DOCSLIB.ORG

Kibo HANDBOOK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kibo HANDBOOK Kibo HANDBOOK September 2007 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Human Space Systems and Utilization Program Group Kibo HANDBOOK Contents 1. Background on Development of Kibo ............................................1-1 1.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 International Space Station (ISS) Program ........................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Outline.........................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Background of Kibo Development...................................................................................... 1-4 2. Kibo Elements...................................................................................2-1 2.1 Kibo Elements.................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.1 Pressurized Module (PM)............................................................................................ 2-3 2.1.2 Experiment Logistics Module - Pressurized Section (ELM-PS)................................... 2-4 2.1.3 Exposed Facility (EF) .................................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.4 Experiment Logistics Module - Exposed Section (ELM-ES)........................................ 2-6 2.1.5 JEM Remote Manipulator System (JEMRMS)............................................................. 2-7 2.1.6 Inter-orbit Communication System (ICS)..................................................................... 2-8 3. Kibo Specifications ..........................................................................3-1 3.1 Specifications of Kibo Components.................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Kibo Operation Mode ......................................................................................................... 3-4 4. Kibo System Components ...............................................................4-1 4.1 Pressurized Module (PM) .................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.1 Brief Summary............................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 Layout ......................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.1.3 System Components of PM......................................................................................... 4-6 4.2 Experiment Logistics Module- Pressurized Section (ELM-PS) ........................................ 4-12 4.2.1 Brief Summary........................................................................................................... 4-12 4.2.2 Layout ....................................................................................................................... 4-13 4.2.3 System Components of ELM-PS............................................................................... 4-14 4.3 Exposed Facility............................................................................................................... 4-17 4.3.1 Brief Summary........................................................................................................... 4-17 4.3.2 Layout ....................................................................................................................... 4-19 4.3.3 System Components of EF........................................................................................ 4-21 4.4 Experiment Logistic Module-Exposed Section (ELM-ES) ................................................ 4-24 4.4.1 Brief summary ........................................................................................................... 4-24 4.4.2 Layout ....................................................................................................................... 4-26 i Kibo HANDBOOK 4.4.3 System Components of ELM-ES............................................................................... 4-27 4.5 Japanese Experiment Module Remote Manipulator System (JEMRMS) ......................... 4-29 4.5.1 Brief Summary........................................................................................................... 4-29 4.5.2 Layout ....................................................................................................................... 4-31 4.5.3 System Components of JEMRMS ............................................................................. 4-32 4.6 Inter orbit Communication System (ICS).......................................................................... 4-34 4.6.1 Brief Summary........................................................................................................... 4-34 4.6.2 Layout ....................................................................................................................... 4-35 4.6.3 System Components of ICS ...................................................................................... 4-36 5. Kibo Operations................................................................................5-1 5.1 Launch and Flight Plan ...................................................................................................... 5-2 5.2 Kibo Assembly Sequence .................................................................................................. 5-3 5.2.1 1J/A Flight.................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.2 1J Flight.......................................................................................................................5-6 5.2.3 2J/A Flight.................................................................................................................. 5-10 5.3 Kibo Operations Control................................................................................................... 5-13 5.3.1 Orbital Interface (between the ground to/from Kibo).................................................. 5-17 5.3.2 Ground Interface (between TKSC and NASA Mission Control Centers) ................... 5-18 6. Kibo Utilization .................................................................................6-1 6.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.2 Environment....................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.1 Microgravity................................................................................................................. 6-2 6.2.2 Line of Sight and field of view from the ISS................................................................. 6-2 6.2.3 Background Atmosphere ............................................................................................. 6-3 6.2.4 Space Radiation .......................................................................................................... 6-4 6.2.5 Thermal Environment .................................................................................................. 6-4 6.2.6 Micrometeoroid and Space Debris .............................................................................. 6-4 6.3 Experiment Payloads ......................................................................................................... 6-5 6.3.1 Experiment Payloads for Kibo’s Pressurized Module (PM) ......................................... 6-5 6.3.2 Exposed Facility (EF) Experiment Payloads.............................................................. 6-15 6.4 Utilization Plan ................................................................................................................. 6-21 6.4.1 Overall Schedule ....................................................................................................... 6-21 6.4.2 Utilization Fields ........................................................................................................ 6-22 6.4.3 Experiment Themes .................................................................................................. 6-23 ii Kibo HANDBOOK 6.4.4 Utilization Plan........................................................................................................... 6-27 7. H-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV) Overview..............................................7-1 7.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 7-2 7.1.1 HTV Components........................................................................................................ 7-3 7.2 HTV Operations ................................................................................................................. 7-7 7.2.1 Launch ........................................................................................................................ 7-8 7.2.2 Rendezvous ................................................................................................................ 7-9 7.2.3 Berthing with the ISS (Proximity Operation Phase) ................................................... 7-10 7.2.4 Operations while berthed to the ISS.......................................................................... 7-12 7.2.5 Departure from the ISS and Reentry ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IVS NICT-TDC News No.39
    ISSN 1882-3432 CONTENTS Proceedings of the 18th NICT TDC Symposium (Kashima, October 1, 2020) KNIFE, Kashima Nobeyama InterFErometer . 3 Makoto Miyoshi Space-Time Measurements Research Inspired by Kashima VLBI Group . 8 Mizuhiko Hosokawa ALMA High Frequency Long Baseline Phase Correction Using Band-to-band ..... 11 (B2B) Phase Referencing Yoshiharu Asaki and Luke T. Maud Development of a 6.5-22.5 GHz Very Wide Band Feed Antenna Using a New ..... 15 Quadruple-Ridged Antenna for the Traditional Radio Telescopes Yutaka Hasegawa*, Yasumasa Yamasaki, Hideo Ogawa, Taiki Kawakami, Yoshi- nori Yonekura, Kimihiro Kimura, Takuya Akahori, Masayuki Ishino, Yuki Kawa- hara Development of Wideband Antenna . 18 Hideki Ujihara Performance Survey of Superconductor Filter Introduced in Wideband Re- ..... 20 ceiver for VGOS of the Ishioka VLBI Station Tomokazu Nakakuki, Haruka Ueshiba, Saho Matsumoto, Yu Takagi, Kyonosuke Hayashi, Toru Yutsudo, Katsuhiro Mori, Tomokazu Kobayashi, and Mamoru Sekido New Calibration Method for a Radiometer Without Using Liquid Nitrogen ..... 23 Cooled Absorber Noriyuki Kawaguchi, Yuichi Chikahiro, Kenichi Harada, and Kensuke Ozeki Comparison of Atmospheric Delay Models (NMF, VMF1, and VMF3) in ..... 27 VLBI analysis Mamoru Sekido and Monia Negusini HINOTORI Status Report . 31 Hiroshi Imai On-the-Fly Interferometer Experiment with the Yamaguchi Interferometer . 34 Kenta Fujisawa, Kotaro Niinuma, Masanori Akimoto, and Hideyuki Kobayashi Superconducting Wide-band BRF for Geodetic VLBI Observation with ..... 36 VGOS Radio Telescope
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Phase Resolved Spectroscopy of 4U1538-52 with MAXI
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. jjrr-mif-maxi_rev5 c ESO 2018 September 12, 2018 Orbital phase resolved spectroscopy of 4U1538−52 with MAXI J. J. Rodes-Roca1, 2, 3,,⋆ T. Mihara3, S. Nakahira4, J. M. Torrejón1, 2, Á. Giménez-García1, 2, 5, and G. Bernabéu1, 2 1 Dept. of Physics, Systems Engineering and Sign Theory, University of Alicante, 03080 Ali- cante, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 University Institute of Physics Applied to Sciences and Technologies, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain 3 MAXI team, Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan e-mail: [email protected] 4 ISS Science Project Office, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), 2-1-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8505, Japan 5 School of Physics, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia XX-XX-XX; XX-XX-XX ABSTRACT Context. 4U 1538−52, an absorbed high mass X-ray binary with an orbital period of ∼3.73 days, shows moderate orbital intensity modulations with a low level of counts during the eclipse. Sev- eral models have been proposed to explain the accretion at different orbital phases by a spherically arXiv:1507.04274v2 [astro-ph.HE] 18 Jul 2015 symmetric stellar wind from the companion. Aims. The aim of this work is to study both the light curve and orbital phase spectroscopy of this source in the long term. Particularly, the folded light curve and the changes of the spectral parameters with orbital phase to analyse the stellar wind of QV Nor, the mass donor of this binary system.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing the Limits of the Coronagraphic Occulters on Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph
    Pushing the limits of the coronagraphic occulters on Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph John H. Debes Bin Ren Glenn Schneider John H. Debes, Bin Ren, Glenn Schneider, “Pushing the limits of the coronagraphic occulters on Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph,” J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 5(3), 035003 (2019), doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.5.3.035003. Downloaded From: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Astronomical-Telescopes,-Instruments,-and-Systems on 02 Jul 2019 Terms of Use: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/terms-of-use Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 5(3), 035003 (Jul–Sep 2019) Pushing the limits of the coronagraphic occulters on Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph John H. Debes,a,* Bin Ren,b,c and Glenn Schneiderd aSpace Telescope Science Institute, AURA for ESA, Baltimore, Maryland, United States bJohns Hopkins University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States cJohns Hopkins University, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Baltimore, Maryland, United States dUniversity of Arizona, Steward Observatory and the Department of Astronomy, Tucson Arizona, United States Abstract. The Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) contains the only currently operating coronagraph in space that is not trained on the Sun. In an era of extreme-adaptive- optics-fed coronagraphs, and with the possibility of future space-based coronagraphs, we re-evaluate the con- trast performance of the STIS CCD camera. The 50CORON aperture consists of a series of occulting wedges and bars, including the recently commissioned BAR5 occulter. We discuss the latest procedures in obtaining high-contrast imaging of circumstellar disks and faint point sources with STIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Noise Strategy Roadmap
    Ocean Noise Strategy Roadmap Ocean Noise Strategy Roadmap Jason Gedamke, Jolie Harrison, Leila Hatch, Robyn Angliss, Jay Barlow, Catherine Berchok, Chris Caldow, Manuel Castellote, Danielle Cholewiak, Monica L. DeAngelis, Robert Dziak, Ellen Garland, Shane Guan, Sean Hastings, Marla Holt, Ben Laws, David Mellinger, Sue Moore, Thomas J. Moore, Erin Oleson, Jacqueline Pearson-Meyer, Wendy Piniak, Jessica Redfern, Teri Rowles, Amy Scholik-Schlomer, Aileen Smith, Melissa Soldevilla, John Stadler, Sofie Van Parijs, Charles Wahle ii Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1—The NOAA Ocean Noise Strategy and Managed Species 6 Chapter 2—Can You Hear Me Here? Managing Acoustic Habitat in U.S. Waters 27 Chapter 3—Enhancing NOAA’s Ability to Characterize Aquatic Soundscapes 45 Chapter 4— NOAA Ocean Noise Strategy Implementation Case Studies 60 Case Study 1: Assessing the Risk of Chronic Noise from Commercial Ships to 63 Large Whale Acoustic Habitat Case Study 2: Managing Noise Impacts on Spawning Areas Used by 81 Acoustically Sensitive and Commercially Important Fish and Invertebrate Species Appendix A— The Status of Science for Assessing Noise Impacts on NOAA-Managed 91 Species Appendix B— Presence, Abundance, Distribution, Density, Habitat Use and 113 Population Trends Appendix C— Spreadsheet of Potential Authorities (e.g. Statutes, Executive Orders) 121 to Address Ocean Noise Issues Appendix D— NOAA Ocean Noise Strategy Cross-Office Team 138 iii List of Figures Page Figure 1-1. Potential Consequences of Disturbance conceptual model of the relationships 11 linking disturbance to changes in behavior and physiology, health, vital rates, and population dynamics. Figure 2-1. Illustration of potential acoustically-mediated information in a marine 28 community.
    [Show full text]
  • Rendezvous and Proximity Operations of the Space Shuttle Source of Acquisition John L
    FROM :UNITED SfffCE RLL I FINE 281 212 6326 2005s 08-11 09: 34 #127 P. 05/21 Rendezvous and Proximity Operations of the Space Shuttle Source of Acquisition John L. Gooban' NASA JO~~SO~Space Center Uniied Space Albance, LLC, Hou.Wm. Texas: 77058 Spnce Shuttle rendmous missinns presented unique chalfengcs Clint were not fully recogni;ccd altea the Shutde WH~:deslgned. Rendezvous hrgcte could be passive (Le., no lights or Wnnrponders), and not designad 10 BcllIfate Shuttro rendezvous, praxlntlty operfirttlons and rclricval. Shuttls rendon control system ]ct plume lmplngetnent nn target spacccmfl prewnrcd Induced dynnmlcs, structoral loading and conhmlndon concerns. These Issues, along with fliiilfed forWard raction control system prupcllxnf drove II change from the GcmlniiApollo cuuillptlc profile heritage to a stnbte orbit proflle. and the development of new prorlmlly opcrntlons techniqucs. Multiple xckiitlfic and an-orbit servicing. tlssions; and crew exchanp, nsocmbly and rcplenlshment nigh& to Mir and io the InlernnBonnf Space S(Bfi0n dmve further pmfflc and pilnfing technique change%,lrcluding new rciative naviptlon senran gnd new ciwputcr generated piloting CPCS. Nomenclature the issucs with Shuffle rmdczvous md proximity operatiom had been f1.111~identified and resolved, which in N~Ircsultcd in complcx H Bar = unit vector along &e =get orbital angular illomcntum opmntionnl work-wounds. koposds for \chicle cepabiiitia vector competed for funding based on available budget, Bvaihbk schcduk, and criticality to Safety and mission success. Technical challenges in ix = LVLH +X axis vcctor $ = LTL~*Wrnk~CIOT ---b-uilding-~wsable~~~'~prt~.c~~-s~c~as propubion, &txid -tr- Lv&--i.Z-xiwe~oT---- _-- . protwtion.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-134 Press
    CONTENTS Section Page STS-134 MISSION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................ 1 STS-134 TIMELINE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 9 MISSION PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 11 MISSION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 13 MISSION PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................. 15 STS-134 ENDEAVOUR CREW .................................................................................................. 17 PAYLOAD OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 25 ALPHA MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER-2 .................................................................................................. 25 EXPRESS LOGISTICS CARRIER 3 ......................................................................................................... 31 RENDEZVOUS & DOCKING ....................................................................................................... 43 UNDOCKING, SEPARATION AND DEPARTURE ....................................................................................... 44 SPACEWALKS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    Conference Program 24th WRMISS Conference Program: Tuesday 3rd September 2019 08.30 – 09:00 Registration 09.00 – 10:00 Opening 10.00 – 10:30 Scientific Session 1 10.30 – 11.30 Coffee/Tea Break 11.30 – 13:00 Scientific Session 2 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch 14.00 – 15:30 Scientific Session 3 15.30 – 16:30 Coffee/Tea Break 16:30 – 18.15 Scientific Session 4 Major of Athens, Ministry of Ministry of digital policy Ministry of Ministry of Development and Investment Opening speeches President of Hellenic Space Center Greek ESA‐ representative NASA Radiation Health Officer: Edward Semones Guenther Reitz, Marianthi Fragopoulou Welcome and Organisational Issues Scientific Session 1 Reviewing ISS‐member cancer and non‐cancer risk models and their Samy El‐Jaby differences for exploration class missions Scientific Session 2 Xiaojing Xu Validation of Trapped Proton Environments with EFT‐1 Measurements Solar Modulation, Forbush decreases and Solar Particle Events by AMS Claudio Cordi onboard ISS Validation of NASA’s Radiation Analysis Tools with ISS Radiation Martha Clowdsley Environment (REM) Measurements Scientific Session 3 Pawel Bilski Fluorescent Nuclear Track detectors based on LiF single crystals Lawrence Pinsky The Timepix 2 from the Medipix 2 Collaboration – First results The AMS‐02 experiment as a cosmic ray flux and radiation monitor on the Valerie Formato ISS Scientific Session 4 GCR flux and dose rates variations observed experimentally by 13 Liulin Tsvetan Dachev Type instruments between 1991 and 2019 Attila Hirn Pille Measurements on ISS (February
    [Show full text]
  • Porównanie Skuteczności Urządzeń Oxybaria S I Laserobaria S W Skojarzonym Leczeniu Fizykalnym Owrzodzeń Kończyn Dolnych
    Lekarz Mikołaj Pietrzak Porównanie skuteczności urządzeń Oxybaria S i Laserobaria S w skojarzonym leczeniu fizykalnym owrzodzeń kończyn dolnych Rozprawa na stopień doktora nauk medycznych Promotor: prof. dr hab. n. med. Grzegorz Cieślar Katedra i Oddział Kliniczny Chorób Wewnętrznych, Angiologii i Medycyny Fizykalnej Kierownik Katedry: prof. dr hab. n. med. Grzegorz Cieślar Wydział Lekarski z Oddziałem Lekarsko-Dentystycznym w Zabrzu Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach Zabrze 2019 Pobrano z Repozytorium Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach / Downloaded from Repository of Medical University of Silesia 2021-09-26 Mikołaj Pietrzak Oddział Kliniczny Chorób Wewnętrznych, Angiologii i Medycyny Fizykalnej Szpitala Specjalistycznego nr 2 w Bytomiu 41-902 Bytom, ul. Batorego 15 e-mail: [email protected] RECENZENCI: Prof. dr hab. n. med. Andrzej Szuba Katedra i Klinika Angiologii, Nadciśnienia Tętniczego i Diabetologii Wydział Lekarski Kształcenia Podyplomowego Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu Dr hab. n. o kult. fiz. Jan Szczegielniak Prof. nadzw. PO Katedra Fizjoterapii Klinicznej Instytut Fizjoterapii Wydział Wychowania Fizycznego i Fizjoterapii Politechnika Opolska w Opolu 1 Pobrano z Repozytorium Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach / Downloaded from Repository of Medical University of Silesia 2021-09-26 SPIS TREŚCI WYKAZ STOSOWANYCH SKRÓTÓW…………………………………………. 4 WYKAZ TABEL……………………………………………………………………. 6 WYKAZ RYCIN…………………………………………………………………….. 8 1. WSTĘP…………………………………………………………………………. 9 1.1. Rany przewlekłe………………………………………………………….... 9 1.1.1. Definicja, epidemiologia, powikłania……………………………….. 9 1.1.2. Etiopatogeneza owrzodzeń w obrębie kończyn dolnych ………… 10 1.1.3. Proces gojenia ran przewlekłych…………………………………… 13 1.1.4. Leczenie owrzodzeń w obrębie kończyn dolnych ………………… 15 1.1.5. Rokowanie w przypadku owrzodzeń w obrębie kończyn dolnych 16 1.2. Wybrane metody fizykalne stosowane w leczeniu owrzodzeń kończyn dolnych……………………………………………………………………… 17 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle
    Order Code RL33568 The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Updated November 9, 2007 Carl E. Behrens Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Summary The International Space Station (ISS) program began in 1993, with Russia joining the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada. Crews have occupied ISS on a 4-6 month rotating basis since November 2000. The U.S. Space Shuttle, which first flew in April 1981, has been the major vehicle taking crews and cargo back and forth to ISS, but the shuttle system has encountered difficulties since the Columbia disaster in 2003. Russian Soyuz spacecraft are also used to take crews to and from ISS, and Russian Progress spacecraft deliver cargo, but cannot return anything to Earth, since they are not designed to survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere. A Soyuz is always attached to the station as a lifeboat in case of an emergency. President Bush, prompted in part by the Columbia tragedy, made a major space policy address on January 14, 2004, directing NASA to focus its activities on returning humans to the Moon and someday sending them to Mars. Included in this “Vision for Space Exploration” is a plan to retire the space shuttle in 2010. The President said the United States would fulfill its commitments to its space station partners, but the details of how to accomplish that without the shuttle were not announced. The shuttle Discovery was launched on July 4, 2006, and returned safely to Earth on July 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation71.Pdf
    The KiboCUBE Programme December 14, 2017 United Nations / South Africa Symposium on Basic Space Technology “Small satellite missions for scientific and technological advancement” Masanobu TSUJI Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) 1 Credit : JAXA/NASA ISS: Japan’s Capabilities and Contributions ISS Kibo (International Space Station) (Japanese Experiment Module) HTV (H-II Transfer Vehicle) ▪ ISS is a huge manned construction located about 400km above the Earth. ▪ 15 countries participate in the ISS program ▪ Japan strives to make concrete international contributions through extensive utilization of Kibo and HTV. H-IIB Credit : JAXA/NASA 2 ISS: Japan’s Capabilities and Contributions Kibo: Japanese Experiment Module Kibo has a unique Exposed Facility (EF) with an Airlock (AL) and a Remote Manipulator System (JEMRMS), and has a high capacity to exchange experimental equipment. Robotic Arm (JEM-Remote Manipulator System) Airlock Credit : JAXA/NASA 3 “Kibo” is Unique! – Exposed Facility Small Satellite Deployment platform using J-SSOD AtIn present,recent years, satellite a growing deployers numberother ofthan universities J-SSOD andthat companiesuse Kibo include around the world have beenthe NanoRacks developing CubeSat the DeployerMicro/Nano (NRCSD)-satellite and (under 100kg, mainlyCyclops CubeSat). (Space Station Integrated Kinetic Launcher for Orbital Payload Systems). Credit : JAXA/NASA J-SSOD#2 NRCSD#1 Cyclops#1 J-SSOD Microsat#1 J-SSOD#1 J-SSOD Upgrade#1 4 Ref: Prof. 2017 Nano/Microsatellite Market Forecast (SpaceWorks Enterprises
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Arm.Indd
    Ages: 8-12 Topic: Engineering design and teamwork Standards: This activity is aligned to national standards in science, technology, health and mathematics. Mission X: Train Like an Astronaut Next Generation: 3-5-ETS1-2. Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely A Robotic Arm to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be EDUCATOR SECTION (PAGES 1-7) improved. STUDENT SECTION (PAGES 8-15) Background Why do we need robotic arms when working in space? As an example, try holding a book in your hands straight out in front of you and not moving them for one or two minutes. After a while, do your hands start to shake or move around? Imagine how hard it would be to hold your hands steady for many days in a row, or to lift something really heavy. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a really long arm that never gets tired? Well, to help out in space, scientists have designed and used robotic arms for years. On Earth, scientists have designed robotic arms for everything from moving heavy equipment to performing delicate surgery. Robotic arms are important machines that help people work on Earth as well as in space. Astronaut attached to a robotic arm on the ISS. Look at your arms once again. Your arms are covered in skin for protection.
    [Show full text]