Are Oncogenes Sufficient to Cause Human Cancer?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Are Oncogenes Sufficient to Cause Human Cancer? COMMENTARY Are oncogenes sufficient to cause human cancer? Scott E. Woodman and Gordon B. Mills1 Melanoma Medical Oncology, Systems Biology, Kleberg Center for Molecular Markers, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030 fundamental aim of cancer re- contrast, the frequency of comutations in sequences is warranted to identify the search is to identify the molecu- FGFR3 and KRAS or PIK3CA and KRAS spectrum of mutations in this benign tu- A lar changes that cause normal was lower than predicted by chance, sug- mor and explore the mechanisms pre- cells to evolve into malignant gesting either a lack of selective pressure for venting malignant conversion. tumors. Malignant transformation has both mutations to occur or a negative in- To examine the functional conse- been proposed to occur as a consequence teraction between the consequences of quences of the oncogene mutations in of the accumulation of genomic aberra- each mutation. SK, Hafner et al. (1) examine phosphory- tions that successively overcome the cel- Multiple lines of evidence, including lation of ERK and AKT. Compared lular barriers to malignancy. Although their presence in SK, indicate that muta- with normal skin, SK showed significantly a concerted effort has been made to tions in oncogenes are insufficient to in- elevated levels of phosphorylated AKT. discover the complement of molecular duce malignancy. Patients with germline These findings are consistent with many aberrations required for malignant trans- mutations in FGFR3 that result in the tyrosine kinase receptors, which prefer- formation, the spectrum of events that same codon change as in somatic muta- entially signal through the PI3K–AKT must occur in a single cell, including which tions found in SK do not develop malig- pathway, as opposed to RAS–RAF mu- oncogene activation and tumor suppressor nant epithelial skin tumors at increased tants, which signal primarily through gene inactivation events can cooperate frequency (2). The authors show that the the MEK–ERK pathway (6). It will be of to induce malignant transformation, has sites of mutations found at the highest interest to learn if SK harboring KRAS or remained elusive. A number of benign le- frequency in SK are found at much lower HRAS mutations also exhibits a preferen- sions without malignant potential accu- frequency in malignant tumors and vice tial signaling profile linked to ERK. The mulate genomic aberrations and have the versa (1). Although a subset of the muta- interaction of oncogene activation and potential to inform on the changes that tions found in SK exhibits lower trans- tumor suppressor loss in malignant cells are tolerated in benign tumors; however, forming activity than those found more typically drives cellular proliferation and fi they are insuf cient to induce malignant frequently in malignant tumors, many of survival programs. The oncogene muta- transformation. In PNAS, Hafner et al. (1) these mutations do predispose to tumor tions in SK were not sufficient to alter the comprehensively investigate the mutation development in animal models. The sites proliferation index, as measured by ele- status, mechanistic barriers to malignancy, of FGFR3 and PIK3CA mutations in SK vated Ki67 levels, or induction of apopto- and clonal relationship of seborrheic are similar to those observed in pre- sis, as measured by activated caspase 3 keratoses (SK), a tumor lineage that is cancerous and less aggressive forms of levels. Thus, SK has the capacity to abro- without malignant potential. bladder and prostate cancers, compatible gate the expected functional outcomes with a low malignant potential (3, 4). of activation of RAS/ERK and PI3K/ Discussion However, it is important to note that the AKT pathways. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) frequency and spectrum of mutations in Senescence has been proposed to play PIK3CA and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic vary markedly across tumor line- a major role in preventing malignant PIK3CA subunit (PIK3CA) mutations have been ages, and the mutations in ob- transformation of melanocytic nevi (7). previously identified in SK (2, 3). Hafner served in SK are located at hot spots that Indeed, nevi often harbor the same BRAF et al. (1) perform an extensive analysis of are seen recurrently in malignant tumors. (V600E) mutation present in ∼60% of hot spot mutations in genes in the FGFR3– Nevertheless, the mutations in cases where malignant melanoma; however, melano- RAS–MAPK and PI3K–AKT pathways in members of both the PI3K and RAS cytic nevi rarely become malignant (8). 175 independent SK lesions from 25 SK pathways are mutated were not sufficient BRAF (V600E) expression in mouse patients. They showed a high frequency of to develop malignant tumors. models results in induction of senescence FGFR3 (71%), PIK3CA (50%), KRAS Hafner et al. (1) observe that, unlike in melanocytes, and senescent markers are (20%), EGFR (7%), HRAS (3%), and AKT many malignant tumors (5), SK is rela- highly expressed in human melanocytic (2%) mutations in the benign tumors (1). A tively genomically stable, and inactivating nevi (9). In contrast, BRAF (V600E) ex- complete sequence analysis is likely to mutations in the tumor suppressors phos- pression in the setting of PTEN loss identify an even higher mutation rate, sug- phatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), tu- in murine models is sufficient to induce gesting that most, if not all, SK lesions have berous sclerosis 1 (TSC1), or p53 are rare metastatic melanomas (10). Oncogene- at least one and likely several putative or absent. Thus, the malignant potential of induced senescence has been similarly oncogenic mutations. Strikingly, despite oncogene mutations is likely lineage-de- observed with HRAS, KRAS, or AKT their lack of malignant potential, 89% of pendent, interacting with intrinsic gene expression and can be overcome by loss SK had at least one mutation, and 45% expression patterns, and it must occur in of specific tumor suppressors (7). Using had more than one mutation in a well- the context of other genomic aberrations, β-galactosidase activity and a set of se- characterized oncogene. Mutations ob- likely including loss of tumor suppressor nescence markers, Hafner et al. (1) fail to served in SK are present in malignant function, to facilitate malignant trans- observe evidence of senescence in SK. tumors and when expressed in transgenic formation. Although the paucity of muta- mice, are sufficient to induce tumors. Thus, tions in tumor suppressors and the relative a potent mechanism must constrain malig- genomic stability in SK likely provide Author contributions: S.E.W. and G.B.M. wrote the paper. nant conversion in SK. The frequency of a partial explanation for the lack of ma- The authors declare no conflict of interest. comutations in FGFR3 and PIK3CA was lignant transformation, further compre- See companion article on page 20780. approximately that predicted by chance, hensive analysis of SK both in terms of 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: suggesting that they are not coselected. In genomic events and functional con- [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1015563107 PNAS Early Edition | 1of2 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Further markers of accumulated DNA pendent SK lesions. Intriguingly, in most function; this suggests that this alteration damage were also absent in SK. Thus, an cases, each SK lesion showed only a single may be an essential hit lacking in SK, ex- as yet unexplained mechanism must con- FGFR3 mutation, suggesting that each SK plaining the failure to acquire a malig- strain malignant transformation in SK. lesion likely represents the outgrowth of nant phenotype. Many possible mechanisms may account a dominant subclone from the original SK Angiomyolipomas, the most common for the nonmalignant potential of cells clone. An analysis of mutations at the benign tumors of the kidney, support the apart from senescence, including in- single cell level will be required to ensure notion that tumor suppressor loss is an hibitory feedback signals, lack of a critical that the multiple mutations detected in an important precondition for metastatic pattern of genetic aberrations, and epige- individual SK lesion occur in a single or competence. Angiomyolipomas can arise netic phenomena that cannot be de- different subclone. sporadically but are common features of termined by the techniques used in this Nonmalignant or low-grade urothelial lymphangiomyomatosis (LAM), which study. Feedback mechanisms for the tumors that derive from an epithelial – – arises in patients with tuberous sclerosis. MEK ERK and PI3K AKT pathways structure related to skin may inform the The proliferating smooth muscle cells have been described (11, 12). In addition, findings of Hafner et al. (1). These tumors fi FGFR3 within LAM associated with tuberous FGFR3 is suf cient to induce forkhead frequently harbor the same muta- sclerosis are clones of the smooth muscle box protein N1 (FOXN1) expression and tions, tend to be genomically stable, and cells in renal angiomyolipomas (16). An- subsequent differentiation (13). FOXN1 arise in a mulifocal manner (14). Two giomyolipomas harbor mutations in either expression caused squamous cell carci- theories have been proposed to explain TSC1 or TSC2, whose protein products noma cells to transition to a benign SK- multifocality of urothelial cancers. The like phenotype. An investigation into the monoclonal theory holds that a single hamartin and tuberin inhibit the Ras ho- epigenetic alterations within SK and other transformed cell proliferates and spreads molog Rheb; this activates the mTOR benign tumors, as well as the surrounding throughout the urothelium by intraluminal within the target of rapamycin complex 1 normal skin, may yield further clues as implantation or intraepithelial migration. (TORC1 complex). Loss of TSC1 or TSC2 to the mechanisms that prevent malignant The oligoclonal theory holds that a function stimulates signaling through the transformation. carcinogen causes independent trans- TORC1 complex (17). Angiomyolipomas Using X-chromosome inactivation, the formation of cells in different locations represent a curious example of a benign study by Hafner et al.
Recommended publications
  • A Study on Tumor Suppressor Genes Mutations Associated with Different Pppathologicalpathological Cccolorectalcolorectal Lllesions.Lesions
    A Study on Tumor Suppressor Genes Mutations Associated with Different PPPathologicalPathological CCColorectalColorectal LLLesions.Lesions. Thesis Submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree of Science in Biochemistry By Salwa Naeim Abd ElEl----KaderKader Mater M.Sc. in Biochemistry, 2002 Biological Applications Department Nuclear Research Center Atomic Energy Authority Under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Amani F.H Nour El ---Deen Prof. Dr. Abdel Hady Ali Abdel Wahab Professor of Biochemistry Professor of Biochemistry Biochemistry Department and Molecular Biology Faculty of Science Cancer Biology Department Ain Shams University National Cancer Institute Cairo University Prof. DrDr.MohsenMohsen Ismail Mohamed Dr. Azza Salah Helmy Professor of Clinical Pathology Biological Assistant Professor of Biochemistry Applications Department Biochemistry Department Nuclear Research Center Faculty of Science Atomic Energy Authority Ain Shams University 2012011111 ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ﺇِﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﹶﻣﺮﻩ ﺇِﺫﹶﺍ ﺃﹶﺭﺍﺩ ﺷﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﺃﹶﹾﻥ ﻳﹸﻘﻮﻝﹶ ﻟﹶﻪ ﻛﹸـﻦ ﻓﹶﻴﻜﹸـﻮ ﻥ ﹸ ””” ٨٢٨٨٢٢٨٢““““ﻓﹶﺴﺒﺤﺎﻥﹶ ﺍﱠﻟﺬِﻱ ﺑِﻴﺪِﻩِ ﻣﻠﹶﻜﹸﻮﺕ ﻛﹸـﻞﱢ ﺷـﻲﺀٍ ﻭﺇِﻟﹶﻴـﻪِ ﺗﺮﺟﻌﻮﻥﹶ ””” ٨٣٨٨٣٣٨٣““““ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ رة (٨٢-٨٣) I declare that this thesis has been composed by myself and the work there in has not been submitted for a degree at this or any other university. Salwa Naeim Abd El-Kader Matter To my dear husband and family Their love, encouragement and help made my studies possible and to them I owe everything. Thank you Salwa Naeim Abd El-Kader Matter Acknowledgement First of all, thanks to Allah the most merciful for guiding me and giving me the strength to complete this work. It is pleasure to express my deepest thanks and profound respect to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Your Pathology Report: Benign Breast Conditions
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Understanding Your Pathology Report: Benign Breast Conditions When your breast was biopsied, the samples taken were studied under the microscope by a specialized doctor with many years of training called a pathologist. The pathologist sends your doctor a report that gives a diagnosis for each sample taken. Information in this report will be used to help manage your care. The questions and answers that follow are meant to help you understand medical language you might find in the pathology report from a breast biopsy1, such as a needle biopsy or an excision biopsy. In a needle biopsy, a hollow needle is used to remove a sample of an abnormal area. An excision biopsy removes the entire abnormal area, often with some of the surrounding normal tissue. An excision biopsy is much like a type of breast-conserving surgery2 called a lumpectomy. What does it mean if my report uses any of the following terms: adenosis, sclerosing adenosis, apocrine metaplasia, cysts, columnar cell change, columnar cell hyperplasia, collagenous spherulosis, duct ectasia, columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions (CAPSS), papillomatosis, or fibrocystic changes? All of these are terms that describe benign (non-cancerous) changes that the pathologist might see under the microscope. They do not need to be treated. They are of no concern when found along with cancer. More information about many of these can be found in Non-Cancerous Breast Conditions3. What does it mean if my report says fat necrosis? Fat necrosis is a benign condition that is not linked to cancer risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Presentation
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2892 Nasal Chondromesenchymal Hamartoma with Skull Base and Orbital Involvement: Case Presentation Denis A. Golbin 1 , Anastasia P. Ektova 2 , Maxim O. Demin 3 , Nikolay Lasunin 4 , Vasily A. Cherekaev 1 1. Skull Base and Craniofacial Surgery, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, RUS 2. Pathology, Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, Moscow, RUS 3. Pediatric Neurosurgery, N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, RUS 4. Neuro-Oncology, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, RUS Corresponding author: Denis A. Golbin, [email protected] Abstract Nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma (NCMH) is a rare benign tumor of the sinonasal tract in children with possible orbit and skull base involvement. We present the 57th published observation of this kind of tumor. A 25-month-old female patient presented with recurrent mass lesion of the sinonasal tract. According to her history, she had feeding difficulties and nasal obstruction since birth. She underwent partial resection at eight months of age via transfacial approach in the local hospital. Due to progression of tumor remnants, a second surgery was performed using an endoscopic endonasal approach resulting in subtotal resection. At 12 months of follow-up, a good postoperative result was observed with no signs of tumor progression despite incomplete resection. Histological and immunohistochemical examination of the biopsy specimens is presented. Comparison of specimens obtained from each of the two surgeries showed a difference in histological patterns. Endoscopic endonasal approach is the mainstay of surgical management. In case of incomplete resection, careful follow-up MRI studies should be recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAIN TUMORS Info Sheet
    ROSWELL PARK COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER BRAIN TUMORS Info Sheet FAST FACTS WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW When cells in the brain grow and multiply out of control, they can form a tumor which may be malignant (cancerous) or benign (not cancerous). Roswell Park treats both malignant and benign tumors in the brain. Malignant brain tumors contain cancer cells and tend to grow rapidly and invade healthy brain tissue. Many of these are treatable and new therapies can help patients live longer and preserve quality of life. THERE ARE Benign brain tumors do not contain cancer cells. They rarely invade nearby MORE THAN tissue or spread to other parts of the body. Although a benign tumor is not DIFFERENT cancerous, it still needs treatment because it can press on the brain as it 120 TYPES OF grows in the skull. BRAIN TUMORS ARE YOU AT RISK? Brain tumors are relatively rare. They can occur at any age but are most Brain tumors common in children and older adults. You may have an increased risk for occur mostly in developing a brain tumor if you have one of these factors: children younger in adults Prior radiation treatment for other medical conditions such as leukemia. than older than Certain genetic conditions in your family. About 5% of brain tumors are linked to: 15 65 Neurofibromatosis Tuberous sclerosis & Von Hippel-Lindau disease Li-Frameni syndrome SYMPTOMS TO TELL YOUR DOCTOR The chance Persistent daily headaches of developing Changes in speech, vision or hearing a malignant Problems balancing or walking brain Changes in mood, personality or ability to concentrate tumor Confusion or difficulty with memory is LESS Muscle jerking or twitching THAN (seizures or convulsions) Numbness, weakness or 1% tingling in arms or legs 1-800-ROSWELL (1-800-767-9355) | RoswellPark.org If you have a brain tumor, WHY ROSWELL PARK FOR BRAIN TUMORS? you need a second opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA Or KRAS Mutations
    pISSN 1598-2998, eISSN 2005-9256 Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):1219-1228 https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.688 Original Article Open Access Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA or KRAS Mutations Aiko Ogasawara, MD1 Purpose Taro Hihara, PhD2 Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive source for liquid biopsy to understand Daisuke Shintani, MD1 molecular phenotypes of a tumor non-invasively, which is also expected to be both a diag- nostic and prognostic marker. PIK3CA and KRAS are among the most frequently mutated Akira Yabuno, MD1 genes in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In addition, their hotspot mutations have already MD, PhD1 Yuji Ikeda, been identified and are ready for a highly sensitive analysis. Our aim is to clarify the signifi- 2 Kenji Tai, MSc cance of PIK3CA and KRAS mutations in the plasma of EOC patients as tumor-informed 1 Keiichi Fujiwara, MD, PhD ctDNA. Keisuke Watanabe, BSc2 Materials and Methods Kosei Hasegawa, MD, PhD1 We screened 306 patients with ovarian tumors for somatic PIK3CA or KRAS mutations. A total of 85 EOC patients had somatic PIK3CA and/or KRAS mutations, and the correspon- ding mutations were subsequently analyzed using a droplet digital polymerase chain reac- 1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, tion in their plasma. Saitama Medical University International Results Medical Center, Hidaka, 2Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan The detection rates for ctDNA were 27% in EOC patients. Advanced stage and positive peritoneal cytology were associated with higher frequency of ctDNA detection. Preopera- tive ctDNA detection was found to be an indicator of outcomes, and multivariate analy- sis revealed that ctDNA remained an independent risk factor for recurrence (p=0.010).
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Tumors
    Understanding Brain Tumors Jana, diagnosed in 1999, with her husband, Paul. SAMPLE COPYRIGHTED What Is a Brain Tumor? A brain tumor, like other tumors, is a collection of cells that multiply at a rapid rate. The tumor may cause damage by pressing on or spreading into healthy parts of the brain and interfering with function. Brain tumors can be benign or malignant. They can develop outside or inside the brain. A benign tumor is noncancerous but not necessarily harmless. Benign tumors tend to grow slowly. Symptoms may not appear for a long time. These tumors are often detected incidentally, or by accident. For example, a benign tumor may be discovered when a brain scan is performed because of a headache or after a car accident. A benign tumor usually has distinct borders and is less likely to cause damage to surrounding tissue. Malignant tumors are cancerous. Malignant tumors tend to grow aggressively and spread to surrounding tissues. Despite treatment, they may recur either in the same place or in another location. A malignant tumor, if left untreated, can ultimately lead to death. Malignant brain tumors are among the most difficult types of cancer to fight. Malignant brain tumors are classified as either primary or secondary. A primary tumor means the cancerous cells start in the brain. In a secondary—or metastatic—tumor, the cancerous cells start elsewhere in the body. They then spread through the bloodstream to the brain. This process is known as metastasis. More than 120 different types of brain tumors have been identified. What Causes Brain Tumors? When diagnosed with a brain tumor, a person might wonder, why me? Unfortunately, the current understanding of the causes and possible risk factors for brain tumors is limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Tumor Information
    Tumor Information Bone Tumors Soft Tissue Tumors Bone Tumors Bone tumors are a rare cause of musculoskeletal pain but should always be considered in the patient with otherwise unexplained pain. Most bone tumors present with pain and/or a mass. Care must be taken to ensure the correct diagnosis is made, and early consultation with an orthopaedic oncologist is advised to avoid potential complications. In general, these tumors are best treated at a referral practice that specializes in bone tumors. Benign Presenting symptoms Benign bone tumors can have a wide variety of presenting symptoms; in general, benign bone tumors present with pain. Tumors can occur in any bone, and can occur in all age groups. In general, these tumors are a rare cause of musculoskeletal pain, but should be considered when the diagnosis is in question. Often, benign tumors are found incidentally when patients are imaged for other reasons (i.e., a football player hurts his knee and gets an X- ray to rule out fracture; a suspicious tumor is seen). These are usually benign tumors, but need to be carefully evaluated by an orthopaedic tumor specialist. Diagnostic Imaging Imaging is necessary to diagnose a bone tumor. Often, multiple tests are ordered, but must be evaluated carefully by an orthopaedic tumor specialist to make sure that the most accurate diagnosis is rendered. X-Ray Usually done in the office, this is the most basic imaging test. Plain X- rays can provide essential diagnostic information, and must be of high quality. It is not uncommon to have to repeat these in order to make sure a high quality digital image is obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • BENIGN TUMORS of the STOMACH Benign Tumors of The
    BENIGN TUMORS OF THE STOMACH JAMES F. MINNES, M.D., AND CHARLES F. GESCHICKTER, M.D. (From the Surgical Pathological Laboratory, Department oj Surgery Johns Hopkins Hospital) Benign tumors of the stomach, though of more infrequent occurrence than malignant growths of that organ, are sufficiently common to warrant atten­ tion. In recent years an extensive literature has accumulated on their inci­ dence, pathological and clinical features, and roentgen diagnosis. They are frequently confused clinically with malignant and inflammatory lesions, and may give rise to complications which demand immediate surgical intervention. It is the purpose of this paper to review briefly the literature and to present the clinical and pathological features of 50 benign tumors of the stomach recorded in the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1889 to the present day. TYPES AND INCIDENCE Benign tumors may arise from any of the several coats of the stomach: the mucosa, submucosa, muscularis, or serosa. According to the tissue of origin they may be divided into two groups: epithelial and mesenchymal. Among the epithelial tumors are adenomas, adenopapillomas, adenomyomas, and fibro-adenomyomas. Chief among the mesenchymal tumors are the leio­ myomas, fibromas, lipomas, neurofibromas, and the rare angiomas and osteo­ mas. Finally there is a group of lesions which are not truly neoplastic but are usually included with tumors. These include cysts-simple blood or lymph cysts, dermoid and echinococcus cysts-and rarely embryonic rests of the pancreas. The absolute incidence of these benign tumors, as well as their relative frequency as compared with malignant gastric tumors, is difficult to determine. Eusterman and Senty reported a series of 27 benign tumors, which represented 1.3 per cent of all gastric neoplasms operated on at the Mayo Clinic between 1907 and 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
    EPA/630/P-03/001B March 2005 Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Forum U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC DISCLAIMER Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1-1 1.1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE GUIDELINES ........................ 1-1 1.2. ORGANIZATION AND APPLICATION OF THE GUIDELINES ........... 1-3 1.2.1. Organization .............................................. 1-3 1.2.2. Application ............................................... 1-5 1.3. KEY FEATURES OF THE CANCER GUIDELINES ..................... 1-7 1.3.1. Critical Analysis of Available Information as the Starting Point for Evaluation ............................................... 1-7 1.3.2. Mode of Action ........................................... 1-10 1.3.3. Weight of Evidence Narrative ............................... 1-11 1.3.4. Dose-response Assessment .................................. 1-12 1.3.5. Susceptible Populations and Lifestages ........................ 1-13 1.3.6. Evaluating Risks from Childhood Exposures .................... 1-15 1.3.7. Emphasis on Characterization ............................... 1-21 2. HAZARD ASSESSMENT .................................................. 2-1 2.1. OVERVIEW OF HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION . 2-1 2.1.1. Analyses of Data ........................................... 2-1 2.1.2. Presentation of Results ...................................... 2-1 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Hamartoma of the Breast: Report of a Case and Review of the Current Literature
    Medical Journal of the Volume 14 Islamic Republic of Iran Number 2 Summer 1379 August 2000 GIANT HAMARTOMA OF THE BREAST: REPORT OF A CASE AND REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LITERATURE D. FARROKH, M.D. rl'om the Department 0/ Radiology, Imam Reza Medical Center, Mashhad University 0/ Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Islamic Republic o/Iran. ABSTRACT Hamartoma of the breast is a rare benign breast lesion which is unfamiliar to most clinicians, although the mammographic features are usually characteristic. Hamartomas are composed of ducts, lobules, fat and fibrous tissue. These benign lesions are likely to be increasingly diagnosed because of routine screening and hence clinical awareness is paramount to prevent these lesions from being over­ treated. A patient who presented with a soft mobile breast lump which was later diagnosed to be a giant breast hamartoma is presented along with a brief review of the current literature. MJIRI, Vol. 14, No.2, 187-189, 2000. INTRODUCTION tency and there was no nipple or skin abnormality. Ultrasonography didn't show any discrete mass lesion, Breast hamartomas are relatively rare benign tumor-like although the mass was completely palpable. So a mammo­ lesions which result more frombreast dysgenesis than from gram was performed which demonstrated a large well-de­ a tumoral process. Histologically, they are composed of fi­ fined mass occupying almost one-quadrant of the breast. brous tissue, fat, lobules and ducts. The mass was confined by a thin capsule, and appeared to Previous mammographic reports have characterized contain fat and mUltiple small soft tissue densities-the typi­ these lesions as well-delineated masses composed of cal radiographic appearance of a breast hamartoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Background Cancer
    Teacher Background Cancer Note: The Teacher Background Section is meant to provide information for the teacher about the topic and is tied very closely to the PowerPoint slide show. For greater understanding, the teacher may want to play the slide show as he/she reads the background section. For the students, the slide show can be used in its entirety or can be edited as necessary for a given class. What is Cancer? The term cancer was coined by the Greek physician, Hippocrates (460 – 370 BC) from the Greek word karkinos (carcinos) meaning crab which he used to describe the fingerlike projections of tumors. The Roman physician Celsus (50 – 28 BC) translated karkinos, the Greek word for crab, into cancer, the Latin word for crab. Roman physician Galen (130 – 200 AD) used the word oncos (Greek for swelling) to describe tumors. Tumors have been seen in Egyptian mummies with growths suggestive of bone tumors and described in hieroglyphics as far back as 3000 BC when 8 cases of breast tumors or ulcers were reported along with cauterization, using a tool called the fire drill, as the means of destroying the tumor.(1) How Do Normal Cells Differ From Cancer Cells? In normal cells, the rate of new cell growth and old cell death are kept in balance. During mitosis, the cells divide in a controlled fashion. When cells, like skin, age and slough or become damaged, basal cells will replace the cells. To replace the old or damaged cell, the basal cell divides forming two cells – one cell remains as a basal cell and the other becomes part of the tissue (skin in this case) and loses the ability to divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Book 2 - Cancer Characteristics and Selection of Cases
    SEER Program Self InstructionalManualfor Cancer Registrars Cancer Characteristics and Selection of Cases Book Two Third Edition US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL FOR TUMOR REGISTRARS Book 2 - Cancer Characteristics and Selection of Cases Third Edition SEER Program Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute Editor in Chief: Evelyn M. Shambaugh Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute Assisted by Self-Instructional Manual Committee: Constance Percy Cancer Statistics Branch, National Cancer Institute Dr. Robert F. Ryan, Chairman Tulane University School of Medicine Mildred A. Weiss University of California, Los Angeles Ruth N. Pavel Novotny San Francisco, California Mary A. Kruse Bethesda, Maryland Louisiana Regional Medical Program under the direction of C.Dennis Fink, Ph.D., Program Director, HumRRO and Robert F. Ryan, M.D., Technical Advisor, Tulane University. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health NIH Publication No. 95-993 BOOK 2 CANCER CHARACTERISTICS AND SELECTION OF CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS BOOK 2: CANCER CHARACTERISTICS AND SELECTION OF CASES Page Section A--Objectives and Content of Instructional Book 2 ..................... 1 Section B--Benign and Malignant Tumors .................................. 5 Section C--Some Characteristics of Cancer ................................. 19 Section D--Diagnostic Descriptions of Cancer ............................... 33 Section
    [Show full text]