DOCSLIB.ORG

Giving USA 2019 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Giving USA 2019 The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2018 Researched and written by IUPUI LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY Giving USA FoundationTM thanks our Platinum Supporters and Giving Institute Members, CCS Fundraising and DonorPerfect, for their generous contributions to this year’s report. We are grateful for the generous gifts to Giving USA Foundation for Giving USA and wish to recognize the substantial support from the following contributors. Platinum ($25,000+) Patron ($10,000-$24,999) * * Contribution includes an amount for in-kind services (continued on next page) Benefactor ($5,000-$9,999) * * Contribution includes an amount for in-kind services Partner ($2,500-$4,999) Alexander Haas Cramer & Associates Alexander Macnab & Co. Dini Spheris Aly Sterling Philanthropy DonorSearch Beazley Foundation, Inc. Johnson, Grossnickle + Associates Benefactor Group Richner + Richner Byrne Pelofsky + Associates LLC Ruotolo Associates Inc. Community Brands* * Contribution includes an amount for in-kind services Builder ($1,000-$2,499) Advancement Resources Joyaux Associates Association for Healthcare Philanthropy Kellogg Organization, Inc Association of Fundraising Professionals Maree G. Bullock in recognition of Benevon Jimmie R. Alford boodleAI Margaret and Tom Mesaros Carlson Fund Raising, LLC Nancy L. Rabin Christopher Looney The Lapin Group, LLC Grants Plus The Yunker Group, Inc. iWave Giving USA™ 2019 THE ANNUAL REPORT ON PHILANTHROPY FOR THE YEAR 2018 64TH ANNUAL ISSUE Researched and written at Publisher Giving USA is a public outreach initiative of Giving USA Foundation. The Foundation, established in 1985 by what is now The Giving Institute, endeavors to advance philanthropy through research and education. Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2018 is a 2019 copyright of Giving USA Foundation and is researched and written at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. All rights are reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, whether in print or electronic form, without the written permission of Giving USA Foundation. Permission to reprint excerpts may be obtained by writing to the Foundation. Go to www.givingusa.org for more information about permission requests. For media inquiries at Giving USA Foundation, please contact Public Communications Inc. at 312.558.1770 or [email protected]. For media inquiries at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, please contact Adriene Davis Kalugyer, 317.278.8972 or [email protected]. For research and other types of inquiries, please contact Giving USA Foundation at info@givingusa. org or call 312.981.6794. Citation of this report must use the following text regardless of scholarly style: Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2018 (2019). Chicago: Giving USA Foundation. Speakers may cite Giving USA. Use of Giving USA’s data or other material in presentations, texts, online format, or other contexts must credit Giving USA as noted in the above sections in a prominent fashion. Stock photos © 2019 by Getty Images. Contents Acknowledgments ....................................................................................... 8 Foreword .................................................................................................... 13 What Giving USA Can Do For You ............................................................. 17 Infographic: Total Estimated 2018 Giving ................................................... 21 GIVING USA ESTIMATES 1 Key Findings ......................................................................................... 23 2 The Numbers ........................................................................................ 28 SOURCES OF CONTRIBUTIONS 3 Giving by Individuals ............................................................................. 72 4 Giving by Foundations .......................................................................... 95 5 Giving by Bequest ............................................................................... 119 6 Giving by Corporations ...................................................................... 135 USES OF CONTRIBUTIONS 7 Introduction to the Giving USA Uses of Contributions Chapters & Summary of the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE) ........ 155 8 Giving to Religion ............................................................................... 162 9 Giving to Education ............................................................................ 185 10 Giving to Human Services ................................................................... 207 11 Giving to Foundations ........................................................................ 223 12 Giving to Health .................................................................................. 234 13 Giving to Public-Society Benefit ........................................................... 257 14 Giving to Arts, Culture, and Humanities .............................................. 277 15 Giving to International Affairs ............................................................. 303 16 Giving to Environment/Animals .......................................................... 321 GIVING DATA 17 Data Tables for Charts in The Numbers ............................................... 341 METHODOLOGY 18 Brief Summary of Methods Used ........................................................ 351 19 Glossary .............................................................................................. 367 20 Sources of Philanthropic Information ................................................... 371 The Giving Institute and Giving USA Foundation ....................................... 376 Committees, Advisory Council, and Staff .................................................. 377 Professional Code of Ethics ....................................................................... 385 Standards of Practice ............................................................................... 386 8 | Giving USA FoundationTM | Giving USA 2019 Giving USA Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Each year, the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy (“the school”), the Giving USA Foundation, The Giving Institute, staff at the Sentergroup, and many others work together to produce Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy, the most comprehensive and accurate benchmark for charitable giving in the U.S. This year’s report, describing a particularly complex year of philanthropy, required exceptional effort and coordination from the entire team behind Giving USA. I am grateful for the work of all of these individuals, and for our shared commitment to moving the field of philanthropy forward. I sincerely thank Giving USA Foundation chair, Rick Dunham, and The Giving Institute chair, Rachel Hutchisson, for their leadership and unwavering belief in the importance of the report. I am also grateful to our leaders at the school: Eugene R. Tempel Dean Amir Pasic, Executive Associate Dean for Academic Programs Patrick Rooney, and Associate Dean for Research and International Programs Una Osili are all dedicated to assuring that the school offers the most timely, rigorous, and important research in the field of philanthropy, including the Giving USA report. I thank Josh Birkholz, Giving USA Foundation Chair Giving USA FoundationTM | Giving USA 2019 | 9 Giving USA Acknowledgements of the Advisory Council on Methodology, who has worked closely with the team here at the school to ensure the strength of the estimates this year. Additional thanks goes to Josh for helming a new methodology subcommittee, which will undoubtedly help strengthen the report’s methodology in years to come. In addition, I thank all of the scholars, researchers, and leaders who give their time and expertise in their role as members of the Advisory Council on Methodology. I am grateful to Jon Bergdoll, the school’s statistician, for his careful consideration of all data and methodologies associated with the project and his patience in answering questions, running additional checks, and explaining complicated ideas clearly to our readership. I also thank Jon Durnford at DataLake, LLC who works with our team to produce the estimates for the subsectors of giving. I thank Laura MacDonald and Wendy McGrady, Giving USA Foundation Co-Chairs of the Editorial Review Board (ERB). The partnership between the ERB and the school has grown thanks to their leadership. Thanks are also due to the members of the ERB that served as lead reviewers and chapter reviewers. These reviewers adapted to another new process this year and gave thorough, thoughtful feedback on the Giving USA chapters that invigorated this year’s chapters and will provide a basis for next year’s research as well. In recent years, Giving USA has partnered with current students and alumni of the school to author the chapters analyzing trends for the sources and uses subsectors. This year, I would like to thank both new and returning authors, including: Tessa Skidmore, Josh Moore, Ruth Hansen, Marshawn Wolley, Andy Williams, Rafia Khader, Bryan Fegley, Maarten Bout, Kinga Horvath, and Rebecca TeKolste. I thank Elizabeth Giardina, who provided editorial support, and Amy Thayer, who provided a careful review of the information 10 | Giving USA FoundationTM | Giving USA 2019 Giving USA Acknowledgements in each chapter. Finally, my sincere gratitude goes to Karly Murat-Prater and Edward Vaughan, who worked tirelessly to assure the
Recommended publications
  • Crowdfunding in Asia

    Crowdfunding in Asia

    Crowdfunding in Asia May 2018 Introducing the first free directory of crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The data is based on the AlliedCrowds Capital Finder, a database of over 7,000 alternative finance capital providers across emerging markets. Our data has been used by organizations like FSD Asia, UNDP, World Green Economy Organization, GIZ, World Bank, and others in order to provide unique, actionable insights into the world of emerging market alternative finance. This is the latest of our regular reports on alternative finance in emerging markets; you can find all previous reports here. Crowdfunding rose in prominence in the post-financial crisis years (starting in 2012), and for good reason: a global credit crunch limited the amount of funding available to entrepreneurs and small businesses. Since then, crowdfunding has grown rapidly around the world. Crowdfunding is especially consequential in countries where SMEs find it difficult to raise capital to start or grow their businesses. This is the case in many Asian countries; according to the SME Finance Forum, there is a $2.3 trillion MSME credit gap in East Asia and the Pacific. Crowdfunding can help to fill this gap by offering individuals and small businesses an alternative source of capital. This can come in the form of donation-based as well as lending-based (peer-to-peer or peer-to-business) crowdfunding. In order to help entrepreneurs and small business owners to find the crowdfunding platform that’s right for them, we are releasing the first publicly available list of all crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The report is split into two key sections: the first one is an overview of crowdfunding platforms, and how active they are across the largest markets on the continent.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5011

    Congressional Record—Senate S5011

    July 12, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S5011 The clerk will report the bill by title. COMMENDING THE TENNESSEE experienced its warmest June on record The senior assistant legislative clerk VALLEY AUTHORITY ON THE ever. Already this year there have been read as follows: 80TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNI- eight weather-related and climate-re- A bill (S. 2650) to amend the Internal Rev- FIED DEVELOPMENT OF THE lated disasters that each caused at enue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross in- TENNESSEE RIVER SYSTEM least $1 billion in damage. Globally, it come any prizes or awards won in competi- Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I ask was found that 2015 was the hottest tion in the Olympic Games or the year on record, and so far this year is Paralympic Games. unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. on track to beat last year. We can’t There being no objection, the Senate 528, submitted earlier today. even hold the record for a year—2016 proceeded to consider the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The has been as hot as Pokemon GO—and Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I ask clerk will report the resolution by anyone watching the Senate floor to- unanimous consent that the bill be title. night who is younger than 31 has never read a third time and passed, the mo- The senior assistant legislative clerk experienced in their life a month where tion to reconsider be considered made read as follows: the temperature was below the 20th and laid upon the table, and that the century average.
  • Tucker Carlson

    Tucker Carlson

    Connecting You with the World's Greatest Minds Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson is the host of Tucker Carlson Tonight, airing on primetime on FOX, and founder of The Daily Caller, one of the largest and fastest growing news sites in the country. Carlson was previously the co-host of Fox and Friends Weekend. He joined FOX from MSNBC, where he hosted several nightly programs. Previously, he was also the co-host of Crossfire on CNN, as well the host of a weekly public affairs program on PBS. A longtime newspaper and magazine writer, Carlson has reported from around the world, including dispatches from Iraq, Pakistan, Lebanon and Vietnam. He has been a columnist for New York magazine and Reader's Digest. Carlson began his journalism career at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette newspaper in Little Rock. His most recent book is entitled, Politicians, Partisans and Parasites: My Adventures in Cable News. He appeared on the third season of ABC’s Dancing with the Stars. In this penetrating look at today's political climate, Tucker Carlson takes audiences behind closed doors, offering a candid, up-to-the-moment analysis of events as they unfold. From a look at Congress and the agenda ahead for the next Administration, to behind-the-scenes stories from his time following Donald Trump and his campaign during the 2016 race for the White House, you can always count on Tucker for a witty, informative and frank take on the future of the Republican party and all things political..
  • 2019-Annual-Report.Pdf

    2019-Annual-Report.Pdf

    2019 URBAN INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT A Message from the President Dear Friends, Inspired by our 50th anniversary, the Urban Institute kicked off our next 50 years in 2019 with a renewed commitment to advancing upward mobility, equity, and shared prosperity. We also collaborated with changemakers across the country to develop innovative ideas for how Urban could best fulfill our mission in light of trends likely to bring disruptive change in the decades to come. We did not expect such change to arrive in 2020 in the form of a pandemic that has exposed so many fissures in our society, including the disproportionate vulnerability of people of color to health and economic risks. Nor did we anticipate the powerful uprisings that have called needed attention to police brutality, antiblackness, and racism in our country. But as I consider the work Urban is undertaking to inform an inclusive recovery from the coronavirus pandemic and dismantle the systems and structures that drive racism, I am grateful for the many partners who, by engaging with our Next50 initiative in 2019, helped Urban accelerate the development of capacities and initiatives that are having an impact. Among the ways our work made a difference last year: ▪ Influencing efforts to boost Black homeownership. Our groundbreaking work on dramatic declines in Black homeownership helped make the issue an urgent concern in advocacy and policy circles. Urban delivered powerful new findings showing how a set of housing finance innovations can build wealth in communities of color. We also helped launch a collaborative effort with real estate professionals, lenders, and nonprofit leaders to amplify and solidify a framework for reducing the racial homeownership gap.
  • Expanding Insurance Coverage for Children

    Expanding Insurance Coverage for Children

    XPANDING E INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CHILDREN John Holahan XPANDING EINSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CHILDREN John Holahan Copyright © 1997. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photo- copying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, with- out written permission from the Urban Institute. BOARD OF TRUSTEES URBAN INSTITUTE is a non- Richard B. Fisher profit policy research and educa- Chairman tional organization established in Joel L. Fleishman Vice Chairman Washington, D.C., in 1968. Its staff Katharine Graham investigates the social and economic Vice Chairman William Gorham problems confronting the nation and President public and private means to alleviate Jeffrey S. Berg Joan Toland Bok them. The Institute disseminates sig- Marcia L. Carsey nificant findings of its research Carol Thompson Cole Richard C. Green, Jr. through the publications program of Jack Kemp its Press. The goals of the Institute are Robert S. McNamara to sharpen thinking about societal Charles L. Mee, Jr. Robert C. Miller problems and efforts to solve them, Lucio Noto improve government decisions and Hugh B. Price Sol Price performance, and increase citizen Robert M. Solow awareness of important policy choices. Dick Thornburgh Judy Woodruff Through work that ranges from LIFE TRUSTEES broad conceptual studies to adminis- trative and technical assistance, Warren E. Buffett James E. Burke Institute researchers contribute to the Joseph A. Califano, Jr. stock of knowledge available to guide William T. Coleman, Jr. John M. Deutch decision making in the public interest.
  • Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros

    Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros

    Checks and Balances Project Documents: Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros. $192 Million to 72 Groups Associated with Opposition to Clean Energy Solutions and Climate Change Denial from 1997-2013 $108 Million to At Least 19 Groups to Fight State Renewable Energy Policies 2011-2013 (Over 18 months, Checks and Balances Project conducted the first in-depth investigation into Koch Industries, Inc. AND what we call the Koch Advocacy Network. Over 350 low-profile regulatory disclosures and more than 8,000 legal disclosure forms drawn from over 60 public agencies, databases and courts were examined. Research was completed prior to the 2016 election.) In August 2015 President Obama singled out the “massive lobbying efforts backed by fossil fuel interests, or conservative think tanks, or the Koch brothers pushing for new laws to roll back renewable energy standards or prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding.” The President described these anti-clean energy efforts as “rent seeking and trying to protect old ways of doing business and standing in the way of the future.”1 Charles Koch responded that, “We are not trying to prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding” and warned against “subsidizing uneconomical forms of energy — whether you call them ‘green,’ ‘renewable’ or whatever.” He continued, “And there is a big debate on whether you have a real disease or something that’s not that serious. I recognize there is a big debate about that. But whatever it is, the cure is to do things in the marketplace, and to let individuals and companies innovate, to come up with alternatives that will deal with whatever the problem may be in an economical way so we don’t squander resources on uneconomic approaches.” 2 The defense outlined by Charles mirrors the strategy of the network he oversees.
  • Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why?

    Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why?

    APRIL 2021 Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why? RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY — Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy is dedicated to improving philanthropy to improve the world by training and empowering students and professionals to be innovators and leaders who create positive and lasting change. The school offers a comprehensive approach to philanthropy through its academic, research and international programs, and through The Fund Raising School, Lake Institute on Faith & Giving, Mays Family Institute on Diverse Philanthropy, and Women’s Philanthropy Institute. Learn more at www.philanthropy.iupui.edu INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY PROJECT TEAM — Una O. Osili, PhD Associate Dean for Research and International Programs Jonathan Bergdoll, MA Applied Statistician Andrea Pactor, MA Project Consultant Jacqueline Ackerman, MPA Associate Director of Research, Women’s Philanthropy Institute Peter Houston, MBA Visiting Research Associate With special thanks to Dr. Wendy Chen, Dr. Debra Mesch, and Dr. Pamala Wiepking for reviewing the survey questionnaire. The survey was fielded by AmeriSpeak at NORC. The report was designed by Luke Galambos at Galambos + Associates. This research was completed with funding from Facebook. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions or policies of Facebook. INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY — 301 University Boulevard, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202 317.278.8902 / [email protected] / @IUPhilanthropy / www.philanthropy.iupui.edu Contents Introduction ................................................... 02 Key Findings ................................................. 02 Background ................................................... 05 What is Crowdfunding? ......................................
  • Koch Millions Spread Influence Through Nonprofits, Colleges

    Koch Millions Spread Influence Through Nonprofits, Colleges

    HOME ABOUT STAFF INVESTIGATIONS ILAB BLOGS WORKSHOP NEWS Koch millions spread influence through nonprofits, colleges B Y C H A R L E S L E W I S , E R I C H O L M B E R G , A L E X I A F E R N A N D E Z C A M P B E L L , LY D I A B E Y O U D Monday, July 1st, 2013 ShareThis Koch Industries, one of the largest privately held corporations in the world and principally owned by billionaires Charles and David Koch, has developed what may be the best funded, multifaceted, public policy, political and educational presence in the nation today. From direct political influence and robust lobbying to nonprofit policy research and advocacy, and even increasingly in academia and the broader public “marketplace of ideas,” this extensive, cross-sector Koch club or network appears to be unprecedented in size, scope and funding. And the relationship between these for-profit and nonprofit entities is often mutually reinforcing to the direct financial and political interests of the behemoth corporation — broadly characterized as deregulation, limited government and free markets. The cumulative cost to Koch Industries and Charles and David Koch for this extraordinary alchemy of political and lobbying influence, nonprofit public policy underwriting and educational institutional support was $134 million over a recent five- year period. The global conglomerate has 60,000 employees and annual revenue of $115 billion and estimated pretax profit margins of 10 percent, according to Forbes. An analysis by the Investigative Reporting Workshop found that from 2007 through 2011, Koch private foundations gave $41.2 million to 89 nonprofit organizations and an annual libertarian conference.
  • Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014

    Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014

    EVALUATION OFFICE EVALUATION THE Rockefeller Foundation Rockefeller Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014 Financial support provided by About the Urban Institute Founded in 1968 to understand the problems facing America’s cities and assess the programs of the War on Poverty, the Urban Institute brings decades of objective analysis and expertise to policy debates – in city halls and state houses, Congress and the White House, and emerging democracies around the world. Today, our research portfolio ranges from the social safety net to health and tax policies; the well-being of families and neigh- borhoods; and trends in work, earnings, and wealth building. Our scholars have a distin- guished track record of turning evidence into solutions. About the Rockefeller Foundation Evaluation Office For more than 100 years, the Rockefeller Foundation’s mission has been to promote the well-being of humanity throughout the world. Today, the Rockefeller Foundation pursues this mission through dual goals: advancing inclusive economies that expand opportunities for more broadly shared prosperity, and building resilience by helping people, communi- ties and institutions prepare for, withstand and emerge stronger from acute shocks and chronic stresses. Committed to supporting learning, accountability and performance im- provements, the Evaluation Office of the Rockefeller Foundation works with staff, grantees and partners to strengthen evaluation practice and to support innovative approaches to monitoring, evaluation and learning. Cover photo: Cameron Blaylock Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014 THE Rockefeller Foundation Rockefeller EVALUATION OFFICE EVALUATION Financial support provided by The contents of this report are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Rockefeller Foundation.
  • DIGITAL ISLAMIC ECONOMY Special Focus Brief on the Digital Islamic Consumer Services

    DIGITAL ISLAMIC ECONOMY Special Focus Brief on the Digital Islamic Consumer Services

    DIGITAL ISLAMIC ECONOMY Special focus brief on the Digital Islamic Consumer Services 2015 Part of the State of the Global Islamic Economy Report 2015 SUPPORTED BY: DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED BY: IN COLLABORATION WITH: 30 / 100 / 100 / 50 0 / 100 / 100 / 0 0 / 80 / 100 / 0 0 / 40 / 90 / 0 Dubai the Capital of Islamic Economy Date: 25th February 2013 Andrew Noddings Office 201, Trident Waterfront Brandmark Contact: Shyrose Osman Dubai Marina Dubai, UAE T: +971 55 8803 921 www.theandongroup.com DIGITAL ISLAMIC ECONOMY TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 | Foreword 6 | Executive Summary 8 | Acknowledgements 12 | Defining Digital Consumer-Facing Islamic Services Consumer-Facing Digital Services — Global Context 12 Defining Digital Islamic Services 13 14 | Current Digital Islamic Services Landscape and Key Players Current landscape 14 Digital Islamic Services business models 15 Key players by platform 15 22 | Global Digital Economy Value Profile for Muslim Consumers Total value of Muslims to the Global Digital Economy 22 Muslim spend on E-commerce 23 Digital Ad spend on Muslims 23 Actual Digital Islamic Economy Market Size 23 24 | Key Developments and Trends DIGITAL ISLAMIC ECONOMY Recent activities and key trends in the Islamic Digital Economy 25 28 | Gaps and Opportunities Major unmet needs across the Digital Islamic services spectrum 29 Broader opportunities 31 32 | Challenges 34 | Interviews and Case Studies INTERVIEW: Shahed Amanullah 34 INTERVIEW: Ali Dabaja 36 CASE STUDY: Dubai Technology Entrepreneurship Centre (DTEC) 38 42 | Market Sizing Methodology In the Name of God, the Most Merciful, the Most Beneficent. FOREWORD by Dr Mohammed Alzarooni Vice Chairman and CEO, DSOA In 2013, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, launched a path-breaking initiative - ‘Dubai: Capital of Islamic Economy’.
  • CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT the FOLLOWING COMPANIES and PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO Raised Money for Trump Presidential Campaign

    CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT the FOLLOWING COMPANIES and PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO Raised Money for Trump Presidential Campaign

    Consum5.doc. 11-20. NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM WORKSHEET: PART 2: CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES AND PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO raised money for Trump presidential campaign. Ace Hardware: supports conservative causes. Reversed its decision to withdraw ads from the Laura Ingraham TV Show. ADT: advertises on Sean Hannity Show, subject to liberal boycott. Advance Auto Parts: supports conservative causes. Alaska Airlines: supports conservative religious causes. Amazon Fashion: boycotted by liberals. American Greetings Corporation: supports conservative causes. Amway: 100% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Leftists boycott this company. Amy Grant: conservative celebrity. Angel Soft: contributes to NRA and pro-life groups. Applebees: opposes Obama Care mandates. Axon: the technology company that supplies police with nonlethal weapons, such as tasers, defends its continued production of weapons. B.F. Goodrich (tires): 97% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Badger Sportswear: cut ties in Red China after discovering that a company with which it was affiliated there uses workers from a concentration camp for targeted members of ethnic minority groups persecuted by the government. Barron's Magazine: conservative. Bass Pro Shop: supports the NRA and 2nd Amendment rights. Bayer Company: supports conservative causes. Billy Ray Cyrus: conservative celebrity. Black Rifle Coffee: conservative company. Blaze TV: conservative media outlet. Bloomingdale's: carries Ivanka Trump clothes, shoes, and accessories. Blue Bell Creameries: conservative company. Bo Derek: conservative celebrity. Bob Evans Farms: conservative company. Bon-ton: boycotted by liberals. Brawny Paper Towels: leftists boycott this company, so buy these towels. Contributes to NRA and pro-life groups. Breitbart News: conservative news outlet.
  • Economic Report of the President.” ______

    Economic Report of the President.” ______

    REFERENCES Chapter 1 American Civil Liberties Union. 2013. “The War on Marijuana in Black and White.” Accessed January 31, 2016. Aizer, Anna, Shari Eli, Joseph P. Ferrie, and Adriana Lleras-Muney. 2014. “The Long Term Impact of Cash Transfers to Poor Families.” NBER Working Paper 20103. Autor, David. 2010. “The Polarization of Job Opportunities in the U.S. Labor Market.” Center for American Progress, the Hamilton Project. Bakija, Jon, Adam Cole and Bradley T. Heim. 2010. “Jobs and Income Growth of Top Earners and the Causes of Changing Income Inequality: Evidence from U.S. Tax Return Data.” Department of Economics Working Paper 2010–24. Williams College. Boskin, Michael J. 1972. “Unions and Relative Real Wages.” The American Economic Review 62(3): 466-472. Bricker, Jesse, Lisa J. Dettling, Alice Henriques, Joanne W. Hsu, Kevin B. Moore, John Sabelhaus, Jeffrey Thompson, and Richard A. Windle. 2014. “Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2010 to 2013: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances.” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Vol. 100, No. 4. Brown, David W., Amanda E. Kowalski, and Ithai Z. Lurie. 2015. “Medicaid as an Investment in Children: What is the Long-term Impact on Tax Receipts?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 20835. Card, David, Thomas Lemieux, and W. Craig Riddell. 2004. “Unions and Wage Inequality.” Journal of Labor Research, 25(4): 519-559. 331 Carson, Ann. 2015. “Prisoners in 2014.” Bureau of Justice Statistics, Depart- ment of Justice. Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, Emmanuel Saez, and Nich- olas Turner. 2014. “Is the United States Still a Land of Opportunity? Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility.” NBER Working Paper 19844.