Annual Report and Accounts 2008
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Future of CDC
House of Commons International Development Committee The Future of CDC Fifth Report of Session 2010–11 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/indcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed Tuesday 15 February 2011 HC 607 Published on 3 March 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The International Development Committee Rt Hon. Malcolm Bruce MP, (Liberal Democrat, Gordon) (Chairman) Hugh Bayley MP, (Labour, City of York) Richard Burden MP, (Labour, Birmingham, Northfield) Sam Gyimah MP (Conservative, East Surrey) Richard Harrington MP, (Conservative, Watford) Pauline Latham MP, (Conservative, Mid Derbyshire) Jeremy Lefroy (Conservative, Stafford) Mr Michael McCann MP, (Labour, East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow) Alison McGovern MP, (Labour, Wirral South) Anas Sarwar MP, (Labour, Glasgow Central) Chris White MP, (Conservative, Warwick and Leamington) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Mr Russell Brown MP, (Labour, Dumfries, Galloway) Mr James Clappison MP, (Conservative, Hertsmere) Ann McKechin MP, (Labour, Glasgow North) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/indcom Committee staff The staff of the Committee are David Harrison (Clerk), Mick Hillyard (Second Clerk), Anna Dickson (Committee Specialist), Chlöe Challender (Committee Specialist), Tony Catinella (Senior Committee Assistant), Susan Monaghan (Senior Committee Assistant), Vanessa Hallinan (Committee Assistant), Emily Harrisson (Inquiry Manager) and Nicholas Davies (Media Officer) Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the International Development Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. -
Bricks and Mortar
MORE THAN BRICKS AND MORTAR Infrastructure-as-asset-class: Financing development or developing finance? A Critical Look at Private Equity Infrastructure Funds1 by Nicholas Hildyard The Corner House2 1 Sources for further information, including hyperlinks, have been given throughout this report where possible. Website addresses were correct at the time of writing. Please notify The Corner House of any broken link: enquiries AT thecornerhouse.org.uk 2 The author would like to thank Isabella Besedova, Theodoros Chronopoulos, Peter Frankental, Jutta Kill, Tom Lines, Larry Lohmann, Doug Norlen, Sarah Sexton, Antonio Tricarico and Beck Wallace for their invaluable comments on early drafts of this paper. 1 “When the capital development of a country becomes the by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.” John Maynard Keynes, General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, 1936 “The last quarter century of ‘deregulation’ involved the introduction of a vast array of new legal mechanisms and regulations by national governments to protect the interests of investors and shareholders. This must be dismantled; and new legal mechanisms and regulations must be introduced nationally to subordinate investment capital to democratic requirements established in international human rights standards.” Peter Rossman and Gerard Greenfield, Financialization: New Routes to Profit, New Challenges for Trade Unions, 20061 Introduction Political discourse is often conducted in code. Where policy proposals or actions are likely to engender strong opposition or cause affront to the public, euphemisms are used (“collateral damage” for “dead civilians”, “land disturbance” for “mining”, “environmental enhancement” for “canalising rivers”)2 or concepts are employed that direct the conversation elsewhere. -
Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited
PROSPECTUS – TRANCHE 2 Dated January 4, 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited (the “Company”), with CIN L65191TN1997PLC037415, incorporated in the Republic of India with limited liability under the Companies Act, 1956, as amended (the “Companies Act”)) Registered Office: KRM Tower, 8th Floor, No.1 Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600 031 Tel: (91 44) 4564 4000; Fax: (91 44) 2854 7597 Corporate Office: Naman Chambers, C-32, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051 Tel: (91 22) 4222 2000; Fax: (91 22) 2654 0354 Compliance Officer and Contact Person: Mahendra N. Shah, Company Secretary E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.idfc.com PUBLIC ISSUE BY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (“COMPANY” OR “ISSUER”) OF LONG TERM INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS OF FACE VALUE OF RS. 5,000 EACH, IN THE NATURE OF SECURED, REDEEMABLE, NON-CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, HAVING BENEFITS UNDER SECTION 80 CCF OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE “BONDS”), NOT EXCEEDING RS. 34,000 MILLION FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010 - 2011. THE BONDS WILL BE ISSUED IN ONE OR MORE TRANCHES SUBJECT TO THE OVERALL LIMIT OF RS. 34,000 MILLION FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010- 2011 UNDER THE SHELF PROSPECTUS FILED WITH THE STOCK EXCHANGES AND SEBI ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2010. THE SECOND TRANCHE OF THE BONDS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING RS. 29,289.64 MILLION (THE “ISSUE”) SHALL BE ISSUED ON THE TERMS SET OUT IN THIS PROSPECTUS TRANCHE – 2. The Issue is being made pursuant to the provisions of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, as amended (the “SEBI Debt Regulations”). -
Envisioning New Partnerships for Africa's Future
ENvISIONING NEW PARTNERSHIPS FOR AFRICA’S FuTuRE: MAkING GLOBAL GOvERNANCE WORk IN A POST-2015 WORLD Dominik Balthasar / Hannah Bowen / Clara Brandi / Kathrin Hamm / Whitney Haring-Smith / Ginger Turner Yuzhe Wang / Jiajun Xu SEPTEMBER 2013 BERLIN GG2022.NET BEIJING WASHINGTON DC Supported by Partners WWW.GG2022.NET ENVISIONING NEW PARTNERSHIPS FOR AFrica’s FuturE: MAKING GLOBAL GOVERNANCE WORK IN A POST-2015 WORLD _ TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE REPORT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 7 SCENARIO 1: AFRICA LEFT BEHIND 9 SCENARIO 2: CUT-THROAT COMPETITION 15 SCENARIO 3: AFRICA RISING 22 STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS 30 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2013 35 FELLOWS OF THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT 38 GOVERNANCE WORKING GROUP APPENDIX 1: SCENARIO PLANNING METHODOLOGY 41 APPENDIX 2: GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE TODAY 45 GLOBAL GOVERNANCE 2022 _ ACRONYMS ANC African National Congress, South Africa AU African Union BIS Bank for International Settlements BITs Bilateral Investment Treaties BRIC Brazil, Russia, India, China BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa CDA Citizen Development Assistance DAC Development Assistance Committee, Development Cooperation Directorate, OECD DCF United Nations Development Cooperation Forum EAC East African Community ECOSOC Economic and Social Council ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative FDI Foreign Direct Investment FSF Financial Stability Forum GDP Gross Domestic Product GEC Global Economic Council GNI Gross National Income IFC International Financial Corporation, -
CDC Group Plc Financial Review 2009 Our Mission Is to Foster Growth in Sustainable Businesses, Helping to Raise Living Standards in Developing Countries
CDC Group plc Financial Review 2009 Our mission is to foster growth in sustainable businesses, helping to raise living standards in developing countries. Our investment policy is to make more than 75% of new investments in low income countries* and to invest more than 50% of our funds in sub-Saharan Africa. Contents 2 Statement from the Chairman 4 Our Business 12 Statement from the Chief Executive 14 Board of Directors 16 Business Review – Africa 18 Business Review – Asia 20 Performance Review 28 CDC Universe * Those with an annual gross national income (GNI) per capita of less than US$905. CDC Group plc Financial Review 2009 1 2009 Highlights £359m New investments in developing countries, 61% in Africa £207m Total return after tax £742m1 Other capital mobilised £162m Portfolio cash generated for re-investment in developing countries £1,411m Portfolio of fund investments £207m New commitments to funds in a difficult period for fundraising £1,561m Outstanding commitments to funds 794 Underlying portfolio companies located in 71 countries CDC’s Investment Code Process externally audited for the first time 1 See page 22 for an explanation of how mobilisation is measured. 2 CDC Group plc Financial Review 2009 Statement from the Chairman Richard Gillingwater CBE In the deepest recession that we’ve 2009 also saw the first year of had in many decades in developed CDC’s new investment policy, markets, the emerging markets which the organisation has fully in which CDC invests its capital embraced. The new policy, which showed some positive growth and takes us through to the end of a steady return to financial stability 2013, targets 75% of CDC’s new in 2009. -
Entrepreneurial Action and the Emergence of China’S Private Solar Photovoltaic Firms
*** Forthcoming in Research Policy *** OVERCOMING THE LIABILITY OF NEWNESS: ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION AND THE EMERGENCE OF CHINA’S PRIVATE SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC FIRMS Wei Zhang Associate Professor & Steven White Associate Professor Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship & Strategy School of Economics and Management Tsinghua University Abstract This study explores how entrepreneurs introducing a new organizational form can build legitimacy and capabilities to overcome significant liabilities of newness, and how their actions and the institutional structure co-evolve. Our multiple case study design enabled us to explicate specific actions that entrepreneurs founding China’s private solar photovoltaic (PV) firms took as they built organizational capabilities and established their legitimacy vis- à-vis resource holders and global markets. We identified three legitimacy-based strategies they used: leveraging their existing sources of legitimacy, aligning their actions with established institutional rules and norms, and enacting the institutional environment to change perceptions of what is legitimate. We also found a stark contrast between the early and late entrants. The early entrants had to build an effective organizational capability and establish their own firm’s legitimacy, as well as establish the legitimacy of the private Chinese solar PV firm as a viable organizational form, both domestically and abroad. Later entrants could leverage the legitimacy established by the early entrants, enabling them to more easily and quickly access external resources and become competitive. Our findings also suggest an important role for government in promoting and supporting entrepreneurship that complements well-established approaches. Namely, through its policies and actions, the government can create an environment in which experimentation and exploration is legitimate, thereby making it easier for entrepreneurs, new ventures and new organizational forms to access critical resources and realize their potential. -
SBCERS PE Q1 2018.Indd
Santa Barbara County Employees’ Retirement System First Quarter 2018 PE Performance Update Agenda • Q1 Private Equity Performance 1 • Deal Review 11 • Appendix 14 Q1 Private Equity Performance PE Portfolio Highlights - March 31, 2018 Performance and Value Creation • Portfolio outperforms the Russell 3000 + 300 bps (designated benchmark) for long-term periodss • 43 bps since inception; 1 bp for the 10-year period • 17.06% point-to-point IRR for the one-year period, with four quarters of positive performance • Net value gains of $37.0M over the year PE Portfolio Returns PE Portfolio Value Created 15% $20 12.51% 12.17% 12.35% 12.07% $14.4 $15 $13.5 10% $11.0 $10 $9.6 5.72% $8.5 $8.5 5.12% 5% 3.70% ($ in Millions) $5 $4.0 $4.0 1.60% 0% $0 6/30/2017 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 3/31/2018 6/30/2017 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 3/31/2018 Point to Point IRR Since Inception IRR Net Value Gain Market Value Growth Page 2 Portfolio Summary SBCERS PE Portfolio Since-Inception Summary $ in Million 12/31/2017 3/31/2018 Net Change Active Partnerships 64 66 2 • Two new investments added in the fi rst Active GP Relationships 30 30 - quarter to existing managers Committed Capital $537.5 $557.9 $20.4 • Portfolio is ~73% paid-in at 3/31/18 Unfunded Commitment $216.3 $227.7 $11.4 Paid-in Capital $395.3 $407.2 $11.9 • Slight increase to distributed-to-paid-in ratio Distributions $305.5 $317.3 $11.8 over the quarter, 78% since inception D/PI 77% 78% 1% Net Invested Capital $89.8 $89.9 $0.1 Market Value $249.5 $253.5 $4.0 Total Exposure $465.8 $481.2 $15.4 Average Age of Commitments -
Annual Review 2006 1 2006 Highlights
ANNUAL REVIEW 2006 CDC Group plc Our mission is to generate wealth, broadly shared, in emerging markets, particularly in poorer countries, by providing capital for investment in sustainable and responsibly managed private sector businesses. Contents Our target is to make at least 70% of 1 2006 Highlights 2 The Development Process 4 Chairman’s Statement our investments in the poorer countries* 6 Chief Executive’s Report 11 Business Principles and in the world and the remaining 30% in Development Impact 13 Business Review – Africa countries which are classified as poor**. 16 Business Review – Asia 20 Business Review – Latin America 21 Business Review – Power 23 Performance Review 28 Board of Directors We also target at least 50% of our 30 Senior Investment Team 32 CDC’s Fund Managers investments in sub-Saharan Africa IBC CDC’s Top Ten Underlying Investments and South Asia. *Countries where Gross National Income (GNI) per head is less than US$1,750. **Countries where GNI per head is less than US$9,075. CDC Group plc Annual Review 2006 1 2006 Highlights £2bn 23% £375m NET ASSETS INCREASE IN VALUE TOTAL RETURN AFTER TAX OF ASSETS 19 £413m NEW FUND MANAGERS NEW COMMITMENTS IN 2006 • Outperformed MSCI Emerging Markets Index by 14% • Profits recycled into new investments in poor countries • £132m of third party capital mobilised alongside CDC in Actis and Aureos funds • £914m outstanding commitments to 77 funds 2 CDC Group plc Annual Review 2006 The Development Process 1. CDC Capital CDC has assets of £2.0bn (US$3.9bn). Our purpose is to stimulate economic growth by investing successfully in the private sector. -
Sample Pages.Indd
The 2009 Preqin Infrastructure Review - Sample Pages The 2009 Preqin Infrastructure Review - Sample Pages © 2009 Preqin Ltd 1 The 2009 Preqin Infrastructure Review - Sample Pages Contents 1. Executive Summary 7 13. Listings of Infrastructure Fund Terms and Conditions 87 - Key terms and conditions for 27 infrastructure funds 2. Data Sources 13 14. Analysis of Infrastructure Fund Performance 91 3. Review of the Unlisted Infrastructure Market 17 - Targeted performance, net IRRs, net multiples, dry powder - Growth of the unlisted fund market, evolution of unlisted funds, fund geographic focus trends, project stage and asset focus trends, impact of PPP/PFIs, manager 15. Listings of Infrastructure Fund Performance 99 location and experience, emergence of fund of funds, predictions for the future of the asset class - Key performance metrics for 62 vehicles. All performance shown is net to investor 4. Review of Recent Infrastructure Fundraising: 2007-2009 25 16. Regional Focus: Key Facts and Figures 103 - Fundraising by geographic focus and manager location, breakdown of fundraising - Asia, Continental Europe, India, MENA, North America, South America, UK market by fund size, success in achieving targets, project stage focus, industry focus 17. Infrastructure Firm Preferences 115 - Matrix showing fi rm preferences by location, industry and project stage 5. Listings of Infrastructure Funds Closed Historically 31 18. Infrastructure Firm Profi les (Unlisted Primary Fund Managers) 127 6. Review of Current Infrastructure Fundraising Market 45 - Interim closes, fund focus, manager location, project stage focus, placement agent 19. Infrastructure Firm Profi les (Listed Fund Managers) 263 use, manager experience 20. Infrastructure Firm Profi les (Fund of Funds Managers) 293 7. -
The New Farm Owners Table
Corporate investors lead the rush for control over overseas farmland Investment Legal base Type Participating Details vehicle investors Abraaj Capital UAE Investment Abraaj Capital reported in 2008 that it had been buying farmland in Pakistan. The company also said it would invest in dairy firm farming in Pakistan from its US$250 million fund for Pakistan. Abraaj manages five equity funds and its parent group, Abraaj Capital Holdings Limited, has an issued share capital of US$ 1 billion and US$5bn of assets spread across the Middle East, North Africa and the South Asia AC Agri Germany Specialised - Aquila Capital Aquila Capital Group is an investment company with US$2.4 billion under management. Its AC Agri Opportunity Fund seeks to Opportunity fund (Germany) take over farm properties in Brazil, Australia and New Zealand. The fund is targeting an investment of up to US$400 million, Fund with a first capital raising of US$100 million. It is run by Detlef Schoen, an ex-CEO of Cargill Germany. The farm properties selected will be producers of dairy, beef cattle, sugar cane and row crops in stable least-cost locations, ensuring the minimisation of risk through both commodity and location diversity. This fund is composed of two sub-funds: the Oceania Dairy Fund (ODF) and the Brazil AgriFund (BAF), with rate of return targets of 12% and 25% respectively for a minimum of 5 years. Investments, set at a minimum of US$5m, will be generally allocated between the ODF and BAF at 30% and 70%, but investors will be able to select their own allocations depending on their individual needs. -
Trends in Private Equity and Venture Capital Investments with Special Focus on the Booming India Growth Story
Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol. 4, Issue 2 (2009) Trends in Private Equity and Venture Capital Investments with Special Focus on the Booming India Growth Story ∗ Ritankar Sahu Ananya Nath & Priyadarshi Banerjee National Law University Jodhpur (India) Abstract. Private Equity investments have restructured the trend of acquisitions and aided in value creation as against strategic buyers. Private equity’s growing involvement in many sectors is even more striking. The nature of investments of private equity firms and funds, the strategies employed, value creating practices, profitable exits are significantly different from that of other strategic and corporate buyers. The paper deals with the above aspects. The paper is divided into two parts. Part I deals with the basics of private equity investment structures and exits. Part II of the paper deals with the private equity growth story in India. Private equity investments, proposed changes to regulations, sectoral growth, venture capital regulations as well as impact of the latest Union budget a the credit crunch have been dealt with. 1. Basics of Private Equity Investments – structures, funds and exits 1.1 Introduction Private Equity is the provision of equity capital by financial investors – over the medium or long term – to non- quoted companies with high growth potential.1 Venture capital is, strictly speaking, a subset of private equity and refers to equity investments made for the launch, earl development, or expansion of a business. Private equity covers not only the financing required to create a business, but also includes financing in the subsequent development stages of its life-cycle. -
Private Equity in Brazil
JUNE 2019 Private Equity in Brazil 1 The Brazilian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association is a non-profit organization that promotes the development of private equity, venture capital and seed capital in Brazil, by improving industry conditions and understandings, while also fomenting good practices that are aligned with international industry standards. The Brazilian Trade and Investment Promotion Agency (Apex-Brasil) works to promote Brazilian products and services abroad, and to attract foreign investment to strategic sectors in Brazil. The Agency carries out several trade promotion initiatives, such as commercial and prospective missions, business rounds, support to the participation of Brazilian companies in major business fairs, and visits of foreign buyers and opinion formers to assess the country’s productive structure. Apex-Brasil also plays a key role in attracting foreign direct investment to Brazil, working to detect business opportunities, promoting strategic events and providing support to foreign investors interested in allocating resources in the country. The InBrazil Private Equity & Venture Capital Program is a joint initiative between ABVCAP and Apex-Brasil, set up to keep international investors well informed, linking them up with Brazilian fund managers and portfolio companies. The main goal of the program is to inform and empower the global investor community about the PE-VC ecosystem in Brazil, spotlighting its many opportunities. 2 Industry Overview This report offers a general overview of the private equity indus- try in Brazil. Through data, analyses and interviews with some of Brazil’s leading players, this publication outlines the main trends for this sector, together with the outlook for the next few years.