DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Structures and Support Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Structures and Support Systems SICSA SPACE ARCHITECTURE SEMINAR LECTURE SERIES PART I: SPACE STRUCTURES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS www.sicsa.uh.edu LARRY BELL, SASAKAWA INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SPACE ARCHITECTURE (SICSA) GERALD D.HINES COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TX The Sasakawa International Center for SICSA routinely presents its publications, Space Architecture (SICSA), an research and design results and other organization attached to the University of information materials on its website Houston’s Gerald D. Hines College of (www.sicsa.uh.edu). This is done as a free Architecture, offers advanced courses service to other interested institutions and that address a broad range of space individuals throughout the world who share our systems research and design topics. In interests. 2003 SICSA and the college initiated Earth’s first MS-Space Architecture This report is offered in a PowerPoint format with degree program, an interdisciplinary 30 the dedicated intent to be useful for academic, credit hour curriculum that is open to corporate and professional organizations who participants from many fields. Some wish to present it in group forums. The document students attend part-time while holding is the first in a series of seminar lectures that professional employment positions at SICSA has prepared as information material for NASA, affiliated aerospace corporations its own academic applications. We hope that and other companies, while others these materials will also be valuable for others complete their coursework more rapidly who share our goals to advance space on a full-time basis. exploration and development. SPACE STRUCTURES AND PREFACE SUPPORT SYSTEMS The SICSA Space Architecture Seminar Lecture Series is divided into two general Lecture Groups : GROUP ONE: GROUP TWO: Part I : Space Structures and Part V : The History of Support Systems Space Architecture Part II : Human Adaptation and Part VI : The Nature of Space Safety in Space Environments Part III : Space Transportation, Part VII : Environmental Planning Propulsion and Pathways and Systems Part IV : Space Mission and Part VIII : Shelter Design and Facility Architectures Construction The SICSA Seminar Lecture Series SPACE STRUCTURES AND PREFACE SUPPORT SYSTEMS This lecture series provides comprehensive information, considerations and examples to support SPACE STRUCTURES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS planning of human space missions and facilities: HUMAN ADAPTATION & SAFETY IN SPACE IN SAFETY & HUMAN ADAPTATION Part I (this report) presents a general anatomy of CONSTRUCTION space habitats and vehicles as a foundation for & ELEMENTS understanding relationships to topics discussed in other three parts: PART I - Module types, elements and construction HABITATS & FEATURES influence Human Adaptation and Safety (Part II) PART II by determining habitat options and features (including life support and other systems). PART IV - Habitat structures must be designed to comply TYPES & PART III PART with launch and transfer capacities of Space REQUIREMENTS Transportation, Propulsion and Pathways (Part III) with regard to allowable payload mass and VOLUME & volume. MASS ALLOWABLE - Selection and planning of all space structures and SPACE MISSION & FACILITY ARCHITECTURES & FACILITY MISSION SPACE support systems must be responsive to Space PATHWAYS SION & & SION Mission and Facility Architectures (Part IV) that PROPUL TRANSPORTATION, SPACE are determined by program goals and objectives. Key Relationships to Other Lectures SICSA SEMINAR SERIES PART I EMPHASES We are very grateful to Dr. James F. “Jim” Peters who has generously made a large body of material he has developed and collected available to us. This report draws extensively from his work. Much additional material can be obtained from his book, “Spacecraft Systems Design and Operations”, which can be obtained from the Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, 4050 Westmark Drive, Dubuque, Iowa 52202. This excellent publication is used as a primary text for the SICSA MS-Space Architecture curriculum, and is highly recommended as a valuable reference document for students and professionals at all career stages. Key Reference Book SPACE STRUCTURES AND SPECIAL CREDITS SUPPORT SYSTEMS “Human Space Flight: Mission Analysis and Design” is a comprehensive and substantial book that should be in the library of any organization and individual involved in space project management, research, design or operations. The document was edited by Wiley J. Larson of the US Air Force Academy and Linda K. Pranke of LK Editorial Services as part of a Space Technology Series through a cooperative activity of NASA and the US Department of Justice. Text materials were contributed by 67 professional engineers, managers and educators from industry, government and academia. It is available through the Higher Education Division of McGraw- Hill. Important Resource Book SPACE STRUCTURES AND SPECIAL CREDITS SUPPORT SYSTEMS It would be difficult or impossible to find anyone more knowledgeable about the subject of his book, “Space Stations and Platforms”, than Gordon Woodcock from Boeing. “Gordy” has enormously broad experience and expertise, and we are all fortunate he has made the effort to share it. As noted by Edward Gibson in the book’s forward, “Over the coming years, this work should become a classic space station reference. It has high value for those who desire to understand, appreciate or contribute to our first permanent settlement in New Earth”. It can be obtained through the publisher: Orbit Book Company, Inc., 2005 Township Road, Malabar, Florida 32950. Important Resource Book SPACE STRUCTURES AND SPECIAL CREDITS SUPPORT SYSTEMS Section A : Background - Vibration Sources and Problems………………....B-4 Adapting to Environments - Pressurized Habitat forms…………………....……B-5 - Thermal Loads and Interventions………………...B-6 - Shelter Precedents……………………………... A-2 - The Natural Radiation Environment……………...B-7 - Special and Extreme Environments…………...A-3 - Radiation Effects on Crew and Equipment………B-8 - Space Habitat Applications……………………..A-4 - Radiation Protection………………………………..B-9 Astrotectonics - Lunar Soil as a Radiation Barrier………….…...…B-10 - Key Planning Considerations………………..… A-5 - SICSA’s Project LEAP Concept…………………..B-11 - Application Considerations…………………….. A-6 - Space Debris Hazards………………….………….B-12 - Transportation Considerations………………… A-7 - Space Debris Protection………………………...…B-13 - Deployment Considerations………………...…. A-8 - Material Degradation / Atomic Oxygen…........…..B-14 - Operational Considerations……………………. A-9 - Reducing Atomic Oxygen Effects………………...B-15 - Structural Loads……………...………….....……A-10 Construction Possibilities - Requirement Influences……………...……….…A-11 - Habitat Module Types………………...……………B-16 - Summary Considerations……………………….A-12 References and Other Sources………………...A-13 Conventional Modules - Conventional Module Examples…………………..B-17 Section B : Space Structures & Applications - Types of Pressure Structures……………………..B-18 General Design Considerations - Primary Habitat Module Structures……………….B-19 - Operational and Environmental Issues….….…B-2 - Secondary Habitat Module Structures……………B-20 - Launch, Docking and Reentry Loads….…..…. B-3 SPACE STRUCTURES AND CONTENTS SUPPORT SYSTEMS - Airlocks……………………………………………. B-21 - NASA-JSC / ILC Lunar Habitat Construction....…B-39 Telescoping Modules - NASA-JSC TransHab Concept.............................B-41 - SICSA Concept for Mars Surface…………..…. B-22 - NASA-JSC / ILC Dover TransHab Prototype….…B-42 - SICSA Concept (LaBS facility)……....…….……B-23 - Bigelow Commercial Venture……………………..B-43 - Bigelow Module Development…………………….B-44 Inflatable Modules - Bigelow Module Testing………...……….....…..... B-45 - NASA Lunar Base Concept……………………..B-24 - SICSA “Pop-Out” Interior Concept…………….....B-46 - Russian Airlock Demonstration…...……...….… B-25 - Early GAC Developments (Toroidal Structure). B-26 Hybrid Modules - Early GAC Developments (Lunar Shelter)……. B-27 - SICSA SpaceHab Concept…………………...….. B-51 - Early GAC Developments (“Moby Dick” ).....…..B-28 - SICSA LunarHab Concept…………………..........B-55 - Early GAC Developments (Spacelab Tunnel)...B-29 - SICSA MarsLAb Concept……………...….........…B-57 - Early GAC Developments (Airlock)….........……B-30 - SICSA Lunar/ Mars Hab…………...………......….B-59 - GAC Folding Techniques…………….....….....…B-31 Module Combinations - GAC Pressure Wall Construction……....………B-32 - SICSA’s Project LEAP……...…………..….………B-61 - Foam Rigidized Structures…….......…...…..…..B-34 - SICSA’s First Mars Outpost…...……...……….….B-62 - Early Inflatable Development…………………... B-35 - SICSA’s Lunar/ Mars Modules……………….……B-63 - Lawrence Livermore Studies……………....……B-36 Outside Viewing - NASA-JSC / ILC Lunar Habitat……...…….....…B-38 - Window Importance………………………………..B-66 SPACE STRUCTURES AND CONTENTS SUPPORT SYSTEMS - Window Types and Location………...…..…. B-67 - Configuration Concepts ………...….………….….…B-88 - Special Viewing Devices………………….… B-69 - System Types - Common Truss Geometries….…. B-92 - Attached Cupola Concepts……………….... B-70 - System Types - Tetrahedral Trusses………………B-93 - Window Planning and Design……………… B-71 - System Types - Deployable Truss Structure……...B-94 - Illustrative Construction Concepts…………. B-72 - System Types - ACCESS Construction Operation B-95 - Skylab Windows……………………………... B-73 - System Types - Telerobotic Assembly …………….B-96 - Skylab Wardroom Window………………….. B-74 - System Types - ERA Unfurlable Structure…………B-97 - ESA Spacelab Window Adapter Assembly.. B-75 - System Types – Automated Beam
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Posture in Space
    Russia’s Posture in Space: Prospects for Europe Executive Summary Prepared by the European Space Policy Institute Marco ALIBERTI Ksenia LISITSYNA May 2018 Table of Contents Background and Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 1 Domestic Developments in Russia’s Space Programme ............................................................ 2 Russia’s International Space Posture ......................................................................................... 4 Prospects for Europe .................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Research Objectives For the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik-1, in 2007, the rebirth of Russian space activities appeared well on its way. After the decade-long crisis of the 1990s, the country’s political leadership guided by President Putin gave new impetus to the development of national space activities and put the sector back among the top priorities of Moscow’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Supported by the progressive recovery of Russia’s economy, renewed political stability, and an improving external environment, Russia re-asserted strong ambitions and the resolve to regain its original position on the international scene. Towards this, several major space programmes were adopted, including the Federal Space Programme 2006-2015, the Federal Target Programme on the development of Russian cosmodromes, and the Federal Target Programme on the redeployment of GLONASS. This renewed commitment to the development of space activities was duly reflected in a sharp increase in the country’s launch rate and space budget throughout the decade. Thanks to the funds made available by flourishing energy exports, Russia’s space expenditure continued to grow even in the midst of the global financial crisis. Besides new programmes and increased funding, the spectrum of activities was also widened to encompass a new focus on space applications and commercial products.
    [Show full text]
  • ESA Missions AO Analysis
    ESA Announcements of Opportunity Outcome Analysis Arvind Parmar Head, Science Support Office ESA Directorate of Science With thanks to Kate Isaak, Erik Kuulkers, Göran Pilbratt and Norbert Schartel (Project Scientists) ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use The ESA Fleet for Astrophysics ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Dual-Anonymous Proposal Reviews | STScI | 25/09/2019 | Slide 2 ESA Announcement of Observing Opportunities Ø Observing time AOs are normally only used for ESA’s observatory missions – the targets/observing strategies for the other missions are generally the responsibility of the Science Teams. Ø ESA does not provide funding to successful proposers. Ø Results for ESA-led missions with recent AOs presented: • XMM-Newton • INTEGRAL • Herschel Ø Gender information was not requested in the AOs. It has been ”manually” derived by the project scientists and SOC staff. ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Dual-Anonymous Proposal Reviews | STScI | 25/09/2019 | Slide 3 XMM-Newton – ESA’s Large X-ray Observatory ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Dual-Anonymous Proposal Reviews | STScI | 25/09/2019 | Slide 4 XMM-Newton Ø ESA’s second X-ray observatory. Launched in 1999 with annual calls for observing proposals. Operational. Ø Typically 500 proposals per XMM-Newton Call with an over-subscription in observing time of 5-7. Total of 9233 proposals. Ø The TAC typically consists of 70 scientists divided into 13 panels with an overall TAC chair. Ø Output is >6000 refereed papers in total, >300 per year ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
    [Show full text]
  • The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight After ISS
    67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Guadalajara, Mexico, 26-30 September 2016. Copyright ©2016 by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). All rights reserved. IAC-16, B3,1,9,x32622 The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight after ISS O. Romberga, D. Quantiusa, C. Philpota, S. Jahnkea, W. Seboldta, H. Dittusb, S. Baerwaldeb, H. Schlegelc, M. Goldd, G. Zamkad, R. da Costae, I. Retate, R. Wohlgemuthe, M. Langee a German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Space Systems, Bremen, Germany, [email protected] b German Aerospace Center (DLR), Executive Board, Space Research and Technology, Cologne, Germany, c European Space Agency (ESA) Contractor, Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA, d Bigelow Aerospace, Las Vegas / Washington, USA, e Airbus DS, Bremen, Germany Abstract The International Space Station ISS demonstrates long-term international cooperation between many partner governments as well as significant engineering and programmatic achievement mostly as a compromise of budget, politics, administration and technological feasibility. A paradigm shift to use the ISS more as an Earth observation platform and to more innovation and risk acceptance can be observed in the development of new markets by shifting responsibilities to private entities and broadening research disciplines, demanding faster access by users and including new launcher and experiment facilitator companies. A review of worldwide activities shows that all spacefaring nations are developing their individual programmes for the time after ISS. All partners are basically still interested in LEO and human spaceflight as discussed by the ISECG. ISS follow-on activities should comprise clear scientific and technological objectives combined with the long term view on space exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha"
    1995 (32nd) People and Technology - The Case The Space Congress® Proceedings For Space Apr 26th, 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha" Anatoli I. Kiselev General Director Khrunichev, SRPSC Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Kiselev, Anatoli I., "Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha"" (1995). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 28. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1995-32nd/april-26-1995/28 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENERGY BLOCK OF INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION "ALPHA" Ana10Ji I.Kisclev - General Director K.hrunichcv SRPSC Anatoli i.Nedaivoda - General Designer Valdimir K.Karra.sk - Professor, Design Center Director The international space station "Alpha" consists of the American, Rus­ sian, European and Japanese segments. Its integration in the orbit will take place in November, 1997 starting from the injection of 20-tonn erergy block on the basis of the unified functional c.argo blade (russian abbr1.. "' iation as EFGB) by means of the "Proton" LY. The EFG B is designed by the KHRUNICHEV State Research and Production Space Center (KSRPSC) The orbit hight with the inclination of 51.6 deg for EFGB is so selected thett by the end of December, 1997 it can be decreased upto the hight (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-134 Press
    CONTENTS Section Page STS-134 MISSION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................ 1 STS-134 TIMELINE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 9 MISSION PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 11 MISSION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 13 MISSION PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................. 15 STS-134 ENDEAVOUR CREW .................................................................................................. 17 PAYLOAD OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 25 ALPHA MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER-2 .................................................................................................. 25 EXPRESS LOGISTICS CARRIER 3 ......................................................................................................... 31 RENDEZVOUS & DOCKING ....................................................................................................... 43 UNDOCKING, SEPARATION AND DEPARTURE ....................................................................................... 44 SPACEWALKS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Arm.Indd
    Ages: 8-12 Topic: Engineering design and teamwork Standards: This activity is aligned to national standards in science, technology, health and mathematics. Mission X: Train Like an Astronaut Next Generation: 3-5-ETS1-2. Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely A Robotic Arm to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be EDUCATOR SECTION (PAGES 1-7) improved. STUDENT SECTION (PAGES 8-15) Background Why do we need robotic arms when working in space? As an example, try holding a book in your hands straight out in front of you and not moving them for one or two minutes. After a while, do your hands start to shake or move around? Imagine how hard it would be to hold your hands steady for many days in a row, or to lift something really heavy. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a really long arm that never gets tired? Well, to help out in space, scientists have designed and used robotic arms for years. On Earth, scientists have designed robotic arms for everything from moving heavy equipment to performing delicate surgery. Robotic arms are important machines that help people work on Earth as well as in space. Astronaut attached to a robotic arm on the ISS. Look at your arms once again. Your arms are covered in skin for protection.
    [Show full text]
  • We Need Your Colouring Skills!
    We need your colouring skills! What do you think the colours of Mercury are? DID YOU KNOW? ercury • Mercury is the smallest planet in our solar system. • It is only slightly larger than the Earth’s Moon. • One day on Mercury is as long as 59 days on Earth. • A year on Mercury is as long as 88 Earth days • Temperatures on Mercury are extreme, reaching 430°C during the day, and -180°C at night. DID YOU KNOW? The Erth Depending on where you are on the globe, you could be spinning through space at just over 1,000 miles per hour. Water covers 70 percent of Earth's surface. 1 million Earths could fit in the Sun. Earth's atmosphere is composed of about 78 percent nitrogen, 21 percent oxygen, 0.9 percent argon, and 0.1 percent other gases. Earth is the only planet not named after a god. We need your colouring skills! What colours will you choose? We need your colouring skills! What do you think the colours of Jupiter are? DID YOU KNOW? Jupiter • Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system. • Jupiter is as large as 1,300 Earths. • It's the 3rd brightest object in the night sky. • There's a big red spot on Jupiter, which is in fact a storm that has been raging for more than 350 years. DID YOU KNOW? Saturn • Saturn is the 2nd largest planet in the Solar System. • 764 Earths could fit inside Saturn. • Saturn's rings are made of ice and rock. They span 175,000 miles We need your and yet they’re only 20 metres thick.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Race Continues
    The Space Race Continues The Evolution of Space Tourism from Novelty to Opportunity Matthew D. Melville, Vice President Shira Amrany, Consulting and Valuation Analyst HVS GLOBAL HOSPITALITY SERVICES 369 Willis Avenue Mineola, NY 11501 USA Tel: +1 516 248-8828 Fax: +1 516 742-3059 June 2009 NORTH AMERICA - Atlanta | Boston | Boulder | Chicago | Dallas | Denver | Mexico City | Miami | New York | Newport, RI | San Francisco | Toronto | Vancouver | Washington, D.C. | EUROPE - Athens | London | Madrid | Moscow | ASIA - 1 Beijing | Hong Kong | Mumbai | New Delhi | Shanghai | Singapore | SOUTH AMERICA - Buenos Aires | São Paulo | MIDDLE EAST - Dubai HVS Global Hospitality Services The Space Race Continues At a space business forum in June 2008, Dr. George C. Nield, Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), addressed the future of commercial space travel: “There is tangible work underway by a number of companies aiming for space, partly because of their dreams, but primarily because they are confident it can be done by the private sector and it can be done at a profit.” Indeed, private companies and entrepreneurs are currently aiming to make this dream a reality. While the current economic downturn will likely slow industry progress, space tourism, currently in its infancy, is poised to become a significant part of the hospitality industry. Unlike the space race of the 1950s and 1960s between the United States and the former Soviet Union, the current rivalry is not defined on a national level, but by a collection of first-mover entrepreneurs that are working to define the industry and position it for long- term profitability.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitation Module 26 July 2016 – NASA Advisory Council, Human Exploration and Operations Committee
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Habitation Module 26 July 2016 – NASA Advisory Council, Human Exploration and Operations Committee Jason Crusan | Advanced Exploration Systems Director | NASA Headquarters 2 Human Exploration of Mars Is Hard Common Capability Needs Identified from Multiple Studies Days Reliable In-Space 800-1,100 44 min Transportation Total me crew is Maximum two- away from Earth – way communicaon for orbit missions all in 2me delay – 300 KW Micro-g and Radia2on Autonomous Opera2ons Total connuous transportaon power 130 t Heavy-LiA Mass 20-30 t Long Surface Stay Multiple Ability to 500 Days Launches per land large mission payloads Surface Operations Dust Toxicity and 100 km 11.2 km/s Long Range Explora2on Earth Entry Speed 20 t Oxygen produced for ascent to orbit - ISRU 3 The Habitation Development Challenge HABITATATION CAPABILITY Days 800-1,100 Habitation Systems – Total me crew is AES/ISS/STMD away from Earth – • Environmental Control & Life Support for orbit missions all in • Autonomous Systems Micro-g and Radia2on Integrated • EVA testing on ISS • Fire Safety • Radiation Protection Habitation Systems - Crew Health – HRP Long Surface Stay • Human Research 500 Days • Human Performance • Exercise PROVING GROUND Validation in cislunar space • Nutrition Habitation Capability– NextSTEP BAA / Int. Partners • Studies and ground prototypes of pressurized volumes 4 Specific Habitation Systems Objectives TODAY FUTURE Habitation The systems, tools, and protec:ons that allow Systems Elements humans to live and work
    [Show full text]
  • I a COMPARISON STUDY on CONTROL MOMENT GYROSCOPE ARRAYS and STEERING LAWS CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY a THESIS SUBMITTED to the F
    A COMPARISON STUDY ON CONTROL MOMENT GYROSCOPE ARRAYS AND STEERING LAWS CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO DECEMBER 2019 ©CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY, 2019 i Abstract Current reaction wheels and magnetorquers for microsatellite are limited by low slew rate and heavily depends on orbital parameters for coverage area. Control moment gyroscope (CMG) clusters offer an alternative solution for high slew rates and rapid retargeting. Though CMGs are often used in large space missions, their use in microsatellites is limited due to the stringent mass budget. Most literature reports only on pyramid configuration, and there are no definite cross comparison studies between various CMG clusters and steering laws. In this research, a generic tool in Matlab and Simulink is developed to further understand CMG configurations and steering laws for a microsat mission. Various steering laws necessary for mitigating singularities in CMG clusters are compared in two distinct missions. The simulation results were evaluated based on the pointing accuracy, platform jitter, and pointing stability achieved by the spacecraft for each combination of CMG clusters, steering laws and trajectories. The simulation results demonstrate that the pyramid cluster is marginally better than the rooftop cluster in pointing accuracy. The comparison of steering laws shows that, counterintuitively, Singularity Robust steering law, which passes through singularities, outperforms both Moore-Penrose and Local Gradient methods for almost all evaluation criteria for the two missions it was tested on.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationale Raumstation ISS International Space Station ISS
    Internationale Raumstation ISS International Space Station ISS www.DLR.de Europäisches Labormodul COLUMBUS European laboratory module COLUMBUS US-Labormodul DESTINY japanisches Labormodul KIBO US laboratory module DESTINY Japanese laboratory module KIBO Russisches Cargo-Modul SaRja (Functional Cargo Block) Russian cargo module ZARYA 20. November 1998: (Functional Cargo Block) 24. Februar 2011: Start des ersten ISS-Moduls: Start des permanenten der Functional Cargo Block Logistikmoduls PMM (FGB) Sarja Leonardo November 20, 1998: February 24, 2011: launch of the first ISS module: launch of the logistic the Functional Cargo Block module PMM Leonardo (FGB) Zarya 12. juli 2000: 8. Februar 2010: Start des Service- und Wohn- Start des Aussichtsmoduls moduls Swesda Cupola July 12, 2000: February 8, 2011: launch of the observatory launch of the service and Russisches Service-Modul habitation module Zvezda module Cupola SwESDa Russian service module 10. November 2009: 7. Februar 2001: Europäisches Logistikmodul aTV-2 Start des amerikanischen ZvEZDA Start des russischen Docking- Labormoduls DESTINY (automated Transfer Vehicle) moduls POISK Mini-Research „johannes Kepler“ Module 2 February 7, 2001: 7. Februar 2008: 31. Mai 2008: launch of the American European logistics module ATv-2 November 10, 2009: Start des europäischen Start des zweiten Teils des laboratory module DESTINY (Automated Transfer vehicle) launch of the Russian docking Labormoduls japanischen Labormoduls “Johannes Kepler” module POISK Mini-Research COLUMBUS KIBO Pressurized Module (PM) Module 2 February 7, 2008: May 31, 2008: launch of the European launch of the second part of the research module Japanese laboratory module KIBO COLUMBUS Pressurized Module (PM) ISS ISS © NASA, ESA, DLR Forschung im All für die Menschen auf der Erde Research in Space for Mankind on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployable Modular Frame for Inflatable Space Habitats
    70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Washington D.C., United States, 21-25 October 2019. Copyright ©2019 by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). All rights reserved. IAC-19,B3,8-GTS.2,4,x48931 DMF: Deployable Modular Frame for Inflatable Space Habitats Vittorio Netti1, * 1University of Houston, [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract Inflatable Space Modules for space exploration are now a reality. In 2016, Bigelow Aerospace tested the first inflatable module Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) on the International Space Station (ISS), achieving success. This technology has higher volume limits than other launchers, substantially changing the previous concepts of construction and life in space. Nevertheless, inflatable modules technology lacks a reliable and functional platform to efficiently use all this space. Due to its limited dimension, the International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR), currently used on ISS, is not suitable for this purpose. The project aims at developing a new standard for payload rack in the inflatable space modules: the Deployable Modular Frame (DMF). The DMF expands itself radially from the center of the module, starting from four structural pylons. It creates a solid infrastructure allowing for the configuration of a variety of spaces, including storage space, laboratories, workstations and living quarters. The DMF consists of two main parts: the Deployable Frame (DF) and the Modular Rack (MR). Once the frame is deployed, it provides four linear slots suitable to install the modular racks. The rack is the basic element that allows for the storage of equipment inside the frame. Once they are installed, the racks can slide on the frame’s rails, dynamically changing the space inside the module.
    [Show full text]