Cutting the Brakes on Ras—Cytoplasmic Gaps As Targets of Inactivation in Cancer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
cancers Review Cutting the Brakes on Ras—Cytoplasmic GAPs as Targets of Inactivation in Cancer Arianna Bellazzo and Licio Collavin * Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 1, 34127 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 September 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020; Published: 21 October 2020 Simple Summary: GTPase-Activating Proteins (RasGAPs) are a group of structurally related proteins with a fundamental role in controlling the activity of Ras in normal and cancer cells. In particular, loss of function of RasGAPs may contribute to aberrant Ras activation in cancer. Here we review the multiple molecular mechanisms and factors that are involved in downregulating RasGAPs expression and functions in cancer. Additionally, we discuss how extracellular stimuli from the tumor microenvironment can control RasGAPs expression and activity in cancer cells and stromal cells, indirectly affecting Ras activation, with implications for cancer development and progression. Abstract: The Ras pathway is frequently deregulated in cancer, actively contributing to tumor development and progression. Oncogenic activation of the Ras pathway is commonly due to point mutation of one of the three Ras genes, which occurs in almost one third of human cancers. In the absence of Ras mutation, the pathway is frequently activated by alternative means, including the loss of function of Ras inhibitors. Among Ras inhibitors, the GTPase-Activating Proteins (RasGAPs) are major players, given their ability to modulate multiple cancer-related pathways. In fact, most RasGAPs also have a multi-domain structure that allows them to act as scaffold or adaptor proteins, affecting additional oncogenic cascades. In cancer cells, various mechanisms can cause the loss of function of Ras inhibitors; here, we review the available evidence of RasGAP inactivation in cancer, with a specific focus on the mechanisms. We also consider extracellular inputs that can affect RasGAP levels and functions, implicating that specific conditions in the tumor microenvironment can foster or counteract Ras signaling through negative or positive modulation of RasGAPs. A better understanding of these conditions might have relevant clinical repercussions, since treatments to restore or enhance the function of RasGAPs in cancer would help circumvent the intrinsic difficulty of directly targeting the Ras protein. Keywords: cell signaling; GTPase-Activating Proteins; tumor suppressor genes; signal transduction; mechanisms of transformation; RAS oncogene 1. Introduction Ras proteins (K-Ras, N-Ras, and H-Ras) are small monomeric GTPases that modulate cell fate by linking receptor activation to intracellular signaling, thereby controlling cell growth, survival, migration, and metabolism [1]. Ras signaling can be initiated by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), and integrin family members (reviewed in [2]). Once activated, Ras proteins trigger a number of pro-oncogenic signaling cascades, including mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt) axis, the NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) transcription factor, and the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) cytoplasmic regulator, supporting evasion of apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal Cancers 2020, 12, 3066; doi:10.3390/cancers12103066 www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Cancers 2020, 12, x 2 of 22 Cancerscytoplasmic2020, 12, regulator, 3066 supporting evasion of apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT),2 of 22as well as metabolic and inflammatory cell reprogramming [2]. Ras proteins can also drive cytoskeletal reorganization and cell motility by stimulating the Rac-Rho and Rac-PAX networks [1,2]. transitionIn cancer (EMT), cells, as wellaberrant as metabolic Ras activation and inflammatory establishes a cellcomplex reprogramming oncogenic [circuit2]. Ras that proteins promotes can alsotumor drive initiation, cytoskeletal growth, reorganization and dissemination, and cell to motilitysuch an extent by stimulating that some the authors Rac-Rho have and proposed Rac-PAX the networksconcept of [1 ,Ras-driven2]. cancer [2]. In a large-scale analysis of the patterns of somatic alterations in cancer,In cancerthe RTK-Ras cells, aberrant axis turned Ras out activation to be the establishes canonical pathway a complex with oncogenic the highest circuit median that promotesfrequency tumorof mutation initiation, [3]. growth,Indeed, andRas dissemination,proteins are frequent to suchly an altered extent thatin tumors, some authors with activating have proposed mutations the conceptidentified of in Ras-driven around one cancer third [ 2of]. all In human a large-scale cancer analysiss [4,5]. Notably, of the patterns in tumors of without somatic RAS alterations mutation, in cancer,multiple the events RTK-Ras can axisphenocopy turned Ras out tohyperactivation be the canonical [6]. pathway For instance, with increased the highest Ras median pathway frequency activity ofis mutationdetected in [3 more]. Indeed, that 50% Ras of proteins breast carcinomas are frequently, although altered the in frequency tumors, with of RAS activating mutation mutations is much identifiedlower in this in around tumor onetype third [4,7,8]. of allSimilarly, human evidence cancers [4 of,5 ].activated Notably, Ras in tumors signaling without is consistently RAS mutation, found multiplein liver cancer events and can phenocopymyeloma, tumors Ras hyperactivation that have a lower [6]. ForRAS instance, mutation increased rate compared Ras pathway to other activity cancers is detected[4,5,9,10]. in more that 50% of breast carcinomas, although the frequency of RAS mutation is much lower in thisLike tumor most type GTPases, [4,7,8]. Similarly,Ras activity evidence is controlled of activated by activators Ras signaling and is inhibitors; consistently therefore, found in in liver the cancerabsence and of myeloma,RAS gene tumors alterations, that have one aimportant lower RAS mechanism mutation rate of Ras compared hyperactivation to other cancers in cancer [4,5 ,9is,10 the]. loss Likeof function most GTPases, of Ras inhibitors. Ras activity Here, is controlled we anal byyze activators one major and class inhibitors; of Ras therefore,inhibitors: in the the GTPase- absence ofActivating RAS gene Proteins alterations, (RasGAPs). one important mechanism of Ras hyperactivation in cancer is the loss of function of Ras inhibitors. Here, we analyze one major class of Ras inhibitors: the GTPase-Activating Proteins2. The Brakes: (RasGAPs). GAPs as Negative Regulators of Ras Activity 2. TheThe Brakes: duration GAPs of asRas Negative activity Regulatorsis tightly contro of Raslled; Activity the conversion from the active GTP-bound form to the inactive GDP-bound state, intrinsic in Ras proteins, is accelerated by members of the GAP The duration of Ras activity is tightly controlled; the conversion from the active GTP-bound form family. Consequently, loss of function of RasGAPs leads to aberrant Ras activation and increases to the inactive GDP-bound state, intrinsic in Ras proteins, is accelerated by members of the GAP family. downstream oncogenic signaling. Currently, there are 14 recognized RasGAP genes in the human Consequently, loss of function of RasGAPs leads to aberrant Ras activation and increases downstream genome; they all contain a GAP domain, but share limited similarity outside this region [11,12]. A set oncogenic signaling. Currently, there are 14 recognized RasGAP genes in the human genome; they all of additional modules is common in RasGAPs, such as Ca2+-binding domains (C2) and contain a GAP domain, but share limited similarity outside this region [11,12]. A set of additional phosphatidylinositol lipid-binding motifs (pleckstrin homology (PH)). The protein architecture and modules is common in RasGAPs, such as Ca2+-binding domains (C2) and phosphatidylinositol specific domains define six RasGAP subfamilies of shared structure and function (Figure 1; for a lipid-binding motifs (pleckstrin homology (PH)). The protein architecture and specific domains define detailed description see [11] and [12]). six RasGAP subfamilies of shared structure and function (Figure1; for a detailed description see [ 11,12]). RASA1 (1047 aa) NF1 (2839 aa) RASA2 (850 aa) RASA3 (834 aa) GAP1 RASA4 (803 aa) RASAL1 (804 aa) SynGAP (1343 aa) DAB2IP (1189 aa) SynGAP RASAL2 (1139 aa) RASAL3 (1011 aa) Figure 1. Domain organization of RasGAPs (Ras GTPase-Activating Proteins). In addition to the GAPFigure domain, 1. Domain different organization RasGAP of proteins RasGAPs are (Ras characterized GTPase-Activating by a specific Proteins). array ofIn functionaladdition to domains, the GAP orchestratingdomain, different their subcellularRasGAP proteins localization are characterize and regulationd by (SH2 a specific= Src homology array of 2functional domain; SH3 domains,= Src homologyorchestrating 3 domain; their subcellular PH = plekstrin localization homology and domain; regulation C2 = (SH2calcium-dependent = Src homology phospholipid-binding 2 domain; SH3 = Src motif;homology CSR = 3Cys domain;/Ser-rich PH region; = plekstrin SEC14 = homologyCRAL-TRIO do lipid-bindingmain; C2 = domain;calcium-dependent CTD = C-terminal phospholipid- domain; Zbinding= Btk-type motif; zinc CSR finger = Cys/Ser-rich motif; PER =region;period-like SEC14 domain; = CRAL-TRIO PR = proline-rich lipid-binding region). domain; Representative CTD = C- proteinsterminal are domain; drawn Z based