DOCSLIB.ORG

Pollinator Communities and Plant-Pollinator Interactions in Fragmented Calcareous Grasslands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pollinator Communities and Plant-Pollinator Interactions in Fragmented Calcareous Grasslands Pollinator communities and plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented calcareous grasslands Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von Birgit Meyer geboren in Varel Göttingen, Juli 2007 D 7 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter 2. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Vidal Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 19.07.07 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: POLLINATORS IN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 Study region and study sites .......................................................................................... 3 Research objectives......................................................................................................... 6 Chapter outline ............................................................................................................... 6 Conclusions...................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2: IMPORTANCE OF LIFE HISTORY TRAITS FOR POLLINATOR LOSS IN FRAGMENTED CALCAROUS GRASSLANDS...........................................................................10 Abstract ..........................................................................................................................11 Introduction ...................................................................................................................11 Materials and methods..................................................................................................13 Study region............................................................................................................ 13 Habitat and landscape characteristics ..................................................................... 14 Pollinator sampling................................................................................................. 15 Statistical analyses.................................................................................................. 16 Results............................................................................................................................ 17 Habitat area and connectivity ................................................................................. 17 Resource availability .............................................................................................. 18 Effects of landscape matrix .................................................................................... 19 Body size ................................................................................................................ 19 Breeding strategies.................................................................................................. 20 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 21 Species-area relationship ........................................................................................ 21 Abundance-area relationship .................................................................................. 23 Effects of body size on species-area relationships ................................................. 23 Sociality .................................................................................................................. 24 Cleptoparasitic bees................................................................................................ 24 Connectivity............................................................................................................ 25 Landscape diversity ................................................................................................ 25 Resource availability .............................................................................................. 26 Conservation implications ...................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 3: CONTRASTING RESPONSES OF SPECIES RICHNESS AND DENSITY OF HOVERFLIES (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE) TO AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE CHANGE .................. 30 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 31 Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................................ 31 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 32 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 33 Study region and site characteristics....................................................................... 33 Pollinator sampling................................................................................................. 34 Statistical analyses.................................................................................................. 35 Results............................................................................................................................ 36 Size and quality of calcarous grasslands ................................................................ 36 Landscape diversity ................................................................................................ 38 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 39 Conclusions.................................................................................................................... 42 CHAPTER 4: LINKING FLOWER VISITATION, SEED SET, AND SEED PREDATION OF PRIMULA VERIS AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES ................................................................. 45 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 46 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 46 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 48 Study species .......................................................................................................... 48 Study region and study sites ................................................................................... 48 Flower visitation observation, pollen supplementation, and seed collection ......... 49 Statistical analyses.................................................................................................. 50 Results............................................................................................................................ 51 Pollinator abundance and diversity......................................................................... 51 Seed set and pollination limitation ......................................................................... 54 Seed predation ........................................................................................................ 55 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 55 Pollinator abundance and richness.......................................................................... 55 Seed set and pollination limitation ......................................................................... 57 Seed predation ........................................................................................................ 58 Spatial scales........................................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 5: PATCH AND LANDSCAPE EFFECTS ON POLLINATOR DIVERSITY AND SEED SET OF HIPPOCREPIS COMOSA IN AN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE ............................................... 61 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 62 Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................................ 62 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 63 Materials and methods................................................................................................. 65 Study species and its habitat................................................................................... 65 Study region and study design................................................................................ 65 Flower visitation observation ................................................................................. 66 Pollination experiments .......................................................................................... 67 Statistical analysis................................................................................................... 67 Results............................................................................................................................ 68 Effects of patch size, habitat area, and landscape diversity on flower visitors ...... 68 Pollination of Hippocrepis comosa ........................................................................ 70 Discussion .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of READING Delivering Biodiversity and Pollination Services on Farmland
    UNIVERSITY OF READING Delivering biodiversity and pollination services on farmland: a comparison of three wildlife- friendly farming schemes Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Agri-Environmental Research School of Agriculture, Policy and Development Chloe J. Hardman June 2016 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Chloe Hardman i Abstract Gains in food production through agricultural intensification have come at an environmental cost, including reductions in habitat diversity, species diversity and some ecosystem services. Wildlife- friendly farming schemes aim to mitigate the negative impacts of agricultural intensification. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of three schemes using four matched triplets of farms in southern England. The schemes were: i) a baseline of Entry Level Stewardship (ELS: a flexible widespread government scheme, ii) organic agriculture and iii) Conservation Grade (CG: a prescriptive, non-organic, biodiversity-focused scheme). We examined how effective the schemes were in supporting habitat diversity, species diversity, floral resources, pollinators and pollination services. Farms in CG and organic schemes supported higher habitat diversity than farms only in ELS. Plant and butterfly species richness were significantly higher on organic farms and butterfly species richness was marginally higher on CG farms compared to farms in ELS. The species richness of plants, butterflies, solitary bees and birds in winter was significantly correlated with local habitat diversity. Organic farms supported more evenly distributed floral resources and higher nectar densities compared to farms in CG or ELS. Compared to maximum estimates of pollen demand from six bee species, only organic farms supplied sufficient pollen in late summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Diet and Micro-Habitat Values for Wildlife and the Agronomic Potential of Selected Grassland Plant Species
    Report Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlifeand the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlife and the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A. Hopkins, A. Gundrey, R. Dunn & J. Tallowin Institute for Grassland and Environmental Research North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB J. Vickery & S. Gough British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Project officer Heather Robertson, Terrestrial Wildlife Team [email protected] Contractor(s) (where appropriate) S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly Newsletter No
    Dipterists Forum Hoverfly Newsletter Number 48 Spring 2010 ISSN 1358-5029 I am grateful to everyone who submitted articles and photographs for this issue in a timely manner. The closing date more or less coincided with the publication of the second volume of the new Swedish hoverfly book. Nigel Jones, who had already submitted his review of volume 1, rapidly provided a further one for the second volume. In order to avoid delay I have kept the reviews separate rather than attempting to merge them. Articles and illustrations (including colour images) for the next newsletter are always welcome. Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 49 (which is expected to be issued with the Autumn 2010 Dipterists Forum Bulletin) should be sent to me: David Iliff Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, (telephone 01242 674398), email:[email protected], to reach me by 20 May 2010. Please note the earlier than usual date which has been changed to fit in with the new bulletin closing dates. although we have not been able to attain the levels Hoverfly Recording Scheme reached in the 1980s. update December 2009 There have been a few notable changes as some of the old Stuart Ball guard such as Eileen Thorpe and Austin Brackenbury 255 Eastfield Road, Peterborough, PE1 4BH, [email protected] have reduced their activity and a number of newcomers Roger Morris have arrived. For example, there is now much more active 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire, PE9 1QE, recording in Shropshire (Nigel Jones), Northamptonshire [email protected] (John Showers), Worcestershire (Harry Green et al.) and This has been quite a remarkable year for a variety of Bedfordshire (John O’Sullivan).
    [Show full text]
  • Ipterists Digest
    ipterists Digest Dipterists’ Digest is a popular journal aimed primarily at field dipterists in the UK, Ireland and adjacent countries, with interests in recording, ecology, natural history, conservation and identification of British and NW European flies. Articles may be of any length up to 3000 words. Items exceeding this length may be serialised or printed in full, depending on the competition for space. They should be in clear concise English, preferably typed double spaced on one side of A4 paper. Only scientific names should be underlined- Tables should be on separate sheets. Figures drawn in clear black ink. about twice their printed size and lettered clearly. Enquiries about photographs and colour plates — please contact the Production Editor in advance as a charge may be made. References should follow the layout in this issue. Initially the scope of Dipterists' Digest will be:- — Observations of interesting behaviour, ecology, and natural history. — New and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.), — The conservation of flies and their habitats. — Provisional and interim reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including provisional and preliminary maps. — Records of new or scarce species for regions, counties, districts etc. — Local faunal accounts, field meeting results, and ‘holiday lists' with good ecological information/interpretation. — Notes on identification, additions, deletions and amendments to standard key works and checklists. — News of new publications/references/iiterature scan. Texts concerned with the Diptera of parts of continental Europe adjacent to the British Isles will also be considered for publication, if submitted in English. Dipterists Digest No.1 1988 E d ite d b y : Derek Whiteley Published by: Derek Whiteley - Sheffield - England for the Diptera Recording Scheme assisted by the Irish Wildlife Service ISSN 0953-7260 Printed by Higham Press Ltd., New Street, Shirland, Derby DE5 6BP s (0773) 832390.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly Newsletter 67
    Dipterists Forum Hoverfly Newsletter Number 67 Spring 2020 ISSN 1358-5029 . On 21 January 2020 I shall be attending a lecture at the University of Gloucester by Adam Hart entitled “The Insect Apocalypse” the subject of which will of course be one that matters to all of us. Spreading awareness of the jeopardy that insects are now facing can only be a good thing, as is the excellent number of articles that, despite this situation, readers have submitted for inclusion in this newsletter. The editorial of Hoverfly Newsletter No. 66 covered two subjects that are followed up in the current issue. One of these was the diminishing UK participation in the international Syrphidae symposia in recent years, but I am pleased to say that Jon Heal, who attended the most recent one, has addressed this matter below. Also the publication of two new illustrated hoverfly guides, from the Netherlands and Canada, were announced. Both are reviewed by Roger Morris in this newsletter. The Dutch book has already proved its value in my local area, by providing the confirmation that we now have Xanthogramma stackelbergi in Gloucestershire (taken at Pope’s Hill in June by John Phillips). Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 68 (which is expected to be issued with the Autumn 2020 Dipterists Forum Bulletin) should be sent to me: David Iliff, Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, (telephone 01242 674398), email:[email protected], to reach me by 20 June 2020. The hoverfly illustrated at the top right of this page is a male Leucozona laternaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Preserving Threatened Grassland Species and Habitats
    Towards preserving threatened grassland plant species and habitats - seed longevity, seed viability and phylogeography Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Fakultät für Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von SIMONE B. TAUSCH aus Burghausen im Jahr 2017 II Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 15.12.2017 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Peter Poschlod Regensburg, den 14.12.2017 Simone B. Tausch III IV Table of contents Chapter 1 General introduction 6 Chapter 2 Towards the origin of Central European grasslands: glacial and postgla- 12 cial history of the Salad Burnet (Sanguisorba minor Scop.) Chapter 3 A habitat-scale study of seed lifespan in artificial conditions 28 examining seed traits Chapter 4 Seed survival in the soil and at artificial storage: Implications for the 42 conservation of calcareous grassland species Chapter 5 How precise can X-ray predict the viability of wild flowering plant seeds? 56 Chapter 6 Seed dispersal in space and time - origin and conservation of calcareous 66 grasslands Summary 70 Zusammenfassung 72 References 74 Danksagung 89 DECLARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS Chapter 2 was published with the thesis’ author as main author: Tausch, S., Leipold, M., Poschlod, P. and Reisch, C. (2017). Molecular markers provide evidence for a broad-fronted recolonisation of the widespread calcareous grassland species Sanguisorba minor from southern and cryptic northern refugia. Plant Biology, 19: 562–570. doi:10.1111/plb.12570. V CHAPTER 1 General introduction THREATENED AND ENDANGERED persal ability (von Blanckenhagen & Poschlod, 2005). But in general, soils of calcareous grasslands exhibit HABITATS low ability to buffer species extinctions by serving as donor (Thompson et al., 1997; Bekker et al., 1998a; Regarding the situation of Europe’s plant species in- Kalamees & Zobel, 1998; Poschlod et al., 1998; Stöck- ventory, Central Europe represents the centre of en- lin & Fischer, 1999; Karlik & Poschlod, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control and Pollination in Cider Apple Orchards: a Socio-Ecological
    Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas Programa de Doctorado: “Biogeociencias” Línea de investigación: Ecología y Biodiversidad Biological Control and Pollination in Cider Apple Orchards: a Socio-ecological Approach A thesis submitted by Rodrigo Martínez Sastre Under the supervision of Dr. Marcos Miñarro and Dr. Daniel García Oviedo 2020 RECOMMENDED CITATION: Martínez-Sastre, R. (2020). Biological control and pollination in cider apple orchards: a socio-ecological approach. PhD Thesis. University of Oviedo (Oviedo, Asturias). Spain RESUMEN DEL CONTENIDO DE TESIS DOCTORAL 1.- Título de la Tesis Español/Otro Idioma: Control biológico y Inglés: Biological control and pollination in polinización en plantaciones de manzana de cider-apple orchards: a socio-ecological sidra: una aproximación socio-ecológica approach. 2.- Autor Nombre: RODRIGO MARTÍNEZ SASTRE DNI/Pasaporte/NIE: 53474767C Programa de Doctorado: BIOGEOCIENCIAS Órgano responsable: DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGÍA DE ORGANISMOS Y SISTEMAS RESUMEN (en español) La expansión agrícola y su intensificación son unas de las principales causas del deterioro medio ambiental y de la pérdida de biodiversidad en todo el mundo. Aunque suene contradictorio, esta tendencia actual pone en peligro el suministro futuro de alimentos a escala global. Sin embargo, una agricultura rentable que haga compatible la seguridad alimentaria con la conservación de la naturaleza es posible. En 010 (Reg.2018) 010 - los últimos años, muchos esfuerzos se han destinado a detener los daños generados por la agricultura y hacerla más sostenible. Lamentablemente, queda mucho camino por recorrer. La biodiversidad, asociada VOA - al suministro de servicios ecosistémicos, puede aportar diversos beneficios al rendimiento de los cultivos. MAT - Sin embargo, para asentar dicha biodiversidad es necesario cumplir ciertas condiciones favorables dentro FOR y cerca del cultivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverflies Family: Syrphidae
    Birmingham & Black Country SPECIES ATLAS SERIES Hoverflies Family: Syrphidae Andy Slater Produced by EcoRecord Introduction Hoverflies are members of the Syrphidae family in the very large insect order Diptera ('true flies'). There are around 283 species of hoverfly found in the British Isles, and 176 of these have been recorded in Birmingham and the Black Country. This atlas contains tetrad maps of all of the species recorded in our area based on records held on the EcoRecord database. The records cover the period up to the end of 2019. Myathropa florea Cover image: Chrysotoxum festivum All illustrations and photos by Andy Slater All maps contain Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database right 2020 Hoverflies Hoverflies are amongst the most colourful and charismatic insects that you might spot in your garden. They truly can be considered the gardener’s fiend as not only are they important pollinators but the larva of many species also help to control aphids! Great places to spot hoverflies are in flowery meadows on flowers such as knapweed, buttercup, hogweed or yarrow or in gardens on plants such as Canadian goldenrod, hebe or buddleia. Quite a few species are instantly recognisable while the appearance of some other species might make you doubt that it is even a hoverfly… Mimicry Many hoverfly species are excellent mimics of bees and wasps, imitating not only their colouring, but also often their shape and behaviour. Sometimes they do this to fool the bees and wasps so they can enter their nests to lay their eggs. Most species however are probably trying to fool potential predators into thinking that they are a hazardous species with a sting or foul taste, even though they are in fact harmless and perfectly edible.
    [Show full text]
  • Aculeate Bee and Wasp Survey Report 2015/16 for the Knepp Wildland Project
    Aculeate bee and wasp survey report 2015/16 for the Knepp Wildland Project Thomas Wood and Dave Goulson School of Life Sciences, The University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QG Methodology Aculeate bees and wasps were surveyed on the Knepp Castle Estate as part of their biodiversity monitoring programme during the 2015/2016 seasons. The southern block, comprising 473 hectares, was selected for the survey as it is the most extensively rewilded section of the estate. Nine areas were identified in the southern block and each one was surveyed by free searching for 20 minutes on each visit. Surveys were conducted on April 13th, June 3rd and June 30th in 2015 and May 20th, June 24th, July 20th, August 7th and August 12th in 2016. Survey results and species of note A total of 62 species of bee and 30 species of wasp were recorded during the survey. This total includes seven bee and four wasp species of national conservation importance (Table 1, Table 2). Rarity classifications come from Falk (1991) but have been modified by TW to take account of the major shifts in abundance that have occurred since the publication of this review. The important bee species were Andrena labiata, Ceratina cyanea, Lasioglossum puncticolle, Macropis europaea, Melitta leporina, Melitta tricincta and Sphecodes scabricollis. Both A. labiata and C. cyanea show no particular affinity for clay. Both forage from a wide variety of plants and are considered scarce nationally for historical reasons and for their restricted southern distribution. M. leporina and M. tricincta are both oligolectic bees, collecting pollen from one botanical family only.
    [Show full text]