characters are revealed as synapomorphies of this sister-pairing. This finding, resulting from strong morphological similarities between Harperocallis and Isidrogalvia, allows the transfer of H. flava into Isidrogalvia. Keywords floral anatomy; gynoecium; Harperocallis; Isidrogalvia; Tofieldiaceae INTRODUCTION three genera that contain more than one species (Isidrogal- via, Tofieldia, Triantha) was found to be monophyletic. Pleea The monocot family Tofieldiaceae includes five genera was strongly supported as a sister to all other Tofieldiaceae, (Harperocallis McDaniel, Isidrogalvia Ruiz & Pav., Pleea which fall into two distinct clades: (1) Tofieldia + Triantha and Michx., Tofieldia Huds., Triantha (Nutt.) Baker) distributed (2) Isidrogalvia + Harperocallis; thus their phylogenetic re- in Eurasia, North America, and South America. Based on re- construction is summarized as Pleea ((Tofieldia + Triantha) + cent molecular phylogenies, Tofieldiaceae are placed in the (Isidrogalvia + Harperocallis)). Based on their results, Azuma order Alismatales (APG, 1998; Qiu & al., 2000; Chase & al., & Tobe (2010) hypothesized that the possession of six (rather 2000, 2006; Chase, 2004; Davis & al., 2004; Givnish & al., than nine) stamens per flower represents a synapomorphy of 2006; Graham & al., 2006; APG III, 2009). Tofieldiaceae are all Tofieldiaceae except Pleea, a problematic conclusion that well defined by several synapomorphies, of which the most requires further discussion in a broader context of androe- important is a structure termed a calyculus, which represents cium evolution in all lineages of early-divergent monocots three involucral phyllomes surrounding the flower (Takhta- (Endress, 1995; Ronse De Craene & Smets, 1995; Remizowa jan, 1994, 1997, 2009; Zomlefer, 1997; Remizowa & Sokoloff & al., 2010b). Azuma & Tobe (2010) further hypothesized that 2003; Remizowa & al., 2006a, 2010a; Azuma & Tobe 2010). an inflorescence axis bearing glandular trichomes is a syn- In all genera of Tofieldiaceae except Harperocallis, flowers apomorphy of Triantha, and that free calycular phyllomes are are lateral and situated in the axils of well-developed flower- a synapomorphy of Harperocallis + Isidrogalvia. They con- subtending bracts (Takhtajan, 1994, 1997, 2009; Zomlefer, cluded that most intergeneric relationships in Tofieldiaceae 1997; Remizowa & Sokoloff 2003; Remizowa & al., 2006a, have weak or no support from morphological characters and 2010a), though a terminal flower is also occasionally present recommended a comparative morphological study of the genera (Remizowa, 2007). Harperocallis differs considerably from all (Azuma & Tobe, 2010). the other genera in consistently possessing a single terminal Extensive comparative studies on the floral morphology flower. and anatomy of Tofieldiaceae (summarized below) have in- Azuma & Tobe (2010) conducted a molecular phylogenetic dicated that floral data are useful as phylogenetic markers in study including all genera of Tofieldiaceae. They found that the group. However, many gaps remain, especially with re- the monophyly of Tofieldiaceae is well supported. Each of the spect to the monospecific Harperocallis, which is the most 1 Remizowa & al. • Classification of Tofieldiaceae TAXON 19 July 2011: 19 pp. enigmatic genus of the family (Zomlefer, 1997). Harperocallis base (Zomlefer, 1997). The ovary with tuberculate emergences flava McDaniel is narrowly endemic to the western Florida is also highlighted as a unique feature (autapomorphy) of Har- Panhandle, where it has a relatively limited range and very low perocallis (Ambrose, 1980; Cruden, 1991; Zomlefer, 1997). The infraspecific genetic diversity (Godt & al., 1997). Surprisingly, floral anatomy of Harperocallis was studied by Utech (1993), this remarkable species with relatively large and showy flow- who reported a multi-bundled pedicel and a simple axial vas- ers was described relatively recently (McDaniel, 1968). In this cular system of a single terminal flower. According to Utech study, we re-examine the floral anatomy of Isidrogalvia and (1993), the carpels are nearly apocarpous and supplied by three Harperocallis with particular respect to gynoecium structure. veins each, one dorsal and two ventrals. Both of these genera are relatively poorly known in contrast Using a morphological cladistic analysis, we explore with Tofieldia and its allies. whether data on floral morphology are congruent with the Tofieldia and Triantha are characterized by small flowers molecular-based conclusion that Harperocallis and Isidro- each surrounded by united calyculus phyllomes. Calyculus galvia form a sister pair (Azuma & Tobe, 2010). Earlier mor- phyllomes, tepals (in most species), and stamens are each sup- phology-based studies have revealed contrasting relationships plied by a single vein (Anderson, 1940; El-Hamidi, 1952; Eie, among the taxa currently assigned to Tofieldiaceae. Ambrose 1972; Utech, 1978; Sterling, 1979; Remizowa & al., 2010a). The (1980) conducted a numerical (phenetic) analysis of “Lilia- gynoecium is syncarpous and consists of three postgenitally ceae-Melanthioideae”, a polyphyletic group that includes taxa united stipitate carpels. The ovary is trilocular (usually a short currently placed in quite different families and orders: Tofiel- unilocular region is also present in the middle part of the ovary) diaceae (Alismatales), Nartheciaceae (Dioscoreales), Colchi- and possesses infralocular septal (gynopleural) nectaries. Each caceae and Melanthiaceae (Liliales). In analyses of a matrix carpel consists of a short sterile ascidiate zone and a long fertile containing 19 species and 110 characters, a dendrogram for the plicate zone. The carpel stipes, stylodia, and stigmas are free genera of Tofieldiaceae (Ambrose, 1980) was topologically the (Takhtajan, 1994, 1997; Zomlefer, 1997; Smets & al., 2000; Ig- same as the phylogenetic tree of Azuma & Tobe (2010). When ersheim & al., 2001; Rudall, 2002; Remizowa & Sokoloff, 2003; 28 species and 71 characters were analysed (Ambrose, 1980), Remizowa & al., 2006b, 2010a). Each carpel is individually the following clustering was found: Pleea (Triantha (Tofieldia vascularized with a dorsal and a ventral vein. The ventral vein (Harperocallis + Isidrogalvia))). Cruden (1991) conducted a cla- divides into two strands in the cross-zone (Anderson, 1940; distic analysis based on 36 morphological characters scored for Utech, 1978; Sterling, 1979; Remizowa & al., 2010a). ten species of Tofieldiaceae (including members of all genera) Isidrogalvia differs from Tofieldia + Triantha (and Pleea) plus an outgroup based on characters of Aletris, Narthecium by possession of free calyculus phyllomes, large flowers, te- and Nietneria, which are now placed in Nartheciaceae, in a pals supplied by numerous veins and other characters (Сruden, different order, Dioscoreales (APG III, 2009). When all 36 1991; Zomlefer, 1997). With about ten species (Cruden, 1991; characters were considered, Isidrogalvia was monophyletic; Campbell, 2010), Isidrogalvia is one of the two largest gen- Isidrogalvia and Harperocallis formed two successive basal era of the family (together with Tofieldia) and represents the branches on a cladogram. When some morphological data only South American member. Sterling (1979) examined the were omitted, Isidrogalvia was either paraphyletic or sister to gynoecium anatomy of some species of Isidrogalvia (along Pleea.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Lecture Notes 2013
    5/24/13 Week 8; Monday Lecture: Monocots Part I: Some animal pollinated monocots Monocots are monophyletic! Traditional primary division is between Dicots and Monocots Trait “Dicots” Monocots # cotyledons 2 cotyledons 1 cotyledon stem ring of vascular bundles scattered vascular bundles vascular cambium often present no vascular cambium habit woody or herbaceous primarily herbaceous (no true wood) leaves simple or compound usually simple venation net veined: pinnate, palmate parallel (or striate) leaf narrow usually broad, often sheathing insertion (wrapping around the stem) roots primary --> secondary primary roots abort; adventitious roots, too adventitious roots only taproot or fibrous usually fibrous flower parts parts in 4’s, 5’s, or ∞ (rarely 3) parts in 3’s pollen monosulcate or tricolpate monosulcate Today we will look at some of the more important families of animal pollinated monocots found in the temperate zone Overhead of monocot phylogeny based on rbcL - distribution of monocot groups. Chase et al. 2000, overhead Page 57 5/24/13 Lab only; limited discussion here. Show: “Plants are Cool, Too” video Araceae - Arum family (109 gen/2830 spp) 1) herbs (some epiphytes) 2) lvs simple or compound; broad and having an apparent petiole (‘pseudo-lamina’) development not same as in a dicot leaf blade 3) calcium oxalate crystals usually present – physical deterrent to herbivory 4) Inflorescence consisting of - spathe - bract (often colorful) surrounding the flowers - spadix - axis on which the flowers are borne (male above; female below,
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Tofieldia Ulleungensis (Tofieldiaceae): a New Species, Endemic to Ulleungdo Island, Korea
    Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 50(3): 343−350 (2020) pISSN 1225-8318 eISSN 2466-1546 https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2020.50.3.343 Korean Journal of RESEARCH ARTICLE Plant Taxonomy Tofieldia ulleungensis (Tofieldiaceae): A new species, endemic to Ulleungdo Island, Korea Hyeryun JO, Balkrishna GHIMIRE, Young-Ho HA, Kang-Hyup LEE and Dong Chan SON* Division of Forest Biodiversity and Herbarium, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon 11186, Korea (Received 19 August 2020; Revised 5 September 2020; Accepted 18 September 2020) ABSTRACT: Tofieldia ulleungensis, a new species of the genus Tofieldia from the Nari Basin on Ulleungdo Island, Korea, is described and illustrated. The new species is similar to T. yoshiiana var. koreana in terms of the plant height and in that it has having a long raceme, whitish tepals, and whitish stigma, but can be readily dis- tinguished from the latter by the presence of 1–2 linear cauline leaves, a slightly bent leaf apex, basal leaves which are twice as wide, a shorter pedicel, a revolute style, and crescent-shaped seeds. Keywords: Tofieldiaceae, Tofieldia ulleungensis, endemic, Ulleungdo Island, Korea The genus Tofieldia Huds. (Tofieldiaceae) comprised about recognized by Nakai (1911), but later he (Nakai, 1914) 12 species distributed in the subarctic, temperate, and transferred T. taquetii to T. fauriei. In 1916, Nakai reported a subtropical regions of the Northern Hemisphere (Chen and new species, T. nutans Willd. ex Schult.f., from Rhobong, Tamura, 2000; Yamazaki, 2002; Tamura et al., 2004, 2010, Pyeonganbuk-do, North Korea, and Chung (1957) recognized 2011). The species are morphologically characterized by 2- two species T.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020
    November 19, 2020 crevice Alaska Rock Garden Society November Meeting: Alpines of the Pinnell Mountain National Recreation Trail By Marilyn Barker Saturday, November 21, 10 AM on Zoom [Zoom details to follow in separate email] Dear Members- I am looking forward to seeing all of you on our Zoom Meeting on Saturday. I think Marilyn’s program will be wonderful and informative. This will be the last meeting until next year! We will get information out to you about that meeting the first part of the month. Have a wonderful Holiday Season. Be safe and healthy, Florene Carney President Alaska Rock Garden Society (Zoom continued on page 2) Crevice is an occasional publication of the Alaska Rock Garden Society for small items. The masthead is an except from Eriophorum scheuchzeri by Rhonda Williams, used with permission. © Alaska Rock Garden Society 2020 PO Box 244136, Anchorage, AK 99524-4136 2 ARGS Crevice November 19, 2020 Alaska Rock Garden Society Membership Meeting November 21, 2020 ZOOM AGENDA Welcome Treasurer’s Report Approval of Minutes Seed Exchange Program – Marilyn Barker “Alpines of the Pinnell Mountain National Recreation Trail” Member Comments Adjourn Alaska Rock Garden Society Membership Meeting October 17, 2020 ZOOM 10:00 A.M. MINUTES Florene Carney called the meeting to order at 10:10 A.M. with a welcome to everyone joining our first ZOOM Membership Meeting. Jamie Smith, Secretary, gave a brief overview of the Oct 9, 2020 Exec Board minutes. Two important points: At that meeting, the current Executive Board UNANIMOUSLY agreed to remain in their current positions thru the 2020-2021 year to maintain continuity thru the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til
    Volume 2(4): 425–452 TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til. Ro)'al BOTANIC GARDENS dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea19834408 Journal of Plant Systematics 6 DOPII(liPi Tmst plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL· ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig. 1 (1983) 425 CURRENT ANATOMICAL RESEARCH IN LILIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE AND IRIDACEAE* D.F. CUTLER AND MARY GREGORY (Accepted for publication 20.9.1982) ABSTRACT Cutler, D.F. and Gregory, Mary (Jodrell(Jodrel/ Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, England) 1983. Current anatomical research in Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Iridaceae. Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig.1-An annotated bibliography is presented covering literature over the period 1968 to date. Recent research is described and areas of future work are discussed. INTRODUCTION In this article, the literature for the past twelve or so years is recorded on the anatomy of Liliaceae, AmarylIidaceae and Iridaceae and the smaller, related families, Alliaceae, Haemodoraceae, Hypoxidaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae and Trilliaceae. Subjects covered range from embryology, vegetative and floral anatomy to seed anatomy. A format is used in which references are arranged alphabetically, numbered and annotated, so that the reader can rapidly obtain an idea of the range and contents of papers on subjects of particular interest to him. The main research trends have been identified, classified, and check lists compiled for the major headings. Current systematic anatomy on the 'Anatomy of the Monocotyledons' series is reported. Comment is made on areas of research which might prove to be of future significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Macbridea Alba
    Macbridea alba (White birds-in-a-nest) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Lathrop Management Area, Bay County. Photos by Vivian Negrón-Ortiz U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Panama City Field Office Panama City, Florida 5-YEAR REVIEW Macbridea alba (White birds-in-a-nest) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review This review was accomplished using information obtained from the plant’s 1994 Recovery Plan, peer reviewed scientific publications, unpublished field survey results, reports of current research projects, unpublished field observations by Service, State and other experienced biologists, and personal communications. These documents are on file at the Panama City Field Office. A Federal Register notice announcing the review and requesting information was published on April 16, 2008 (73 FR 20702). Comments received and suggestions from peer reviewers were evaluated and incorporated as appropriate (see appendix A). No part of this review was contracted to an outside party. This review was completed by the Service’s lead Recovery botanist in the Panama City Field Office, Florida. B. Reviewers Lead Field Office: Dr. Vivian Negrón-Ortiz, Panama City Field Office, 850-769-0552 ext. 231, [email protected] Lead Region: Southeast Region: Kelly Bibb, 404-679-7132 Peer reviewers: Ms. Louise Kirn, District Ecologist Apalachicola National Forest P.O. Box 579, Bristol, FL 32321 Ms. Faye Winters, Field Office Biologist BLM Jackson Field Office 411 Briarwood Drive, Suite 404 Jackson, MS 39206 C. Background 1. FR Notice citation announcing initiation of this review: 73 FR 20702 (April 16, 2008). 1 2. Species status: Unknown (Recovery Data Call 2008); the species status is unknown until all the Element Occurrences1 (EO’s) are revisited.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened and Endangered Species List
    Effective April 15, 2009 - List is subject to revision For a complete list of Tennessee's Rare and Endangered Species, visit the Natural Areas website at http://tennessee.gov/environment/na/ Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Plants and Aquatic Animals with Protected Status State Federal Type Class Order Scientific Name Common Name Status Status Habit Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus gulolineatus Berry Cave Salamander T Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus palleucus Tennessee Cave Salamander T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus bouchardi Big South Fork Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus cymatilis A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus deweesae Valley Flame Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus extraneus Chickamauga Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus obeyensis Obey Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus pristinus A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus williami "Brawley's Fork Crayfish" E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Fallicambarus hortoni Hatchie Burrowing Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes incomptus Tennessee Cave Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes shoupi Nashville Crayfish E LE Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes wrighti A Crayfish E Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris carthusiana Spinulose Shield Fern T Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris cristata Crested Shield-Fern T FACW, OBL, Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Trichomanes boschianum
    [Show full text]
  • Araceae) from the Upper Maastrichtian of South Dakota
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 177(8):706–725. 2016. q 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2016/17708-0006$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/688285 EVALUATING RELATIONSHIPS AMONG FLOATING AQUATIC MONOCOTS: A NEW SPECIES OF COBBANIA (ARACEAE) FROM THE UPPER MAASTRICHTIAN OF SOUTH DAKOTA Ruth A. Stockey,1,* Gar W. Rothwell,*,† and Kirk R. Johnson‡ *Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2082 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA; †Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA; and ‡National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, MRC 106, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Editor: Patrick S. Herendeen Premise of research. A large number of floating aquatic aroid fossils have been recovered from pond sediments in the Hell Creek Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of South Dakota, providing valuable new data about aquatic vegetation of the uppermost Cretaceous, that are used to describe a new species of the genus Cobbania,and to evaluate associated reproductive structures and phylogenetic relationships among floating aquatic monocots. Methodology. Fossils were uncovered as needed with fine needles to reveal surface features of the specimens. Images were captured with a digital scanning camera, and phylogenetic analyses were conducted with TNT implemented through WinClada. Pivotal results. The new species, Cobbania hickeyi Stockey, Rothwell & Johnson, extends the range of the genus to the uppermost Cretaceous, supports the taxonomic integrity of the genus Cobbania, and increases our understanding of structural variation and species richness within the genus. Associated reproductive structures include an aroid spadix, strengthening the assignment of Cobbania to the Araceae.
    [Show full text]