DOCSLIB.ORG

Laboratoire Domaines Océaniques UMR6538 Dossier Quadriennal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Laboratoire Domaines Océaniques UMR6538 Dossier Quadriennal Laboratoire Domaines Océaniques UMR6538 Université de Bretagne Occidentale & CNRS/INSU Dossier quadriennal 2012-2015 1ère partie : Bilan 2006-2010 Laboratoire Domaines Océaniques, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer Place Copernic, 29180 Plouzané http://www-sdt.univ-brest.fr Sommaire Bilan général de l’unité 2006-2010 ................................................................................................ 3 Présentation générale ...............................................................................................................3 Environnement du laboratoire ..................................................................................................3 Forces et faiblesses...............................................................................................................3 Points forts du bilan .................................................................................................................4 Production scientifique ..........................................................................................................4 Valorisation ........................................................................................................................4 Thématiques transverses dans l’Institut .......................................................................................5 Vie du laboratoire ....................................................................................................................5 Organisation, animation scientifique & fonctionnement....................................................................5 Organigramme du laboratoire...................................................................................................6 Financements......................................................................................................................7 Ressources humaines .............................................................................................................8 Hygiène et sécurité............................................................................................................. 10 Enseignement et formation par la recherche .................................................................................. 10 Licence ........................................................................................................................... 10 Master ............................................................................................................................ 10 Doctorat.......................................................................................................................... 11 Plateformes techniques et analytiques.......................................................................................... 12 Pôle analytique ................................................................................................................. 12 Pôle technique .................................................................................................................. 13 Pôle image ....................................................................................................................... 13 Participation à l’observatoire OSU-IUEM ........................................................................................ 14 Observatoire hauturier......................................................................................................... 14 Observatoire côtier............................................................................................................. 14 Equipe « Géo-aléas » ................................................................................................................. 15 Composition de l’équipe .......................................................................................................... 15 Bilan scientifique................................................................................................................... 16 Thème 1 : Sismicité, déformation et risques naturels sous-marins ...................................................... 16 Thème 2 : Volcanisme et tectonique active des dorsales ................................................................. 18 Thème 3 : Mouvements sédimentaires en domaine littoral............................................................... 19 Equipe « Processus Sédimentaires & Biodiversité » ............................................................................ 21 Composition de l’équipe .......................................................................................................... 21 Bilan scientifique................................................................................................................... 23 Thème 1 « Processus et enregistrements sédimentaires »................................................................ 23 Thème 2 « Biodiversité, biogéographie et environnements » ............................................................ 25 Equipe « Dynamique de la lithosphère & Hétérogénéités du manteau » .................................................. 27 Composition de l’équipe .......................................................................................................... 27 Bilan scientifique................................................................................................................... 28 Thème 1 : Accrétion océanique............................................................................................... 28 Thème 2 : Rifts continentaux ................................................................................................. 29 Thème 3 : Cyclicité magmatique et hétérogénéités du manteau........................................................ 31 Equipe « Méthodologie & Instrumentation »..................................................................................... 33 Composition de l’équipe .......................................................................................................... 33 Bilan scientifique................................................................................................................... 34 Thème 1 : Imagerie de surface ............................................................................................... 34 Thème 2 : Hydroacoustique ................................................................................................... 35 Thème 3 : Electromagnétisme ................................................................................................ 37 Annexe 1 : Publications 1/1/2006-30/6/2010 ................................................................................... 39 Annexe 2 : Responsabilités nationales et internationales..................................................................... 60 Annexe 3 : Campagnes à la Mer et Missions de Terrain 2006-2010......................................................... 62 Annexe 4 : Séminaires du laboratoire............................................................................................. 66 Annexe 5 : Bilan financier - 2006-2009 .......................................................................................... 69 Annexe 6 : Visiteurs du laboratoire ............................................................................................... 70 Annexe 7 : Bilan Communication – 2006-2010 .................................................................................. 72 Annexe 8 : Bilan Ressources humaines – 2006-2010 ........................................................................... 77 Annexe 9 : Bilan Formation permanente - 2006-2010......................................................................... 80 Annexe 10 : Bilan Hygiène et sécurité - 2006-2010............................................................................ 82 Annexe 11 : Plateforme Analytique en Pétrologie et Géochimie ............................................................ 84 Tableaux & Fiches AERES............................................................................................................ 87 Bilan général de l’unité 2006-2010 Présentation générale « Domaines Océaniques » est un laboratoire pluridisciplinaire en sciences de la Terre dont l’activité de recherche est focalisée sur la genèse et l’évolution des domaines océaniques. L’expertise du laboratoire reste sur les domaines océaniques profonds, de la marge aux dorsales, et sur le rift, zone de déchirure continentale. Notre « transgression » vers le domaine littoral et l’espace terrestre est un élargissement important de notre champ d’investigation. Cette évolution répond en partie à la nécessité de considérer la transition Terre/Mer des structures ou les transferts de matière Terre/Mer, et en partie à l’accroissement de la demande sociétale (et des programmes incitatifs associés) sur l’espace littoral. Cette évolution ouvre aussi un champ d’interactions plus fortes avec les laboratoires de l’Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, dont c’est l’objet d’étude majeur. Le laboratoire est structuré en 3 équipes thématiques « géo-aléas », « processus sédimentaires et biodiversité », « dynamique de la lithosphère et hétérogénéités du manteau », qui abordent les processus géodynamiques à des échelles de temps et d’espace progressivement croissantes, et une équipe « méthodologie et instrumentation » marine, qui développe des méthodes et des outils originaux d’investigation des domaines hauturiers et littoraux. Deux pôles analytique et technique viennent en soutien et participent à l’activité
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coevolution of Global Brachiopod Palaeobiogeography and Tectonopalaeogeography During the Carboniferous Ning Li1,2*, Cheng-Wen Wang1, Pu Zong3 and Yong-Qin Mao4
    Li et al. Journal of Palaeogeography (2021) 10:18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00095-z Journal of Palaeogeography ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Coevolution of global brachiopod palaeobiogeography and tectonopalaeogeography during the Carboniferous Ning Li1,2*, Cheng-Wen Wang1, Pu Zong3 and Yong-Qin Mao4 Abstract The global brachiopod palaeobiogeography of the Mississippian is divided into three realms, six regions, and eight provinces, while that of the Pennsylvanian is divided into three realms, six regions, and nine provinces. On this basis, we examined coevolutionary relationships between brachiopod palaeobiogeography and tectonopalaeogeography using a comparative approach spanning the Carboniferous. The appearance of the Boreal Realm in the Mississippian was closely related to movements of the northern plates into middle–high latitudes. From the Mississippian to the Pennsylvanian, the palaeobiogeography of Australia transitioned from the Tethys Realm to the Gondwana Realm, which is related to the southward movement of eastern Gondwana from middle to high southern latitudes. The transition of the Yukon–Pechora area from the Tethys Realm to the Boreal Realm was associated with the northward movement of Laurussia, whose northern margin entered middle–high northern latitudes then. The formation of the six palaeobiogeographic regions of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian brachiopods was directly related to “continental barriers”, which resulted in the geographical isolation of each region. The barriers resulted from the configurations of Siberia, Gondwana, and Laurussia, which supported the Boreal, Tethys, and Gondwana realms, respectively. During the late Late Devonian–Early Mississippian, the Rheic seaway closed and North America (from Laurussia) joined with South America and Africa (from Gondwana), such that the function of “continental barriers” was strengthened and the differentiation of eastern and western regions of the Tethys Realm became more distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeobiogeography of the Late Carboniferous Brachiopoda from Velebit Mt
    2016 | 69/2 | 177–185 | 10 Figs. | 2 Tabs. | www.geologia-croatica Journal of the Croatian Geological Survey and the Croatian Geological Society Palaeobiogeography of the Late Carboniferous brachiopoda from Velebit Mt. (Croatia) Mirko Japundžić1 and Jasenka Sremac2 1 Gruška 16, 10 000 Zagreb, Hrvatska; ([email protected]) 2 University of Zagreb, Department of Geology, Division of Geology and Paleontology, Horvatovac 102a, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (corresponding author: [email protected]) doi: 10.4154/gc.2016.23 Abstract Article history: An abundant and diverse Late Carboniferous brachiopod fauna from Velebit Mt. (Croatia) com- Manuscript received September 30, 2015 prises 63 brachiopod taxa dominated by Productida and Spiriferida. The Spiriferinida, Athyridida, Revised manuscript accepted June 21, 2016 Orthotethida and Rhynchonellata are less common, while the Orthida, Dictyonellida and Tere- Available online June 29, 2016 bratulida occur in very small numbers. Brachiopods are mostly preserved as casts and moulds in shales, limestones and sandstones. Associated fusulinid foraminifera and calcareous algae Keywords: Brachiopoda, palaeobiogeography, indicate a Kasimovian to Gzhelian age for the brachiopod–bearing deposits. The global biogeo- palaeoecology, Late Carboniferous, Velebit Mt., graphic distribution of brachiopod taxa indicates the probable seaways and brachiopod migra- Croatia. tion routes, along the Euramerican shelves. 1. INTRODUCTION Brachiopods are common marine macrofossils in the Late Car- to 6 km wide, representing the core of an anticline, with a NW– boniferous sedimentary rocks of Velebit Mt. They have been col- SE strike (Fig. 1). They exhibit a variety of ancient environments lected since the beginning of the 19th century and stored in the varying from shoreline forests and swamps, through coastal and Croatian Natural History Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Permophiles International Commission on Stratigraphy
    Permophiles International Commission on Stratigraphy Newsletter of the Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy Number 66 Supplement 1 ISSN 1684 – 5927 August 2018 Permophiles Issue #66 Supplement 1 8th INTERNATIONAL BRACHIOPOD CONGRESS Brachiopods in a changing planet: from the past to the future Milano 11-14 September 2018 GENERAL CHAIRS Lucia Angiolini, Università di Milano, Italy Renato Posenato, Università di Ferrara, Italy ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Chair: Gaia Crippa, Università di Milano, Italy Valentina Brandolese, Università di Ferrara, Italy Claudio Garbelli, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, China Daniela Henkel, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany Marco Romanin, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland Facheng Ye, Università di Milano, Italy SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Fernando Álvarez Martínez, Universidad de Oviedo, Spain Lucia Angiolini, Università di Milano, Italy Uwe Brand, Brock University, Canada Sandra J. Carlson, University of California, Davis, United States Maggie Cusack, University of Stirling, United Kingdom Anton Eisenhauer, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany David A.T. Harper, Durham University, United Kingdom Lars Holmer, Uppsala University, Sweden Fernando Garcia Joral, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain Carsten Lüter, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany Alberto Pérez-Huerta, University of Alabama, United States Renato Posenato, Università di Ferrara, Italy Shuzhong Shen, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, China 1 Permophiles Issue #66 Supplement
    [Show full text]
  • (Spiriferida) 49, Aflevering 2, Pp. 277-283, 1-9-1973 Probably Three
    LEIDSE GEOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN, Deel 49, Aflevering 2, pp. 277-283, 1-9-1973 On the phylogenetic position of the genus Boucotinskia Brunton and Cocks, 1967 (Spiriferida) BY Th.F. Krans Abstract of Boucotinskia A morphological comparison Brunton & Cocks, 1967 and Kozlowskiellina Boucot, 1957 makes a phylogenctic relation- ship between the two genera obvious. Boucotinskia is placed in the subfamily Cyrtinopsidinae. The subfamily Cyrtinopsidinae is probably very closely related to the Eospiriferinae and the Cyrtiinae. INTRODUCTION Boucotinskia decemplicata (Hall, 1843) Rochester shale, Wenlockian, New York A. Boucot (1957) established a new genus Hedeina with Boucotinskia tenuilamellata(Muir-Wood, 1925) — Build- the type species Anomia crispa Linné, 1758 (10th ed., 1, was Formation, Wenlockian; Britain. the p. 702, fig. 7). Boucot, on assumption that the In the U. S.National Museum, Washington, two ofthese specimen figured by Linné (pi. 5, fig. 7) had been lost, species are present: B. sulcata from Gotland and B. selected a neotype for Anomia crispa being specimen decemplicata from New York. 2282 A of the Hisinger collection in the Swedish of the As a superficial investigation specimens showed Museum of Natural History, Paleozoological Depart- intermediate forms many between the two species, some ment. In 1967 Brunton and Cocks rediscovered the doubt about a taxonomie distinction between the two original Linné specimen of Anomia crispa and it species is justifiable. Moreover the micro-ornamentation appeared that this specimen belonged to the Cyrtiacea, as well as the internal structures of both species Cyrtiidae, Eospiriferinae, genus Macropleura Boucot, appeared to be identical. The question about the distinc- 1963. For priority reasons Anomia crispa Linné 1758 tion between the two species is in the scope of this must be named Hedeina crispa, Macropleura Boucot, publication not relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park
    Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park By Linda Sue Lassiter1, Justin S. Tweet2, Frederick A. Sundberg3, John R. Foster4, and P. J. Bergman5 1Northern Arizona University Department of Biological Sciences Flagstaff, Arizona 2National Park Service 9149 79th Street S. Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 3Museum of Northern Arizona Research Associate Flagstaff, Arizona 4Utah Field House of Natural History State Park Museum Vernal, Utah 5Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona Introduction As impressive as the Grand Canyon is to any observer from the rim, the river, or even from space, these cliffs and slopes are much more than an array of colors above the serpentine majesty of the Colorado River. The erosive forces of the Colorado River and feeder streams took millions of years to carve more than 290 million years of Paleozoic Era rocks. These exposures of Paleozoic Era sediments constitute 85% of the almost 5,000 km2 (1,903 mi2) of the Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and reveal important chronologic information on marine paleoecologies of the past. This expanse of both spatial and temporal coverage is unrivaled anywhere else on our planet. While many visitors stand on the rim and peer down into the abyss of the carved canyon depths, few realize that they are also staring at the history of life from almost 520 million years ago (Ma) where the Paleozoic rocks cover the great unconformity (Karlstrom et al. 2018) to 270 Ma at the top (Sorauf and Billingsley 1991). The Paleozoic rocks visible from the South Rim Visitors Center, are mostly from marine and some fluvial sediment deposits (Figure 5-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Formaçöes Prauf
    UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PA'ULO INSTITUTO DE GEOCIÊNCIAS ' INVERTEBRADOS NEOCARBONÍFEROS DAS FORMAçÖES prAuf (BACTA DO PARNAíBA) E ITAITUBA (BACIA DO AM AZONAS): TAXONOMIA; ANÁLISE cLADiSTIcA DAS SUBFAMíuINs oRtocRASSATE LLTNA E (CRASSATE LLACEA, BtvALVtA) E NEOSPIRIFERTNAE (SP|RTFEROtDEA, BRACHTOPODA). Luiz Eduardo Anelli Orientador: Prof. Dr, Antonio Carlos Rocha-Campos TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geologia Sedimentar SAO PAULO 1999 UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO tNsnruro DE cEoctÉrucns INVERTEBRADOS NEOCARBOruíTENOS DAS FORMAçÖES PNUÍ (BACIA DO PARNAÍAN¡ E ITAITUBA (BACIA DO AMAZONAS): TAXONOMIA; NruÁUSE CLADíSNCN DAS S U B FAM íINS O RI OC RASSATE LLI NAE (C RASSATE LLAC EA, BIVALVIA) E NEOSPIRIFERINAE (SPIRIFEROIDEA, BRACHTOPODA) LUIZ EDUARDO ANELLI orientador: Prof. Dr. Antonio carlos Rocha-campos TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO Tz+zz, coMtssno ¡ul-cADoRA Nome Presidente: Prof. Dr. Antonio Carlos Rocha-Campos Examinadores: Prof. Dr. Antônio Carlos Marques Prof. Dr. Nelson Bemardi Prof. Dr. Sergio Antônio Vanin Prof. Dr. Setembrino Petri SÃO PAULO 1 999 LINIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO INSTITUTO DE GEOCIÊNCIAS TNVERTEBRADoS NEocARBoNÍpEnos DAS FoRMAÇÕps pnuÍ (BACTA Do pARNaÍna¡ E rrArruBA (BACTA Do AMAZONAS): TAXONOMTA; ANÁrrSE CLADÍSTICA DAS S UBFAH¿ÍT n s oRI o CRA S SATELLINAE (CRA S SATELLACEA, BIVALVIA) E NEOSPIRIFERINAE (SPIRIFEROIDEA, BRACHTOPODA) Luiz Eduardo Anelli Orientador: Prof. Dr. Antonio Carlos Rocha-Campos T¿t z< TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geologia Sedimentar São Paulo r999 .................40 .................42 ,',.,',,',.,,,,',42 ................ 43 ¡1nelli, I990 - Sunário b O r b icul o ide a pri e t ana Chronic .............. 44 Classe Articulata Huxley, I 869...... .-........... 45 Schuchertellidae, Gen. e sp. ind ................................. 45 Classc Trilobita Walch................ .............. 46 Pallaclin plummeri (Kegel, 1951) n.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7.4: Functional Diversity of Marine Ecosystems After the Late Permian Mass Extinction Event
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2015 Palaeoecology of the late Permian mass extinction and subsequent recovery Foster, William J. http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5467 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Appendix 7.4: Functional diversity of marine ecosystems after the Late Permian mass extinction event Mode of Life assignments Table S1: Mode of Life assignments. In the functional columns each number corresponds to the model in Bambach et al. (S1), where for Tiering: 2 = erect; 3 = surficial; 4 = semi-infaunal; 5 = shallow infaunal; 6 = deep infaunal; for Motility: 1 = fast motile; 2 = slow motile; 3 = facultatively motile, unattached; 4 = facultatively motile, attached; 5 = stationary, unattached; 6 = stationary, attached; and for Feeding: 1 = suspension feeder; 2 = deposit feeder; 3 = miner; 4 = grazer; 5 = predator; 6 = other (i.e. chemosymbiosis).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Devonian), S.E
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1978 Paleoecology of the Spiriferid Brachiopods of the Silica Shale Formation (Middle Devonian), S.E. Michigan and N.W. Ohio Darioush T. Ghahremani Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Ghahremani, Darioush T., "Paleoecology of the Spiriferid Brachiopods of the Silica Shale Formation (Middle Devonian), S.E. Michigan and N.W. Ohio" (1978). Master's Theses. 2093. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/2093 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PALEOECOLDGY GF THE 5PIRIFERID BRACHIDPODS OF THE SILICA SHALE FORMATION (MIDDLE DEVONIAN), S.E, MICHIGAN AND N.W. OHIO by Darioush T, Ghahremani A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1978 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. AB5TRACT Spiriferid brachiopods of the Middle Devonian Silica Formation in northwestern Ohio and southeastern Michigan show many Features that are useful For paleoecologic in­ terpretation. This study is undertaken to examine and interpret the paleoecology and paleobiology of six spiri­ ferid brachiopods Mucrospirifer prolificus, Mucrospirifer grabaui, Mucrospirifer profundus, Mucrospirifer mucronatus, Paraspirifer bownockeri and Spinocyrtia euryteines. All are very abundant and can be easily collected from quarries in the Silica Formation near Sylvania, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • • Every Major Animal Phylum That Exists on Earth Today, As Well As A
    • Every major animal phylum that exists on Earth today, as well as a few more that have since become ex:nct, appeared within less than 10 million years during the early Cambrian evolu:onary radiaon, also called the Cambrian explosion. • Phylum Brachiopoda is represented by the brachiopods, marine animals that have calcareous or chi:no- phosphac shells, or valves, that surround a variety of internal organs and muscles. Brachiopod valves are hinged at the rear, while the front can be opened for feeding or closed for protec:on. In a typical brachiopod a stalk-like pedicle projects from an opening called a foramen in the larger ventral valve, aaching the animal to the seabed but clear of silt that would obstruct the opening. • Brachiopods have an epithelial mantle that secretes and lines the shell, and encloses the internal organs. The brachiopod body occupies only about one-third of the internal space inside the shell, nearest the hinge. Like bryozoans, brachiopods have a lophophore, a coil of tentacles whose cilia create currents that enables them to filter food par:cles out of the water. Unlike bryozoans, brachiopod lophophores are non-retractable and occupy up to two-thirds of the internal space, near the front where the valves gape when opened. • Some brachiopods have a calcareous brachidium that supports the lophophore. Terebratula Spiriferina Zeilleria • Two major groups of brachiopods are recognized, ar:culate and inar:culate. Arculate brachiopods have toothed hinges and simple muscles for opening and closing the two valves, while inar:culate brachiopods have untoothed hinges and a more complex system of muscles used to keep the valves aligned.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachiopods of the Bois Blanc Formation in New York
    Brachiopods of the Bois Blanc Formation in New York GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 584-B Brachiopods of the Bois Blanc Formation in New York By A. J. BOUCOT and]. G. JOHNSON STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE BOIS BLANC FORMATION IN NEW YORK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 584-B Lithofacies summary and paleogeography of Bois Blanc correlatives in eastern North America and description of silicified brachiopods from New York UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1968 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price 55 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ B1 Systematic paleontology-Continued Introduction ______________________________________ _ 1 Coelospira HalL _______________________________ _ B13 Age and correlation ________________________________ _ 1 Aferistina HalL ________________________________ _ 13 Lower Devonian rensselaeriid zonation _______________ _ 4 N ucleospira HalL ______________________________ _ 14 Paleogeo.5raphy and lithofacies of strata of Schoharie age __ 5 Acrospirifer Helmbrecht and Wedekind ___________ _ 14 Systematic paleontology ____________________________ _ 7 Afucrospirifer Grabau __________________________ _ 15 Petrocrania Raymond __________________________ _ 7 Kozlowskiellina Boucot _________________________ _ 16 Dalejina Havlicek ______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Middle Devonian (Givetian) Global Taghanic Biocrisis in Its
    The Late Middle Devonian (Givetian) Global Taghanic Biocrisis in its Type Region (Northern Appalachian Basin): Geologically Rapid Faunal Transitions Driven by Global and Local Environmental Changes A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Geology McMicken College of Arts and Sciences August 9th, 2011 by James Joseph Zambito IV M.S., University at Buffalo, 2006 B.S., SUNY College at Brockport, 2004 Dissertation Committee Dr. Carlton E. Brett, Chair Dr. Arnold I. Miller Dr. David L. Meyer Dr. Thomas J. Algeo Dr. Gordon C. Baird Dr. Alex J. Bartholomew Abstract The late Middle Devonian Global Taghanic Biocrisis marks the onset of extinction and a loss of faunal endemism that culminated in the subsequent Frasnian-Famennian extinction. Global environmental changes recognized at this time include increased warming and aridity, as well as rapid eustatic sea level fluctuations. In the type region, the northern Appalachian Basin, the biocrisis is recorded within the deposits of the uppermost Hamilton, Tully, and lowermost Genesee Groups over an interval of ~0.5 million years. A high-resolution stratigraphic framework reconstructed along a complete onshore through offshore gradient has resulted in the recognition of three main pulses (bioevents) of faunal transition in the type region: 1) the incursion of the tropical Tully Fauna into eastern Laurentia and temporary loss of the endemic Hamilton Fauna; 2) Tully Fauna extermination and replacement by a recurrent Hamilton Fauna; and, ultimately, 3) extinction of large portions of the Hamilton Fauna and the beginning of cosmopolitan Genesee Fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiriferida, Trigonotretidae) from Ixtaltepec Formation, Pennsylvanian of Oaxaca State, Southern Mexico
    NeospiriferinidBlackwell Publishing Ltd brachiopods (Spiriferida, Trigonotretidae) from Ixtaltepec Formation, Pennsylvanian of Oaxaca State, Southern Mexico MIGUEL A. TORRES-MARTÍNEZ, FRANCISCO SOUR-TOVAR AND ALBERTO PÉREZ-HUERTA Torres-Martínez, M.A., Sour-Tovar, F. & Pérez-Huerta A. 2008: Neospiriferinid brachiopods (Spiriferida, Trigonotretidae) from Ixtaltepec Formation, Pennsylvanian of Oaxaca State, Southern Mexico. Fossils and Strata, No. 54, pp. 157–166. ISSN 0024-1164 The brachiopods of the Subfamily Neospiriferinae (Order Spiriferida) Neospirifer dunbari, N. pantojai n. sp., N. amplia n. sp., Septospirifer mazateca n. sp. and ?Septospirifer sp. are described for Pennsylvanian rocks of southern Mexico. The material was recovered from the type section of the Ixtaltepec Formation, near the town of Santiago Ixtaltepec, in Oaxaca State. Mexican Neospirifer species are associated with the Neospirifer cameratus- dunbari lineage, a typical North American group, and their presence in Oaxaca con- firms the Morrowan-Desmoinesian age for the Ixtaltepec Formation and the faunistic similarity that exists between Carboniferous faunas from southern Mexico and those from the Midcontinent region of North America. Septospirifer species represent the first record of the genus for Mexico and the third occurrence worldwide. ᮀ Brachiopods, Mexico, neospiriferids, Neospirifer, Pennsylvanian, Septospirifer. M.A. Torres-Martínez and F. Sour-Tovar [[email protected]], Museo de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad Universitaria, México D. F., 04510, México, A. Pérez-Huerta, Department of Geographical & Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Glasgow, UK. The genera included in the Subfamily Neospiriferinae, Geographical setting as proposed by Carter et al. (1994), represent a group of brachiopods for which a clear taxonomic position Fossils described in this work were collected in the has not yet been reached among brachiopod workers.
    [Show full text]