DOCSLIB.ORG

Yellowstone Science Volume 6, Number 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Yellowstone Science A quarterly publication devoted to the natural and cultural resources ·A Chat with a Grizzly Bear Expert Carrion Beetles and Biodiversity. Observing Yellowstone Otters Volume 6 Number I The Legacy of Research As we begin a new year for Yellowstone But scientific understanding comes big and small. Studies ofnon-charismatic Science (the journal and, more important, slowly, often with p_ainstaking effort. creatures and features are as vital to our the program), we might consider the As a graduate student I was cautioned understanding the ecosystem as those of value of the varied research undertaken that my goal should not be to save the megafauna. in and around the park. It is popular in world with my research, but to contrib­ For 24 years, Dick Knight studied some circles to criticize the money we­ ute a small piece of knowledge from a one ofYellowstone's most famous and our society, not just the National Park Ser­ particular time and place to just one dis­ controversial species. With ?, bluntness vice-spend on science. Even many of cipline. I recalled this advice as I spoke atypical of most government bureau­ us who work within a scientific discipline with Nathan Varley, who in this issue crats, he answered much of what we admit that the ever-present "we need shares results of his work on river otters, demanded to know about grizzly bears, more data" can be both a truthful state­ about his worry that he could not defini­ never seeking the mantel of fame or ment and an excuse for not taking a stand. tively comment about their abundance. limelight that often falls easily upon Researchers themselves are often Otters have not previously been studied biologists who study endangered spe­ prone to apologize for not being able to here, and his observations oftheir behav­ cies. At the end of his career he mar­ give definitive answers to what may seem iors and distribution are a valuable con­ vels at how much there is still to learn, like simple questions. How many species tribution to Yellowstone science. and leaves us with a rich legacy of re­ are there in Yellowstone? How abundant Sandwiched between two stories of search added to the body of know ledge is each one? Should there be more, and popular favorites is Derek Sikes' article about grizzly bears. For myself and for what can we do to make it so? Our ea­ on canion beetles. His fascination with many others who value the wild crea­ gerness to learn and to do right in our the often-overlooked invertebrate fauna tures ofYellowstone, I say thank you, mission to conserve the park's compo­ comes through with humor as he reminds and farewell. nent species and ecological processes us how much we have yet to learn about makes us anxious to know with certainty. the complex interactions among species, SCM Yellowstone Science A quarterly publication devoted to the natural and cultural resources Volume 6 Number 1 Winter 1998 Table of Contents Holding on to Yellowstone's Grizzlies: A Parting 2 Chat with a 24-year Veteran of Yellowstone's Grizzly Bear Wars From the closure of garbage dumps to the recent expansion of bears throughout greater Yellowstone, one scientist was at the helm studying the threatened creatures throughout an array of controversies. Interview with Richard R. Knight Hidden Biodiversity: The Benefits of Large 10 Rotting Carcasses to Beetles and Other Species Rooting around in the detritus of the Lamar Valley, an entomologist probes the largest order of life on Earth and reminds us that vertebrate grazers, predators, and scavengers are only the tip of the iceberg in a complex ecological community. by Derek S. Sikes Editor Yellowstone's River Otters: Enigmatic Water 15 Sue Consolo-Murphy Art Director Weasels Renee Evanoff A biologist captures information about these little-studied animals-on film, and in a report that documents his observations of these elusive Associate Editor riverine residents of the riparian zone. Sarah Broadbent by Nathan Varley Assistant Editor Mary Ann Franke News and Notes 19 Printing • Draft Report Released on Brucellosis Science• Wolf Population Artcraft Inc. Growing • Cascade Geyser Rejuvenates • IGBST Gets New Leader • Bozeman, Montana Celebrating "People and Place" • Park Staff Test GPS Accuracy • Archeological Research Reveals New Information On the cover: Otter pup. See re­ lated story on page 15. Photo cour­ tesy Nathan Varley/Landis Wildlife Films. Above: Archeologicalfield­ work in Yellowstone. See page 20. Photo courtesy Mack Shortt. , , -?'_-;;· ~ '"-\.,, ,. V • ' \/,. r· ~ ,, ' " , J .t ""' ., ~ie~J, 4Jiiij mfSt~n'cifassociation lf.,ith DiCk 9nd his studj ~' pight, either~ J•-' :: .in•Wyoming an2K"din ,;;na,·_1{team. • ! So,j_di!n'thearfro)llhimuntilprob~, f h h v d ~• '" •i+* . "' ,- ., bl A m,• & d h "ll d d :·~ _w e'j e_~arne ... f :""l'.!!sa ~r~:.~ ..B>'i¾ ·" a~~ tu6 u~t~l11 e~a e meup~ i degre~.rc,}n.wrffil[Je l!f'logy. A e'!._'?!:· YS:,!J'.<:>w did~ get start~d studymg [s,qd] "Gladys and I were wondermg '. ing 1,1 _Bh.D. stud¥f'!,tlVfontand's Sulrbearii•·,/f:•.· . where we'd like to go for Labor ': :""Riv~®elther4,'1.fJjiis teaching at the,'•"DK: · }1, ,1as tired of teaching. I Day ... and she says, I'd like to go over ' University of'liJ1ff!ho when he., was'lured wante -to get ack in the field. I had a lot and visitthe Knights in Moscow, Idaho." "" ,e;e~ 'sJ:i! "'?, • a qp,,.· . , • it • away. F[e becarri.e'tlie'first-and until his ·•of·contact with bears when I was in the I said, "Well, the steelhead fishing's good, retirement in Sepiembe; 1997, the ;nly- Bob ~arshall Wilderness Area in Mon- come over." And I turned to my wife and head of the Interagency Grizzly Bear tana. I was slated to do a grizzly bear said "Something's wrong in Yellowstone Study Team (!GEST), created in the af- study up there, after I was done studying Park, because Glen never goes anyplace termath of a stormy parting between elk and sheep and deer; we never got for pleasure; there's something up." The Yellowstone National Park and brothers around to it. grizzly bear job was coming open, and Frank and John Craighead, who studied I first started working for Glen Cole Glen came over and said, "We've got this grizzly bears in the parkfrom 1959 until [supervisory research biologist for position, and I want you to apply for it." 1969. Dr. Knight has published numer- Yellowstone National Park from 1969 to YS: Did you see changing from water­ ous papers on the grizzly bears of _1975] in Montana, so we're old friends. fowl and ungulates to bears as a career Yellowstone and advised managers When I was in Idaho I kept bringing field shift, or as fish biologists would when through thorny controversies since the trips to Yellowstone every year, and I'd movingfromgraylingtotrout?Wereyou population was listed as "threatened" have dinner with Glen and Gladys and aware of how controversial it was? under the Endangered Species Act in we'd talk about old times. We had an ar- DK: It's just a different animal to work 1975. He was interviewed for gument in spring 1972, something to do on. If I had known what the next five Yellowstone Science in August of 1997 with natural regulation, and some as- years were going to be like, I'd still be by the editor and John Varley, Director sumptions that he was making that I running the other way! I'd been through of Yellowstone's Center for Resources, didn't think he could make. He just got a lot of controversies and stuff... but the both of whom have had a long profes- mad-I didn't get invited to dinner that feds-people stab you in the back for 2 Yellowstone Science (NAS) review ofthe grizzly bear data.] the Forest Service, all we got was office DK: This was before that started in 1974; space. And when Steve Judd left the Fish I'd been here a while. We'd have these and Wildlife Service, they took his money meetings, of a steering committee which to hire Chris Servheen, [as Grizzly Bear was like the IGBC [the present day 1n­ Recovery Coordinator]. Fish and Wild­ teragency Grizzly Bear Committee, made life Service kept giving us $25,000 a year up ofsenior agency managers]; it had six for quite a while, but a couple years ago agencies, and I had advice like you they gave that up because they didn't have couldn't believe. I had Starker Leopold the money. and Durward Allen putting in their two­ YS: Was it your idea or someone else's cents worth; you had to take their that stationed you in Bozeman, associ­ thoughts seriously. These people had ated with the Montana State University great ideas on what to do-I've got a list campus, a bit removed from Yellowstone ofthem someplace-it's about a foot long and the other land managers? of things to look at, with $47,000 in the DK: You know how that happened? At budget! the International Association of Fish and YS: Did that include your salary? Game Commissioners in 1974, they de­ DK: Yep! So I just went ahead and de­ cided to have a committee on grizzly cided what to do. Ofcourse, we couldn't bears. They said they didn't see how Dick Dick Knight setting a bear trap. Photo do much since we weren't allowed to tag Knight could be objective, since he was courtesy Bonnie Blanchard.
Recommended publications
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests

    Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests

    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
  • A Catalogue of Coleoptera Specimens with Potential Forensic Interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum Collection

    A Catalogue of Coleoptera Specimens with Potential Forensic Interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum Collection

    ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA Vol. 25, 2016 A catalogue of Coleoptera specimens with potential forensic interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection Dimaki Maria Goulandris Natural History Museum, 100 Othonos St. 14562 Kifissia, Greece Anagnou-Veroniki Maria Makariou 13, 15343 Aghia Paraskevi (Athens), Greece Tylianakis Jason Zoology Department, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/eh.11549 Copyright © 2017 Maria Dimaki, Maria Anagnou- Veroniki, Jason Tylianakis To cite this article: Dimaki, M., Anagnou-Veroniki, M., & Tylianakis, J. (2016). A catalogue of Coleoptera specimens with potential forensic interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection. ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA, 25(2), 31-38. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/eh.11549 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 27/12/2018 06:22:38 | ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA 25 (2016): 31-38 Received 15 March 2016 Accepted 12 December 2016 Available online 3 February 2017 A catalogue of Coleoptera specimens with potential forensic interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection MARIA DIMAKI1’*, MARIA ANAGNOU-VERONIKI2 AND JASON TYLIANAKIS3 1Goulandris Natural History Museum, 100 Othonos St. 14562 Kifissia, Greece 2Makariou 13, 15343 Aghia Paraskevi (Athens), Greece 3Zoology Department, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand ABSTRACT This paper presents a catalogue of the Coleoptera specimens in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection that have potential forensic interest. Forensic entomology can help to estimate the time elapsed since death by studying the necrophagous insects collected on a cadaver and its surroundings. In this paper forty eight species (369 specimens) are listed that belong to seven families: Silphidae (3 species), Staphylinidae (6 species), Histeridae (11 species), Anobiidae (4 species), Cleridae (6 species), Dermestidae (14 species), and Nitidulidae (4 species).
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan

    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan

    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
  • Forensic Importance of Edaphic Fauna After the Removal of a Corpse

    Forensic Importance of Edaphic Fauna After the Removal of a Corpse

    J Forensic Sci, 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01506.x CASE REPORT Available online at: interscience.wiley.com PATHOLOGY⁄BIOLOGY Marta I. SaloÇa,1 Ph.D.; M. Lourdes Moraza,2 Ph.D.; Miguel Carles-Tolr,3 Ph.D.; Victor Iraola,4 Ph.D.; Pablo Bahillo,5 Ph.D.; Toms Ylamos,6 Ph.D.; Raimundo Outerelo,7 Ph.D.; and Rafael Alcaraz,8 M.D. Searching the Soil: Forensic Importance of Edaphic Fauna After the Removal of a Corpse ABSTRACT: Arthropods at different stages of development collected from human remains in an advanced stage of decomposition (following autopsy) and from the soil at the scene are reported. The corpse was found in a mixed deciduous forest of Biscay (northern Spain). Soil fauna was extracted by sieving the soil where the corpse lay and placing the remains in Berlese–Tullgren funnels. Necrophagous fauna on the human remains was dominated by the fly Piophilidae: Stearibia nigriceps (Meigen, 1826), mites Ascidae: Proctolaelaps epuraeae (Hirschmann, 1963), Laelapidae: Hypoaspis (Gaeolaelaps) aculeifer (Canestrini, 1884), and the beetle Cleridae: Necrobia rufipes (de Geer, 1775). We confirm the importance of edaphic fauna, especially if the deceased is discovered in natural environs. Related fauna may remain for days after corpse removal and reveal infor- mation related to the circumstances of death. The species Nitidulidae: Omosita depressa (Linnaeus, 1758), Acaridae: Sancassania berlesei (Michael, 1903), Ascidae: Zerconopsis remiger (Kramer, 1876) and P. epuraeae, Urodinychidae: Uroobovella pulchella (Berlese, 1904), and Macrochelidae:
  • Rvk-Diss Digi

    Rvk-Diss Digi

    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) Associated to Cattle Dung in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

    Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) Associated to Cattle Dung in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

    October - December 2002 641 SCIENTIFIC NOTE Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) Associated to Cattle Dung in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil WILSON W. K OLLER1,2, ALBERTO GOMES1, SÉRGIO R. RODRIGUES3 AND JÚLIO MENDES 4 1Embrapa Gado de Corte, C. postal 154, CEP 79002-970, Campo Grande, MS 2 [email protected] 3Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul - UEMS, Aquidauana, MS 4Universidade Federal de Uberlândia - UFU, Uberlândia, MG Neotropical Entomology 31(4):641-645 (2002) Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) Associados a Fezes Bovinas em Campo Grande, MS RESUMO - Este trabalho foi executado com o objetivo de determinar as espécies locais de estafilinídeos fimícolas, devido à importância destes predadores e ou parasitóides no controle natural de parasitos de bovinos associadas às fezes. Para tanto, massas fecais com 1, 2 e 3 dias de idade foram coletadas semanalmente em uma pastagem de Brachiaria decumbens Stapf, no período de maio de 1990 a abril de 1992. As fezes foram acondicionadas em baldes plásticos, opacos, com capacidade para 15 litros, contendo aberturas lateral e no topo, onde foram fixados frascos para a captura, por um período de 40 dias, dos besouros estafilinídeos presentes nas massas fecais. Após este período a massa fecal e o solo existente nos baldes eram examinados e os insetos remanescentes recolhidos. Foi coletado um total de 13.215 exemplares, pertencendo a 34 espécies e/ou morfo espécies. Foram observados os seguintes doze gêneros: Oxytelus (3 espécies; 70,1%); Falagria (1 sp.; 7,9); Aleochara (4 sp.; 5,8); Philonthus (3 sp.; 5,1); Atheta (2 sp.; 4,0); Cilea (2 sp.; 1,2); Neohypnus (1 sp.; 0,7); Lithocharis (1 sp.; 0,7); Heterothops (2 sp.; 0,6); Somoleptus (1 sp.; 0,08); Dibelonetes (1 sp.; 0,06) e, Dysanellus (1 sp.; 0,04).
  • New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin

    New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 50 Numbers 1 & 2 -- Spring/Summer 2017 Article 2 Numbers 1 & 2 -- Spring/Summer 2017 September 2017 New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin Jordan D. Marché II [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Marché, Jordan D. II 2017. "New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 50 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol50/iss1/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Marché: New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin 6 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 50, Nos. 1–2 New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin Jordan D. Marché II 5415 Lost Woods Court, Oregon, WI 53575 Abstract Specimens of eleven different species of beetles (one of which is identified only to genus) have been collected from and are herein reported as new to Wisconsin. These spe- cies collectively occur within seven different families: Leiodidae, Latridiidae, Scirtidae, Throscidae, Corylophidae, Staphylinidae, and Dermestidae. A majority of the specimens were collected at the author’s residence, either in pan traps or at UV lights; the others were taken at two nearby (township) parks. Although Wisconsin’s coleopteran four antennomeres. Antennal grooves may be fauna is large and diverse, new findings con- found beside the eyes (Peck 2001).
  • Post-Mortem Interval Estimation Based on Insect Evidence in a Quasi

    Post-Mortem Interval Estimation Based on Insect Evidence in a Quasi

    Science & Justice 59 (2019) 109–115 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science & Justice journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scijus Case review Post-mortem interval estimation based on insect evidence in a quasi-indoor habitat T ⁎ Szymon Matuszewskia,b, , Anna Mądra-Bielewicza,b a Laboratory of Criminalistics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Święty Marcin 90, 61-809 Poznań, Poland b Wielkopolska Centre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89C, 61-614 Poznań, Poland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Insects collected on indoor cadavers are frequently used for post-mortem interval (PMI) estimation. Buildings Forensic entomology encountered during crime investigations vary according to temperatures inside, the extent of insect access re- Stearibia striction or sanitary conditions. This article reports the PMI oriented analyses of insect evidence sampled from Sarcophaga the human cadaver in the atypical indoor habitat. The body was found in the uninhabited house, on the floor Nasonia covered with rubbish, in the room with no doors and windows. Thermal conditions in the room were less Necrodes variable than in the local weather station, however still much more variable compared to the typical indoor Protophormia habitat, indicating the need for retrospective correction of temperature records from the station. Cadaver en- tomofauna was surprisingly diverse and abundant. We recorded several taxa usually not occurring on indoor cadavers, e.g. immature stages of Necrodes littoralis (Coleoptera: Silphidae) or Stearibia nigriceps (Diptera: Piophilidae). PMI was based on the age and the pre-appearance interval estimated for live puparium of S. nigriceps, giving the total interval of 37 ( ± 7.4) days plus 4–20 days resulting from the absence of first colonizing specimens of the species.
  • Zootaxa, Staphylinidae

    Zootaxa, Staphylinidae

    ZOOTAXA 1251 Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) of the Biologia Centrali-Americana: Current status of the names JOSÉ LUIS NAVARRETE-HEREDIA, CECILIA GÓMEZ-RODRÍGUEZ & ALFRED F. NEWTON Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand JOSÉ LUIS NAVARRETE-HEREDIA, CECILIA GÓMEZ-RODRÍGUEZ & ALFRED F. NEWTON Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) of the Biologia Centrali-Americana: Current status of the names (Zootaxa 1251) 70 pp.; 30 cm. 3 July 2006 ISBN 978-1-86977-016-7 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-017-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2006 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41383 Auckland 1030 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2006 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) Zootaxa 1251: 1–70 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1251 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) of the Biologia Centrali-Americana: Current status of the names JOSÉ LUIS NAVARRETE-HEREDIA1, CECILIA GÓMEZ-RODRÍGUEZ1 & ALFRED F. NEWTON2 1Centro de Estudios en Zoología, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Apdo. Postal 234, 45100, Zapopan, Jalisco, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Zoology Department, Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA.
  • Chaetotaxy and Larval Morphometry of Cercyon Praetextatus

    Chaetotaxy and Larval Morphometry of Cercyon Praetextatus

    74 (2): 177 – 193 10.10.2016 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2016. Chaetotaxy and larval morphometry of Cercyon prae- textatus (Say) and C. quisquilius (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Sphaeridiinae) and their phylogenetic implications Miguel Archangelsky Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Ecología y Sistemática Animal (LIESA), Centro de Investigaciones Esquel de Montaña y Estepa Patagónica (CIEMEP) (CONICET – UNPSJB), Roca 780, 9200 Esquel, Chubut, Argentina [[email protected]] Accepted 21.vii.2016. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 21.ix.2016. Editors in charge: Christian Schmidt & Klaus-Dieter Klass Abstract The primary and secondary chaetotaxy of the head capsule and head appendages of the three larval instars of Cercyon praetextatus (Say, 1825) and Cercyon quisquilius (Linnaeus, 1761) are described for the first time. Morphometric characters derived from the head capsule and mouthparts are also included, together with detailed illustrations of all characters. Morphology and chaetotaxy of these larvae is compared to that of Cercyon convexiusculus Stephens, 1829. Comparison of character states with other larvae of the tribes Megasternini, Coelostomatini, Protosternini and Shaeridiini confirms a well supported Megasternini, and a close relationship between Megasternini and Sphaeridiini. Key words Hydrophilidae, Sphaeridiinae, water scavenger beetles, larva, head, primary chaetotaxy, morphology, phylogeny. 1. Introduction The family Hydrophilidae is better known for its aquatic
  • Holocene Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction Based on Fossil Beetle Faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang Region, China

    Holocene Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction Based on Fossil Beetle Faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang Region, China

    Holocene palaeoenvironmental reconstruction based on fossil beetle faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang region, China Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London By Tianshu Zhang February 2018 Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London Declaration of Authorship I Tianshu Zhang hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 25/02/2018 1 Abstract This project presents the results of the analysis of fossil beetle assemblages extracted from 71 samples from two peat profiles from the Halashazi Wetland in the southern Altai region of northwest China. The fossil assemblages allowed the reconstruction of local environments of the early (10,424 to 9500 cal. yr BP) and middle Holocene (6374 to 4378 cal. yr BP). In total, 54 Coleoptera taxa representing 44 genera and 14 families have been found, and 37 species have been identified, including a new species, Helophorus sinoglacialis. The majority of the fossil beetle species identified are today part of the Siberian fauna, and indicate cold steppe or tundra ecosystems. Based on the biogeographic affinities of the fossil faunas, it appears that the Altai Mountains served as dispersal corridor for cold-adapted (northern) beetle species during the Holocene. Quantified temperature estimates were made using the Mutual Climate Range (MCR) method. In addition, indicator beetle species (cold adapted species and bark beetles) have helped to identify both cold and warm intervals, and moisture conditions have been estimated on the basis of water associated species.