DOCSLIB.ORG

3.07 Metrolinx—LRT Construction and Infrastructure Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3.07 Metrolinx—LRT Construction and Infrastructure Planning Chapter 3 Section 3.07 Metrolinx—LRT Construction and Infrastructure Planning Sheppard East, Scarborough Rapid Transit, 1.0 Summary Hamilton and Hurontario. We focused on the Eglinton Crosstown, as this was the only project in construction during our audit. Metrolinx is the regional transportation agency We found that Metrolinx incurred about responsible for planning an integrated regional $436 million in sunk and additional costs between transit system for the Greater Toronto and Hamil- 2009 and 2018 because of problems with how the ton Area (GTHA), overseeing transit capital pro- transit-planning process evolved for the GTHA jects, and operating GO Transit trains and buses, and how Metrolinx carries out its responsibilities. the Union Pearson Express and the PRESTO fare Figure 1 summarizes this based on the LRT projects payment system. Metrolinx’s responsibilities are set our audit examined: out in the Metrolinx Act, 2006 (Act). Sunk Costs Resulting from Project Changes. In November 2008, Metrolinx formally adopted • Chapter 3 • VFM Section 3.07 After the LRT projects were announced or its first Regional Transportation Plan. It was a agreed on, the provincial and municipal 25-year plan setting out the priorities, policies and governments changed their decisions on what programs for a regional transportation system for to build and when to build, even though sig- the GTHA. Among its top 15 transit priorities in nificant investments had already been made. the first 15 years were five “rapid transit” projects For instance, the City of Toronto overrode that would allow people to travel quickly in special previous decisions on the Scarborough transit vehicles that have “exclusive right of way” (other project three times, ultimately resulting in the vehicles are not allowed on the lanes). The high cancellation of the Scarborough RT project capacity of the special vehicles and the exclusive altogether. As well, the Sheppard LRT has right of way make this transport more “rapid,” or been delayed for more than 10 years from its faster, than transport like traditional buses and initial expected completion in 2013. streetcars, which are smaller vehicles that travel on Costs Over and Above Original Contract Values. lanes shared with other vehicles. • Metrolinx had to spend extra money to get Our audit looked at Metrolinx’s regional the consortium already designing and con- planning responsibilities and work, and its structing the Eglinton Crosstown LRT (AFP oversight of a number of its rapid transit capital consortium) to settle claims and commit to projects that have been designated as “light rail complete the project by its original comple- transit” (LRT): Eglinton Crosstown, Finch West, tion date of 2021. As well, Metrolinx had to 322 Metrolinx—LRT Construction and Infrastructure Planning 323 Figure 1: Sunk and Additional Costs on the LRT Projects, 2009–2018 Prepared by the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario $ million Sunk Costs Resulting from Project Changes1 Cancellation of Scarborough RT project (see Section 4.1) 75 Delay in Sheppard LRT project (see Section 4.1) 50 Subtotal 125 Costs Over and Above Original Contract Values2 Eglinton Crosstown LRT settlement (see Section 4.4.2) 237 Amendments to LRT vehicles contract (see Section 4.6.1) 49 Subtotal 286 Additional Contract Management Costs Oversight, administrative, contingency-plan and legal costs for vehicles contract3 (see Section 4.6.2) 25 Potential increase to program management consultant contracts (see Section 4.5) n/a4 Subtotal 25 Total 436 1. These costs resulted from problems with how the transit-planning process works in Ontario. Projects can be cancelled and delayed because of provincial and municipal government decisions. The investments made to that point lead to no result. 2. These costs resulted from how Metrolinx carried out its responsibilities. This required Metrolinx to spend money that it never planned to. 3. For the vehicles contract, these consist of oversight, administrative, contingency-plan and legal costs Metrolinx spent to manage the LRT vehicle supplier’s slow response to quality and schedule issues that caused concerns for Metrolinx. 4. For the program management consultant contracts, these may entail amendments to increase their upper limits because significant portions of their values were spent earlier on in the contracts. negotiate changes to the light rail vehicles it would still finish the project on time. The contract with the vehicle supplier because of AFP consortium consists of ACS, AECON, Ellis- revised projects and timelines. Don and SNC-Lavalin. Under an AFP contract Chapter 3 • VFM Section 3.07 • Additional Contract Management Costs. awarded in July 2015, the AFP consortium Metrolinx incurred additional contract was to provide Metrolinx with a detailed six- management costs after raising concerns month work schedule and update it monthly. about the vehicle supplier’s poor performance If it were to find that it was unable to meet the in designing the vehicles. They included substantial completion date, it would have to paying consultants and lawyers to help it try submit a report identifying the reasons for the to cancel the contract and resolve the dispute. delay and a plan for eliminating or reducing In addition, Metrolinx’s current rate of use the delay. The AFP consortium began falling of program management consultants poses a behind schedule in 2017. Metrolinx had the risk that additional money will be needed to right under the AFP contract to ask for addi- complete the delivery of the projects. tional information from the AFP consortium Regarding the construction of the Eglinton in order to perform a detailed assessment Crosstown LRT, our audit found that: of the work schedule if the AFP consortium • Under the Alternative Financing and Pro- indicated that project completion would curement (AFP) contract, Metrolinx had be delayed or if in Metrolinx’s opinion the limited remedies available to it to hold the consortium had fallen significantly behind the AFP consortium responsible for project work schedule; however, Metrolinx did not do delays as long as the consortium certified so because the AFP consortium represented 324 that it could still finish on time. The AFP adjacent to the existing West Don River consortium continued to submit schedules Bridge and a Salvation Army building. with increasing delays throughout 2017, and • Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario Metrolinx communicated its concerns about developed a risk register to negotiate the the delays, but the AFP consortium did not settlement to the claim, but Metrolinx adequately address them. In December 2017, did not have sufficient documentation of Metrolinx met with senior consortium man- evidence linking the settlement amount agement, at which time the AFP consortium to the AFP consortium’s claims that was still certifying it would meet the con- Metrolinx was partially responsible for tracted completion date of September 2021 project delays. We reviewed the settlement and indicated that in February 2018 it would negotiation process and confirmed that provide solutions to mitigate schedule delays. Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario used However, the AFP consortium instead filed a risk register, based on their analysis of a claim against Metrolinx in February 2018 the AFP contract, to estimate a settlement for extension of the project completion date amount. However, Metrolinx could not to October 2022. The claim also requested provide us with sufficient documentation compensation because Metrolinx allegedly confirming whether the project delays were was not helping the AFP consortium overcome or were not in part its responsibility and scheduling and cost challenges. The AFP factoring that assessment into the settlement contract with the consortium does not provide amount. We noted as well that the AFP Metrolinx with adequate remedies to address consortium also did not provide information project delays that it knows of early in the that linked responsibility for project delays project; the remedies take effect only when to compensation amounts, either before or the AFP consortium has declared that it will when it initiated its claim. not meet the completion date. • Approvals of designs and the AFP consor- Chapter 3 • VFM Section 3.07 • The AFP contract did not fully transfer tium’s delivery schedule were affected by responsibility for the risks of project the AFP consortium’s late submission of delays and cost overruns to the AFP designs and the designs’ poor quality as consortium, as evidenced by Metrolinx reported by Metrolinx’s technical advisors. having to pay the AFP consortium Deficiencies in the designs submitted by the $237 million to hold it to the completion AFP consortium included missing system date of September 2021. In an AFP project, elements (for example, signalling and fire a private-sector consortium is paid a detection equipment in tunnels). As well, premium to bear the risks of project delays the AFP consortium has constructed parts of and cost overruns. However, under the the project before having the overall design Eglinton Crosstown LRT AFP contract, the approved by third parties, creating a risk responsibility for these risks was not fully that it will later need to make unplanned and transferred to the AFP consortium. In August less-than-optimal modifications because the 2018, Metrolinx settled the AFP consortium’s completed work is not in compliance with the claim against it, paying the AFP consortium AFP contract (such modifications are made at $237 million to hold the AFP consortium to the consortium’s own cost). Metrolinx’s tech- the contracted completion date of September nical advisors observed that if design issues 2021. In addition, Metrolinx agreed to accept are not resolved, the Eglinton Crosstown LRT later delivery dates for the pedestrian bridges may not be found at the end of scheduled Metrolinx—LRT Construction and Infrastructure Planning 325 construction to be fully compliant with the regardless of the amount. We noted a number requirements in the AFP contract and/or of cases where Metrolinx requested that par- may not function properly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MINUTES 16-026 10:30 A.M
    SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MINUTES 16-026 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, October 25, 2016 Council Chambers Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West ______________________________________________________________________ Present: Mayor F. Eisenberger, Deputy Mayor D. Skelly (Chair) Councillors T. Whitehead, T. Jackson, C. Collins, S. Merulla, M. Green, J. Farr, A. Johnson, D. Conley, M. Pearson, B. Johnson, L. Ferguson, R. Pasuta, J. Partridge Absent with Regrets: Councillor A. VanderBeek – Personal _____________________________________________________________________ THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE REFERRED TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update (PED16199) (City Wide) (Item 5.1) (Conley/Pearson) That Report PED16199, respecting the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update, be received. CARRIED 2. Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration (PW16066) (City Wide) (Item 6.1) (Eisenberger/Ferguson) That Report PW16066, respecting Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration, be received. CARRIED 3. Possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B- Line (7.2) (Merulla/Whitehead) That staff be directed to communicate with Metrolinx to determine the possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B-Line and report back to the LRT Sub-Committee. CARRIED General Issues Committee October 25, 2016 Minutes 16-026 Page 2 of 26 4. LRT Project Not to Negatively Affect Hamilton’s Allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Revenue or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding (Item 7.3) (Collins/Merulla) That the Province of Ontario be requested to commit that the Hamilton Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project will not negatively affect Hamilton’s allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Funding or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding.
    [Show full text]
  • General Overview
    HAMILTON LIGHT RAIL LRT TRANSIT GENERAL OVERVIEW WHAT IS LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)? WHO’S PAYING FOR LRT? Light Rail Transit (LRT) is a transportation system based As part of Metrolinx’s “Moving Ontario Forward Plan,” the on electrically powered trains usually in a segregated Ontario government is investing up to $1 billion covering right-of-way. They are designed to deliver reliable, 100% of the capital cost. It’s part of the largest comfortable and convenient transportation services. infrastructure investment in Ontario's history. HOW WILL IT RUN? WHEN WILL IT BE BUILT ? LRT on the B-line will operate in the centre of the The construction consortium will be in place with road for most of the route and will be segregated some early work beginning mid-2018. Major from other traffic with a curbed barrier. This helps construction of the LRT is scheduled for 2019 to ensure a rapid, reliable and safe LRT system. There 2024. The B-line will be 11 km in length with 13 will be trains running on two tracks; one running in stops. The A-line spur will be 2 km in length with 5 each direction in the centre of the road. The LRT will stops (pending budget). be given priority over other traffic at signalized intersections wherever possible. www.metrolinx.com www.hamilton.ca/LRT WHERE WILL THE LRT RUN? WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF LRT? HOW OFTEN WILL IT RUN? LRT will provide Hamilton with fast, reliable, convenient The trains will run approximately every five minutes and integrated transit, including connections to the during peak hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT
    Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX M – Consultation Record March 2010 March 2010 Appendix M Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices 3.0 List of Interested Persons Participating in the Consultations 1.0 Introduction This appendix documents in detail the consultations carried out with the technical agencies, the public, Consultation was carried out to encourage technical agencies to provide input during the course of the and the First Nations communities. study. The following agencies were invited to be involved and provide comment on the TPAP study for the EFWLRT: 2.0 Description of Consultations and Follow-up Efforts The general public, government agencies and various interest groups were provided opportunities to Government Review Agencies Technical Agencies Canadian Environmental Assessment All Stream review and comment on this project during the course of the study. The City of Toronto Public Agency Consultation Team was involved in the overall public consultation process. They offered a wide range Environmental Canada MTA All Stream Inc. of communication methods to the public, including project web site, dedicated telephone number, fax, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Telus and email address for contacting the project team. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Enwave Energy Corporation (INAC) Transportation Canada-Ontario Region Group Telecom/360 Network Technical agencies, including federal, provincial, municipal agencies, utilities, and potential interested Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs Hydro One Network Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Service Breaks Ground in Mississauga
    No. H0xx/10 For release August 20, 2010 BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE BREAKS GROUND IN MISSISSAUGA MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO — Bob Dechert, Member of Parliament, Mississauga-Erindale, the Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Ontario’s Transportation Minister, Her Worship Hazel McCallion, Mayor of Mississauga and Gary McNeil, GO Transit Managing Director participated in a groundbreaking ceremony today to mark the start of construction of the Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor. This project, which is expected to be completed in spring 2013, will improve local and inter-regional bus operations across the City of Mississauga. It involves constructing an 11-kilometre east-west busway across the City of Mississauga between Winston Churchill Boulevard and Renforth Drive in the City of Toronto and a total of 12 stations along the route with related commuter facilities. “Investments in public transit creates jobs and boosts the Canadian economy,” said MP Dechert. “This rapid transit system will provide commuters in Mississauga with a more efficient transit option, while cutting commute times and taking more cars off the road.” “This is great news for Mississauga residents,” said Ontario Transportation Minister Kathleen Wynne. “When the new bus rapid transit line is finished, more commuters will be able to leave their cars at home and take public transit. Investing in public transit is part of the McGuinty government’s Open Ontario plan. Better public transit means a better quality of life for Ontario families.” (TBC) “We are doing everything we can to make Mississauga a transit-oriented city and show our commitment to ensure we meet the needs of residents and businesses,” said Mayor Hazel McCallion.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Sign in So We Can Provide Updates and Information on Future Events
    HURONTARIO LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT Welcome Please sign in so we can provide updates and information on future events. metrolinx.com/HurontarioLRT [email protected] @HurontarioLRT WHAT IS THE HURONTARIO LRT PROJECT? The Hurontario Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project will bring 20 kilometres of fast, reliable, rapid transit to the cities of Mississauga and Brampton along the Hurontario corridor. New, modern light rail vehicles will travel in a dedicated right-of-way and serve 22 stops with connections to GO Transit’s Milton and Lakeshore West rail lines, Mississauga MiWay, Brampton Züm, and the Mississauga Transitway. Metrolinx is working in coordination with the cities of Mississauga and Brampton and the Region of Peel to advance the Hurontario LRT project. Preparatory construction is underway. The project is expected to be completed at the end of 2022. The Hurontario LRT project is funded through a $1.4 billion commitment from the Province of Ontario as part of the Moving Ontario Forward plan. Allandale LAKE SIMCOE Waterfront OUR RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK Barrie South Innisfil SIMCOE Bradford East Gwillimbury Newmarket NewmarketSouthlakeHuron Heights Leslie TODAY AND TOMORROW GO Bus Terminal Hwy 404 Eagle LEGEND Mulock Main Mulock Savage Longford Aurora Lincolnville Every train, subway and bus helps to keep us moving, connecting us to the people and places Bloomington King City Stouffville GO Rail that matter most. As our region grows, our transit system is growing too. Working with 19th- Gamble Bernard Gormley municipalities across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, and beyond, we’re delivering Kirby Elgin Mills Mount Joy Crosby Centennial new transit projects,making it easier, better, and faster for you to get around.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report
    GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report PREFACE The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) is one of several interim reports which depicts the study process culminating in the Transportation Development Strategy. The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) was first issued in July 2009. The reports purpose was to summarize the process and methodology that was used to identify transportation problems and opportunities, and to document the key findings of this work. In the consultation period following its release, the study team received comments relating to a range of issues, including municipal planning policy, transportation modelling, and planned transportation initiatives within the preliminary study area. The purpose of this revised draft report (December 2010) is to ensure that all comments received have been adequately addressed; where appropriate, the content of the report has been revised accordingly. Appendix C provides a Summary of the Input Received on the draft Problems and Opportunities Report, and details each comment received, the study team’s response, and any changes incorporated into the revised draft report. www.gta-west.com GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study
    [Show full text]
  • Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 APPLICABLE CRITERIA ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Transportation Noise Guidelines ............................................................................ 1 2.2 Vibration Guidelines ............................................................................................... 2 3.0 TRANSPORATION NOISE SOURCES ............................................................................ 3 3.1 Roadway Noise Sources ........................................................................................ 3 3.2 Light Rail Transit .................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Railway Noise Sound Levels .................................................................................. 3 4.0 TRANSPORTATION NOISE ASSESSMENT ................................................................... 4 4.1 Noise Control Recommendations .......................................................................... 4 5.0 VIBRATION ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................ 6 6.0 IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON ITSELF AND THE SURROUNDING AREA ........ 6 7.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 7 8.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Report Macro
    Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: JUNE 18, 2008 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE SHEPPARD EAST LRT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY ACTION ITEM: x RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission: 1. Approve the recommendation of the joint City/TTC Sheppard East LRT Environmental Assessment (EA) study, that a Light Rail Transit (LRT) line be constructed on Sheppard Avenue East, between Don Mills Station and Meadowvale Road, to provide transit service in that corridor, as outlined in this report; 2. Forward this report to the City of Toronto, and request that City Council, at it’s meeting on July 15, 2008, approve the recommendations of the Sheppard East LRT EA study to allow staff to begin detailed design as soon as possible, and be in a position to begin construction of this first Transit City light rail line in 2009; 3. Request that City Council: i) authorise staff to submit the final Environmental Assessment Study report for the 30-day public review period, as required to complete the EA process for this project; ii) advise the Province of Ontario of its approval of this EA study; 4. Note that City Planning is proceeding to amend the Toronto Official Plan so that Sheppard Avenue East, from McCowan Road to Meadowvale Road, is included as a Transit Priority Corridor, in support of this project; 5. Note that City Planning staff have been full participants in the preparation of this environmental assessment. They have reviewed this report, and they concur with its recommendations; and 6. Forward this report to Metrolinx, to confirm previous information that the Sheppard East light rail line is ready to proceed to implementation and, therefore, should be included in Metrolinx’s forthcoming ‘first wave’ funding approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting
    Board of Directors Meeting Agenda and Meeting Book THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2019 FROM 08:30 AM TO 11:30 AM WATERFRONT TORONTO 20 BAY STREET, SUITE 1310 TORONTO, ON, M5J 2N8 Meeting Book - Board of Directors Meeting Agenda 8:30 a.m. 1. Motion to Approve Meeting Agenda Approval S. Diamond 8:35 a.m. 2. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest Declaration All 8:40 a.m. 3. Chair’s Opening Remarks Information S. Diamond 8:50 a.m. 4. Consent Agenda a) Draft Minutes of Open Session of the October 10 and 24, 2019 Board Approval All Meeting - Page 4 b) Draft Minutes of Open Session of the October 31, 2019 Board Approval All Meeting - Page 11 c) CEO Report - Page 15 Information G. Zegarac d) Finance Audit and Risk Management (FARM) Committee Chair's Information K. Sullivan Open Session Report - Page 44 e) Human Resources, Governance and Stakeholder Relations (HRGSR) Information S. Palvetzian Committee Chair's Open Session Report - Page 47 f) Investment, Real Estate and Quayside (IREQ) Committe Chair's Open Information M. Mortazavi Session Report - Page 48 9:00 a.m. 5. Port Lands Flood Protection (60% Design Stage Gate Status Approval D. Kusturin Update) Cover Sheet - Page 49 Presentation is attached as Appendix A to the Board Book 9:15 a.m. 6. Waterfront Toronto Priority Projects - Construction Update Information D. Kusturin Cover sheet - Page 50 Presentation is attached as Appendix B to the Board Book 9:30 a.m. 7. Motion to go into Closed Session Approval All Closed Session Agenda The Board will discuss items 8, 9 (a), (b), (c), (d) & (e) , 10, 11 and
    [Show full text]
  • Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project Assessment
    Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project Assessment Councillors Briefing January 22, 2009 inter-regional connectivity is the key to success 2 metrolinx: 15 top priorities ● On November 28, 2008 Regional Transportation Plan approved by Metrolinx Board ● Top 15 priorities for early implementation include: ¾ Viva Highway 7 and Yonge Street through York Region ¾ Spadina Subway extension to Vaughan Corporate Centre ¾ Yonge Subway extension to Richmond Hill Centre ¾ Sheppard/Finch LRT ¾ Scarborough RT replacement ¾ Eglinton Crosstown LRT 3 …transit city LRT plan 4 yonge subway – next steps TODAY 5 what’s important when planning this subway extension? You told us your top three priorities were: 1. Connections to other transit 2. Careful planning of existing neighbourhoods and future growth 3. Destinations, places to go and sensitivity to the local environment were tied for the third priority In addition, we need to address all the technical and operational requirements and costs 6 yonge subway at a crossroads ● The Yonge Subway is TTC’s most important asset ● Must preserve and protect existing Yonge line ridership ● Capacity of Yonge line to accommodate ridership growth a growing issue ● Extension of Yonge/Spadina lines matched by downstream capacity ● Three major issues: 1. Capacity of Yonge Subway line 2. Capacity of Yonge-Bloor Station 3. Sequence of events for expansion 7 yonge-university-spadina subway – peak hour volumes 8 yonge subway capacity: history ● Capacity of Yonge line an issue since early 1980s ● RTES study conclusions (2001) ¾
    [Show full text]
  • No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx
    2020 No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx Top100 Projects 2020 One Man Changes the Face of 2020’s Top 10 Top100 Projects — 2020 f not for one individual, this year’s Top100 may have looked An annual report inserted in familiar. ReNew Canada’s I When this year’s research process began, there was little change within this year’s Top 10, as many of the nation’s January/February 2020 issue megaprojects were still in progress. Significant progress has been made on all of the projects we saw grace the Top 10 in our report last year, but completion dates extend beyond the end of the MANAGING Andrew Macklin 2019 calendar year. EDITOR [email protected] Enter Matt Clark, Metrolinx’s Chief Capital Officer, who took GROUP over the position from Peter Zuk. You see, when Zuk was in charge Todd Latham PUBLISHER of publicly expressing capital budgets, particularly in the context of the GO Expansion project, he had done so by breaking down PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski the $13.5 billion spend by corridor. That breakdown led to the full expansion represented by as many as nine projects in the content ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIORDESIGN of the Top100. Clark does it differently. In the quarterly reports made public ASSOCIATE following Metrolinx board meetings, the capital projects for the Simran Chattha EDITOR GO Expansion are broken down into three allotments (on corridor, off corridor, and early works). The result? Six less GO Expansion CONTENT AND MARKETING Todd Westcott projects in the Top100, but two new projects in our Top 10 MANAGER including a new number one.
    [Show full text]
  • LRT EXTENSION STUDY Public Feedback Report from the Online Public Open House June 22 to July 31, 2020
    Feedback Report from Online Public Open House held June 22 to July 31, 2020 Page | 1 BRAMPTON LRT EXTENSION STUDY CITY OF BRAMPTON LRT EXTENSION STUDY Public Feedback Report from the Online Public Open House June 22 to July 31, 2020 _ _ ___ Feedback Report from Online Public Open House held June 22 to July 31, 2020 Page | 2 BRAMPTON LRT EXTENSION STUDY About This Report The City of Brampton is committed to informing and engaging the public on the LRT Extension Study. To help protect the health and safety of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic and following the advice of Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, the City held an Online Public Open House from June 22, 2020 to July 31, 2020. The City has identified an initial long list of LRT options and is recommending that a number of options be carried forward for further analysis. The purpose of the Online Public Open House was to present the evaluation of the long list LRT options and receive feedback from the public on the resulting short list. This report, prepared by the Community Engagement Facilitator Sue Cumming, MCIP RPP, Cumming+Company together with HDR Corporation, provides a summary with the verbatim public input that resulted from the Online Public Open House. The Appendix includes the Online Public Open House Boards. Contents 1. How was the Online Public Open House #1 Organized? .................................................. 3 2. What Was Heard .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Frequently Noted Key Messages on Overall LRT Extension Project…………………....5 2.2. Responses to the Draft Long List Evaluation Criteria…………...……………….………..6 2.3.
    [Show full text]