DOCSLIB.ORG

An Essay on Unmanned Aerial Systems Insurance and Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Essay on Unmanned Aerial Systems Insurance and Risk Assessment An Essay on Unmanned Aerial Systems Insurance and Risk Assessment Jason Knight Brendan Smith, Student Member, IEEE and YangQuan Chen, Senior Member, IEEE Southwestern Law School MESA Lab, University of California, Merced Los Angeles, California 90010 Merced, California 95343 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—UAV technology has begun to integrate into the local legislature. Finally, the policyholder chooses a well suited National Airspace (NAS), at an accelerated rate. Coupled with package and coverage ensues. Unfortunately, this model is not a high demand for civilian UAS applications and decreasing universal to all industries. However, this model may be adapted component prices, more UAS researchers, commercial operators, to the UAS sector. and manufacturers begin to fly. Despite a lack of government mandated insurance requirements and mission profiles deemed Insurance companies rely on a portfolio of risk to mitigate dull, dirty, and dangerous, the UAS industry is gaining mo- cost. Those policyholders engaged in risky activities or inex- mentum. However, as the UAV industry matures, unmanned perienced operators must meet higher certification standards aircraft will inevitably crash. In anticipation of these growing and pay higher premiums. Conversely, those who operate in pains, insurance carriers must be ready. Unmanned aircraft present a unique matrix of risk endemic to the challenges of a noticeably safer manner and have greater experience are flight in the NAS. Underwriters and actuaries will be able to rewarded with lower premiums and potentially better coverage. provide peace of mind to pilots and bystanders alike. Insurers A pool of diversified risk allows underwriters to organize must design policies to properly allocate liability and provide a and prioritize future clients. Insurance companies can then safety net. UAS-tailored coverage will identify and quantify the absorb automotive or marine accidents that lie within coverage unique characteristics of unmanned aircraft. Underwriters have constraints. Firms can then assess risk with some degree of just begun to adapt insurance products to suit the needs of the certainty based on historical data. However, in the aviation nascent sector. This analysis will outline the process of insuring industry, this pool is so small, that actuarial classes and UAS. Further, it will highlight how insurance companies should policyholder risk matrices are considerably less relevant [3]. cope with the dynamic forces within the UAV market. Risk management in the aviation industry is unique because I. INTRODUCTION of the endemic nature of flight. Insurance policies are generally written based on aircraft airworthiness; available accident UAS risk management is a large sector in flux. Though the data; area of operation and pilot certification. These factors FAA has not moved to impose minimum insurance require- are deceptively similar to actuarial classes in the automotive ments, underwriters are rushing to fill the void. Though UAS industry. However, unlike the relatively consistent variables risk assessment may seem trivial, the obvious risks of personal drivers face on the highway, flight conditions change every injury and property damage loom. Like manned aircraft, UAS time the propellers start to turn. Each mission profile should are sensitive and subtle instruments that carry hefty repair and be analyzed independently and within the aircraft envelope [4]. replace costs. Therefore, insurance companies must consider UAS to be comparable to small or ultra-light aircrafts. Since Another differentiation from other sectors is that the federal several factors make up the UAS risk matrix, underwriters will government does not generally require pilots and aircraft take into account who is liable for when a mission fails or owners to carry insurance. Though there is an exception, it causes injury. Problems should be initially divided into two will be discussed later in this paper. The rationale behind the categories of fault, Pilot-In-Command (PIC) and manufacturer lack of a federal insurance mandate is the stringent scheme for (hardware/software malfunction) liability. As the FAA and pilot certification and aircraft airworthiness as well as oversight local legislatures develop a concrete legal framework for these from air traffic control (ATC) at airports across the country. risks, the insurance industry must remain ready and flexible. Under FAA regulations, a pilot must complete a rigorous training regiment to obtain a pilot’s license [5].2 Subsequently, certification maintenance requires that a pilot who wishes to II. WHAT MAKES AVIATION INSURANCE DIFFERENT transport passengers must complete three takeoffs and three Aviation risk is not like other types of risk. Insurance landings every 90 days, in the same category, class and type in other sectors use actuaries1 to identify and manage risk. for the certification issued [7]. Furthermore, a pilot must For example, in the automotive industry, actuarial classes are maintain minimum health requirements for a biannual medical used to determine what level of coverage is necessary for a examination. prospective policyholder. Currently, automotive underwriters Aircraft airworthiness is also subject to strict scrutiny. Any use two classes, vehicle and driver, to determine coverage. defects that may affect performance of an aircraft must be Vehicle data points include the manufacturer, model and value. documented, reported and repaired for continued airworthiness Driver data points are comprised of gender and driving record [8]. Underwriters have responded to this rigid structure by among other factors [2]. An underwriter then plugs in the issuing policies with strict exclusions. Courts have held that respective client information and a tiered coverage package matrix is generated. The underwriter then applies relevant 2An applicant must complete a specified number of hours of ground school minimum coverage requirements, usually mandated by the or class room training for a certain type rating. The applicant must then complete the relevant written test for the rating. The applicant must then 1a person who compiles and analyzes statistics and uses them to calculate complete a specified number of hours of flight instruction and pass a practical insurance risks and premiums [1] flight exam to receive a certificate [6]. 978-1-4799-2280-2/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE TABLE I. AIR CARRIER -MINIMUM SINGLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY policies with exclusions that withhold coverage for accidents WITH 16 PASSENGERS caused by certification and airworthiness issues are valid $3,600,000 = [(16 passenger seats) × (:75)] × $300; 000 (Liability Per Occurrence) [9], [10]. Insurance firms enforce such exclusions and argue + $2; 000; 000 (property damage per occurrence) that forfeiture of coverage due to faulty pilot certification or airworthiness is not an exclusion. Instead, the coverage never = $5; 600; 000 Minimum Coverage Requirement existed in the first place [11]. TABLE II. AIR TAXI -MINIMUM SINGLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY WITH 16 Unmanned aerial vehicles and systems occupy an even PASSENGERS smaller pond in the risk pool. Currently, underwriters do not $900,000 = [(16passenger seats) × (:75)] × $100; 000 (Liability Per Occurrence) have a legal framework to rely on. Because so few UAS + $300,000 (non-passenger liability per occurrence) and UAV operators have approval to fly in the United States, + $100,000 (property damage per occurrence) insurance firms must innovate to accommodate them. = $1; 300; 000 Minimum Coverage Requirement So far, insurance firms that write policies for UAS rely on two methods to mitigate risk for pilots. The first method is to require the PIC to maintain a minimum private pilot’s to provide air transportation and who has control over the op- license (PPL) certification rating. The second is to require erational functions performed in providing the transportation” the PIC to attend a mandatory FAA private pilot ground [17]. As required by FAA CFR 205.5(a), “these requirements school, as to ensure education on the consequences of flying apply to bodily injury or property damage, resulting from the in the National Airspace (NAS) [12]. However, some speculate carrier’s operation or maintenance of aircraft in air transporta- that the FAA will require a baseline ground school for both tion. ” [16]. PICs and Visual Observers (VO) (individuals who are critical FAA minimum requirements are calculated based on to mission operation through communication with the PIC, commercial aircraft capability and capacity. Under 14 CFR but do not directly control the aircraft). However, until this 205.5(b), the FAA discriminates between aircraft that can requirement emerges, underwriters must rely on the existing transport 60 people or more then 18,000 pounds of cargo [16]. general aviation certification scheme. The minimum requirements for coverage is illustrated above Furthermore, insurance firms face a challenge for UAS in Table I. The FAA maintains a different scheme for air taxis aircraft airworthiness. The FAA requires that all airworthy [16]. An air taxi is an aircraft that transports passengers, prop- aircraft have a serial number [13], also known as a tail erty, or mail in small aircraft [18]. The minimum requirements number. The serial number allows manufacturers, pilots, and for air taxi coverage is illustrated above in Table II. the government to monitor accident data and reliability. This Although the manned aircraft scheme may not be directly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insurance Special Report 2018 by Kim Rosenlof Industry Players Outline Challenges, Opportunities
    SPECIAL report Insurance Special Report 2018 by Kim Rosenlof Industry players outline challenges, opportunities Keynote speaker Dr. Doris Höpke, a mem- ber of the Board of Management of Ger- man insurance giant Munich Reinsurance Company (Munich RE) since 2014, painted a cautiously optimistic picture of the U.S. general aviation insurance industry at the 2018 Aviation Insurance Association (AIA) conference held April 29 to May 1 in Austin, Texas. Höpke noted that while profitability remains a challenge in an environment where a judgment in excess of US$100 million can wipe out nearly 10 percent of aggregate annual premiums, new technologies and markets provide opportunities to return to profitability. JOHN A. MANFREDO “These days we are facing some chal- lenges that…could potentially change insurers can make a living on investment loss premium. This is an exposure show- that everybody adds value beyond capac- the entire business model of what we gains,” said Höpke. “This is in essence a ing that certainly the market cannot stand ity and beyond simply taking risks onto do,” said Höpke, “The biggest challenge misunderstanding of what insurance is on its own and it requires reinsurance to your balance sheet.” for us as a reinsurer is the [low] interest about. Our core is assessing and bearing transfer risk…But if historically the largest rate environment.” risk, and if we are not able to make a loss is 16 percent of the largest policy limit, New Insurance Markets: living on our underwriting results, there what about the remaining 84 percent? Cyber, Space, and Drones are many reasons to rethink how this This is capacity that is not needed.
    [Show full text]
  • 563-4101 Discount Medical Plan Organiza
    INSURANCE COMPANY NAME PHONE NUMBER INSURANCE COMPANY TYPE 20/20 EYECARE PLAN, INC (954) 563-4101 DISCOUNT MEDICAL PLAN ORGANIZATION 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (302) 252-2060 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURER 21ST SERVICES, LLC (612) 371-3008 LIFE EXPECTANCY PROVIDER 5 STAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (703) 299-5794 LIFE AND HEALTH INSURER A I CREDIT CORP. (201) 631-5400 PREMIUM FINANCE COMPANY A-S ENERGY, INC. (903) 509-7255 SERVICE WARRANTY ASSOCIATION A.A.L.D., INC. (212) 440-7878 RISK PURCHASING GROUP A.G.I.A., INC. (805) 566-9191 THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATOR AAA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (734) 591-6329 LIFE AND HEALTH INSURER AAFP INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. (816) 444-2644 THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATOR ABCO PREMIUM FINANCE, INC. (305) 461-2555 PREMIUM FINANCE COMPANY ACA ASSURANCE (603) 625-8577 FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETY ACA FINANCIAL GUARANTY CORPORATION (212) 375-2087 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURER ACA INTERNATIONAL (202) 966-3934 RISK PURCHASING GROUP ACACIA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (800) 745-6665 x87759 LIFE AND HEALTH INSURER ACC CLIENT SERVICE COMPANIES RISK PURCHASING GROUP, INC. (941) 746-5531 RISK PURCHASING GROUP ACCENDO INSURANCE COMPANY (801) 350-6505 LIFE AND HEALTH INSURER ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (919) 833-1600 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURER ACCESS ADMINISTRATORS, INC. (972) 915-3234 THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATOR ACCESS INSURANCE COMPANY (770) 234-3600 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURER ACCESS ONE CONSUMER HEALTH, INC. (888) 804-7000 DISCOUNT MEDICAL PLAN ORGANIZATION ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (517) 367-1457 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURER ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. (866) 234-6484 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURER ACCOUNTANTS INSURANCE PURCHASING GROUP ASSOCIATION (781) 449-7711 RISK PURCHASING GROUP ACCREDITED SURETY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Insurance in Aviation Finance Rod D
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 62 | Issue 2 Article 4 1996 Aspects of Insurance in Aviation Finance Rod D. Margo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Rod D. Margo, Aspects of Insurance in Aviation Finance, 62 J. Air L. & Com. 423 (1996) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol62/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. ASPECTS OF INSURANCE IN AVIATION FINANCE ROD D. MARGO* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 424 II. THE NATURE OF INSURANCE ................... 428 A. INSURABLE INTEREST ............................ 430 B. THE DUTY OF DISCLOSURE ...................... 430 1. Good Faith .................................. 430 2. Nondisclosure and Misrepresentation.......... 431 III. THE INTERNATIONAL AVIATION INSURANCE M A RKET ........................................... 433 IV. THE ROLE OF THE INSURANCE BROKER ...... 435 V. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE AND LETTERS OF UNDERTAKING ............................... 437 VI. TYPES OF COVERAGE ............................ 439 A. HULL INSURANCE ............................... 439 B. LIABILITY INSURANCE ............................ 442 1. PassengerLiability Insurance ................. 443 2. Third Party Liability Insurance ............... 444 C. WAR AND ALLIED PERILS INSURANCE ............ 445 VII. PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF FINAN CIERS ....................................... 449 A. PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF FINANCIERS UNDER A HULL POLICY ......................... 449 1. Additional Insured Endorsement .............. 450 2. Loss Payable Clause.......................... 450 * Member of the California and District of Columbia bars; Partner, Condon & Forsyth, Los Angeles; Lecturer in law, UCLA School of Law, Los Angeles. I have received helpful advice and comments from individuals too numerous to men- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduce Premium Subsidies on Buy-Up Coverage by 5 (Against a Loss of Revenue Caused by Low Prices, Low Yields Percentage Points
    58 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES • Reduce premium subsidies on buy-up coverage by 5 (against a loss of revenue caused by low prices, low yields percentage points. or a combination of both) or yield protection (for produc- tion losses only), all within the same policy. RMA also • Increase the government’s share on underwriting continues to pursue a number of avenues to increase pro- gains to 20 percent from 5 percent. gram participation among underserved States and com- • Reduce the face value premium on Catastrophic modities by working on declining yield issues and looking Crop Insurance (CAT) by 25 percent and charge an at discount programs for good producers who pose less administrative fee on CAT equal to the greater of risk. $300 or 25 percent of the (restated) CAT premium, subject to a maximum fee of $5,000. Insurance against Security-Related Risks In addition to these changes, the Farm Bill authorized Terrorism Risk Insurance the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to have the option of renegotiating the financial terms and condi- The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program (TRIP), autho- tions of the Standard Reinsurance Agreement with the rized under P.L. 107-297, helped stabilize the insurance crop insurance companies during FY 2010. If the FCIC industry during a time of significant transition follow- exercises this authority, it could result in more efficiency ing the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Initially, for risk sharing between the government and the crop in- TRIP was a three-year Federal program that provided surance companies. a system of shared public and private compensation for There are various types of insurance programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Insurance Walter C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Southern Methodist University Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 2 | Issue 2 Article 3 1931 Aviation Insurance Walter C. Crowdus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Walter C. Crowdus, Aviation Insurance, 2 J. Air L. & Com. 176 (1931) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol2/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. AVIATION INSURANCE* WALTER C. CROWDUSt INTRODUCTION Over three and a half centuries ago, in opening Queen Eliza- beth's first parliament, Sir Nicholas Bacon remarked, "Wise mer- chants, in every adventure of danger, pay part of the value of their cargo to have the rest insured." Since that time, insurance has become almost a universal necessity, and the foundation upon which industry of all kinds is built. The entrance of insurance into the field of aeronautics was, therefore, to be logically expected. As pioneer underwriters of unusual and hazardous risks (or, rather, gambles) Lloyds London were the first to make possible and to offer insurance for aviation. This was just prior to the opening of the World War in 1914. It had been ten years since man had first flown in a heavier-than-air machine, but in those few years the growth and development of aviation had made it neces- sary that the protection afforded by insurance become available.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Report
    OKLAHOMA 101ST ANNUAL REPORT & DIRECTORY OF INSURANCE AND RELATED COMPANIES OKLAHOMA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT|800.522.0071|405.521.2828|WWW.OID.OK.GOV KIM HOLLAND, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER The Honorable Brad Henry, Governor of Oklahoma The Honorable Chris Benge, Speaker of the House The Honorable Mike Morgan, President Pro Tempore The Honorable Glenn Coffee, Co-President Pro Tempore The Honorable Steve Burrage, State Auditor and Inspector I am pleased to present to you the 2007 Annual Report of the Oklahoma Insurance Department. This report is established by the provisions of Oklahoma Statutes Title 36 § 307 and summarizes the activities of the Oklahoma Insurance Department through the period ending Dec. 31, 2007. In addition to the required financial disclosures and listing of companies operating in Oklahoma, this report highlights the work of the Oklahoma Insurance Department on behalf of Oklahoma taxpayers. Sincerely yours, Kim Holland Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner The Oklahoma Insurance Department is accredited by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). To achieve this accreditation, the department must meet stringent national standards that demonstrate it effectively regulates insurance companies for solvency and market conduct. Commissioner Holland and the staff of the Oklahoma Insurance Department view accreditation by the NAIC as an important part of our commitment to the citizens of Oklahoma. Accreditation standards enable us to provide expanded consumer protections and to institute and maintain the highest standards
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Insurance (Aircraft Hull and Liability)
    Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE AVIATION INSURANCE Insurance Product Information Document Product: Aircraft Hull and Liability Insurance Policy Company: Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE This document provides a summary of the main cover and exclusions; it does not contain the full terms and conditions of the contract which can be found in your policy documentation. It is not personalised to your specific individual circumstances. The agreed sums insured, and limits are specified in your Policy Schedule. What is this type of insurance? Aircraft Insurance provides cover against the cost of potential risks arising from the use of aircraft, such as loss of or damage to the aircraft itself or your potential liability to others arising from the use of your aircraft. You can select which and what level of cover you require. WHAT IS INSURED? WHAT IS NOT INSURED? Physical loss of or damage to your aircraft up to the The applicable excess amount stated in your agreed value stated in your policy schedule up to the policy schedule. sum insured stated in your policy schedule – if Wear and tear, deterioration, or mechanical applicable. breakdown. Malicious damage to your aircraft (vandalism) etc. Loss of use of your aircraft or other Third party legal liability – Your legal liability to third consequential loss. parties for damages arising from the use of your Claims arising from War and Allied Perils, insured aircraft up to your selected liability limit as except as permitted by the policy. stated in your policy schedule. Claims arising from any hostile detonation of Passenger/baggage legal liability – Your legal any weapon of war employing atomic or liability to passengers and their baggage arising out nuclear fission and/or fusion or other like of the use of your aircraft and non-owned aircraft – reaction or radioactive force or matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitration Clauses in Aviation Insurance Contracts: Are They Fit for Purpose?
    Arbitration Clauses in Aviation Insurance Contracts: Are They Fit for Purpose? * Robert RICKETTS This article investigates whether the use of arbitration is a sufficiently appropriate forum to adjudicate disputes arising out of a number of important and unresolved issues that have arisen in the field of aviation insurance, particularly from the perspective of an aircraft financier. 1 THE CURRENT PRACTICE If a dispute arises with respect to an aviation insurance policy in the United Kingdom, more often than not the following clause is to be found: ‘This policy shall be construed in accordance with English Law and any dispute or difference between the insured and the insurer shall be submitted to arbitration in London in accordance with the statutory provisions for arbitration for the time being in force.’1 Indeed, as Margo on Aviation Insurance states, such arbitration clauses are ‘ubiquitous’2 in the aviation insurance market. The current rules governing written arbitration agreements are, as a matter of English law, governed by the Arbitration Act 1996 (the ‘Act’). The Act covers those arbitrations commenced on or after 31 January 1997, irrespective of when the underlying agreement was signed. The Act leaves much of the actual * The author is a partner in the law firm Holland & Knight (UK) LLP. The article is based on a talk he gave at the European Air Law Association Liability Conference in Munich in 2017. He would like to thank Tim Marland at Quadrant Chambers and one of the co-authors of Margo on Aviation Insurance, along with his partners John Pritchard and Randal Craft and John Toriello in New York and two colleagues, Giles Cornwall and Tim Barnett in London.
    [Show full text]
  • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS INSURANCE SECTOR General 1
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS INSURANCE SECTOR General 1. What is insurance? Insurance is a legal contract between two parties – an individual or entity who receives financial protection (referred to as the insured) and the insurance company that promises to compensate the losses (referred to as the insurer) in return for the money (premium) paid by the insured. In simple terms, insurance provides protection against loss. Basically, the concept of insurance is to spread the risk of an individual or entity among larger society. Insurance is a risk management mechanism wherein you transfer your risk to the insurance company by paying them the premium. 2. How does insurance work? When you buy an insurance policy, you make regular payments to the insurance company for the amount of risk cover that you seek. Insurance companies pool the money paid like this by individuals and entities and then use them to compensate for the losses and damages arising out of insured events. Though it may sound simple, insurance is a complex business. To understand insurance contracts, you need to know about its components, jargon and the terminologies used in the contract. Any individual or company can seek insurance from an insurance company, but the decision to provide insurance is at the discretion of the insurance company. The insurance company will evaluate the application to make a decision. Insurance companies may refuse to provide insurance to high risk applicants. 3. What is insurable interest? Insurable interest is the prerequisite for every insurance policy. A person or entity seeking insurance has an insurable interest in the subject matter when any damage or loss would result in financial hardship for that person or entity.
    [Show full text]
  • May 33 -- 6,6, 20192019 Grovegrove Parkpark Inninn Asheville,Asheville, Ncnc
    MAYMAY 33 -- 6,6, 20192019 GROVEGROVE PARKPARK INNINN ASHEVILLE,ASHEVILLE, NCNC THE place to make the connections that matter. The Aviation Insurance Association is THE place to make the connections that matter. In addition to the knowledge you will gain from the education sessions, the available networking opportunities are what truly makes this conference the place to be for those working in the aviation insurance industry. This is the one time per year when all facets of the industry are together at once. It is your opportunity to renew old acquaintances, build new relationships and your business. The 2019 AIA Annual Conference is the best venue to trade experiences, create busi- ness partnerships, and discuss the current state of the industry from each segment of the association. Network with your peers over cocktails during the opening reception and learn what is to come for the aviation insurance industry during the general edu- cation sessions. Register now for the 2019 AIA Annual Conference, and you will be sure to see that AIA continues to be THE conference for those in the aviation insurance industry! SCHEDULE AT A GLANCE FRIDAY, MAY 3 1-5 p.m. Continuing Legal Education sessions 1-2 p.m. NTSB Factual Report: Admissible or Not · W. Ashby Underhill, Coquina Law Group 2-3 p.m. Bad Faith – The Case for a Prompt Investigation and Expeditious Settlement Offer · Elizabeth Vasseur Browne, Cooling & Herbers · Michele Sears, Wilson Elser 3-4 p.m. Lessons from the Amazon: In-Country Emergency Response in the Foreign Air Accident/Incident Case · Robert Torricella, Torricella Law PLLC 4-5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Risk: a Continuing Threat
    TERRORISM RISK: A CONTINUING THREAT Impacts for Property/Casualty Insurers SEPTEMBER 2012 Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU President & Economist (212) 346-5520 [email protected] Claire Wilkinson (917) 459-6497 [email protected] Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 212.346.5500 INTRODUCTION International terrorism—starting with the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, and followed by the 2002 Bali bombings, the 2004 Russian aircraft and Madrid train bombings, the London transportation bombings of 2005 and the Mumbai bombings of 2008—had a profound influence on the 2001 to 2010 decade. Then came 2011, a landmark year, which simultaneously saw the death of al-Qaida founder Osama bin Laden and the 10-year anniversary of September 11. The changing nature of the global terrorism threat is highlighted in a report from the U.S. Department of State, which notes that the total number of worldwide terrorist attacks in 2011 was more than 10,000 in 70 countries, resulting in more than 12,500 deaths.1 While large, that figure represents a drop of 12 percent from 2010. More than 75 percent of the world’s attacks occurred in South Asia and the Near East, and 85 percent of attacks in these regions occurred in just three countries: Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. Bin Laden was not the only top al-Qaida leader removed from the battlefield in 2011. Other key terrorist figures killed in 2011 included: Ilyas Kashmiri, a terrorist operative in South Asia; Harun Fazul, an architect of the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania; Atiya Abdul Rahman, al-Qaida’s second-in- command after bin Laden’s death; and Anwar al-Aulaqi, al-Qaida’s chief of external operations in the Arabian Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter February 2015
    Aviation and aerospace Newsletter February 2015 Contents Canadian Supreme Court upholds Canadian Supreme Court upholds exclusivity of Montreal Convention in exclusivity of Montreal Convention in context of language rights context of language rights Page 1 On 28 October 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada issued Dangerous goods and the evolving regulatory environment to ensure the a 5-2 decision dismissing an action brought by passengers safety of their carriage and avowed francophones Michel and Lynda Thibodeau for Page 5 Air Canada’s failure to provide services in French as well Regulation (EC) 261/2004 and as English on several international flights in violation of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – recent developments Canada’s Official Languages Act (the “OLA”). The decision Page 9 addressed a tension between Canadian domestic law, Australian court dismisses passenger which provides remedies for language rights violations, claim brought 22 years after the event Page 12 and the Montreal Convention (to which Canada is a state party), which does not. Ultimately, the majority concluded, The Cape Town Convention and repossession insurance correctly in our opinion, that Canada’s obligations under Page 14 the Montreal Convention trumped the OLA with respect to AVN67B/C: Observations from the international transportation governed by the Convention. lessor/lender perspective Page 19 Canada’s Official Languages Act Pure mental harm arising from The OLA is a Canadian federal statute aimed at ensuring “respect for damage by aircraft – proposed English and French as the official languages of Canada” and the “equality changes to laws in Australia of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all federal Page 26 institutions….” OLA § 2(a).
    [Show full text]