DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography 

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bibliography Aalders, G. J. D. “Die Meropes des Theopomp.” Historia 27 (1978): 317–27. Adkins, Arthur W. H. Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values. Oxford: Clarendon, 1960. ———. “Problems in Greek Popular Morality.” CP 73 (1978): 143–58. Africa, Thomas W. “Ephorus and Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 1610.” AJP 83 (1962): 86–89. Alonso-N´u˜nez, J. M. “The Emergence of Universal Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B.C.” In Purposes of History: Studies in Greek History from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B.C., Studia Hellenistica 30, edited by Herman Verdin, Guido Schepens, and Els de Keyser, 173–92. Louvain: n.p., 1990. Anderson, J. K. Xenophon. London: Gerald Duckworth, 1974. Andrewes, A. “Ephoros Book I and the Kings of Argos.” CQ n.s., 1 (1951): 39–45. ———. “The Arginousai Trial.” Phoenix 28 (1974): 112–22. Badian, E. “The Peace of Callias.” JHS 107 (1987): 1–39. Reprinted in From Plataea to Potidaea: Studies in the History and Historiography of the Pentecon- taetia, 1–72. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993. ———. “The King’s Peace.” In Georgica: Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell, BICS Supplement 58, ed. Michael A. Flower and Mark Toher, 25– 48. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 1991. Barber, G. L. The Historian Ephorus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935. Reprinted with text and translation edited by M. C. J. Miller. Chicago: Ares, 1993. 183 184 bibliography Baynes, Norman H. “Isocrates.” In Byzantine Studies and Other Essays, 144–67. London: Athlone, 1960. Bengtson, Hermann. Die Staatsvertr¨age des Altertums. 3 vols. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1962–69. Benson, Hugh H. “The Dissolution of the Problem of the Elenchus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13 (1995): 45–112. Bett, Richard. “The Sophists and Relativism.” Phronesis 34 (1989): 139–69. Bigwood, J. M. “Ctesias’ Account of the Revolt of Inarus.” Phoenix 30 (1976): 1– 25. ———. “Ctesias’ Indica and Photius.” Phoenix 43 (1989): 302–16. Bischoff, Heinrich. Der Warner bei Herodot. Diss., Marburg, 1932. Bloedow, Edmund F. “Aspasia and the ‘Mystery’ of the Menexenos.” WS n.s., 9 (1975): 32–48. Bluck, R. S. “The Origin of the Greater Alcibiades.” CQ 47 (1953): 46–52. Bos, Cornelius Anton. Interpretatie vaderschapen datering van de Alcibiades Maior. Culemborg: Tjeenk Willink-Noorduijn, 1970. Breitenbach, H. F. Die historiographische Anschauungsformen Xenophons. Freiburg: Paulusdruckerei, 1950. ———. “Xenophon.” RE 9A(1967), 1569–2052. Bruce, I. A. F. “Theopompus and Classical Greek Historiography.” History and Theory 9 (1970): 86–109. ———. “Theopompus, Lysander and the Spartan Empire.” AHB 1 (1987): 1–5. Bruns, Ivo. Das literarische Portr¨at der Griechen im f¨unften und vierten Jahrhundert vor Christi Geburt. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz, 1896. Brunt, P. A. “On Historical Fragments and Epitomes.” CQ n.s., 30 (1980): 477–94. ———. “Postscript. Thucydides’ Funeral Speech.” In Studies in Greek History and Thought, 159–80. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993. Buchner, Edmund. Der Panegyrikos des Isokrates. Historia Einzelschriften 2. Wiesba- den: Franz Steiner, 1958. Buck, Robert J. Thrasybulus and the Athenian Democracy: The Life of an Athenian Statesman. Historia Einzelschriften 120. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1998. Buckler, John. “Plutarch on the Trials of Pelopidas and Epaminondas (369 B.C.).” CP 73 (1981): 36–42. ———. “Xenophon’s Speeches and the Theban Hegemony.” Athenaeum 60 (1982): 180–204. Bury, J. B. The Ancient Greek Historians. London: Macmillan, 1908. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications, 1958. Cahn, Michael. “Reading Rhetoric Rhetorically: Isocrates and the Marketing of Insight.” Rhetorica 7 (1989): 121–44. Carawan, Edwin M. “The Five Talents Cleon Coughed Up (Schol. Ar. Ach. 6).” CQ n.s., 40 (1990): 137–47. Cargill, Jack. The Second Athenian League: Empire or Free Alliance? Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1981. Carter, L. B. The Quiet Athenian. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. Cawkwell, G. L. “Epaminondas and Thebes.” CQ n.s., 22 (1972): 254–78. Bibliography 185 ———. “The Peace between Athens and Persia.” Phoenix 51 (1997): 115–30. ———. Introduction and notes to Xenophon: A History of My Times (Hellenica). Translated by Rex Warner. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1979. Chambers, James T. “The Fourth-Century Athenians’ View of Their Fifth-Century Empire.” PP 30 (1975): 177–91. Christ, M. R. “Theopompus and Herodotus: A Reassessment.” CQ n.s., 43 (1993): 47–52. Classen, Carl Joachim. “The Study of Language amongst Socrates’ Contemporar- ies.” PACA 2 (1959): 33–49. Reprinted in Sophistik, edited by Carl Joachim Classen, 215–47. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976. Clavaud, Robert. Le M´enex`ene de Platon et la rh´etorique de son temps. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1980. Cloch´e, Paul. Isocrate et son temps. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1963. Cole, Thomas. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Press of Western Reserve University, 1967. Reprint, Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990. ———. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991. ———. “Who Was Corax?” ICS 16 (1991): 65–84. Collingwood, R. G. The Idea of History. Oxford: Clarendon, 1946. Conley, Thomas M. “Dating the So-Called Dissoi Logoi: A Cautionary Note.” Ancient Philosophy 5 (1985): 59–65. Connor, W. Robert. “Theopompus’ Treatment of Cimon.” GRBS 4 (1963): 107–14. ———. “History without Heroes.” GRBS 8 (1967): 133–54. ———. Theopompus and Fifth-Century Athens. Washington, D.C.: Center for Hel- lenic Studies, 1968. ———. The New Politicians of Fifth-Century Athens. Princeton: Princeton Univer- sity Press, 1971. Reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992. ———. Thucydides. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. Cook, Brad L. “Theopompus Not Theophrastus: Correcting an Attribution in Plutarch Demosthenes 14.4.” AJP 121 (2000): 537–47. Coventry, Lucinda. “Philosophy and Rhetoric in the Menexenus.” JHS 109 (1989): 1–15. Crane, Gregory. The Blinded Eye: Thucydides and the New Written Word. Lanham, Md.: Rowan & Littlefield, 1996. Crosby, H. Lamar. “Athenian History and the Athenian Public.” In Classical Stud- ies Presented to Edward Capps, 72–85. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1936. Dalfen, Joachim. “Xenophon als analytiker und kritiker politischer Rede (Zu Hell. VI. 3, 4–7 und VI 5,33–48).” GrazBeitr 5 (1976): 59–84. Davidson, James [N.]. “Isocrates against Imperialism: An Analysis of the De Pace.” Historia 39 (1990): 20–36. ———. Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997. 186 bibliography Davies, J. K. Athenian Propertied Families. Oxford: Clarendon, 1971. Dean-Jones, Lesley. “Menexenus—Son of Socrates.” CQ n.s., 45 (1995): 51–57. Delebecque, Edouard.´ Essai sur la vie de Xenophon. Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1957. Derenne, Eudore. Les proc`es d’impi´et´e intent´es aux philosophesa ` Ath`enes au Vme et au IVme si`ecles avant J.-C. Li`ege: H. Vaillant-Carmanne, 1930. Reprint, New York: Arno Press, 1976. Develin, Robert. “Pompeius Trogus and Philippic History.” SStor 8 (1985): 110– 15. Dewald, Carolyn. “Practical Knowledge and the Historian’s Role in Herodotus and Thucydides.” In The Greek Historians: Literature and History, Papers pre- sented to A. E. Raubitschek, 47–63. Saratoga, Calif.: ANMA Libri, 1985. Diels, Hermann, and Walther Kranz. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1951–52. Dietzfelbinger, Rudolf. “Religi¨ose Kategorien in Xenophons Geschichtsverst¨and- nis.” WJA 18 (1992): 133–45. Dihle, Albrecht. Der Kanon der zwei Tugenden. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1968. ———. “Das Satyrspiel «Sisyphos.»” Hermes 105 (1977): 28–42. Dillery, John. Xenophon and the History of His Times. London: Routledge, 1995. Dittmar, Heinrich. Aeschines von Sphettos: Studien zur Literaturgeschichte der Sokra- tiker. Berlin: Weidmann, 1912. Dodds, E. R. The Greeks and the Irrational. Sather Classical Lectures 25. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1951. ———, ed. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon, 1959. Dover, K[enneth] J. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. ———. “The Freedom of the Intellectual in Greek Society.” Talanta 7 (1976): 24– 54. Reprinted in The Greeks and Their Legacy: Collected Papers, 135–58. Vol. 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. ———. “Anecdotes, Gossip and Scandal.” In The Greeks and Their Legacy: Collected Papers, 45–52. Vol. 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. ———. The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997. ———, ed. Plato: Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. Drews, Robert. “Ephorus and History Written καταγ εν ς .” AJP 84 (1963): 244–55. ———. “Ephorus’ καταγ εν ς History Revisited.” Hermes 104 (1976): 497–98. Due, Bodil. “The Trial of the Generals in Xenophon’s Hellenica,” ClMed 34 (1983): 33–44. ———. The Cyropaedia: Xenophon’s Aims and Methods. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1989. Duˇsani´c, Slobodan. “On Theopompus’ Philippica VI–VIII.” Aevum 51 (1977): 27–36. ———. “Isocrates, the Chian Intellectuals, and the Political Context of the Euthy- demus.” JHS 119 (1999): 1–16. Eckstein, Arthur M. Moral Vision in The Histories of Polybius. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995. Bibliography 187 Edwards, Michael. Greek Orators IV: Andocides. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995. Euben, J. Peter. Corrupting Youth: Political Education, Democratic Culture, and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. Eucken, Christoph. Isokrates:
Recommended publications
  • Xenophon and Epaminondas Westlake, H D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; Proquest Pg

    Xenophon and Epaminondas Westlake, H D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; Proquest Pg

    Xenophon and Epaminondas Westlake, H D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; ProQuest pg. 23 Xenophon and Epaminondas H. D. Westlake HE PRESENTATION ofEpaminondas by Xenophon is very remark­ Table, even in a work so unmethodically and capriciously written as the Hellenica. Epaminondas is mentioned for the first time as leader of a Theban expedition to Achaea in 366 B.c. (7.1.41)1 when his achievements already included his celebrated defiance of Agesilaus at the Peace Congress of 371, his defeat of the Spartans at Leuctra, and his first two invasions of the Peloponnese, which resulted in the devastation of Laconia, the liberation of Mes­ senia and the foundation of Messene and Megalopolis. 2 The suppres­ sion of his name up to that point has rightly been attributed to the notorious antipathy of Xenophon towards the The bans, which causes him to deny to their principal leader the credit due for all these achievements.3 It is, therefore, astonishing to find that when Xenophon deals with the fourth The ban invasion of the Peloponnese culminating in the battle of Mantinea (7.5.4-27), Epaminondas dominates the narrative: the course of events is recorded almost exclusively from his point of view; his plans and motives are carefully analysed; he is credited with having shown foresight and boldness throughout the campaign; some of his actions are explicitly praised. It is tempting to interpret the presentation of Epaminondas in the last pages of the Hellenica as a palinode; to conclude that Xenophon, conscious of having done him less than justice hitherto, now wishes to 1 All references are to the Hellenica unless otherwise stated.
  • SCEPTICAL ARGUMENTATION and PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY: By

    SCEPTICAL ARGUMENTATION and PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY: By

    SCEPTICAL ARGUMENTATION AND PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY: TOPICS IN HELLENISTIC PHILOSOPHY by Máté Veres Submitted to Central European University Department of Philosophy In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Gábor Betegh CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2016 Table of contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 7 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1. Keep calm and carry on: Sextan Pyrrhonism as a kind of philosophy ....... 17 1. Philosophy and inquiry ............................................................................................ 18 2. The road to Pyrrhonism ........................................................................................... 22 2.1. The 'origins' of scepticism (PH I. 12) ............................................................... 22 2.2. The goal of Pyrrhonism (PH I. 26 and 29)........................................................ 26 2.3. Men of talent ..................................................................................................... 34 3. The origin of Pyrrhonism ......................................................................................... 37 3.1. The Partisan Premise
  • Herodotus and the Origins of Political Philosophy the Beginnings of Western Thought from the Viewpoint of Its Impending End

    Herodotus and the Origins of Political Philosophy the Beginnings of Western Thought from the Viewpoint of Its Impending End

    Herodotus and the Origins of Political Philosophy The Beginnings of Western Thought from the Viewpoint of its Impending End A doctoral thesis by O. H. Linderborg Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Engelska Parken, 7-0042, Thunbergsvägen 3H, Uppsala, Monday, 3 September 2018 at 14:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Docent Elton Barker (Open University). Abstract Linderborg, O. H. 2018. Herodotus and the Origins of Political Philosophy. The Beginnings of Western Thought from the Viewpoint of its Impending End. 224 pp. Uppsala: Department of Linguistics and Philology, Uppsala University. ISBN 978-91-506-2703-9. This investigation proposes a historical theory of the origins of political philosophy. It is assumed that political philosophy was made possible by a new form of political thinking commencing with the inauguration of the first direct democracies in Ancient Greece. The pristine turn from elite rule to rule of the people – or to δημοκρατία, a term coined after the event – brought with it the first ever political theory, wherein fundamentally different societal orders, or different principles of societal rule, could be argumentatively compared. The inauguration of this alternative-envisioning “secular” political theory is equaled with the beginnings of classical political theory and explained as the outcome of the conjoining of a new form of constitutionalized political thought (cratistic thinking) and a new emphasis brought to the inner consistency of normative reasoning (‘internal critique’). The original form of political philosophy, Classical Political Philosophy, originated when a political thought launched, wherein non-divinely sanctioned visions of transcendence of the prevailing rule, as well as of the full range of alternatives disclosed by Classical Political Theory, first began to be envisioned.
  • Conflict in the Peloponnese

    Conflict in the Peloponnese

    CONFLICT IN THE PELOPONNESE Social, Military and Intellectual Proceedings of the 2nd CSPS PG and Early Career Conference, University of Nottingham 22-24 March 2013 edited by Vasiliki BROUMA Kendell HEYDON CSPS Online Publications 4 2018 Published by the Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies (CSPS), School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. © Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies and individual authors ISBN 978-0-9576620-2-5 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the authors and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/csps TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. i THE FAMILY AS THE INTERNAL ENEMY OF THE SPARTAN STATE ........................................ 1-23 Maciej Daszuta COMMEMORATING THE WAR DEAD IN ANCIENT SPARTA THE GYMNOPAIDIAI AND THE BATTLE OF HYSIAI .............................................................. 24-39 Elena Franchi PHILOTIMIA AND PHILONIKIA AT SPARTA ......................................................................... 40-69 Michele Lucchesi SLAVERY AS A POLITICAL PROBLEM DURING THE PELOPONESSIAN WARS ..................... 70-85 Bernat Montoya Rubio TYRTAEUS: THE SPARTAN POET FROM ATHENS SHIFTING IDENTITIES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN LYCURGUS’ AGAINST LEOCRATES ................................................................................ 86-102 Eveline van Hilten-Rutten THE INFLUENCE OF THE KARNEIA ON WARFARE ..........................................................
  • Argos in Greek Inter-Poleis Relations in the 4Th Century BC

    Argos in Greek Inter-Poleis Relations in the 4Th Century BC

    Journal of Sustainable Development; Vol. 8, No. 7; 2015 ISSN 1913-9063 E-ISSN 1913-9071 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Argos in Greek Inter-Poleis Relations in the 4th Century BC Elena A. Venidiktova1 1 Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia Correspondence: Elena A. Venidiktova, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 420008, Kazan, Kremlyovskaya Street, 18, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: June 15, 2015 Accepted: June 24, 2015 Online Published: June 30, 2015 doi:10.5539/jsd.v8n7p222 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n7p222 Abstract The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that the 4th century BC for the Greek poleis was the time of regular inter-poleis conflicts in which a special role was played by Argos. Argos is poorly studied in modern historiography; its place in the historically developed system of Greek poleis has not been properly investigated and evaluated. The paper is aimed at examining the course of foreign policy of the polis of Argos in the 4th century BC and indicating its role in the inter-poleis conflicts. The key methodology of the research is made up by a set of methods based on the study of various data on the topic. The paper indicates the position of Argos in inter-poleis conflicts, reveals the facts of its aggressive foreign policy that was oriented to rival Sparta, presents the stages of activity of the Argives in establishing the state. The paper findings may be useful in academic studies while compiling general works on the military history of ancient Greece, or while running special courses devoted to the history of the political development of ancient Greece.
  • Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective

    Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: a Socio-Cultural Perspective

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective Nicholas D. Cross The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1479 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INTERSTATE ALLIANCES IN THE FOURTH-CENTURY BCE GREEK WORLD: A SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE by Nicholas D. Cross A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 Nicholas D. Cross All Rights Reserved ii Interstate Alliances in the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________ __________________________________________ Date Jennifer Roberts Chair of Examining Committee ______________ __________________________________________ Date Helena Rosenblatt Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Joel Allen Liv Yarrow THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Interstate Alliances of the Fourth-Century BCE Greek World: A Socio-Cultural Perspective by Nicholas D. Cross Adviser: Professor Jennifer Roberts This dissertation offers a reassessment of interstate alliances (συµµαχία) in the fourth-century BCE Greek world from a socio-cultural perspective.
  • Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities (2010)

    Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities (2010)

    Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities AMERICAN PHILOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION american classical studies volume 54 Series Editor Kathryn J. Gutzwiller Studies in Classical History and Society Meyer Reinhold Sextus Empiricus The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism Luciano Floridi The Augustan Succession An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 55 56 (9 B.C. A.D. 14) Peter Michael Swan Greek Mythography in the Roman World Alan Cameron Virgil Recomposed The Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity Scott McGill Representing Agrippina Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire Judith Ginsburg Figuring Genre in Roman Satire Catherine Keane Homer’s Cosmic Fabrication Choice and Design in the Iliad Bruce Heiden Hyperides Funeral Oration Judson Herrman Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities The Sacred Laws of Selinus and Cyrene Noel Robertson Religion and Reconciliation in Greek Cities The Sacred Laws of Selinus and Cyrene NOEL ROBERTSON 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright q 2010 by the American Philological Association Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
  • Band 34, 2019 TYCHE Beiträge Zur Alten Geschichte Papyrologie Und Epigraphik TYCHE

    Band 34, 2019 TYCHE Beiträge Zur Alten Geschichte Papyrologie Und Epigraphik TYCHE

    Herausgegeben von: Thomas Corsten Fritz Mitthof Bernhard Palme Hans Taeuber Band 34, 2019 TYCHE Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte Papyrologie und Epigraphik TYCHE ISBN 978-3-903207-49-3 Band 34, 2019 Tyche_34_2019_Umschlag_00mm_Ruecken.indd Alle Seiten 02.03.20 09:48 I NHALTSVERZEICHNIS Lincoln H. B l u m e l l — Kerry H u l l: An Inscribed Statue of Tyche in Kyoto, Japan (Taf. 1) ................................................................................ 1 Ines Bogensperger — Lucian Reinfandt: Textile Termini und Dinar-Zahlen auf einem arabischen Papyrus des 9. Jahrhunderts (Taf. 2) .. 5 Anna Dolganov: Reichsrecht and Volksrecht in Theory and Practice: Roman Justice in the Province of Egypt (P.Oxy. II 237, P.Oxy. IV 706, SB XII 10929) .......................................................................................... 27 Patrice F a u r e: Accepta pariatoria et primipilat. Nouvelles hypothèses sur un monument inscrit de Nouae (Taf. 3–4) 61 Angela K a l i n o w s k i: A Re-discovered Inscription from Ephesos: a Funerary Monument for Vedia Kalliste .................................................... 81 Peter K r u s c h w i t z — Victoria G o n z á l e z B e r d ú s: Nicht auf den Kopf gefallen: Zur Wiener Versinschrift AE 1992, 1452 = AE 2015, 1102 (Taf. 5) ............................................................................................. 89 Kallia L e m p i d a k i: Constructing Commemoration in Imperial Aphrodisias: the Case of Apollonios ............................................................................ 95 Federico M o r e l l i: She (ϣⲉ): il nome copto del dodekanoummion .......... 115 Amphilochios P a p a t h o m a s: SB XIV 11961: Fragment eines spät- antiken Geschäftsbriefes (Taf. 6) .............................................................
  • Mercenaries in the Army of Hellenistic Athens

    Mercenaries in the Army of Hellenistic Athens

    Journal of History Culture and Art Research (ISSN: 2147-0626) SPECIAL ISSUE Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol. 6, No. 5, November 2017 Revue des Recherches en Histoire Culture et Art Copyright © Karabuk University http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v6i5.1293 Citation: Vostrikov, I. (2017). Mercenaries in the Army of Hellenistic Athens. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(5), 122-130. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i5.1293 Mercenaries in the Army of Hellenistic Athens Igor V. Vostrikov1 Abstract This article interests in history of armed forces of the antiquity states, their structure, deployment order, the organization of command, evolution of arms, policy strokes, action of armies in the military conflicts, and to their use in internal political fight, as well as to involvement of mercenaries. During the Classical Period of Greek history big fame was gained by armed forces of Athens and Sparta. Athens in the 5th century BC was at the peak of power and pursued active foreign policy which was in many respects supported by powerful army and fleet. The reason of traditionally high interest in history of Athens of the Classical Period including the armed forces history of the polis also lies in it. However Athens and their armed forces suffered a serious loss and got beaten in the Peloponnese war and the final decline of political and military power of Athens occurred after defeat in Lamian war therefore military activity of the polis sharply decreases. Therefore the history of Hellenistic period Athens gets much less attention.
  • Nomos and Phusis in Antiphon's Peri Alãªtheias

    Nomos and Phusis in Antiphon's Peri Alãªtheias

    UC Berkeley Cabinet of the Muses: Rosenmeyer Festschrift Title Nomos and Phusis in Antiphon's Peri Alêtheias Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7kg1w5zm Author Ostwald, Martin Publication Date 1990-04-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California NOMOS AND PHUSIS IN ANTIPHON’S * Martin Ostwald Swarthmore College and University of Pennsylvania The central importance of Antiphon, the author of the tract On Truth, for students of philosophy and history alike, needs no argumPenetr. ‹ N ÉoAt olnhlyy ise ¤hae wthe earliest Athenian sophist intelligible to us, but he is also the most explicit exponent of the nomos-phusis controversy which emerged in Athens in the 420s and was to prove seminal in the development of Western thought; for the historian, its author presents the tantalizing problem whether he is or is not identical with the politician who, according to Thucydides (8.68.1), orchestrated the oligarchical revolution of 411 B.C. Moreover, the publication in 1984 of a new fragment by Maria Serena Funghi1 has renewed interest in both author and tract.2 This spate of recent publications, when added to the formidable array of earlier discussions by a formidable array of scholars,3 may make the addition of yet another interpretation a foolhardy enterprise. Yet it seems possible to show that a new perspective on the tract can be gained, which not only places it more closely into the context of contemporary discussions of nomos and phusis but also takes greater account of the fragmentary nature of the tract, and attempts to do greater justice to POxy.
  • ABSTRACT Constantinos Hasapis, Overcoming the Spartan

    ABSTRACT Constantinos Hasapis, Overcoming the Spartan

    ABSTRACT Constantinos Hasapis, Overcoming the Spartan Phalanx: The Evolution of Greek Battlefield Tactics, 394 BC- 371 BC. (Dr. Anthony Papalas, Thesis Director), Spring 2012 The objective of this thesis is to examine the changes in Greek battlefield tactics in the early fourth century as a response to overthrowing what was widely considered by most of Greece tyranny on the part of Sparta. Sparta's hegemony was based on military might, namely her mastery of phalanx warfare. Therefore the key to dismantling Lacedaemonia's overlordship was to defeat her armies on the battlefield. This thesis will argue that new battle tactics were tried and although there were varying degrees of success, the final victory at Leuctra over the Spartans was due mainly to the use of another phalanx. However, the Theban phalanx was not a merely a copy of Sparta's. New formations, tactics, and battlefield concepts were applied and used successfully when wedded together. Sparta's prospects of maintaining her position of dominance were increasingly bleak. Sparta's phalanx had became more versatile and mobile after the end of the Peloponnesian War but her increasing economic and demographic problems, compounded by outside commitments resulting in imperial overstretch, strained her resources. The additional burden of internal security requirements caused by the need to hold down a massive helot population led to a static position in the face of a dynamic enemy with no such constraints Overcoming The Spartan Phalanx: The Evolution of Greek Battlefield Tactics, 394 BC-371 BC A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Master of Arts in History Constantinos Hasapis Spring 2012 Copyright 2012 Constantinos Hasapis Overcoming the Spartan Phalanx: The Evolution of Greek Battlefield Tactics, 394 BC-371 BC by Constantinos Hasapis APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF THESIS ________________________________ Dr.
  • The Dancing Floor of Ares Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Central Greece

    The Dancing Floor of Ares Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Central Greece

    The Dancing Floor of Ares Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Central Greece Edited by Fabienne Marchand and Hans Beck ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Supplemental Volume 1 (2020) ISSN 0835-3638 Edited by: Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Monica D’Agostini, Andrea Gatzke, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, Nadini Pandey, John Vanderspoel, Connor Whatley, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Assistant Editor: Charlotte Dunn Contents 1 Hans Beck and Fabienne Marchand, Preface 2 Chandra Giroux, Mythologizing Conflict: Memory and the Minyae 21 Laetitia Phialon, The End of a World: Local Conflict and Regional Violence in Mycenaean Boeotia? 46 Hans Beck, From Regional Rivalry to Federalism: Revisiting the Battle of Koroneia (447 BCE) 63 Salvatore Tufano, The Liberation of Thebes (379 BC) as a Theban Revolution. Three Case Studies in Theban Prosopography 86 Alex McAuley, Kai polemou kai eirenes: Military Magistrates at War and at Peace in Hellenistic Boiotia 109 Roy van Wijk, The centrality of Boiotia to Athenian defensive strategy 138 Elena Franchi, Genealogies and Violence. Central Greece in the Making 168 Fabienne Marchand, The Making of a Fetter of Greece: Chalcis in the Hellenistic Period 189 Marcel Piérart, La guerre ou la paix? Deux notes sur les relations entre les Confédérations achaienne et béotienne (224-180 a.C.) Preface The present collection of papers stems from two one-day workshops, the first at McGill University on November 9, 2017, followed by another at the Université de Fribourg on May 24, 2018. Both meetings were part of a wider international collaboration between two projects, the Parochial Polis directed by Hans Beck in Montreal and now at Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, and Fabienne Marchand’s Swiss National Science Foundation Old and New Powers: Boiotian International Relations from Philip II to Augustus.