Barnacle Fouling on the Hull of an Ocean-Going Bulk Carrier Visited the Port of Kawasaki and the Risk Assessment of Their Invasion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Barnacle Fouling on the Hull of an Ocean-Going Bulk Carrier Visited the Port of Kawasaki and the Risk Assessment of Their Invasion Barnacle fouling on the hull of an ocean-going bulk carrier visited the Port of Kawasaki and the risk assessment of their invasion Michio Otani (Marine Ecology Institute Inc.) Toshiyuki Yamaguchi (Chiba University) Hiroshi Kawai (Kobe University) Points Difference of barnacle condition by hull location ・ Species composition ・ Survival rate ・ Incubation rate Risk assessment ・ The difference of invasion risks by species ・ The estimation of the donor port for the candidate of invasive species to the Port of Kawasaki Surveyed ship ・Ore Carrier: 203,180DWT ・Ports of call: Japan (Kawasaki, Mizushima, and Fukuyama) Australia (Mainly Port Headland) ・Date and site: 22nd Sept., 2007 at Mizushima Port Mizushima Fukuyama Kawasaki Her route & ports of call Port Headland Surveyed ship ・Ore Carrier: 203,180DWT ・Port of call: Japan (Kawasaki, Mizushima, and Fukuyama) Australia (Mainly Port Headland) ・Date and site: 22nd Sept., 2007 at Mizushima Port Hull locations surveyed Gudgeon Propeller post Sea chest Fore part Bulbous bow Poop: around propeller of hull and rudder Rope guard (Photographed by T. Hanyuda) Lepadidae: 1species Chthamalidae:1 species Tetraclitidae: 5 species Balanidae: (Balaninae: 8 species Megabalaninae: 6 species) Chthamalus Austrobalanus Tesseropora Tetraclita Lepas anserifera Tetraclitella Yamaguchiella challengeri imperator rosea purpurescens coerulescens squamosa Striatobalanus Amphibalanus Amphibalanus Amphibalanus Balanus trigonus Balanus sp. amaryllis amphitrite improvisus reticulatus Megabalanus Megabalanus Megabalanus Megabalanus Megabalanus Megabalanus validus coccopoma occator rosa volcano ajax Difference of barnacle condition by hull location All barnacles 100% 100% 12.3 80% 80% Other barnacles 49.9 54.5 Megabalanus rosa 60% 60% Death Balanus trigonus 92.2 87.7 Life 40% 40% Amphibalanus reticulatus Composition of Composition 50.1 dominant species 20% 20% 45.5 Chthamalus challengeri 0% 0% Bulbous Feore hull Sea chest Poop Bulbous bow Fore hull Sea chest grating Poop bow grating Hull location Survival rate Sum of incubated barnacles Species composition 100% 0.0 5.6 21.1 80% 50.0 60% III: Eggs with eyes 100.0 II: Eggs without eyes 40% 73.2 I: No eggs 20% 46.7 0% 0.0 Bulbous Hull Sea chest Poop bow grating Hull location Incubation rate Invasion risk assessment Recipient port: The Port of Kawasaki Candidate species: Twelve species which never discovered at the Port of Kawasaki and its adjacent waters were chosen Other conditions 1.As a donor, only some Australian ports trade with the Port of Kawasaki were chosen 2.Postulated that candidate species were carried by not only bulk carriers but also other ocean-going ships from Australia 3.Included also Austrominius modestus as a candidate which was estimated as the most probable species to be introduced in our previous survey Equation for the calculation of IP m m 1 vj ⋅ ESj bj ⋅ ESj IP = ⋅ + (a part of Hayes et ∑ ∑ al. 2005) c j=1 tj j=1 tj Visit score Ballast score β IP: Invasion Potential for each species d v : Ship visit to the recipient port ES = 1− ES: Environmental similarity 90 b : Discharged ballast water at the recipient port d : Absolute difference of the latitude t : Journey duration between donor and recipient port j : Bioregion/or port infected by invasive β: Parameter to adjust the “strength” species of the difference between the c : Constant given by the sum of hull fouling latitude of the donor and recipient and ballast water invasion score across all port bioregions What is the bioregion? Used IUCN bioregion (Kelleher et al. 1995) Results of two scores by bioregion m m 1 vj ⋅ ESj bj ⋅ ESj IP = ⋅∑ + ∑ c j=1 tj j=1 tj Results Visit score Ballast score Mean Volum e of Mean jouney discharged Ballast Ballast Ballast distans duration Difference of BW in ES ES ES Visit score Visit score Visit score Water score Water score Water score IUCN Bioregion (mile) (day) Lat. Ship visit Kawasaki (β=0.2) (β=1) (β=3) (β=0.2) (β=1) (β=3) (β=0.2) (β=1) (β=3) ASR-X 4,329 11.2 1.7 13 770 0.5478929 0.9811111 0.9999933 0.6359472 1.1387897 1.1607065 37.667640 67.451389 68.749537 ASR-XI 3,934 10.0 8.1 2 166 0.3821991 0.910000 0.999271 0.0764398 0.1820000 0.1998542 6.3445059 15.106000 16.587899 ASR-XII 3,904 8.7 13.3 42 0 0.3177841 0.8522222 0.9967728 1.5282748 4.0984733 4.793640 0 0 0 ASR-V 4,902 13.7 1.1 7 0 0.585590 0.9877778 0.9999982 0.3003027 0.5065527 0.5128196 0 0 0 ASR-VII 5,448 14.1 2.5 1 0 0.5116407 0.9722222 0.9999786 0.0362866 0.0689519 0.0709205 0 0 0 ASR-VIII 4,878 13.4 2.6 2 4 0.5077948 0.9711111 0.9999759 0.0757903 0.144942 0.1492501 0.1515805 0.2898839 0.2985003 ASR-IX 4,833 15.3 5.8 3 0 0.4221208 0.9355556 0.9997324 0.0827688 0.183442 0.196026 0 0 0 ASR-IV 4,430 12.0 4.5 10 0 0.450720 0.950000 0.999875 0.3755998 0.7916667 0.8332292 0 0 0 ASR-II 3,650 10.3 15.0 48 0 0.3011729 0.8333333 0.995370 1.4035241 3.8834951 4.6386192 0 0 0 c value Ballast Ballast Ballast Visit score Vis it s core Visit score Water score Water score Water score (β=0.2) (β=1) (β=3) (β=0.2) (β=1) (β=3) All bioregion 4.5149339 10.998314 12.555065 44.163727 82.847273 85.635936 Results of the calculation of the Port of Kawasaki IP 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Striatobalanus amaryllis Austrobmegabalanus ni... IP Tesseropora rosea at Tetraclitella purpurascens Austrobalanus imperator Eliminius modestus Megabalanus coccopoma Megabalanus validus Megabalanus ajax Megabalanus occator β Tetraclita squamosa =0.2 β Yamaguchiella cerlescens =1 β =3 Add another condition Previous IP is resulted only from the difference of the latitude Added another environmental condition of sheltered or exposed Species ES(H) Sheltered・・・・1 Striatobalanus amaryllis 1 Exposed ・・・・2 Austrobmegabalanus nigresce 0.5 Tesseropora rosea 0.5 d Tetraclitella purpurascens 0.5 ES()H = 1− 2 Austrobalanus imperator 0.5 Austrominius modestus 1 Final IP=IP(L)×ES(H)IP Species StriatobalanusIP amaryllis1.0 Eliminius modestus0.8 A 0.6 ustrobmegabalanus nigresc Tesseropora rosea0.4 Tetraclitella purpurascens0.2 0.0 Austrobalanus imperator Striatobalanus amaryllis β Austrominius modestus 0.9789984=0.2 0.9788436 0.9790129 e 0.8001518 0.743604 0.7244835 Austrobmegabalanus ni... 0.4832484 0.4769924 0.4740996 0.4812764 0.4752655 0.4724090IP β 0.4786413 0.4723923 0.4695254=1 Tess0.4750830eropora rose 0.4687309a 0.4658861 Tetraclitella purpurascens β=3 β =0.2 Austrobalanus imperator β =1 β =3 Next issue is the origin of these two species When we discussed the issue, we presumed that origins of these two species might have been different by vector like a hull fouling and a ballast water We used visit and ballast score to presume their origin, because they related to hull fouling and ballast water respectively Origin of candidate species to the Port of Kawasaki (1) (Relative importance of bioregion: Hull fouling) ASR-II ASR-XII 100 100 80 80 60 60 (%) 40 (%) 40 20 20 0 Striatobalanus amaryllis 0 ASR-XI ASR-IV Port Headland (ASR-II) 100 100 80 80 Newcastle (ASR-X) 60 60 (%) 40 (%) 40 Gladstone (ASR-XII) 20 20 0 0 ASR-X ASR-VII 100 ASR-V 100 80 100 80 60 60 80 (%) 40 Austrominius(%) modestus 60 40 ASR-VIII 20 (%) 40 20 Albany (ASR-V)100 ASR-IX 0 20 0 80 100 0 60 80 (%) Newcastle40 (ASR-X)60 20 (%) 40 0 20 0 Striatobalanus amaryllis: Austrominius modestus: Origin of candidate species to the Port of Kawasaki (2) (Relative importance of bioregion: Ballast water) ASR-II ASR-XII 100 100 80 80 60 60 (%) 40 (%) 40 20 20 0 0 ASR-IV ASR-XI 100 100 80 80 60 60 (%) (%) 40 40 20 20 0 0 ASR-VII ASR-X ASR-V 100 100 100 80 80 60 80 (%) (%) 60 40 ASR-VIII (%) 20 40 100 ASR-IX 20 0 60 80 100 0 60 80 (%) 40 60 20 (%) 40 0 20 0 Striatobalanus amaryllis: Austrominius modestus: We have to be careful of next things ・Ships from those two bioregions with ballast water are PCCs (Pure Car Carrier) ・Since PCCs go to various countries, the origin of ballast water may not always be from Australia ・The age of ballast water may be old enough to kill barnacle larvae in it, because PCCs hardly discharge their ballast water The ballast water from those bioregions in Australia does not contribute to the introduction of barnacles Conclusions From hull fouling survey ・Ships’ hulls obviously contribute to the dispersal of barnacles across the sea, with various species attached to each hull location From invasion risk assessment ・High-risk species likely to be introduced to the Port of Kawasaki by hull fouling were Striatobalanus amaryllis and Austrominius modestus ・Candidate ports of former species are Port Headland, Gladstone, and Newcastle and those of latter are Albany and Newcastle ・Ballast water may not contribute to the introduction of these two species Our future plans ・We should be careful about ships’ hulls come from candidate ports to prevent new introduction to the Port of Kawasaki ・We would like to apply our method to other species and other Japanese ports as many as possible to solve the introduction issue in Japan Acknowledgement This work was supported by the Global Environment Research Fund (D-072) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan.
Recommended publications
  • Cumulative Effects of Multiple Stressors: an Invasive Oyster and Nutrient Enrichment Reduce Subsequent Invasive Barnacle Recruitment
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 486 (2017) 322–327 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Cumulative effects of multiple stressors: An invasive oyster and nutrient enrichment reduce subsequent invasive barnacle recruitment Siobhan R. Vye a,b,⁎,1,MarkC.Emmersona,b,c,JaimieT.A.Dicka,b,c, Nessa E. O'Connor a,b,c a School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK b Queen's University Marine Laboratory, 12-13 The Strand, Portaferry, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT22 1PF, UK c Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast BT9 5BN, UK article info abstract Article history: Studies identifying interactions between biological invasions and other stressors have generally focussed on Received 12 February 2016 quantifying their cumulative effects on mature species assemblages. In benthic systems, however, early life his- Received in revised form 21 June 2016 tory processes are key determinants of assemblage structure and functioning. This study tested whether the pres- Accepted 24 October 2016 ence of an invasive species affected early life history processes of two common barnacle species and whether this Available online xxxx was affected by a second common stressor, nutrient enrichment. The results of a field experiment identified and characterised the effects of an invasive oyster, Crassostrea gigas, on the early life history processes of the two bar- Keywords: Multiple stressors nacle species under ambient and enriched nutrient conditions. In the presence C. gigas, the invasive barnacle Crassostrea gigas Austrominius modestus, had a lower recruitment rate, however, there was no effect of the presence of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the New Zealand Rocky Shore Community
    Ecology of the New Zealand Rocky Shore Community A Resource for NCEA Level 2 Biology Darren Smith Ecology of the New Zealand Rocky Shore Community: A Resource for NCEA Level 2 Biology Author: Darren Smith Publisher: New Zealand Marine Studies Centre Address: 185 Hatchery Road, Portobello, Dunedin 9014 ISBN: 978-0-473-23177-4 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-473-23176-7 (Softcover) January 2013 FOREWORD The New Zealand Marine Studies Centre launched a nationwide citizen science project in Seaweek 2013. Anyone can take part in this project which aims to monitor biodiversity and changes in the New Zealand seashore over time. There are two ways of taking part in the project 1. Marine Metre Squared is a simple way for individuals, families, schools and community groups to monitor the shore. 2. Seashore Survey is aimed at secondary school students to tie in with NCEA standards. This resource book is intended to assist teachers of NCEA Level 2 biology to carry out studies of the New Zealand rocky shore. Darren Smith developed this resource when he was on the Endeavour Teacher Fellowship, New Zealand Science, Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellowship Scheme 2012. This scheme was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation and administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. Darren Smith was hosted by the New Zealand Marine Studies Centre, Department of Marine Science, University of Otago. For further resources and information about the Marine Metre Squared project go to mm2.net.nz We welcome your comments and suggestions. Please email [email protected] or phone 03 479 5826.
    [Show full text]
  • Elminius Modestus Global Invasive
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Elminius modestus Elminius modestus System: Marine_terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Arthropoda Maxillopoda Sessilia Balanidae Common name Australian barnacle (English), New Zealand barnacle (English), Firepladet rur (Danish), Nieuw-Zeelandse zeepok (Dutch), Australseepocke (German), Sterretje (Dutch), Australische Seepocke (German), Kruisridderpok (Dutch) Synonym Austrominius modestus Similar species Summary Elminius modestus has spread successfully throughout the Western Europe coastal areas, since its introduction to the southeast coast of the Uk most probably on the hull of ships from New Zealand and /or Australia between 1940 and 1943. There are several factors that aid Elminius success as an invader. Elminius larval stages are eurythermal and euryhaline, enabling them to survive in a wide range of habitat types. E. modestus is a highly fecund species and has a short generation time. It is highly tolerant of changes in tempertaure and salinity. E. modestus compete with native barnacle species for space. It has been observed that the successful range expansion of the barnacle could be facilitated by a changing climate with warmer seas and tempertaures. view this species on IUCN Red List General Impacts Elminius modestus competes for space with the native barnacle Balanus balanoides along the coasts of Western Europe where it has spread widely (Crisp & Chipperfield 1948; Crisp 1958; Nehring, 2005; Barnes & Barnes 1960). Witte et al (2010) report that Austrominius modestus (=Elminius modestus) which was first reported on the Island of Sylt (North Sea) in 1955 and remained rare, has overtaken native barnacles Semibalanus balanoides and Balanus crenatus in abundance when surveyed in the summer of 2007. The authors suggest that this exponential increase in population numbers could be due to mild winters and warm summers over a period.\n Pathway Crisp (1958) noted two types of dispersal natural or 'marginal' dispersal at an average of 20-30 kms per year and long distance or 'remote' dispersal on the hull of a boat or ship.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin's Barnacle
    Isle of Man Non Native Marine Invasive Species Alert Darwin’s Barnacle Scientific Name: Austrominius modestus Habitat: Found at all levels of the shore but is more common mid-shore and may extend to shallow sublittoral. Native to: Australasia Key ID Features: It attaches to a wide variety of substrata including rocks, stones, shells, other crustaceans and artificial structures including ships. It is more tolerant of turbidity and reduced salinity than Semibalanus balanoides and Chthamalus species and is found in estuaries as well as on open coasts where the wave exposure is not high. Elminius modestus is a small barnacle, 5-10 mm in diameter, characterised by having only 4 calcified shell plates. The body shape is low and conical with a large diamond shaped opercular aperture. In young barnacles the shell plates are smooth and the bottom margin of each has an indentation in the centre. The shell plates of older individuals have marked vertical ridges that give the barnacle an irregular, roughly circular margin. The young are opalescent greyish white in colour while the adults become drab greyish brown and eroded. Elminius modestus not only competes with endemic British species, particularly Balanus balanoides, but has colonized some sheltered and estuarine habitats not previously inhabited by them. If you see this species please record the following details: Location of species Date and time of sighting Depth of species Photographs taken ? and report to Tony Glen ([email protected]) or Philippa Tomlinson ([email protected]). .
    [Show full text]
  • Barcodes of Marine Invertebrates from North Iberian Ports: Native Diversity and Resistance to Biological Invasions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Institucional Digital del IEO Marine Pollution Bulletin 112 (2016) 183–188 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Pollution Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul Barcodes of marine invertebrates from north Iberian ports: Native diversity and resistance to biological invasions L. Miralles a, A. Ardura b, A. Arias c, Y.J. Borrell a, L. Clusa a, E. Dopico d, A. Hernandez de Rojas e, B. Lopez c, M. Muñoz-Colmenero a, A. Roca a, A.G. Valiente a, A. Zaiko f, E. Garcia-Vazquez a,⁎ a Department of Functional Biology, University of Oviedo, 33071 Oviedo, Spain b Laboratoire d'Excellence “CORAIL”, Université de Perpignan CBETM, 58 rue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France c Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, University of Oviedo, 33071 Oviedo, Spain d Department of Education Sciences, University of Oviedo, 33071 Oviedo, Spain e Oceanographic Institute of Spain, Avda. Príncipe de Asturias, 70 bis, 33212 Gijon, Spain f Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, 98 Halifax Street East, 7010 Nelson, New Zealand article info abstract Article history: Ports are gateways for many marine organisms transported by ships worldwide, especially non-indigenous spe- Received 14 July 2016 cies (NIS). In this study carried out in North Iberian ports (Cantabrian Sea, Bay of Biscay) we have observed 38% of Received in revised form 6 August 2016 exotic macroinvertebrates. Four species, namely the barnacle Austrominius modestus, the tubeworm Ficopomatus Accepted 8 August 2016 enigmaticus, the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas and the pygmy mussel Xenostrobus securis, exhibited clear signs of Available online 12 August 2016 invasiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Sessile Invertebrates in Marinas on the English Coast
    Aquatic Invasions (2015) Volume 10, Issue 3: 249–264 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2015.10.3.01 Open Access © 2015 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2015 REABIC Research Article Unheralded arrivals: non-native sessile invertebrates in marinas on the English coast John D.D. Bishop*, Christine A. Wood, Anna L.E. Yunnie and Carly A. Griffiths The Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, Devon, UK E-mail: [email protected] (JDDB), [email protected] (CAW), [email protected] (ALEY), [email protected] (CAG) *Corresponding author Received: 10 December 2014 / Accepted: 6 March 2015 / Published online: 23 March 2015 Handling editor: Amy Fowler Abstract Between 2005 and 2012, 61 marinas and harbours around the English coast were surveyed to record the occurrence of non-native species (NNS) of sessile invertebrates. From these surveys, geographic distributions are described for eight species of ascidians, six bryozoans and five other species. A mean of 6.7 sessile invertebrate NNS per site (range 0–13 species) was recorded. At the 43 sites on the English Channel coast, the mean was 7.8 NNS per site, and all of the ten English sites that had ≥ 10 NNS were in the western or central region of the Channel coast. Ten sites on the Channel coast surveyed in 2004 were re-visited at least once in 2009 or 2010, and the mean number of sessile invertebrate NNS had increased from 6.0 to 7.6 species per site. Combining data from all visits in 2005–2012 for the sites surveyed in 2004, the mean number of NNS recorded per site rose to 9.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Climatic Warming Explain Why an Introduced Barnacle Finally Takes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Electronic Publication Information Center Biol Invasions (2010) 12:3579–3589 DOI 10.1007/s10530-010-9752-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Does climatic warming explain why an introduced barnacle finally takes over after a lag of more than 50 years? Sophia Witte • Christian Buschbaum • Justus E. E. van Beusekom • Karsten Reise Received: 3 June 2009 / Accepted: 29 March 2010 / Published online: 21 April 2010 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Invading alien species may have to await and several warm summers in a row has led to an appropriate conditions before developing from a rare exponential population growth in A. modestus. addition to the recipient community to a dominance over native species. Such a retarded invasion seems Keywords Alien species Á Austrominius modestus Á to have happened with the antipodean cirripede Invasion Á Climate change Á North Sea crustacean Austrominius modestus Darwin, formerly known as Elminius modestus, at its northern range in Europe due to climatic change. This barnacle was introduced to southern Britain almost seven decades ago, and from there spread north and south. At the Introduction island of Sylt in the North Sea, the first A. modestus were observed already in 1955 but this alien Translocation of species across natural barriers by remained rare until recently, when in summer of human carriers has become a process of increasing 2007 it had overtaken the native barnacles Semibal- global importance in aquatic coastal ecosystems anus balanoides and Balanus crenatus in abundance. (Carlton 1985; Grosholz 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement and Recruitment Potential of Four Invasive and One Indigenous Barnacles in South Korea and Their Future
    sustainability Article Settlement and Recruitment Potential of Four Invasive and One Indigenous Barnacles in South Korea and Their Future Michael Dadole Ubagan 1,2,†, Yun-Sik Lee 1,3,† , Taekjun Lee 1 , Jinsol Hong 4 , Il Hoi Kim 1 and Sook Shin 1,3,*,† 1 Marine Biological Resources Institute, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea; [email protected] (M.D.U.); [email protected] (Y.-S.L.); [email protected] (T.L.); [email protected] (I.H.K.) 2 Department of Animal Biotechnology and Resource, College of Science and Technology, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea 3 O-Jeong Resilience Institute, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea 4 Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +85-02-3399-1717; Fax: +85-02-3399-1762 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Invasion by nonindigenous species is a major threat to marine ecosystems. In this study, the distribution and occupied area (as a percentage) of four invasive barnacles (Amphibalanus am- phitrite, Amphibalanus eburneus, Amphibalanus improvisus, Perforatus perforatus), and one indigenous (Balanus trigonus) barnacle in 13 ports in three Korean seas (East sea, Korea Strait, and Yellow Sea) were investigated. The average ratio for all five species was 11.17% in summer and 7.59% in winter, indicating a higher occupancy in summer. B. trigonus, which is an indigenous species, was found on all ports, except for one (IC). Of the invasive species, A. amphitrite was found mainly in the Yellow Sea, A. improvisus in the Korea Strait, and A.
    [Show full text]
  • M656p193.Pdf
    Vol. 656: 193–205, 2020 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 10§ https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13365 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Contribution to the Theme Section ‘The ecology of temperate reefs in a changing world’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Little evidence that lowering the pH of concrete supports greater biodiversity on tropical and temperate seawalls Amanda R. Hsiung1,#, Wen Ting Tan1,#, Lynette H. L. Loke1,4,*, Louise B. Firth2, Eliza C. Heery1,5, James Ducker2, Victoria Clark2, Y. Shona Pek3, William R. Birch3, Ambert C. F. Ang1, Rania S. Hartanto1, Tiffany M. F. Chai2, Peter A. Todd1 1Experimental Marine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Block S3, Singapore 117557 2School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK 3Institute of Materials Research & Engineering, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634 4Present address: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales 2109, Australia 5Present address: Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, 620 University Rd, Friday Harbor, Washington 98250, USA ABSTRACT: Concrete is one of the most commonly used materials in the construction of coastal and marine infrastructure despite the well known environmental impacts which include a high carbon footprint and high alkalinity (~pH 13). There is an ongoing discussion regarding the poten- tial positive effects of lowered concrete pH on benthic biodiversity, but this has not been investi- gated rigorously. Here, we designed a manipulative field experiment to test whether carbonated (lowered pH) concrete substrates support greater species richness and abundance, and/or alter community composition, in both temperate and tropical intertidal habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Assessment of Marine Non-Native Species in the Shetland Islands, Scotland
    BioInvasions Records (2015) Volume 4, Issue 3: 147–155 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2015.4.3.01 © 2015 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2015 REABIC Research Article Rapid assessment of marine non-native species in the Shetland Islands, Scotland Samuel B. Collin1, Jacqueline F. Tweddle2,3 and Rachel J. Shucksmith1* 1NAFC Marine Centre, Port Arthur, Scalloway, Shetland Islands, ZE1 0UN, UK 2University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK 3Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, 375 Victoria Rd, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK E-mail: [email protected] (SBC), [email protected] (JFT), [email protected] (RJS) *Corresponding author Received: 26 February 2015 / Accepted: 29 April 2015 / Published online: 2 June 2015 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract The Shetland Islands, northern Scotland, have a highly active and diverse maritime environment, and local marine industries form an important part of the local economy. The potential for damage caused by non-native species is high. As part of an assessment of the current status of non-native species in Shetland, a series of rapid assessment surveys, coupled with a settlement panel monitoring programme, were carried out at 18 sites between May 2012 and October 2014. Eight non-native species were detected in our surveys, three of which (Corella eumyota Traustedt, 1882; Bugulina simplex Hincks, 1886; and Dasysiphonia japonica (Yendo) Kim, 2012) had not been previously recorded. Observations by SCUBA also reported the first UK record of Schizoporella japonica Ortmann, 1890 growing on natural substrate. A literature review revealed three additional non-native species that have been documented in Shetland but were not detected in our survey work.
    [Show full text]
  • England Biodiversity Indicators 2020
    20. Pressure from invasive species England Biodiversity Indicators 2020 This document supports 20. Pressure from invasive species Technical background document Colin A. Harrower, Stephanie L. Rorke, Helen E. Roy For further information on the England Biodiversity Indicators visit: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/england-biodiversity-indicators 1 20. Pressure from invasive species 20. Pressure from invasive species – technical document – September 2020 Colin A. Harrower, Stephanie L. Rorke, Helen E. Roy Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Overview There are currently 193 invasive non-native species in Great Britain that are included within the indicator for 2020. The current indicator is the result of incremental updating of an indicator initially produced in 2014. In 2014, the first indicator was created using a 2-stage process beginning with extent estimation using a statistical process fitted to occurrence data available through the NBN Gateway which were then validated and modified, where required, by taxonomic experts. The rationale for using a statistical process to produce extent estimates was to attempt to control for the patchy nature of the occurrence data. The expert validation in 2014 determined that the extent estimates produced algorithmically typically underestimated the true extent due to much of the occurrence data not being easily available, particularly for earlier decades, and therefore most of the estimates required revision by the taxonomic experts. In 2015, the species list and the classification of extent (derived for the 2014 indicator) were reviewed and updated by taxonomic experts. The existing species list and the classification of extents were reviewed again in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 to update the indicator.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanography and Marine Biology an Annual Review Volume 58
    Oceanography and Marine Biology An Annual Review Volume 58 Edited by S. J. Hawkins, A. L. Allcock, A. E. Bates, A. J. Evans, L. B. Firth, C. D. McQuaid, B. D. Russell, I. P. Smith, S. E. Swearer, P. A. Todd First edition published 2021 ISBN: 978-0-367-36794-7 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-35149-5 (ebk) Chapter 1 The Biology of Austrominius Modestus (Darwin) in its Native and Invasive Range Ruth M. O’Riordan, Sarah C. Culloty, Rob Mcallen & Mary Catherine Gallagher (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) This OA chapter is funded by University College Cork Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 2020, 58, 1–78 © S. J. Hawkins, A. L. Allcock, A. E. Bates, A. J. Evans, L. B. Firth, C. D. McQuaid, B. D. Russell, I. P. Smith, S. E. Swearer, P. A. Todd, Editors Taylor & Francis THE BIOLOGY OF AUSTROMINIUS MODESTUS (DARWIN) IN ITS NATIVE AND INVASIVE RANGE RUTH M. O’RIORDAN, SARAH C. CULLOTY, ROB MCALLEN & MARY CATHERINE GALLAGHER School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences and the Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland Abstract Austrominius modestus, formerly Elminius modestus, is a relatively small species of four-plated acorn barnacle, which is native to the subtropical and temperate zones of Australasia. It was introduced into Europe in the 1940s, where its current range includes England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland and continental Europe from Denmark to southern Portugal, as well as two reported locations in the Mediterranean Sea. This species occurs intertidally and subtidally on a very wide range of substrata in both its native and introduced range and is found on sheltered to intermediate exposed shores, but is absent from wave-exposed shores, probably due to the relative fragility of its shell.
    [Show full text]