Reaching New Heights for Orangutans
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Board of Directors Meeting
Board of Directors Meeting Agenda and Meeting Book THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2019 FROM 08:30 AM TO 11:30 AM WATERFRONT TORONTO 20 BAY STREET, SUITE 1310 TORONTO, ON, M5J 2N8 Meeting Book - Board of Directors Meeting Agenda 8:30 a.m. 1. Motion to Approve Meeting Agenda Approval S. Diamond 8:35 a.m. 2. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest Declaration All 8:40 a.m. 3. Chair’s Opening Remarks Information S. Diamond 8:50 a.m. 4. Consent Agenda a) Draft Minutes of Open Session of the October 10 and 24, 2019 Board Approval All Meeting - Page 4 b) Draft Minutes of Open Session of the October 31, 2019 Board Approval All Meeting - Page 11 c) CEO Report - Page 15 Information G. Zegarac d) Finance Audit and Risk Management (FARM) Committee Chair's Information K. Sullivan Open Session Report - Page 44 e) Human Resources, Governance and Stakeholder Relations (HRGSR) Information S. Palvetzian Committee Chair's Open Session Report - Page 47 f) Investment, Real Estate and Quayside (IREQ) Committe Chair's Open Information M. Mortazavi Session Report - Page 48 9:00 a.m. 5. Port Lands Flood Protection (60% Design Stage Gate Status Approval D. Kusturin Update) Cover Sheet - Page 49 Presentation is attached as Appendix A to the Board Book 9:15 a.m. 6. Waterfront Toronto Priority Projects - Construction Update Information D. Kusturin Cover sheet - Page 50 Presentation is attached as Appendix B to the Board Book 9:30 a.m. 7. Motion to go into Closed Session Approval All Closed Session Agenda The Board will discuss items 8, 9 (a), (b), (c), (d) & (e) , 10, 11 and -
THE FALSE PANACEA of CITY CHARTERS? a POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE on the CASE of TORONTO Andrew Sancton
Volume 9 • Issue 3 • January 2016 THE FALSE PANACEA OF CITY CHARTERS? A POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CASE OF TORONTO Andrew Sancton SUMMARY Toronto is unlike any other city, as its local boosters will not hesitate to point out. That was the basis, after all, of the “charter movement” that demanded special rights for a mega-city that the movement’s backers insisted was so vital that it even warranted a status similar to that of an entire province. Their efforts culminated in the province’s passage in 2006 of the City of Toronto Act, which appeared on its face to grant the metropolis the power it believed it required and merited. In reality, the Ontario government may have actually set Toronto back, leaving it more at the mercy of provincial power than other smaller municipalities. The few additional taxation powers that were granted by the ostensible Toronto “charter” — the City of Toronto Act — are, in reality, still overseen by the province, which retains the right to limit those revenue tools if it considers it “desirable in the provincial interest to do so.” But while Toronto may have been given just a small number of revenue tools, which it has used only sparingly, and the use of those tools is ultimately decided by Queen’s Park, their very existence has given the province licence to sidestep the city’s calls for more funding. The provincial Liberals have, in the past, insisted that Toronto make use of its own taxes before it demands more provincial funds. Meanwhile, the City of Toronto Act did nothing to curtail the power of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). -
The Rotary Club of Toronto Volume 106 | Issue 11 | October 12, 2018
The Rotary Club of Toronto Volume 106 | Issue 11 | October 12, 2018 Today’s Program Host MARK THE DAY! Toronto Mayor John Tory Don Bell, Past President 2000-01 Topic Leadership That Works, Location OCTOBER 22, 2018 - CLUB ASSEMBLY A conversation with John Tory The National Club, Shape our future! Together we can realize our continued 303 Bay St. success and growth: Road Map 20/20! Part of our strategic plan is to determine a focus. Do we have one? Do we need As the 65th Mayor of Toronto, John to create one? If we already have one do we need to re- Tory has led the way in tackling traffic invigorate our focus, celebrate it, brand it, promote it? congestion and building transit. Let’s talk about it October 22 at the Annual Club Assembly. Mayor Tory has taken action to reduce commute times while moving forward 5:30 -8:00 The National Club. Cost one lunch ticket. with Toronto’s first-ever network transit Register through the office. plan that will see subway lines extended through the northwest end of the city This is a member only event. It is your club and we need into Vaughan and east to Scarborough, your thoughts as to where and how we go forward. a significant expansion of the LRT network, and much greater use of GO lines across the city as part of SmartTrack, the Mayor’s signature transit initiative. Since being elected to office in 2014, he has been focused on ensuring Toronto remains a livable and affordable city, leading City Council in passing successive budgets that kept taxes at or below the rate of inflation while investing in priority services including housing, parks and student nutrition. -
Subway Vs. Light Rail Transit
Thesis Inquiry Paper Subway vs. Light Rail Transit Submitted by: Fahad Khan Prepared for: Prof. Krantzberg Submission Date: September 19th, 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iv 1. Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background and Motivation ........................................................................................... 2 3. Central Question ............................................................................................................. 3 4. Anticipated Findings ....................................................................................................... 5 5. Methods, Results and Discussion ................................................................................... 6 5.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 6 5.2 LRT Model (Transit City) ......................................................................................... 7 5.2.1 Public Opinion ................................................................................................... -
Resource Package
WHAT’S NEW AT THE ZOO Part 2 Resource Package TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE TO EDUCATOR ............................................................................................ 3 TORONTO ZOO RESOURCES ................................................................................. 3 GIANT PANDAS – TELUS PANDA CAM ................................................................... 4 WESTERN LOWLAND GORILLA ............................................................................... 5 THINK BEYOND THE SCIENCE CURRICULUM ............................................................ 7 ENRICHMENT ....................................................................................................... 8 ALL ABOUT BATS ............................................................................................... 10 GIANT PANDAS - A GIANT CELEBRATION .............................................................. 11 2 NOTE TO EDUCATOR The Toronto Zoo’s Education Branch is pleased to provide you with the What’s New at the Zoo Resource Package – Part 2, which we hope will provide you with ideas on how to spark your students’ curiosity about the natural world, as well as how to incorporate the Toronto Zoo and conservation into your classroom. This resource package, along with Part 1, is a compilation of the articles highlighting wildlife and on-going conservation efforts at the Toronto Zoo, along with associated classroom connections, that have been published in the monthly Educator e-Newsletter since fall 2013. The classroom connections cover a variety -
Communication from Jennifer Mckelvie, Centennial Community and Recreation Association, Ron Wootton, Coronation Community Associa
PW11.4.1 Toronto Public Works and Infrastructure Committee City Hall - 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Sent Via Email: [email protected] February 19th, 2016 Re: AGENDA ITEM PW11.14 - Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant - Biosolids Class Environmental Assessment Dear Members of the Committee, This letter is to indicate that the executive committees of the five Community Associations, located nearest to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant (HCTP), stand in solidarity supporting Alternative 1 (a new fluidized bed incinerator) as the preferred solution for biosolids management. Individual deputations will also be submitted by each association. Our five community associations cover a large portion of the Ward 43 and Ward 44 study area in the Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment. Specifically we represent a contiguous area spanning: Guildwood Village: Approximately 3000 households in the south of Ward 43 from Lake Ontario to Guildwood Parkway and the railway tracks. Coronation Community: Approximately 3000 households in Ward 43/44 from Guildwood Station to Beechgrove (Highland Creek) and the railway tracks to Morningside Park. Centennial Community: Approximately 4,000 households in Ward 44 from Highland Creek to Port Union Road and Lake Ontario to Kingston Road. Highland Creek Community: Approximately 4000 households in Ward 44 from Military Trail and Morningside Ave. in the west to the convergence of Kingston Rd and the 401 in the east. West Rouge Community: Approximately 3000 households in Ward 44 from Port Union Road to Rouge Park and Lake Ontario to the 401. All five residents associations have actively participated in the Environmental and Health Impacts Assessments by attending Public Information Centres (PIC), sharing information in our community newsletters, and attending stakeholder meetings. -
TORONTO CITY COUNCIL ORDER PAPER Meeting 41 Thursday, May
TORONTO CITY COUNCIL ORDER PAPER Meeting 41 Thursday, May 24, 2018 Total Items: 23 TODAY’S BUSINESS 9:30 a.m. Call to Order Routine Matters Recognition of the City of Toronto First Responders, Faith Communities and City Staff involved with the April 23rd Yonge Street Tragedy and the April 29th Toronto Strong Vigil Council will review and adopt the Order Paper* 12:30 p.m. Council will recess 2:00 p.m. Council will reconvene Members of Council can release holds on Agenda Items 6:00 p.m. Council will recess 6:30 p.m. Council will reconvene Prior to 8:00 p.m. Members of Council can release holds on Agenda Items Council will enact General Bills Council will enact a Confirming Bill 8:00 p.m. Council will adjourn * Once the Order Paper has been approved by Council, a change requires a two-thirds vote 2 Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 29 PW29.1 Metrolinx Projects: Temporary Delegation for Long-Term Road Held Closures (Ward 1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 21, 22, 25, 26, 28, 30, 35, 37, Councillor Gord 42, 43, 44) Perks PW29.3 Improving Accountability in the Utility Cut Process (Ward All) Held Councillor Jaye Communications PW29.3.1 and PW29.3.2 have been submitted on Robinson this Item PW29.5 StreetARToronto Road Mural Pilot Program (Ward All) Held Councillor Paula Fletcher PW29.6 Next Steps on Traffic Safety Measures (Ward All) Held Councillor Paula Fletcher PW29.7 Chapter 918 Technical Amendments: Clarifying the Calculation of Held Landscaping Requirements for Front Yard Parking (Ward All) Deputy Mayor Stephen Bills 658 and 659 -
Review of Toronto Port Authority Report
REVIEW OF TORONTO PORT AUTHORITY REPORT By: Roger Tassé, O.C., Q.C. Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Barristers & Solicitors October 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................5 PART I THE EARLY DAYS.......................................................................................8 • The establishment of the Toronto Harbour Commission, 1911......8 • THC Responsibility and Corporate Structure...................................8 • Development of the Waterfront..........................................................9 • The arrival of airplanes.......................................................................9 THE 1983 TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT...................................................... 12 THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT (CROMBIE COMMISSION)............. 13 • Its mandate and its recommendations............................................ 13 THE RESPONSE TO THE CROMBIE COMMISSION REPORT................ 15 • The City of Toronto Response......................................................... 15 • The Federal Government Response................................................ 16 TOWARDS A NATIONAL MARINE POLICY............................................. 19 • Bill C-44 – in the House of Commons ............................................. 20 • Bill C-44 – in the Senate .................................................................. -
Weak Mayor’ System?
Does Canada have a ‘weak mayor’ system? Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA) Ryerson University – Toronto, Ontario Working draft – for discussion Please do not cite without author’s permission Kate Graham, PhD Candidate Political Science Department Western University [email protected] May 2017 KATE GRAHAM | Page 2 Introduction1 In every Canadian city, the mayor is an important figure. Mayors lead elected councils, serve as chief executives of municipal corporations, and are generally the most well known local officials. Big city mayors are directly elected by more people than any other federal or provincial politician in Canada.2 In times of celebration and crisis, mayors are the voices of their cities on the provincial, national and international stage. They are praised for their communities’ successes and blamed for their failures. In many ways, the mayor is “the living symbol of [their] city” (Ruchelman 1969, 4). Despite the significance of the position, remarkably little is known about the role of Canadian mayors. The responsibilities of mayors in Canada are “vague” (Lightbody 2006, 156) and “generally quite unclear” (Sancton 1994, 175). There is no ‘job description’ for mayors; in fact, there are more than 50 pieces of provincial legislation in Canada prescribing duties of mayors, not including municipal bylaws and policies. A surprisingly small volume of literature exists on the topic. To date, there has not been a comprehensive study of mayors in Canada, and foundational questions about the role and the degree to which it is equipped to provide leadership in Canada’s cities remain unanswered. -
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Voice of the Community since 1949 Save the date! December 2018 Vol. 03, No 10 The next monthly meeting of the CCRA will be on January 8, 2019, 7:15 p.m., at Port Union C.C. All Centennial Centennial News residents are welcome. A publication of the Centennial Community and Recreation Association www.ccranews.com Merry Christmas Seasonal events you won’t want and Happy New Year! to miss Community Carol Sing The annual Community Carol Sing, co-sponsored by St. Dunstan of Canter- bury Anglican Church and the Centennial Community Recreation Association, will be held at the church (56 Lawson Rd.) on Sunday, December 9 at 7:30 p.m. This is a joyful gathering filled with Christmas songs and carols and amusing stories and videos. It’s a popular event so come early to get a seat. Tree Lighting Party The Second Annual Community Tree Lighting Party, organized by Alan and Jodi Gear, takes place on Saturday, December 8 at the Port Union Community Centre (5450 Lawrence Ave. E). The fun gets underway at 5 p.m. with the tree lighting starting at 7:30. They’ve got 30 vendors, photos with Santa, face painting, games, hot chocolate Or maybe we should say Meowy Christmas and Yappy New Year! Many thanks to Ron Craig, Ashley and Don Paul, Heather Courneya, and a Christmas movie. This year the event Margot Russell, Stephanie Lake, Zinta Erdmanis, Lucie and Al Megahy, and Linda and Tom Carlton for contributing their festive pet photos. will take place in the gym as well as in the hallway so there will be more room to move around. -
Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council Paid by Agencies, Corporations and Other Bodies for January 1, 2018 to November 30, 2018
Attachment 1 - 44 City of Toronto Summary of Remuneration and Expenses for Members of Council For the year ended November 30, 2018 Office Expenses Expenses from the Corporate Expenses Charged to Expenses Paid by Remuneration (See Council General Business Travel City Divisions Agencies, Corporations Total Ward and Benefits (See Support Staff Appendices B1, Budget (See (See Appendix (See Appendix and Other Bodies (See Remuneration and Member of Council No. Appendix A) Salaries F) Appendices B2, F) C1) D) Appendix E) Expenses $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Ainslie, Paul 43 130,978 214,670 29,915 8,060 82 383,705 Augimeri, Maria 9 250,524 218,874 8,978 12,015 3,243 493,634 Bailão, Ana 18 127,783 218,006 29,867 19,785 410 395,851 Burnside, Jon 26 165,925 218,887 26,813 5,963 269 417,857 Campbell, John 4 166,363 93,956 11,010 2,184 264 273,777 Carmichael Greb, Christin 16 169,119 201,476 27,139 3,374 595 401,703 Carroll, Shelley (Note 10) 33 152,727 50,044 7,574 4,358 357 215,060 Colle, Josh 15 207,221 163,876 29,425 4,334 4,567 105,629 515,052 Crawford, Gary 36 130,978 218,887 27,654 6,675 43 384,237 Cressy, Joe 20 130,863 216,847 5,527 68,384 603 422,224 Crisanti, Vincent 1 209,346 176,288 22,777 3,913 555 412,879 Davis, Janet 31 245,673 218,432 16,364 5,641 231 486,341 De Baeremaeker, Glenn 38 245,673 218,647 29,244 7,929 501,493 Di Ciano, Justin 5 169,119 181,575 11,027 5,417 151 367,289 Di Giorgio, Frank 12 228,308 218,887 21,515 19,826 347 488,883 Doucette, Sarah 13 207,221 195,977 15,141 3,404 182 421,925 Filion, John 23 128,824 214,872 26,277 73,940 -
Member Motion City Council MM31.47
Member Motion City Council MM31.47 ACTION Ward: All City of Toronto Nominations to Rouge National Urban Park Multi- Stakeholder and Public Advisory Committee - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. Recommendations Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council nominate the following three individuals, based on their position and expertise, as the City of Toronto's representatives to the Rouge National Urban Park Multi-Stakeholder and Public Advisory Committee and that the appropriate City officials submit the City's nominations to Parks Canada before April 23, 2021: a. Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Member of City Council for Scarborough-Rouge Park; b. Dolf DeJong, Chief Administrative Officer of the Toronto Zoo; and c. Kim Statham, Acting Director of Urban Forestry, Parks Forestry and Recreation. Summary Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, and Minister responsible for Parks Canada, has invited the City of Toronto to nominate up to three individuals to its Rouge National Urban Park Multi-Stakeholder and Public Advisory Committee. Under the Terms of Reference for this Advisory Committee, the City can nominate up to three elected officials or City staff (for example, technical or subject matter experts), or a combination of both. Members will serve a term of up to four years. The Terms of Reference are attached. The Advisory Committee will also include representatives from Parks Canada's Rouge National Urban Park First Nations Advisory Circle (up to 10 members), York Region (up to 3 members), Durham Region (up to 3 members), the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (1 member), the Province of Ontario (1 member) and members of the public (6 members).