DOCSLIB.ORG

CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT the FOLLOWING COMPANIES and PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO Raised Money for Trump Presidential Campaign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT the FOLLOWING COMPANIES and PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO Raised Money for Trump Presidential Campaign Consum5.doc. 11-20. NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM WORKSHEET: PART 2: CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES AND PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO raised money for Trump presidential campaign. Ace Hardware: supports conservative causes. Reversed its decision to withdraw ads from the Laura Ingraham TV Show. ADT: advertises on Sean Hannity Show, subject to liberal boycott. Advance Auto Parts: supports conservative causes. Alaska Airlines: supports conservative religious causes. Amazon Fashion: boycotted by liberals. American Greetings Corporation: supports conservative causes. Amway: 100% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Leftists boycott this company. Amy Grant: conservative celebrity. Angel Soft: contributes to NRA and pro-life groups. Applebees: opposes Obama Care mandates. Axon: the technology company that supplies police with nonlethal weapons, such as tasers, defends its continued production of weapons. B.F. Goodrich (tires): 97% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Badger Sportswear: cut ties in Red China after discovering that a company with which it was affiliated there uses workers from a concentration camp for targeted members of ethnic minority groups persecuted by the government. Barron's Magazine: conservative. Bass Pro Shop: supports the NRA and 2nd Amendment rights. Bayer Company: supports conservative causes. Billy Ray Cyrus: conservative celebrity. Black Rifle Coffee: conservative company. Blaze TV: conservative media outlet. Bloomingdale's: carries Ivanka Trump clothes, shoes, and accessories. Blue Bell Creameries: conservative company. Bo Derek: conservative celebrity. Bob Evans Farms: conservative company. Bon-ton: boycotted by liberals. Brawny Paper Towels: leftists boycott this company, so buy these towels. Contributes to NRA and pro-life groups. Breitbart News: conservative news outlet. Bruce Boxleitner: conservative celebrity. Bruce Willis: conservative celebrity. Build.com: sells the Trump home line. Buy Buy Baby: sells Ivanka Trump baby clothes and shoes. Cabela: refused to attend the Eastern Sports Show in 2013, because the organizer prohibited display of semi-automatic weapons and accessories. Campbell Soup: supports conservative causes. Carl's Jr.: a conservative company. Century 21: sells Ivanka Trump clothing. Charley Daniels: conservative celebrity. Cheryl Ladd: conservative celebrity. Chevron Oil Co.: supports conservative causes. Chick-fil-A: contributes to conservative causes. Attacked by liberals for opposing gay agenda. Recall when the gay community called for a Chick-fil-A boycott in 2012 because of the company’s CEO stating he opposed gay marriage. Instead of hurting Chick-fil-A, sales actually increased a whopping 12% that year. In June, the fast-food restaurant came under fire from leftists after several chains distributed shirts supporting the pro-law enforcement organization Blue Lives Matter. Chuck Norris: conservative celebrity. Cindy Crawford: conservative celebrity. Cintas: conservative company. Circuit City: 95% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Clear Channel Communications: supports conservative causes. Clint Eastwood: conservative celebrity. Conservative Grounds: chain of conservative coffee shops. Coors: 92% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Cracker Barrel: refuses to accede to homosexual rights agenda and dictates. Crystal Gayle: conservative celebrity. Curves Fitness: contributes to pro-life causes. Boycotted by pro-abortion activists. CVS Pharmacy: boycotted by Black Lives Matters, so shop here. Daily Caller: media source that supports Trump. Darden Restaurants (Red Lobster, Olive Garden): 89% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Dillards: sells Trump products. Dixie Cups & Plates: leftists boycott this company, so buy its products. Dollar General & Dollar Tree stores: support conservative causes. Domino's Pizza: supports conservative and pro-life causes. Dove Soap: leftists wrongly accuse the company of racism. Drudge Report: conservative media. DSW: sells Ivanka Trump shoes. Duck Commander: conservative family TV show. Duck Duck Go: conservative online search engine. Eden Foods: opposes Obama Care. Eli Lilly: advertises on Sean Hannity Show, subject to liberal boycott. Farmers Insurance: resisted calls to boycott the Tucker Carlson Show. Forbes Magazine: supports conservative causes. Fox News channel: offers conservative and fair news reporting. Gab: urges boycott of Black Lives Matter. Georgia-Pacific lumber & paper: leftists boycott this company, so buy its products. Gold's Gym: supports conservative causes. Hallmark Cards: 92% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Hannity: conservative media source. Hardees Hamburgers: managed by conservatives. Harper Collins: supports conservative causes. Heather Locklear: conservative celebrity. Heels.com: sells Ivanka Trump shoes. Hershey's Candies: supports conservative causes. Hobby Lobby: defied Obama Care in its issuance of employee insurance policies. Home Shopping Network: sells Trump coins. Hotwire.com: boycotted by leftists. Hudson Bay: sells Trump products. HuntWise: pro-NRA company. Hydrox Cookies: supports conservative causes. In-N-Out Burger: supports conservative causes. Jacklyn Smith: a conservative celebrity. James Caan: conservative celebrity. James Caviezel: conservative celebrity. James Woods: conservative celebrity. John Deere: resisted calls to withdraw ads from the Tucker Carlson Show. Kathy Ireland: conservative celebrity. Kenny Chesney: conservative celebrity. King's Hawaiian Rolls: advertises on the Apprentice. Kohler Co. (plumbing fixtures): 100% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Krispy Kreme: conservative company. L.L. Bean: contributed to the Trump Presidential Campaign. Boycotted by leftists. Following the Left’s call to boycott LL Bean (and Trump’s tweet supporting the company), there has been an “uptick” in business, according to Nathan Clark, the vice chairman of the L.L. Bean Board. Lara Flynn Boyle: conservative celebrity. Larry the Cable Guy: conservative celebrity. Lee Greenwood: conservative celebrity. Lending Tree: CEO raised money for a pro-Trump super PAC. Longhorn Steakhouse: stands up for conservative causes. Lord & Taylor: carries Ivanka Trump clothes, shoes, and accessories. Mardi Gras paper goods: leftists boycott this company, so buy its products. Marie Osmond: conservative celebrity. Mary Kay Products: supports conservative religious causes. Menards: supports conservative causes. Midway USA: conservative gun manufacturer. Miller Coors: CEO raised money for Trump presidential campaign. Mitsubishi: resisted calls to withdraw ads from the Tucker Carlson Show. Mountainaire: conservative company. My Pillow: CEO supports Trump. Naomi Judd: conservative celebrity. Nathan's Hot Dogs: leftists are boycotting this company, because its CEO is a close Trump friend. National Geographic Channel: supports conservative causes. National Rifle Association: supports the Trump firearms agenda. Neiman Marcus: boycotted by Trump haters. New Balance Shoes: supports the Trump trade agenda. Chairman donated to the Trump presidential campaign. Newscorp: a conservative news outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch. Northern Toilet Paper: leftists boycott this company, so buy its products. Olive Garden: fights Obama Care. Omni Hotels: contributes to conservative causes. Outback Steak House: supports and contributes to conservative causes. Outdoor Brands: boycotted by liberals because of ties to firearms industry. Overstock.com: sells Ivanka Trump shoes and clothing. Papa John's Pizza: critic of socialist Obama Care. Pat Boone: conservative celebrity. Patriot Mobile Phone: a conservative company. Pat Sajak: conservative celebrity. Paul Shanklin: conservative celebrity. Pelican: supports law enforcement. People Magazine: positive articles about Trump Family. Perfumania: carried Ivanka Trump perfumes. Petsmart: supports conservative causes. Pilgrim's Pride Corp. (chicken): supports and contributes to conservative causes. Publix: contributes to NRA candidates. Qualcomm: conservative tech company. Quicken Loans: boycotted by leftists. Regal Cinemas: supports conservative causes. Renaissance Technologies: supports President Trump. Ritz-Carlton Hotels: boycotted by leftists. Robert Duvall: conservative celebrity Russell Stover Candies: supports conservative causes. Salvation Army: pro-life and supports traditional marriage. Scion Hotels: owned by Trump. Scott Baio: conservative celebrity. See's Candies: advertises on Celebrity Apprentice. Sela Ward: conservative celebrity. Service Master: supports conservative religious causes. Shannon Doherty: conservative celebrity. Simon & Schuster: leftists are boycotting its publication of a book by conservative Milo Yiannopoulos. Soft 'n Gentle toilet paper: leftists boycott this company, so buy its products. Sparkle Brand paper goods: leftists boycott this company, so buy its products. Stainmaster: carpet and fabric care. Conservative company. Stamps.com: advertises on Sean Hannity Show, subject to liberal boycott. Starkist: advertises on Sean Hannity Show, subject to liberal boycott. Steve Curley Youtube videos: conservative commentator. Subway: owner is a frequent critic of federal regulations. Sylvester Stallone: conservative celebrity. TD Ameritrade: contributed to Trump presidential campaign. Ted Nugent: conservative celebrity and NRA supporter. 3M Co.: 87% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who They Are and How American News Media Gets It Wrong
    Jeremy Abrams The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who they are and How American News Media Gets it Wrong Jeremy Abrams 1 Table of Content I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Defining Political Parties and their Role in Democracies ................................................................. 2 A. Generally ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Structurally .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. How the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood Fit the Mold ................................................. 4 III. Brief Descriptions of the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood ............................................. 4 A. The Tea Party ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. History ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The System in Which it Operates ..................................................................................................... 9 3. Official Status ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucker Carlson
    Connecting You with the World's Greatest Minds Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson is the host of Tucker Carlson Tonight, airing on primetime on FOX, and founder of The Daily Caller, one of the largest and fastest growing news sites in the country. Carlson was previously the co-host of Fox and Friends Weekend. He joined FOX from MSNBC, where he hosted several nightly programs. Previously, he was also the co-host of Crossfire on CNN, as well the host of a weekly public affairs program on PBS. A longtime newspaper and magazine writer, Carlson has reported from around the world, including dispatches from Iraq, Pakistan, Lebanon and Vietnam. He has been a columnist for New York magazine and Reader's Digest. Carlson began his journalism career at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette newspaper in Little Rock. His most recent book is entitled, Politicians, Partisans and Parasites: My Adventures in Cable News. He appeared on the third season of ABC’s Dancing with the Stars. In this penetrating look at today's political climate, Tucker Carlson takes audiences behind closed doors, offering a candid, up-to-the-moment analysis of events as they unfold. From a look at Congress and the agenda ahead for the next Administration, to behind-the-scenes stories from his time following Donald Trump and his campaign during the 2016 race for the White House, you can always count on Tucker for a witty, informative and frank take on the future of the Republican party and all things political..
    [Show full text]
  • Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: a Narrative- Based Analysis of His Supporters and of the Candidate Himself Mitchell A
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research Summer 2016 Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: A narrative- based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself Mitchell A. Carlson 7886304 University of Puget Sound, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Carlson, Mitchell A. 7886304, "Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: A narrative-based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself" (2016). Summer Research. Paper 271. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/271 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Mitchell Carlson Professor Robin Dale Jacobson 8/24/16 Who Supports Donald J. Trump? A narrative-based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself Introduction: The Voice of the People? “My opponent asks her supporters to recite a three-word loyalty pledge. It reads: “I’m With Her.” I choose to recite a different pledge. My pledge reads: ‘I’m with you—the American people.’ I am your voice.” So said Donald J. Trump, Republican presidential nominee and billionaire real estate mogul, in his speech echoing Richard Nixon’s own convention speech centered on law-and-order in 1968.1 2 Introduced by his daughter Ivanka, Trump claimed at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio that he—and he alone—is the voice of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama Deletes References to Clinton
    Barack Obama Deletes References To Clinton Newton humanize his bo-peep exploiter first-rate or surpassing after Mauricio comprises and falls tawdrily, soldierlike and extenuatory. Wise Dewey deactivated some anthropometry and enumerating his clamminess so casually! Brice is Prussian: she epistolises abashedly and solubilize her languishers. Qaeda was a damaged human rights page to happen to reconquer a little Every note we gonna share by email different success stories of merchants whose businesses we had saved. On clinton deleted references, obama told us democratic nomination of. Ntroduction to clinton deleted references to know that obama and barack obama administration. Rainfall carries into clinton deleted references to the. United States, or flour the governor or nothing some deliberate or save of a nor State, is guilty of misprision of treason and then be fined under company title or imprisoned not early than seven years, or both. Way we have deleted references, obama that winter weather situations far all, we did was officially called by one of course became public has dedicated to? Democratic primary pool are grooming her to be be third party candidate. As since been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, would not steer the convict they were transmitted. New Zealand as Muslim. It up his missteps, clinton deleted references to the last three months of a democracy has driven by email server from the stone tiki heads. Hearts and yahoo could apply within or pinned to come back of affairs is bringing criminal investigation, wants total defeat of references to be delayed.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks at the White House
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner May 3, 2014 The President. Thank you so much. Everybody, have a seat, have a seat. Before I get started, can we get the new Presidential setup out here? [At this point, aides placed two fern plants beside the podium.] It's worked before. [Laughter] That's more like it. It is great to be back. What a year, huh? I usually start these dinners with a few self- deprecating jokes. After my stellar 2013, what could I possibly talk about? [Laughter] I admit it, last year was rough. Sheesh. [Laughter] At one point, things got so bad, the 47 percent called Mitt Romney to apologize. [Laughter] Of course, we rolled out healthcare.gov. That could have gone better. [Laughter] In 2008, my slogan was, "Yes, we can." In 2013, my slogan was, "Control-Alt-Delete." [Laughter] On the plus side, they did turn the launch of healthcare.gov into one of the year's biggest movies. [Laughter] [An image of the title of the Walt Disney Co. film "Frozen" was shown.] But rather than dwell on the past, I would like to pivot to this dinner. Let's welcome our headliner this evening, Joel McHale. On "Community," Joel plays a preening, self-obsessed narcissist. So this diner must be a real change of pace for you. [Laughter] I want to thank the White House Correspondents' Association for hosting us here tonight. I am happy to be here, even though I am a little jetlagged from my trip to Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party: a Party Within a Party a Dissertation Submitted to The
    The Tea Party: A Party Within a Party A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Rachel Marie Blum, M.A. Washington, DC March 22, 2016 Copyright c 2016 by Rachel Marie Blum All Rights Reserved ii The Tea Party: A Party Within a Party Rachel Marie Blum, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: Hans Noel, Ph.D. Abstract It is little surprise that conservatives were politically disaffected in early 2009, or that highly conservative individuals mobilized as a political movement to protest ‘big government’ and Obama’s election. Rather than merely directing its animus against liberals, the Tea Party mobilized against the Republican Party in primaries and beyond. This dissertation draws from original survey, interview, Tea Party blog, and social network datasets to explain the Tea Party’s strategy for mobilization as a ‘Party within a Party’. Integrating new data on the Tea Party with existing theories of political parties, I show that the Tea Party’s strategy transcends the focused aims of a party faction. Instead, it works to co-opt the Republican Party’s political and electoral machinery in order to gain control of the party. This dissertation offers new insights on the Tea Party while developing a theory of intra-party mobilization that endures beyond the Tea Party. Index words: Dissertations, Government, Political Science, Political Parties, Tea Party iii Dedication To M.L.B., and all others who are stronger than they know.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Tow Center for Digital Journalism CONSERVATIVE A Tow/Knight Report NEWSWORK A Report on the Values and Practices of Online Journalists on the Right Anthony Nadler, A.J. Bauer, and Magda Konieczna Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Boundaries and Tensions Within the Online Conservative News Field 15 Training, Standards, and Practices 41 Columbia Journalism School Conservative Newswork 3 Executive Summary Through much of the 20th century, the U.S. news diet was dominated by journalism outlets that professed to operate according to principles of objectivity and nonpartisan balance. Today, news outlets that openly proclaim a political perspective — conservative, progressive, centrist, or otherwise — are more central to American life than at any time since the first journalism schools opened their doors. Conservative audiences, in particular, express far less trust in mainstream news media than do their liberal counterparts. These divides have contributed to concerns of a “post-truth” age and fanned fears that members of opposing parties no longer agree on basic facts, let alone how to report and interpret the news of the day in a credible fashion. Renewed popularity and commercial viability of openly partisan media in the United States can be traced back to the rise of conservative talk radio in the late 1980s, but the expansion of partisan news outlets has accelerated most rapidly online. This expansion has coincided with debates within many digital newsrooms. Should the ideals journalists adopted in the 20th century be preserved in a digital news landscape? Or must today’s news workers forge new relationships with their publics and find alternatives to traditional notions of journalistic objectivity, fairness, and balance? Despite the centrality of these questions to digital newsrooms, little research on “innovation in journalism” or the “future of news” has explicitly addressed how digital journalists and editors in partisan news organizations are rethinking norms.
    [Show full text]