NEWSLETTER a February 1995
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
cB) 2 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOAT OWNERS NEWSLETTER a February 1995 [Editor's comment | Newsletter... 1 : Editor's comment.............. 4 It is good to know that we can . : provide a channel of comm- Chairman's comment ....... 2 unication between members - N@WS ees 2-13 whether it be in solving a prablem Council meeting.............. 3 (see letters) or in collecting oo statistics (see good idea on page Navigation Forum............. 3 14). The next idea is to publish BW Users meeting ........... 6 members' small ads - an easy BW BIL... 8 way to sell that unwanted gas fire _ perhaps? Details on page 14. BW Managers meeting ...10 In the other direction, we are NABO Business.............. 14-16 again asking for your help. If you Reports... 17-18 have not already done so, it is A BON Tout ..ecccccccsecceces 17 time to pester your MP! The Environment Bill needs amend- OMENS... eee tenets 19 ment and there is just time to.add NABO representatives........... 20 your voice to the mass protest. Published by Whilst every care is taken to ensure that the contents of the Boater are National Association of factually correct, we accept no liability for any direct or consequential joss Boat Owners arising from any action taken by anyone as a result of reading anything contained in this publication. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Association. NEWS |Chairman’s comment 1995 has started with a flurry emerging as an Act on the 16th oft activity. January is the British Waterways BW have held a Managers’ General Powers Bill, now the Conference and a Major Users’ British Waterways Act 1995. Most Conference, at both of which of the implications of this have NABO was in attendance, and we yet to emerge. have had the first National Users What is known is that the only Forum for navigational interests, duty to immediately take effect on jointly arranged by NABO and the the Board is the general IWA. environmentai duty. The other We are also still going through duties and powers are the turmoil of the Environment discretionary and will onty Bill {previously called the commence when BW choose to Environment Agency Bill - don’t eniorce them. ask me why they had to change This means that the the name!). This is going through requirements for 3rd party Parliament at high speed - insurance and boat standards though not as high a speed as | have not yet come into effect. thought it would be. Having - The notice period for the looked at the options, it is clear introduction of standards of 12 that we should support the. months for boats built on or after amendments being sponsored by ist January 1970 (and 24 months the BMIF, RYA and IWA. Their for boats built before) will only access to a Parliamentary Agent commence when BW have gat and other organisational the inspector scheme up and resources, and the non existence running with the inspectors in of a petitioning mechanism, place. It is probable that the means that our cause is best requirement for 3rd Party served by supporting their insurance will come in at the amendments which have the best same time as boat standards. chance of being adopted. We will of course keep you Rather slower than the informed ot developments as they Environment Bill, but finally occur. NEWS \View from the Council meeting held on 14th January, 1995 Moley, having been unable to the House of Lords, Council are mind his own listening equipment on the bail and working with other at the last Council meeting, boating groups to try and put asked me to give it the once over. Navigation on the new Agency’s They seem to be a fairly busy lot. tist of tasks. Gilad I’m not the A Parliamentary Waterway House of Commons postie. Group meeting (which NABO had Dredging also surfaced, with a attended) had been given a BW commitment to dredge to presentation by Audrey Lees of original profiles where the silt IWAAC. It seems likely that there was easy to get rid of, otherwise will be a new IWAAC strategy itll depend on how much they document in the Spring, with the can afford to tip. | thought Muck emphasis on heritage. Us Zimmer and Brass went about together. frame boaters might even get Heard something too about a looked after then! Pity is that Broads rep; nearly volunteered IWAAC no longer sees its role as until | found out they meant a watchdog to bark at those who Norfolk (too near Essex for me). endanger the waterways; never But there must be someone out mind though, NABO is still here! there who could spread our The Environment Bill got message in East Anglia - write to talked about almost as much as Jon Darlington if you could help. mooring charges, but with this Bill There’s a lot of boats on them having passed its 2nd Reading in Broads. - Ratty [National Navigation Forum | On the 2ist January the There was an overwhelming leading national user groups with consensus that such a network of a primary interest in navigation communication would be of great met in Birmingham at the joint benefit to user groups. It was invitation of NABO and the IWA decided that the main purpose of to discuss their mutual interests the forum was as a means of and to see if regular meetings communication between user like this would be useful. groups so that we are all made NEWS |National Navigation Forum (continued) aware of events of mutual horizon is the DoE review of interest that come to the attention navigation which is expected to of any one of the groups. go to the Minister next week It was also decided that the before being printed and group should meet from time to distributed in the next two or time, probably quarterly, with the three weeks. This may effect the provision that additional meetings whole way navigation operates would be arranged if something and who will do the operating. arose which needed a quick Clearly a consensus view about response. the way forward would be better than tragmented views. The The group will not be issuing forming of the National mandates on tis own, and no Navigation Forum will have come chairman wili be permanenily just in time to help make a appointed, so that each member concensus view possible. group can act on its own behalf. Attending organisations: One immediate benefit of the meeting is that the group are Association of Pleasure Craft Operators (APCO) considering the BW Act 1995 and Association of Waterway Cruising the associated legally binding - Clubs (AWCC) undertakings, and statements of | intent. British Marine Industries Federation (BMIF) Another immediate benefit is Canal Boatbuilders Association that the group communication (CBA) network has enabled consensus Commercial Narrowboat on the way forward on the Operators Association (CNOA) Environment Bill. There is historic Narrow Boat Owners’ general support tor the Club (HANBOC) IWA/RYA/BMIF amendments put Inland Waterways Association forward in the House of Lords. (IWA) This consensus of support will NABO hopefully improve the chances of Residential Boat Owners the amendments being passed. Association (RBOA) The next problem on the Royal Yachting Association (RYA) NEWS Background to the Forum Some significant events of the being formed, which resulted in last few years have shown the the meeting on 21st January. For desirability for co-ordination this, thanks go to Michael between ail boating interests on Stimpson who worked hard at the Iniand Waterways. For promoting dialogue between the example, the passage of the two groups, and to David British Waterways Bill, the Stevenson, who as the previous introduction of boat standards, IWA chairman made the meetings and most recently the advent of possible. the Environment Bill. It is perhaps surprising that All these are examples of “the there are so many national user powers that be” wielding their groups, but each one has come power without proper regard for about to fill a particular niche for user interests. They (BW and a particular reason. Each has its Government) are bodies with own agenda, but all have an immense power and resources overriding common interest in which individual user groups are navigation on the’ inland unable to match. What has added waterways. to their power is the fact that Navigation is under threat there are so many bodies from various angles. For speaking for different example, we have seen BW navigational interests on the shifting away from navigation intand waterways. The different towards developing other messages sent cut by users activities on their waterways. The gives Government and removal of a significant number Navigation Authorities the idea of “boaters” from IWAAC appears that users don’t really know what to be evidence of this change. they want, and the excuse to There are even more sérious impose their own solutions on threats to navigation by so called them. environmentatists, and the It was with this in mind that Environment Bill will leave the IWA and NABO met together navigation totally unprotected on and explored the possibility of a the waterways currently operated Forum of national user groups by the NRA. NEWS Background to the Forum (continued) With the future of navigation unication. Specific instances being the subject of a were discovered where NABO consuitation document soon to be and the IWA had apparently been released from the DoE, we are told very different things by BW potentially facing one of the most on the same subjects. Because important changes to inland there was previousiy no navigation since the passing of mechanism for communication the Transport Act in 1968.