Proton Radiation for Tumors in the Brain: a Family Connection in the Records of Jennifer Improved Quickly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proton Radiation for Tumors in the Brain: a Family Connection in the Records of Jennifer Improved Quickly Proton Radiation for Tumors in the Brain: a Family Connection In the records of Jennifer improved quickly. She says works for American Medical Response as the department of that she had no side effects from proton an emergency medical technician (EMT) radiation medicine at treatment and, in fact, pursued vigorous and, at this writing, is seeking certification Loma Linda University athletic activities during proton treatment, as a flight medic. She continues to be a Health, it is not uncommon including cross-country running, swimming highly active, athletic young woman. to find patients who are and surfing. Follow-up examinations In 2002, Cheryl Bellerose began members of the same showed complete regression of her tumor to experience unexplained dizziness. immediate or extended and at this writing, 16 years later, she no She went to her doctor, who referred her family. It is unusual, however, longer needs to be followed regularly. to a neurologist. A work-up revealed that to encounter two patients Jennifer says that one of her main she had an acoustic neuroma, a benign from the same family who recollections of proton therapy at tumor of the auditory nerve. Cheryl was were treated for two different Loma Linda was the superb team spirit referred to a surgeon, who recommended types of brain lesions. That is she encountered among the radiation an operation. Cheryl did check out several the case, however, with Jennifer oncologists, nurses and radiation therapy options, including centers in Los Angeles. Gardner and Cheryl Bellerose, technologists she met in the department Cheryl, however, remembered her both of Redlands, California. of radiation medicine. As an athlete younger cousin, Jennifer. At that time In 1997, when she was a teenager, herself, she appreciated this spirit, which Jennifer was already five years past proton Jennifer received proton therapy for included her as the patient. The feeling of treatment for a malignant brain tumor an astrocytoma of the cerebellum and all working together toward a successful and was doing very well. This encouraged brain stem. She had symptoms that treatment outcome was strong, so much Cheryl to wonder whether protons could included headache, vomiting and some so that, Jennifer says, it eventually altered be used for her case as well; she inquired, unsteadiness in walking. She and her her own life plans: she wanted to be and was seen by Dr. Lilia Loredo in the family consulted surgeons, including a part of the medical environment too. department of radiation medicine. pediatric neurosurgeon at Loma Linda Today Jennifer works at Loma Linda Dr. Loredo examined Cheryl and her University Children’s Hospital, and University Health. She is a medical assistant records, including CT scans. She told Cheryl learned that the tumor was inoperable. in the emergency department at Loma she was confident that proton therapy could She did require several surgical Linda University Medical Center. She also be used successfully in her case; Cheryl procedures to relieve hydrocephalus (fluid in the brain), including by means of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Her case was referred to the department of radiation medicine. Jennifer was seen by two radiation oncologists then at Loma Linda, one a specialist in pediatric oncology and the other a specialist in brain tumors. They decided that she was a candidate for proton therapy because her tumor, although causing distressing symptoms, was localized. She was treated in the spring of 1997. Between proton therapy and her surgical procedures (nine altogether), Cousins Jennifer Gardner (left) and Cheryl Bellerose (right) felt confidence in Dr. Loredo’s seeing various places and hiking in the to simple physics. Protons have mass; judgment. Cheryl then began nearby mountains. Today, 11 years after photons, the fundamental particles of a six-week treatment course of her last proton treatment, she needs x-ray beams, do not. Accelerated protons, 30 fractions of proton radiation follow-up visits only every three years. therefore, are much less likely to scatter therapy. She says she experienced The family connection in Cheryl and in tissue than photons are, so they can no side effects from treatment Jennifer’s cases goes on. Two of their reach the target volume using fewer and, more importantly, no loss of uncles have received proton radiation beams than are needed for photons. hearing, either from the tumor or as therapy for cancer of the prostate. Further, protons do not release the bulk a side-effect of radiation treatment. of their energy until they stop in the Proton Therapy for Tumors of the targeted tissue; at that point, they release Central Nervous System (CNS) all of their energy and no tissue beyond In many respects, Jennifer’s and the target is irradiated. Photons release Cheryl’s situations were different: energy all the way to the target and past Jennifer had a malignant tumor that it. Taken together, these are the physical required several surgical interventions reasons that protons can spare normal before and during proton therapy; Cheryl tissue to a much greater extent than is had a benign tumor that was discovered possible with photons. The differences early. In both cases, however, their in dose distribution between proton treatments called for radiation to the brain, and photon beams often are dramatic. and in both cases protons offered a way to deliver that radiation without irradiating other parts of the brain. Sparing tissue that does not need to be irradiated is what proton therapy is all about. Isodose distribution of cavernous sinus meningioma Because the beam can be treated with four proton beams. Colored lines show dose conformed so closely to the from the beams; red indicates the highest dose, blue, the volume that needs to be irradiated, lowest. Note that most of the brain receives no radiation. Dr. Loredo and other radiation The ragged green line represents the brain stem, most oncologists in the department of of which is also avoided by the proton beams. From radiation medicine can deliver the Slater JD, Loredo LN, Chung A, Bush DA, Patyal B, high doses needed to control the Johnson WD, Hsu FP, Slater JM. Fractionated proton tumor without causing radiation radiotherapy for benign cavernous sinus meningiomas. damage to nearby brain tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:e633-637. This is always important, but especially so when treating in At the time she was treated, Cheryl the brain and even more so worked at the School of Dentistry on when treating children, whose the Loma Linda University Medical tissues are still developing. Center campus. “My treatments Both Cheryl and Jennifer Comparing treatment plans using intensity-modulated were easy,” she says. “I worked reported no side effects from X-ray therapy (left) and proton radiation therapy for a right next door, so every day I proton therapy. Both continued to 35-year-old patient with a history of seizure from a grade II would walk over to the hospital, lead active lives during treatment. oligodendroglioma. Tumor location prevented complete surgical get my proton therapy, and This was made possible by the removal.The proton plan spares the greatest volume of normal walk back to work.” Cheryl says tissue-sparing capabilities of tissue. From Gridley DS, Grove RS, Loredo LN, Wroe AJ, she felt very comfortable with proton therapy. Although needed Slater JD. Proton-beam therapy for tumors of the CNS. the treatment setting and conformal doses of radiation can Expert Rev Neurother 2010 Feb;10(2):319-330. personnel in the department be delivered to brain volumes of radiation medicine. with modern forms of x-ray “I loved the Christian therapy such as IMRT, surrounding tissue Dr. Loredo, who treated Cheryl and atmosphere,” she says; “it cannot be spared from lower doses of treats many of the CNS patients at was a good place to be.” radiation, as is the case with protons. It Loma Linda University Health, perhaps Cheryl has since is this ability to spare tissue that helped describes the proton advantage best. retired from her job at prevent hearing loss in Cheryl’s case, and “We want to destroy the tumor and the School of Dentistry. development problems in Jennifer’s. allow normal tissues to keep functioning She and her husband The reason that proton therapy is normally. The best way to do both love to travel and so advantageous in treating tumors in is to conform the dose to the tumor live an active life, the brain and in children comes down cells and leave the rest alone.” LLUMCMKTG#PTC-006-13/1113/1000.
Recommended publications
  • A Study on Tumor Suppressor Genes Mutations Associated with Different Pppathologicalpathological Cccolorectalcolorectal Lllesions.Lesions
    A Study on Tumor Suppressor Genes Mutations Associated with Different PPPathologicalPathological CCColorectalColorectal LLLesions.Lesions. Thesis Submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree of Science in Biochemistry By Salwa Naeim Abd ElEl----KaderKader Mater M.Sc. in Biochemistry, 2002 Biological Applications Department Nuclear Research Center Atomic Energy Authority Under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Amani F.H Nour El ---Deen Prof. Dr. Abdel Hady Ali Abdel Wahab Professor of Biochemistry Professor of Biochemistry Biochemistry Department and Molecular Biology Faculty of Science Cancer Biology Department Ain Shams University National Cancer Institute Cairo University Prof. DrDr.MohsenMohsen Ismail Mohamed Dr. Azza Salah Helmy Professor of Clinical Pathology Biological Assistant Professor of Biochemistry Applications Department Biochemistry Department Nuclear Research Center Faculty of Science Atomic Energy Authority Ain Shams University 2012011111 ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ﺇِﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﹶﻣﺮﻩ ﺇِﺫﹶﺍ ﺃﹶﺭﺍﺩ ﺷﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﺃﹶﹾﻥ ﻳﹸﻘﻮﻝﹶ ﻟﹶﻪ ﻛﹸـﻦ ﻓﹶﻴﻜﹸـﻮ ﻥ ﹸ ””” ٨٢٨٨٢٢٨٢““““ﻓﹶﺴﺒﺤﺎﻥﹶ ﺍﱠﻟﺬِﻱ ﺑِﻴﺪِﻩِ ﻣﻠﹶﻜﹸﻮﺕ ﻛﹸـﻞﱢ ﺷـﻲﺀٍ ﻭﺇِﻟﹶﻴـﻪِ ﺗﺮﺟﻌﻮﻥﹶ ””” ٨٣٨٨٣٣٨٣““““ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ رة (٨٢-٨٣) I declare that this thesis has been composed by myself and the work there in has not been submitted for a degree at this or any other university. Salwa Naeim Abd El-Kader Matter To my dear husband and family Their love, encouragement and help made my studies possible and to them I owe everything. Thank you Salwa Naeim Abd El-Kader Matter Acknowledgement First of all, thanks to Allah the most merciful for guiding me and giving me the strength to complete this work. It is pleasure to express my deepest thanks and profound respect to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Your Pathology Report: Benign Breast Conditions
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Understanding Your Pathology Report: Benign Breast Conditions When your breast was biopsied, the samples taken were studied under the microscope by a specialized doctor with many years of training called a pathologist. The pathologist sends your doctor a report that gives a diagnosis for each sample taken. Information in this report will be used to help manage your care. The questions and answers that follow are meant to help you understand medical language you might find in the pathology report from a breast biopsy1, such as a needle biopsy or an excision biopsy. In a needle biopsy, a hollow needle is used to remove a sample of an abnormal area. An excision biopsy removes the entire abnormal area, often with some of the surrounding normal tissue. An excision biopsy is much like a type of breast-conserving surgery2 called a lumpectomy. What does it mean if my report uses any of the following terms: adenosis, sclerosing adenosis, apocrine metaplasia, cysts, columnar cell change, columnar cell hyperplasia, collagenous spherulosis, duct ectasia, columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions (CAPSS), papillomatosis, or fibrocystic changes? All of these are terms that describe benign (non-cancerous) changes that the pathologist might see under the microscope. They do not need to be treated. They are of no concern when found along with cancer. More information about many of these can be found in Non-Cancerous Breast Conditions3. What does it mean if my report says fat necrosis? Fat necrosis is a benign condition that is not linked to cancer risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Presentation
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2892 Nasal Chondromesenchymal Hamartoma with Skull Base and Orbital Involvement: Case Presentation Denis A. Golbin 1 , Anastasia P. Ektova 2 , Maxim O. Demin 3 , Nikolay Lasunin 4 , Vasily A. Cherekaev 1 1. Skull Base and Craniofacial Surgery, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, RUS 2. Pathology, Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, Moscow, RUS 3. Pediatric Neurosurgery, N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, RUS 4. Neuro-Oncology, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, RUS Corresponding author: Denis A. Golbin, [email protected] Abstract Nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma (NCMH) is a rare benign tumor of the sinonasal tract in children with possible orbit and skull base involvement. We present the 57th published observation of this kind of tumor. A 25-month-old female patient presented with recurrent mass lesion of the sinonasal tract. According to her history, she had feeding difficulties and nasal obstruction since birth. She underwent partial resection at eight months of age via transfacial approach in the local hospital. Due to progression of tumor remnants, a second surgery was performed using an endoscopic endonasal approach resulting in subtotal resection. At 12 months of follow-up, a good postoperative result was observed with no signs of tumor progression despite incomplete resection. Histological and immunohistochemical examination of the biopsy specimens is presented. Comparison of specimens obtained from each of the two surgeries showed a difference in histological patterns. Endoscopic endonasal approach is the mainstay of surgical management. In case of incomplete resection, careful follow-up MRI studies should be recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAIN TUMORS Info Sheet
    ROSWELL PARK COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER BRAIN TUMORS Info Sheet FAST FACTS WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW When cells in the brain grow and multiply out of control, they can form a tumor which may be malignant (cancerous) or benign (not cancerous). Roswell Park treats both malignant and benign tumors in the brain. Malignant brain tumors contain cancer cells and tend to grow rapidly and invade healthy brain tissue. Many of these are treatable and new therapies can help patients live longer and preserve quality of life. THERE ARE Benign brain tumors do not contain cancer cells. They rarely invade nearby MORE THAN tissue or spread to other parts of the body. Although a benign tumor is not DIFFERENT cancerous, it still needs treatment because it can press on the brain as it 120 TYPES OF grows in the skull. BRAIN TUMORS ARE YOU AT RISK? Brain tumors are relatively rare. They can occur at any age but are most Brain tumors common in children and older adults. You may have an increased risk for occur mostly in developing a brain tumor if you have one of these factors: children younger in adults Prior radiation treatment for other medical conditions such as leukemia. than older than Certain genetic conditions in your family. About 5% of brain tumors are linked to: 15 65 Neurofibromatosis Tuberous sclerosis & Von Hippel-Lindau disease Li-Frameni syndrome SYMPTOMS TO TELL YOUR DOCTOR The chance Persistent daily headaches of developing Changes in speech, vision or hearing a malignant Problems balancing or walking brain Changes in mood, personality or ability to concentrate tumor Confusion or difficulty with memory is LESS Muscle jerking or twitching THAN (seizures or convulsions) Numbness, weakness or 1% tingling in arms or legs 1-800-ROSWELL (1-800-767-9355) | RoswellPark.org If you have a brain tumor, WHY ROSWELL PARK FOR BRAIN TUMORS? you need a second opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA Or KRAS Mutations
    pISSN 1598-2998, eISSN 2005-9256 Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):1219-1228 https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.688 Original Article Open Access Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA or KRAS Mutations Aiko Ogasawara, MD1 Purpose Taro Hihara, PhD2 Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive source for liquid biopsy to understand Daisuke Shintani, MD1 molecular phenotypes of a tumor non-invasively, which is also expected to be both a diag- nostic and prognostic marker. PIK3CA and KRAS are among the most frequently mutated Akira Yabuno, MD1 genes in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In addition, their hotspot mutations have already MD, PhD1 Yuji Ikeda, been identified and are ready for a highly sensitive analysis. Our aim is to clarify the signifi- 2 Kenji Tai, MSc cance of PIK3CA and KRAS mutations in the plasma of EOC patients as tumor-informed 1 Keiichi Fujiwara, MD, PhD ctDNA. Keisuke Watanabe, BSc2 Materials and Methods Kosei Hasegawa, MD, PhD1 We screened 306 patients with ovarian tumors for somatic PIK3CA or KRAS mutations. A total of 85 EOC patients had somatic PIK3CA and/or KRAS mutations, and the correspon- ding mutations were subsequently analyzed using a droplet digital polymerase chain reac- 1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, tion in their plasma. Saitama Medical University International Results Medical Center, Hidaka, 2Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan The detection rates for ctDNA were 27% in EOC patients. Advanced stage and positive peritoneal cytology were associated with higher frequency of ctDNA detection. Preopera- tive ctDNA detection was found to be an indicator of outcomes, and multivariate analy- sis revealed that ctDNA remained an independent risk factor for recurrence (p=0.010).
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Tumors
    Understanding Brain Tumors Jana, diagnosed in 1999, with her husband, Paul. SAMPLE COPYRIGHTED What Is a Brain Tumor? A brain tumor, like other tumors, is a collection of cells that multiply at a rapid rate. The tumor may cause damage by pressing on or spreading into healthy parts of the brain and interfering with function. Brain tumors can be benign or malignant. They can develop outside or inside the brain. A benign tumor is noncancerous but not necessarily harmless. Benign tumors tend to grow slowly. Symptoms may not appear for a long time. These tumors are often detected incidentally, or by accident. For example, a benign tumor may be discovered when a brain scan is performed because of a headache or after a car accident. A benign tumor usually has distinct borders and is less likely to cause damage to surrounding tissue. Malignant tumors are cancerous. Malignant tumors tend to grow aggressively and spread to surrounding tissues. Despite treatment, they may recur either in the same place or in another location. A malignant tumor, if left untreated, can ultimately lead to death. Malignant brain tumors are among the most difficult types of cancer to fight. Malignant brain tumors are classified as either primary or secondary. A primary tumor means the cancerous cells start in the brain. In a secondary—or metastatic—tumor, the cancerous cells start elsewhere in the body. They then spread through the bloodstream to the brain. This process is known as metastasis. More than 120 different types of brain tumors have been identified. What Causes Brain Tumors? When diagnosed with a brain tumor, a person might wonder, why me? Unfortunately, the current understanding of the causes and possible risk factors for brain tumors is limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Tumor Information
    Tumor Information Bone Tumors Soft Tissue Tumors Bone Tumors Bone tumors are a rare cause of musculoskeletal pain but should always be considered in the patient with otherwise unexplained pain. Most bone tumors present with pain and/or a mass. Care must be taken to ensure the correct diagnosis is made, and early consultation with an orthopaedic oncologist is advised to avoid potential complications. In general, these tumors are best treated at a referral practice that specializes in bone tumors. Benign Presenting symptoms Benign bone tumors can have a wide variety of presenting symptoms; in general, benign bone tumors present with pain. Tumors can occur in any bone, and can occur in all age groups. In general, these tumors are a rare cause of musculoskeletal pain, but should be considered when the diagnosis is in question. Often, benign tumors are found incidentally when patients are imaged for other reasons (i.e., a football player hurts his knee and gets an X- ray to rule out fracture; a suspicious tumor is seen). These are usually benign tumors, but need to be carefully evaluated by an orthopaedic tumor specialist. Diagnostic Imaging Imaging is necessary to diagnose a bone tumor. Often, multiple tests are ordered, but must be evaluated carefully by an orthopaedic tumor specialist to make sure that the most accurate diagnosis is rendered. X-Ray Usually done in the office, this is the most basic imaging test. Plain X- rays can provide essential diagnostic information, and must be of high quality. It is not uncommon to have to repeat these in order to make sure a high quality digital image is obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • BENIGN TUMORS of the STOMACH Benign Tumors of The
    BENIGN TUMORS OF THE STOMACH JAMES F. MINNES, M.D., AND CHARLES F. GESCHICKTER, M.D. (From the Surgical Pathological Laboratory, Department oj Surgery Johns Hopkins Hospital) Benign tumors of the stomach, though of more infrequent occurrence than malignant growths of that organ, are sufficiently common to warrant atten­ tion. In recent years an extensive literature has accumulated on their inci­ dence, pathological and clinical features, and roentgen diagnosis. They are frequently confused clinically with malignant and inflammatory lesions, and may give rise to complications which demand immediate surgical intervention. It is the purpose of this paper to review briefly the literature and to present the clinical and pathological features of 50 benign tumors of the stomach recorded in the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1889 to the present day. TYPES AND INCIDENCE Benign tumors may arise from any of the several coats of the stomach: the mucosa, submucosa, muscularis, or serosa. According to the tissue of origin they may be divided into two groups: epithelial and mesenchymal. Among the epithelial tumors are adenomas, adenopapillomas, adenomyomas, and fibro-adenomyomas. Chief among the mesenchymal tumors are the leio­ myomas, fibromas, lipomas, neurofibromas, and the rare angiomas and osteo­ mas. Finally there is a group of lesions which are not truly neoplastic but are usually included with tumors. These include cysts-simple blood or lymph cysts, dermoid and echinococcus cysts-and rarely embryonic rests of the pancreas. The absolute incidence of these benign tumors, as well as their relative frequency as compared with malignant gastric tumors, is difficult to determine. Eusterman and Senty reported a series of 27 benign tumors, which represented 1.3 per cent of all gastric neoplasms operated on at the Mayo Clinic between 1907 and 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
    EPA/630/P-03/001B March 2005 Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Forum U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC DISCLAIMER Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1-1 1.1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE GUIDELINES ........................ 1-1 1.2. ORGANIZATION AND APPLICATION OF THE GUIDELINES ........... 1-3 1.2.1. Organization .............................................. 1-3 1.2.2. Application ............................................... 1-5 1.3. KEY FEATURES OF THE CANCER GUIDELINES ..................... 1-7 1.3.1. Critical Analysis of Available Information as the Starting Point for Evaluation ............................................... 1-7 1.3.2. Mode of Action ........................................... 1-10 1.3.3. Weight of Evidence Narrative ............................... 1-11 1.3.4. Dose-response Assessment .................................. 1-12 1.3.5. Susceptible Populations and Lifestages ........................ 1-13 1.3.6. Evaluating Risks from Childhood Exposures .................... 1-15 1.3.7. Emphasis on Characterization ............................... 1-21 2. HAZARD ASSESSMENT .................................................. 2-1 2.1. OVERVIEW OF HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION . 2-1 2.1.1. Analyses of Data ........................................... 2-1 2.1.2. Presentation of Results ...................................... 2-1 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Hamartoma of the Breast: Report of a Case and Review of the Current Literature
    Medical Journal of the Volume 14 Islamic Republic of Iran Number 2 Summer 1379 August 2000 GIANT HAMARTOMA OF THE BREAST: REPORT OF A CASE AND REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LITERATURE D. FARROKH, M.D. rl'om the Department 0/ Radiology, Imam Reza Medical Center, Mashhad University 0/ Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Islamic Republic o/Iran. ABSTRACT Hamartoma of the breast is a rare benign breast lesion which is unfamiliar to most clinicians, although the mammographic features are usually characteristic. Hamartomas are composed of ducts, lobules, fat and fibrous tissue. These benign lesions are likely to be increasingly diagnosed because of routine screening and hence clinical awareness is paramount to prevent these lesions from being over­ treated. A patient who presented with a soft mobile breast lump which was later diagnosed to be a giant breast hamartoma is presented along with a brief review of the current literature. MJIRI, Vol. 14, No.2, 187-189, 2000. INTRODUCTION tency and there was no nipple or skin abnormality. Ultrasonography didn't show any discrete mass lesion, Breast hamartomas are relatively rare benign tumor-like although the mass was completely palpable. So a mammo­ lesions which result more frombreast dysgenesis than from gram was performed which demonstrated a large well-de­ a tumoral process. Histologically, they are composed of fi­ fined mass occupying almost one-quadrant of the breast. brous tissue, fat, lobules and ducts. The mass was confined by a thin capsule, and appeared to Previous mammographic reports have characterized contain fat and mUltiple small soft tissue densities-the typi­ these lesions as well-delineated masses composed of cal radiographic appearance of a breast hamartoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Background Cancer
    Teacher Background Cancer Note: The Teacher Background Section is meant to provide information for the teacher about the topic and is tied very closely to the PowerPoint slide show. For greater understanding, the teacher may want to play the slide show as he/she reads the background section. For the students, the slide show can be used in its entirety or can be edited as necessary for a given class. What is Cancer? The term cancer was coined by the Greek physician, Hippocrates (460 – 370 BC) from the Greek word karkinos (carcinos) meaning crab which he used to describe the fingerlike projections of tumors. The Roman physician Celsus (50 – 28 BC) translated karkinos, the Greek word for crab, into cancer, the Latin word for crab. Roman physician Galen (130 – 200 AD) used the word oncos (Greek for swelling) to describe tumors. Tumors have been seen in Egyptian mummies with growths suggestive of bone tumors and described in hieroglyphics as far back as 3000 BC when 8 cases of breast tumors or ulcers were reported along with cauterization, using a tool called the fire drill, as the means of destroying the tumor.(1) How Do Normal Cells Differ From Cancer Cells? In normal cells, the rate of new cell growth and old cell death are kept in balance. During mitosis, the cells divide in a controlled fashion. When cells, like skin, age and slough or become damaged, basal cells will replace the cells. To replace the old or damaged cell, the basal cell divides forming two cells – one cell remains as a basal cell and the other becomes part of the tissue (skin in this case) and loses the ability to divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Book 2 - Cancer Characteristics and Selection of Cases
    SEER Program Self InstructionalManualfor Cancer Registrars Cancer Characteristics and Selection of Cases Book Two Third Edition US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL FOR TUMOR REGISTRARS Book 2 - Cancer Characteristics and Selection of Cases Third Edition SEER Program Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute Editor in Chief: Evelyn M. Shambaugh Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute Assisted by Self-Instructional Manual Committee: Constance Percy Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute Dr. Robert F. Ryan, Chairman Tulane University School of Medicine Mildred A. Weiss University of California, Los Angeles Ruth N. Pavel Novotny San Francisco, California Mary A. Kruse Bethesda, Maryland Louisiana Regional Medical Program under the direction of C.Dennis Fink, Ph.D., Program Director, HumRRO and Robert F. Ryan, M.D., Technical Advisor, Tulane University. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health NIH Publication No. 95-993 BOOK 2 CANCER CHARACTERISTICS AND SELECTION OF CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS BOOK 2: CANCER CHARACTERISTICS AND SELECTION OF CASES Page Section A--Objectives and Content of Instructional Book 2 ..................... 1 Section B--Benign and Malignant Tumors .................................. 5 Section C--Some Characteristics of Cancer ................................. 19 Section D--Diagnostic Descriptions of Cancer ............................... 33 Section
    [Show full text]