Congressional Record—Senate S12880

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—Senate S12880 S12880 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 16, 2005 and too little. We lost American sol- real division within the administra- officials from ExxonMobil, Conoco be- diers’ lives and many were injured be- tion, and I would walk outside the Sen- fore its merger with Phillips, Shell Oil, cause we did not have the right equip- ate Intelligence Committee room and and BP America met in the White ment in place. hear statements made by the Vice House complex with Cheney aides who So now what we are saying is that President saying: There is no debate. It were developing the national energy this administration must be held ac- is all about nuclear weapons. policy, parts of which became law and countable, to report to Congress every Now, I could not repeat what I had parts of which are still being debated. 90 days to tell us in Congress the heard in the Senate Intelligence Com- It comes as no surprise. We suspected progress that is being made in pro- mittee. I was prohibited from saying it as much. A lawsuit was filed to specifi- tecting our troops, in preparing the publicly. I knew what he said was false. cally determine whether the oil com- Iraqis to defend their own country, in It is one of the reasons I voted against pany executives wrote this Energy bill. moving that country toward stability, that resolution to go to war in Iraq. That lawsuit was fought all the way to and in moving us to the point where But again and again the Vice Presi- the Supreme Court, and the Supreme American soldiers can start coming dent was taking information, intel- Court ruled that the White House home. That was passed yesterday, 79 to ligence information, giving it to the didn’t have to tell the American people 19. American people selectively, making who was involved. Now this memo tells As the President stood on Veterans certain that it was always the strong- us. Day and in an unprecedented political est spin toward the immediate need for The reason it is important is that speech attacked his Democratic critics a war, and that is how we ended up in last week the executives of these oil for saying they did not agree with his the position we are in today. companies came before Congress. You war policy, this Senate, on a bipartisan It is a lot easier to get into a war probably heard about the hearing be- basis yesterday, 79 to 19, said to the than it is to get out of one. And we fore the Senate Commerce Committee. President: Your policy in Iraq must have learned that with the cost in Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington change. We need to start looking to human lives and the cost to America’s insisted that these oil company execu- bring American soldiers home. And 2006 Treasury. tives be sworn in and testify under is the year to begin that process in ear- f oath, as the tobacco company execu- nest. tives did a few years ago. But Senator AMERICA’S ENERGY CRISIS That is why it was a historic vote. Of STEVENS, chairman of the committee, course, as we look at the statements Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, the sec- refused to allow them to be sworn in. made in the lead-up to the invasion of ond story on the front pages of this Why? So they couldn’t be held account- Iraq, there is a recurring theme. It morning’s newspapers relates to the able if they didn’t tell the truth. turns out that the major sources of in- energy crisis in America. You do not Unfortunately, some of the state- telligence that were passing through have to describe that to any American ments made in responses to questions the administration and to the Amer- who has filled up their gas tank in the by Senator LAUTENBERG raised serious ican people were passing across the last several months. And in the weeks questions as to whether those oil com- desk of Vice President CHENEY. ahead, when you start paying your pany executives were candid and forth- Lieutenant Colonel Wilkerson, chief home heating bills, if you live in one of coming in terms of their involvement of staff to Secretary of State Colin the colder parts of America, you will in this very bill, the Energy bill, which Powell, referred to a cabal, a cabal led see the energy problems we are facing. this memorandum tells us was pre- by Vice President CHENEY and Sec- Of course, it reflects the fact we have pared with the oil company executives. retary of Defense Rumsfeld, a cabal no energy policy in this country. In the Once again, the special interests which set the stage for the invasion of White House, with the President and trumped America’s families and con- Iraq. The man speaking was not a par- Vice President, we have two men who sumers, businesses and farmers. The tisan Democrat. He was the chief of have long careers with the energy in- Energy bill was written with the Vice staff to the Secretary of State in the dustries and with oil companies, and President’s direction that rewarded oil Bush administration, Colin Powell. I the energy policy they are pushing re- companies at a time when we should think it makes clear that throughout flects it. have been sensitive to protecting the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, our What did we have in the so-called En- American consumers. Unfortunately, it Vice President, RICHARD CHENEY, was ergy bill signed by the President just reflects what has been happening in making statements that did not reflect in August of this year? A $9 billion sub- this capital for too long. the truth of what was occurring in sidy to oil companies, a $9 billion sub- f Iraq. sidy to companies which are realizing Repeatedly, he said Iraq had links to record-breaking profits at this very LEWIS LIBBY INDICTMENT al-Qaida, and that was proven false. moment. Mr. DURBIN. The third issue is one Repeatedly, he said Iraq was an immi- Why in the world would we be send- which everyone is aware of; that is, the nent threat to the United States, and ing subsidies, Federal taxpayers’ dol- fact that for the first time in over a that was proven false. Repeatedly, Vice lars, to these oil companies at a mo- century, some high-level staffer in the President CHENEY said Iraq was trying ment in time when they are realizing White House has been indicted. Lewis to acquire nuclear weapons, and that the largest profits in history? I think ‘‘Scooter’’ Libby was indicted a few was proven false. every American knows why. When you weeks ago, charged with perjury and On ‘‘Meet the Press,’’ on March 16, go to the gas station to fill up your car obstruction of justice related to the 2003, the Vice President said: ‘‘And we or your truck, and you put that charge Valerie Plame affair. Everyone is believe he [Saddam Hussein] has, in on your credit card, the money from aware of it now. Joe Wilson, former fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.’’ your credit card is going directly to Ambassador, sent to Africa to deter- False. the boardrooms of these oil companies mine whether assertions by the admin- In addition, there were statements that are realizing more money than istration about yellow cake uranium made about whether Iraq was trying to they ever have in history. coming from Africa to Iraq were true, acquire uranium from Africa, state- We wanted to know who wrote the reached the conclusion they were not. ments made by the Vice President administration’s energy bill, and we When he published that conclusion, he which turned out to be false, and state- could not find out. Neither the Presi- was attacked in the press by Robert ments, of course, relative to aluminum dent nor the Vice President, who was Novak in a column where Mr. Novak tubes. I knew something about that de- leading the effort to create this energy said two White House sources had told bate because as a member of the Sen- policy, would tell the American people him that Joseph Wilson’s wife Valerie ate Intelligence Committee, I listened who was part of it. Plame was a CIA agent. as the Department of Defense and the This morning’s front page story in In fact, she was an undercover agent Department of Energy debated whether the Washington Post tells us who was whose identity was being protected. these aluminum tubes were really all part of it. A document obtained by the But the White House, in an effort to about nuclear weapons. There was a Washington Post this week shows that discredit its critics and to silence VerDate Aug 31 2005 03:49 Jan 08, 2007 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\RECORDCX\T37X$J0E\S16NO5.REC S16NO5 mmaher on PROD1PC70 with CONG-REC-ONLINE November 16, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S12881 them, attacked Joe Wilson’s wife Val- home for documents, accusing him of point because recent history goes a erie Plame and, in the process, dis- passing American secrets to the Ira- long way in explaining why the Amer- closed the identity of a CIA agent. nians and endangering American ican people want us to examine every There is a question raised as to wheth- troops and security. He is currently portion of Judge Alito’s record with er that violates the law.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 22. Case Study
    CHAPTER Case Study 22 A Tale of Two NIEs he two cases discussed in this chapter provide contrasting insights into the pro- Tcess of preparing intelligence estimates in the United States. They are presented here as the basis for a capstone set of critical thinking questions that are tied to the material discussed throughout this text. In 1990, the National Intelligence Council produced a national intelli- gence estimate (NIE)—the most authoritative intelligence assessment pro- duced by the intelligence community—on Yugoslavia. Twelve years later, the National Intelligence Council produced an NIE on Iraq’s WMD program. The Yugoslavia NIE • Used a sound prediction methodology • Got it right distribute • Presented conclusions that were anathema to U.S.or policymakers • Had zero effect on U.S. policy The Iraqi WMD NIE, in contrast, • Used a flawed prediction methodologypost, • Got it wrong • Presented conclusions that were exactly what U.S. policymakers wanted to hear • Provided supportcopy, to a predetermined U.S. policy This case highlights the differences in analytic approaches used in the two NIEs. Both NIEs now are available online. The full text of the “Yugoslavia Trans- formed” NIEnot is available at https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/1990- 10-01.pdf. In 2014, the CIA released the most complete copy (with previously redacted material) of the original “Iraq’s Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction” NIE. It is available at https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/ _general-reports-1/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm.Do The Yugoslavia NIE The opening statements of the 1990 Yugoslavia NIE contain four conclusions that were remarkably prescient: 420 Copyright ©2020 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Curveball Saga
    Bob DROGIN & John GOETZ: The Curveball Saga Los Angeles Times 2005, November 20 THE CURVEBALL SAGA How U.S. Fell Under the Spell of 'Curveball' The Iraqi informant's German handlers say they had told U.S. officials that his information was 'not proven,' and were shocked when President Bush and Colin L. Powell used it in key prewar speeches. By Bob Drogin and John Goetz, Special to The Times The German intelligence officials responsible for one of the most important informants on Saddam Hussein's suspected weapons of mass destruction say that the Bush administration and the CIA repeatedly exaggerated his claims during the run-up to the war in Iraq. Five senior officials from Germany's Federal Intelligence Service, or BND, said in interviews with The Times that they warned U.S. intelligence authorities that the source, an Iraqi defector code-named Curveball, never claimed to produce germ weapons and never saw anyone else do so. According to the Germans, President Bush mischaracterized Curveball's information when he warned before the war that Iraq had at least seven mobile factories brewing biological poisons. Then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell also misstated Curveball's accounts in his prewar presentation to the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003, the Germans said. Curveball's German handlers for the last six years said his information was often vague, mostly secondhand and impossible to confirm. "This was not substantial evidence," said a senior German intelligence official. "We made clear we could not verify the things he said." The German authorities, speaking about the case for the first time, also said that their informant suffered from emotional and mental problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Liability As Administrative Law
    Personal Liability as Administrative Law David Zaring* Abstract Administrative law has almost exclusively concerned itself with lawsuits against agencies as collective entities, under the auspices of the Administrative Procedure Act. In light of the growing number and prominence of suits by war on terror plaintiffs against senior government officials, this Article considers the use of personal liability to discipline government officials and assesses it as an alternative to traditional administrative law. It compares the civil suits to criminal prosecutions of these officials and compares both of them to less- obviously law related scandal campaigns. Personal sanctions—of which Bivens complaints are a principal example—are worth more attention. These mechanisms, and the constitutional tort in particular, are case studies of the popular inclination to decentralize government, of the value of symbolic laws, and, increasingly, of the personalization of law and politics. Solving some of the problems of personal liability, as it works today, might best be done not by enhancing the bite of the always-challenged lawsuits and prosecutions, but by making sure that the law makes it more possible for political cases to be made against government officials, rather than legal ones. Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................. 314 II. Three Kinds of Bivens Actions ..................................................... 319 A. The Doctrinal Problems for Plaintiffs ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Confidentiality Complications
    Confidentiality Complications: How new rules, technologies and corporate practices affect the reporter’s privilege and further demonstrate the need for a federal shield law The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press June 2007 Lucy A. Dalglish, Esq. Gregg P. Leslie, Esq. Elizabeth J. Soja, Esq. 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, Virginia 22209 (703) 807-2100 Executive Summary The corporate structure of the news media has created new obstacles, both financial and practical, for journalists who must keep promises of confidentiality. Information that once existed only in a reporter’s notebook can now be accessed by companies that have obligations not only to their reporters, but to their shareholders, their other employees, and the public. Additionally, in the wake of an unprecedented settlement in the Wen Ho Lee Privacy Act case, parties can target news media corporations not just for their access to a reporter’s information, but also for their deep pockets. The potential for conflicts of interest is staggering, but the primary concerns of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press are that: • because of the 21st-century newsroom’s reliance on technology, corporations now have access to notes, correspondence and work-product information that before only existed in a reporter’s notebook; • the new federal “e-discovery” court rules allow litigants to discover vastly more information than a printed page – or even a saved e-mail – would provide during litigation; • while reporters generally only have responsibilities to themselves,
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday We Mentioned Briefly the Alleged Iraq-Niger Deal Concerning
    Tuesday we mentioned briefly the alleged Iraq-Niger deal concerning shipping Iraq 500 tons of yellowcake {lightly enriched uranium oxide ore}, referenced to British sources in George Bush's State of the Union Speech, January, 2003. The story is murky and convoluted. Here are highlights: The Intelligence Community failed to authenticate in a timely fashion transparently forged documents purporting to show that Iraq had attempted to procure uranium from Niger. Finding 4: Robb-Silberman Report, 2004, "The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction." • A small Iraqi delegation visits Niger in 1999, reportedly for "expanding commercial relations" and other matters. • In late 2001, early 2002, three reports from a foreign liaison service state that an agreement was signed between Iraq and Niger to deliver 500 tons of yellowcake to Iraq. Intelligence analysts in the Dept. of State and some in CIA question the reliability of the source. The original documents, including a copy of the presumed agreement, is not received at this time. • Niger is an important producer of yellowcake; the mining operation is a consortium of nations, controlled by France. • The reporting of this proposed deal is included in a CIA briefing of Vice President Cheney in early 2002; he expresses interest in the report which originated with the DIA. CIA officials are skeptical, but decide to sent Ambassador Joseph Wilson, whose wife works undercover for CIA, to Niger to investigate the report. Wilson previously served in Niger and other African countries and has good contacts there. The CIA does not have a station in Niger.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 160 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 No. 82 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, May 30, 2014, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 The House met at 10 a.m. and was ment that my colleagues and I were proach me at Memorial Day events to called to order by the Speaker pro tem- prevented from offering an amendment say that they agree that Afghanistan is pore (Mr. BENTIVOLIO). to the NDAA dealing with the constitu- not worth the blood that has been shed f tional responsibility of Congress to de- there. Furthermore, they agreed with clare war. me that Afghanistan is not worth DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Like many Members of Congress, I America continuing to borrow money TEMPORE had the opportunity to speak at events from foreign nations, driving up fur- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday on ther the debt of our Nation to fund fore the House the following commu- Memorial Day weekend. Every time I President Karzai’s corrupt government nication from the Speaker: spoke, I mentioned my frustration that when we have a multitude of problems WASHINGTON, DC, the McGovern-Jones amendment was and needs right here in America. May 29, 2014. not able to be brought to the floor for Mr. Speaker, I would like to close my I hereby appoint the Honorable KERRY L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government Free
    FREE FAIR GAME: HOW A TOP SPY WAS BETRAYED BY HER OWN GOVERNMENT PDF Valerie Plame Wilson | 412 pages | 10 Jun 2008 | SIMON & SCHUSTER | 9781416537625 | English | New York, NY, United States Fair Game : How a Top CIA Agent Was Betrayed by Her Own Government, Paperback | eBay Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Laura Rozen Afterword. Get A Copy. More Details Edition Language. Other Editions 1. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Fair Gameplease sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. The book itself is well done and a worthy read. However, I gave the book five stars due to its importance both when it was Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government and now The behavior of the George W. Bush administration with regard to Iraq was shameful at many levels, clearly illegal, and undoubtedly immoral. Among other things this Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government helps the reader to realize, Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government total lie about the WMD that Iraq was alleged to have.
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Leaks Has to Change, but at What Expense to Congressional Oversight of the Executive Branch?
    SESSA_THE CULTURE OF LEAKS HAS TO CHANGE.DOCX 6/2/2014 5:00 PM “The culture of leaks has to change”1, but at what expense to congressional oversight of the Executive Branch? An examination of Title V. of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. Roseanne Sessa INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 236 I: INTELLIGENCE LEAKS AND CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT WITH RESPECT TO THE MEDIA......................................... 237 A. Unauthorized and Authorized Disclosures .............. 237 B. Congressional Oversight of the Executive Branch .. 239 C. Increase in Executive Power and Privilege Since September 11th ......................................................... 241 D. Historical National Security Leaks in the Media .... 242 E. Recent National Security Leaks in the Media ......... 244 II: THE INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 ....................................................................... 246 A. History and Purpose of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 .................. 246 B. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 .......................................................................... 247 C. § 505: Prohibition on Certain Individuals Serving as Consultants ......................................................... 248 D. § 506: Limitation on Persons Authorized to Communicate With the Media ................................ 248 III: CRITICISM AND RESPONSE .................................................. 249 A. Journalists
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Information and Judicial Evidentiary Standards
    811 INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND JUDICIAL EVIDENTIARY STANDARDS ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION................................... 811 II. FACT FINDERS .................................... 813 III. NUCLEAR CAPABILITY ........................... 820 IV. BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS........................... 836 V. CHEMICAL WEAPONS ............................ 845 VI. DELIVERY SYSTEMS .............................. 851 VII. M ENS REA ......................................... 854 VIII. INVOLVEMENT WITH TERRORISM ............... 855 IX. CONCLUSION ..................................... 875 I. INTRODUCTION Senator Kennedy called it "reprehensible" that the "administra- tion distorted, misrepresented and manipulated the intelligence" on Iraq.' Louis Fisher wrote: "There should be no question that the pre- war information was distorted, hyped, and fabricated. The October 2002 [National Intelligence Estimate ("NIE")] prepared by the intelli- gence community is plain evidence of that . ."2 University of Pitts- burgh President Jem Spectar contended that the "Bush administration exploited, furthered, manipulated or thrived on the public's confusion .... "3 Professor Yamamoto explained, "Many have documented this ad- ministration's penchant for deliberate misrepresentations on national security-in blunt terms, [and] for lying to the American people about threats at home and abroad."4 Harvard Emeritus Professor Stanley t MA Political Science (Michigan), MA Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. In- ternational Law (Georgetown). The author has taught courses in International Law at Cooley Law School and for the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, courses in American Government and Constitutional Law at Alma College, and courses in Business Law at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 1. J M Spectar, Beyond the Rubicon: PresidentialLeadership, InternationalLaw & The Use of Force in the Long Hard Slog, 22 CoN. J. Irr'iL L. 47, 90 (2006). 2. Louis Fisher, Lost ConstitutionalMoorings: Recovering the War Power, 81 IND.
    [Show full text]
  • This Week in History
    This Week in History 2005 September 29 | Judith Miller Released from Jail New York Times reporter Judith Miller is released from federal prison after agreeing to reveal her source in the Valerie Plame Affair. Robert Novak outs Valerie Plame as a CIA officer in a newspaper op-ed, but investigators believe Judith Miller has knowledge of the leaker and incarcerate her for refusing to cooperate. In 2008, Robert Novak is a guest of the Club, speaking at a Public Affairs luncheon on politics and his autobiography, The Prince of Darkness. 1890 October 1 | Yosemite National Park Created Through legislation, Congress creates Yosemite National Park, which is signed into law by honorary Club member and United States President Benjamin Harrison. Earlier in 1864, President Abraham Lincoln declared Yosemite Valley a public trust of California marking the first time the federal government conserved land for public recreational use. 1961 October 1 | Roger Maris’ Home Run Record Roger Maris hits his 61st home run in the fourth inning of the season’s final game to establish a Major League record at Yankee Stadium. Maris’ 61st home run breaks Babe Ruth’s 1927 single-season record of 60 home runs. 1863 October 3 | Thanksgiving Day Proclamation President Abraham Lincoln issues his Thanksgiving Day Proclamation, calling on Americans “in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving”. 1822 October 4 | Rutherford B. Hayes Born United States President Rutherford B.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRATION Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept from Hill Panel
    ADMINISTRATION Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel By Murray Waas, special to National Journal © National Journal Group Inc. Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2005 Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter. The information was provided to Bush on September 21, 2001 during the "President's Daily Brief," a 30- to 45-minute early-morning national security briefing. Information for PDBs has routinely been derived from electronic intercepts, human agents, and reports from foreign intelligence services, as well as more mundane sources such as news reports and public statements by foreign leaders. One of the more intriguing things that Bush was told during the briefing was that the few credible reports of contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda involved attempts by Saddam Hussein to monitor the terrorist group. Saddam viewed Al Qaeda as well as other theocratic radical Islamist organizations as a potential threat to his secular regime. At one point, analysts believed, Saddam considered infiltrating the ranks of Al Qaeda with Iraqi nationals or even Iraqi intelligence operatives to learn more about its inner workings, according to records and sources. The September 21, 2001, briefing was prepared at the request of the president, who was eager in the days following the terrorist attacks to learn all that he could about any possible connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump-Russia Investigations: a Guide
    TRUMP-RUSSIA INVESTIGATIONS: A GUIDE Faiza Patel, Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Douglas Keith, and Harsha Panduranga THE ISLAMOPHOBIC ADMINISTRATION | 1 Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from ending mass incarceration to preserving Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. Part think tank, part advocacy group, part cutting-edge communications hub, we start with rigorous research. We craft innovative policies. And we fight for them — in Congress and the states, the courts, and in the court of public opinion. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S LIBERTY AND NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM The Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program works to advance effective national security policies that respect constitutional values and the rule of law, using innovative policy recommendations, litigation, and public advocacy. The program focuses on reining in excessive government secrecy; ensuring that counterterrorism authorities are narrowly targeted to the terrorist threat; and securing adequate oversight and accountability mechanisms. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S PUBLICATIONS Red cover | Research reports offer in-depth empirical findings. Blue cover | Policy proposals offer innovative, concrete reform solutions. White cover | White papers offer a compelling analysis of a pressing legal or policy issue. © 2017. This paper is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http:// creativecommons.org).
    [Show full text]