DOCSLIB.ORG

Mission Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mission Statements MISSION STATEMENTS DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The Mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. CONSULTANT: URS CORPORATION 1333 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612-1924 CONTRACT NUMBER: 01CS20210H CACHUMA LAKE Draft Resource Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement June 2008 Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region South Central California Office CACHUMA LAKE Draft Resource Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region Sacramento, California South-Central California Area Office 1243 “N” Street Fresno, California 93721-1813 (559) 487-5116 June 2008 Executive Summary The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) developed the Cachuma Lake Resource Management Plan (RMP) to establish management objectives, guidelines, and actions for the Cachuma Lake Recreation Area (Plan Area). The Plan Area encompasses approximately 9,250 acres, including Cachuma Lake (3,043 acres at full level) and the surrounding shores and rugged hillsides. Santa Barbara County Parks Department manages the Plan Area pursuant to a contract between Reclamation and the County. Most of the recreational facilities at the lake are located in a 375-acre County Park on the south side of the lake. Facilities include campsites, general store, a marina and launch ramp, bait and tackle shop, amphitheater, trailer storage yard, recreational vehicle campsites, Nature Center, County Park Ranger Station, family center, swimming pools, and snack shop. The north side of the lake consists of open space that is leased for grazing and permitted equestrian use. The open space area is closed to general public access. The RMP is a long-term plan that will guide future actions in the Plan Area and is based on a comprehensive inventory of environmental resources and facilities and input from local, state, and federal agencies, Santa Barbara County, and the general public. The primary emphasis of the RMP is to protect water quality, water supply, and natural resources, while enhancing recreational uses in the Plan Area. The recreational uses must be compatible with the primary obligation to operate the reservoir for storage and delivery of high-quality water. The development of the RMP is based upon authorities provided by Congress through the Reclamation Act, Federal Water Project Recreation Act, Reclamation Recreation Management Act, and applicable federal agency and United States Department of the Interior policies. The purpose of the RMP is to provide a program and set of policy guidelines necessary to encourage orderly use, development, and management of the surrounding lands. The RMP will provide outdoor recreational opportunities, enhanced by Cachuma Lake and its shoreline, compatible with the surrounding scenic, environmental, and cultural resources. The planning process for the Cachuma Lake RMP involves the integration of issues, opportunities and constraints, management actions, and management zones. It follows the guidance of federal planning mandates and proposed actions that balance recreation opportunities with natural and cultural resource stewardship. The following are the basic elements of the planning process: • Define the overall goals and objectives. • Describe the resource categories that group the issues. • Identify the issues, opportunities, and constraints. • Determine management actions to address the issues. • Define the management zones for Cachuma Lake. The environmental impacts of the RMP are assessed in a programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that has been included as part of this joint RMP/EIS document. The environmental review focuses on the potential for management actions to cause adverse or beneficial environmental impacts to natural and cultural resources such as water quality, endangered species, and historic resources. \\S021EMC2\_XDRIVES\X_ENV\_PERMIT\BUREC\CACHUMA RMP\DRAFT RMP\_PUBLIC DRAFT\TEXT_051608.DOC ES-1 Executive Summary Three planning alternatives were formulated to address the issues, opportunities, and constraints in the Plan Area. The No Action and two action alternatives are as follows: • No Action (Alternative 1)—This alternative manages land and activities with the continuation of current management practice. • Enhanced Recreation (Alternative 2)—This alternative balances natural resource protection and recreation opportunities. • Expanded Recreation (Alternative 3)—This alternative emphasizes expanded recreation opportunities. Under the No Action Alternative, current resource and recreation management direction and practices for the Plan Area would continue unchanged. However, some infrastructure improvements would be implemented that are common to all the alternatives. The No Action Alternative provides the benchmark for making comparisons in the EIS between possible future changes under Alternatives 2 and 3. The objective of Alternative 2 is to enhance current recreational uses and public access in the Plan Area to attract more visitors and increase recreational opportunities, while protecting natural resources with new or modified land and recreation management practices. These activities propose upgrades and improvements for many of the Plan Area’s existing facilities and utilities. Alternative 3 would expand recreational uses and public access by implementing new or modified land and recreation management practices. This alternative is included to demonstrate a scenario in which recreational uses in the Plan Area are substantially expanded while meeting the RMP goals for protection of natural resources to the extent feasible. Alternative 3 includes all of the management actions proposed for Alternative 2 as well as swimming. Section 3, Existing Conditions, describes features that could be affected by the alternatives. Other topics such as climate and air quality are addressed to provide context, but less detail is provided because impacts to these resources would be less noticeable. Much of the data collected to describe the existing environment are included in Geographic Information System format. Figures show areas with sensitive resources (i.e., biology and land use), hazard potential (i.e., erosion and geological hazards), and other conditions. These figures and the impact analyses provided in Section 4 are the basis of constraint analysis that would guide any plans for future development within the planning horizon. Section 4, Environmental Consequences, describes the impacts of implementing the two action alternatives as well as the No Action Alternative. Future actions that might result in site-specific impacts will be addressed in project-specific plans and environmental documentation as they arise. Where possible, Best Management Practices (BMPs) and avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures are provided to reduce the severity of each impact. All impacts resulting from the No Action Alternative would be addressed through the implementation of BMPs, which would be subject to an environmental review and possible mitigation in subsequent project-specific environmental documents. Each subpart of Section 4 identifies impact thresholds for the action alternatives and, where applicable, discusses impact methodology. Thresholds are generally expressed as follows: \\S021EMC2\_XDRIVES\X_ENV\_PERMIT\BUREC\CACHUMA RMP\DRAFT RMP\_PUBLIC DRAFT\TEXT_051608.DOC ES-2 Executive Summary • Beneficial Impact: This impact category would occur when an activity could result in the elimination, reduction, or resolution of a conflict. • No Impact: This impact category would occur if an activity would result in no change over the existing condition. • Minor Adverse Impact: This impact category would occur if an activity would result in deterioration or in a conflict. • Major Adverse Impact: This impact category would occur if an activity would result in a dramatic deterioration or a severe conflict. Then, the impacts common to all alternatives are discussed, followed by impacts unique to each alternative, and then an impact summary and mitigation measures if applicable. Cumulative impacts are discussed at the end of each resource topic where applicable. The impacts of each alternative to each resource topic are summarized in Table S-1. In some cases, a range of impact thresholds is indicated. The Cachuma Lake RMP/EIS is a program document and, therefore, not site-specific. Additionally, some impacts may vary depending on season. One example is for visitor access, where the effects of increased visitation on circulation depend on the season and time of travel to and from the Plan Area, resulting in a range of impacts. All mitigation measures reduce impact thresholds for the action alternatives to between minor adverse impact and no impact. Table S-1 Impacts Summary Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Impact Impact Impact After Impact Impact After Impacts to Resources Magnitude Magnitude Mit. Magnitude Mit. WATER RESOURCES WQ-1: Pollutants due to motorized Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor vehicle emissions WQ-2: Erosion and turbidity due to construction/ maintenance of facilities,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5.1 Hydrology, Water Supply, and Water Quality
    5.1 HYDROLOGY, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY 5.1.1 OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY The proposed Master Plan Update will provide for additional water infrastructure facilities for the City of Solvang (City). The analysis of the proposed Master Plan Update was divided into potential construction and operational impacts to the surface and groundwater hydrology, the water supply, and water quality of the Santa Ynez River. The Master Plan Update proposes that the Santa Ynez River be the primary source of water for the City. The City will be required to obtain and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Therefore, the proposed Master Plan Update impacts to water quality during construction would be less than significant (Class III). The proposed Master Plan Update impacts to surface water hydrology, groundwater hydrology, water rights, and water supplies during construction would be less than significant (Class III). Operation of the proposed wells identified in the Master Plan Update would result in minimal reductions in flows along the Santa Ynez River at the Alisal Bridge compared to baseline conditions. Surface water quantity and quality along the Santa Ynez River would be consistent with historic measurements at the Lompoc Narrows under baseline conditions and under the proposed Master Plan Update. Water right users along the Santa Ynez River downstream of Bradbury Dam to the Highway 101 Bridge in Buellton would receive their entire water right entitlement from the riparian groundwater basins and the Cachuma Project. Therefore, potential cumulative water right impacts would be less than significant (Class III).
    [Show full text]
  • Historic P U B Lic W Ork S P Roje Cts on the Ce N Tra L
    SHTOIRICHISTORIC SHTOIRIC P U B LIC W ORK S P ROJE TSCP ROJE CTS P ROJE TSC ON THE CE N TRA L OCA STCOA ST OCA ST Compiled by Douglas Pike, P.E. Printing Contributed by: Table of Contents Significant Transportation P rojects......2 El Camino Real................................................... 2 US Route 101...................................................... 3 California State Route 1...................................... 6 The Stone Arch Bridge ..................................... 11 Cold Spring Canyon Arch Bridge..................... 12 Significant W ater P rojects...................14 First Dams and Reservoirs................................ 14 First Water Company........................................ 14 Cold Spring Tunnel........................................... 15 Mission Tunnel ................................................. 16 Gibraltar Dam ................................................... 16 Central Coast Conduit....................................... 18 Water Reclamation In Santa Maria Valley....... 23 Twitchell Dam & Reservoir.............................. 24 Santa Maria Levee ............................................ 26 Nacimiento Water Project................................. 28 M iscellaneous P rojects of Interest.......30 Avila Pier .......................................................... 30 Stearns Wharf.................................................... 32 San Luis Obispo (Port Harford) Lighthouse..... 34 Point Conception Lighthouse............................ 35 Piedras Blancas Light ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr. Diana L.
    [Show full text]
  • 30-Mile Studio Zone Map N S U G Viejo E
    David Rd Banducci Rd S d Horse Thief o R d 33 r Rd a e Golf & Country Club 58 14 L iv 5 e ak g R e 99 d ld R v d O Mojave l Rid B r 166 Maricopa Maricopa Hwy Airport y d le t 166 i R 166 e Tehachapi Mountains C e e h in a Rd i m W ek Mojave n y SAN LUIS OBISPO e r Cr a ld o l O f i C l a COUNTY C Pine Cyn Rd 58 North Edwards d R yn 58 d C R d t o e o u S nw o sq o da Boron u tt p o L a e C R k T d e d R n 166 14 o y n a Backus Rd d I C r y R d w d o v d s l R in is d l g Hw R B R A F s R n i r n o a o n r t r h i California o e d il KERN r t l k p R an c r i d e s Aliso Park S i e d Aqueduct m p Cerr a S P R o c w l r en Rd l o Edwards n h T o l 58 e Noro a - c l COUNTY i Hi B L e s r e AFB v i st W e nk i a Foothill Rd K Rd j p l o ey a M h 5 c Rd a h e T Rosamond C erro N Willow Springs Airport oroest e Rd Raceway Barstow Fort Tejon Rosamond Blvd t d S n R i State Historic Park Mil P otrero Hw Rosamond Blvd n Ma Lenwood y Rosamond a S m d i er Frazier e 395 r C R ud a H Fo dy xen Va Park lle w C y F a R razier Mountain P y ny d ark Rd on R 33 d r ve B e Ri a av rs Moj LOS PADRES t ow y NATIONAL FOREST G w R o d d rm s H an R il P a o Lanc E r aster e s Quail Rd T l d t R t al d a S n R n Lake y o yo Avenue D d ti n Avenue D h w n a t C r Na e 0 s 138 l o 138 F s 2 Ali 138 e y Sisquoc 1 H Hungry Valley e 1 l Figueroa Mounta River l in Rd 0 a t State Vehicular General V h 15 d e S William J Fox p 247 VENTURA Recreation Area t y R W e W o l Cuyama t W Airfield all e N2 S V t d Sierra Madre t River n R E h S F t t Mountains ood A Avenue
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ynez Annual Report
    FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 Northern California Southern California Arizona Colorado Oregon FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 CARLSBAD, COVINA, AND SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA CENTENNIAL, COLORADO MEDFORD, OREGON 1126-13 April 24, 2020 San Rafael Board of Directors Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District P.O. Box 719 Santa Ynez, California 93460 Re: Forty-Second Annual Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, 2019-2020 Dear Board Members: Transmitted herewith is our Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District for 2019-2020. This, the Forty-Second Annual Report, presents the required and pertinent information for the Board of Directors to make necessary determinations for levying groundwater charges upon the production of groundwater from water-producing facilities (water wells) within the District. As such, it provides information on the status of the groundwater and surface water supplies, as well as the annual production of groundwater from within the District. Sincerely, Oliver S. Page OSP:rrk Enclosures TABLES OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1. Historical Background 1 1.2. Description of the District 2 1.3. Report Summary 3 1.4. Findings and Determinations 7 1.5. Sources of Information 8 2.0 Groundwater Charges 9 2.1. Revenues 10 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • To Oral History
    100 E. Main St. [email protected] Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 653-0323 x 320 QUARTERLY JOURNAL SUBJECT INDEX About the Index The index to Quarterly subjects represents journals published from 1955 to 2000. Fully capitalized access terms are from Library of Congress Subject Headings. For further information, contact the Librarian. Subject to availability, some back issues of the Quarterly may be ordered by contacting the Museum Store: 805-653-0323 x 316. A AB 218 (Assembly Bill 218), 17/3:1-29, 21 ill.; 30/4:8 AB 442 (Assembly Bill 442), 17/1:2-15 Abadie, (Señor) Domingo, 1/4:3, 8n3; 17/2:ABA Abadie, William, 17/2:ABA Abbott, Perry, 8/2:23 Abella, (Fray) Ramon, 22/2:7 Ablett, Charles E., 10/3:4; 25/1:5 Absco see RAILROADS, Stations Abplanalp, Edward "Ed," 4/2:17; 23/4:49 ill. Abraham, J., 23/4:13 Abu, 10/1:21-23, 24; 26/2:21 Adams, (rented from Juan Camarillo, 1911), 14/1:48 Adams, (Dr.), 4/3:17, 19 Adams, Alpha, 4/1:12, 13 ph. Adams, Asa, 21/3:49; 21/4:2 map Adams, (Mrs.) Asa (Siren), 21/3:49 Adams Canyon, 1/3:16, 5/3:11, 18-20; 17/2:ADA Adams, Eber, 21/3:49 Adams, (Mrs.) Eber (Freelove), 21/3:49 Adams, George F., 9/4:13, 14 Adams, J. H., 4/3:9, 11 Adams, Joachim, 26/1:13 Adams, (Mrs.) Mable Langevin, 14/1:1, 4 ph., 5 Adams, Olen, 29/3:25 Adams, W. G., 22/3:24 Adams, (Mrs.) W.
    [Show full text]
  • Locations Contact Information
    LOCATIONS CONTACT INFORMATION Aerial Services Aeronautic Pictures Craig Schmitman 805-985-2320 http://aeronauticpictures.com/ P.O. Box 1748, Ojai, CA 93024 Film, video and still photography aerial and location services. Stock footage and photos too. We work air-to-anywhere. Demo reel on our website. Aspen Helicopters 805-985-5416 Fax: 805-985-7327 [email protected] http://www.aspenhelo.com/ Crop spraying and aerial tours. Credits: Richmond Prods. FAA Federal Aviation Administration Terri Rector FAA Federal Aviation Administration 10 Burns Place Goleta, CA 93117 805-681-0534, x3102 [email protected] Regional Flight Standards: (Van Nuys) 818-904-6291 Platinum Helicopters, Inc Skybound Charter, LLC Phone: 805-484-6900 Fax: 805-484-6939 Camarillo, Ca. 93010 [email protected] www.platinumhelicopters.com Movie/Television Camera Flight Operations, Aerial Film Productions, Business/VIP Transportation throughout Southern California, Arizona, Nevada. Aerial Photography, Aerial Survey, Private Tours/Sightseeing, Geological Survey. Remote-i Rhandal Sayat - Director of Photography 805-681-7314 [email protected] http://www.remotei.com/ 81 David Love Place, Goleta, CA 93117 Remote Aerial Photography, videography & cinematography services, and camera mount systems. Santa Barbara Biplane Tours Jay Farbman - Marketing Director 805-453-8320 [email protected] http://www.sbbiplane.com/ 406 A Moffett, Santa Barbara, CA 93117 Signature Flight Support Devin Madgett 805-967-5608 Fax: 805-967-5781 515 Marxmiller Rd, Goleta, CA 93117 [email protected] http://www.signatureflight.com/ Helicopter and fixed wing. Hangar storage 6am-10pm. After hours service available. Spitfire Aviation Flight School 805-967-4373 [email protected] 300 Moffett Place, Goleta, CA, 93117 Flights for still photography or filming purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Division by G. A. Miller
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Division RECONNAISSANCE OF THE GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF THE ELLWOOD-GAVIOTA AREA SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By G. A. Miller and J. R. Rapp Prepared in cooperation with the Santa Barbara County Water Agency OPEN-FILE REPORT Menlo Park, California April 10, 1968 CONTENTS Page Purpose and scope of the investigation 3 Location and extent of the area 4 Previous investigations 5 Acknowledgments 5 Location-numbering system- 6 -«»«.«_«._«.«» . _«__ » »__ » »« » » »«_.._,.«.» »_.-«._.^«._«.__ _«__ ._. _.^ ._ ._ . .«.«._*-«-«.«-«-«<- «. -«.«. .--. _ 7i *° ___ ._ _ _____ __ __ ___ - __ __ _ ____»«»»_ _____ « __ » 7i Landforms and drainage 8 |°1\J.L TTTlot-QJ-LllCt UtZ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ _ ___________ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ~" _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ ___ _ _ Q~y Natural vegetation 12 Geology and x^ater-bearing characteristics of the rocks 12 Geologic history- 12 O f-L- -V"L cLo 4"L -Lg-t rr T*JL dJJ!D T"l Vlliy IT _ ___ __ ^ _ _ _ _«__ ___ m » _ _ -v _ ___ _____________ _____ __ _ ________ __«v _ _________ j_jI ^\ Consolidated rocks 15 Unconsolidated deposits 17 Water resources 18 Imported water 21 Ground water 22 Occurrence and movement 22 i\ecnarge~" _______ «. .____«._«._«.«._. _«._«._«.«._«.___«. ._ .«.. ___«._ ^^ iJiscnarge ___ ______ _ _ __- _ ____________________ ^.^ OCf-,-.
    [Show full text]
  • 53048 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 227 1 Wednesday, November 24, 1982 / Proposed Rules
    53048 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 227 1 Wednesday, November 24, 1982 / Proposed Rules prescribed by the Secretary, the terms the Department reviews the executed DATE: Written comments must be and conditions upon which the mortgage loan documents in accordance with the received by January 10, 1983. will be insured. procedure set forth in § 200.163, if the ADDRESS: Send written comments to: (b) Except as set forth in § 200.164(f), documents are acceptable the loan is Chief, Regulations and Procedures commitments are not issued by HUD endorsed. Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco under the single family Program of and Firearms, P.O. Box 385, Washington, PART 237-AMENDED] Direct Endorsement. Under this Program DC 20044-0385, Attention: Notice No. the Department reviews the executed 14. Part 237 is amended by revising 435. loan documents in accordance with the § 237.5 to read as follows: procedure set forth in § 200.163, and if Copies of the petition, the proposed the documents are acceptable the loan is § 237.5 Cross-reference. regulations, the appropriate maps, and written comments will be available for endorsed.. 11. Part To be eligible for insurance under this 203 would be amended by public inspection during normal subpart, a mortgage shall meet all of the business hours at: ATF Reading Room, revising § 203.255 to redd as follows: eligibility requirements for insurance Room 4405, Federal Building, 12th and § 203.255 Insurance of mortgage. under § § 203.1 et seq. (Part 203, Subpart Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, A) of this chapter; § § 220.1 et seq. (Part (a) Upon compliance with a D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • California Assembly District 53 FOUNDATION State Parks Within 60 Minutes Driving Distance from District Office
    CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS California Assembly District 53 FOUNDATION State Parks within 60 minutes driving distance from District Office Ä District Office: 320 West 4th Street, Room 1050, Los Angeles, CA 90013 )" Bolsa Chica SB )" California Citrus SHP )" Castaic Lake SRA )" Chino Hills SP Driving Distance: 33.0 miles Driving Distance: 56.5 miles Driving Distance: 43.1 miles Driving Distance: 37.5 miles Driving Time: 37 minutes Driving Time: 53 minutes Driving Time: 41 minutes Driving Time: 36 minutes Transit Time: 3 hours, 23 minutes Transit Time: 3 hours, 10 minutes Transit Time: not available Transit Time: 2 hours, 58 minutes )" Corona del Mar SB )" Crystal Cove SP )" Dockweiler SB )" Huntington SB Driving Distance: 46.1 miles Driving Distance: 48.9 miles Driving Distance: 18.9 miles Driving Distance: 38.9 miles Driving Time: 47 minutes Driving Time: 49 minutes Driving Time: 20 minutes Driving Time: 42 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 58 minutes Transit Time: 2 hours, 1 minutes Transit Time: 2 hours, 46 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 40 minutes )" Kenneth Hahn SRA )" Leo Carrillo SP )" Los Angeles SHP )" Los Encinos SHP Driving Distance: 9.5 miles Driving Distance: 42.5 miles Driving Distance: 2.0 miles Driving Distance: 19.2 miles Driving Time: 15 minutes Driving Time: 50 minutes Driving Time: 5 minutes Driving Time: 21 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 1 minutes Transit Time: 2 Hours, 27 minutes Transit Time: 20 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 25 minutes )" Malibu Creek SP )" Placerita Canyon SP )" Point Dume SB )" Pío Pico SHP Driving Distance: 34.5 miles Driving Distance: 31.6 miles Driving Distance: 35.4 miles Driving Distance: 18.5 miles Driving Time: 34 minutes Driving Time: 31 minutes Driving Time: 45 minutes Driving Time: 19 minutes Transit Time: 2 hour, 18 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 34 minutes Transit Time: 2 hours, 39 minutes Transit Time: 1 hour, 51 minutes )" Rio de Los Angeles State Park SRA )" Robert H.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Collections
    A. andersonii A. Gray SANTA CRUZ MANZANITA San Mateo Along Skyline Blvd. between Gulch Road and la Honda Rd. (A. regismontana?) Santa Cruz Along Empire Grade, about 2 miles north of its intersection with Alba Grade. Lat. N. 37° 07', Long. 122° 10' W. Altitude about 2550 feet. Santa Cruz Aong grade (summit) 0.8 mi nw Alba Road junction (2600 ft elev. above and nw of Ben Lomond (town)) - Empire Grade Santa Cruz Near Summit of Opal Creek Rd., Big Basin Redwood State Park. Santa Cruz Near intersection of Empire Grade and Alba Grade. ben Lomond Mountain. Santa Cruz Along China Grade, 0.2 miles NW of its intersection with the Big Basin-Saratoga Summit Rd. Santa Cruz Nisene Marks State Park, Aptos Creek watershed; under PG&E high-voltage transmission line on eastern rim of the creek canyon Santa Cruz Along Redwood Drive 1.5 miles up (north of) from Monte Toyon Santa Cruz Miller's Ranch, summit between Gilroy and Watsonville. Santa Cruz At junction of Alba Road and Empire Road Ben Lomond Ridge summit Santa Cruz Sandy ridges near Bonny Doon - Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz 3 miles NW of Santa Cruz, on upper UC Santa Cruz campus, Marshall Fields Santa Cruz Mt. Madonna Road along summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Between Lands End and Manzanitas School. Lat. N. 37° 02', Long. 121° 45' W; elev. 2000 feet Monterey Moro Road, Prunedale (A. pajaroensis?) A. auriculata Eastw. MT. DIABLO MANZANITA Contra Costa Between two major cuts of Cowell Cement Company (w face of ridge) - Mount Diablo, Lime Ridge Contra Costa Immediately south of Nortonville; 37°57'N, 121°53'W Contra Costa Top Pine Canyon Ridge (s-facing slope between the two forks) - Mount Diablo, Emmons Canyon (off Stone Valley) Contra Costa Near fire trail which runs s from large spur (on meridian) heading into Sycamore Canyon - Mount Diablo, Inner Black Hills Contra Costa Off Summit Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • SELECTING NATIVES for YOUR WILDLIFE GARDEN by Alan Pollack
    Published by the San Fernando Valley Audubon Society A Chapter of the National Audubon Society August/September 2008 Volume 59 No. 7 AUDUBON AT HOME SELECTING NATIVES FOR YOUR WILDLIFE GARDEN by Alan Pollack A good way to start the selection process is to not like much water, so one wouldn’t put thirsty shrubs or know what plant community you reside in and obtain a list perennials under an oak. Then, there are some trees, like of plants that make up that community. (You can do that by the walnut, that are allelopathic: the roots secrete a sub- going to laspilitas.com, search for plant communities by zip stance that inhibits the growth of many plants in the root code, entering your zip code, and click on plant list.) One zone, while some other plants are able to survive. needn’t restrict one’s choices to just that one community, Help is available. Native plant nurseries have Web- as some plants from other communities might also do well. sites: (I’ve already mentioned) laspilitas.com; matilijanurs- For example, though most of Los Angeles is Coastal Sage ery.com; Theodorepayne.org… to name a few. Lacnps.org Scrub, plants from Chaparral, Oak Woodland, and Desert is the Los Angeles California Native Plant Society’s Website. habitats can do well here. There are many books on the subject, but make sure the Know what kind of soil is in your garden. Much of the focus is on Southern California, and not New England or San Fernando Valley has clay soil, but there may be pockets the Pacific Northwest.
    [Show full text]