Yavapai and Apache

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yavapai and Apache 120 Vanishing River Landscapes and Lives of the Lower Verde Valley THE LOWER VERDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT Overview, Synthesis, and Conclusions edited by Stephanie M. Whittlesey, Richard Ciolek-Torrello, and jeffrey H. Altschul 'Water Rights Adjudica!lon feai,, Civil Division Mumoy Generars Oliica: SRl Press + Tucson, Arizona + 1997 CHAPTER 8 Euroamerican History, 1540 to the Present Stephanie M. Whittlesey, Teresita Majewski, John R Welch, Matthew C. Bischoff, and Richard Ciolek-Torrello 1is chapter discusses processes and events that have the temporary camps that supported dam construction- shaped the history and use of central Arizona since A.D. 1540, 700 people at Bartlett Dam alone-than during any other the year in which Coronado's expedition brought southwest­ time in history. ern prehistory to a close. We take a chronological and the­ The lower Verde region was often peripheral to the major matic approach, in which specific dates and incidents are economic, social, and political developments that charac­ considered as milestones of broader, regional-scale processes. terized Arizona history, and affected more by events unfolding The focus is on land-use patterns and what these patterns can in the administrative centers of Mexico, Washington, D.C., tell us about environmental and social variability: trends in and Phoenix than any local policies and processes. Yet, the economic activities and the political, cultural, and environ­ lower Verde region was not completely isolated, but was mental factors that appear to have stimulated or discouraged linked by various economic and political ties to the major certain uses of the land. Because Chapters 5, 6, and 7 focus centers of the state. The history of the lower Verde region, on Yavapai and Apache culture histories and adaptations of even more so than its prehistory, must be understood in the indigenous populations to central Arizona, this chapter pri­ context of larger, regional processes. We view the specific marily concerns Euroamerican history. Because the interac­ events and processes of lower Verde history as examples of tion of Euroamericans with Native Americans is an important more encompassing trends. part of Arizona history, the chapter includes profiles of Yava­ pai and Apache reservations by Teresita Majewski, along with discussions of patterns in Euroamerican and Native American relationships and their impacts. The seventeenth-century expansion of New Spain's Periods and Themes northwestern frontier had minimal impact on central Arizona north of the Gila River. As a result, there are few documen­ in Lower Verde tary references dating before about 1860, a period repre­ Regional History senting virtually the entire span of Spanish and Mexican possession of the area. For compelling reasons that will emerge in this chapter, Euroamerican settlement of cen­ This review is structured by temporal periods and historical tral Arizona was sparse, and was particularly so in the lower themes. We recognize four broad periods defined by shifts in Verde valley. Stone and Ayres (1984:36) observe that "the political and administrative control (Table 8.1). Eight gen­ area was essentially devoid of significant non-Indian cultural eral land-use themes further subdivide each period (see Ta­ activity before 1900," a statement echoed by Douglas et al. ble 8.1). By comparison, Macnider and Effiand (1989:10-15) ( 1994: 181) who write, "The Verde Valley in the vicinity divide history into four periods: ( 1) proto historic ( 1400- of Horseshoe Dam can be described as an area of mar­ 1800), (2) early historical (1700-1860), (3) late historical ginal historical development.'' Perhaps its most populous pe­ (1860-1940), and (4) recent (after 1940). They also develop riod was during the construction of Horseshoe and Bartlett a number of thematic categories for Tonto National Forest as Dams. More people, Indian and non-Indian alike, lived in a whole. Because this review is temporal and thematic, we 281 282 Vanishing River: landscapes and lives of the lower Verde Valley Whittlesey, Majewski, Welch, Bischoff, & Ciolek~Torrello • Euroamerican History, 1540 to the Present 283 Table 8.1. Periods in the Euroamerican History of the concerns the efforts by land developers, agricultural inter­ (1947), Wood (1989:24) also maintains that the most prob­ "peaceful rustic people." The Indians were working mines Lower Verde Region ests, and government agencies to augment and safeguard the able location of Chichilticale is in Tonto Basin. He identifies near present-day Jerome. Schroeder (1959:51) vvrites, domestic and agricultural water supply for the ever-thirsty the people encountered by the Spanish as Sobaipuri, not Approximate Dominant Prevailing Yavapai. Wood suggests that many Classic period sites may Obregon called these people Querechos .... He stated Dates (A.D.) Administration land-Use Themes Phoenix Basin. The recent history of central Arizona in general, and the eventually prove to date to the protohistoric or early histori­ they wore crosses .... They went about naked and used 1540-1848 Spanish, Mexican exploration lower Verde region in particular, differs fundamentally from cal period. Other reconstructions of the Coronado route copper and blue stones from the mines to paint blankets, place Chichilticale much farther south. in Eagle Pass be­ houses, pottery and themselves. 1849-1874 federal (U.S) exploration the previous periods. Concern has shifted from its environ­ territorial (Arizona) native subjugation mental potential to management of what has become pre­ tween the Piiialeno and Santa Teresa Mountains (e.g., Bolton Luxan, who accompanied Espejo, said these people mining dominantly a recreation area and primarily a land under 1949:105-106). lfthe Bolton route to Cfbola is followed, lived in houses of Branches, that they wore crovvns of government National Forest management. The two themes dominating the Coronado expedition traveled across the present-day Fort painted sticks on their head and had baskets of mescal and the final period reveal the use of the region as Apache Indian Reservation. The Spanish chronicles referred pinyon nuts as well as a bread made from them. They also 1875-1945 federal homesteading contempor~ry to the region north of Chichilticale as tierra despoblada, an planted maize. Espejo referred to these people as agriculture a recreation area for city dwellers, while underscoring the hydraulic engineering constraints on small-scale farming and ranching efforts. unpopulated land, and no indigenous populations were en­ Tiburans or Seranos. government countered. This certainly accords with archaeological evi­ dence for abandonment of the central mountains in the late In 1598, Marcos Farfan de los Gados apparently followed 1946-present federal recreation A.D. 1300s (Reid 1989). Whittlesey and Reid (1989) review Espejo's route to Jerome (Byrkit 1988:13; see Figure 8.1) government the Coronado expedition route; they find little supporting and encountered similar native populations. According to The Period of Exploration, evidence for the Bolton route, although it has generally been Schroeder ( 19 59:5 2-5 3), near the headwaters of Dry Beaver 1540-1848 the accepted alternative (see Di Peso 1974; U.S. Department Creek, have chosen to review central Arizona north of the Phoenix of the Interior 1991). Basin as a single entity, although Chapter 4 treats its history The route taken by Antonio de Espejo in his search fOr Farfan reached another group of Indians and he referred of research and archaeology by geographical area. The earliest documentary records pertaining to central Ari­ mineral prospects south and west of the Hopi country has to the place as Rancherfa de los Cruzados .... From here The exploration theme characterizes the initial three cen­ zona were produced by Spanish expeditions. In a series of prompted less controversy. In May 1583, after descending their chief led them ... [to] another rancheda where the turies of non-Indian use of the region north of the Gila adventures that can be characterized as quests fOr glory; Beaver Creek from the east, the Espejo expedition probably Indians had ore, mescal and venison. On November 24, River as well as the first period. That this theme dominated gold, and God, parties led by Coronadol Espejo, Farfan, and was the first party of non-Indians to ascend the Verde River. seven leagues (league = 2.65 miles) further, they reached the documentary record so long reflects the tenuousness of Oiiate traversed areas north of the Gila River. In general, Colton (1939b) much later borrowed the Spanish name for the mine in which vicinity there were Indians from several Spanish, Mexican, and early American control over the study these explorations left little trace on either the central Ari­ the river, El Rio de los Reyes (River of the Kings), to label the rancherfas. Farfan stated these people, who wore area, as well as the marginal nature of the region with regard zona landscape or its people. The expeditions reconnoitered Sinagua culture of the Verde valley. In her discussion of the crosses, extracted ores from the mine and used them fOr to most of the primary forces driving frontier history. northern Arizona fOr the most part, and although Coronado route taken by Espejo, Bartlett (1942) suggests that the party personal adornment and fOr coloring their blankets . The initial non-Indian use and settlement of central Ari­ crossed central Arizona en route to Cibola, his trail remains followed a route from the Hopi villages through Winslow brown, black, blue and green. [S]ome wore shells, zona during the second period was constrained significantly obscure. The region was largely a passage to elsewhere, and if to Jerome (Figure 8.1). Byrkit (1988) labels this route the obtained from the sea thirty days travel away. by resistance from indigenous populations. The clash be­ any of these expeditions traveled through the lower Verde Palatkwapi trail, after the Hopi clan migration story (Cour­ tween Euroamerican and Native American cultures was inevi­ area,· it was not reported. No unambiguous documentary lander 1971; Waters 1963).
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Perspectives on the Hohokam
    Bulletin of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Tucson, Arizona December 2009 Number 60 Michael Hampshire’s artist rendition of Pueblo Grande platform mound (right); post-excavation view of compound area northwest of Pueblo Grande platform mound (above) TRIBAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE HOHOKAM Donald Bahr, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Arizona State University The archaeologists’ name for the principal pre-European culture of southern Arizona is Hohokam, a word they adopted from the O’odham (formerly Pima-Papago). I am not sure which archaeologist first used that word. It seems that the first documented but unpublished use is from 1874 or 1875 (Haury 1976:5). In any case, since around then archaeologists have used their methods to define and explain the origin, development, geographic extent, and end of the Hohokam culture. This article is not about the archaeologists’ Hohokam, but about the stories and explanations of past peoples as told by the three Native American tribes who either grew from or replaced the archaeologists’ Hohokam on former Hohokam land. These are the O’odham, of course, but also the Maricopa and Yavapai. The Maricopa during European times (since about 1550) lived on lands previously occupied by the Hohokam and Patayan archaeological cultures, and the Yavapai lived on lands of the older Hohokam, Patayan, Hakataya, Salado, and Western Anasazi cultures – to use all of the names that have been used, sometimes overlappingly, for previous cultures of the region. The Stories The O’odham word huhugkam means “something that is used up or finished.” The word consists of the verb huhug, which means “to be used up or finished,” and the suffix “-kam,” which means “something that is this way.” Huhug is generally, and perhaps only, used as an intransitive, not a transitive, verb.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey
    THEODORE ROOSEVELT RESERVOIR 1995 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY 1.FOkTF1Ep02. RESOiJ U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation ERRATA Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey Page 10, Table 1, item 9: This should read 2,100 feet rather than 2214. Page 12, Table 1, item 47,footnote 1: Modifications to Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised the dam elevation and lowered the spillway sill elevation. The original dam elevation was 2142 and the spiliway elevation (top of radial gates) was 2136. Page 13. Table 2, ,foolnole 7: Computed sediment expressed as a percentage of total computed sediment (182,185 acre-feet). REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE FormApproved J 0MB No. 0704-0188 Pubhc reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the cotlection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suit 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paper-work Reduction Report (0704-0188), Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 1996 Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTiTLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey PR 6. AUTHOR(S) Joe Lyons and Lori Lest 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bureau of Reclamation REPORT NUMBER Technical Service Center Denver CO 80225 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Arizona Project
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short 1982 Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10) 6-9-1982 The Central Arizona Project Jon Kyl Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy- development-and-growth-interbasin-transfers Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Animal Law Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Contracts Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Hydrology Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Kyl, Jon, "The Central Arizona Project" (1982). New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy-development-and-growth-interbasin- transfers/21 Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. Jon Kyl, The Central Arizona Project, in NEW SOURCES OF WATER FOR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH: INTERBASIN TRANSFERS (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 1982). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Lands
    ArizonA indiAn GAminG AssociAtion • AnnuAl report FY 2008 TRIBAL LANDS PAGE San Juan Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Southern Paiute Tribe Navajo Nation Havasupai Hopi Tribe Tribe Hualapai Tribe KINGMAN FLAGSTAFF Fort Mojave Tribe CAMP VERDE Yavapai-Apache Nation Zuni Tribe PRESCOTT Yavapai Prescott Tribe PAYSON Tonto Apache Colorado River Tribe Indian Tribes White Mountain Fort McDowell Apache Tribe Yavapai Nation PHOENIX San Carlos Salt River Apache Tribe Pima-Maricopa Gila River Indian Community Fort Yuma- Indian Quechan Tribe Community Ak-Chin Indian Community YUMA Cocopah Tribe Tohono TUCSON O’odham Pascua Yaqui Tribe Nation Ak-Chin Indian Community Havasupai Tribe San Juan Southern Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino Paiute Tribe Hualapai Tribe Cocopah Tribe Tohono O’odham Nation Cocopah Casino Hopi Tribe* Desert Diamond Casino I & II and Golden Ha’San Casino Colorado River Indian Tribes* Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Blue Water Casino Tonto Apache Tribe Mazatzal Casino Fort McDowell Navajo Nation Yavapai Nation White Mountain Apache Tribe Fort McDowell Casino Pascua Yaqui Tribe Hon Dah Casino Casino of the Sun Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Casino Del Sol Yavapai-Apache Nation Spirit Mountain Casino Cliff Castle Casino Valley, Avi Resort Casino Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Yavapai Prescott Tribe* Casino Arizona at Salt River Fort Yuma-Quechan Tribe Yavapai Gaming Center Casino Arizona at Talking Stick Paradise Casino & Bucky’s Casino San Carlos Apache Tribe Gila River Indian Community Apache Gold Casino Zuni Tribe Gila River Casinos at Wild Horse Pass, Lone Butte and Vee Quiva *Not a member of AIGA Letter From The Chairwoman It is with pleasure that we present our fifth Annual Report for the Arizona Indian Gaming Association (AIGA).
    [Show full text]
  • Positively Apache Junction
    POSITIVELY APACHE JUNCTION A COLLABORATIVE REPORT OF ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY’S PROJECT CITIES & THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION This report represents original work prepared for the City of Apache Junction by students participating in courses aligned with Arizona State University’s Project Cities program. Findings, information, and recommendations are those of students and are not necessarily of Arizona State University. Student reports are not peer reviewed for statistical or computational accuracy, or comprehensively fact-checked, in the same fashion as academic journal articles. Project partners should use care when using student reports as justification for future actions. Text and images contained in this report may not be used without permission from Project Cities. TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Acknowledgments PART 1 5 Foreword from Apache Junction’s Mayor GET ACQUAINTED 6 About Project Cities WITH THE PROJECT 7 About Apache Junction 8 Map of Apache Junction and Greater Phoenix 9 Executive Summary 11 Course Goals and Recommendations 11 TDM 372 Tourism Planning: Planning Tourism’s Future in Apache Junction: Adventure Awaits 15 TWC 544 User Experience: Creating a Rewarding Website Experience for Potential Visitors 17 Planning Tourism’s Future in Apache Junction: PART 2 Adventure Awaits GO IN-DEPTH: 18 Acknowledgments TOURISM PLANNING 19 Introduction 20 Problem 20 Methods 24 Findings 27 Recommendations 31 Areas for Further Exploration 32 Conclusion 33 Creating a Rewarding Website Experience PART 3 for Potential Visitors GO IN-DEPTH: 34 Acknowledgments
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role
    Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role Updated March 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45546 SUMMARY R45546 Management of the Colorado River: Water March 21, 2019 Allocation, Drought, and the Federal Role Charles V. Stern The Colorado River Basin covers more than 246,000 square miles in seven U.S. states Specialist in Natural (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California) and Resources Policy Mexico. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Reclamation (part of the Department of the Interior) manages much of the basin’s water supplies. Colorado River water is used Pervaze A. Sheikh primarily for agricultural irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, but it also Specialist in Natural is important for power production, fish and wildlife, and recreational uses. Resources Policy In recent years, consumptive uses of Colorado River water have exceeded natural flows. This causes an imbalance in the basin’s available supplies and competing demands. A drought in the basin dating to 2000 has raised the prospect of water delivery curtailments and decreased hydropower production, among other things. In the future, observers expect that increasing demand for supplies, coupled with the effects of climate change, will further increase the strain on the basin’s limited water supplies. River Management The Law of the River is the commonly used shorthand for the multiple laws, court decisions, and other documents governing Colorado River operations. The foundational document of the Law of the River is the Colorado River Compact of 1922. Pursuant to the compact, the basin states established a framework to apportion the water supplies between the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, with the dividing line between the two basins at Lee Ferry, AZ (near the Utah border).
    [Show full text]
  • Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott
    County Profile for Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott Yavapai County, one of the state’s oldest counties, was among the original four created when Arizona was still a territory. Although Yavapai County originally encompassed more than 65,000 square miles, it now covers only 8,125 square miles, but is still as large as the state of New Jersey. It was called the "Mother of Counties," from which Apache, Coconino, Gila, Maricopa and Navajo counties were all formed. The provisional seat of the territorial government was established at Fort Whipple in Chino Valley on Jan. 22, 1864. Nine months later it was moved 20 miles away to the little mining community of Prescott. In 1867, the capital was moved to Tucson where it remained for 10 years. Then the capital was shifted back to Prescott, where it remained until 1889, when it was permanently relocated to Phoenix. Prescott is now the county seat of Yavapai County. Yavapai County offers many local attractions ranging from natural to cultural to educational. Scenic pine forests provide yeare-round recreational opportunities, and museums, monuments and rodeos reflect Arizona’s tribal and territorial past. Institutions of higher learning include two colleges and an aeronautical university. The county has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, with the population up by more than 30 percent since 1990. The U.S. Forest Service owns 38 percent of the land in Yavapai County, including portions of Prescott, Tonto and Coconino national forests, while the state of Arizona owns an additional 25 percent. Twenty-five percent of land in the county is owned by individuals or corporations, and 12 percent is the property of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
    [Show full text]
  • General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona
    General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Prepared for City of Phoenix City Archaeology Office Parks and Recreation Department Pueblo Grande Museum 4619 E. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Pueblo Grande Museum Project No. 2017-009 Project Report No. 19-120 Desert Archaeology, Inc. Prepared by: T. Kathleen Henderson Submitted by: Patricia Castalia Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 N. Tucson Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85716 July 31, 2020 ABSTRACT Report Title: General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Project Name: General Monitoring and Discovery Plan Update Project Location: Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Project Sponsor: City of Phoenix Sponsor Project Number(s): None (Pueblo Grande Museum No. 2017-009) Lead Agency: City of Phoenix Other Involved Agencies: Arizona State Historic Preservation Office; Arizona State Museum Applicable Regulations: City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8); Arizona Antiquities Act (ARS §41-841 et seq.); Arizona state burial laws (ARS §41-844 and ARS §41-865) Funding Source: City Description of the Project/Undertaking: Provide an updated general monitoring and discovery plan for the city of Phoenix Project Area/Area of Potential Effects (APE): Lands inside the boundary of the city of Phoenix and city-owned facilities that lie outside this boundary; acreage to be established by individual projects conducted under this updated plan Legal Description: To be established by individual
    [Show full text]
  • The Superstition Mountains: What Future Use Will Best Serve Arizona?
    [c. 1962] THE SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS What Future Use Will Best Serve Arizona? A Special Report By Rep. Morris K. Udall The population of Arizona is increasing by some 60,000 people every year -- equivalent to the 1960 populations of Flagstaff, Prescott, Yuma and Safford combined. By 1970 our population will move well beyond 2,000,000. Additional land for commercial and residential purposes will be required. Existing facilities for every public need, including recreation and parks, will feel increasing pressures. Those of us entrusted with present day leadership in Arizona affairs ought to peer ahead now and then, as best we can, and take a long-range view. This report is an attempt to fulfill part of that responsibility. The press of population and our nation's diminishing recreational resources throughout the country have made Congress and the President anxious to undertake a long-range program of resource planning. If Arizona has any aspirations and needs in this field, the next few years will be the time to act. I expect that more new national parks, monuments and recreation areas will be created in the next 5 years than in the last 30. By 1964 a new National Recreation Area will come into being around Powell Lake behind Glen Canyon Dam. The 87th Congress has established Cape Cod National Seashore; it is considering and will probably establish new national parks at Point Reyes, California, Padre Island, Texas, and the Utah Canyonlands within the near future. The Wilderness Bill, a central part of this bi-partisan effort, has already passed the Senate and should pass the House before adjournment.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowbird Rally Trip to Tortilla Flats and Canyon Lake, Arizona April 7
    Snowbird Rally trip to Tortilla Flats and Canyon Lake, Arizona April 7, 2016 This report describes a day trip on April 7th, 2016. It was an event led and arranged by Marlene and Chris Carty, hosts of the spring Snowbird Trailer rally. The Snowbird International Travel Club has been around since about 1992. They gather twice a year, spring and fall. They have met in places as far afield as Gettysburg, PA, Calgary, Dollyland, Anacortes, Washington state, Santa Fe, NM, Toronto, San Diego, Galveston, Oklahoma City, now the Phoenix area and many other places. They have had as many as 105 rigs but are now down to 17 plus a few older "lifetime" members. They are a group of close, longtime friends who enjoy getting together and having a good time. The group departed the Canyon Vista RV Park in Gold Canyon, Arizona with the destinations of Tortilla Flats for lunch and a boat ride on the Dolly on Canyon Lake. After departing the RV Park we accessed Rt. 60 and then turned onto Rt. 88, also known as the Apache Trail. It was originally known as the Yavapai Trail. The Apache Trail in Arizona was a stagecoach trail that ran through the Superstition Mountains. It was named the Apache Trail after the Apache Indians who originally used this trail to move through the Superstition Mountains. Today, much of the Apache Trail is paved, and the section east of Apache Junction is known officially as State Route 88. Prior to the completion of the Superstition Freeway in 1992, the Apache Junction portion of the Apache Trail was part of US Highway 60, which was rerouted to the Superstition Freeway once it was completed.
    [Show full text]