DOCSLIB.ORG

A Program of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Authority Minutes of Meeting #8/15 September 25, 2015 Authority Meeting #8/15 was held at TRCA Head Office, on Friday, September 25, 2015. The Chair Maria Augimeri, called the meeting to order at 9:43 a.m. PRESENT Paul Ainslie Member Maria Augimeri Chair Vincent Crisanti Member Glenn De Baeremaeker Member Jennifer Drake Member Rob Ford Member Jack Heath Member Jennifer Innis Member Maria Kelleher Member Matt Mahoney Member Giorgio Mammoliti Member Glenn Mason Member Mike Mattos Member Jennifer McKelvie Member Ron Moeser Member Linda Pabst Member Anthony Perruzza Member John Sprovieri Member ABSENT Jack Ballinger Member David Barrow Member Michael Di Biase Vice Chair Justin Di Ciano Member Chris Fonseca Member Rodney Hoinkes Member Colleen Jordan Member Jennifer O’Connell Member Gino Rosati Member Jim Tovey Member RES.#A152/15 - MINUTES Moved by: Ron Moeser Seconded by: Maria Kelleher THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/15, held on July 24, 2015, be approved. CARRIED ______________________________ 357 DELEGATIONS (a) A delegation by Sandra Smithson, daughter of resident of 197 Greyabbey Trail, in regard to 8.2 - 220 Greyabbey Trail. RES.#A153/15 - DELEGATIONS Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker Seconded by: Jack Heath THAT above-noted delegation (a) be received. CARRIED ______________________________ PRESENTATIONS (a) A presentation by Chris Bagley, General Manager, Black Creek Pioneer Village, TRCA, in regard to item 7.1 - Black Creek Pioneer Village. (b) A presentation by Brian Denney, CEO, TRCA, in regard to item 7.11 - Review of the Conservation Authorities Act. (c) A video presentation of the Girls Can Too Program at Bolton Camp. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/life-video/video-girls-can-too- construction/article26126709/#video0id26126709 RES.#A154/15 - PRESENTATIONS Moved by: Ron Moeser Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker THAT above-noted presentation (a) be deferred to Authority Meeting #9/15, scheduled to be held on October 30, 2015. CARRIED RES.#A155/15 - PRESENTATIONS Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Ron Moeser THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received. CARRIED RES.#A156/15 - PRESENTATIONS Moved by: Jennifer Innis Seconded by: Linda Pabst THAT above-noted presentation (c) be received. CARRIED ______________________________ 358 CORRESPONDENCE (a) An email dated September 12, 2015 Dana and Jiri Kopka, 201 Greyabbey Raod, Toronto at in regard to item 8.2 - 220 Greyabbey Trail. (b) A letter dated September 20, 2015 from Roy Wright, resident, 471 Guildwood Parkway, Scarborough, in regard to item 8.2 - 220 Greyabbey Trail. (c) An email dated September 20, 2015 from Christine Vachon & Elizabeth Byrnes, residents, 203 Greyabbey Trail, Scarborough in regard to item 8.2 - 220 Greyabbey Trail. RES.#A157/15 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker Seconded by: Jack Heath THAT above-noted correspondence (a) – (c) be received. CARRIED ______________________________ 359 "Dana Kopka" To <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > cc 09/12/2015 04:04 PM bcc Subject Notice of Violation #V 2814 Dear Mr. Ainsley and TRCA staff, We would like to acknowledge that we have received your invitation to the upcoming TRCA meeting th regarding Notice of Violation # V 2814 of 220 Greyabbey Trail on September 25 . Regrettably, we are not able to attend the meeting at the scheduled time to once again voice our concerns, but felt it prudent to at least re‐express our immense concern in a letter to you, in hope that you will present it on our behalf during the meeting. Although we are pleased that you have taken interest in the issue, and continue to investigate potential resolutions, we feel that the amount of time that has already lapsed since the mountain of dirt was carved out of the Scarborough bluffs and deposited directly in front of our house, is beyond unacceptable. The respective agencies involved in approving this project have thoroughly failed in actually exploring and understanding the project’s impact and magnitude prior to approving it. The individuals that should have been overseeing this project failed to do so, as the project was allowed to continue until irreparable damage has been caused. As a result, environmental harm has been caused, important habitats destroyed, community appeal has been damaged, our property values have been decreased, our sanctity has been violated and our peace has been disturbed. All this has been going on for two years with empty promises of a soon‐to‐come resolution that never appears to make it out of the committee’s meeting room. We are frustrated that this project was allowed to happen, we are furious that (to our knowledge) there have been no consequences for the parties involved in this epic failure, and that no reprieve or answers have been provided to the residents of our community in two years. At this point, given that the damage has already been done, we only have the following request: Remove the pile of dirt, restore the value of our properties and return peace to our community. Sincerely, Dana & Jiri Kopka 201 Greyabbey Trail Scarborough See below one of our previous emails: From: Dana Kopka Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:17 PM To: [email protected]; planning&[email protected] Subject: Destruction of the Scarborough Bluffs 360 Importance: High Dear Sir/Madam, We are writing to you to request an explanation regarding a construction at 220 Greyabbey Trail in Scarborough. We have raised our concerns with our local MP, Mr. Paul Ainslie and we were advised that you are responsible for permitting the construction and later stopping the project due to owner’s “non- adherence to your guidelines”. Because of that the whole neighborhood has been affected by this unsightly construction site for over a year. There sits an approximately 10 m high pile of dirt directly across the street from some houses which markedly decreases the value of our properties by thousands of dollars, not to mention the ugly obstructed view and ever-present dust. How does this agree with your policy :“our goal is to support a greener, cleaner, healthier place to live?” Please explain, how is it even possible, that you gave the permission for the destruction of a sizable part of the Scarborough Bluffs which are considered an ecological treasure. Did you really think that the Bluff can be remodelled to its original shape after agreeing to a construction road to be built from its top ? FYI this has caused several months of very busy heavy machinery traffic on a street which had “No entrance to trucks” sign due to weight limits. It is especially difficult to understand because there was already an access road built through the Guildwood Park to enable the Bluff reinforcement along the shore. It is even more confusing now in the light of the proposal of developing a “Waterfront Park along the Bluffs” in the very same area. Obviously your assessment and permit seem very short sighted. We understand that you have stopped the work due to “a violation of the strict guidelines for the environmentally sensitive area” following Ms. Connie Pinto’s inspection, however we believe that much greater violation was done by issuing the permit. We are asking that you at least move quickly on the matter of finishing this shameful project as soon as possible in keeping with your vision “ for a new kind of community, The Living City, where human settlement can flourish forever as part of nature's beauty and diversity.” Please update us on the progress, time-line and final plans for this construction. Thank you. Dana and Jiri Kopka 201 Greyabbey Trail Scarborough "*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE* Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it permanently from your computer system. Thank you." 361 TRCA Board Members: September 20, 2015 Re: Violation #V2814 – 220 Greyabbey Trail, Scarborough My name is Roy Wright, I live at 471 Guildwood Parkway located six houses west of 220 Greyabbey Trail. I am writing this deputation on behalf of myself and 12 other Greyabbey neighbours (names and addresses available upon request). The Greyabbey community at large all agree that the 220 Greyabbey home situated on a large lakefront property has been a proud and positive asset to the whole neighbourhood. For the past dozen years, the grounds have been professionally landscaped with a full time gardener and other employees. During the Christmas season, this property has become somewhat of a celebrity and a tourist attraction. The spectacular Christmas light show draws admirers both locally and visitors from out of town. We are urging TRCA to help the Greyabbey property owner (Ms. Greening) to both save her substantial home from the erosion problem and to bring her unique lakeview property back to its former glory as soon as possible. I fully understand Ms. Greening’s worrisome erosion urgency and her self help effort to save the eroding tableland as others have successfully been allowed to do. The City of Toronto, The Toronto Hunt (golf course) and myself procured TRCA permits to construct the previously accepted Geotech approved method of top filling that Ms. Greening was seeking (and was denied thus creating this violation problem). Note 1. The 100% successful result of capping the cliff face with solid rubble fill has enabled TRCA approval for a new 2015 building permit for a 4,300 square foot house to be built 60 feet from the edge of the cliff at 473 Guildwood Parkway.
Recommended publications
  • We Need Your Memberships. Please Join CCRA Today! Organization

    We Need Your Memberships. Please Join CCRA Today! Organization

    Have a great summer! Voice of the Community since 1949 June 2017 Vol. 02, No 6 The next issue of the Centennial News Centennial News will be out in September. A publication of the Centennial Community and Recreation Association www.ccranews.ca Mowat throws a party for Canada’s Lois and Hal have 150th birthday been members of By Madison Wong n honour of our country’s 150th the CCRA for almost anniversary, Sir Oliver Mowat C.I. threw Canada a celebra- 40 years. You can Ition outdoors in our courtyard on May 10 for students, faculty and join them. community members to enjoy. This year, MECO – Mowat’s environmental club – campaigned to Lois and Hal Stuart sharing their happy stories about living in the Centennial area. Photos: Courtesy Denise Bacon raise money in support of Canadian soldiers and the Highway of Heroes We need your memberships. Please join CCRA today! organization. This initiative was also known as the Toonies for Trees By Denise Bacon is asking for your help to keep it that way. Membership campaign. The money went toward in the association is only $15 per family each year. This supporting the organization as e live in a beautiful part of Toronto here in fee helps to fund community events like Winterfest, the well as for the city to plant a tree the Centennial community. Going for walks Spring Social, Earth Day and the Port Union Waterfront along Highway 401 for every fallen around our quiet neighbourhood, often on Festival. Also, CCRA represents the interests of the Canadian soldier.
  • Agenda Item History - 2013.MM41.25

    Agenda Item History - 2013.MM41.25

    Agenda Item History - 2013.MM41.25 http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.MM... Item Tracking Status City Council adopted this item on November 13, 2013 with amendments. City Council consideration on November 13, 2013 MM41.25 ACTION Amended Ward:All Requesting Mayor Ford to respond to recent events - by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn City Council Decision Caution: This is a preliminary decision. This decision should not be considered final until the meeting is complete and the City Clerk has confirmed the decisions for this meeting. City Council on November 13 and 14, 2013, adopted the following: 1. City Council request Mayor Rob Ford to apologize for misleading the City of Toronto as to the existence of a video in which he appears to be involved in the use of drugs. 2. City Council urge Mayor Rob Ford to co-operate fully with the Toronto Police in their investigation of these matters by meeting with them in order to respond to questions arising from their investigation. 3. City Council request Mayor Rob Ford to apologize for writing a letter of reference for Alexander "Sandro" Lisi, an alleged drug dealer, on City of Toronto Mayor letterhead. 4. City Council request Mayor Ford to answer to Members of Council on the aforementioned subjects directly and not through the media. 5. City Council urge Mayor Rob Ford to take a temporary leave of absence to address his personal issues, then return to lead the City in the capacity for which he was elected. 6. City Council request the Integrity Commissioner to report back to City Council on the concerns raised in Part 1 through 5 above in regard to the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
  • City Hall a TERM in REVIEW

    City Hall a TERM in REVIEW

    City Hall A TERM IN REVIEW August 2018 1 As Toronto City Council has wrapped up its legislative term in anticipation of the upcoming Municipal Election in October, the Municipal Affairs Team at Sussex Strategy Group felt it was timely to reflect on the active 2014 - 2018 Council term. Below are some highlights from over the last four years, as well as some key insights into continued discussions and debates to be expected into the 2018 - 2022 term. Sussex has broken down the accomplishments and memorable moments into general trends of the term’s entirety. 2 Full Speed Ahead PUBLIC TRANSIT & TRANSPORTATION 3 Right out of the gate in early 2015, the by 2031, including approval of a SmartTrack accelerated SmartTrack work plan was concept with six new stations, an Eglinton reviewed and funded to address matters of West LRT, one-stop Scarborough subway project financing, design, service expectations extension, Eglinton East LRT, and a Relief Line. and implementation schedule over the course of the term. This was a key campaign promise of Mayor John Tory and properly aligned with one of the key themes of the term – getting Torontonians moving…out of their cars and onto transit. Getting Torontonians moving on the road safely and out of gridlock was another aspect of the 2014-2018 term. At the onset, Council approved measures to mitigate traffic disruptions. Next, Council focused its attention to speeding on residential streets and in school zones, a result of increased usage of cars trying to bypass congested arterial roads and routes. Staff reported on possible mitigation efforts in 2015.
  • Library Board

    Library Board

    October 9, 2007 Dear Friend of the Toronto Public Library: As you know, the Toronto Public Library Board recently held a series of public meetings to inform the public about our budget situation and to give people an opportunity to ask questions and share their thoughts and opinions. We told people about the difficult decisions the Board faces regarding potential service reductions in 2008 affecting open hours, services and collections. We listened to thoughtful questions and feedback that the Library Board will take into careful consideration as we plan for our 2008 budget. As you heard if you were able to join us for a meeting, there are only two areas that the Library Board can cut from to get the significant reductions that may be required: branch open hours and library materials (that is, the books, CDs, reference materials, etc. that make up our collections). Cuts in both of these areas would negatively impact services and, as we heard, would ultimately hurt the people we serve. Here is just a little of what we’ve heard from those who attended the meetings and/or have filled out our survey and comment forms: • “Education is power. The Toronto Public Library is rich with information from which we all learn. Without it, crime, poverty, and unemployment will rise.” • “Toronto Public Library is one of the very few places in the City where teens are invited to do creative and useful things, free of charge!” • “I am always impressed by the diversity I see in the larger branch I drop into from time to time.
  • Communication from Jennifer Mckelvie, Centennial Community and Recreation Association, Ron Wootton, Coronation Community Associa

    Communication from Jennifer Mckelvie, Centennial Community and Recreation Association, Ron Wootton, Coronation Community Associa

    PW11.4.1 Toronto Public Works and Infrastructure Committee City Hall - 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Sent Via Email: [email protected] February 19th, 2016 Re: AGENDA ITEM PW11.14 - Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant - Biosolids Class Environmental Assessment Dear Members of the Committee, This letter is to indicate that the executive committees of the five Community Associations, located nearest to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant (HCTP), stand in solidarity supporting Alternative 1 (a new fluidized bed incinerator) as the preferred solution for biosolids management. Individual deputations will also be submitted by each association. Our five community associations cover a large portion of the Ward 43 and Ward 44 study area in the Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment. Specifically we represent a contiguous area spanning: Guildwood Village: Approximately 3000 households in the south of Ward 43 from Lake Ontario to Guildwood Parkway and the railway tracks. Coronation Community: Approximately 3000 households in Ward 43/44 from Guildwood Station to Beechgrove (Highland Creek) and the railway tracks to Morningside Park. Centennial Community: Approximately 4,000 households in Ward 44 from Highland Creek to Port Union Road and Lake Ontario to Kingston Road. Highland Creek Community: Approximately 4000 households in Ward 44 from Military Trail and Morningside Ave. in the west to the convergence of Kingston Rd and the 401 in the east. West Rouge Community: Approximately 3000 households in Ward 44 from Port Union Road to Rouge Park and Lake Ontario to the 401. All five residents associations have actively participated in the Environmental and Health Impacts Assessments by attending Public Information Centres (PIC), sharing information in our community newsletters, and attending stakeholder meetings.
  • Urbanvision Urbanvision Endorses David Soknacki for Ward 44 City Councillor

    Urbanvision Urbanvision Endorses David Soknacki for Ward 44 City Councillor

    CC30.1.55 UrbanVision UrbanVision endorses David Soknacki for Ward 44 City Councillor For immediate release Toronto, Ontario, Canada 27 June 2017 With Toronto City Council set to appoint a councillor for Ward 44, two candidates have clearly emerged as the front-runners for the position. David Soknacki (former Scarborough City Councillor, former Toronto City Councillor, City’s budget chief under Mayor David Miller) and Jim Hart (former executive director of Municipal Licensing and Standards, former General Manager of Parks, Forestry, and Recreation). Ron Moeser was a Scarborough City Councillor, first elected in 1988. He was elected as Toronto City Councillor, three times, in closely contested elections by the 45,000 voters in Ward 44 (Scarborough East). He was an able and effective City Councillor placing the interests of Ward 44 residents first and foremost. While Jim Hart stepped in to handle the day to day “Mr. Soknacki’s residence should duties of former councillor Ron Moeser, during his not be a prerequisite for the illness, Mr. Hart has never been elected to office but position, especially as 25% of the rather has merely spent 30 years working for the City. current councillors do not reside in the Wards in which they were We believe that a City Councillor, elected or appointed, elected”, said Alan Kasperski, should ably represent the people rather than simply spokesperson for UrbanVision. "standing pretty firmly with the mayor" on any issue in “The most important factor Ward 44 and Toronto. between Mr. Soknacki and Mr. Hart should be experience; the Mayor John Tory has criticized Mr.
  • Novae Res Urbis

    Novae Res Urbis

    FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 2017 REFUSAL 3 20 YEARS LATER 4 Replacing rentals Vol. 21 Stronger not enough No. 24 t o g e t h e r 20TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION NRU TURNS 20! AND THE STORY CONTINUES… Dominik Matusik xactly 20 years ago today, are on our walk selling the NRU faxed out its first City neighbourhood. But not the E of Toronto edition. For the developers. The question is next two decades, it covered whether the developers will the ups and downs of the city’s join the walk.” planning, development, and From 2017, it seems like municipal affairs news, though the answer to that question is a email has since replaced the fax resounding yes. machine. Many of the issues “One of the innovative the city cared about in 1997 still parts of the Regent Park resonate in 2017. From ideas for Revitalization,” downtown the new Yonge-Dundas Square city planning manager David to development charges along Oikawa wrote in an email the city’s latest subway line and to NRU, “was the concept of trepidations about revitalizing using [condos] to fund the Regent Park. It was an eventful needed new assisted public year. housing. A big unknown at The entire first edition of Novæ Res Urbis (2 pages), June 16, 1997 Below are some headlines from the time was [whether] that NRU’s first year and why these concept [would] work. Would issues continue to captivate us. private home owners respond to the idea of living and New Life for Regent Park investing in a mixed, integrated (July 7, 1997) community? Recently, some condo townhouses went on sale In 1997, NRU mused about the in Regent Park and were sold future of Regent Park.
  • Item MM37.16

    Item MM37.16

    Agenda Item History - 2013.MM37.16 http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.MM... Item Tracking Status City Council adopted this item on July 16, 2013 without amendments. City Council consideration on July 16, 2013 MM37.16 ACTION Adopted Ward:All Protecting the Great Lakes from Invasive Species: Asian Carp - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie City Council Decision City Council on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013, adopted the following: 1. City Council write a letter to the Federal and Provincial Ministers of the Environment strongly urging all parties to work in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to identify a preferred solution to the invasive carp issue and move forward to implement that solution with the greatest sense of urgency. Background Information (City Council) Member Motion MM37.16 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60220.pdf) Communications (City Council) (July 10, 2013) Letter from Dr. Terry Quinney, Provincial Manager, Fish and Wildlife Services, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (MM.Supp.MM37.16.1) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39105.pdf) (July 12, 2013) Letter from Dr. Mark Gloutney, Director of Regional Operations - Eastern Region, Ducks Unlimited Canada (MM.Supp.MM37.16.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39106.pdf) (July 12, 2013) E-mail from Terry Rees, Executive Director, Federation of Ontario Cottagers' Association (MM.Supp.MM37.16.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39097.pdf) (July 16, 2013) Letter from Bob Kortright, Past President, Toronto Field Naturalists (MM.New.MM37.16.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39184.pdf) Motions (City Council) Motion to Waive Referral (Carried) Speaker Nunziata advised Council that the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, require that Motion MM37.16 be referred to the Executive Committee.
  • Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

    Voice of the Community since 1949 Save the date! December 2018 Vol. 03, No 10 The next monthly meeting of the CCRA will be on January 8, 2019, 7:15 p.m., at Port Union C.C. All Centennial Centennial News residents are welcome. A publication of the Centennial Community and Recreation Association www.ccranews.com Merry Christmas Seasonal events you won’t want and Happy New Year! to miss Community Carol Sing The annual Community Carol Sing, co-sponsored by St. Dunstan of Canter- bury Anglican Church and the Centennial Community Recreation Association, will be held at the church (56 Lawson Rd.) on Sunday, December 9 at 7:30 p.m. This is a joyful gathering filled with Christmas songs and carols and amusing stories and videos. It’s a popular event so come early to get a seat. Tree Lighting Party The Second Annual Community Tree Lighting Party, organized by Alan and Jodi Gear, takes place on Saturday, December 8 at the Port Union Community Centre (5450 Lawrence Ave. E). The fun gets underway at 5 p.m. with the tree lighting starting at 7:30. They’ve got 30 vendors, photos with Santa, face painting, games, hot chocolate Or maybe we should say Meowy Christmas and Yappy New Year! Many thanks to Ron Craig, Ashley and Don Paul, Heather Courneya, and a Christmas movie. This year the event Margot Russell, Stephanie Lake, Zinta Erdmanis, Lucie and Al Megahy, and Linda and Tom Carlton for contributing their festive pet photos. will take place in the gym as well as in the hallway so there will be more room to move around.
  • Funding Arts and Culture Top-10 Law Firms

    Funding Arts and Culture Top-10 Law Firms

    TORONTO EDITION FRIDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2016 Vol. 20 • No. 49 2017 budget overview 19th annual Toronto rankings FUNDING ARTS TOP-10 AND CULTURE DEVELOPMENT By Leah Wong LAW FIRMS To meet its 2017 target of $25 per capita spending in arts and culture council will need to, not only waive its 2.6 per cent reduction target, but approve an increase of $2.2-million in the It was another busy year at the OMB for Toronto-based 2017 economic development and culture budget. appeals. With few developable sites left in the city’s growth Economic development and culture manager Michael areas, developers are pushing forward with more challenging Williams has requested a $61.717-million net operating proposals such as the intensifi cation of existing apartment budget for 2017, a 3.8 per cent increase over last year. neighbourhoods, the redevelopment of rental apartments with Th e division’s operating budget allocates funding to its implications for tenant relocation, and the redevelopment of four service centres—art services (60 per cent), museum and existing towers such as the Grand Hotel, to name just a few. heritage services (18 per cent), business services (14 per cent) While only a few years ago a 60-storey tower proposal and entertainment industries services (8 per cent). may have seemed stratospheric, the era of the supertall tower One of the division’s major initiatives for 2017 is the city’s has undeniably arrived. In last year’s Toronto law review, the Canada 150 celebrations. At the end of 2017 with the Canada 82- and 92-storey Mirvish + Gehry towers were the tallest 150 initiatives completed, $4.284-million in one-time funding buildings brought before the board.
  • Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council Paid by Agencies, Corporations and Other Bodies for January 1, 2018 to November 30, 2018

    Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council Paid by Agencies, Corporations and Other Bodies for January 1, 2018 to November 30, 2018

    Attachment 1 - 44 City of Toronto Summary of Remuneration and Expenses for Members of Council For the year ended November 30, 2018 Office Expenses Expenses from the Corporate Expenses Charged to Expenses Paid by Remuneration (See Council General Business Travel City Divisions Agencies, Corporations Total Ward and Benefits (See Support Staff Appendices B1, Budget (See (See Appendix (See Appendix and Other Bodies (See Remuneration and Member of Council No. Appendix A) Salaries F) Appendices B2, F) C1) D) Appendix E) Expenses $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Ainslie, Paul 43 130,978 214,670 29,915 8,060 82 383,705 Augimeri, Maria 9 250,524 218,874 8,978 12,015 3,243 493,634 Bailão, Ana 18 127,783 218,006 29,867 19,785 410 395,851 Burnside, Jon 26 165,925 218,887 26,813 5,963 269 417,857 Campbell, John 4 166,363 93,956 11,010 2,184 264 273,777 Carmichael Greb, Christin 16 169,119 201,476 27,139 3,374 595 401,703 Carroll, Shelley (Note 10) 33 152,727 50,044 7,574 4,358 357 215,060 Colle, Josh 15 207,221 163,876 29,425 4,334 4,567 105,629 515,052 Crawford, Gary 36 130,978 218,887 27,654 6,675 43 384,237 Cressy, Joe 20 130,863 216,847 5,527 68,384 603 422,224 Crisanti, Vincent 1 209,346 176,288 22,777 3,913 555 412,879 Davis, Janet 31 245,673 218,432 16,364 5,641 231 486,341 De Baeremaeker, Glenn 38 245,673 218,647 29,244 7,929 501,493 Di Ciano, Justin 5 169,119 181,575 11,027 5,417 151 367,289 Di Giorgio, Frank 12 228,308 218,887 21,515 19,826 347 488,883 Doucette, Sarah 13 207,221 195,977 15,141 3,404 182 421,925 Filion, John 23 128,824 214,872 26,277 73,940
  • Voting Records on Transit

    Voting Records on Transit

    2017 Toronto's Hands Yonge subway extension (subway station accessibility). Sheppard subway extension. votes not calculated) dedicated to transit service and build the Scarborough subway $2 million to relieve overcrowding Personal Vehicle Tax, with revenues friendly decisions (absent expansion, and compliance with AODA Program for low-income Torontoniansbudgets when you factor in inflation. EX3.4 (M3a) - Do not report on reinstatingEX16.1 (M1) - Proceed with theEX16.1 plan to (M9) - Request report consideringEX16.37routes (M2b) as part- consider of 2017 cutting budgetEX 20.10TTC direction (M2) - Do not establishEX25.18 Fair2017 -Pass Votelevels to for freeze 2018, all effectively budgetsEX22.2 andat cutting(M2) traction - Don't power fund TTCreliability signalEX25.1 initiatives track (M6b) in- Prioiritize ReliefEX31.2 Line (M3)over - Increase the TTCMM41.36 budget by - Keeping Toronto'sVotes Transit in favour in of transit rider- LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2015.EX3.4LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.EX16.1LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.EX16.37LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.EX20.10LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2017.EX25.18 LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2017.EX22.2LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2017.EX25.1LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.EX31.2LINK: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.MM41.36