DOCSLIB.ORG

Geochronological & Geochemical Constraints from IRAN on The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geochronological & Geochemical Constraints from IRAN on The Geochronological & Geochemical Constraints from IRAN on the magmatic evolution related to Neotethyan subduction and Zagros orogeny A GEOLOGICAL Silk Road Project: 01/08/2011-31/07/2016 Comparative Study of the Tibet/Himalaya vs. Caucasus/Iran Orogens CAUSE CREATE • Outstanding Q: How cont-cont collisional orogeny evolves? New Impossibilities • Major product of the Neotethyan subduction: the Urumieh Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) 5 Stampfli & Borel (2004) ~84 Ma 6 7 Literature age data on Magmatism UDMA: Urumieh- Dokhtar Magmatic Arc SSZ: Sanandaj- Sirjan Structural Zone Age distribution of magmatic rocks in Iran Eocene magmatic flare-ups! Agard et al. (2011) • Arabia-Eurasia convergence at 2-3 cm/yr since 56 Ma • slow, steady rate of Neotethyan n-ward subduction • contrasting with strongly variable rates of the arc magma production (~50-35 Ma “flare-ups”) • subduction rate vs. cont. arc magma production? The enigmatic mid-Tertiary arc volcanic pulse Vincent, Allen et al. (2005, Bull GSA) Arabia-Eurasia collision and the forcing of mid-Cenozoic global cooling Mark B. Allen & Howard A. Armstrong (2008) Eocene Eo-Oligocene magmatic rocks Oligocene Some “Outstanding” Questions: • A “double” magmatic arc? Or, an arc vs. its “backarc”? (semi-)continueous, long-lasting Neotethyan subduction? • Magmatic “flare-up” (only) in the Eocene? • The Neo-Tethyan subduction rate: change or not? • The onset timing of the Arabia-Eurasia collision? [diachronous? e.g., SE-ward younging?] • Slab breakoff: when? a starting “point”? propagating? • When and how the Turk-Iranian plateau was uplifted? • Comparable with the Tibet-Himalaya orogen? bThe time vs. space evolution of the pre- to post- magmatism in the Caucasus-Turk-Iran orogenic belt [esp. system./precise age dating + geochemistry] Iranian Magmatic Zircons (<600 Ma) Age results in the UDMA and SSZ Literature data from the SSZ: ca. 175-150 Ma & ca. 55-36 Ma UDMA: (1) northwest (2) central (3) southeast segments Northwestern UDMA: zircon U-Pb age results 53-27 Ma and <11 Ma (post-collisional magmatism) 08-IR-ZS-87: Abundant Inh.Zc at ~233 Ma <11 Ma Post-collisional magmatism Armenia: 4-3 Ma zircon U-Pb and <2 Ma whole-rock Ar-Ar ages (Lin, thesis, 2011) Sabalan: 0.4 Ma Kirovakan (Armenia) Sahand : 7-4 Ma 4.4 Ma adakite Saray: 11 Ma high-K basalts Saray (Urumieh) Sabalan 11 Ma 0.4 Ma basalt adakite Central UDMA: zircon U-Pb age results ~166 Ma (Shir-Kuh pluton) and 57-16 Ma 08-IR-ZS-30: Abundant Inh.Zc at ~278 Ma Southeastern UDMA: zircon U-Pb age results 81-72 Ma (granitoids) and 45-5.4 Ma Mesozoic Granitoids (Late Jurassic & Late Cretaceous) Mesozoic Granitoids (Late Jurassic & Late Cretaceous) Mesozoic Granitoids (Late Jurassic & Late Cretaceous) Eocene Oligocene Miocene Λ Major Remarks: • The magmatic “flare- ups”: “longer-lasting” in the Eocene-Oligocene (ca. 55-25 Ma) • Southeastward younging of magma termination: ~16 Ma in central UDMA ~5-6 Ma in southeast UDMA• Magmatic gaps? • Major age peaks in SSZ: ~165 Ma; ~55-36 Ma Λ Chiu (2012 thesis, in ) 26.5 Ma 21-16 Ma Southeastward 13-7 Ma termination of the precollisional, “arc” magmatism 35 16 mm/yr Iran 18 mm/yr 22 mm/yr Allen (2004) Post-collisional (mid-Miocene to Quaternary) Lut Sistan ophiolite Zarrinkoub et al. (in revision) ~110 Ma ~86-70 Ma ~56-54 Ma ~45-25 Ma ~45-25 Ma Zarrinkoub et al. (in prep.) 14.3-1.6 Ma 45 ? ? McCall (1997, JAES) 4646 ? ? 4747 McCall (1997) The geotectonic history of Makran Active (<1 Ma) Volcanoes In IRAN 48 5050 5151 Coexistence of 4 types of mid-Miocene magmatism in IRAN Absarokites (~11 Ma) Adakites (~6 Ma to date) Intraplate AB Postcollisional (~14-1.6 Ma) Extensional Calc-alk. lavas (~13-5.4 Ma) Neotethyan Calc-alk. lavas Subduction (~19-0.8 Ma) (ending) start of Makran Subduction?52 Slab breakoff Dilek (2009)5353 Al-Lazki et al. (2004, GJI) 1. Pn Velocity 2. Sn Attenuation 5454 Sistan ophiolite Thank You !.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review and Updated Checklist of Freshwater Fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, Distribution and Conservation Status
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2017), 4(Suppl. 1): 1–114 Received: October 18, 2016 © 2017 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: February 30, 2017 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.7508/iji.2017 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Hamidreza MEHRABAN1, Keivan ABBASI2, Yazdan KEIVANY3, Brian W. COAD4 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center. Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Anzali, Iran 3Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran 4Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6P4 Canada *Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to reviews and summarize the results of the systematic and zoogeographical research on the Iranian inland ichthyofauna that has been carried out for more than 200 years. Since the work of J.J. Heckel (1846-1849), the number of valid species has increased significantly and the systematic status of many of the species has changed, and reorganization and updating of the published information has become essential. Here we take the opportunity to provide a new and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran based on literature and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history and new fish collections. This article lists 288 species in 107 genera, 28 families, 22 orders and 3 classes reported from different Iranian basins. However, presence of 23 reported species in Iranian waters needs confirmation by specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • And “Climate”. Qarah Dagh in Khorasan Ostan on the East of Iran 1
    IRAN STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 1397 1. LAND AND CLIMATE Introduction T he statistical information that appeared in this of Tehran and south of Mazandaran and Gilan chapter includes “geographical characteristics and Ostans, Ala Dagh, Binalud, Hezar Masjed and administrative divisions” ,and “climate”. Qarah Dagh in Khorasan Ostan on the east of Iran 1. Geographical characteristics and aministrative and joins Hindu Kush mountains in Afghanistan. divisions The mountain ranges in the west, which have Iran comprises a land area of over 1.6 million extended from Ararat mountain to the north west square kilometers. It lies down on the southern half and the south east of the country, cover Sari Dash, of the northern temperate zone, between latitudes Chehel Cheshmeh, Panjeh Ali, Alvand, Bakhtiyari 25º 04' and 39º 46' north, and longitudes 44º 02' and mountains, Pish Kuh, Posht Kuh, Oshtoran Kuh and 63º 19' east. The land’s average height is over 1200 Zard Kuh which totally form Zagros ranges. The meters above seas level. The lowest place, located highest peak of this range is “Dena” with a 4409 m in Chaleh-ye-Loot, is only 56 meters high, while the height. highest point, Damavand peak in Alborz The southern mountain range stretches from Mountains, rises as high as 5610 meters. The land Khouzestan Ostan to Sistan & Baluchestan Ostan height at the southern coastal strip of the Caspian and joins Soleyman Mountains in Pakistan. The Sea is 28 meters lower than the open seas. mountain range includes Sepidar, Meymand, Iran is bounded by Turkmenistan, the Caspian Sea, Bashagard and Bam Posht Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Climate
    IRAN STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 1391 1. LAND AND CLIMATE Introduction Gilan Ostans, Ala Dagh, Binalud, Hezar Masjed he statistical information appeared in this and Qarah Dagh in Khorasan Ostanon the east of chapter includes the Geographical Iran. characteristics and administrative divisions, and The mountain ranges in the west, which have Climate. extended from Ararat Mountain to the north 1. Geographical characteristics and west and the south east of the country, cover Sari administrative divisions Dash, Chehel Cheshmeh, Panjeh Ali, Alvand, Iran comprises a land area of over 1.6 million Bakhtiyari mountains, Pish Kuh, Posht Kuh, square kilometers. It lies down on the southern Oshtoran Kuh and Zard Kuh and form Zagros half of the northern temperate zone, between ranges .The highest peak of this range is “Dena” latitudes 25º 00' and 39º 47' north, and with a 4409 m height. longitudes 44º 02' and 63º 20' east. The land’s . average height is over 1200 meters. The lowest Southern mountain range stretches from place, located in Chaleh-ye-Loot, is only 56 Khouzestan province to Sistan & Baluchestan meters high, while the highest point, Damavand province and joins Soleyman Mountains in peak in Alborz Mountains, rises as high as 5610 Pakistan. The mountain range includes Sepidar, meters. The land height at the southern coastal Meymand, Bashagard and Bam Posht mountains. strip of the Caspian Sea is 28 meters lower than Central and eastern mountains mainly comprise the open seas. Karkas, Shir Kuh, Kuh Banan, Jebal Barez, Iran is bounded by Turkmenistan, Caspian Sea, Hezar,Bazman and Taftan mountains, the highest Azerbaijan, and Armenia on the north, of which is Hezar mountain with a 4465 m Afghanistan and Pakistan on the east, Oman Sea height.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris Hawks Optimization: a Novel Swarm Intelligence Technique for Spatial Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility
    Article Harris Hawks Optimization: A Novel Swarm Intelligence Technique for Spatial Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Dieu Tien Bui 1, Hossein Moayedi 2,3,*, Bahareh Kalantar 4, Abdolreza Osouli 5, Mesut Gör 6, Biswajeet Pradhan 7,8, Hoang Nguyen 9,10 and Ahmad Safuan A Rashid 11 1 Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam 2 Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 3 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 4 RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Goal-Oriented Technology Research Group, Disaster Resilience Science Team, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan 5 Civil Engineering Department, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA 6 Department of Civil Engineering, Division of Geotechnical Engineering, Firat University, Elâzığ 23119, Turkey 7 Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia 8 Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Choongmu-gwan, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea 9 Department of Surface Mining, Hanoi University of Mining land Geology, 18 Vien Street, Duc Thang Ward, Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Vietnam 10 Center for Mining, Electro-Mechanical Research, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, 18 Vien Street, Duc Thang Ward, Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Vietnam 11 Centre of Tropical Geoengineering (Geotropik), School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia * Correspondence: [email protected] ; Tel.: +009-891-7711-3193 Received: 5 July 2019; Accepted: 15 August 2019; Published: 17 August 2019 Abstract: In this research, the novel metaheuristic algorithm Harris hawks optimization (HHO) is applied to landslide susceptibility analysis in Western Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Kolah-Ghazi Granitoids of Iran
    Chemie der Erde 77 (2017) 281–302 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemie der Erde j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.de/chemer Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Kolah-Ghazi granitoids of Iran: Insights into the Jurassic Sanandaj-Sirjan magmatic arc a a,∗ b c Marzieh Bayati , Dariush Esmaeily , Reza Maghdour-Mashhour , Xian-Hua Li , d Robert J. Stern a Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran 14155-64155, Iran b School of Geosciences, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa c State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China d Geosciences Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083-0688, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Kolah-Ghazi granitoid (KGG), situated in the southern part of the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone (SNSZ), Iran, is a Received 17 January 2017 peraluminous, high K calc-alkaline, cordierite-bearing S-type body that is mainly composed of monzo- Accepted 27 February 2017 granite, granodorite and syenogranite. Zircon U–Pb ages indicate that the crystallization of the main body Editorial handling - Hadi Shafaii Moghadam occurred from 175 Ma to 167 Ma. Two kinds of xenoliths are found in KKG rocks: (i) xenoliths of partially melted pelites including cordierite xenocrysts and aluminoslicates, and (ii) mafic microgranular enclaves Keywords: that reflect the input of mantle-derived mafic magmas. Field observations and geochemical data of KGG Zircon U–Pb dating rocks are consistent with their derivation from a multiple sources including melts of metasediments Jurassic magmatism and mantle-derived melts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Geology of Iran Mineral Deposits and Natural Resources Springer Geology
    Springer Geology Mansour Ghorbani The Economic Geology of Iran Mineral Deposits and Natural Resources Springer Geology For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/10172 Mansour Ghorbani The Economic Geology of Iran Mineral Deposits and Natural Resources Mansour Ghorbani Faculty of Geoscience Shahid Beheshti University Tehran , Iran ISBN 978-94-007-5624-3 ISBN 978-94-007-5625-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5625-0 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012951116 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Climate
    IRAN STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 1389 1. LAND AND CLIMATE Introduction and Qarah Dagh in Khorasan Ostan on the east he statistical information appeared in this of Iran. chapter is presented in three sections: The mountain ranges in the west, which have Geographical characteristics and administrative extended from Ararat Mountain to the north divisions, Climate, and Environment. west and the south east of the country, cover 1.Geographical characteristics and Sari Dash, Chehel Cheshmeh, Panjeh Ali, administrative divisions Alvand, Bakhtiyari mountains, Pish Kuh, Posht Iran comprises a land area of over 1.6 million Kuh, Oshtoran Kuh and Zard Kuh and form square kilometers. It lies down the northern Zagros ranges . The highest peak of this range is temperate zone, between latitudes 25º 00' and “Dena” with a 4409 m height. 39º 47' north, and longitudes 44º 02' and 63º 20' Southern mountain range stretches from east. The land’s average height is over 1200 Khouzestan province to Sistan & Baluchestan meters. The lowest place, located in Chaleh-ye- province and joins Soleyman Mountains in Loot, is only 56 meters high, while the highest Pakistan. The mountain range includes Sepidar, point, Damavand peak in Alborz Mountains, Meymand, Bashagard and Bam Posht mountains. rises as high as 5610 meters. The land height at Central and eastern mountains mainly comprise the southern coastal strip of the Caspian Sea is Karkas, Shir Kuh, Kuh Banan, Jebal Barez, 28 meters lower than the open seas. Hezar, Bazman and Taftan mountains, the Iran is bounded by Turkmenistan, Caspian highest of which is Hezar Mountain with a 4465 Sea, Azerbaijan, and Armenia to the north, m height.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Climate
    IRAN STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 1394 1. LAND AND CLIMATE Introduction and Qarah Dagh in Khorasan Ostan on the east The statistical information appeared in this of Iran. chapter includes “geographical characteristics The mountain ranges in the west, which have and administrative divisions” ,and “climate”. extended from Ararat mountain to the north west 1. Geographical characteristics and and the south east of the country, cover Sari administrative divisions Dash, Chehel Cheshmeh, Panjeh Ali, Alvand, Iran comprises a land area of over 1.6 million Bakhtiyari mountains, Pish Kuh, Posht Kuh, square kilometers. It lies down on the southern Oshtoran Kuh and Zard Kuh which totally form half of the northern temperate zone, between Zagros ranges.The highest peak of this range is latitudes 25º 04' and 39º 46' north, and “Dena” with a 4409 m height. longitudes 44º 02' and 63º 19' east. The land’s Southern mountain range stretches from average height is over 1200 meters above seas Khouzestan Ostan to Sistan & Baluchestan level. The lowest place, located in Chaleh-ye- Ostan and joins Soleyman mountains in Loot, is only 56 meters high, while the highest Pakistan. The mountain range includes Sepidar, point, Damavand peak in Alborz Mountains, Meymand, Bashagard and Bam Posht mountains. rises as high as 5610 meters. The land height at Central and eastern mountains mainly comprise the southern coastal strip of the Caspian Sea is Karkas, Shir Kuh, Kuh Banan, Jebal Barez, 28 meters lower than the open seas. Hezar, Bazman and Taftan mountains, the Iran is bounded by Turkmenistan, Caspian Sea, highest of which is Hezar mountain with a 4465 Republic of Azerbaijan, and Armenia on the m height.
    [Show full text]
  • Zircon U–Pb Age Constraints from Iran on the Magmatic Evolution Related to Neotethyan Subduction and Zagros Orogeny
    Lithos 162–163 (2013) 70–87 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Lithos journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Zircon U–Pb age constraints from Iran on the magmatic evolution related to Neotethyan subduction and Zagros orogeny Han-Yi Chiu a, Sun-Lin Chung a,⁎, Mohammad Hossein Zarrinkoub b, Seyyed Saeid Mohammadi b, Mohammad Mahdi Khatib b, Yoshiyuki Iizuka c a Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan b Department of Geology, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran c Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan article info abstract Article history: This study reports zircon LA-ICPMS U–Pb ages of 50 igneous rock samples from the Urumieh–Dokhtar mag- Received 12 July 2012 matic arc (UDMA) and Sanandaj–Sirjan structural zone (SSZ) in Iran. These results, together with literatures Accepted 11 January 2013 and our unpublished age data, better delineate the magmatic evolution related to the Neotethyan subduction Available online 20 January 2013 and subsequent Zagros orogeny that resulted from the Arabia–Eurasia collision. Subduction-related mag- matism was active during Jurassic time, as evidenced by the presence of widespread I-type granitoids from Keywords: – Zircon U–Pb age the Middle to Late Jurassic (176 144 Ma) in the SSZ. After a protracted magmatic quiescence in the Early Cre- UDMA taceous, igneous activity renewed inland in the UDMA from which we identify Late Cretaceous granitoids SSZ (81–72 Ma) in Jiroft and Bazman areas, the southeastern segment of the UDMA. The UDMA volcanism was Iran most active and widespread during the Eocene and Oligocene (55–25 Ma), much longer lasting than previ- Neotethyan subduction ously thought as just an Eocene pulse.
    [Show full text]
  • Zircon U-Pb Geochronology and Emplacement History of Intrusive Rocks in the Ardestan Section, Central Iran
    Geologica Acta, Vol.15, Nº 1, March 2017, 25-36, I-X DOI: 10.1344/GeologicaActa2017.15.1.3 F. Sarjoughian, A. Kananian, 2017 CC BY-SA Zircon U-Pb geochronology and emplacement history of intrusive rocks in the Ardestan section, central Iran F. SARJOUGHIAN1 A. KANANIAN2 1Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Kurdistan Sanandaj, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 00989131005827, Fax: 00988736624133 2School of Geology, College of Science, University of Tehran Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] ABS TRACT The Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) is part of the Alpine–Himalayan orogenic belt and interpreted to be a subduction-related Andean-type magmatic arc. Along this belt, Eocene volcanics and some gabbroic to granitic bodies crop out. The main rock types of the studied intrusion are granite, granodiorite, and diorite. They have geochemical features typical of magnesian, calc-alkaline, metaluminous to slightly peraluminous granites and I-type intrusive rock that have a strong enrichment in Large-Ion Lithophile (LIL) elements (e.g. Rb, Ba, Sr), and a depletion in High Field Strength (HFS) elements (e.g. Nb, Ti, P), typical of subduction-related magmas. Zircon U-Pb dating was applied to determine the emplacement ages of the different intrusions in the Ardestan area. Among them the Kuh-e Dom diorite is 53.9±0.4Ma old; the Kuh-e Dom granodiorite is 51.10±0.4Ma old; the Mehrabad granodiorite is 36.8±0.5Ma old, the Nasrand granodiorite is 36.5±0.5Ma old, the Zafarghand granodiorite is 24.6±1.0Ma old, and the Feshark granodiorite is 20.5±0.8Ma old.
    [Show full text]
  • Zarasvandi Et Al..Fm
    International Geology Review, Vol. 47, 2005, p. 620–646. Copyright © 2005 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved. Geology of the Darreh-Zerreshk and Ali-Abad Porphyry Copper Deposits, Central Iran A. ZARASVANDI, S. LIAGHAT, Department of Earth Sciences, Shiraz University, P.O. Box 1330, Shiraz, Iran AND M. ZENTILLI1 Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1 Abstract This paper describes the petrology, mineralogy, alteration, structural characteristics, and geolog- ical evolution of the Darreh-Zerreshk and Ali-Abad copper deposits within the central Iranian volcano-plutonic belt, Yazd Province, central Iran. Intrusions in this area, a result of subduction magmatism, range in composition from quartzmonzodiorite to granite, yet copper-molybdenum porphyry–type mineralization is restricted to quartzmonzodioritic to granodioritic plutons. The min- eralizing intrusions cut Cretaceous and Eocene strata, and have been dated as Oligocene–Miocene. Strong negative anomalies for Nb, Ta, P, and Ti and enrichment in the LREE, LILE, Ba, Rb, Sr, and Pb for the mineralizing igneous rocks suggest they are of I type and have magmatic arc affinity. REE patterns, major-, and trace-element data suggest that these rocks were derived from partial melting of enriched upper mantle, modified by variable crustal contamination. Hornblende fractionation was an important control on the evolution of copper-bearing plutonic rocks. Structural observations suggest that these deposits were emplaced in tensional pull-apart domains formed between two secondary dextral strike-slip faults of the regional Dehshir-Baft shear system. Rapid exhumation of the porphyry copper systems allowed for the development of only minor supergene enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest, Volume 18 (1988)
    Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest, Volume 18 (1988) Item Type text; Proceedings Publisher Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Journal Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest Rights Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. Download date 25/09/2021 08:00:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/296417 VOLUME 18 HYDROLOGY and WATER RESOURCES inARIZO \A and the SOUTHWEST Proceedings of the 1988 Meetings of the Arizona Section American Water Resources Association and the Hydrology Section Arizona- Nevada Academy of Science April 16, 1988, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Vo I une 18 Hydrology and Water Resources In Arizona and the Southwest Proceedings of the 1988 Meetings of the Arizona Section -- American Water Resources Association and the Hydrology Section -- Arizona- Nevada Academy of Science April 16, 1988 University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE introduction v Ordering Information for AWRA Publications vii A Model of Snowpack Dynamics in Forest Openings Peter F. Ffolliott, D. Phillip Guertin and O. Rasmussen 1 Factors Affecting Seasonal and Annual Precipitation in Arizona Arnon Karniell and Herbert B. Osborn 7 Mapping the Areal Precipitation over Arizona Using Kriging Technique Arnon Karniell 19 Initial Survival and Growth of Tree Seedlings in a Water Harvesting Agrlsystem Peter F. Ffolliott 43 Mapping and Characterization of the Solis on the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center Donald F. Post, Chris Mack, Philip D. Camp and Ahmed S. Suliman. 49 Relationship Between Soll Spectral Properties and Sand, Silt, and Clay Content of the Soils on the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center Ahmed S.
    [Show full text]