DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Barbara County Parks Water System Upgrades at Lake Cachuma Campground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Santa Barbara County Parks Water System Upgrades at Lake Cachuma Campground Draft Environmental Assessment Santa Barbara County Parks Water System Upgrades at Lake Cachuma Campground EA-09-173 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region South-Central California Area Office Fresno, California March 2010 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents Section 1 Purpose and Need for Action ....................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scope ..................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Potential Issues...................................................................................... 2 Section 2 Alternatives Including the Proposed Action ............................... 4 2.1 No Action Alternative ........................................................................... 4 2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Water Treatment Facility Modifications ....................................... 6 2.2.2 Water Storage Tank Construction Activities ................................ 7 2.2.3 Water Distribution Improvements ................................................. 8 2.2.4 Environmental Commitments ....................................................... 9 Section 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ..... 10 3.1 Water Resources ................................................................................. 10 3.1.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 10 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 11 3.1.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 11 3.1.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 11 3.2 Recreation ........................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 11 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 12 3.2.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 12 3.2.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 12 3.3 Land Use ............................................................................................. 12 3.3.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 12 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 12 3.3.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 12 3.3.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 12 3.4 Biological Resources .......................................................................... 13 3.4.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 13 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 14 3.4.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 14 3.4.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 14 3.5 Cultural Resources .............................................................................. 15 3.5.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 15 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 19 3.5.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 19 3.5.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 19 3.6 Indian Trust Assets ............................................................................. 20 3.6.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 20 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 20 3.6.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 20 3.6.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 20 3.7 Environmental Justice ......................................................................... 21 3.7.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 21 iii 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 21 3.7.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 21 3.7.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 21 3.8 Socioeconomic Resources .................................................................. 21 3.8.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 21 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 22 3.8.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 22 3.8.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 22 3.9 Air Quality .......................................................................................... 22 3.9.1 Affected Environment ................................................................. 22 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 23 3.9.2.1 No Action ............................................................................ 23 3.9.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................. 24 3.10 Global Climate Change ....................................................................... 24 3.10.1 Affected Environment ............................................................. 24 3.10.2 Environmental Consequences.................................................. 25 3.10.2.1 No Action .......................................................................... 25 3.10.2.2 Proposed Action ................................................................ 25 3.11 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................ 25 Section 4 Consultation and Coordination ................................................. 26 4.1 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 USC § 661 et seq.) .............. 26 4.2 Endangered Species Act (16 USC § 1531 et seq.) .............................. 26 4.3 National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC § 470 et seq.) ............... 27 4.4 Indian Trust Assets ............................................................................. 27 4.5 Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC § 703 et seq.) ............................ 27 4.6 Executive Order 11988 – Floodplain Management and Executive Order 11990-Protection of Wetlands .................................................. 28 4.7 Clean Air Act (42 USC § 7506 (C)) ................................................... 28 4.8 Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311 et seq.) .......................................... 28 Section 5 List of Preparers and Reviewers ............................................... 29 Section 6 References .................................................................................... 29 List of Tables and Figures Figure 1-1 Lake Cachuma Campground (view looking north) .............................. 2 Figure 1-2 Lake Cachuma Proposed Action Location ........................................... 3 Figure 2-1 Location of new Water Treatment Facility .......................................... 7 Figure 2-2 Existing water reservoir and location of new water tank ..................... 8 Table 2-1 Environmental Protection Measures ...................................................... 9 Table 3-1 Santa Barbara County Demographics ................................................. 21 Table 3-2 Santa Barbara County Economic Characteristics ................................ 21 Table 3-3 Santa Barbara County Attainment Status ............................................ 23 Table 3-4 Calculated Proposed Action Emissions ............................................... 24 iv Appendices Appendix A Proposed Action Designs Appendix B Tree Protection and Replacement Program Appendix C Environmental Documents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ADA American with Disabilities Act Agency Santa Barbara County Water Agency APE Area of Potential Effect ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CAA Clean Air Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations Challenge Grant Water Marketing and Efficiency Challenge grant program COMB Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board County Santa Barbara County CO2 Carbon dioxide CWA Clean Water Act EA Environmental Assessment EPA Environmental Protection Agency FWCA Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ESA Endangered Species Act GHG greenhouse gases ITA Indian Trust Asset MBTA Migratory Bird
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5.1 Hydrology, Water Supply, and Water Quality
    5.1 HYDROLOGY, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY 5.1.1 OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY The proposed Master Plan Update will provide for additional water infrastructure facilities for the City of Solvang (City). The analysis of the proposed Master Plan Update was divided into potential construction and operational impacts to the surface and groundwater hydrology, the water supply, and water quality of the Santa Ynez River. The Master Plan Update proposes that the Santa Ynez River be the primary source of water for the City. The City will be required to obtain and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Therefore, the proposed Master Plan Update impacts to water quality during construction would be less than significant (Class III). The proposed Master Plan Update impacts to surface water hydrology, groundwater hydrology, water rights, and water supplies during construction would be less than significant (Class III). Operation of the proposed wells identified in the Master Plan Update would result in minimal reductions in flows along the Santa Ynez River at the Alisal Bridge compared to baseline conditions. Surface water quantity and quality along the Santa Ynez River would be consistent with historic measurements at the Lompoc Narrows under baseline conditions and under the proposed Master Plan Update. Water right users along the Santa Ynez River downstream of Bradbury Dam to the Highway 101 Bridge in Buellton would receive their entire water right entitlement from the riparian groundwater basins and the Cachuma Project. Therefore, potential cumulative water right impacts would be less than significant (Class III).
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ynez Annual Report
    FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 Northern California Southern California Arizona Colorado Oregon FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 CARLSBAD, COVINA, AND SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA CENTENNIAL, COLORADO MEDFORD, OREGON 1126-13 April 24, 2020 San Rafael Board of Directors Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District P.O. Box 719 Santa Ynez, California 93460 Re: Forty-Second Annual Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, 2019-2020 Dear Board Members: Transmitted herewith is our Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District for 2019-2020. This, the Forty-Second Annual Report, presents the required and pertinent information for the Board of Directors to make necessary determinations for levying groundwater charges upon the production of groundwater from water-producing facilities (water wells) within the District. As such, it provides information on the status of the groundwater and surface water supplies, as well as the annual production of groundwater from within the District. Sincerely, Oliver S. Page OSP:rrk Enclosures TABLES OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1. Historical Background 1 1.2. Description of the District 2 1.3. Report Summary 3 1.4. Findings and Determinations 7 1.5. Sources of Information 8 2.0 Groundwater Charges 9 2.1. Revenues 10 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Locations Contact Information
    LOCATIONS CONTACT INFORMATION Aerial Services Aeronautic Pictures Craig Schmitman 805-985-2320 http://aeronauticpictures.com/ P.O. Box 1748, Ojai, CA 93024 Film, video and still photography aerial and location services. Stock footage and photos too. We work air-to-anywhere. Demo reel on our website. Aspen Helicopters 805-985-5416 Fax: 805-985-7327 [email protected] http://www.aspenhelo.com/ Crop spraying and aerial tours. Credits: Richmond Prods. FAA Federal Aviation Administration Terri Rector FAA Federal Aviation Administration 10 Burns Place Goleta, CA 93117 805-681-0534, x3102 [email protected] Regional Flight Standards: (Van Nuys) 818-904-6291 Platinum Helicopters, Inc Skybound Charter, LLC Phone: 805-484-6900 Fax: 805-484-6939 Camarillo, Ca. 93010 [email protected] www.platinumhelicopters.com Movie/Television Camera Flight Operations, Aerial Film Productions, Business/VIP Transportation throughout Southern California, Arizona, Nevada. Aerial Photography, Aerial Survey, Private Tours/Sightseeing, Geological Survey. Remote-i Rhandal Sayat - Director of Photography 805-681-7314 [email protected] http://www.remotei.com/ 81 David Love Place, Goleta, CA 93117 Remote Aerial Photography, videography & cinematography services, and camera mount systems. Santa Barbara Biplane Tours Jay Farbman - Marketing Director 805-453-8320 [email protected] http://www.sbbiplane.com/ 406 A Moffett, Santa Barbara, CA 93117 Signature Flight Support Devin Madgett 805-967-5608 Fax: 805-967-5781 515 Marxmiller Rd, Goleta, CA 93117 [email protected] http://www.signatureflight.com/ Helicopter and fixed wing. Hangar storage 6am-10pm. After hours service available. Spitfire Aviation Flight School 805-967-4373 [email protected] 300 Moffett Place, Goleta, CA, 93117 Flights for still photography or filming purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 53048 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 227 1 Wednesday, November 24, 1982 / Proposed Rules
    53048 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 227 1 Wednesday, November 24, 1982 / Proposed Rules prescribed by the Secretary, the terms the Department reviews the executed DATE: Written comments must be and conditions upon which the mortgage loan documents in accordance with the received by January 10, 1983. will be insured. procedure set forth in § 200.163, if the ADDRESS: Send written comments to: (b) Except as set forth in § 200.164(f), documents are acceptable the loan is Chief, Regulations and Procedures commitments are not issued by HUD endorsed. Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco under the single family Program of and Firearms, P.O. Box 385, Washington, PART 237-AMENDED] Direct Endorsement. Under this Program DC 20044-0385, Attention: Notice No. the Department reviews the executed 14. Part 237 is amended by revising 435. loan documents in accordance with the § 237.5 to read as follows: procedure set forth in § 200.163, and if Copies of the petition, the proposed the documents are acceptable the loan is § 237.5 Cross-reference. regulations, the appropriate maps, and written comments will be available for endorsed.. 11. Part To be eligible for insurance under this 203 would be amended by public inspection during normal subpart, a mortgage shall meet all of the business hours at: ATF Reading Room, revising § 203.255 to redd as follows: eligibility requirements for insurance Room 4405, Federal Building, 12th and § 203.255 Insurance of mortgage. under § § 203.1 et seq. (Part 203, Subpart Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, A) of this chapter; § § 220.1 et seq. (Part (a) Upon compliance with a D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara's Gibraltar
    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities FONSI-12-086 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation January 2016 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California Draft FONSI-12-086 Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities _____________ Prepared by: Stacy L. Holt Date Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Ned M. Gruenhagen Date Wildlife Biologist or Biology Technician _____________ Concurred by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Approved by: Michael P. Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager Draft FONSI-12-086 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that executing 5- and 40- year Warren Act contracts with the City of Santa Barbara (City) is not a major federal action that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment and an environmental impact statement is not required.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.3 Fisheries Resources
    5.3 FISHERIES RESOURCES 5.3.1 OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY This section identifies the fisheries resources within the project areas proposed by the proposed Master Plan Update including new well installation and water treatment plant construction, and assesses the potential impacts of the proposed Master Plan Update on fisheries resources. The new well site locations A and B proposed by the Master Plan Update are largely natural settings along the Santa Ynez River. In addition, the proposed treatment plant is located in a partially developed area and supports disturbed vegetation with no direct connection to the river. The proposed Master Plan Update would minimize construction related impacts to surface waters through implementation of mitigation measures and incorporation of a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to protect water quality. Construction related impacts to fisheries resources would be less than significant (Class II). No significant impacts to listed special-status fish species, public trust fisheries resources, and associated fisheries habitat would occur because in the proposed Master Plan Update, potential impacts of these resources are avoided through the combination of project design features and mitigation measures. Impacts would be less than significant (Class II). Residual cumulative impacts associated with ongoing operation and maintenance of the proposed new wells would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation and the ongoing coordinated regional effort to implement an integrated approach to water right management that protects the public trust fisheries resources, specifically O. mykiss, along the Santa Ynez River (Class II). 5.3.2 DATA SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY Available literature and data sources were consulted to evaluate the fisheries resources found or potentially found within the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Flood Control
    FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Prepared for Winter Storms? SUMMARY The Flood Control and Water Conservation District, part of the County Public Works Department, manages the waterways and storage basins in Santa Barbara County. The District deals with emergencies on a regular basis, as winter rains often generate violent flows in the County’s creeks and rivers. The Grand Jury investigated the District’s flood control program to assess its effectiveness in protecting the County from the effects of these flows. The Grand Jury found that the Flood Control and Water Conservation District has a well-planned, proactive, and comprehensive program of annual maintenance and capital improvement projects to prevent flood damage during the winter rains. The Grand Jury also found a well-planned, tested emergency response capability for occasions when heavy flows do occur. The major dams in the County, Bradbury and Twitchell, serve a flood control role as well as forming part of the water conservation system. The dams are under close supervision by Federal and State agencies and have been seismically reinforced. The Grand Jury visited both Bradbury and Twitchell dams and found them under the control of experienced and knowledgeable operators. The Santa Maria levee, which protects the City of Santa Maria and the greater Santa Maria Valley from storm waters in the Santa Maria River, had a major failure in 1998 and is at risk of failing again. Although the District is working proactively to minimize this risk through interim measures, an engineering study indicates that a permanent reinforcement of the levee will cost over $38 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Statements
    MISSION STATEMENTS DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The Mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. CONSULTANT: URS CORPORATION 1333 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612-1924 CONTRACT NUMBER: 01CS20210H CACHUMA LAKE Draft Resource Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement June 2008 Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region South Central California Office CACHUMA LAKE Draft Resource Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region Sacramento, California South-Central California Area Office 1243 “N” Street Fresno, California 93721-1813 (559) 487-5116 June 2008 Executive Summary The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) developed the Cachuma Lake Resource Management Plan (RMP) to establish management objectives, guidelines, and actions for the Cachuma Lake Recreation Area (Plan Area). The Plan Area encompasses approximately 9,250 acres, including Cachuma Lake (3,043 acres at full level) and the surrounding shores and rugged hillsides. Santa Barbara County Parks Department manages the Plan Area pursuant to a contract between Reclamation and the County. Most of the recreational facilities at the lake are located in a 375-acre County Park on the south side of the lake. Facilities include campsites, general store, a marina and launch ramp, bait and tackle shop, amphitheater, trailer storage yard, recreational vehicle campsites, Nature Center, County Park Ranger Station, family center, swimming pools, and snack shop.
    [Show full text]
  • The 43Rd Annual Engineering and Survey Report on Water Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water
    FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2020-2021 April 21, 2021 Northern California Southern California Arizona Colorado Oregon FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2020-2021 April 21, 2021 CARLSBAD, COVINA, AND SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA CENTENNIAL, COLORADO MEDFORD, OREGON INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1126-13 April 21, 2021 San Rafael Board of Directors Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District P.O. Box 719 Santa Ynez, California 93460 Re: Forty-Third Annual Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, 2020-2021 Dear Board Members: Transmitted herewith is our Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District for 2020-2021. This, the Forty-Third Annual Report, presents the required and pertinent information for the Board of Directors to make necessary determinations for levying groundwater charges upon the production of groundwater from water-producing facilities (water wells) within the District. As such, it provides information on the status of the groundwater and surface water supplies, as well as the annual production of groundwater from within the District. Sincerely, Oliver S. Page OSP:rrk Enclosures INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLES OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Executive Summary 1 1.1. Historical Background 1 1.2. Description of the District 2 1.3. Report Summary 3 1.4. Findings 9 1.5. Sources of Information 10 2.0 GroundWater Charges 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cachuma Project, California
    Cachuma Project Thomas A. Latousek Bureau of Reclamation 1995 Table of Contents The Cachuma Project...........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................4 Authorization...........................................................6 Construction History .....................................................8 Post-Construction History................................................14 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Manuscripts and Archival Collections.......................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Books ................................................................21 Articles...............................................................21 Interviews.............................................................21 Index ......................................................................23 1 The Cachuma Project The Cachuma Project, proclaimed by Commissioner Michael Straus in 1949 as "Reclamation's first Seacoast
    [Show full text]
  • WY2017 ANNUAL MONITORING SUMMARY for the BIOLOGICAL OPINION for THE
    WY2017 ANNUAL MONITORING SUMMARY for THE BIOLOGICAL OPINION FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CACHUMA PROJECT ON THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: CACHUMA OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BOARD FISHERIES DIVISION CONSISTENT WITH REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE 2000 CACHUMA PROJECT BIOLOGICAL OPINION JUNE 22, 2019 DISCLAIMER The Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board (COMB), a Joint Powers Authority under California Government Code section 6500 et seq., and its member agencies, supply this Annual Monitoring Summary ("Report"), including all of its data, summaries, figures, tables, photographs, charts, analyses, results, conclusions and recommendations, "as is," with no warranties either express or implied made regarding the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, legality, reliability or usefulness of the information in the Report. The user of the contents of the Report assumes all responsibilities on its usage and for verifying the completeness and accuracy of the Report for both critical and non- critical uses and applications. In no event will COMB or its member agencies be in any way held liable to the user or any third party who uses this Report or any derivatives, products or services arising from this Report, for any damages, whether direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary or consequential. This disclaimer applies to both isolated and aggregated uses of the contents of the Report. WY2017 Annual Monitoring Summary Page i 7/22/19 Executive Summary The WY2017 Annual Monitoring Summary (AMS) presents the data and summarizes the results of monitoring Southern California steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, O. mykiss) and water quality conditions in the Lower Santa Ynez River (LSYR) below Bradbury Dam during Water Year 2017 (WY2017, 10/1/16 – 9/30/17).
    [Show full text]
  • REGULAR MEETING of CACHUMA OPERATION and MAINTENANCE BOARD Held at 3301 Laurel Canyon Road Santa Barbara, CA 93105 ______
    REGULAR MEETING OF CACHUMA OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BOARD held at 3301 Laurel Canyon Road Santa Barbara, CA 93105 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Monday, September 23, 2019 1:00 PM AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Public may address the Board on any subject matter not on the agenda and within the Board’s jurisdiction. See “Notice to the Public” below. Please make your comments from the podium once acknowledged by the President of the Board.) 3. CONSENT AGENDA (All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and will be approved or rejected in a single motion. Any item placed on the Consent Agenda may be removed and placed on the Regular Agenda for discussion and possible action upon the request of any Board Member.) Action: Recommend Approval of Consent Agenda by motion and roll call vote of the Board: a. Minutes of August 26, 2019 Regular Board Meeting b. Investment of Funds Financial Reports Investment Reports c. Review of Paid Claims 4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM BOARD COMMITTEES Receive verbal information regarding the following committee meetings: Special Fisheries Committee Meeting – September 12, 2019 5. CACHUMA PROJECT WARREN ACT TRUST FUND / RENEWAL FUND 2019-2020 ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM PLANS - SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BETTERMENT FUND USE OF FUNDS Action: Recommend approval by motion and roll call vote of the Board a. Approval of Program Expenditures – Warren Act Trust Fund for FY 2019-2020 b. Approval of Program Expenditures - Santa Barbara County Water Agency’s Betterment Fund for FY 2019-20 6. RESOLUTION NO. 701 – FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT QUIOTA CREEK CROSSING NO.
    [Show full text]