DOCSLIB.ORG

CORE4 Conservation Practices Training Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CORE4 Conservation Practices Training Guide CORE4 United States Conservation Department of Agriculture Practices Natural Resources Conservation Service Training Guide The Common Sense Approach to Natural Resource Conservation · Conservation Tillage · Nutrient Management · Pest Management · Buffers CORE4—Key Conservation Practices Introduction The purpose of this workbook is to enhance the technical knowledge of Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) personnel and their col- leagues in both the public and private sector and to assist them in helping landowners effectively use conservation tillage, nutrient management, pest management, and conservation buffers. These key practices significantly reduce nonpoint sources of pollution from cropland as well as provide opportunities for many other conservation benefits when applied as a system. These few practices do not, however, exclude consideration for other practices or systems designed to protect the natural resources related to cropland agriculture. In January 1998, the NRCS through the National Conservation Buffer Initia- tive sponsored a Conservation Buffer Conference in San Antonio, Texas. During this conference several national experts expressed concern about the long-term functioning of conservation buffers without a systems ap- proach to address nutrients, pesticides, and sedimentation. The CORE4 concept was established by the Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) and supporting organizations as an information and marketing plan to promote the voluntary approach to conservation emphasizing conservation tillage, pest management, nutrient management, and conservation buffers. CORE4, to a large degree, is the result of a public survey and a series of public forums designed to capture the opinions and suggestions of farmers and ranchers, as well as other groups with a vested interest in reducing nonpoint sources of pollution on a voluntary basis. The concept is presented as a "common-sense" approach, meaning an easily understood system of conservation practices that solve many of the natural resource concerns associated with cropland agriculture. NRCS is supporting the CTIC/CORE4 marketing plan in a cooperative effort with many other conservation partners. The objective is to focus on cost- effective systems that can be planned and installed with limited technical and financial assistance. Within NRCS CORE4 is much more. It is • Providing a team of technical specialists to provide assistance to states. • Developing job sheets and modifying them to meet application needs. • Encouraging statewide training to NRCS employees and public and private partners. • Providing assistance for state conservation practice standard develop- ment or revisions. • Providing support for demonstration projects. The material in this book is designed to improve user knowledge and under- standing of the function, value, and management of this family of practices. In addition to improving water quality, these practices can improve soil quality, air quality, wildlife habitat, and aesthetics. Carbon sequestration is another benefit expected from the widespread application of these practices. This material is available to partnering agencies, private industry, special- interest groups, and other interested individuals. The job sheets and pre- pared training materials are presented from a national perspective. Where appropriate, the guidance should be tailored to fit local conditions. Core4 Conservation Practices, August 1999 i CORE4 Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge the technical input of the many specialists who assisted in the development of this material. Conservation Tillage Dave Lightle, NRCS agronomist, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska Dave Schertz, NRCS national agronomist, Washington, DC Dan Towery, NRCS natural resource specialist, CTIC, West Lafayette, Indiana Arnold King, NRCS resource conservationist, Fort Worth, Texas Nutrient Management Jerry Lemunyon, NRCS nutrient management specialist, Fort Worth, Texas Bill Kuenstler, NRCS agronomist, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas Stephanie Aschmann, NRCS agroecologist, Watershed Sciences Institute, Lincoln, Nebraska Dave Moffitt, NRCS environmental engineer, National Water Management Center, Fort Worth, Texas Pest Management Joe Bagdon, NRCS pest management specialist, Amherst, Massachusetts Jerry Lemunyon, NRCS nutrient management specialist, Fort Worth, Texas Ken Pfeiffer, NRCS agronomist, Water and Climate Center, Portland, Oregon Ben Smallwood, NRCS national pest management specialist, Washington, DC Conservation Buffers Jerry Bratton, FS agroforester, National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, Nebraska Seth Dabney, ARS research agronomist, Sedimentation Lab, Oxford, Mississippi Bill Donham, NRCS agronomist, Stephenville, Texas Jerry Grigar, NRCS agronomist, East Lansing, Michigan Hank Henry, NRCS biologist, Watershed Sciences Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina Jerry Lemunyon, NRCS nutrient management specialist, Fort Worth, Texas Dave Lightle, NRCS agronomist, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska Valerie Oksendahl, NRCS soil conservationist, Lewiston, Montana Ken Pfeiffer, NRCS agronomist, Water and Climate Center, Portland, Oregon Charlie Rewa, NRCS biologist, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute, Laurel, Maryland Jim Robinson, NRCS agroforester, National Agroforestry Center, Fort Worth, Texas Don Stettler, NRCS environmental engineer, Water and Climate Center, Portland, Oregon Lyn Townsend, NRCS forest ecologist, Watershed Sciences Institute, Seattle, Washington Gary Wells, NRCS landscape architect, National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, Nebraska Bruce Wight, NRCS agroforester, National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, Nebraska ii Core4 Conservation Practices, August 1999 Key Conservation Practices A very special thanks to Kim Isaacson and Clover Shelton of the Na- tional Agroforestry Center for compiling and layout of the material; Dianne Johnson, Grazing Lands Technology Institute for assembling materials and secretarial assistance; Mary Mattinson for editorial assistance; and to the National Production Services Staff for their assistance in publishing. Contact Information for Core4 Specialists Name Location Phone Fax Email Aschmann, Stefanie WSSI, Lincoln, NE 402-437-5178 x43 402-437-5712 [email protected] Bagdon, Joe NWCC, Amherst, MA 413-253-4376 413-253-4375 [email protected] Bratton, Jerry NAC, Lincoln, NE 402-437-5178 x 24 402-437-5712 jbratton/[email protected] Dabney, Seth ARS, Oxford, MS 601-232-2975 601-232-2915 [email protected] Donham, William Stephenville, TX 254-965-3213 254-965-2492 [email protected] Grigar, Jerry East Lansing, MI 517-337-6701 x 1228 517-337-6905 [email protected] Henry, Hank WSSI, Raleigh, NC 919-515-4181 919-513-1420 [email protected] King, Arnold ECS, Fort Worth, TX 817-509-3213 817-509-3210 [email protected] Kuenstler, Bill NCGC, Fort Worth, TX 817-509-3363 817-509-3469 [email protected] Lemunyon, Jerry Fort Worth, TX 817-509-3216 817-509-3210 [email protected] Lightle, Dave NSSC, Lincoln, NE 402-437-4008 402-437-5336 [email protected] Moffitt, Dave NWMC, Fort Worth, TX 817-509-3315 817-509-3486 [email protected] Oksendahl, Valerie Lewiston, MT 406-538-7401 406-538-9353 [email protected] Pfeiffer, Ken NWCC, Portland, OR 503-414-3061 503-414-3101 [email protected] Rewa, Charles WHMI, Laurel, MD 301-497-5657 301-497-5911 [email protected] Robinson, Jim NAC, Fort Worth, TX 817-509-3215 817-509-3210 [email protected] Schertz, Dave ECS, Washington, DC 202-720-3783 202-720-2646 [email protected] Schnepf, Max SWCS, Ankeny, IA 515-289-2331 x 15 515-289-1227 [email protected] Smallwood, Benjamin ECS, Washington, DC 202-720-7838 202-720-2646 [email protected] Stettler, Don NWCC, Portland, OR 503-414-3076 503-414-3101 [email protected] Towery, Dan CTIC, W. Lafayette, IN 765-494-6952 765-494-5969 [email protected] Townsend, Lyn WSSI, Seattle, WA 206-616-8414 206-616-8417 [email protected] Wells, Gary NAC, Lincoln, NE 402-437-5178 x 41 402-437-5712 [email protected] Wight, Bruce NAC, Lincoln, NE 402-437-5178 x 36 402-437-5712 [email protected] Core4 Conservation Practices, August 1999 iii CORE4 iv Core4 Conservation Practices, August 1999 CORE4 Key Conservation Practices Contents Part 1 Conservation Tillage Chapter 1 Introduction to Crop Residue Management and ........................... 1 Conservation Tillage Chapter 2 Impacts of Residue Management Practices ................................... 3 Chapter 3 Planning and Design of Residue Management Systems Part A—No-till/Strip-Till ................................................................. 11 Part B—Mulch-Till ........................................................................... 17 Chapter 4 Conservation Tillage Equipment ................................................... 23 Chapter 5 Crop Management ........................................................................... 33 Chapter 6 Economic Considerations—Conservation Tillage ...................... 37 Chapter 7 New Technology .............................................................................. 41 Appendix Residue Retention Values ............................................................... 43 Part 2 Nutrient Management Chapter 1 Nutrient Management Planning—Overview .................................. 1 Chapter 2 Nutrient Management Planning ..................................................... 13 Chapter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Metabolic Inhibitors on the Translocation of Auxins
    EFFECTS OF METABOLIC INHIBITORS ON THE TRANSLOCATION OF AUXINS By DAMELIS DIAZ DE CEQUEA q Licenciado in Biology Universidad of Oriente Cumana, Venezuela 1976 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 1986 -rkto~~~ I 1:{ (; 0 5'/Je Cop " EFFECTS OF METABOLIC INHIBITORS ON THE TRANSLOCATION OF AUXINS Thesis Approved: 1251232 ~ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my most sincere gratitude to Dr. Eddie Basler for his guidance, time and training during the course of this research. I wish to thank Dr. Glenn W. Todd and Dr. Becky Johnson for being members of my graduate committee. I also want to thank Jean Pittman Winters, Trina Wheless, and Roberto Machado for their valuable help received during experiment preparations, and Bobby Winters for his time dedicated to preparing some of the computer programs. Special acknowledgement is due to my husband Hernan, my son Hernan Alejandro, and my family for their constant love and support during my graduate career, without them I would not have been able to achieve this goal. I want to express my gratitude to Dr. John Vitek, Assistant Dean of the Graduate Collage, and Dr. Glenn Todd, Botany Department Head, for giving me the opportunity to study in this University. Finally, I want to recognize the financial support received from Universidad de Oriente Cumana, Venezuela during my time in the U.S.A. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION. • . • • . • 1 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS....................................... 8 III. RESULTS ..•....•.................................•..........• 11 Comparison of the Effect of DCCD and1RIDS on the Tray~location of 2,4,5-T-1- C and IAA -1- C.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping Near Black Walnut Trees
    Selecting juglone-tolerant plants Landscaping Near Black Walnut Trees Black walnut trees (Juglans nigra) can be very attractive in the home landscape when grown as shade trees, reaching a potential height of 100 feet. The walnuts they produce are a food source for squirrels, other wildlife and people as well. However, whether a black walnut tree already exists on your property or you are considering planting one, be aware that black walnuts produce juglone. This is a natural but toxic chemical they produce to reduce competition for resources from other plants. This natural self-defense mechanism can be harmful to nearby plants causing “walnut wilt.” Having a walnut tree in your landscape, however, certainly does not mean the landscape will be barren. Not all plants are sensitive to juglone. Many trees, vines, shrubs, ground covers, annuals and perennials will grow and even thrive in close proximity to a walnut tree. Production and Effect of Juglone Toxicity Juglone, which occurs in all parts of the black walnut tree, can affect other plants by several means: Stems Through root contact Leaves Through leakage or decay in the soil Through falling and decaying leaves When rain leaches and drips juglone from leaves Nuts and hulls and branches onto plants below. Juglone is most concentrated in the buds, nut hulls and All parts of the black walnut tree produce roots and, to a lesser degree, in leaves and stems. Plants toxic juglone to varying degrees. located beneath the canopy of walnut trees are most at risk. In general, the toxic zone around a mature walnut tree is within 50 to 60 feet of the trunk, but can extend to 80 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Walnut Toxicity
    General Horticulture • HO-193-W Department of Horticulture Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service • West Lafayette, IN BLACK WALNUT TOXICITY Michael N. Dana and B. Rosie Lerner Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) is a valuable hardwood to be a respiration inhibitor which deprives sensitive lumber tree and Indiana native. In the home landscape, plants of needed energy for metabolic activity. black walnut is grown as a shade tree and, occasionally, for its edible nuts. While many plants grow well in The largest concentrations of juglone and hydrojuglone proximity to black walnut, there are certain plant species (converted to juglone by sensitive plants) occur in the whose growth is hindered by this tree. The type of walnut’s buds, nut hulls, and roots. However, leaves and relationship between plants in which one produces a stems do contain a smaller quantity. Juglone is only substance which affects the growth of another is know poorly soluble in water and thus does not move very far as “allelopathy.” in the soil. Awareness of black walnut toxicity dates back at least to Since small amounts of juglone are released by live Roman times, when Pliny noted a poisoning effect of roots, particularly juglone-sensitive plants may show walnut trees on “all” plants. More recent research has toxicity symptoms anywhere within the area of root determined the specific chemical involved and its mode growth of a black walnut tree. However, greater quanti­ of action. Many plants have been classified through ties of juglone are generally present in the area immedi­ observation as either sensitive or tolerant to black ately under the canopy of a black walnut tree, due to walnuts.
    [Show full text]
  • Omics Methods for Probing the Mode of Action of Natural and Synthetic Phytotoxins
    J Chem Ecol DOI 10.1007/s10886-013-0240-0 REVIEW ARTICLE Omics Methods for Probing the Mode of Action of Natural and Synthetic Phytotoxins Stephen O. Duke & Joanna Bajsa & Zhiqiang Pan Received: 31 October 2012 /Revised: 20 December 2012 /Accepted: 31 December 2012 # The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract For a little over a decade, omics methods (tran- Introduction scriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and physionomics) have been used to discover and probe the mode of action of Understanding the modes of action of natural compounds as both synthetic and natural phytotoxins. For mode of action toxicants is important for at least two reasons. From an eco- discovery, the strategy for each of these approaches is to logical and evolutionary standpoint, knowing the mode of generate an omics profile for phytotoxins with known mo- action of such compounds is critical to understanding the lecular targets and to compare this library of responses to the function of the compound in nature. For example, the high responses of compounds with unknown modes of action. activity of phytotoxins from plant pathogens on specific mo- Using more than one omics approach enhances the proba- lecular targets found in green plants, but not in fungi, provides bility of success. Generally, compounds with the same mode strong evidence that the compounds have evolved as virulence of action generate similar responses with a particular omics factors for the pathogens (Duke and Dayan, 2011). From a method. Stress and detoxification responses to phytotoxins more practical standpoint, natural compounds often have been can be much clearer than effects directly related to the target the source of pesticides with new modes of action (Dayan et site.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction of Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction by Juglone Affects the Development of Bovine Oocytes
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Induction of Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction by Juglone Affects the Development of Bovine Oocytes Ahmed Atef Mesalam 1,2,†, Marwa El-Sheikh 1,3,†, Myeong-Don Joo 1, Atif Ali Khan Khalil 4 , Ayman Mesalam 5 , Mi-Jeong Ahn 6 and Il-Keun Kong 1,7,8,* 1 Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea; [email protected] (A.A.M.); [email protected] (M.E.-S.); [email protected] (M.-D.J.) 2 Department of Therapeutic Chemistry, Division of Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt 3 Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt 4 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan; [email protected] 5 Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt; [email protected] 6 College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea; [email protected] 7 Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea 8 Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Juglone, a major naphthalenedione component of walnut trees, has long been used in traditional medicine as an antimicrobial and antitumor agent. Nonetheless, its impact on oocyte and preimplantation embryo development has not been entirely clarified. Using the bovine model, we sought to elucidate the impact of juglone treatment during the in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes Citation: Mesalam, A.A.; El-Sheikh, on their maturation and development of embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • Allelochemicals and Signaling Chemicals in Plants
    Review Allelochemicals and Signaling Chemicals in Plants Chui-Hua Kong 1,*, Tran Dang Xuan 2,*, Tran Dang Khanh 3,4, Hoang-Dung Tran 5 and Nguyen Thanh Trung 6 1 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China 2 Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan 3 Agricultural Genetics Institute, Pham Van Dong Street, Hanoi 122000, Vietnam 4 Center for Expert, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam 5 Faculty of Biotechnology, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh 72820, Vietnam 6 Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.-H.K.); [email protected] (T.D.X.); Tel.: +86-10-62732752 (C.-H.K.); +81-82-424-6927 (T.D.X.) Academic Editor: Derek McPhee Received: 15 July 2019; Accepted: 25 July 2019; Published: 27 July 2019 Abstract: Plants abound with active ingredients. Among these natural constituents, allelochemicals and signaling chemicals that are released into the environments play important roles in regulating the interactions between plants and other organisms. Allelochemicals participate in the defense of plants against microbial attack, herbivore predation, and/or competition with other plants, most notably in allelopathy, which affects the establishment of competing plants. Allelochemicals could be leads for new pesticide discovery efforts. Signaling chemicals are involved in plant neighbor detection or pest identification, and they induce the production and release of plant defensive metabolites. Through the signaling chemicals, plants can either detect or identify competitors, herbivores, or pathogens, and respond by increasing defensive metabolites levels, providing an advantage for their own growth.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0053773A1 ARMEL Et Al
    US 2011 0053773A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0053773A1 ARMEL et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 3, 2011 (54) METHODS OF IMPROVING NUTRITONAL Publication Classification VALUE OF PLANTS (51) Int. Cl. AOIN 25/32 (2006.01) CI2O 1/02 (2006.01) (75) Inventors: GREGORY RUSSELLARMEL, AOIN 57/6 (2006.01) Knoxville, TN (US); Dean Adam AOIN 43/40 (2006.01) Kopsell, Knoxville, TN (US); AOIN 43/88 (2006.01) James T. Brosnan, Knoxville, TN AOIN 43/70 (2006.01) AOIN 43/653 (2006.01) (US); Brandon J. Horvath, AOIN 47/40 (2006.01) Knoxville, TN (US); John C. AOIN 37/22 (2006.01) Sorochan, Knoxville, TN (US) AOIN 35/06 (2006.01) AOIP3/00 (2006.01) AOIP 2L/00 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AOIP 7/04 (2006.01) RESEARCH FOUNDATION, AOIP5/00 (2006.01) KNOXVILLE, TN (US) AOIPI3/00 (2006.01) AOIP I/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ........... 504/107:435/29; 504/103: 504/108; (21) Appl. No.: 12/875,328 504/128; 504/130, 504/131:504/133; 504/134; 504/139; 504/141; 504/149; 504/234: 504/348 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: Sep. 3, 2010 The subject application provides methods for the direct or indirect improvement of levels of key phytonutrients and/or stress tolerance in plants. Methods of providing for the Related U.S. Application Data improvement in key phytonutrient levels and/or stress toler ance in plants are provided through the application of Safen (60) Provisional application No. 61/239,602, filed on Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Resistance: Toward an Understanding of Resistance Development and the Impact of Herbicide-Resistant Crops William K
    Weed Science 2012 Special Issue:2–30 Herbicide Resistance: Toward an Understanding of Resistance Development and the Impact of Herbicide-Resistant Crops William K. Vencill, Robert L. Nichols, Theodore M. Webster, John K. Soteres, Carol Mallory-Smith, Nilda R. Burgos, William G. Johnson, and Marilyn R. McClelland* Table of Contents and how they affect crop production and are affected by management practices, and to present the environmental impacts Executive Summary……………………………………… 2 of herbicide-resistant crops. This paper will summarize aspects of I. Introduction: A Summary of Weed Science Practices herbicide resistance in five different sections: (1) a description of and Concepts………………………………………… 3 basic weed science management practices and concepts, (2) II. Resistance and Tolerance in Weed Science………… 12 definitions of resistance and tolerance in weed science, (3) envi- III. Environmental Impacts of Herbicide Resistance in ronmental impacts of herbicide-resistant crops, (4) strategies for Crops………………………………………………… 15 management of weed species shifts and herbicide-resistant weeds IV. Strategies for Managing Weed Species Shifts and Devel- and adoption by the agricultural community, and (5) gene-flow opment of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds…………………… 16 potential from herbicide-resistant crops. V. Gene Flow from Herbicide-Resistant Crops………… 19 Literature Cited…………………………………………… 24 Section 1: Introduction. To avoid or delay the development of resistant weeds, a diverse, integrated program of weed management practices is required to minimize reliance
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Control of Common Purslane (<I>Portulaca Oleracea</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research in Agronomy and Horticulture Agronomy and Horticulture Department Fall 9-9-2013 Biology and Control of Common Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) Christopher A. Proctor University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronhortdiss Part of the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Proctor, Christopher A., "Biology and Control of Common Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.)" (2013). Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research in Agronomy and Horticulture. 68. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronhortdiss/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research in Agronomy and Horticulture by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. BIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF COMMON PURSLANE (PORTULACA OLERACEA L.) by Christopher A. Proctor A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Agronomy Under the Supervision of Professor Zachary J. Reicher Lincoln, Nebraska September, 2013 BIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF COMMON PURSLANE (PORTULACA OLERACA L.) Christopher A. Proctor, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2013 Adviser: Zachary J. Reicher Common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) is a summer annual with wide geographic and environmental distribution. Purslane is typically regarded as a weed in North America, but it is consumed as a vegetable in many parts of the world. One of the characteristics that make purslane difficult to control as a weed is its ability to vegetatively reproduce.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Background: Juglone (CASRN: 481-39-0)
    SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION Juglone 481-39-0 BASIS OF NOMINATION TO THE CSWG Juglone is brought to the attention of the CSWG as a potentially toxic natural product. Juglone, a brown dye, is found in several consumer products, including hair dye formulations and walnut oil stain. Juglone is an active ingredient in dietary supplements prepared from walnut hulls. Walnut hull extracts and poultices have been used for many years in folk remedies. There is some evidence to suggest that juglone is a potential chemotherapeutic or chemopreventive agent. The Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI) evaluated juglone in its screening panel for HIV-1. However, German Commission E does not approve the use of walnut hull as an herbal medicine because of documented or suspected risk from juglone. This raises questions about the safety of products intended for human consumption that contain juglone as an active ingredient. SELECTION STATUS ACTION BY CSWG: 6/22/99 Studies requested: Preliminary studies: - Mechanistic studies predictive of carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic potential - Metabolism studies - Mouse lymphoma assay - Mammalian mutagenicity assay Follow-up: Based on the results from the preliminary studies, select either juglone or plumbagin for carcinogenicity testing Priority: High Rationale/Remarks: - Natural brown pigment; widespread human exposure through use of walnut-based stains, oils, and dyes - Persistent environmental pollutant released from walnut and butternut trees - Given the close relationship between juglone and plumbagin, chronic studies of only the more reactive compound are recommended. - Existing information on the carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic potential of the two compounds is insufficient to determine which compound is more reactive.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Avens (Geum Canadense) DESCRIPTION
    Weed Identification and Control Sheet: www.goodoak.com/weeds Wood Avens (Geum canadense) DESCRIPTION: Wood avens is an adaptable, short-lived, weedy native perennial that can be found in any kind of shaded habitat in our region. It is found in small numbers even in healthy woods, but becomes very abundant in disturbed woodlands and groves of weedy trees and brush such as overgrown abandoned fields and pastures. This plant is tolerant to phytotoxic chemical Juglone released by leaves and roots of the walnut tree. Seeds cling to, and are efficiently distributed by, mam- mal fur, bird feathers, and clothing of humans. This attribute can make wood avens a bit of a nuisance where it has become over-abundant. Nectar and pollen from the small white flowers attract numerous spe- cies of bees, wasps, flies and beetles. IDENTIFICATION: Leaves of first-year plants are low to the ground and spread from a central point. These leaves are, linear, compound with many lobes and leaflets, and almost fern-like, often appear pale or frosted towards the center of the leaf and stem. On second year plants leaves on the lower stem are usually broad three-lobed, while upper leaves are typi- cally lobeless all with irregularly-toothed margins. Leaf surfaces are often covered with short, bristly hairs, especially along major veins. Small, white five-pedaled flowers bloom in clusters of 1-3 on top of each stem in mid-summer. Flowers are replaced by spheroid bundles of seeds with hooked tips. CONTROL METHODS: Organic: Generally control of this species is not needed, except in extreme cases.
    [Show full text]