Noise Barrier Design Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Noise Barrier Design Handbook . I TE 662 FHWA-RD-76-58 .A3 NOISE BARRIER DESIGN HAMD130 Transportation • no KHWA- RD- 76-58 IGHWAY • Prepared for: • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION « NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. • Technical Report Documentation Poge I. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Cotolog No. FHWA-RD-76-58 4. Title and Subtitle S. Report Dote February 1976 6. Performing Of goni xo lion Code NOISE BARRIER DESIGN HANDBOOK 8. Performing Orgonizotion Report No. 7. Author's) 3199 Myles A. Simpson 9. Performing Organi lotion Nome and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. 1701 North Fort Myer Drive 11. Controct or Grant No. DOT-FH-11-8287 Arlington, Virginia 22209 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Address Department of Transportation Final Report Federal Highway Administration Office of Research • 4. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This handbook is intended to be a tool for use by the highway designer to aid in the design of noise abatement barriers. It provides a means of de- fining the geometric configuration of a barrier to produce a desired noise reduction, and also provides a design evaluation and selection procedure in which specific barriers are detailed, and then evaluated in terms of cost, acoustical characteristics, and non-acoustical characteristics (such as durability, ease of maintenance, safety, aesthetics and community accept- ance). This handbook guides the designer in the preparation of a design which he believes will be accepted by the community and perform as desired both acoustically and non-acoustically, for reasonable cost. Dept. of Transportation MAY 2 1977 Library 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Restrictions. This document is Highway noise, noise barriers, noise No attenuation, highway construction available to the public through the National Technical Information and design Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Clossif. (of this poge) 2). No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 265 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed poge authorized ADDENDUM The barrier design curve presented in this manual has been approved for use on Federal-aid highway projects. Except at large Fresnel numbers, there are no practical differences between this curve and the other approved design curves (the NCHRP 117/144, and the Trans- portation Systems Center Noise Prediction Model) as illustrated in the figure below. The differences among the curves at large Fresnel numbers reflect the application of attenuation limits based on field experiences of the particular curve's author. DO T3 C O 3 C 0) < - DO .1 1 Fresnel Number, N MAX Figure 1. Comparison of approved barrier attenuation curves for incoherent line source. li PREFACE This Handbook is the result of research and development con- ducted for the Federal Highway Administration under Contract No. DOT-FH-11-8287 by Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., with the firm of Wilsey and Ham as subcontractor. Myles A. Simpson has been the Principal Investigator. Within BBN, the following individuals made major contributions. David A. Towers was primarily responsible for obtaining and analyzing information on existing barrier constructions through- out the country, as compiled in Reference 1-1. The field eval- uation study of barrier attenuation reported in Reference 1-2 was conducted by Myles A. Simpson, with assistance from David A. Towers and Harry Siedman. Daniel E. Commins performed the literature review also contained in that reference. The scale model and analytical study of multiple reflections in walled highways and tunnels, described in Reference 1-3, was conducted by Dinesh R. Pejaver and John R. Shadley. Parker W. Hirtle, Neville A. Powers, and Carl J. Rosenberg investigated the sound absorption properties of various materials catalogued in Reference 1-4. Wilsey and Ham had primary responsibility for consideration of cost and non-acoustical characteristics of barriers, and for development of the reference drawings contained in this Handbook. Kenneth L. Wuest and Steven Vartan were principal participants from Wilsey and Ham. in During the course of this project, Dr. Eugene Chen, Dr. Howard Jongedyk and Dr. Timothy Barry have been Contract Managers. The author would like to thank them for their support and guidance throughout the project. Appreciation is also due to personnel from the Offices of Engineering, Environmental Policy and Implementation for their useful comments and sugges- tions. Finally, the author would like to express his sincere gratitude to Grant S. Anderson and B. Andrew Kugler for their assistance, guidance and encouragement throughout the project. • iv • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page. PREFACE iii LIST OF FIGURES vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 CHAPTER 2 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION CONCEPTS 2-1 2-1 Barrier Diffraction and Attenuation 2-1 2-2 Barrier Transmission 2-7 2-3 Barrier Reflections 2-9 2-4 Multiple Shielding Effects 2-13 2-5 Ground Effects 2-13 2-6 Barrier Insertion Loss 2-15 CHAPTER 3 BARRIER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 3-1 3-1 Design Goals 3-3 3-2 Acoustical Considerations 3-9 3-3 Safety Considerations 3-20 3-4 Maintenance Considerations 3-24 3-5 Aesthetics 3-29 3-6 Materials and Designs 3-41 3-6.1 Concrete Barriers 3-46, 3-6.2 Concrete Masonry Unit Walls 3-48 3-6.3 Steel Barriers 3-50 3-6.4 Wood Barriers 3-51 3-6.5 Earth Berms 3-52 3-6.6 Noise Barriers for Elevated Structures ... 3-55 3-6.7 Absorption Treatments for Noise Barriers . 3-55 3-6.8 Other Materials 3-57 3-7 Costs 3-58 3-8 Community Participation in the Barrier Design Process 3-62 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd) Page CHAPTER 4 BARRIER DESIGN PROCEDURE, 4-1 4-1 Step 1: Determine Noise Reduction Design Goals 4-4 4-2 Step 2 Define Site Characteristics 4-10 4-3 Step 3 Determine Geometrical Alternatives 4-18 4-4 Step 4 Identify Additional Barrier Treatments, 4-35 4-5 Step 5 Select Design Options 4-50 4-6 Step 6 Define Cost Factors 4-66 4-7 Step 7 Assess Functional Characteristics , 4-77 4-8 Step 8 Select Barrier , , 4-80 4-9 Step 9 Design Barrier 4-80 CHAPTER 5 BARRIER DESIGN EXAMPLES 5-1 5-1 Basic Example of Barrier Design 5-1 5-2 Parallel Barrier Example 5-11 5-3 Example of Variation in Highway Configuration.. 5-15 APPENDICES A. Reference Drawings for Walls and Berms B. Reference Drawings for Barriers on Elevated Structures C. Reference Drawings for Absorption Treatments D. Design Examples for Existing Noise Barriers REFERENCES VI LIST OF FIGURES Page FIGURE 2-1 Alteration of Noise Paths by a Barrier 2-2 2-2 Barrier Diffraction 2-2 2-3 Illustration of Path Length Difference 2-4 2-4 Barrier Attenuation for a Line of Incoherent Poi nt Sources 2-4 2-5 Short-Circuit of Barrier Around Ends and Through Openings 2-6 2-6 Multiple Sound Reflections for a Double-Walled Highway 2-10 3-1 Barrier Design Process Flow Chart 3-2 3-2 Barrier Noise Reduction Relationships 3-8 3-3 Barrier Attenuation as a Function of Barrier Height 3-11 3-4 Use of Elevated Terrain to Achieve Greater Attenuation with Lower Walls 3-12 3-5 Illustration of Loss of Attenuation with Short Barriers 3-14 3-6 Use of Local Features to Achieve an "Infinite" Barrier 3-15 3-7 Use of Short Segments Wrapped Around the Receiver to Achieve an "Infinite" Barrier 3-15 3-8 Critical Receiver Considerations 3-17 Vll LIST OF FIGURES (cont'd) Page FIGURE 3-9 Use of Safety Barriers 3-21 3-10 Barrier Location for General Conditions on Freeways, Expressways and Highways 3-23 3-11 Barrier Design Safety Considerations 3-25 3-12 Maintenance Considerations Concerning Landscap- ing 3-27 3-13 Providing Access for Barrier Maintenance 3-28 3-14 Spatial Relationship of Barrier to Adjoining Land Use 3-30 3-15 Landscaping can be Visually Pleasing to Both the Community and the Driver 3-31 3-16 Use of Landscaping to Improve Barrier Appearance 3-32 3-17 Relating Barrier Design to Architectural Elements in the Community 3-34 3-18 Relating Barrier Design to Other Highway El ements 3-35 3-19 Visual Considerations in Barrier Design.. 3-36 3-20 Varying the Visual Form 3-38 3-21 Connecting Different Height Walls to Vary Visual Form 3-39 3-22 Use of Berm to Connect Walls and Add Variety 3-40 3-23 Use of Earth Mound to Termi nate Wall 3-42 Vlll LIST OF FIGURES (cont'd) Pa^e FIGURE 3-24 Alternate Means of Terminating Barrier Walls 3-43 3-25 Use of Planter to Terminate Wall (in protected areas only) 3-44 3-26 Alternate Block Wall Patterns 3-49 3-27 Alternate Approaches to Berm Construction 3-53 3-28 Wall and Berm Combined to Create More Height in Limited Right-of-Way 3-54 3-29 Construction Costs for Various Barriers 3-60 3-30 Construction Costs for Barriers with Additional Treatments 3-61 4-1 Receiver/Highway Distance Relationships 4-6 4-2 Design Goal Worksheet 4-7 4-3 Ground Effect Attenuation 4-9 4-4 Safety Factors for On and Off Ramps 4-11 4-5 Example of Safety Considerations for On and Off Ramps 4-12 4-6 Safety Factors for Ramp Intersections 4-13 4-7 Example of Safety Considerations for Ramp Intersections 4-15 4-8 Safety Factors for Intersecting Roads (based on Figure 20-1 [a] , Ref.
Recommended publications
  • Noise Barriers
    INDOT’s Goal for Noise Reduction What is Noise? INDOT’s goal for substantial noise Noise is defined as unwanted sound and can come from man-made and natural 2,000 vehicles per hour sounds twice as loud (+10 dB(A)) reduction is to provide at least a 7 sources. Sound levels are measured in decibels (dB) and typically range from 40 as 200 vehicles per hour. dB(A) reduction for first-row receivers to 100 dB. in the year the barrier is constructed. However, conflicts with adjacent Because human hearing is limited in detecting very high and low frequencies, properties may make it impossible to “A-weighting” is commonly applied to sound levels to better characterize their achieve substantial noise reduction at effects on humans. A-weighted sound levels are expressed as dB(A). all impacted receptors. Therefore, the noise reduction design goal for Indiana is 7 dB(A) for a majority (greater than Common Outdoor Common Indoor Traffic at 65 MPH sounds twice as loud (+10 dB(A)) Noise Levels as traffic at 30 MPH. 50 percent) of the first-row receivers. Noise Levels Noise Levels Decibels, dB(A) 110 Rock Band Highway Traffic Noise Barriers: Jet Flyover at 1150ft (350m) 105 What Causes Traffic Noise? 100 Inside Subway Train (NY) The level of highway traffic noise depends on three factors: • Can reduce the loudness of traffic noise by as much Gas Lawn Mower at 3ft (1m) 95 • Volume of traffic as one-half Diesel Truck at 50ft (15m) 90 Food Blender at 3ft (1m) • Do not completely block all traffic noise 85 • Speed of traffic Noise Barriers 80 Garbage Disposal at 3ft (1m) • Can be effective regardless of the material used • Number of multi-axle vehicles 75 Shouting at 10ft (3m) • Must be tall and long with no openings Gas Lawn Mower at 100ft (30m) As any of these factors increase, noise levels increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Noise Systems for Reducing Outdoor Noise
    ACTIVE NOISE SYSTEMS FOR REDUCING OUTDOOR NOISE Biagini Massimiliano, Borchi Francesco, Carfagni Monica, Fibucchi Leonardo, and Lapini Alessandro Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Firenze, via Santa Marta, 3 - I-50139 , Firenze, Italy email: [email protected] Argenti Fabrizio Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università di Firenze, via Santa Marta, 3 - I-50139 , Firenze, Italy An ANC system prototype designed for stationary noise control linked to traditional noise barriers was initially developed by authors in the past years. The encouraging results initially obtained have shown that ANC systems are feasible and should be further investigated to improve their performances. Nevertheless, FXLMS algorithm, considered in the first prototype architecture, is known to be affected by convergence problems that generally arise when a system fails to properly identify the noise to be cancelled; this process may (and often does) yield an instable system, where the control algorithm tries to catch-up its own sound, increasing the overall sound pressure level on the targets as in “avalanche” effect, potentially leading to damage fragile instrumentation. Hence, instability is unacceptable in practical applications and must be avoided or prevented. With this respect, in this manuscript some more robust alternative ANC algorithms have been investigated and experimentally verified. Keywords: active noise control, stability. 1. Introduction Active noise control (ANC) techniques are nowadays becoming more and more refined and reached a high level of maturity that allowed integration in modern acoustic devices, mainly targeted to hearing aids, headphones and propagation of noise in ducts [1, 2]. Only in recent years applications considering open field scenarios have been developed in practice (open spaces, ambient noise prop- agation [3, 4]), being such situations affected by weather phenomena, randomly moving sources and, circumstantially, time-varying emission spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound, Noise and Vibration an Explanation
    Sound, Noise and Vibration An explanation Rupert Thornely-Taylor P5 (1) HOL/10002/0002 Outline of Presentation • What sound is - sources, and ways in which is it transmitted from source to receiver. • What vibration is - sources, and ways in which is it transmitted from source to receiver. • Human perception of sound and vibration. • Measurement scales and indices. • Assessment approaches - relationship between noise and vibration and human response to them. • Ways in which noise and vibration and their effects can be reduced. • Government policy regarding assessment and decision making. • HS2's application of government policy. P5 (2) HOL/10002/0003 Scope of sound and vibration issues SURFACE OPERATION - RAILWAY SURFACE OPERATION - FIXED PLANT UNDERGROUND OPERATION SURFACE CONSTRUCTION TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION P5 (3) HOL/10002/0004 Basics – what sound is • Sound is air oscillation that is propagated by wave motion at frequencies between 20 cycles/per second (Hertz, abbreviated Hz) and 20,000 cycles/second (20kHz). • Sound decays with distance – it spreads out, is reduced (attenuated) by soft ground surfaces and by intervening obstacles. • Sound is measured in frequency – weighted decibels (dBA) approximating the response of the human ear​. • Noise is unwanted sound, which is difficult to measure due to the complexity of the human ear​. P5 (4) HOL/10002/0005 Basics – what vibration is • Vibration is oscillation of solids that can be propagated through wave motion. • Vibration in soil decays with distance and is also attenuated by energy absorption in the soil and by obstacles and discontinuities. • Vibration is mainly of interest in the frequency range 0.5Hz to 250Hz and can give rise to audible sound which is then measured in decibels.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Assessment Activities
    Noise assessment activities Interesting stories in Europe ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/6 April 2016 Gabriela Sousa Santos, Núria Blanes, Peter de Smet, Cristina Guerreiro, Colin Nugent The European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation (ETC/ACM) is a consortium of European institutes under contract of the European Environment Agency RIVM Aether CHMI CSIC EMISIA INERIS NILU ÖKO-Institut ÖKO-Recherche PBL UAB UBA-V VITO 4Sfera Front page picture: Composite that includes: photo of a street in Berlin redesigned with markings on the asphalt (from SSU, 2014); view of a noise barrier in Alverna (The Netherlands)(from http://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/cutting-noise-with-quiet-asphalt), a page of the website http://rumeur.bruitparif.fr for informing the public about environmental noise in the region of Paris. Author affiliation: Gabriela Sousa Santos, Cristina Guerreiro, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, NILU, NO Núria Blanes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, ES Peter de Smet, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, NL Colin Nugent, European Environment Agency, EEA, DK DISCLAIMER This ETC/ACM Technical Paper has not been subjected to European Environment Agency (EEA) member country review. It does not represent the formal views of the EEA. © ETC/ACM, 2016. ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/6 European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation PO Box 1 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands Phone +31 30 2748562 Fax +31 30 2744433 Email [email protected] Website http://acm.eionet.europa.eu/ 2 ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/6 Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 2 Noise Action Plans .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Communication Barriers, Noise & Physical Barriers
    Overcoming Communication Barriers: Noise and Physical Barriers Noise is one of the most common barriers in communication. It is any persistent or random disturbance which reduces, obscures or confuses the clarity of a message. Physical barriers are closely related to noise as they can obstruct the communication transmission process. Types of noise There are many forms of noise barriers which can occur during the communication process. Some examples are: physical interruptions by people interruption by technology, e.g. ringing telephone, new email, instant message, new Tweets, social media updates external noise e.g. distracting activities going on nearby such as traffic noise outside the building or conversations taking place in or near the room distortions of sound leading to delivery of incomplete messages, e.g. not hearing full words or phrases internal noise – physiological (e.g. blocked up ears), or psychological (e.g. distracting thoughts) the inclusion (in written communication) of irrelevant material or unsystematic approach to the subject matter Noise creates distortions of the message and prevents it from being understood the way it was intended. Comprehension usually deteriorates when there is loud, intrusive noise which interferes with the communication assimilation process. The level of noise is very important. Generally, quiet background noise can easily be filtered out, whereas loud or intrusive noise cannot. Dealing with noise To overcome the noise barrier, the source of the noise must first be established. This may not be easy as the noise may be coming from a conversation in an adjacent room, or from traffic passing by the window. Once the source has been identified, steps can be taken to overcome it.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Selection and Approval of Noise Barrier Products Final Report
    Guidelines for Selection and Approval of Noise Barrier Products Final Report Prepared for: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 25-25, Task 40 Prepared by: ICF International 33 Hayden Avenue Lexington, MA 02421 July 2008 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 40, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. Acknowledgement This study was conducted as part of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 25-25, in cooperation with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the U.S. Department of Transportation. The report was prepared by David Ernst, Leiran Biton, Steven Reichenbacher, and Melissa Zgola of ICF International, and Cary Adkins of Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. The project was managed by Christopher Hedges, NCHRP Senior Program Officer. Disclaimer The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsors. This report has not been reviewed or accepted by the Transportation Research Board's Executive Committee or the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by NCHRP, the Transportation Research Board or the National Research Council. i Abstract State departments of transportation (DOTs) have identified a need for guidance on noise barrier materials products. This study identified and reviewed literature relevant to noise barrier materials and products with respect to characteristics, testing, selection, and approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Barrier Design: Danish and Some European Examples
    May 2010 Reprint Report: UCPRC-RP-2010-04 NNNoooiiissseee BBBaaarrrrrriiieeerrr DDDeeesssiiigggnnn::: DDDaaannniiissshhh aaannnddd SSSooommmeee EEEuuurrrooopppeeeaaannn EEExxxaaammmpppllleeesss Author: Hans Bendtsen, Danish Road Institute—Road Directorate This report is based on research performed by the Danish Road Institute-Road Directorate on behalf of the University of California Pavement Research Center for the California Department of Transportation, and is reprinted here in its original form. Work Conducted as Part of the “Supplementary Studies for Caltrans QPR Program” Contract PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: California Department of Transportation The Danish Road Institute— (Caltrans) Road Directorate and University of California Division of Research and Innovation Pavement Research Center Danish Road Institute DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL PAGE Reprint Report UCPRC-RP-2010-04 Title: Noise Barrier Design: Danish and Some European Examples Author: Hans Bendtsen Prepared for: FHWA No.: Date Work Submitted: Date: Caltrans CA101735D July 2009 May 2010 Contract/Subcontract Nos.: Status: Version No: Caltrans Contract: 65A0293 Final 1 UC DRI-DK: Subcontract 08-001779-01 Abstract: Noise barriers are widely used as an effective means to abate highway traffic noise. With public interest in eco-friendly and aesthetic designs for noise barriers growing, highway agencies are exerting greater efforts to provide the public with “green” noise barriers that are functionally sound as well as adaptive to the surrounding environment. This report presents a summary of green noise barrier design practices experienced by the Danish Road Institute (DRI-DK) and other European countries for the last two decades. Some example noise barrier designs are described with recommendations for more effective and innovative ones. The report contains a recommendation to use varied approaches in green noise barrier designs that are adapted to urban and rural settings.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Noise Requirements
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Noise Requirements for MnDOT and other Type I Federal-aid Projects Satisfies FHWA requirements outlined in 23 CFR 772 Effective Date: July 10, 2017 Website address where additional information can be found or inquiries sent: http://www.dot.state.mn. u /environment/noise/index.html "To request this document in an alternative format, contact Janet Miller at 651-366-4720 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota); 711or1-800-627-3529 (Minnesota Relay). You may also send an e-mail to [email protected]. (Please request at least one week in advance). MnDOT Noise Requirements: Effective Date July 10, 2017 This document contains the Minnesota Department of Transportation Noise Requirements (hereafter referred to as 'REQUIREMENTS') which describes the implementation of the requirements set forth by the Federal Highway Administration Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 772: Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise. These REQUIREMENTS also describe the implementation of the requirements set forth by Minnesota Statute 116.07 Subd.2a: Exemptions from standards, and Minnesota Rule 7030: Noise Pollution Control. These REQUIREMENTS were developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and reviewed and approved with by the Federal Highway Administration. C,- 2.8-{7 Charles A. Zelle, Commissioner Date Minnesota Department of Transportation toJ;.11/11 Arlene Kocher, Divi lronAdmini ~ rator Date I Minnesota Division Federal Highway Administration MnDOT Noise Requirements: Effective
    [Show full text]
  • Local Noise Action Plans
    Practitioner Handbook for Local Noise Action Plans Recommendations from the SILENCE project SILENCE is an Integrated Project co-funded by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme for R&D, Priority 6 Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystems Guidance for readers Step 1: Getting started – responsibilities and competences • These pages give an overview on the steps of action planning and Objective To defi ne a leader with suffi cient capacities and competences to the noise abatement measures and are especially interesting for successfully setting up a local noise action plan. To involve all relevant stakeholders and make them contribute to the implementation of the plan clear competences with the leading department are needed. The END ... DECISION MAKERS and TRANSPORT PLANNERS. Content Requirements of the END and any other national or The current responsibilities for noise abatement within the local regional legislation regarding authorities will be considered and it will be assessed whether these noise abatement should be institutional settings are well fi tted for the complex task of noise considered from the very action planning. It might be advisable to attribute the leadership to beginning! another department or even to create a new organisation. The organisational settings for steering and carrying out the work to be done will be decided. The fi nancial situation will be clarifi ed. A work plan will be set up. If support from external experts is needed, it will be determined in this stage. To keep in mind For many departments, noise action planning will be an additional task. It is necessary to convince them of the benefi ts and the synergies with other policy fi elds and to include persons in the steering and working group that are willing and able to promote the issue within their departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Noise Wall Construction and Evaluation
    Green Noise Wall Construction and Evaluation Ala R. Abbas Robert Y. Liang Andrew Frankhouser John Cardina Karel L. Cubick for the Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Research and Development and the U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration State Job Number 134556 September 2011 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient‟s Catalog No. FHWA/OH-2011/17 4. Title and subtitle 5. Report Date Green Noise Wall Construction and Evaluation September 2011 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert Y. Liang, Andrew Frankhouser, John Cardina, Ala R. Abbas, and Karel L. Cubick 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Akron 134556 402 Buchtel Common 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Akron, OH 44325-2102 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43223 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report details the research performed under Phase I of a research study titled “Green Noise Wall Construction and Evaluation” that looks into the feasibility of using green noise barriers as a noise mitigation option in Ohio. This phase included a thorough review of available green noise barriers to assess their advantages and disadvantages. In addition, it included a questionnaire that was sent out to more than three hundred national and international experts in traffic noise analysis and abatement to document their experience with this type of barriers. Based on the outcome of the literature review and responses to the questionnaire, the Deltalok product was determined to be the most likely product to succeed in Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Analogue Sound Restoration Techniques
    MANUAL OF ANALOGUE SOUND RESTORATION TECHNIQUES by Peter Copeland The British Library Analogue Sound Restoration Techniques MANUAL OF ANALOGUE SOUND RESTORATION TECHNIQUES by Peter Copeland This manual is dedicated to the memory of Patrick Saul who founded the British Institute of Recorded Sound,* and was its director from 1953 to 1978, thereby setting the scene which made this manual possible. Published September 2008 by The British Library 96 Euston Road, London NW1 2DB Copyright 2008, The British Library Board www.bl.uk * renamed the British Library Sound Archive in 1983. ii Analogue Sound Restoration Techniques CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................................2 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 The organisation of this manual ...........................................................................................................3 1.2 The target audience for this manual .....................................................................................................4 1.3 The original sound................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Vinyl's for Sale, from Richard
    Vinyl’s For Sale, from Richard If you are interested in buying any of the below contact me on [email protected] for more info and pictures if you want I try to update monthly as these are on sale else where If you want to check out my feedback and sales on eBay, copy and paste these links cockney1jock Sales http://www.ebay.com/sch/cockney1jock/m.html? _nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=25&_trksid=p3984.m1543.l2654 Feedback http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewFeedback2&userid=cockney1jock&ftab=AllFeedback&sspagename=STRK:MEFSX:FDBK senseisrecords2012 Sales http://www.ebay.com/sch/senseisrecords2012/m.html? _nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=25&_trksid=p3984.m1543.l2654 Feedback http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewFeedback2&userid=senseisrecords2012&ftab=AllFeedback&sspagename=STRK:MEFSX:FDBK 10cc Greatest Hits 1972-1978 10cc Live in London Laserdisc 2 x Glass, Plat and Soft Toy Set Book Of 6 x One Piece Demitasse Cups Book Of 3 Tenors In Concert 1994 Laserdisc 3 Tenors In Concert Mehta Laserdisc 44 Magnum Danger #2 ABBA Voulez-Vous #7 ABBA Greatest Hits - 24 #4 ABBA Arrival #10 ABBA Greatest Hits Vol.2 #7 ABBA Greatest Hits Vol.2 #8 ABBA The Album #8 ABBA All About #7 ABBA Slipping Through My Fingers (Coca Cola) #7 ABBA SOS ABBA On And On And On ABBA On And On And On #2 ABBA The Name of the Game ABBA Summer Night City ABBA Eagle ABBA Voulez-Vous #2 7" ABBA Gimme Gimme Gimme #2 ABBA The Winner Takes it All ABBA The Winner Takes it All #2 ABBA Dancing Queen #3 ABBA - Bjorn & Benny She's My Kind of Girl ABC Beauty Stab #2
    [Show full text]