Liverwort Reproductive Structures – Demystifying the Jargon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liverwort Reproductive Structures – Demystifying the Jargon Beginner’sCorner Beginner’s corner found in the axil of a modified leaf (bract). The archegonium is flask-shaped with a long neck and Capsule Liverwort swollen base which contains an egg cell. Between species, the appearance of the individual sexual Seta organs does not differ much. LEAFY LIVERWORTS reproductive structures – Perianth When fertile, most British leafy liverworts develop a perianth, a tube-like structure formed by the fusion of a few leaves that surrounds and protects Female (perichaetial) demystifying the jargon the developing capsule. Perianths are typically bract longer-lived and more distinctive than the capsules themselves, which may take up to a year to develop. Size, shape and other characters vary between nderstanding the terms used to In this edition of Beginner’s Corner Sharon species and can be important diagnostic features. describe liverwort structures and For example, the characteristic ‘star-like’ perianths Pilkington turns her attention to the Leafy shoot knowing what they look like and of the Lejeuneaceae are produced by folds in the where to find them is fundamental confusing and difficult subject of liverwort perianth. to identification. Many bryological reproductive structures that are often so Further protection is usually afforded by bracts. Uterms are equally applicable to mosses, liverworts Put simply, a bract is a modified leaf protecting the vital for correct identification. and hornworts, but in the reproductive organs antheridium or archegonium. Perichaetial bracts important differences are apparent. Unlike the are found below the perianth and, in certain genera, mosses, capsule and seta characters are rarely such as Jungermannia and Solenostoma, a short used for identification of liverworts, but associated fleshy tube called a perigynium may also develop reproductive structures are important and have their below the female bracts and/or perianth. Archegonium own names. In this article I shall try to demystify Locating male inflorescences can often be the n Perianth and other structures (Scapania). S. Pilkington some of the terms used in current accounts of key to determining if a liverwort is dioicous (separate the British liverwort flora, including Paton (1999) male and female plants) or monoicous, with male self-fertilization, antheridia and archegonia mature and Smith (1990). For superb photographs and and female sexual organs borne on the same plant. at different times in some monoicous species, and illustrations I would strongly recommend Malcolm Many monoicous leafy liverworts are autoicous, thus individual plants may appear to be dioicous at & Malcolm (2006). bearing spatially distinct male and female branches certain times of year. With the exception of the large Like mosses, liverworts reproduce sexually on the same plant, but some species are paroicous, thalloid liverworts in the Marchantiaceae family, through the production of male and female sexual where the antheridia are hidden in the axils of antheridia and archegonia are usually immersed in organs often associated with specialized leaves male (perigonial) bracts just below the female the thallus. After fertilization, the capsule starts to (bracts) in what is termed an inflorescence on the inflorescence. Unlike mosses, liverworts are rarely develop and is protected by an involucre, a tube green parts of the shoot or thallus (gametophyte). synoicous, where archegonia and antheridia are serving the same function as the perianth in leafy The male inflorescence is known as a perigonium; Antheridium mixed in the same inflorescence. However, closer liverworts. Characters such as the presence of teeth the female is the perichaetium. The antheridium inspection will always reveal the differences. at the mouth of the involucre are sometimes used in (male organ) produces sperm cells which fertilize the identification. When mature, the capsule is usually archegonium (female organ), prompting develop- THALLOID LIVERWORTS raised by the seta above the thallus, although in ment of the sporophyte (the capsule, seta and It is normally relatively straightforward to tell if a ephemeral genera, e.g. Riccia, the capsules may associated structures). The antheridium looks like a n A generalized antheridium and archegonium. thalloid liverwort has reproductive structures and remain totally immersed in the thallus until spores small ovoid pouch with a short stalk and is normally S. Pilkington if it is dioicous or monoicous. However, to avoid are released through disintegration of thallus tissue. 44 FieldBryology No108 | Nov12 FieldBryology No108 | Nov12 45 Beginner’sCorner Beginner’s corner found in the axil of a modified leaf (bract). The archegonium is flask-shaped with a long neck and Capsule Liverwort swollen base which contains an egg cell. Between species, the appearance of the individual sexual Seta organs does not differ much. LEAFY LIVERWORTS reproductive structures – Perianth When fertile, most British leafy liverworts develop a perianth, a tube-like structure formed by the fusion of a few leaves that surrounds and protects Female (perichaetial) demystifying the jargon the developing capsule. Perianths are typically bract longer-lived and more distinctive than the capsules themselves, which may take up to a year to develop. Size, shape and other characters vary between nderstanding the terms used to In this edition of Beginner’s Corner Sharon species and can be important diagnostic features. describe liverwort structures and For example, the characteristic ‘star-like’ perianths Pilkington turns her attention to the Leafy shoot knowing what they look like and of the Lejeuneaceae are produced by folds in the where to find them is fundamental confusing and difficult subject of liverwort perianth. to identification. Many bryological reproductive structures that are often so Further protection is usually afforded by bracts. Uterms are equally applicable to mosses, liverworts Put simply, a bract is a modified leaf protecting the vital for correct identification. and hornworts, but in the reproductive organs antheridium or archegonium. Perichaetial bracts important differences are apparent. Unlike the are found below the perianth and, in certain genera, mosses, capsule and seta characters are rarely such as Jungermannia and Solenostoma, a short used for identification of liverworts, but associated fleshy tube called a perigynium may also develop reproductive structures are important and have their below the female bracts and/or perianth. Archegonium own names. In this article I shall try to demystify Locating male inflorescences can often be the n Perianth and other structures (Scapania). S. Pilkington some of the terms used in current accounts of key to determining if a liverwort is dioicous (separate the British liverwort flora, including Paton (1999) male and female plants) or monoicous, with male self-fertilization, antheridia and archegonia mature and Smith (1990). For superb photographs and and female sexual organs borne on the same plant. at different times in some monoicous species, and illustrations I would strongly recommend Malcolm Many monoicous leafy liverworts are autoicous, thus individual plants may appear to be dioicous at & Malcolm (2006). bearing spatially distinct male and female branches certain times of year. With the exception of the large Like mosses, liverworts reproduce sexually on the same plant, but some species are paroicous, thalloid liverworts in the Marchantiaceae family, through the production of male and female sexual where the antheridia are hidden in the axils of antheridia and archegonia are usually immersed in organs often associated with specialized leaves male (perigonial) bracts just below the female the thallus. After fertilization, the capsule starts to (bracts) in what is termed an inflorescence on the inflorescence. Unlike mosses, liverworts are rarely develop and is protected by an involucre, a tube green parts of the shoot or thallus (gametophyte). synoicous, where archegonia and antheridia are serving the same function as the perianth in leafy The male inflorescence is known as a perigonium; Antheridium mixed in the same inflorescence. However, closer liverworts. Characters such as the presence of teeth the female is the perichaetium. The antheridium inspection will always reveal the differences. at the mouth of the involucre are sometimes used in (male organ) produces sperm cells which fertilize the identification. When mature, the capsule is usually archegonium (female organ), prompting develop- THALLOID LIVERWORTS raised by the seta above the thallus, although in ment of the sporophyte (the capsule, seta and It is normally relatively straightforward to tell if a ephemeral genera, e.g. Riccia, the capsules may associated structures). The antheridium looks like a n A generalized antheridium and archegonium. thalloid liverwort has reproductive structures and remain totally immersed in the thallus until spores small ovoid pouch with a short stalk and is normally S. Pilkington if it is dioicous or monoicous. However, to avoid are released through disintegration of thallus tissue. 44 FieldBryology No108 | Nov12 FieldBryology No108 | Nov12 45 Beginner’s corner Beginner’s corner Male plant Female plant In Pellia epiphylla (a monoicous liverwort), the also refer to perianths in thalloid liverworts so the archegonia (and ultimately the capsules) are borne structural distinction can seem unclear. towards the apex of a main thallus, with many Many thalloid liverworts also reproduce asexually Perianth
Recommended publications
  • Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae
    Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae. Chapt. 1-11. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 1-11-1 Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-11: AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER METZGERIALES: ANEURACEAE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCLASS METZGERIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Order Metzgeriales............................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneuraceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura maxima ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-11-2 Aneura mirabilis .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-7 Aneura pinguis ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hepaticae, Metzgeriales)
    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2010, 31 (3): 207-215 ©2010 Adac. Tous droits réservés Fast identification method for an allopolyploid liverwort Pellia borealis Lorbeer (Hepaticae, Metzgeriales) Ewa CHUDZI◊SKA*&Ireneusz J. ODRZYKOSKI Department of Genetics, Institute of Experimental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Pozna¬,Poland (Received 13 February 2009, accepted 22 March 2010) Abstract –Asimple method was described for the identification of an allopolyploid liverwort Pellia borealis based on isozyme analysis. Aperfect correlation was observed between the polyploid chromosome number (n=18) and the fixed heterozygous isoenzyme pattern of two diaphorase loci (DiaA and DiaC) in alarge collection of Pellia epiphylla sensu lato from Polish populations. Therefore, their isozyme pattern may be used as a reliable diagnostic marker, which makes it possible to distinguish between apolyploid and two parental cryptic species from the P. epiphylla complex. Due to the alloploid origin of P. borealis we postulate that the species rank of the taxon should be maintained and geographical distribution revised. Isozyme markers /chromosome number /allopolyploidy / Pellia borealis /Pellia epiphylla complex INTRODUCTION Liverworts from genus Pellia the Epiphyllae section (Schust.) occurs in North America, Europe and Asia (de Sloover &Messe, 1982; Newton, 1986a; Szweykowski et al., 1995; Odrzykoski et al., 1996). Recent studies on genetic variability of this section have provided new evidence supporting ahypothesis of allopolyploid origins of Pellia borealis Lorbeer as aspecies originated by hybridization between two cryptic species from the Pellia epiphylla (L.) Corda complex and subsequent polyploidization (Odrzykoski et al.,1996; Chudzi¬ska et al., 2005; Fiedorow et al.,2001; Pacak &Szweykowska-Kuli¬ska, 2000, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • BRYOPHYTES .Pdf
    Diversity of Microbes and Cryptogams Bryophyta Geeta Asthana Department of Botany, University of Lucknow, Lucknow – 226007 India Date of submission: May 11, 2006 Version: English Significant Key words: Bryophyta, Hepaticopsida (Liverworts), Anthocerotopsida (Hornworts), , Bryopsida (Mosses). 1 Contents 1. Introduction • Definition & Systematic Position in the Plant Kingdom • Alternation of Generation • Life-cycle Pattern • Affinities with Algae and Pteridophytes • General Characters 2. Classification 3. Class – Hepaticopsida • General characters • Classification o Order – Calobryales o Order – Jungermanniales – Frullania o Order – Metzgeriales – Pellia o Order – Monocleales o Order – Sphaerocarpales o Order – Marchantiales – Marchantia 4. Class – Anthocerotopsida • General Characters • Classification o Order – Anthocerotales – Anthoceros 5. Class – Bryopsida • General Characters • Classification o Order – Sphagnales – Sphagnum o Order – Andreaeales – Andreaea o Order – Takakiales – Takakia o Order – Polytrichales – Pogonatum, Polytrichum o Order – Buxbaumiales – Buxbaumia o Order – Bryales – Funaria 6. References 2 Introduction Bryophytes are “Avascular Archegoniate Cryptogams” which constitute a large group of highly diversified plants. Systematic position in the plant kingdom The plant kingdom has been classified variously from time to time. The early systems of classification were mostly artificial in which the plants were grouped for the sake of convenience based on (observable) evident characters. Carolus Linnaeus (1753) classified
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Male And
    Planta (2020) 252:21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03424-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE The identifcation of diferentially expressed genes in male and female gametophytes of simple thalloid liverwort Pellia endiviifolia sp. B using an RNA‑seq approach Izabela Sierocka1 · Sylwia Alaba2 · Artur Jarmolowski1 · Wojciech M. Karlowski2 · Zofa Szweykowska‑Kulinska1 Received: 14 January 2020 / Accepted: 8 July 2020 / Published online: 15 July 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Main conclusion This study shows diferences in gene expression between male and female gametophytes of the simple thalloid liverwort with a distinction between the vegetative and reproductive phases of growth. Abstract Pellia endiviifolia is a simple thalloid liverwort that, together with hornworts and mosses, represents the oldest living land plants. The limited taxon sampling for genomic and functional studies hampers our understanding of processes governing evolution of these plants. RNA sequencing represents an attractive way to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of non-model species development. In the present study, RNA-seq was used to profle the diferences in gene expression between P. endiviifolia male and female gametophytes, with a distinction between the vegetative and reproductive phases of growth. By comparison of the gene expression profles from individuals producing sex organs with the remaining thalli types, we have determined a set of genes whose expression might be important for the development of P. endiviifolia reproductive organs. The selected diferentially expressed genes (DEGs) were categorized into fve main pathways: metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes, and organismal systems. A comparison of the obtained data with the Marchantia polymorpha transcriptome resulted in the identifcation of genes exhibiting a simi- lar expression pattern during the reproductive phase of growth between members of the two distinct liverwort classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryophyta - Jean Broutin
    PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF LIFE – Embryophyta - Jean Broutin EMBRYOPHYTA Jean Broutin UMR 7207, CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, Paris Keywords: Embryophyta, phylogeny, classification, morphology, green plants, land plants, lineages, diversification, life history, Bryophyta, Tracheophyta, Spermatophyta, gymnosperms, angiosperms. Contents 1. Introduction to land plants 2. Embryophytes. Characteristics and diversity 2.1. Human Use of Embryophytes 2.2. Importance of the Embryophytes in the History of Life 2.3. Phylogenetic Emergence of the Embryophytes: The “Streptophytes” Concept 2.4. Evolutionary Origin of the Embryophytes: The Phyletic Lineages within the Embryophytes 2.5. Invasion of Land and Air by the Embryophytes: A Complex Evolutionary Success 2.6. Hypotheses about the First Appearance of Embryophytes, the Fossil Data 3. Bryophytes 3.1. Division Marchantiophyta (liverworts) 3.2. Division Anthocerotophyta (hornworts) 3.3. Division Bryophyta (mosses) 4. Tracheophytes (vascular plants) 4.1. The “Polysporangiophyte Concept” and the Tracheophytes 4.2. Tracheophyta (“true” Vascular Plants) 4.3. Eutracheophyta 4.3.1. Seedless Vascular Plants 4.3.1.1. Rhyniophyta (Extinct Group) 4.3.1.2. Lycophyta 4.3.1.3. Euphyllophyta 4.3.1.4. Monilophyta 4.3.1.5. Eusporangiate Ferns 4.3.1.6. Psilotales 4.3.1.7. Ophioglossales 4.3.1.8. Marattiales 4.3.1.9. Equisetales 4.3.1.10. Leptosporangiate Ferns 4.3.1.11. Polypodiales 4.3.1.12. Cyatheales 4.3.1.13. Salviniales 4.3.1.14. Osmundales 4.3.1.15. Schizaeales, Gleicheniales, Hymenophyllales. 5. Progymnosperm concept: the “emblematic” fossil plant Archaeopteris. 6. Seed plants 6.1. Spermatophyta 6.1.1. Gymnosperms ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF LIFE – Embryophyta - Jean Broutin 6.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryo-Activities: a Review on How Bryophytes Are Contributing to the Arsenal of Natural Bioactive Compounds Against Fungi
    plants Review Bryo-Activities: A Review on How Bryophytes Are Contributing to the Arsenal of Natural Bioactive Compounds against Fungi Mauro Commisso 1,† , Francesco Guarino 2,† , Laura Marchi 3,†, Antonella Muto 4,†, Amalia Piro 5,† and Francesca Degola 6,*,† 1 Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Cà Vignal 1, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona (VR), Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemistry and Biology, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Medicine and Surgery, Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43125 Parma (PR), Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Calabria, Via Ponte P. Bucci 6b, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza (CS), Italy; [email protected] 5 Laboratory of Plant Biology and Plant Proteomics (Lab.Bio.Pro.Ve), Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technologies, University of Calabria, Ponte P. Bucci 12 C, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza (CS), Italy; [email protected] 6 Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco delle Scienze 11/A, 43124 Parma (PR), Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] † All authors equally contributed to the manuscript. Abstract: Usually regarded as less evolved than their more recently diverged vascular sisters, which currently dominate vegetation landscape, bryophytes seem having nothing to envy to the defensive arsenal of other plants, since they had acquired a suite of chemical traits that allowed them to Citation: Commisso, M.; Guarino, F.; adapt and persist on land. In fact, these closest modern relatives of the ancestors to the earliest Marchi, L.; Muto, A.; Piro, A.; Degola, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Aneura Maxima (Schiffn.) Steph. New to Norway
    Aneura maxima new to Norway 1 Aneura maxima (Schiffn.) Steph. new to Norway Jan-Peter Frahm Aneura maxima is a species which was described from Java and reported from various parts of Asia (India, Indonesia, New Caledonia and Japan). It was recently found new to Thailand (Frahm et al. 2009). Schuster (1992) reported this species from the Appalachian Mountains in North America and Andriesen et al. (1995) for the first time for Europe from the Belgian Ardennes. I (Frahm 1997) reported the species a second time for Europe from Finland. Subsequently, the species was reported from many other regions of Europe including Denmark (Thingsgaard 2002), Poland and Luxemburg (Werner 2003), Corsica (Ros et al. 2007), France (Sotiaux et al. 1996), Czechia (Kucera 2004) and Germany (Meinunger & Schröder (2007). In Scandinavia, the species is known only from Finland and Denmark (Damsholt 2002). Recently this species was found also in Norway: Hordaland: Tysnes, Reksteren, west coast N Sunde, swampy place in a small ravine leading to the sea, ca. 3 m alt., Frahm 31.8.2011 no. 2011662. (fig. 1-5) Aneura maxima is easily recognized by the thallus margins which are undulate and unistratose in - several rows. In other respects it looks more like Pellia epiphylla (a synonym of A. maxima in Japan is A. pellioides Horik.) and can be distinguished from the latter by unicellular slime hairs at the thallus apices, whereas Pellia has multicellular slime hairs (Schuster 1992, Damsholt 2002). Confusingly, Aneura maxima has even some kind of midrib like Pellia and unlike Aneura pinguis (Damsholt 2002), see also fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Marchantiophyta
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Marchantiophyta. Chapt. 2-3. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Ebook 2-3-1 sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 9 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 2-3 MARCHANTIOPHYTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Distinguishing Marchantiophyta ......................................................................................................................... 2-3-2 Elaters .......................................................................................................................................................... 2-3-3 Leafy or Thallose? ....................................................................................................................................... 2-3-5 Class Marchantiopsida ........................................................................................................................................ 2-3-5 Thallus Construction .................................................................................................................................... 2-3-5 Sexual Structures ......................................................................................................................................... 2-3-6 Sperm Dispersal ........................................................................................................................................... 2-3-8 Class Jungermanniopsida .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist and Country Status of European Bryophytes – Towards a New Red List for Europe
    ISSN 1393 – 6670 Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – towards a new Red List for Europe Cover image, outlined in Department Green Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 84 Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – towards a new Red List for Europe N.G. Hodgetts Citation: Hodgetts, N.G. (2015) Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – towards a new Red List for Europe. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 84. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Keywords: Bryophytes, mosses, liverworts, checklist, threat status, Red List, Europe, ECCB, IUCN Swedish Speices Information Centre Cover photograph: Hepatic mat bryophytes, Mayo, Ireland © Neil Lockhart The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & R. Jeffrey © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2015 Contents (this will automatically update) PrefaceContents ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 ExecutivePreface ................................ Summary ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction 3 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Miniature World in Decline: European Red List of Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts
    A miniature world in decline European Red List of Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts Nick Hodgetts, Marta Cálix, Eve Englefield, Nicholas Fettes, Mariana García Criado, Lea Patin, Ana Nieto, Ariel Bergamini, Irene Bisang, Elvira Baisheva, Patrizia Campisi, Annalena Cogoni, Tomas Hallingbäck, Nadya Konstantinova, Neil Lockhart, Marko Sabovljevic, Norbert Schnyder, Christian Schröck, Cecilia Sérgio, Manuela Sim Sim, Jan Vrba, Catarina C. Ferreira, Olga Afonina, Tom Blockeel, Hans Blom, Steffen Caspari, Rosalina Gabriel, César Garcia, Ricardo Garilleti, Juana González Mancebo, Irina Goldberg, Lars Hedenäs, David Holyoak, Vincent Hugonnot, Sanna Huttunen, Mikhail Ignatov, Elena Ignatova, Marta Infante, Riikka Juutinen, Thomas Kiebacher, Heribert Köckinger, Jan Kučera, Niklas Lönnell, Michael Lüth, Anabela Martins, Oleg Maslovsky, Beáta Papp, Ron Porley, Gordon Rothero, Lars Söderström, Sorin Ştefǎnuţ, Kimmo Syrjänen, Alain Untereiner, Jiri Váňa Ɨ, Alain Vanderpoorten, Kai Vellak, Michele Aleffi, Jeff Bates, Neil Bell, Monserrat Brugués, Nils Cronberg, Jo Denyer, Jeff Duckett, H.J. During, Johannes Enroth, Vladimir Fedosov, Kjell-Ivar Flatberg, Anna Ganeva, Piotr Gorski, Urban Gunnarsson, Kristian Hassel, Helena Hespanhol, Mark Hill, Rory Hodd, Kristofer Hylander, Nele Ingerpuu, Sanna Laaka-Lindberg, Francisco Lara, Vicente Mazimpaka, Anna Mežaka, Frank Müller, Jose David Orgaz, Jairo Patiño, Sharon Pilkington, Felisa Puche, Rosa M. Ros, Fred Rumsey, J.G. Segarra-Moragues, Ana Seneca, Adam Stebel, Risto Virtanen, Henrik Weibull, Jo Wilbraham and Jan Żarnowiec About IUCN Created in 1948, IUCN has evolved into the world’s largest and most diverse environmental network. It harnesses the experience, resources and reach of its more than 1,300 Member organisations and the input of over 10,000 experts. IUCN is the global authority on the status of the natural world and the measures needed to safeguard it.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for Auricled Twayblade (Listera Auriculata)
    Conservation Assessment for Auricled Twayblade (Listera auriculata) Photo: Wisconsin Herbarium USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 2001 Prepared by: Joann Hoy 21 Steam Mill Road Auburn, NH 03032 for: New England Wild Flower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701-2699 508/877-7630 e-mail: [email protected] • website: www.newfs.org This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Auricled Twayblade (Listera auriculata) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES.............................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Guide to British Upland Vegetation
    Cover illustrations: Beinn Eighe, with alpine bearberry Arctostaphylos alpinus in the foreground (front cover); a mosaic of burnt heather Calluna vulgaris and bracken Pteridium aquilinum in the Lammermuir Hills (back cover). (Photos: Laurie Campbell) An illustrated guide to British upland vegetation A M Averis and A B G Averis Haddington, East Lothian HJBBirks Botanical Institute, University of Bergen D Horsfield and D B A Thompson Advisory Services, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh MJMYeo Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough Pelagic Publishing PO Box 725 Exeter EX1 9QU UK An illustrated guide to British upland vegetation © JNCC 2004 This reprint edition published by Pelagic Publishing 2014 www.pelagicpublishing.com ISBN-13: 978-1-78427-015-5 This book is a reprint edition of ISBN-10: 1-86107-553-7 published by JNCC. Contents List of colour plates 9 Preface 11 Acknowledgments 13 Introduction 15 Key to upland vegetation types 57 Accounts of vegetation types 94 W3 Salix pentandra-Carex rostrata woodland 95 W4 Betula pubescens-Molinia caerulea woodland 98 W7 Alnus glutinosa-Fraxinus excelsior-Lysimachia nemorum woodland 101 W9 Fraxinus excelsior-Sorbus aucuparia-Mercurialis perennis woodland 104 W11 Quercus petraea-Betula pubescens-Oxalis acetosella woodland 107 W17 Quercus petraea-Betula pubescens-Dicranum majus woodland 111 W18 Pinus sylvestris-Hylocomium splendens woodland 115 W19 Juniperus communis ssp. communis-Oxalis acetosella woodland 119 W20 Salix lapponum-Luzula sylvatica scrub 122 W23 Ulex europaeus-Rubus fruticosus
    [Show full text]