Reforming Politics: the Covenant Device in Anglo-American Political Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reforming Politics: the Covenant Device in Anglo-American Political Theory Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2007 Reforming Politics: The oC venant Device in Anglo-American Political Theory Glenn A. Moots Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Moots, Glenn A., "Reforming Politics: The oC venant Device in Anglo-American Political Theory" (2007). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3375. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3375 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. REFORMING POLITICS: THE COVENANT DEVICE IN ANGLO-AMERICAN POLITICAL THEORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Glenn A. Moots A.B., The University of Michigan, 1991 M.A., Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1993 M.S., Walsh College, 1996 August, 2007 ©Copyright 2007 Glenn A. Moots All rights reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a great debt to many people. Professor Eubanks first directed my studies when I was a young graduate student and didn’t know how to pursue the intersection of religion and political theory. Professor Stoner has provided invaluable personal and professional mentoring over the years, helping me to see my own potential and encouraging me to return for my PhD when it seemed an impossible transition. Professor Sandoz, with whom I’ve concluded my studies, has demonstrated the most gracious patience and enabled financial support while my professional habits matured. Professor Harry Veryser, formerly of Walsh College, served to mentor me in the interim years and has been a great friend and teacher. Professors Mary Sirridge, William Clark, Francois Raffoul, Gregory Schufreider, and Ed Henderson supervised other projects and coursework. Each enlarged my understanding of many things. “For money is not the standard by which the worth (of a teacher) can be measured, and no honor could match what he has given.” (Nicomachean Ethics 1164b) My colleagues at Northwood have supported this project in many ways. The academic administration (Tim Nash, John Grether, and Gene Beckham) accommodated a research-friendly schedule. Joan Deegan and Rochelle Zimmerman demonstrated dedication above the call of duty to track down research materials. Benedict Hughes sacrificed time to read chapter drafts. Our friends in Baton Rouge have made it a second home for us. They have provided an example of hospitality and graciousness without peer. We fondly call to mind our times with them and hope to return in the years to come. I was particularly blessed to have pastors there (Randy Toms) and in Michigan (Raymond Joseph) who provided an example of intelligent theology always mindful of political questions both ecclesiastical and civil. The Acton Institute and Intercollegiate Studies Institute have been very generous in iii providing funding for this and other research. Without their support I would not have had the time to complete this project. I hope that they find me to be a good fiduciary of their resources. How can I ever thank my wife and children for their great love and encouragement through this and other labors? They are my best friends and co-laborers in all things. They would all say, of course, that families are supposed to support noble and sacrificial tasks. And they are right! But it is no less hard for us to give up time together so that Daddy can sit in front of his books and keyboard. I hope that I have set a good example for them. Here’s praying for life and health to provide payback for missing family time! The author of the Book of Ecclesiastes writes, “The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies, which are given from one shepherd. And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh. Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.” (12:11-13) I am thankful to God’s faithful providence for the skill and circumstance to write this dissertation, and for the ministry and mentoring of many in my learning, writing and teaching over the years. As I complete this and other projects, I pray that the Holy Spirit will fix in my mind that the covenant is ultimately about faithful action over and above the making of many books. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. iii ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... vi SECTION I: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. DEFENDING POLITICAL THEOLOGY ..................................................................... 12 3. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 38 SECTION II: THE POLITICAL THEORY OF THE COVENANT DEVICE CHAPTER 4. THE BIBLICAL COVENANTS ..................................................................................... 59 5. DANIEL ELAZAR'S STUDIES OF POLITICAL COVENANTING .......................... 75 6. THE JEWISH POLITICAL THEOLOGY OF DAVID NOVAK ............................... 102 SECTION III: REFORMED POLITICAL THEOLOGY CHAPTER 7. REVIVAL OF THE COVENANT IN REFORMED THEOLOGY ........................... 128 8. REFORMED POLITICAL THEOLOGY: THE COVENANT AS POLITICS ......... 158 9. THE CASE OF THE BRITISH WARS: COVENANT AND ESCHATOLOGY ...... 181 10. NATURAL LAW IN REFORMED POLITICAL THEOLOGY .............................. 209 11. NATURAL RIGHT IN REFORMED POLITICAL THEOLOGY ........................... 234 SECTION IV: THE AMERICAN COVENANT CHAPTER 12. THE COVENANT DEVICE IN AMERICA ............................................................. 255 SECTION V:CONCLUSION CHAPTER 13. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 288 WORKS CITED ................................................................................................................. 302 VITA ................................................................................................................................ 322 v ABSTRACT This dissertation provides an historical and theoretical inquiry into “covenants” as a device within Anglo-American political theory. It includes an overview of Biblical covenants which are the source of the covenant device, together with an analysis of subsequent application by early modern and contemporary political theorists. I demonstrate that this revealed political theology, moderated by the political traditions of salus populi and natural law, provides support for contemporary political imperatives of liberty while avoiding both the terrors of gnostic political religion and the inevitable moral and political failure of natural political theology. The argument begins with an examination of contemporary covenantal theory in the scholarship of Daniel Elazar and David Novak. I then turn to the revival of the covenant device during the British Reformation and American colonial experience. As background, the dissertation surveys Calvin, Bullinger, Buchanan, Knox, Goodman, Mornay, and Rutherford (among others) and their prescriptions for the form of government and for resistance theory. I also examine important events during the British Civil Wars and the implications of the covenant device therein. Reformed theologians demonstrate both unity and diversity in their approach to political questions. In formulating political theory around the covenant device, they collectively create a provocative and valuable political theology par excellence with important implications for liberalism, republicanism, and constitutionalism. The dissertation pays close attention to the ways in which theological differences had explicit and implicit consequence for political theory. Those differences include the varying approaches of Reformed theologians to the covenants of works and grace respectively, the visible and invisible Church, and the accommodation of natural law, common law, and natural right. vi SECTION I INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Subject of the Dissertation This dissertation provides an exploration of “covenants” as a device used within the development of Anglo-American political theology and political theory. It researches the covenant device both historically and theoretically. The covenant device is ultimately derived from the Bible and from systematic theologies. It is a theological concept with implications for political theory. The dissertation is therefore primarily a study of political theology 1.2 Political Theology Defined The term used to categorize this study, “political theology,” requires some explanation. A brief defense of the term may be helpful, including my choice to use it instead of the term
Recommended publications
  • Pat-Abendroth-Dissertation.Pdf
    A Pastoral Note About My Doctoral Project I am glad you are interested in reading my dissertation. Given that it took a fair amount of effort and my passion for the subject matter, I am happy to share it with church members and friends. Please allow me to introduce you to the project by saying just a few things. If you ask someone what Covenant Theology is and if it is a good or bad thing, you will likely hear lots of different answers. It is fairly common for evangelicals to respond by either saying they do not know what Covenant Theology is or by describing it as something unbiblical and relating to a particular view regarding millennialism, baptism, or Israel. There are three major problems with such responses. First, classic Covenant Theology is essentially concerned with matters of sin and salvation, not something else. Second, the biblical support for such things as the federal headship of Adam and Jesus is strong (federal being from the Latin foedus meaning covenant). Third, when Covenant Theology is rejected, justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone is at best in serious jeopardy. My dissertation is a promotion and defense of classic Covenant Theology. I have written out of a pastoral passion to help people understand human history federally/covenantally just as the Apostle Paul did as he wrote inspired Scripture (see Romans 5:12-21). Likewise, I have written in order to demonstrate the vital connection between Covenant Theology and justification by faith alone, the doctrine that is so commonly compromised by rejecters of the federal perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Calvin and Witsius on the Mosaic Covenant
    1 1 Calvin and Witsius on the Mosaic Covenant J. V. FESKO hen it comes to the Mosaic covenant, an ocean of ink has been spilled by theologians in their efforts to relate it both to WIsrael’s immediate historical context and to the church’s exis- tence in the wake of the advent of Christ. Anthony Burgess (d. 1664), one of the Westminster divines, writes: “I do not find in any point of divinity, learned men so confused and perplexed (being like Abraham’s ram, hung in a bush of briars and brambles by the head) as here.”1 Among the West- minster divines there were a number of views represented in the assembly: the Mosaic covenant was a covenant of works, a mixed covenant of works and grace, a subservient covenant to the covenant of grace, or simply the covenant of grace.2 One can find a similar range of views represented in more recent literature in our own day.3 In the limited amount of space 1. Anthony Burgess, Vindicae Legis (London, 1647), 229. 2. Samuel Bolton, The True Bounds of Christian Freedom (1645; Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 2001), 92–94. 3. See, e.g., Mark W. Karlberg, “Reformed Interpretation of the Mosaic Covenant,” Westmin- ster Theological Journal 43.1 (1981): 1–57; idem, Covenant Theology in Reformed Perspective (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2000), 17–58; D. Patrick Ramsey, “In Defense of Moses: A Confes- sional Critique of Kline and Karlberg,” Westminster Theological Journal 66.2 (2004): 373–400; 25 Estelle Law Book.indd 35 12/12/08 3:36:48 PM 26 J.
    [Show full text]
  • 27882 CTJ NOV05 Text.Qxp
    CTJ 40 (2005): 248-266 The Two Kingdoms: A Reassessment of the Transformationist Calvin1 David VanDrunen At least since the appearance of H. Richard Niebuhr’s classic study, Christ and Culture,2 those advocating a transformationist approach to cultural issues have often claimed John Calvin as one of their own. Although the term trans- formation is somewhat ambiguous, capable of various permutations, the idea behind it suggests a conviction not only that Christians ought to adopt a posi- tive stance toward cultural engagement but also that they should aim to bring the effects of God’s redemptive work in Christ to bear upon the various spheres of culture.3 Although thinkers of other theological persuasions have flocked to embrace one or another version of the transformationist paradigm, Reformed theologians of late have claimed transformationism as the Reformed approach to culture and even as a chief characteristic of Reformed Christianity alto- gether. Many of these contemporary Reformed theologians find inspiring precedent in the labors of the great Dutch theologian, journalist, and states- man Abraham Kuyper, who sought to infuse the various spheres of life with the claims of Christ. Beyond Kuyper, many Reformed theologians look back to Calvin himself and, with Niebuhr, find a representative of the transformation- ist vision.4 Is such a characterization of Calvin helpful and accurate? In this article, I argue that Calvin’s approach to cultural and social matters diverges at crucial 1 An earlier version of this article was presented at the Symposium on Religion and Politics, sponsored by the Henry Institute at Calvin College, on April 30, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion
    A (New) Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion Guillermo René Cavieses Araya Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Faculty of Arts School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science February 2019 1 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from this thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2019 The University of Leeds and Guillermo René Cavieses Araya The right of Guillermo René Cavieses Araya to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Guillermo René Cavieses Araya in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. 2 Acknowledgements No man is an island, and neither is his work. This thesis would not have been possible without the contribution of a lot of people, going a long way back. So, let’s start at the beginning. Mum, thank you for teaching me that it was OK for me to dream of working for a circus when I was little, so long as I first went to University to get a degree on it. Dad, thanks for teaching me the value of books and a solid right hook. To my other Dad, thank you for teaching me the virtue of patience (yes, I know, I am still working on that one).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Sacrifices in the Millennium
    Scholars Crossing Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 Why Sacrifices in The Millennium Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "Why Sacrifices in The Millennium" (2009). Article Archives. 60. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/60 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHY LITERAL SACRIFICES IN THE MILLENNIUM Tom's Perspectives by Thomas Ice A common objection to the consistent literal interpretation of Bible prophecy is found in Ezekiel’s Temple vision (Ezek. 40—48). Opponents argue that if this is a literal, future Temple, then it will require a return to the sacrificial system that Christ made obsolete since the prophet speaks of “atonement” (kiper) in Ezekiel 43:13, 27; 45:15, 17, 20. This is true! Critics believe this to be a blasphemous contradiction to the finished work of Christ as presented in Hebrews 10. Hank Hanegraaff says that I have “exacerbated the problem by stating that without animal sacrifices in the Millennium, Yahweh’s holiness would be defiled. That, for obvious reasons, is blasphemous.” He further says that such a view constitutes a return “to Old Covenant sacrifices.”1 “Is it heretical to believe that a Temple and sacrifices will once again exist,” ask John Schmitt and Carl Laney? “Ezekiel himself believed it was a reality and the future home of Messiah.
    [Show full text]
  • Birthright Democracy: Nationhood and Constitutional Self-Government in History
    BIRTHRIGHT DEMOCRACY: NATIONHOOD AND CONSTITUTIONAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IN HISTORY By Ethan Alexander-Davey A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2013 Date of final oral examination: 8/16/13 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Richard Avramenko, Political Science Daniel Kapust, Political Science James Klausen, Political Science Howard Schweber, Political Science Johann Sommerville, History i Abstract How did constitutionally limited government and democracy emerge in the West? Many scholars from many different perspectives have attempted to answer this question. I identify the emergence of these forms of self-government with early modern nationalism. Broadly speaking, nationalism of the right sort provides indispensable resources both for united popular resistance against autocratic rule, and for the formation and legitimation of national systems self- governance. Resistance and self-government both require a national consciousness that includes a myth of national origin, a national language, a common faith, and, crucially, native traditions of self-government, and stories of heroic ancestors who successfully defended those traditions against usurpers and tyrants. It is through national consciousness that abstract theories of resistance and self-government become concrete and tenable. It is though national fellowship that the idea of a political nation, possessing the right to make rulers accountable to its will, comes into existence and is sustained over time. My arguments basically fall under two headings, historical and theoretical. By an examination of the nationalist political thought of early modern European countries, I intend to establish important historical connections between the rise of nationalism and the emergence of self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fulfillment of the Millennial Kingdom Revelation 20:1-6; Isaiah 9:6-7; 2:3-4; 32:1-4 Outline
    P a g e | 1 Kingdom, 2013 The Fulfillment of the Millennial Kingdom Revelation 20:1-6; Isaiah 9:6-7; 2:3-4; 32:1-4 Outline Introduction: The idea of a perfect social order where peace and prosperity exist has always occupied the minds of thinking people since Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden. Long before any utopian theoretical societies were conceived, the Bible described a golden age that is coming to earth, called the Millennium. The Millennium is a biblical theme that describes a golden age on earth when Jesus will rule as King and God’s purposes will be perfectly done on earth as it is in heaven. The Millennial Kingdom comes at the end times - Christ’s reign on earth for 1000 years. Revelation 20:1-6 The Millennial Reign of Christ is the fulfillment of God’s promises to Israel. 1. God’s promise to King David was unconditional and eternal. Davidic Covenant - 2 Samuel 7:16 2. Jesus, and only Jesus, fulfills the messianic promises related to God’s covenant with David. Isaiah 9:6-7; Luke 1:31-33; Mark 11:9-10 3. Jerusalem will be the capital of the earth and the geographical location of the throne of Jesus. Isaiah 62:6-7; Jeremiah 3:17; Zechariah 8:3 4. God made promises to the prophets of a coming golden era: a. A golden era with a perfect government under one perfect King - Isaiah 24:23; Zechariah 14:9; 1 Corinthians 15:24-25 b. A golden era with a perfectly restored Creation - Romans 8:19-20; Isaiah 11:6-9; Isaiah 65:25; Isaiah 32:1-4 c.
    [Show full text]
  • Covenant Theology in Reformed Perspective
    COVENANT THEOLOGY IN REFORMED PERSPECTIVE Collected essays and book reviews in historical, biblical, and systematic theology Mark W. Karlberg Wipf and Stock Publihsers 150 West Broadway, Eugene OR 97401 Made available electronically through Two Age Press Covenant Theology in Reformed Perspective By Karlberg, Mark W. Copyright©2000 by Karlberg, Mark W. ISBN: 1-57910-315-4 (For the bound printed version) Printed by Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2000. This book is reprinted electronially by Two Age Press on behalf of Wipf & Stock Publishers. The original bound copy by Wipf and Stock differs slightly in pagi- nation. Dedicated to my parents and aunt, Dorothy Bloser, For their spiritual discernment in the things of the Lord And their sacrifice in the struggle for the faith in our generation. Soli Deo gloria Permission to republish material was granted by: Calvin Theilogical Journal The Evangelical Quarterly Foundations Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society Trinity Journal The Westminster Theological Journal and by John Muether and Howard Griffith, editors, Creator, Redeemer, and Consummator: Essays in Biblical Theology Presented to Meredith G. Kline Collection of Articles CHAPTER ONE: “Reformed Interpretation of the Mosaic Covenant,” The Westminster Theological Journal 43 (1980) 1-57. CHAPTER TWO: “Reformation Politics: The Relevance of OT Ethics in Calvinist Political Theory,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 29 (1986) 179-91. CHAPTER THREE: “Moses and Christ: The Place of Law in Seventeenth-Centu- ry Puritanism,” Trinity Journal 10 NS (1989) 11-32. CHAPTER FOUR: “The Original State of Adam: Tensions in Reformed Theolo- gy,”The Evangelical Quarterly 59 (1987) 291-309. CHAPTER FIVE: “Covenant Theology and the Westminster Tradition,” WTJ 54 (1992) 135-52.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnston of Warriston
    F a m o u s Sc o t s S e r i e s Th e following Volum es are now ready M S ARLYLE H ECT O R . M C HERSO . T HO A C . By C A P N LL N R M Y O L H T SM E T O . A A A SA . By IP AN A N H U GH MI R E T H LE SK . LLE . By W. K I A H K ! T LOR INN Es. JO N NO . By A . AY R ERT U RNS G BR EL SET OUN. OB B . By A I L D O H GE E. T H E BA L A I ST S. By J N DDI RD MER N Pro fe sso H ER KLESS. RICH A CA O . By r SIR MES Y SI MPSON . EV E L T R E S M SO . JA . By B AN Y I P N M R P o fesso . G R E BLA I KIE. T HOMAS CH AL E S. By r r W A D N MES S ELL . E T H LE SK. JA BO W . By W K I A I M L E OL H T SME T O . T OB AS S O L T T . By IP AN A N U G . T O MON D . FLET CHER O F SA LT O N . By . W . R U P Sir GEOR E DO L S. T HE BLACKWOOD G O . By G UG A RM M LEOD OH ELL OO .
    [Show full text]
  • How English Baptists Changed the Early Modern Toleration Debate
    RADICALLY [IN]TOLERANT: HOW ENGLISH BAPTISTS CHANGED THE EARLY MODERN TOLERATION DEBATE Caleb Morell Dr. Amy Leonard Dr. Jo Ann Moran Cruz This research was undertaken under the auspices of Georgetown University and was submitted in partial fulfillment for Honors in History at Georgetown University. MAY 2016 I give permission to Lauinger Library to make this thesis available to the public. ABSTRACT The argument of this thesis is that the contrasting visions of church, state, and religious toleration among the Presbyterians, Independents, and Baptists in seventeenth-century England, can best be explained only in terms of their differences over Covenant Theology. That is, their disagreements on the ecclesiological and political levels were rooted in more fundamental disagreements over the nature of and relationship between the biblical covenants. The Baptists developed a Covenant Theology that diverged from the dominant Reformed model of the time in order to justify their practice of believer’s baptism. This precluded the possibility of a national church by making baptism, upon profession of faith, the chief pre- requisite for inclusion in the covenant community of the church. Church membership would be conferred not upon birth but re-birth, thereby severing the links between infant baptism, church membership, and the nation. Furthermore, Baptist Covenant Theology undermined the dominating arguments for state-sponsored religious persecution, which relied upon Old Testament precedents and the laws given to kings of Israel. These practices, the Baptists argued, solely applied to Israel in the Old Testament in a unique way that was not applicable to any other nation. Rather in the New Testament age, Christ has willed for his kingdom to go forth not by the power of the sword but through the preaching of the Word.
    [Show full text]
  • The Documentary History of the Westminster Assembly
    THE P KESBYTERIAN REVIEW. MANAGING EDITORS : ARCHIBALD A. HODGE, CHARLES A. BRIGGS. ASSOCIATE EDITORS : SAMUEL J. WILSON, JAMES EELLS, FRANCIS L. PATTON, RANSOM B. WELCH, TALBOT W. CHAMBERS. VOLUME I. 1880. NEW YORK: Published for the Presbyterian Review Association, by ANSON D. F. RANDOLPH & COMPANY, 900 BROADWAY, COR. 20th STREET. COPYRIGHT, iSSo, BY A. D. F. RANDOLPH * CO. Edward 0. Jenkins, Printer and Stereotyper, jo North William St., New York. TABLE OF CONTENTS. JANUARY. I.— IDEA AND AIMS OF THE PRESBYTERIAN REVIEW, . 3 The Editors. II.— HUME, HUXLEY, AND MIRACLES 8 Prof. W. G. T. Shedd, D.D., LL.D. III.— JUVENAL'S HISTORICAL JUDGMENTS 34 Prof. W. A. Packard, Ph.D. IV.— THE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE TESTAMENTS OF THE XII PATRIARCHS 57 Prof. B. B. Warfield, D.D. V.— NOTES ON THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION IN THE REFORMED CHURCHES OF FRANCE AND FRENCH SWITZER LAND 85 Prof. H. M. Baird, D.D. VI.— RAVENNA 104 Rev. M. R. Vincent, D.D. VII.— DOCUMENTARY HISTORY OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEM BLY 127 Prof. C. A. Briggs, D.D. VIII.— NOTES AND NOTICES 164 IX.— REVIEWS OF RECENT THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE, . 172 APRIL. I.— THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, 211 Prof. W. J. Beecher, D.D. II.— THE CHINESE IN AMERICA 247 Prof. James Eells, D.D. III.— DEACONESSES 268 Prof. A. T. McGill, D.D., LL.D. IV.— HENRY VAUGHAN, THE POET OF LIGHT 291 Rev. S. W. Duffield. V.— THE THEORY OF PROFESSOR KUENEN 304 Rev. T. W. Chambers, D.D. VI.— A PLEA FOR EVANGELICAL APOLOGETICS, . , . 321 Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1641 Lords' Subcommittee on Religious Innovation
    A “Theological Junto”: the 1641 Lords’ subcommittee on religious innovation Introduction During the spring of 1641, a series of meetings took place at Westminster, between a handful of prominent Puritan ministers and several of their Conformist counterparts. Officially, these men were merely acting as theological advisers to a House of Lords committee: but both the significance, and the missed potential, of their meetings was recognised by contemporary commentators and has been underlined in recent scholarship. Writing in 1655, Thomas Fuller suggested that “the moderation and mutual compliance of these divines might have produced much good if not interrupted.” Their suggestions for reform “might, under God, have been a means, not only to have checked, but choked our civil war in the infancy thereof.”1 A Conformist member of the sub-committee agreed with him. In his biography of John Williams, completed in 1658, but only published in 1693, John Hacket claimed that, during these meetings, “peace came... near to the birth.”2 Peter Heylyn was more critical of the sub-committee, in his biography of William Laud, published in 1671; but even he was quite clear about it importance. He wrote: Some hoped for a great Reformation to be prepared by them, and settled by the grand committee both in doctrine and discipline, and others as much feared (the affections of the men considered) that doctrinal Calvinism being once settled, more alterations would be made in the public liturgy... till it was brought more near the form of Gallic churches, after the platform of Geneva.3 A number of Non-conformists also looked back on the sub-committee as a missed opportunity.
    [Show full text]