DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0810.5724V1 [Cond-Mat.Soft]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:0810.5724V1 [Cond-Mat.Soft] Spherical Foams in Flat Space Carl D. Modes and Randall D. Kamien Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6396, USA (Dated: July 10, 2018) Regular tesselations of space are characterized through their Schl¨afli symbols p,q,r , where each cell has regular p-gonal sides, q meeting at each vertex, and r meeting on each{ edge.} Regular tesselations with symbols p, 3, 3 all satisfy Plateau’s laws for equilibrium foams. For general p, however, these regular tesselations{ } do not embed in Euclidean space, but require a uniform back- ground curvature. We study a class of regular foams on S3 which, through conformal, stereographic projection to R3 define irregular cells consistent with Plateau’s laws. We analytically characterize a broad classes of bulk foam bubbles, and extend and explain recent observations on foam structure and shape distribution. Our approach also allows us to comment on foam stability by identifying a 3 weak local maximum of A 2 /V at the maximally symmetric tetrahedral bubble that participates in T2 rearrangements. From beer to bread, metals to mousse, and shav- ing cream to souffles, foams are space-and mouth-filling structures which arise in a broad array of applied con- texts. Interest in foams has grown [1, 2] as they have been used to model many other systems: from copolymers and fuzzy colloids [3, 4], to the Edwards’ picture of granular matter [5], and even to space-time and cosmology [6, 7]. Unfortunately, the details of a foam’s bulk interior have long evaded both direct experimental probe [8] and ex- haustive theoretical treatment [9]. At issue is the topo- logical complexity of the network of foam bubble borders and the interaction of these borders with light, along with the disorder promoted by the incompatibility of Plateau’s laws with space-filling regular polyhedra. Recall that Plateau posited [10, 11] that three-dimensional dry foams would satisfy two rules: 1) each vertex terminates four FIG. 1: A simple flat (though non-conformal) projection of 1 1 the 120-cell into R3. Darker lines are projected closer to the edges, each an angle δ = cos− ( 3 ) apart from the other, and 2) each edge is the border of− three faces, and the di- origin, lighter lines further. Note the dodecahedral nature of the cells and their foam-like coordination. hedral angle between these faces is 2π/3. In this letter we study the properties of a large class of bubbles that extend the notion of “isotropic Plateau polyhedra” [12] that, in some cases, this type of frustration may be lifted or “average -hedra” [13] which we will call “average by the introduction of a background curvature to the sys- polyhedra” inN the following. We determine both the area tem [18, 19]. In order to progress along these lines in the A and volume V of these cells and find that specific area, 3 case of foams, it is expedient to consider Plateau’s laws A 2 /V is nearly constant for the class of dodecahedral in a language that allows for a simple connection to the and tetrahedral bubbles, with the exception of a weak curvature. That language is the geometric language of local maximum around the symmetric tetrahedron. Our regular tesselations of space [20]. To classify such tes- arXiv:0810.5724v1 [cond-mat.soft] 31 Oct 2008 more general approach is a new step toward understand- selations we use the Schl¨afli symbols, p,q,r , where p ing the statistics of random foams [14], and the land- is the number of edges on each face of{ the cell,} q is the scape near the symmetric 4-sided bubble offers insight number of these faces meeting at each vertex of one cell, into foam evolution at finite temperature. The projec- and r is the number of cells or faces meeting around each tions that we make are all Plateau-law-abiding foams. edge. By way of example, the only such tesselation al- The story in two dimensions is qualitatively different: lowed in flat space is the cubic honeycomb. Since the there the decoration theorem [15] and the von Neumann- cells are cubes, p = 4 and q = 3; four cubes fit together Mullins growth law [16] provide a coherent and useful around an edge, and hence the Schl¨afli symbol is 4, 3, 4 . description of foams. In three-dimensions, geometrical The cubic honeycomb does not satisfy Plateau’s{ rules as} frustration cuts our understanding at its core – indeed, four faces meet at an edge. The requirement of dihedral only recently was the growth law generalized above two angles of 2π/3 implies that r = 3. Since each vertex dimensions [17] and there are no regular tesselations of must terminate four edges, it follows that each cell must R3 which satisfy Plateau’s laws. Happily, it is well known have three such edges and thus q = 3. Thus we see that 2 any regular space tesselation of the form p, 3, 3 neces- sarily represents a valid foam. If we divide{ each}p-gonal face into p isoceles triangles, each will have one angle of δ 2π/p and two angles 2 . On a uniformly curved space of constant sectional curvature K, this triangle, ∆, lies in a two-manifold of curvature K. The Gauss-Bonnet theorem relates the excess angle of the triangle to the integrated curvature: 2π 1 1 1 +2 cos− π = KdA (1) p × 2 −3 − Z∆ In the flat limit K = 0 and thus p 5.1043; real foams ≈ FIG. 2: (color online). The foam-like tetrahedral covering are known to have 5.1 sides per face on average [8, 21] of the sphere and its Reuleaux Triangle image under stereo- ∼ as do the average polyhedra [12, 13]. Of course, p must be graphic projection from a vertex. The full family of possible a positive integer and the theory of polytopes [20] limits conformal distortions of this triangle is accessible by direct us to p 5 (we shun the frumious horocycle – 6, 3, 3 ). geometric calculation. It follows≤ that the regular polytopes can be embedded{ } in a three-space with K > 0, i.e. the three-sphere, S3. These “polychora” are the analogs of the two-dimensional that can fit in a two-dimensional foam. If, for instance, tilings of S2 which correspond to the platonic solids. We we project through (0, 0, 1), then the top vertex is pro- choose to study two tesselations of S3, the so-called 5- jected to infinity and the remaining three vertices become √3 1 √3 1 1 cell, 3, 3, 3 and the 120-cell, 5, 3, 3 (Figure 1). The ′ = ( , − ), ( − , − ), (0, ) . Since great cir- { } { } T { 2√2 2√2 2√2 2√2 √2 } 120-cell is of interest because this regular polytope re- cles map to circles or lines, the edges of the tetrahedron quires the least amount of background curvature to real- become arcs of circles and, by symmetry, we have the fa- ize among the family in question. Meanwhile, the 5-cell mous Reuleaux Triangle [25], familiar in two-dimensional is worthwhile because it features tetrahedral bubbles like foams as the ideal corner bubble during T2 topological those seen at “T2” topological rearrangements, where a rearrangements. Were we to project from another point, foam bubble shrinks until it disappears, leaving behind or equivalently, rotate the sphere and project through the a four-fold vertex [9]. Related constructions have been pole, we would find asymmetric foams. Moreover, it is used to show the uniqueness of k-bubble clusters in d not just the central bubble that satisfies Plateau’s laws; dimensions [22]. the entire projection is guaranteed to have all the correct But how can we make contact with physical foams re- angles for an equilibrium foam. The central cell on which siding in actual, flat space? We observe that the con- we focus could exist in any equilibrium R3 foam. straints of Plateau’s laws that forced the form p, 3, 3 R2 { } Working in , we can calculate both the perime- are all constraints on angles, hence mappings from the ter and area of a general triangular bubble in a two- R3 3-sphere to that preserve angles will also preserve dimensional foam. Here Plateau’s rules are greatly sim- Plateau’s laws. We choose here to work with the con- plified: edges must be arcs of circles and must meet at formal stereographic projection, long familiar to cartog- an angle of 2π/3. In order to parameterize an arbitrary raphers [23] where X = x/(1 w), Y = y/(1 w), and − − triangle, we set two of the vertices at ( 1, 0) and (1, 0), Z = z/(1 w) where X,Y,Z are cartesian coordinates and allow the third to float as (x, y), where− x and y are − R3 in the target , and x,y,z,w are the coordinates in both non-negative. It is tedious but straightforward to S3 R4 with x2 + y2 + z2 + w2 = 1. ⊂ calculate both the perimeter and the area as a function In two dimensions, this projection is the standard of x and y. The exact formulae are complicated and the S2 R2 stereographic projection of to and we may project results are better characterized graphically in Figure 3. the p, 3 Platonic solids (the tetrahedron, cube, and The machinery carries through in exactly the same dodecahedron){ } onto the plane. For concreteness, we way in the three dimensional case as well, allowing us will consider the 3, 3 tetrahedron shown in Fig. 2; to produce a continuous family of space foam bubbles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petrie Schemes
    Canad. J. Math. Vol. 57 (4), 2005 pp. 844–870 Petrie Schemes Gordon Williams Abstract. Petrie polygons, especially as they arise in the study of regular polytopes and Coxeter groups, have been studied by geometers and group theorists since the early part of the twentieth century. An open question is the determination of which polyhedra possess Petrie polygons that are simple closed curves. The current work explores combinatorial structures in abstract polytopes, called Petrie schemes, that generalize the notion of a Petrie polygon. It is established that all of the regular convex polytopes and honeycombs in Euclidean spaces, as well as all of the Grunbaum–Dress¨ polyhedra, pos- sess Petrie schemes that are not self-intersecting and thus have Petrie polygons that are simple closed curves. Partial results are obtained for several other classes of less symmetric polytopes. 1 Introduction Historically, polyhedra have been conceived of either as closed surfaces (usually topo- logical spheres) made up of planar polygons joined edge to edge or as solids enclosed by such a surface. In recent times, mathematicians have considered polyhedra to be convex polytopes, simplicial spheres, or combinatorial structures such as abstract polytopes or incidence complexes. A Petrie polygon of a polyhedron is a sequence of edges of the polyhedron where any two consecutive elements of the sequence have a vertex and face in common, but no three consecutive edges share a commonface. For the regular polyhedra, the Petrie polygons form the equatorial skew polygons. Petrie polygons may be defined analogously for polytopes as well. Petrie polygons have been very useful in the study of polyhedra and polytopes, especially regular polytopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs
    Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs George Olshevsky TETRACOMB is a four-dimensional tessellation. In any tessellation, the honeycells, which are the n-dimensional polytopes that tessellate the space, Amust by definition adjoin precisely along their facets, that is, their ( n!1)- dimensional elements, so that each facet belongs to exactly two honeycells. In the case of tetracombs, the honeycells are four-dimensional polytopes, or polychora, and their facets are polyhedra. For a tessellation to be uniform, the honeycells must all be uniform polytopes, and the vertices must be transitive on the symmetry group of the tessellation. Loosely speaking, therefore, the vertices must be “surrounded all alike” by the honeycells that meet there. If a tessellation is such that every point of its space not on a boundary between honeycells lies in the interior of exactly one honeycell, then it is panoploid. If one or more points of the space not on a boundary between honeycells lie inside more than one honeycell, the tessellation is polyploid. Tessellations may also be constructed that have “holes,” that is, regions that lie inside none of the honeycells; such tessellations are called holeycombs. It is possible for a polyploid tessellation to also be a holeycomb, but not for a panoploid tessellation, which must fill the entire space exactly once. Polyploid tessellations are also called starcombs or star-tessellations. Holeycombs usually arise when (n!1)-dimensional tessellations are themselves permitted to be honeycells; these take up the otherwise free facets that bound the “holes,” so that all the facets continue to belong to two honeycells. In this essay, as per its title, we are concerned with just the uniform panoploid tetracombs.
    [Show full text]
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits
    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
    [Show full text]
  • Coloring Uniform Honeycombs
    Bridges 2009: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture Coloring Uniform Honeycombs Glenn R. Laigo, [email protected] Ma. Louise Antonette N. De las Peñas, [email protected] Mathematics Department, Ateneo de Manila University Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines René P. Felix, [email protected] Institute of Mathematics, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines Abstract In this paper, we discuss a method of arriving at colored three-dimensional uniform honeycombs. In particular, we present the construction of perfect and semi-perfect colorings of the truncated and bitruncated cubic honeycombs. If G is the symmetry group of an uncolored honeycomb, a coloring of the honeycomb is perfect if the group H consisting of elements that permute the colors of the given coloring is G. If H is such that [ G : H] = 2, we say that the coloring of the honeycomb is semi-perfect . Background In [7, 9, 12], a general framework has been presented for coloring planar patterns. Focus was given to the construction of perfect colorings of semi-regular tilings on the hyperbolic plane. In this work, we will extend the method of coloring two dimensional patterns to obtain colorings of three dimensional uniform honeycombs. There is limited literature on colorings of three-dimensional honeycombs. We see studies on colorings of polyhedra; for instance, in [17], a method of coloring shown is by cutting the polyhedra and laying it flat to produce a pattern on a two-dimensional plane. In this case, only the faces of the polyhedra are colored. In [6], enumeration problems on colored patterns on polyhedra are discussed and solutions are obtained by applying Burnside's counting theorem.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Modular Sculpture Systems
    Bridges 2017 Conference Proceedings Designing Modular Sculpture Systems Christopher Carlson Wolfram Research, Inc 100 Trade Centre Drive Champaign, IL, 61820, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We are interested in the sculptural possibilities of closed chains of modular units. One such system is embodied in MathMaker, a set of wooden pieces that can be connected end-to-end to create a fascinating variety of forms. MathMaker is based on a cubic honeycomb. We explore the possibilities of similar systems based on octahedral- tetrahedral, rhombic dodecahedral, and truncated octahedral honeycombs. Introduction The MathMaker construction kit consists of wooden parallelepipeds that can be connected end-to-end to make a great variety of sculptural forms [1]. Figure 1 shows on the left an untitled sculpture by Koos Verhoeff based on that system of modular units [2]. MathMaker derives from a cubic honeycomb. Each unit connects the center of one cubic face to the center of an adjacent face (Figure 1, center). Units connect via square planar faces which echo the square faces of cubes in the honeycomb. The square connecting faces can be matched in 4 ways via 90° rotation, so from any position each adjacent cubic face is accessible. A chain of MathMaker units jumps from cube to adjacent cube, adjacent units never traversing the same cube. A variant of MathMaker called “turned cross mitre” has units whose square cross-sections are rotated 45° about their central axes relative to the standard MathMaker units (Figure 1, right). Although the underlying cubic honeycomb structure is the same, the change in unit yields structures with strikingly different visual impressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Totally Separable Sphere Packings Arxiv:1506.04171V1
    Regular Totally Separable Sphere Packings Samuel Reid∗ September 5, 2018 Abstract The topic of totally separable sphere packings is surveyed with a focus on regular constructions, uniform tilings, and contact number problems. An enumeration of all 2 3 4 regular totally separable sphere packings in R , R , and R which are based on convex uniform tessellations, honeycombs, and tetracombs, respectively, is presented, as well d as a construction of a family of regular totally separable sphere packings in R that is not based on a convex uniform d-honeycomb for d ≥ 3. Keywords: sphere packings, hyperplane arrangements, contact numbers, separability. MSC 2010 Subject Classifications: Primary 52B20, Secondary 14H52. 1 Introduction In the 1940s, P. Erd¨osintroduced the notion of a separable set of domains in the plane, which gained the attention of H. Hadwiger in [1]. G.F. T´othand L.F. T´othextended this notion to totally separable domains and proved the densest totally separable arrangement of congruent copies of a domain is given by a lattice packing of the domains generated by the side-vectors of a parallelogram of least area containing a domain [2]. Totally separable domains are also mentioned by G. Kert´eszin [3], where it is proved that a cube of volume V contains a totally separable set of N balls of radius r with V ≥ 8Nr3. Further results and references regarding separability can be found in a manuscript of J. Pach and G. Tardos [4]. arXiv:1506.04171v1 [math.MG] 6 Jun 2015 This manuscript continues the study of separability in the context of regular unit sphere packings, i.e., infinite sets of unit spheres 1 [ d−1 P = xi + S i=1 ∗University of Calgary, Centre for Computational and Discrete Geometry (Department of Math- ematics & Statistics), and Thangadurai Group (Department of Chemistry), Calgary, AB, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Pascal Pyramid Arxiv:1511.02067V2 [Math.CO] 9
    Hyperbolic Pascal pyramid L´aszl´oN´emeth∗ Abstract In this paper we introduce a new type of Pascal's pyramids. The new object is called hyperbolic Pascal pyramid since the mathematical background goes back to the regular cube mosaic (cubic honeycomb) in the hyperbolic space. The definition of the hyperbolic Pascal pyramid is a natural generalization of the definition of hyperbolic Pascal triangle ([2]) and Pascal's arithmetic pyramid. We describe the growing of hyperbolic Pascal pyramid considering the numbers and the values of the elements. Further figures illustrate the stepping from a level to the next one. Key Words: Pascal pyramid, cubic honeycomb, regular cube mosaic in hyperbolic space. MSC code: 52C22, 05B45, 11B99. 1 Introduction There are several approaches to generalize the Pascal's arithmetic triangle (see, for instance [3]). A new type of variations of it is based on the hyperbolic regular mosaics denoted by Schl¨afli’ssymbol fp; qg, where (p−2)(q−2) > 4 ([5]). Each regular mosaic induces a so called hyperbolic Pascal triangle (see [2, 7]), following and generalizing the connection between the classical Pascal's triangle and the Euclidean regular square mosaic f4; 4g. For more details see [2], but here we also collect some necessary information. The hyperbolic Pascal triangle based on the mosaic fp; qg can be figured as a digraph, where the vertices and the edges are the vertices and the edges of a well defined part of arXiv:1511.02067v2 [math.CO] 9 Nov 2015 lattice fp; qg, respectively, and the vertices possess a value that give the number of different shortest paths from the base vertex to the given vertex.
    [Show full text]
  • Families of Tessellations of Space by Elementary Polyhedra Via Retessellations of Face-Centered-Cubic and Related Tilings
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E 86, 041141 (2012) Families of tessellations of space by elementary polyhedra via retessellations of face-centered-cubic and related tilings Ruggero Gabbrielli* Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Computational Science, Department of Physics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy and Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA Yang Jiao† Physical Science in Oncology Center and Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA Salvatore Torquato‡ Department of Chemistry, Department of Physics, Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics and Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA (Received 7 August 2012; published 22 October 2012) The problem of tiling or tessellating (i.e., completely filling) three-dimensional Euclidean space R3 with polyhedra has fascinated people for centuries and continues to intrigue mathematicians and scientists today. Tilings are of fundamental importance to the understanding of the underlying structures for a wide range of systems in the biological, chemical, and physical sciences. In this paper, we enumerate and investigate the most comprehensive set of tilings of R3 by any two regular polyhedra known to date. We find that among all of the Platonic solids, only the tetrahedron and octahedron can be combined to tile R3. For tilings composed of only congruent tetrahedra and congruent octahedra, there seem to be only four distinct ratios between the sides of the two polyhedra. These four canonical periodic tilings are, respectively, associated with certain packings of tetrahedra (octahedra) in which the holes are octahedra (tetrahedra).
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Assembly of a Space-Tessellating Struc- Ture in the Binary System of Hard Tetrahedra and Octahedra†
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 Supplementary Information: Self-assembly of a space-tessellating struc- ture in the binary system of hard tetrahedra and octahedra† A. T. Cadotte,a‡, J. Dshemuchadse,b‡ P. F. Damasceno,a§ R. S. Newman,b and S. C. Glotzer∗a;b;c;d Structure analysis with bond order diagrams 4-fold 3-fold 2-fold The crystal structures observed in this study were an- alyzed primarily by visual inspection. However, bond- orientational order diagrams (BODs) 1 were also found to 2 be instructive, especially when investigating structural sub- -OT c tleties. In the binary structure, the BODs were also gener- ated both for the mixture of polyhedra and for tetrahedra and octahedra separately. In the binary crystal, the centers of the tetrahedra form a simple cubic lattice, and the octa- (T) hedra form a face-centered cubic lattice. The BODs of the 2 binary structure and the octahedra packings are shown in -OT Fig. S1, the ones of the dodecagonal quasicrystal in Fig. S2. c The quasicrystal of tetrahedra has a particular signature in the BOD, resembling a cylinder and resulting in dark spots aligned with the 12-fold axis of the dodecagonal structure. (O) Quasicrystal binary-crystal coexistence 2 -OT Small numbers of octahedra that are present in a sim- c ulation of mainly tetrahedra have a preferred alignment within the quasicrystal. In some cases, they form five- rings, alternating with pentagonal bipyramids of tetrahe- dra, similar to a model of dodecagonal Al–Mn 2–4, as shown -O in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Math.GT] 29 Nov 2017 Embedded in Skeletons (Or Scaffoldings) of the Canonical Cubical Honeycombs of an Euclidean Or Hyperbolic Space
    Topological surfaces as gridded surfaces in geometrical spaces. Juan Pablo D´ıaz,∗ Gabriela Hinojosa, Alberto Verjosvky, y November 27, 2017 Abstract In this paper we study topological surfaces as gridded surfaces in the 2-dimensional scaffolding of cubic honeycombs in Euclidean and hy- perbolic spaces. Keywords: Cubulated surfaces, gridded surfaces, euclidean and hyperbolic honeycombs. AMS subject classification: Primary 57Q15, Secondary 57Q25, 57Q05. 1 Introduction The category of cubic complexes and cubic maps is similar to the simplicial category. The only difference consists in considering cubes of different di- mensions instead of simplexes. In this context, a cubulation of a manifold is a cubical complex which is PL homeomorphic to the manifold (see [4], [7], [12]). In this paper we study the realizations of cubulations of manifolds arXiv:1703.06944v2 [math.GT] 29 Nov 2017 embedded in skeletons (or scaffoldings) of the canonical cubical honeycombs of an euclidean or hyperbolic space. In [1] it was shown the following theorem: ∗This work was supported by FORDECYT 265667 (M´exico) yThis work was partially supported by CONACyT (M´exico),CB-2009-129280 and PA- PIIT (Universidad Nacional Aut´onomade M´exico)#IN106817. 1 Theorem 1.1. Let M; N ⊂ Rn+2, N ⊂ M, be closed and smooth subman- ifolds of Rn+2 such that dimension (M) = n + 1 and dimension (N) = n. Suppose that N has a trivial normal bundle in M (i.e., N is a two-sided hy- persurface of M). Then there exists an ambient isotopy of Rn+2 which takes M into the (n+1)-skeleton of the canonical cubulation C of Rn+2 and N into the n-skeleton of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Distance Functions on Three-Dimensional Grids
    Accepted Manuscript Digital distance functions on three-dimensional grids Robin Strand, Benedek Nagy, Gunilla Borgefors PII: S0304-3975(10)00589-X DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2010.10.027 Reference: TCS 8041 To appear in: Theoretical Computer Science Please cite this article as: R. Strand, B. Nagy, G. Borgefors, Digital distance functions on three-dimensional grids, Theoretical Computer Science (2010), doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2010.10.027 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Asa service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Manuscript Digital Distance Functions on Three-Dimensional Grids a, b c Robin Strand ∗, Benedek Nagy , Gunilla Borgefors aCentre for Image Analysis, Uppsala University, Sweden bDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, Hungary cCentre for Image Analysis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden Abstract In this paper, we examine five different three-dimensional grids suited for image processing. Digital distance functions are defined on the cubic, face- centered cubic, body-centered cubic, honeycomb, and diamond grids. We give the parameters that minimize an error function that favors distance functions with low rotational dependency. We also give an algorithm for computing the distance transform – the tool by which these distance func- tions can be applied in image processing applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Combinatorially Two-Orbit Convex Polytopes 3
    COMBINATORIALLY TWO-ORBIT CONVEX POLYTOPES NICHOLAS MATTEO Abstract. Any convex polytope whose combinatorial automorphism group has two orbits on the flags is isomorphic to one whose group of Euclidean symmetries has two orbits on the flags (equivalently, to one whose automorphism group and symmetry group coincide). Hence, a combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope is isomorphic to one of a known finite list, all of which are 3-dimensional: the cuboctahedron, icosidodecahedron, rhombic dodecahedron, or rhombic triacontahedron. The same is true of combinatorially two-orbit normal face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes. 1. Introduction Regular polytopes are those whose symmetry groups act transitively on their flags (see Section 2 for definitions; throughout this article, “polytope” means convex polytope.) We say that a polytope whose symmetry group has k orbits on the flags is a k-orbit polytope, so the regular polytopes are the one-orbit polytopes. The one-orbit polytopes in the plane (the regular polygons) and in 3-space (the Platonic solids) have been known for millenia; the six one-orbit 4-polytopes and the three one-orbit d-polytopes for every d 5 have been known since the 19th century. In [7], the author found all the≥ two-orbit polytopes. These exist only in the plane and in 3-space. In the plane, there are two infinite families, one consisting of the irregular isogonal polygons, and the other consisting of the irregular isotoxal polygons. Here, isogonal means that the symmetry group acts transitively on the vertices, and isotoxal means that the symmetry group acts transitively on the edges.
    [Show full text]