DOCSLIB.ORG

Existing Conditions Report, North Shore Road EIS, Swain and Graham Counties, North Carolina, by TRC Garrow Associates, Inc., and Is Briefly Summarized Below

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Existing Conditions Report, North Shore Road EIS, Swain and Graham Counties, North Carolina, by TRC Garrow Associates, Inc., and Is Briefly Summarized Below EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT NORTH SHORE ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SWAIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA January 2004 Existing Conditions Report North Shore Road Environmental Impact Statement Swain County, North Carolina Contract No. DTFH71-02-D-00004 Task Order 0002 Prepared for: National Park Service and Federal Highway Administration Prepared by: ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. 801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300 Raleigh North Carolina 27607 Tel 919 854 1282 Fax 919 854 5448 Our Ref.: NC603001.0000 Date: January 2004 Existing Conditions North Shore Road 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Report Purpose 1 1.2 Study Area Description 1 1.3 Project Purpose and Need and the 1943 Agreement 2 1.4 North Shore Road History 2 1.5 Great Smoky Mountains National Park History 3 2. Existing Roadway and Traffic Conditions 4 2.1 Roadway and Trail Conditions 4 2.1.1 Roadways 4 2.1.2 GSMNP Trails and Old Roadbeds 7 2.1.3 Tunnel and Bridge Conditions 8 2.2 Existing Traffic Conditions 11 2.2.1 System Linkage 11 2.2.2 Transportation Plans 12 2.2.3 Historic Traffic Growth 13 2.2.4 2003 Traffic Surveys 14 2.2.5 Roadway Capacity 15 2.2.6 Speed Study 19 2.3 Accident Analysis 20 2.3.1 Conclusion 25 3. Existing Environmental Conditions 26 3.1 Land Use (Existing and Future) 26 3.1.1 Great Smoky Mountains National Park 26 3.1.2 Nantahala National Forest 28 3.1.3 Swain County 30 3.1.4 Graham County 30 i Existing Conditions North Shore Road 3.1.5 Bryson City 30 3.1.6 Tennessee Valley Authority 32 3.2 Socioeconomic and Community Features 35 3.2.1 Demographic Profile of the Project Study Area 35 3.2.2 Environmental Justice 47 3.2.3 Community and Social Features 52 3.2.4 Economy and Employment 56 3.3 Cultural Resources 60 3.3.1 Archaeological Sites 61 3.3.2 Historic Structures and Other Aboveground Resources 64 3.3.3 Cemeteries 67 3.3.4 Traditional Cultural Properties 69 3.3.5 Other Cultural Resources 70 3.3.6 Summary 71 3.4 Parklands and Recreational Facilities 71 3.4.1 Great Smoky Mountains National Park 72 3.4.2 Appalachian National Scenic Trail 75 3.4.3 Nantahala National Forest 76 3.4.4 Other Study Area Parks and Recreational Facilities 76 3.5 Topography, Geology, and Soils 78 3.5.1 Topography 78 3.5.2 Regional Geology 78 3.5.3 Local Geology 79 3.5.4 Mineral Resources 84 3.5.5 Structural Geology 85 3.5.6 General Geotechnical and Geologic Design Considerations 86 3.5.7 Soils 90 ii Existing Conditions North Shore Road 3.6 Water Resources 94 3.6.1 Surface Waters 94 3.6.2 Wild and Scenic Rivers 98 3.6.3 Water Quality 99 3.6.4 Sole Source Aquifiers 110 3.6.5 Wellhead Protection Program 110 3.6.6 Groundwater Recharge Areas 110 3.7 Wetlands 111 3.7.1 Regulatory Requirements 111 3.7.2 Mitigation 113 3.7.3 Wetlands in the Project Study Area 114 3.7.4 Navigable Waters 116 3.8 Floodplains 116 3.9 Biological Resources 117 3.9.1 Vegetative Communities 117 3.9.2 Terrestrial Wildlife 130 3.9.3 Aquatic Wildlife 143 3.9.4 Invasive Exotic Species 146 3.9.5 Protected Species 147 3.10 Aesthetics and Viewsheds 169 3.10.1 Scenic Byways 171 3.11 Air Quality 171 3.11.1 Regulatory Status 171 3.11.2The Clean Air Act and Class 1 Areas 173 3.12 Noise 174 3.12.1 Characteristics of Noise 174 3.12.2 Noise Abatement Criteria 179 iii Existing Conditions North Shore Road 3.12.3 Ambient Noise Levels 180 3.12.4 Summary 180 3.13 Hazardous Material and Waste Sites 181 3.14 Utilities 186 3.14.1 GSMNP 186 3.14.2 TVA’s Fontana Reservoir 186 3.14.3 Remaining Study Area Utilities 187 3.15 Public Projects in the Vicinity of the Study Area 187 3.15.1 NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program Projects 188 3.15.2 Thoroughfare Plans 188 3.15.3 GSMNP Projects 189 3.15.4 Wilderness Designation 191 3.15.5 Fontana Dam Project 191 3.16 Private In-Holdings 191 4. References 193 Tables 1 Primary Bridges and Culverts on State Routes 2 Structures Within Great Smoky Mountains National Park Study Area 3 Intersection Level of Service – Unsignalized (Year 2003) 4 Intersection Level of Service – Signalized (Year 2003) 5 Mainline Levels of Service (2003) 6 Speed Study (2003) 7 Intersection Accident Data (Fall 1999 through Fall 2002) 8 Mainline Accident Data (Fall 1999 through Fall 2002) 9 Corridor Accident Rates 10 Intersection Accident Rates iv Existing Conditions North Shore Road 11 1990-2000 Population Growth for State, County, Place, Census Tract, and Block Group 12 Ethnicity and Race by State, County, Place, Census Tract, and Block Group for 1990 13 Ethnicity and Race by State, County, Place, Census Tract, and Block Group for 2000 14 Income Levels and Poverty Status for Households in the Study Region for 1999 15 Housing Units for 2000 16 Housing Tenure for 2000 17 Housing Values (Owner-Occupied) for 2000 18 Population Change Between 1900 and 2000 19 Workforce by Industry 20 Largest Manufacturers in Graham and Swain Counties 21 Fontana Lake Classification of Designated Use and NCDWQ Stream Index Number, Graham and Swain Counties, North Carolina 22 Stream Segments on the National Rivers Inventory Within the Project Study Area 23 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Holders Within the Project Study Area 24 Summary of Hazel Creek Water Quality Data, Sampling from 1994-2002 25 Comparison of Selected Water Quality Parameters for Fontana and Hazel Creek Mines 26 Area and Description of NWI Mapped Wetlands and Deepwater Habitat Within the Project Study Area 27 Cross-Reference of Vegetative Communities Found Within the Project Study Area 28 Federally Protected Species Known from Graham and Swain Counties, North Carolina 29 Federal Species of Concern Known from Graham and Swain Counties, North Carolina 30 State Species of Concern Known from Swain and Graham Counties, North Carolina v Existing Conditions North Shore Road 31 Element Occurrences of Protected, Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive (PETS) Species in Graham and/or Swain County, North Carolina 32 NAAQS and Monitored Concentrations for Criteria Pollutants 33 Dominating Noise Sources (30-Minute Reading Sites) 34 Dominating Noise Sources (24 Hour Reading Sites) 35 Typical Human Hearing Levels 36 Noise Abatement Criteria 37 Hazardous Material and Waste Sites Identified by EDR 38 Hazardous Material Waste Sites (Orphan Sites) Figures 1 General Vicinity Map 2 Great Smoky Mountains National Park Trails, Old Roadbeds and Railroad Beds 3A Proposed Roadway Improvements 3B Proposed Roadway Improvements 4A Traffic Data and Capacity Analysis – Intersection Reference Map 4B Traffic Data and Capacity Analysis – Intersection Peak Hour Volumes 5 Land Use 6 General Management Plan (GMP) Proposed Management Zoning 7 Census Boundaries 8 Study Area Development 9 Major Employers 10 Recreational Amenities and Facilities 11 Mineral Resources and Geology 12 Soil Associations 13 Water Resources 14 Wetlands vi Existing Conditions North Shore Road 15 Floodplains 16 Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitats – General Categories Vegetation Map 17A Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitats – National Park Service (NPS) Vegetation Map 17B Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitats – United States Forest Service (USFS) Vegetation Map 17C Terrestrial and Aquatic Habitats – North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCCGIA) Vegetation Map 18 Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Habitats 19 Ambient Noise Levels 20 Hazardous Waste Sites 21 Utilities 22 Private In-Holdings Appendices A Memorandum of Agreement of October 8, 1943 B Stream Classifications vii Existing Conditions North Shore Road 1. Introduction 1.1 Report Purpose The purpose of this report is to document the existing conditions of the study area, including the cultural, natural, and human aspects of the environment. Other existing conditions include the transportation network, air quality, ambient noise levels, and hazardous material and waste sites. A summary of this report will be used in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This report will provide the groundwork for developing alternatives and analyzing the anticipated impacts. Data for the report were collected by researching applicable literature and websites, conducting interviews with local authorities and field specialists, reviewing historical information relating to the project, performing site inspections of the study area, and reviewing public comments. 1.2 Study Area Description The study area, shown in Figure 1, is in western North Carolina, in portions of Swain and Graham counties. It extends from just west of Fontana Village to the eastern municipal limits of Bryson City, covering an area of roughly 120,000 acres (48,562 hectares [ha]). Fontana Lake divides the study area into halves to include land south and north of the lake. The southern limits of the study area parallel just south of NC 28 and US 19/US 74 while the northern limits follow an arc that includes the majority of land transferred in the October 8, 1943, Memorandum of Agreement (1943 Agreement). The 1943 Agreement, included in Appendix A, is explained in more detail in Section 1.3 of this report. In order to provide the full range of study alternatives Fontana Lake and thorough analyses that are required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the EIS study area covers a large expanse of land. Specifically, the inclusion of land south of Fontana Lake is necessary to evaluate the existing roadway network, the area’s transportation needs, and potential access options across Fontana Lake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Talking Stone: Cherokee Syllabary Inscriptions in Dark Zone Caves
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2017 Talking Stone: Cherokee Syllabary Inscriptions in Dark Zone Caves Beau Duke Carroll University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Carroll, Beau Duke, "Talking Stone: Cherokee Syllabary Inscriptions in Dark Zone Caves. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4985 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Beau Duke Carroll entitled "Talking Stone: Cherokee Syllabary Inscriptions in Dark Zone Caves." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Jan Simek, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: David G. Anderson, Julie L. Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Talking Stone: Cherokee Syllabary Inscriptions in Dark Zone Caves A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Beau Duke Carroll December 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Beau Duke Carroll All rights reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis would not be possible without the following people who contributed their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director
    North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director March 1, 2016 Honorable Jimmy Dixon Honorable Chuck McGrady N.C. House of Representatives N.C. House of Representatives 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 416B 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 304 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Senator Trudy Wade N.C. Senate 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 521 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Dear Honorables: I am submitting this report to the Environmental Review Committee in fulfillment of the requirements of Section 4.33 of Session Law 2015-286 (H765). As directed, this report includes a review of methods and criteria used by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the State protected animal list as defined in G.S. 113-331 and compares them to federal and state agencies in the region. This report also reviews North Carolina policies specific to introduced species along with determining recommendations for improvements to these policies among state and federally listed species as well as nonlisted animals. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at (919) 707-0151 or via email at [email protected]. Sincerely, Gordon Myers Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Report on Study Conducted Pursuant to S.L. 2015-286 To the Environmental Review Commission March 1, 2016 Section 4.33 of Session Law 2015-286 (H765) directed the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) to “review the methods and criteria by which it adds, removes, or changes the status of animals on the state protected animal list as defined in G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare
    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Permit Guidelines for Weddings, Portrait Photography and Historic Structure Use Great Smoky Mountains National Park
    Special Use Permit Guidelines for Weddings, Portrait Photography and Historic Structure Use Great Smoky Mountains National Park Great Smoky Mountains National Park is home to many beautiful and iconic scenic landscapes that make it a popular destination for weddings and wedding activities. These guidelines are intended to facilitate discrete services and ceremonies appropriate to the quiet, natural settings found in the park. Persons wishing to have a large wedding and/or utilize formal music or decorations should consider the Appalachian Clubhouse, Spence Cabin or the Twin Creeks picnic pavilion or a location outside the park. Please read these guidelines thoroughly and make sure the application is fully completed before submittal. Special Use Permits A Special Use Permit (SUP) is required to hold wedding services, vow renewal, or to use a historic structure (such as for a church service) in the park. Permits will not be issued for events in the Park’s cemeteries. A SUP is required for portrait photography when conducted at the attached pre-designated locations. For consideration at all other locations, please contact the SUP office listed in the Contacts section. A SUP is required for events at the Appalachian Clubhouse and Spence Cabin, however, the application fee is waived for these locations only. These facilities can be reserved through www.recreation.gov or by calling 877-444-6777. Applicants should not make plans or commitments with vendors based on their proposed location or date and time until they receive a finalized SUP from the park. Applicants should therefore submit their application well in advance of any deadlines for mailing invitations, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Elements of Ground-Water Hydrology with Reference to Conditions in North Carolina by Ralph C Heath
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Basic Elements of Ground-Water Hydrology With Reference to Conditions in North Carolina By Ralph C Heath U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Open-File Report 80-44 Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Natural^ Resources and Community Development Raleigh, North Carolina 1980 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. W. Menard, Director For Additional Information Write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Services Section Post Office Box 2857 Branch of Distribution Box 25425, Federal Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Denver, Colorado 80225 Preface Ground water is one of North Carolina's This report was prepared as an aid to most valuable natural resources. It is the developing a better understanding of the primary source-of water supplies in rural areas ground-water resources of the State. It and is also widely used by industries and consists of 46 essays grouped into five parts. municipalities, especially in the Coastal Plain. The topics covered by these essays range from However, its use is not increasing in proportion the most basic aspects of ground-water to the growth of the State's population and hydrology to the identification and correction economy. Instead, the present emphasis in of problems that affect the operation of supply water-supply development is on large regional wells. The essays were designed both for self systems based on reservoirs on large streams. study and for use in workshops on ground- The value of ground water as a resource not water hydrology and on the development and only depends on its widespread occurrence operation of ground-water supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Enjoy Your North Carolina State Parks
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE PARKS — YOUR STATE PARKS The State Parks described in this booklet portunities for economical vacations—either are the result of planning and development in the modern, fully equipped vacation cabins over a number of years. or in the campgrounds. Endowed by nature with ideal sites that We sincerely believe that North Carolina's range from the shores of the Atlantic Ocean well planned, well located, well equipped and to the tops of the Blue Ridge Mountains, the well maintained State Parks are a matter of State has located its State Parks for easy ac- justifiable pride in which every citizen has a cess as well as for varied appeal. They offer a share. This is earned by your cooperation in choice of homelike convenience and comfort observing the lenient rules and leaving the orderly. in sturdy, modern facilities . the hardy facilities and grounds clean and outdoor life of tenting and camp cooking . Keep this guide book for handy reference or the quick-and-easy freedom of a day's pic- use your State Parks year 'round for healthful nicking. The State Parks offer excellent op- recreation and relaxation! CONTENTS Page General Information 3-7 Information Chart 18-19 Map-Location of State Parks 18-19 Cliffs of the Neuse 8-9 Fort Macon 10-11 Hammocks Beach 12-13 Hanging Rock 14-15 Jones Lake 16-17 Morrow Mountain 20-21 Mount Jefferson 22-23 Mount Mitchell 24-25 Pettigrew 26-27 Reedy Creek 28-29 Singletary Lake 30-31 William B. Umstead 32-33 2 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL INFORMATION The North Carolina State Parks are developed, operated, maintained and administered hy the De- partment of Conservation and Development through its Division of State Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorhead Ph 1 Final Report
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Ecological Assessment of a Wetlands Mitigation Bank August 2001 (Phase I: Baseline Ecological Conditions and Initial Restoration Efforts) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kevin K. Moorhead, Irene M. Rossell, C. Reed Rossell, Jr., and James W. Petranka 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Departments of Environmental Studies and Biology University of North Carolina at Asheville Asheville, NC 28804 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Research and Special Programs Administration May 1, 1994 – September 30, 2001 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, through the Center for Transportation and the Environment, NC State University. 16. Abstract The Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank, the first wetlands mitigation bank in the Blue Ridge Province of North Carolina, was created to compensate for losses resulting from highway projects in western North Carolina. The overall objective for the Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank has been to restore the functional and structural characteristics of the wetlands. Specific ecological restoration objectives of this Phase I study included: 1) reestablishing site hydrology by realigning the stream channel and filling drainage ditches; 2) recontouring the floodplain by removing spoil that resulted from creation of the golf ponds and dredging of the creek; 3) improving breeding habitat for amphibians by constructing vernal ponds; and 4) reestablishing floodplain and fen plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2019 COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Christian Allen University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Allen, Christian, "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Christian Allen entitled "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Julie Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nikwasi Indian Mound
    The Nikwasi Indian Mound The Nikwasi Indian Mound is the last remnant of a Cherokee town of the same name which once stood here on the banks of the Little Tennessee River. The Cherokee Nation towns were divided into Lower, Middle, and Over the Hill Towns. The Middle Towns, of which Nikwasi was one, were found every few miles along the Little Tennessee and its tributaries from its headwaters to the Smokies. While the mound was probably built during the earlier Mississippian Culture, it was the spiritual center of the area. A Council House, or Town House, used for councils, religious ceremonies, and general meetings, was located on top the mound, and the ever-burning sacred fire, which the Cherokee had kept burning since the beginning of their culture, was located there. Thus the mound was a most revered site. The town of Nikwasi was a "white", or peace, town. It was believed that the Nunne'hi, the spirit people, lived under this mound. When James Mooney was studying the legends of the Cherokee for the Smithsonian in 1887 - 1890, he was told the legend of these Spirit Defenders of Nikwasi by an old medicine man name Swimmer. Today it stands as a stately and silent reminder of a time, a culture, and a people of a bygone era. The mound has never been excavated for any reason, agricultural, archeological, or commercial. It stands at near its original height. One cannot truly experience the mound by merely driving by. One must stand at the base to appreciate the size and grace of Nikwasi, and try to envision a time from the past when the mound was surrounded not by busy 21st century traffic and businesses, but by fields, orchards, and a people who lived in complete harmony with the land and the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Nantahala Mountains Geographic Area June 1, 2017
    Nantahala Mountains Geographic Area June 1, 2017 **Disclaimer: The specific descriptions, goals, desired conditions, and objectives only apply to the National Forest System Lands within the Nantahala Mountains Geographic Area. However, nearby communities and surrounding lands are considered and used as context. ** Nantahala Mountains Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017 Description of area A land of large, rounded mountains and lush coves, the Nantahala Mountains Geographic Area contains one of the largest contiguous blocks of National Forest System lands on the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. The geographic area’s vast expanses provide a diverse range of forest uses for visitors and residents. The Nantahala Mountains provide tens of thousands of acres of remote forest areas for visitors and residents to use and explore. From high elevation heath balds like Wayah Bald and weathered rock outcrops to lowland cove and mesic oak/pine forests, the Nantahala Mountains offers a range of biological and scenic diversity special to the National Forests in North Carolina. The geographic area’s large block of contiguous ownership provides visitors with multiple access points for long-distance hiking, rock climbing, hunting, highly developed camping, group camping, horseback riding, and shooting sports at the Dirty John Shooting Range. Anglers enjoy the many creeks and river headwaters, as well as the high mountain Nantahala Lake whose waters flow into the Hiwassee, Nantahala, Little Tennessee, and Tallulah Rivers. These mountains are the setting for multiple Louis L’Amour novels of the famed Sackett family. Communities within this geographic area include Franklin, Andrews, Upper Peachtree, and Nantahala. These communities and others nearby rely on the 175,660 acres of forest land in the geographic area (326,835 acres total).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Data Sheets for the National Park Service
    National Park Service Great American Outdoors Act – National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund Data Sheets for Adjustments to Fiscal Year 2021 Projects NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Project Data Sheet Total Project Score/Ranking: 19.41 Planned Funding FY 2021: $0 (change of -$5,083,000 from FY 2021 list) Funding Source: Legacy Restoration Fund Project Identification Project Title: Purchase and Install 8 Modular Housing Units to Replace Deteriorated Housing Units Parkwide To Be Determined Project Number: GAOA ID #N039, NPS PMIS #311845 Unit/Facility Name: Yellowstone National Park Region/Area/District: Upper Colorado Basin Congressional District: WYAL State: WY Project Justification DOI Asset Code FRPP Unique Id# API: FCI-Before: 0 253314 40 0.00 0 253291 40 0.00 0 253298 40 0.00 0 253264 40 0.00 0 253315 40 0.00 0 253299 40 0.00 0 253290 40 0.00 0 253262 40 0.00 40710900 4272 100 0.70 40710900 4268 88 1.0 40710900 4278 100 0.86 40710900 4274 100 0.10 Project Removal Justification: After the initial project list was submitted, the National Park Service Investment Review Board (IRB) conducted a secondary review and concluded that additional time is needed to scope, evaluate, and plan this investment. Project Description: This project installs up to eight replacement housing units to provide safe and healthy living quarters for NPS employees. The project includes the full scope from purchase to delivery, foundation, installation, and connection to utilities. A previous project funded through Line Item Construction in fiscal year 2020 installed 64 new modular housing units to replace obsolete trailers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryson City Nc Train Schedule
    Bryson City Nc Train Schedule Tobie tenderized contrapuntally. Angelico never surfaced any incumbents arrests forsooth, is Moses Anglian and megalopolitan enough? Aggravating Case protect that Colima Indianizes blamed and segregated poutingly. Train ride comfortable and bryson city and The characters are still in the same place they were before and nothing develops. We would finish the bryson city, those that role of bryson city nc train schedule. There will be a mild, easy hike up to the Waterfall and a snack will be provided. We have your cabin ready! Was about the bridge, and it took thirty minutes to be acknowledged i guess my expectations for this. Password was reset successfully. View the beauty from a different seat, a train seat and experience the thrill of a true operational railroad! Classes of Service for the various Class descriptions and pricing be taking the Nantahala Gorge and back. At the end of the gorge, the route will trace the tracks back to Bryson City. Chris Van Allsburg, the events of the book actually do happen in the movie, though with some serious expansion on the part of the writers and director. Find game schedules and team promotions. Although Santa is a character targeted mainly at children, the message of having faith is a very mature storytelling choice. This included lunch, a tote bag and souvenir cup. Urban Orchard Cider Co. Prices vary by destination. Recognize that you are healthy and subject to bryson city nc without notice now in the leaves are allowed on his reindeer grooming and group adventure to! Passengers switch sides for the return trip, so all have the opportunity to observe the scenery on both sides of the train.
    [Show full text]