DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Rule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Friday, July 25, 2008 Part III Department of Agriculture Forest Service 36 CFR Part 294 Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation; Applicability to the National Forests in Colorado; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:12 Jul 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\25JYP3.SGM 25JYP3 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS 43544 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 144 / Friday, July 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE public viewing at Forest Service district protection of our roadless areas,’’ given and supervisor’s offices within the State ongoing legal uncertainty. The 2007 Forest Service of Colorado. petition took into account State and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: local resource management challenges 36 CFR Part 294 Colorado Roadless Rule Team Leader along with the national interest in maintaining roadless characteristics and RIN 0596–AC74 Kathy Kurtz at (303) 275–5083. Individuals using telecommunication the need for management flexibility in Special Areas; Roadless Area devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the certain circumstances. Conservation; Applicability to the Federal Information Relay Service The Roadless Area Conservation National Forests in Colorado (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 National Advisory Committee a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, (RACNAC) reviewed the 2007 petition AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA Forest Monday through Friday. on June 13 and 14, 2007, in Washington, Service. DC. Harris Sherman, executive director SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; of the Colorado Department of Natural request for comment. Background Resources, representing Governor Ritter, described the scope and intent of the As a leader in natural resource SUMMARY: The Forest Service, U.S. 2007 petition. The RACNAC also heard conservation, the Forest Service Department of Agriculture (USDA), is comments from other State and Forest provides direction for the management proposing to establish a State-specific Service officials, task force members, and use of the Nation’s forests, rule to provide management direction and members of the public. On August rangeland, and aquatic ecosystems for conserving Colorado roadless areas. 8, 2007, the RACNAC issued a under its jurisdiction. Similarly, the The USDA invites written comments on unanimous consensus-based State of Colorado is committed to both the proposed rule and the draft recommendation to the Secretary to sustained natural resource use and environmental impact statement (DEIS) direct the Forest Service, with the State conservation of State and Federal land and will consider those comments in of Colorado as a cooperating agency, to within its borders. Furthermore, the developing a final rule and final proceed with rulemaking based on the Forest Service is charged to collaborate environmental impact statement (FEIS). 2007 petition. cooperatively with states and other The final rule will be published in the After reviewing the RACNAC’s interested parties regarding the use and Federal Register. recommendation, the Secretary accepted management of the National Forest the 2007 petition on August 24, 2007, DATES: Comments must be received in System (NFS). writing 90 days from the date the rule and directed the Forest Service to initiate rulemaking based on the is published in the Federal Register. State of Colorado Petition petition. The proposed rule would ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via On July 14, 2005, the State of respond to the 2007 petition by e-mail to [email protected]. Colorado announced it would submit a establishing a system of Colorado Comments also may be submitted via petition requesting specific regulatory Roadless Areas (CRAs) with protections the internet at http:// protections for the inventoried roadless for these areas that would supersede the www.regulations.gov. Written comments areas within the State. The State’s 2001 Roadless Rule. concerning this notice should be commitment to participate was The USDA, State, and Forest Service addressed to Roadless Area evidenced by Senate Bill 05–243, the are committed to conserving and Conservation—Colorado, P.O. Box ‘‘Roadless Areas Review Task Force’’ managing roadless areas and consider 162909, Sacramento, CA 95816–2909, or legislation signed into law on June 8, these areas an important and via facsimile to 916–456–6724. 2005. The bill outlined membership and exceptional component of the NFS. The All comments, including names and responsibilities of a 13-member USDA, State, and Forest Service believe addresses, when provided, are placed in bipartisan task force to make the most viable path for lasting the record and are available for public recommendations to the Governor conservation of these areas is through inspection and copying. regarding inventoried roadless areas in properly integrating local, State, and A copy of this proposed rule, draft NFS lands in Colorado. The task force national perspectives on roadless area environmental impact statement (DEIS), held nine public meetings throughout management on NFS lands located the DEIS summary, dates and locations the State, reviewed over 40,000 public within the State of Colorado. of public meetings, and other comments, and conducted a Through a memorandum of information related to this rulemaking comprehensive review of Colorado’s 4.4 understanding dated January 8, 2008, will be available at the national roadless million acres of roadless areas (2001 the State of Colorado was granted Web site http://www.roadless.fs.fed.us. Roadless Rule). cooperating agency status with the Reviewers may request printed copies or Colorado’s petition (2006 petition) Forest Service, under 40 CFR 1508.5, for compact disks of the DEIS and the was submitted to the Secretary of the preparation of the environmental summary by writing to Colorado Agriculture for consideration on impact statement (EIS) associated with Roadless Team/Planning, USDA Forest November 13, 2006, by then-Governor this rulemaking. Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Owens with the provision it be Within the 2007 petition, the State Office, 740 Simms Street, Golden, CO considered under section 553(e) of the requested the Colorado Department of 80401–4720, or by e-mail to comments- Administrative Procedure Act and Natural Resources and/or the Colorado rocky-mountain-regional- USDA regulations at 7 CFR 1.28. On Division of Wildlife be offered [email protected], or by Fax to 303–275– April 11, 2007, Governor Ritter cooperating agency status to assure 5134. When ordering, requesters must resubmitted the 2006 petition with a participation in the evaluation of future specify their address, if they wish to substantive letter of transmittal, which proposed activities in CRAs associated receive the summary or full set of became the 2007 petition. Governor with Federal coal reserves under certain documents, and if the material should Ritter’s transmittal letter requested that lands in the North Fork coal mining area be provided in print or compact disk. state-specific rulemaking be undertaken on the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Printed copies will be available for to provide an ‘‘insurance policy for Gunnison National Forests, and VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:23 Jul 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25JYP3.SGM 25JYP3 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 144 / Friday, July 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules 43545 proposed activities associated with ski agency status, the Forest Service will through revised forest plans (Arapaho area lands proposed for removal from coordinate with the State. and Roosevelt, Routt, Rio Grande and roadless designation, listed in Table 2. National Forest System Land White River National Forests) and In addition, the Forest Service will offer Inventories in Colorado ongoing forest plan revisions (Grand cooperating agency status to the State Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison; where it expresses an interest for any The 2007 petition proposed using the San Juan; Pike and San Isabel; and 2001 Roadless Rule inventoried roadless Forest Service project or planning Manti-La Sal National Forests). Finally, areas as a basis for identifying CRAs. activity on NFS lands located within the 2007 petition identified that certain These inventories would be updated by CRAs, pursuant to the Council on technical corrections to the inventory, portions of ski areas (described in Table Environmental Quality implementing such as but not limited to, 2) were not to be included in CRAs. National Environmental Policy Act congressionally-designated areas as Table 1 displays the acreage changes (NEPA) regulations at 40 CFR 1500– defined in Table 3, land exchanges, and between the 2001 inventoried roadless 1508. Where the Forest Service does not any boundary line revisions including areas (IRAs) and the proposed CRA have the authority to grant cooperating additions and deletions to the inventory boundaries. TABLE 1.—NET CHANGE IN ROADLESS ACRES DESIGNATIONS BY FOREST—INVENTORIED ROADLESS AREA ACRES TO COLORADO ROADLESS AREA ACRES Congression- ally designated Total IRA Net change 2001 Rule as wilderness acres without IRA acres not Unroaded Total roadless between IRA total IRA or special congression- included within acres added to 1 2 acres in CRAs and CRA acres areas not ally designated CRAs CRAs acres included in acres IRAs or CRAs Arapaho-Roosevelt ...... 391,000 (37,000) 354,000 (5,000) 1,000 350,000 (4,000) (1997) GMUG .......................... 1,127,000 (67,000) 1,060,000 (329,000) 120,000 853,000 (207,000) (1979) (2005 draft) Pike-San Isabel ............ 688,000 (19,000) 669,000 (77,000) 82,000 674,000 5,000 (1979) (2006 draft) Rio Grande ................... 530,000 530,000 (16,000) 4,000 518,000 (12,000) (1996) Routt ............................. 442,000 442,000 (10,000) 2,000 434,000 (8,000) (1998) San Juan ...................... 604,000 (60,000) 544,000 (84,000) 99,000 558,000 14,000 (1979) (2006 draft) White River .................. 640,000 640,000 (5,000) 1,000 636,000 (4,000) (2002) Manti La Sal in Colo- rado .......................... 11,000 11,000 (4,000) 500 8,000 (3,000) (1979) (2006 draft) Total State of Colo- rado ..................
Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    l 122 EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL ASPECTS OPEN FILE REPORT 92-2 EARTHQUAKES AND Ludwin, R. S.; Malone, S. D.; Crosson, R. EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Washington SEISMOLOGY - 1946 EVENT ASPECTS eanhquak:es, 1985. Clague, J. J., 1989, Research on eanh- Ludwin, R. S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Reeval­ Perkins, J. B.; Moy, Kenneth, 1989, Llabil­ quak:e-induced ground failures in south­ uation of the 19th century Washington ity of local government for earthquake western British Columbia [abstract). and Oregon eanhquake catalog using hazards and losses-A guide to the law Evans, S. G., 1989, The 1946 Mount Colo­ original accounts-The moderate sized and its impacts in the States of Califor­ nel Foster rock avalanches and auoci­ earthquake of May l, 1882 [abstract). nia, Alaska, Utah, and Washington; ated displacement wave, Vancouver Is­ Final repon. Maley, Richard, 1986, Strong motion accel­ land, British Columbia. erograph stations in Oregon and Wash­ Hasegawa, H. S.; Rogers, G. C., 1978, EARTHQUAKES AND ington (April 1986). Appendix C Quantification of the magnitude 7.3, SEISMOLOGY - NETWORKS Malone, S. D., 1991, The HAWK seismic British Columbia earthquake of June 23, AND CATALOGS data acquisition and analysis system 1946. [abstract). Berg, J. W., Jr.; Baker, C. D., 1963, Oregon Hodgson, E. A., 1946, British Columbia eanhquak:es, 1841 through 1958 [ab­ Milne, W. G., 1953, Seismological investi­ earthquake, June 23, 1946. gations in British Columbia (abstract). stract). Hodgson, J. H.; Milne, W. G., 1951, Direc­ Chan, W.W., 1988, Network and array anal­ Munro, P. S.; Halliday, R. J.; Shannon, W.
  • OPEN SPACE and DEVELOPMENT in the UPPER EAST RIVER VALLEY Open Space Subdivided Land & Single Family Residences Parcel Boundaries C.C

    OPEN SPACE and DEVELOPMENT in the UPPER EAST RIVER VALLEY Open Space Subdivided Land & Single Family Residences Parcel Boundaries C.C

    K E TO SCHOFIELD E R C R E MAROON BELLS P P SNOWMASS WILDERNESS O C GOTHIC MOUNTAIN GOTHIC TOWNSITE TEOCALLI MOUNTAIN (RMBL) Gothic Mountain Subdivision Washington Gulch (CBLT) Glee Biery C.E. Maxfield Meadows C.E. The Bench (CBLT) (CBLT) C.E. (CBLT) Rhea Easement C O U N T SNODGRASS MOUNTAIN Y 3 1 7 W E A A S S S L H T A IN T G R E T IV O E R N R I V G E U L R C The Reserve (C.E.) H R (COL) D RAGGEDS WILDERNESS Smith Hill #1 (CBLT) Divine C.E. (CBLT) Meridian Lake Park D R C I M H E T R MERIDIAN LAKE PARK O I G Gunsight D RESERVOIR I Bridge A Prospect C.A. N K Parcel CREE FUL (CBLT) L -JOY A H-BE K O E TOWN OF \( L MT. CRESTED BUTTE BLM O W N A NICHOLSON LAKE G S H L I A N K BLM G Smith Hill RanEches T ) O N Alpine Meadows C.A. G Glacier Lily U Donation L (CBLT) C Nevada C.E. H Lower Loop (CBLT) Parcels R Rolling River C.E. (CBLT) (CBLT) D Wildbird C.O. Investments Glacier Lily Estates Estates (CBLT) BLM Rice Parcel (CBLT) Peanut Mine C.E. (TCB) MT EMMONS Utley Parcel S LA (CBLT) TE Peanut Lake R Saddle Ridge C.A. Parcel (CBLT) IV ER PEANUT LAKE Gallin Parcel (CBLT) R CRESTED BUTTE D Robinson Parcel Three (CBLT) Trappers Crossing S Valleys L Kapushion Family P Confluence at C.B.
  • Tax Lien Sale Notice 2020

    Tax Lien Sale Notice 2020

    TAX LIEN SALE NOTICE DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, PAYABLE IN 2020 Office of the County Treasurer County of Pueblo State of Colorado INTERNET PUBLIC AUCTION: 2 Day Sale October 19 & 20, 2020 8:00 A.M. county.pueblo.org/treasurer zeusauction.com Tax payment must be received in the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office on or before Thursday, October 15, 2020 by 4:30 p.m., in cash or certified funds to avoid the delinquent property tax lien from being sold. If the property tax is sold at the tax lien sale, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY INTEREST AT THE RATE OF NINE PERCENT (9%) PER ANNUM. Redemption payments will be accepted beginning November 6, 2020. Redemption of these taxes must be paid in cash or certified funds within three (3) years or a Treasurer's Deed may be issued to the holder of the tax lien certificate of purchase. All delinquent taxes must be paid to the Pueblo County Treasurer. Please contact the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office for any information regarding delinquent taxes at (719)583-6689, (719)583-6015, or (719)583-6683. DELINQUENT TAXPAYER NAMES WILL APPEAR IN ALL ISSUES OF DELINQUENT TAX LIST. *PUBLISHED IN THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN, SEPTEMBER 19, 26 & OCTOBER 3, 2020 *PUBLISHED WEEKLY FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. NO DELETIONS TO THIS ADVERTISING LIST CAN BE MADE. Page 2 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 3 Page 4 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE 3812 AUGUSTA
  • USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-1963, Pamphlet

    USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-1963, Pamphlet

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1963 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SKYKOMISH RIVER 30- BY 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R.W. Tabor, V.A. Frizzell, Jr., D.B. Booth, R.B. Waitt, J.T. Whetten, and R.E. Zartman INTRODUCTION From the eastern-most edges of suburban Seattle, the Skykomish River quadrangle stretches east across the low rolling hills and broad river valleys of the Puget Lowland, across the forested foothills of the North Cascades, and across high meadowlands to the bare rock peaks of the Cascade crest. The quadrangle straddles parts of two major river systems, the Skykomish and the Snoqualmie Rivers, which drain westward from the mountains to the lowlands (figs. 1 and 2). In the late 19th Century mineral deposits were discovered in the Monte Cristo, Silver Creek and the Index mining districts within the Skykomish River quadrangle. Soon after came the geologists: Spurr (1901) studied base- and precious- metal deposits in the Monte Cristo district and Weaver (1912a) and Smith (1915, 1916, 1917) in the Index district. General geologic mapping was begun by Oles (1956), Galster (1956), and Yeats (1958a) who mapped many of the essential features recognized today. Areas in which additional studies have been undertaken are shown on figure 3. Our work in the Skykomish River quadrangle, the northwest quadrant of the Wenatchee 1° by 2° quadrangle, began in 1975 and is part of a larger mapping project covering the Wenatchee quadrangle (fig. 1). Tabor, Frizzell, Whetten, and Booth have primary responsibility for bedrock mapping and compilation.
  • Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision

    Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision

    APPENDICES A-D Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision June 2010 Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Appendices for ROD — 1 Record of Decision (ROD) Gunnison National Forest Travel Management DECISION TABLE KEY FOR APPENDICES A-D Decision Code Description F Trail open to and designed for Foot travel l HO Trail designed for Pack and Saddle (P&S) use, allowed use is Foot and P&S U Unmanaged Foot/P&S trail, not a part of the maintained or signed trail system NM/MB Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to mountain bike trail design standards NM/HO Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to pack and saddle design standards MO Trail open to and designed for Single Track motorized travel ATV Trail open to and designed for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches in width JEEP OHV Trail - opened to all motorized vehicles, managed as a trail HC High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3 High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3_NNL High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG4 Passenger vehicle road (Level 4) licensed and non-licensed vehicles allowed PSG5 Passenger vehicle road (Level 5) licensed vehicles only D Route is identified to be closed DE Route is currently decommissioned and will remain closed A Administrative road, motorized travel is allowed by permit A-TRAIL Non motorized trail allowing administrative use by motorized vehicles less than 50 in.
  • Meeting Record

    Meeting Record

    BULL MOOSE SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE/COLORADO BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS/COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED/COLORADO WILDLIFE FEDERATION/NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION/THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP/TROUT UNLIMITED/WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE Sportsmen's Recommendations for Supporting the Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule Problem 1: At 562,000 acres, the upper tier category in the preferred alternative is too small and fails to include much of the most important fish and wildlife habitat. Solution: After further upper tier areas are included by the agency for the Pike-San Isabel and Rio Grande national forests, the acreage of upper tier lands in the preferred alternative should increase to a total of at least 1.4 million acres (33% of Colorado's road less acres) using the prioritized list of road less areas below. Upper tier lands bordering Community Protection Zones may be cut back in acreage so the bordering areas are not included in the upper tier (the overlap is roughly 22,000 acres total). All Alternative 2 lands already placed in upper tier should remain there. Rationale: The upper tier category has been created to balance narrowly defined exceptions in the CO rule such as coal mining, ski area development, and community protection zone logging. This is very similar to the "Primitive" and "Wild Land Recreation" categories used to balance development allowances in the Idaho roadless rule. While important, the preferred alternative (alt. 2) acres are limited to areas where forest plans already prohibit road building. Using these acres as upper tier does not address key fish and wildlife habitat nor does it illustrate a commitment by the Forest Service to go beyond their current plans and create a truly protective rule.
  • IV. Motorized Recreation Route Recommendations

    IV. Motorized Recreation Route Recommendations

    APPENDIX IV COHVCO – TPA –RMEC COMMENTS 6/1/09 IV. Motorized Recreation Route Recommendations The following roads and trails are recommended by COHVCO, in addition to those in the preliminary proposed alternative, and those submitted as a group recommendation in the Colorado 500 letter dated 15 September 2006. These are intended to be a part of an alternative in the DEIS that more fully responds and addresses a historic and enhanced motorized recreation transportation system for all federal lands in the Gunnison Basin. Recommendations 1. Trail 561 Eyrie Basin Trail. An historically used trail by miners and modern day single track motorcyclists. From Italian Creek Road, it drops steeply into Eyrie Creek Basin where it connects to the Taylor Park Road. This trail accesses private land, but has a landowner interested in maintaining public motorized use. 2. Trail 413 Matchless Mountain Trail. An historical use trail that is a single track motorcycle use trail leading from near the top of Matchless Mountain on the west to the west side of Taylor Reservoir where it heads north to a crossing of the Taylor River just above Rivers End Campground. Scenic route from a 12,300 foot peak to the Reservoir’s Edge, and ridden almost exclusively downhill. Access to Trail 413 is off of Trail 424, the Gunnison Spur Trail. It provides challenge for advanced riders in a low use area. 3. Trail 424 Spur Trail Connector. Connects from the Dinner Station Campground to Road 753.1. A historically used motorcycle trail. The route provides a continuity of access to the entire Spur Trail System from the Taylor Park Road.
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2015 to 03/31/2015 San Juan National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2015 to 03/31/2015 San Juan National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2015 to 03/31/2015 San Juan National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Western Area Power - Special use management In Progress: Expected:03/2015 05/2015 Christopher Wehrli Administration Right-of-Way DEIS NOA in Federal Register 435-896-1053 Maintenance and 09/27/2013 [email protected] Reauthorization Project Est. FEIS NOA in Federal EIS Register 01/2015 Description: Update vegetation management activities along 278 miles of transmission lines located on NFS lands in Colorado, Nebraska, and Utah. These activities are intended to protect the transmission lines by managing for stable, low growth vegetation. Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Grand Valley Ranger District, Norwood Ranger District, Yampa Ranger District, Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Pine Ridge Ranger District, Sulphur Ranger District, East Zone/Dillon Ranger District, Paonia Ranger District, Boulder Ranger District, West Zone/Sopris Ranger District, Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Salida Ranger District, Gunnison Ranger District, Mancos/Dolores Ranger District. STATE - Colorado, Nebraska, Utah. COUNTY - Chaffee, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Grand, Gunnison, Jackson, Lake, La Plata, Larimer, Mesa, Montrose, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, Dawes, Daggett, Uintah. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Linear transmission lines located in Colorado, Utah, and Nebraska. R2 - Rocky Mountain Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Tri-State Montrose-Nucla- - Special use management In Progress: Expected:08/2015 04/2016 Liz Mauch Cahone Transmission Comment Period Public Notice 970-242-8211 Improvement Project 05/05/2014 [email protected] EA Est.
  • Rulemaking for Colorado Roadless Areas Map 2

    Rulemaking for Colorado Roadless Areas Map 2

    MAP 2 Inventoried Roadless Areas MAP 2 IRA acres 114 Porphyry Peak 3,400 233 Treasure Mountain 20,900 194 115 Puma 8,500 234 Turkey Creek 22,300 193 Platte River Inventoried Roadless Area rounded 116 Purgatoire 13,200 235 West Needle 2,500 Wilderness Names to nearest 207 117 Rampart West 23,700 236 West Needle Wilderness 5,900 4 100 acres ** Map Key ** 24 118 Romley 6,900 237 Williams Creek White Fir Natural Area 500 209 Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 119 Sangre de Cristo 32,600 White River National Forest 187 204 193 Mount 1 Bard Creek 25,400 120 Scraggy Peaks 8,200 238 Adam Mountain 8,200 195 197 21 Major Roads Zirkel 2 Byers Peak 10,100 121 Sheep Rock 2,200 239 Ashcroft 900 Wilderness 210 205 24 76 208 Rawah 10 25 3 Cache La Poudre Adjacent Areas 3,200 122 Silverheels 6,600 240 Assignation Ridge 13,300 Wilderness 9 11 4 Cherokee Park 7,800 123 Spanish Peaks 5,700 241 Baldy Mountain 6,000 Inventoried Roadless Areas 5 3 5 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas 46,000 124 Spanish Peaks- proposed 1,300 242 Basalt Mountain A 14,000 196 5 3 3 5 5 Cache La Poudre 6 Copper Mountain 13,500 125 Square Top Mountain 5,900 243 Basalt Mountain B 7,400 5 3 3 3 214 Wilderness 7 Crosier Mountain 7,200 126 St. Charles Peak 11,600 244 Berry Creek 8,600 National Forest System Wilderness & Comanche Peak 28 200 24 8 Gold Run 6,500 245 Big Ridge To South Fork A 35,300 191 Wilderness 127 Starvation Creek 8,200 19 5 9 Green Ridge - East 26,700 128 Tanner Peak 17,800 246 Big Ridge To South Fork B 6,000 Other Congressionally Designated Lands 24 Fort 19 5 10 Green Ridge
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations

    Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations

    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
  • Net Leased Investment Opportunity

    Net Leased Investment Opportunity

    NET LEASED INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 1560 Argentine Street Georgetown, CO 80444 Colorado Ski Country JUSTIN BROCKMAN CHRIS STUDENT JULES B. HOCHMAN Principal Associate Advisor Principal 303.962.9553 303.962.9575 303.962.9533 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Company/Tenant Overview Property Overview Site Plan Area Overview Investment Analysis COMPANY/TENANT OVERVIEW Family Dollar is an American variety store chain. With over 8,000 locations in all states except Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, it is the second largest retailer of its type in the United States. For more than 50 years, Family Dollar has provided customers with value and convenience in easy to shop neighborhood locations. As we continue to grow and expand our vendors will play an increasingly important role. In addition to offering quality merchandise at low prices, Family Dollar is committed to the communities we serve by supporting the non-profit organizations that seek to improve the quality of life for our customers and Team Members. 3 PROPERTY OVERVIEW 1560 Argentine Street Georgetown, CO 80444 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Price: $1,458,333 Year Built: 2014 Building Type: Freestanding Gross Leasable Area (GLA): 8,240 SF Lot Size: 27,007 SF Guaranty: Full Corporate • 2014 construction • Corporately guaranteed lease with 7 years remaining • Visible to 37,000 vehicles per day from I-70 • Two illuminated building signs of 24 SF and 124 SF in size visible from I-70 • Monument signage of 30 SF in size • Directly off I-70 exit 228 • Extremely high barrier to entry in historically designated mountain town • Close proximity to world class ski resorts including Arapahoe Basin, Loveland, Keystone, Breckenridge, Copper Mountain, Vail, and Beaver Creek 4 PROPERTY OVERVIEW 5 SITE PLAN 8,240 SF MONUMENT SIGN ARGENTINE STREET 6 AREA OVERVIEW The town is nestled in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains sitting at 8,530 feet above sea level.
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49

    36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49

    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart