DOCSLIB.ORG

Experts and Expertise Interdisciplinary Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Experts and Expertise Interdisciplinary Issues edited by Elisabetta Lalumera Giovanni Tuzet ISSUE 28 – MAY 2015 EDITORIAL MANAGER: DUCCIO MANETTI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: SILVANO ZIPOLI CAIANI - UNIVERSITY OF MILAN VICE DIRECTOR: MARCO FENICI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD JOHN BELL - UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO GIOVANNI BONIOLO - INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION MARIA LUISA DALLA CHIARA - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE DIMITRI D'ANDREA - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE BERNARDINO FANTINI - UNIVERSITÉ DE GENÈVE LUCIANO FLORIDI - UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD MASSIMO INGUSCIO - EUROPEAN LABORATORY FOR NON-LINEAR SPECTROSCOPY GEORGE LAKOFF - UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY PAOLO PARRINI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE ALBERTO PERUZZI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE JEAN PETITOT - CREA, CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN ÉPISTÉMOLOGIE APPLIQUÉE CORRADO SINIGAGLIA - UNIVERSITY OF MILAN BAS C. VAN FRAASSEN - SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY CONSULTING EDITORS CARLO GABBANI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE ROBERTA LANFREDINI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE MARCO SALUCCI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE ELENA ACUTI - UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE MATTEO BORRI - UNIVERSITÉ DE GENÈVE ROBERTO CIUNI - UNIVERSITY OF BOCHUM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Elisabetta Lalumera, Giovanni Tuzet Experts and Expertise. Interdisciplinary Issues III PAPERS Carlo Martini The Paradox Of Proof And Scientific Expertise 1 Christian Dahlman, Lena Wahlberg, Farhan Sarwar Robust Trust in Expert Testimony 17 Susan Haack The Expert Witness: Lessons from the U.S. Experience 39 Ronald J. Allen A Note To My Philosophical Friends About Expertise And Legal Systems 71 Elisabetta Lalumera Overcoming Expert Disagreement In A Delphi Process. An Exercise In Reverse Epistemology 87 Matt Stichter Philosophical and Psychological Accounts of Expertise and Experts 105 Ben Trubody A Paradigm for Your Thoughts: A Kuhnian Analysis of Expertise 129 Gloria Origgi What Is An Expert That A Person May Trust Her? Towards A Political Epistemology Of Expertise 159 Suzanne Uniacke Responsibility, Expertise and Trust: Institutional Ethics Committees and Science 169 Itay Snir Experts Of Common Sense: Philosophers, Laypeople And Democratic Politics 187 Jean-Marie Chevalier The Day After The Day Of The Experts. Lessons From J.M. Cattell, B.I. Gilman And C.S. Peirce 211 Francesca Ervas (Becoming) Experts In Meaning Ambiguities 225 BOOK REVIEWS Federico José Arena Democracy, expertise, and academic freedom: a First Amendment jurisprudence for the modern state by Robert C. Post 245 Fabrizio Esposito Nudge and the Law by Alberto Alemanno and Anne-Lise Sibony (Eds.) 255 Introduction Experts and Expertise. Interdisciplinary Issues Elisabetta Lalumera † [email protected] Giovanni Tuzet ‡ [email protected] Today the role of experts is pervasive in the everyday life of both individuals and communities. At the collective level, governments and groups routinely delegate scientific, economic and technological decisions to experts; expert witnesses play a key role in legal contexts, and the evaluation of academic and scientific institutions is demanded to expert peers. At the individual level, each of us defers to experts for the correct understanding of problems, issues, concepts and word meanings in some domains, and trusts experts blindly at least in some cases. Finally, both communities and individuals face the problem of what to do when experts disagree. The study of experts and expertise lies at the intersection of cognitive and social psychology, epistemology, economics, philosophy of law, and philosophy of language, but the various perspectives seldom meet together. For these reasons, we think it is timely to pose fundamental questions on the notions of expert and expertise in an interdisciplinary manner, so that issues raised within a specific debate may find solutions and integrations from other debates. The aim of this issue of the present journal is to collect a variety of points of view on the topics of experts and expertise, with a special focus on the following issues: what experts are, and what the criteria are for individuating them; how expert cognition differs from layperson cognition in specific domains; † Università degli Studi Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy. ‡ Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2015, Vol. 28, III–V IV Humana.Mente – Issue 28 – May 2015 whether and to what extent it is rational to trust experts, provided that we cannot assess their competence; how it is correct to characterize experts’ disagreement, and what we are to do when experts disagree. Thus the essays collected here range from theoretical questions about expertise to practical ones related to expert knowledge and advice. Among the former, some of the contributions discuss the features of expertise not only to better grasp it but also to distinguish true experts from fake ones, or at least reliable from less reliable expert opinions. Among the latter, several contributions touch upon the issue of democracy in the age of expertise, starting from the assumption that expertise applied to political, legal and economic decisions is in tension – to say the least – with the idea that citizens should be on the same footing when public decisions are made. It is not surprising that it is so. On the one hand, it seems perfectly reasonable to defer to expert cognition and have a world characterized by some division of the cognitive labor. On the other hand, it seems equally reasonable to let people decide what they want from life and institutions. For instance, should expert medical advice constrain our habits and lifestyle in general? Should expert economic advice constrain governments? Should expert forensic opinions constrain judges and juries? If not, why ask them to give their advice? If yes, why not let them decide in the first place what is good for us as individuals and communities? There is an easy way-out, in theory. It is the salutary Humean division of questions of fact and questions of value. Emphatically put, it is the fact/value dichotomy that saves us from all sorts of expert confusion. If someone gives us expert cognition, they give us a piece of knowledge that we non-experts could not get (or could get at a significantly greater cost). But as a piece of knowledge it simply relates some fact. And according to Hume we cannot infer values from facts. Or, to put it differently, we cannot derive an ought from an is. So, expertise correctly understood does not constrain practical decision in any strong sense. It simply provides knowledge for a better-informed decision- making. In a liberal society, it is good to have some medical advice, but it’s bad to have the physician decide in our place what we should do, eat and drink. Similarly, it is good to have the government supported by economic advice, but it’s bad to have economists decide in place of elected bodies. And it’s good to have judges and juries informed by experts, but it’s bad to let experts decide. It Introduction V is conceptually and logically bad, first and foremost, because knowledge by itself doesn’t tell us what to do, if Hume was right. However, it’s true that in the real world important issues are terribly complex, and it’s often hard to discriminate fact from value, let alone true from fake experts and what to do when experts disagree (which happens almost always). On a philosophical tone, we need also consider the (slippery?) distinction of “knowledge that” and “knowledge how”; the first is theoretical, so to say, and the second practical. Does this blur the Humean division? Is it possible to have an expert practical advice if it expresses a form of “knowledge how”? In addition, what is the relevant notion of “experience” at play here? And what is the appropriate propositional attitude towards expertise? Belief or acceptance? In sum, there are many questions and issues raised by the pervasive role of experts in our world. Of course the present collection doesn’t provide any definitive answer to them, but we think it provides at least some good insight and food for thought. VI Humana.Mente – Issue 28 – May 2015 The Paradox Of Proof And Scientific Expertise Carlo Martini † [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper I criticize the current standards for the acceptability of expert testimony in current US legislation. The standards have been the subject of much academic literature after the Frye and Daubert cases. I expose what I call the Paradox of Proof, and argue that the historical and current standards have sidestepped the problem of determining who is an expert and who is not in a court of law. I then investigate the problem of recognizing expertise from the layperson’s standpoint, and suggest what courses of action the future research ought to take on the problem of identifying expertise. Keywords: expertise, experts, laypeople, proxies, legal proof, demarcation, Harry Collins, Robert Evans. Introduction Living in societies, we rely constantly on the work of others for our needs: we rely on the baker to provide us bread in exchange for money, or on the construction worker to build our house. But reliance on others is not only material, it is also epistemic. Contemporary philosophers and social epistemologists, inspired by what Adam Smith called “division of labor” — he probably had in mind mostly material labor (see Smith, 1976) — have investigated the division of “epistemic labor” among the members of our epistemic communities. Kitcher (1990), focusing on scientific communities,
Recommended publications
  • Examining Nostra Aetate After 40 Years: Catholic-Jewish Relations in Our Time / Edited by Anthony J

    Examining Nostra Aetate After 40 Years: Catholic-Jewish Relations in Our Time / Edited by Anthony J

    EXAMINING NOSTRA AETATE AFTER 40 YEARS EXAMINING NOSTRA AETATE AFTER 40 YEARS Catholic-Jewish Relations in Our Time Edited by Anthony J. Cernera SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY PRESS FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT 2007 Copyright 2007 by the Sacred Heart University Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, contact the Sacred Heart University Press, 5151 Park Avenue, Fairfield, Connecticut 06825 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Examining Nostra Aetate after 40 Years: Catholic-Jewish Relations in our time / edited by Anthony J. Cernera. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-888112-15-3 1. Judaism–Relations–Catholic Church. 2. Catholic Church– Relations–Judaism. 3. Vatican Council (2nd: 1962-1965). Declaratio de ecclesiae habitudine ad religiones non-Christianas. I. Cernera, Anthony J., 1950- BM535. E936 2007 261.2’6–dc22 2007026523 Contents Preface vii Nostra Aetate Revisited Edward Idris Cardinal Cassidy 1 The Teaching of the Second Vatican Council on Jews and Judaism Lawrence E. Frizzell 35 A Bridge to New Christian-Jewish Understanding: Nostra Aetate at 40 John T. Pawlikowski 57 Progress in Jewish-Christian Dialogue Mordecai Waxman 78 Landmarks and Landmines in Jewish-Christian Relations Judith Hershcopf Banki 95 Catholics and Jews: Twenty Centuries and Counting Eugene Fisher 106 The Center for Christian-Jewish Understanding of Sacred Heart University:
  • ZAMPINI-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf

    ZAMPINI-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf

    SOLE E OMBRA: A STUDY OF SIXTEENTH CENTURY HUMOURISM AND GROTESQUE THROUGH THE WORKS OF ANTONFRANCESCO GRAZZINI, L’ACCADEMIA DEGLI HUMIDI, AND L’ACCADEMIA DEGLI INFIAMMATI By Tania Zampini A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October 23, 2013 ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! Abstract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
  • ITALIAN MODERN ART | ISSUE 3: ISSN 2640-8511 Introduction

    ITALIAN MODERN ART | ISSUE 3: ISSN 2640-8511 Introduction

    ITALIAN MODERN ART | ISSUE 3: ISSN 2640-8511 Introduction ITALIAN MODERN ART - ISSUE 3 | INTRODUCTION italianmodernart.org/journal/articles/introduction-3 Raffaele Bedarida | Silvia Bignami | Davide Colombo Methodologies of Exchange: MoMA’s “Twentieth-Century Italian Art” (1949), Issue 3, January 2020 https://www.italianmodernart.org/journal/issues/methodologies-of- exchange-momas-twentieth-century-italian-art-1949/ ABSTRACT A brief overview of the third issue of Italian Modern Art dedicated to the MoMA 1949 exhibition Twentieth-Century Italian Art, including a literature review, methodological framework, and acknowledgments. If the study of artistic exchange across national boundaries has grown exponentially over the past decade as art historians have interrogated historical patterns, cultural dynamics, and the historical consequences of globalization, within such study the exchange between Italy and the United States in the twentieth-century has emerged as an exemplary case.1 A major reason for this is the history of significant migration from the former to the latter, contributing to the establishment of transatlantic networks and avenues for cultural exchange. Waves of migration due to economic necessity in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries gave way to the smaller in size but culturally impactful arrival in the U.S. of exiled Jews and political dissidents who left Fascist Italy during Benito Mussolini’s regime. In reverse, the presence in Italy of Americans – often participants in the Grand Tour or, in the 1950s, the so-called “Roman Holiday” phenomenon – helped to making Italian art, past and present, an important component in the formation of American artists and intellectuals.2 This history of exchange between Italy and the U.S.
  • The Sabbath School Learning Prize Fund 2

    The Sabbath School Learning Prize Fund 2

    Trinitarian Bible Society Founded in 1831 for the circulation of Protestant or uncorrupted versions of the Word of God Officers of the Society General Committee: General Secretary: Mr. D. P. Rowland The Rev. M. H. Watts, Chairman Assistant General Secretary: The Rev. B. G. Felce, M.A., Vice-Chairman Mr. D. Larlham Editorial Manager: The Rev. G. Hamstra, B.A., M.Div., Vice-President Mr. G. W. Anderson Mr. D. Oldham, Vice-President Office Manager: Mr. J. M. Wilson Mr. C. A. Wood, Vice-President Warehouse Manager: Pastor R. A. Clarke, B.Sc., F.C.A., Treasurer Mr. I. A. Docksey Mr. G. Bidston Production Manager: Mr. M. D. N. Thomas Mr. G. R. Burrows, M.A. Mr. G. D. Buss, B.Ed. Quarterly Record Production Team Pastor M. J. Harley General Secretary: D. P. Rowland Mr. A. K. Jones Assistant General Secretary: D. Larlham The Rev. E. T. Kirkland, B.A., Dipl.Th. Production Editor: Dr. D. E. Anderson The Rev. J. MacLeod, M.A. Assistants to the Editor: C. P. Hallihan, R. J. Cooper The Rev. D. Silversides Graphic Designer: P. Hu g h e s The Rev. J. P. Thackway Circulation: J. M. Wilson © Trinitarian Bible Society 2007 All rights reserved. The Trinitarian Bible Society permits Issue Number: 581 reprinting of articles found in our printed and online Quarterly Record provided that prior permission is October to December 2007 obtained and proper acknowledgement is made. Contents The Sabbath School Learning Prize Fund 2 From the Assistant General Secretary 3 The Treasury 6 Abraham’s Love for His Family 7 An Examination of the New King James Version, Part 1 9 Tamil Nadu, Part 1 45 The Word of God Among All Nations 54 Trinitarian Bible Society – Quarterly Record Sabbath School Learning Prize Fund ’...from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures...’ 2 Timothy 3.15 ne thing the Trinitarian Bible Society is doing to encourage and enable Ochildren in the study of God’s Word is the provision of the Sabbath School Learning Prize Fund.
  • View Catalogue

    View Catalogue

    J & J LUBRANO MUSIC ANTIQUARIANS © Marilyn Horne Museum and Exhibit Center, University of Pittsburgh at Bradford Autographs, Prints, & Memorabilia From the Collection of Marilyn Horne Part II: M-Z 6 Waterford Way, Syosset, NY 11791 USA Telephone 516-922-2192 [email protected] www.lubranomusic.com CONDITIONS OF SALE Please order by catalogue name (or number) and either item number and title or inventory number (found in parentheses preceding each item’s price). Please note that all material is in good antiquarian condition unless otherwise described. All items are offered subject to prior sale. We thus suggest either an e-mail or telephone call to reserve items of special interest. Orders may also be placed through our secure website by entering the inventory numbers of desired items in the SEARCH box at the upper right of our homepage. We ask that you kindly wait to receive our invoice to insure availability before remitting payment. Libraries may receive deferred billing upon request. Prices in this catalogue are net. Postage and insurance are additional. New York State sales tax will be added to the invoices of New York State residents. We accept payment by: - Credit card (VISA, Mastercard, American Express) - PayPal to [email protected] - Checks in U.S. dollars drawn on a U.S. bank - International money order - Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT), inclusive of all bank charges (details at foot of invoice) - Automated Clearing House (ACH), inclusive of all bank charges (details at foot of invoice) All items remain the property of J & J Lubrano Music Antiquarians LLC until paid for in full.

  • Leonor Antunes EN the Last Days in Galliate

    Leonor Antunes EN the last days in Galliate Pirelli HangarBicocca Public Program Leonor Antunes The exhibition is accompanied by a series of conferences, video screenings, concerts and guided tours that allow visitors to learn more about various aspects of the artist’s the last days in Galliate work. Discover more on our website. 5 May – 8 October 2017 14 September 2018 - 13 January 2019 Cultural Mediation Curated by Roberta Tenconi To know more about the exhibition ask to our cultural mediators in the space. #ArtToThePeople Pirelli HangarBicocca Via Chiese, 2 20126 Milan IT Opening Hours Thursday to Sunday 10 am – 10 pm Monday to Wednesday closed Contacts T. +39 02 66111573 [email protected] hangarbicocca.org FREE ENTRY Cover image: Heinz Peter Knes Pirelli HangarBicocca 2 Pirelli HangarBicocca Leonor Antunes Through her sculptures and site-specific installations, Leonor Antunes (Lisbon, 1972) explores themes and figures on the margins of 20th-century history of art, design and ar- chitecture, focusing in particular on Modernism and reinter- preting some of its most radical aspects. The artist selects certain compositional details from her meticulous research into the work and creations of art and design personali- ties—mainly female figures—and re-elaborates them in un - expected forms. Her sculptures are born out of architectural details and parts of furniture and objects, which she mea- sures and then duplicates, enlarges, reduces and transforms according to her interpretation. Using a complex research process, Antunes investigates the historical context of the origin of these objects, the concept of making and producing as a form of study and thought, and the social role of art and design as instruments of emancipation and quality of contemporary life.
  • A Brief History of the 32Nd General Congregation of the Society of Jesus

    A Brief History of the 32Nd General Congregation of the Society of Jesus

    STUDIES in the Spirituality of Jesuits BOSTON COLLEGE AUG 1 1 1983 The Society True to Itself: PROPERTY OF BAPST LIBRARY A Brief History of the 32nd General Congregation of the Society of Jesus (December 2, 1974—March 7, 1975) by John W. Padberg, S.J. Published by the American Assistancy Seminar on Jesuit Spirituality, aggiornamento E ^ especially for American Jesuits working out their \ in the spirit of Vatican Council II tof Vol. XV May-September, 1983 Nos. 3 and 4 THE AMERICAN ASSISTANCY SEMINAR ON JESUIT SPIRITUALITY consists of a group of Jesuits from various provinces who are listed below. The members were appointed by the Fathers Provincial of the United States. The Purpose of the Seminar is to study topics pertaining to the spir- itual doctrine and practice of Jesuits, especially American Jesuits, and to communicate the results to the members of the Assistancy. The hope is that this will lead to further discussion among all American Jesuits--in private, or in small groups, or in community meetings. All this is done in the spirit of Vatican Council II's recommendation to religious institutes to recapture the original charismatic inspiration of their founders and to adapt it to the changed circumstances of modern times. The members of the Seminar wel- come reactions or comments in regard to the topics they publish. To achieve these purposes, especially amid today*s pluralistic cul- tures, the Seminar must focus its direct attention sharply, frankly, and specifically on the problems, interests, and opportunities of the Jesuits of the United States. However, many of these, interests are common also to Jes- uits of other regions, or to other priests, religious men or women, or lay men or women.
  • Curriculum Vitae Stephan Hartmann

    Curriculum Vitae Stephan Hartmann

    Curriculum Vitae Stephan Hartmann CONTACT DETAILS Address: Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Geschwister-Scholl- Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany Phone: +49 89 2180 3320, Fax: +49 89 2180 2902 Email: [email protected] URL: stephanhartmann.org CURRENT ACADEMIC POSITIONS Chair of Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and the Study of Religion, LMU Munich Head, Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich Regular Member, Munich Center for Neurosciences, LMU Munich Regular Member, Center for Advanced Studies, LMU Munich Associate Member, Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, LMU Munich Visiting Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tilburg University, The Netherlands Honorary Visiting Professor, Sydney Centre for the Foundations of Science, University of Sydney UNIVERSITY EDUCATION Ph.D. (Philosophy): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1995) M.A. (Magister Artium, Philosophy): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1991) M.Sc. (Diplom, Physics): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1991) B.A. (Zwischenpr¨ufung, Philosophy): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1989) B.Sc. (Vordiplom, Physics): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1989) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Philosophy of science, philosophy of physics, formal epistemology, social epistemology, Bayesian cognitive science AREAS OF COMPETENCE Philosophy of social science, philosophy of psychology, political philosophy 1 ACADEMIC WORK EXPERIENCE Senior Researcher in Residence, Center for Advanced
  • Curriculum Vitae Stephan Hartmann

    Curriculum Vitae Stephan Hartmann

    Curriculum Vitae Stephan Hartmann CONTACT DETAILS Address: Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy; LMU Munich; Ludwigstr. 31; 80539 Munich, Germany Phone: +49 89 2180 3320, Fax: +49 89 2180 2902 Email: [email protected] URL: stephanhartmann.org CURRENT ACADEMIC POSITIONS Chair of Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and the Study of Religion, LMU Munich Head, Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich Associate Member, Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, LMU Munich Scientific Board Member, Munich Center for Neurosciences, LMU Munich Regular Member, Center for Advanced Studies, LMU Munich Visiting Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tilburg University, The Netherlands Honorary Visiting Professor, Sydney Centre for the Foundations of Science, University of Sydney UNIVERSITY EDUCATION Ph.D. (Philosophy): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1995) M.A. (Magister Artium, Philosophy): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1991) M.Sc. (Diplom, Physics): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1991) B.A. (Zwischenpr¨ufung, Philosophy): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1989) B.Sc. (Vordiplom, Physics): Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (1989) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Philosophy of science, philosophy of physics, formal epistemology, social epistemology AREAS OF COMPETENCE Philosophy of social science, philosophy of psychology, political philosophy 1 ACADEMIC WORK EXPERIENCE Visiting Professor, Department of Philosophy, Lund University, Sweden (12/2010– 6/2011)
  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr. and James Thrall Soby's Grand Tour of Italy

    Alfred H. Barr, Jr. and James Thrall Soby's Grand Tour of Italy

    ITALIAN MODERN ART | ISSUE 3: ISSN 2640-8511 Alfred H. Barr, Jr. and James Thrall Soby's Grand Tour of Italy ALFRED H. BARR, JR. AND JAMES THRALL SOBY’S GRAND TOUR OF ITALY 0 italianmodernart.org/journal/articles/alfred-h-barr-jr-and-james-thrall-sobys-grand- Silvia Bignami | Davide Colombo Methodologies of Exchange: MoMA’s “Twentieth-Century Italian Art” (1949), Issue 3, January 2020 ABSTRACT From May to June 1948, and with the approval of MoMA’s trustees, Alfred H. Barr, Jr., and James Thrall Soby did a “grand tour” of Italy, visiting artists, collectors, critics, dealers, museum, and galleries in Milan, Bergamo, Brescia, Rome, Venice, and Florence. Along the way they saw the Fifth Quadriennale in Rome and the Twenty- Fourth Venice Biennale; these, the most important art events of the time, would prove major sources for Barr and Soby as the curators of the 1949 exhibition Twentieth- Century Italian Art. The mission of the journey was double: selecting artworks for the show, and acquiring artworks for MoMA’s collection, which was sparse in its Italian modern art holdings. This essay analyzes how and why Barr and Soby worked to shape a history of Italian modern art within the international context of modernism according to the stylistic genealogy of art that Barr had, since 1936, proposed at MoMA. The details of whom they met; which works they saw and selected, borrowed or purchased; and which works weren’t available makes it possible to better understand the framework of the exhibition. In effect, Barr and Soby’s approach was ambivalent: their desire for autonomy and their strategy of not involving public institutions allowed them to build direct relationships with artists and private collectors.